Rotterdam Modern Art and Architecture
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
TU1206 COST Sub-Urban WG1 Report I
Sub-Urban COST is supported by the EU Framework Programme Horizon 2020 Rotterdam TU1206-WG1-013 TU1206 COST Sub-Urban WG1 Report I. van Campenhout, K de Vette, J. Schokker & M van der Meulen Sub-Urban COST is supported by the EU Framework Programme Horizon 2020 COST TU1206 Sub-Urban Report TU1206-WG1-013 Published March 2016 Authors: I. van Campenhout, K de Vette, J. Schokker & M van der Meulen Editors: Ola M. Sæther and Achim A. Beylich (NGU) Layout: Guri V. Ganerød (NGU) COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) is a pan-European intergovernmental framework. Its mission is to enable break-through scientific and technological developments leading to new concepts and products and thereby contribute to strengthening Europe’s research and innovation capacities. It allows researchers, engineers and scholars to jointly develop their own ideas and take new initiatives across all fields of science and technology, while promoting multi- and interdisciplinary approaches. COST aims at fostering a better integration of less research intensive countries to the knowledge hubs of the European Research Area. The COST Association, an International not-for-profit Association under Belgian Law, integrates all management, governing and administrative functions necessary for the operation of the framework. The COST Association has currently 36 Member Countries. www.cost.eu www.sub-urban.eu www.cost.eu Rotterdam between Cables and Carboniferous City development and its subsurface 04-07-2016 Contents 1. Introduction ...............................................................................................................................5 -
Culture at a First Glance Is Published by the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science
... Contents Section 1 Introduction 7 Section 2 General Outline 9 2.1 Geography and language 9 2.2 Population and demographics 9 2.3 The role of the city 11 2.4 Organisation of government 13 2.5 Politics and society 14 2.6 Economic and social trends 15 Section 3 Cultural Policy 19 3.1 Historical perspective 19 3.2 Division of roles in tiers of government in funding of culture 20 3.3 Government spending on culture 21 3.3.1 Central government’s culture budget for 2013-2016 21 3.3.2 Municipal spending on culture 22 3.3.3 Impact of cuts on funded institutions 25 3.4 Cultural amenities: spread 26 3.5 Priority areas for the Dutch government 29 3.5.1 Cultural education and participation in cultural life 29 3.5.2 Talent development 30 3.5.3 The creative industries 30 3.5.4 Digitisation 31 3.5.5 Entrepreneurship 31 3.5.6 Internationalisation, regionalisation and urbanisation 32 3.6 Funding system 33 3.7 The national cultural funds 34 3.8 Cultural heritage 35 3.9 Media policy 38 Section 4 Trends in the culture sector 41 4.1 Financial trends 41 4.2 Trends in offering and visits 2009-2014 44 4.2.1 Size of the culture sector 44 4.2.2 Matthew effects? 45 4.3 Cultural reach 45 4.3.1 More frequent visits to popular performances 47 4.3.2 Reach of the visual arts 47 4.3.3 Interest in Dutch arts abroad 51 4.3.4 Cultural tourism 53 4.3.5 Culture via the media and internet 54 4.4 Arts and heritage practice 57 4.5 Cultural education 59 5 1 Introduction Culture at a first Glance is published by the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science. -
Modernist Heritage Conservation: an Evaluation of Theories and Current Practice
Modernist Heritage Conservation: An Evaluation of Theories and Current Practice Gaia Ileana Carla ZAMBURLINI School of the Built Environment College of Science and Technology University of Salford - UK Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, April 2016 Table of contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................................... II LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................. VII ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ........................................................................................................ IX ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................... X ABSTRACT ……………………………………………………………………………………………................XIII PREFACE ....................................................................................................................... XIV RATIONALE .................................................................................................................... XIV METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................................. XVI AIM ............................................................................................................................... XXII OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................................. XXII RESEARCH -
