DOCSLIB.ORG

Elites and the Modern State in Papua New Guinea And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Elites and the Modern State in Papua New Guinea And ELITES AND THE MODERN STATE IN PAPUA NEW GUINEA AND SOLOMON ISLANDS A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Political Science by Andrew James Beaufort Department of Political Science, University of Canterbury 2012 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................ 1 List of Abbreviations ......................................................................................................................... 2 Abstract ................................................................................................................................................ 4 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Introducing the Research .................................................................................................. 5 1.2 Defining the Elites ........................................................................................................... 7 1.3 The Role of Elites in PNG and Solomon Islands ............................................................. 9 1.3.1 Political Elites ............................................................................................................ 9 1.3.2 Religious Elites ........................................................................................................ 16 1.4 Research Method ........................................................................................................... 18 1.5 Time Period of Research ................................................................................................ 19 1.6 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 20 2.0 The Modern State ...................................................................................................................... 21 2.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 21 2.2 Defining the Modern State ............................................................................................. 22 2.3 The Development of the Modern State .......................................................................... 25 2.4 A Shift of Focus ............................................................................................................. 29 2.5 Australia‘s Role in PNG and Solomon Islands .............................................................. 31 2.6 Australia‘s Design for the State in PNG ........................................................................ 32 2.7 Australia‘s Design for the State in Solomon Islands ...................................................... 35 2.8 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 37 3.0 The State in PNG and Solomon Islands ............................................................................... 39 3.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 39 3.2 The Presence of the State ............................................................................................... 39 3.3 Pluralistic Societies ........................................................................................................ 41 3.4 Measuring the States Success ......................................................................................... 43 3.5 Security ........................................................................................................................... 44 3.5.1 PNG ......................................................................................................................... 44 3.5.2 Solomon Islands ...................................................................................................... 47 3.6 Economic Performance .................................................................................................. 49 3.6.1 PNG ......................................................................................................................... 49 3.6.2 Solomon Islands ...................................................................................................... 52 i 3.7 Health and Human Development ................................................................................... 55 3.7.1 PNG ......................................................................................................................... 55 3.7.2 Solomon Islands ...................................................................................................... 56 3.8 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 57 4.0 The Religious Elites ................................................................................................................... 59 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 59 4.2 Churches as Providers of State Services ........................................................................ 60 4.3 The State as an Object of Benefit ................................................................................... 62 4.4 The Churches as Opposition to the State ....................................................................... 66 4.5 The Churches as Agents of the State .............................................................................. 67 4.6 Limits to the Churches Influence ................................................................................... 70 4.7 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 74 5.0 The Political Elites ..................................................................................................................... 76 5.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 76 5.2 The State as an Object of Capture .................................................................................. 77 5.3 A Weak State being Beneficial ...................................................................................... 84 5.4 The State as an Object of Betterment ............................................................................. 87 5.5 The Realities ................................................................................................................... 92 5.6 An Underlying Reason? ................................................................................................. 96 5.7 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 98 6.0 Synthesis..................................................................................................................................... 100 6.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 100 6.2 The Accountability of Leaders to the People ............................................................... 101 6.3 Further Limitations ....................................................................................................... 105 6.4 The State as an Item of Capture ................................................................................... 106 6.5 A Problem for the State as an Entity ............................................................................ 110 6.6 Changing the State ....................................................................................................... 115 6.7 Conclusion .................................................................................................................... 118 7.0 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................. 120 Appendix One: Summary of the Political Crisis in PNG ...................................................... 128 Appendix Two: Summary of Political Events in Solomon Islands in 2011 ....................... 130 Bibliography .................................................................................................................................... 132 ii Acknowledgments There are many people that I need and wish to express my gratitude to. First, I wish to thank my supervisor Mark Francis. Without his assistance, guidance and knowledge, this thesis would have never of eventuated as a coherent piece of work. I have to also thank him for the numerous coffees and entertaining conversations. Second, I wish to thank John Henderson in his role as my secondary supervisor. His knowledge and experience in the sphere of Pacific politics has been invaluable and of much interest. Many thanks to the most important person in the Political Science Department: Jill Dolby, for everything she has assisted me with and for all the helpful advice she has offered throughout this process. Similarly I wish to thank my colleagues; Jess Roche, Rachael Hemmingsen and Kurt McLauchlan for all the hilarity of sharing an office with them and for the valuable role that each played in providing advice and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Abuse of Process in Cross-Border Cases: Moti V the Queen
    ABUSE OF PROCESS IN CROSS-BORDER CASES: MOTI V THE QUEEN * DANIELLE IRELAND-PIPER In a majority of six to one, the High Court in Moti v The Queen concluded that the act of state doctrine does not preclude findings as to the legality of the conduct of a foreign government, where such a finding is determinative of an abuse of process. The decision is a welcome addition to existing international jurisprudence on due process rights in prosecutions of extraterritorial conduct. In turn, it is a reminder that operating extraterritorially does not mean operating without accountability. I INTRODUCTION In Moti v The Queen,1 the High Court of Australia considered whether proceedings can be maintained against a person who has not properly been brought within the jurisdiction by regular means, or whether such proceedings are an abuse of process. In so doing, a majority of six to one concluded that the act of state doctrine does not preclude findings as to the legality of the conduct of a foreign government, where those conclusions are a necessary step to determining a question within the competency of the court. This article will conclude the findings of the High Court in Moti v The Queen are a welcome addition to jurisprudence on procedural irregularities in the prosecution of transnational crime. The High Court in XYZ v Commonwealth2 confirmed that the Commonwealth may rely on section 51(xxix) of the Constitution of Australia to assert extraterritorial criminal jurisdiction over Australian citizens. Such assertions are also permitted under international law by virtue of the active nationality principle.3 However, although useful in fighting transnational crime, assertions of extraterritorial criminal jurisdiction are sometimes overly politicised, and vulnerable to abuses of process.4 Therefore, the decision in Moti v The Queen has implications for the prosecution of offences for conduct occurring extraterritorially, and is a timely reminder for state officials and prosecutors that operating extraterritorially does not mean operating without accountability.