Must-Sees and Icons of the City 2018
Cover: Markthal, Iris van den Broek van Markthal, Iris Cover: Must-sees and icons of the city 2018 Claire Droppert 1 Rotterdam Centraal Rotterdam Central Station (Team CS, 2014) is one of the most iconic architectural sites MUST DO! in Rotterdam. The roof over the tracks is Need time to take covered in solar panels and the striking hall in this architectural roof points towards the city centre. A number masterpiece? Relax of historic elements from the former station with a cup of coffee building (1957) by Sybold van Ravesteyn next door at Engels have been re-used, like the original clock restaurant, or take in the front façade and the letters spelling the lift in the Groot out ‘Centraal Station’. In the main hall you Handelsgebouw to the 7th floor for a can find several shops, information about beautiful view of public transport and the Rotterdam Tourist Rotterdam Central Information. If you’re looking for original Station. souvenirs, don’t miss shopping at ‘Love Rotterdam. Gifts, Food & More.’ 2 Markthal You’ll find an indoor market hall in various world-class cities, but the combination with luxury housing makes Rotterdam’s Market Hall (MVRDV & INBO, 2014) the first of its kind. The apartments are arched over the DID YOU KNOW? food market in a horseshoe configuration. One of the country’s The main hall houses the market itself, as biggest outdoor well as shops, various restaurants and a four- markets is held on storey car park situated below. Look up to the large square enjoy the massive artwork sprawled across (Binnenrotte) in front of the Markthal the ceiling: the ‘Horn of Plenty’. -
Analysis Charlois
Charlois Analysis Spring 2009 Veldacademie AR2U080 Delft University of Technology Municipality of Rotterdam Ir. O. G. C. Trienekens Alencar Saraiva, R. Berkhout, M. J. Cao, F. Chen, M. Y. Duarte, A. B. Gavin, P. Hamoen, J. E. Kasraian Moghaddam, D. Koutsoupakis, C. Perakis, M. Sapoutzi, D. Schravesande, M. C. H. C. Vreugdenhil, B. Wu, P. 1 2 Content 5 Introduction & Themes 6 Timeline 8 Categories 9 Living 69 Work & Income 89 Health Care & Support 105 Education 123 Social Participation 167 Economy 197 Safety 223 General 229 Sources 3 4 Introduction & Themes Introduction Themes This booklet provides an analysis that is the result of the course AR2U080 at the Field Academy in Charlois, Rotterdam, a MOBILITY collaboration between the municipality of Rotterdam and the University of Technol- ogy in Delft. The analysis is derived from hard and soft data, offering detailed insight on Charlois PRIVATE / PUBLIC in both numbers and people, hereby de- veloping a theoretical background on the area for further development. SOCIAL NETWORKS The data was divided in 7 main categories. Subcategories of these were grouped in three scale levels, the city, the district and the neighbourhood. A focus in analysis from themes rather SOCIAL ABILITY than categories made research from mul- tiple angles valid. In the final scheme (as seen on the front- page) the analysis results -cells- are de- IDENTITY fined by the categories -columns- and scales -rows-. The themes were main- tained by icons as seen right, resulting in a final scheme where within connections were made between different elements of analysis that have influence on one an- other. -
Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director-General, World Health Organization
WELCOME ADDRESSES Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director-General, World Health Organization Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus was elected as WHO Director-General for a five-year term by WHO Member States at the Seventieth World Health Assembly in May 2017. He is the first WHO Director-General to have been elected from multiple candidates by the World Health Assembly, and is the first person from the WHO African Region to serve as WHO’s chief technical and administrative officer. Immediately after taking office on 1 July 2017 Dr Tedros outlined five key priorities for the Organization: universal health coverage; health emergencies; women’s, children’s and adolescents’ health; health impacts of climate and environmental change; and a transformed WHO. Prior to his election as WHO Director-General, Dr Tedros served as Ethiopia’s Minister of Foreign Affairs from 2012–2016. In this role he led efforts to negotiate the Addis Ababa Action Agenda, in which 193 countries committed to the financing necessary to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Dr Tedros served as Ethiopia’s Minister of Health from 2005–2012, where he led a comprehensive reform of the country’s health system. All roads lead to universal health coverage for Dr Tedros, and he has demonstrated what it takes to expand access to health care with limited resources. The transformation he led as Ethiopia’s Minister of Health improved access to health care for millions of people. Under his leadership Ethiopia invested in critical health infrastructure, expanded its health workforce, and developed innovative health financing mechanisms. Beyond Ethiopia, Dr Tedros’ global leadership on malaria, HIV/AIDS, and maternal and child health has been immensely impactful. -