    [Show full text]
  • Heads of State Heads of Government Ministers For
    UNITED NATIONS HEADS OF STATE Protocol and Liaison Service HEADS OF GOVERNMENT PUBLIC LIST MINISTERS FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS COUNTRY HEAD OF STATE HEAD OF GOVERNMENT MINISTER FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS AFGHANISTAN His Excellency Same as Head of State His Excellency Mr. Mohammad Ashraf Ghani Mr. Mohammad Haneef Atmar Full Title President of the Islamic Republic of Acting Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Islamic Afghanistan Republic of Afghanistan Date of Appointment 29-Sep-14 04-Apr-20 ALBANIA His Excellency His Excellency same as Prime Minister Mr. Ilir Meta Mr. Edi Rama Full Title President of the Republic of Albania Prime Minister and Minister for Europe and Foreign Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs of the Affairs of the Republic of Albania Republic of Albania Date of Appointment 24-Jul-17 15-Sep-13 21-Jan-19 ALGERIA Son Excellence Son Excellence Son Excellence Monsieur Abdelmadjid Tebboune Monsieur Abdelaziz Djerad Monsieur Sabri Boukadoum Full Title Président de la République algérienne Premier Ministre de la République algérienne Ministre des Affaires étrangères de la République démocratique et populaire démocratique et populaire algérienne démocratique et populaire Date of Appointment 19-Dec-19 05-Jan-20 31-Mar-19 21/08/2020 Page 1 of 66 COUNTRY HEAD OF STATE HEAD OF GOVERNMENT MINISTER FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS ANDORRA Son Excellence Son Excellence Son Excellence Monseigneur Joan Enric Vives Sicília Monsieur Xavier Espot Zamora Madame Maria Ubach Font et Son Excellence Monsieur Emmanuel Macron Full Title Co-Princes de la Principauté d’Andorre Chef du Gouvernement de la Principauté d’Andorre Ministre des Affaires étrangères de la Principauté d’Andorre Date of Appointment 16-May-12 21-May-19 17-Jul-17 ANGOLA His Excellency His Excellency Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Participatory Approaches to Law and Justice Reform in Papua New Guinea
    PACIFIC ISLANDS POLICY 3 Safety, Security, and Accessible Justice Participatory Approaches to Law and Justice Reform in Papua New Guinea ROSITA MACDONALD THE EAST-WEST CENTER is an education and research organization established by the U.S. Congress in 1960 to strengthen relations and understanding among the peoples and nations of Asia, the Pacific, and the United States. The Center contributes to a peaceful, prosperous, and just Asia Pacific community by serving as a vigorous hub for cooperative research, education, and dialogue on critical issues of common concern to the Asia Pacific region and the United States. Funding for the Center comes from the U.S. government, with additional support provided by private agencies, individuals, foundations, corporations, and the governments of the region. THE PACIFIC ISLANDS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (PIDP) was established in 1980 as the research and training arm for the Pacific Islands Conference of Leaders—a forum through which heads of government discuss critical policy issues with a wide range of interested countries, donors, nongovernmental organizations, and private sector representatives. PIDP activities are designed to assist Pacific Island leaders in advancing their collective efforts to achieve and sustain equitable social and economic development. As a regional organization working across the Pacific, the PIDP supports five major activity areas: (1) Secretariat of the Pacific Islands Conference of Leaders, (2) Policy Research, (3) Education and Training, (4) Secretariat of the United States/Pacific Island Nations Joint Commercial Commis- sion, and (5) Pacific Islands Report (pireport.org). In support of the East-West Center’s mission to help build a peaceful and prosperous Asia Pacific community, the PIDP serves as a catalyst for development and a link between the Pacific, the United States, and other countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Pol I T Ical Reviews ‡ Melanesia 491 Papua New Guinea
    pol i t ical reviews melanesia 491 $LUNR3DSXDKWWSZZZSDSXDEDUDWQHZV swaps in ministerial portfolios, the FRP replacement of two deputy prime min- Pembebasan PapuaKWWSSHPEHEDVDQ isters, and a constitutional blunder in SDSXDEORJVSRWFRP the reelection of the governor-general. In spite of the political rollercoaster, 3ROLWLN,QGRQHVLDKWWSZZZ .politikindonesia.com the Somare government successfully thwarted numerous attempts by the Presiden Republik Indonesia. Opposition to remove Sir Michael KWWSZZZSUHVLGHQULJRLG Somare as prime minister, thus making Radio Republik Indonesia. the government more confident than KWWSZZZUULFRLG ever to assert its grip on power until Rakyat Merdeka. Daily. Jakarta. Online at the national elections in 2012. It was KWWSZZZUDN\DWPHUGHNDFRLG also a year of legal battles and protests on controversial constitutional amend- 5HSXEOLNDFRLGKWWSZZZUHSXEOLND FRLG ments and environmental issues. The concerned public, landowner groups, Sekretariat Kabinet Republik Indonesia. and nongovernmental organizations KWWSZZZVHWNDEJRLG have become a fortified mouthpiece of Suara Pembaruan. Daily. Jakarta. Online the people on issues of human rights, DWKWWSZZZVXDUDSHPEDUXDQFRP equality, environment, and the consti- Survival: The Movement for Tribal tutionality of amendments to laws that 3HRSOHVKWWSZZZVXUYLYDOLQWHUQDWLRQDO seem to favor politicians and multina- RUJ tional companies over people’s rights. Tabloid Jubi Online: An Alternative Media Unlike in previous years, these interest LQ7DQDK3DSXDKWWSWDEORLGMXELFRP groups showed the government
    [Show full text]
  • Download a PDF of the Oil Search Presentation
    Sydney Mining Club | 6 June 2019 OIL SEARCH LIMITED | ARBN 055 079 868 | ASX: OSH | POMSoX: OSH | US ADR: OISHY www.oilsearch.com DISCLAIMER While every effort is made to provide accurate aNd complete iNformatioN, Oil Search Limited does Not warraNt that the iNformatioN iN this preseNtatioN is free from errors or omissioNs or is suitable for its inteNded use. Subject to aNy terms implied by law which caNNot be excluded, Oil Search Limited accepts no responsibility for any loss, damage, cost or expense (whether direct or indirect) incurred by you as a result of any error, omission or misrepresentation in information in this presentation. All informatioN in this preseNtatioN is subject to change without notice. This preseNtatioN also coNtaiNs forward-looking statemeNts which are subject to particular risks associated with the oil and gas industry. Oil Search Limited believes there are reasonable grounds for the expectatioNs oN which the statemeNts are based. However actual outcomes could differ materially due to a range of factors including oil and gas prices, demand for oil, currency fluctuations, drilling results, field performaNce, the timiNg of well work-overs and field development, reserves depletion, progress on gas commercialisation and fiscal and other government issues and approvals. Sydney Mining Club – 6 June, 2019 | PAGE 2 TALK OUTLINE OIL SEARCH – A NINETY YEAR JOURNEY IN PAPUA NEW GUINEA OIL SEARCH 90 YEARS ON DRIVERS FOR GROWTH OVER THE LAST 25 YEARS THE PNG OPERATING ENVIRONMENT v Politics v BusiNess aNd social issues THE
    [Show full text]
  • Press Review: Mining in the South Pacific
    Press review: Mining in the South Pacific Vol. 5, No. 5, September – October 2013, 162 pages Compilation: Dr. Roland Seib, Hobrechtstr. 28, 64285 Darmstadt, Germany http://www.roland-seib.de/mining.html Copyright: The material is copyrighted by the media and authors quoted. Abbreviations in common use: BCL: Bougainville Copper Limited LNG: Liquid Natural Gas PIR: Pacific Islands Report PNG: Papua New Guinea Websites: Pacific Islands Report: http://pidp.eastwestcenter.org/pireport/graphics.shtml PNG Post-Courier: http://www.postcourier.com.pg PNG The National. http://www.thenational.com.pg ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ UN expert body urges action to prevent violation of indigenous rights due to business activities PACNEWS, 31/10/2013 States and corporations need to do more to prevent the violation of indigenous peoples’ rights as a result of business-related activities, a United Nations independent expert body has said. “Indigenous peoples are among the groups most severely affected by the extractive, agro-industrial and energy sectors,” said Pavel Sulyandziga, Chair of the UN Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises. “Negative effects range from indigenous peoples’ right to maintain their chosen traditional way of life, with their distinct cultural identity, to discrimination in employment and in accessing goods and services.” Other challenges involved land use and ownership, as well as displacement through forced or economic resettlement Sulyandziga said yesterday in his presentation of the Working Group’s report to the General Assembly’s social, humanitarian and cultural committee (Third Committee) on the adverse effects of business activities on indigenous peoples’ rights. “Such disruption often leads to serious abuses of civil and political rights, with human rights defenders in particular put at risk,” Sulyandziga said.
    [Show full text]
  • BTI 2010 | Papua New Guinea Country Report
    BTI 2010 | Papua New Guinea Country Report Status Index 1-10 5.85 # 58 of 128 Democracy 1-10 6.35 # 50 of 128 Market Economy 1-10 5.36 # 70 of 128 Management Index 1-10 4.99 # 65 of 128 scale: 1 (lowest) to 10 (highest) score rank trend This report is part of the Transformation Index (BTI) 2010. The BTI is a global ranking of transition processes in which the state of democracy and market economic systems as well as the quality of political management in 128 transformation and developing countries are evaluated. The BTI is a joint project of the Bertelsmann Stiftung and the Center for Applied Policy Research (C•A•P) at Munich University. More on the BTI at http://www.bertelsmann-transformation-index.de/ Please cite as follows: Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2010 — Papua New Guinea Country Report. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2009. © 2009 Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh BTI 2010 | Papua New Guinea 2 Key Indicators Population mn. 6.3 HDI 0.54 GDP p.c. $ 2084 Pop. growth % p.a. 2.0 HDI rank of 182 148 Gini Index 50.9 Life expectancy years 57 UN Education Index 0.52 Poverty2 % 57.4 Urban population % 12.6 Gender equality1 - Aid per capita $ 50.2 Sources: UNDP, Human Development Report 2009 | The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2009. Footnotes: (1) Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM). (2) Percentage of population living on less than $2 a day. Executive Summary During the period under review, Papua New Guinea (PNG) made some progress toward providing its citizens greater freedom of choice by improving the state of democracy and its market-based economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Women and Politics in Presence: Case of Papua New Guinea A
    Women and Politics in Presence: Case of Papua New Guinea A thesis presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Mary Fairio August 2014 © 2014 Mary Fairio. All Rights Reserved. 2 This thesis titled Women and Politics in Presence: Case of Papua New Guinea by MARY FAIRIO has been approved for the Department of Political Science and the College of Arts and Sciences by Julie White Associate Professor of Political Science Robert Frank Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 Abstract FAIRIO MARY, M.A., August 2014, Political Science Women and Politics in Presence: Case of Papua New Guinea Director ofThesis: Julie White One area that presents challenge for democracy is women representation, an important dimension for gender equality. However, there are major variations among countries. Papua New Guinea is one of the countries with the lowest number of female representatives in parliament. Two questions are asked in regard to the representation of women. First, why is it difficult for women to be elected in Papua New Guinea? And second, how do we explain where women were able to challenge others to be elected? Formal institution such as the electoral system is just one way to discuss gender equality. There are other areas of gender inequality that interact with the formal system relating to social, cultural, and economic factors. An analysis of these factors shows that even improving formal institutions to increase the number of women in political participation, gender inequality is still a challenge within and outside the legislative office.
    [Show full text]
  • Papua New Guinea
    COUNTRY REPORT Papua New Guinea The full publishing schedule for Country Reports is now available on our website at http://www.eiu.com/schedule. 4th quarter 1999 The Economist Intelligence Unit 15 Regent St, London SW1Y 4LR United Kingdom The Economist Intelligence Unit The Economist Intelligence Unit is a specialist publisher serving companies establishing and managing operations across national borders. For over 50 years it has been a source of information on business developments, economic and political trends, government regulations and corporate practice worldwide. The EIU delivers its information in four ways: through subscription products ranging from newsletters to annual reference works; through specific research reports, whether for general release or for particular clients; through electronic publishing; and by organising conferences and roundtables. The firm is a member of The Economist Group. London New York Hong Kong The Economist Intelligence Unit The Economist Intelligence Unit The Economist Intelligence Unit 15 Regent St The Economist Building 25/F, Dah Sing Financial Centre London 111 West 57th Street 108 Gloucester Road SW1Y 4LR New York Wanchai United Kingdom NY 10019, US Hong Kong Tel: (44.20) 7830 1000 Tel: (1.212) 554 0600 Tel: (852) 2802 7288 Fax: (44.20) 7499 9767 Fax: (1.212) 586 1181/2 Fax: (852) 2802 7638 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.eiu.com Electronic delivery EIU Electronic New York: Lou Celi or Lisa Hennessey Tel: (1.212) 554 0600 Fax: (1.212)
    [Show full text]
  • 24 June 2016 Excellency, I Refer to the Convention on Cluster
    THE SECRETARY-GENERAL 24 June 2016 Excellency, I refer to the Convention on Cluster Munitions (CCM), which entered into force on 1 August 2010. The Convention on Cluster Munitions prohibits the use, development, production, stockpiling, retaining and transfer of cluster munitions, establishes deadlines for the destruction of stockpiled cluster munitions and clearance of unexploded sub-munitions and contains robust provisions on assistance to cluster munition survivors. I welcome the fact that 100 States have become parties to the Convention since its adoption in 2008. I support all efforts aimed at achieving universal adherence to and full implementation of the provisions of the Convention. A widely supported and strictly implemented Convention would benefit the victims of cluster munitions and affected communities, save lives and prevent enormous human suffering. I would therefore like to encourage your country to consider, without delay, becoming a party to the Convention on Cluster Munitions. By joining the Convention, your country would contribute significantly to the strengthening of international humanitarian law in the interests of promoting international security and preserving human life. Please accept, Excellency, the assurances of my highest consideration. BAN Ki-moon His Excellency Mr. José Eduardo dos Santos President of the Republic of Angola President of the Popular Movement for the Liberation of Angola (MPLA) Luanda THE SECRETARY-GENERAL 24 June 2016 Excellency, I refer to the Convention on Cluster Munitions (CCM), which entered into force on 1 August 2010. The Convention on Cluster Munitions prohibits the use, development, production, stockpiling, retaining and transfer of cluster munitions, establishes deadlines for the destruction of stockpiled cluster munitions and clearance of unexploded sub-munitions and contains robust provisions on assistance to cluster munition survivors.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Reviews
    Political Reviews The Region in Review: International Issues and Events, 2017 nic maclellan Melanesia in Review: Issues and Events, 2017 volker boege, mathias chauchat, alumita durutalo, joseph daniel foukona, budi hernawan, michael leach, james stiefvater The Contemporary Pacic, Volume 30, Number 2, 461–547 © 2018 by University of Hawai‘i Press 461 political reviews • melanesia 531 ville. 6 April. https://www.economist.com/ early in the year, revealing that the news/asia/21720327-first-pacific-island country was experiencing cash flow -may-choose-stay-part-france-second problems due to financial mismanage- -could-split-papua [accessed 6 Feb 2018] ment (Aatai 2017a). It was alleged by The National. 2017a. Micah Vows to former Prime Minister Gordon Darcy Cancel apec. 31 May. https://www Lilo that the government’s reserve .thenational.com.pg/micah-vows-cancel had been reduced within two years -apec/ [accessed 6 Feb 2018] from si$1.5 billion to si$150 million ———. 2017b Polye Pledges to Help (si$100 = us$12.63). As a result, the B’ville Gain Independence. 19 May. government had to borrow to pay its https://www.thenational.com.pg/polye bills and settle other financial com- -pledges-help-bville-gain-independence/ mitments (sibc 2017b). Minister of [accessed 6 Feb 2018] Finance Snyder Rini assured the gen- Tlozek, Erik. 2017. Papua New Guinea eral public that government finances Loses UN Vote over Unpaid Annual Con- were stable and under control. This tributions. abc News (Australia), 23 Feb. was contrary to the government’s http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-02-24/ actual financial performance through- papua-new-guinea-loses-un-vote-over out the year because the government -unpaid-contributions/8298486 continued to delay the payment of [accessed 13 Feb 2018] bills and meeting its financial com- Vari, Mathew.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Privilege Exists for the Greater
    “Parliamentary privilege exists for the greater good of the community and protects the public interest, not only through promoting the functions of an effective parliamentary system and a democratic government but also through Members being freely able to bring matters to the attention of the Parliament.” Mr John Evans Former Clerk of NSW Parliament Evidence presented to the Committee 22 August 2008 Committee Members Hon. Patteson Oti, MP Hon. Clement Kengava, MP Chairman Member Hon. Steve Abana, MP Hon. Milner Tozaka, MP Member Member Hon. Rev. Leslie Boseto, MP Hon. Japhet Waipora, MP Member Member Hon. Patrick Vahoe, MP Hon. Bernard Ghiro, MP Member Member 2 Special Select Committee on Privileges, Immunities and Powers of Parliament Committee Secretariat Secretariat Alice Willy (Research) John Taupongi (Legal) Calvin Ziru (Research) Contacts Special Select Committee of Privileges, Immunities and Powers of Parliament National Parliament of Solomon Islands P O Box G19 HONIARA Website: www.parliament.gov.sb Telephone: (677) 23424 Facsimile: (677) 23080 Committee Report – April 2009 3 Table of Content Content Page Committee Members 2 Committee Secretariat 3 Chairs Foreword 6 Terms of Reference 8 Summary of Recommendations 9 Chapter 1 – Introduction Background to Committee Inquiry 12 The role of the Committee 12 The conduct of the Inquiry 12 Chapter 2 - Background to parliamentary privilege Historical background to parliamentary privilege 14 Definition of parliamentary privilege 14 Nature of parliamentary privilege 16 Chapter 3 - Parliamentary
    [Show full text]