Ontwikkelingen
Next Economy Next City GALERIE FASHION STAD IN VERANDERING PARTNERBIJDRAGEN TRENDS EN ONTWIKKELINGEN Winkelgebieden onder druk Rotterdam aantrekkelijke stad Rabobank – P. 18 P. 4 Krachtenbundeling versnelt Economie, arbeidsmarkt onderwijsinnovatie en opleiding Albeda college – P. 28 P. 14 Onderwijs in de next economy Nederland webshopland Hogeschool Rotterdam – P. 30 P. 20 Studeren in de 21e eeuw Duurzame stad Erasmus Universities Rotterdam – P. 32 P. 36 Samenwerking voorkomt Flexibiliteit op de Rotterdamse verspilling menselijk kapitaal arbeidsmarkt Hogeschool Inholland – P. 34 P. 42 Rotterdams ondernemers- Aantal thuiswerkende landschap verandert Rotterdammers stijgt Kamer van Koophandel – P. 46 P. 44 De slimme kaart van Rotterdam CGI – P. 50 Hoe kunnen we het ESSAYS ondernemersklimaat versterken? Rotterdamse Nieuwe – P. 54 Inzetten op verbreding economische structuur Op weg naar een groene en P. 6 slimme haven Havenbedrijf Rotterdam N.V. – P. 60 Next economy, next city? P. 22 Meer aandacht nodig voor Stadsontwikkeling voor de next hoogwaardig werk economy Randstad – P. 68 P. 38 Het is prettig wonen in De hightech sector: een nieuwe Rotterdam groeimotor? Ooms Makerlaars – P. 74 P. 56 Doorgroeiers kiezen voor Noordwest COLUMNS P. 64 Shortcuts naar de next economy Kansen voor de stadsstraat P. 52 P. 70 1 Voorwoord STAD IN VERANDERING De next economy staat voor fundamentele transities Het gaat goed met de Rotterdamse economie. De economische Door flexibele productieve voorzieningen zal het flexwerken een groei van het afgelopen jaar zet dit jaar door, de werkgelegen- steeds andere invulling krijgen en groeit het aantal zzp’ers in in economie en maatschappij. Deze transities worden heid neemt toe en steeds meer toeristen komen naar de stad. -
Modern Architecture and Modern Furniture
Modern Architecture and Modern Furniture 14 docomomo 46 — 2012/1 docomomo46.indd 14 25/07/12 11:13 odern architecture and Modern furniture originated almost during the same period of time. Modern architects needed furniture compatible with their architecture and because Mit was not available on the market, architects had to design it themselves. This does not only apply for the period between 1920 and 1940, as other ambitious architectures had tried be- fore to present their buildings as a unit both on the inside and on the outside. For example one can think of projects by Berlage, Gaudí, Mackintosh or Horta or the architectures of Czech Cubism and the Amsterdam School. This phenomenon originated in the 19th century and the furniture designs were usually developed for the architect’s own building designs and later offered to the broader consumer market, sometimes through specialized companies. This is the reason for which an agree- ment between the architect and the commissioner was needed, something which was not always taken for granted. By Otakar M á c ˆe l he museum of Czech Cubism has its headquarters designed to fit in the interior, but a previous epitome of De in the Villa Bauer in Liboˇrice, a building designed Stijl principles that culminated in the Schröderhuis. Tby the leading Cubist architect Jiˆrí Gocˆár between The chair was there before the architecture, which 1912 and 1914. In this period Gocˆár also designed Cub- was not so surprising because Rietveld was an interior ist furniture. Currently the museum exhibits the furniture designer. The same can be said about the “father” of from this period, which is not actually from the Villa Bauer Modern functional design, Marcel Breuer. -
Exhibitions, Street Art, Galleries and Sculptures
October 2019 – January 2020 exhibitions, street art, galleries and sculptures boijmans.nl/transit 1 Transit Boijmans Van Beuningen Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen’s long- term renovation has started. During this Transit period, institutions and museums across Rotterdam will be holding exhibitions with works of art from the museum collection under the title ‘Boijmans Next Door’. The Above: After seven months of collection will also be travelling to some of relocating the permanent the world’s top museums. In the meantime, collection, Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen is empty. construction of the Depot continues apace photo: Aad Hoogendoorn and this landmark is set to open in 2021. Right: Artist impression of the exterior of the Depot Boijmans Van Beuningen. Design: MVRDV Depot Boijmans Van Beuningen It is the first depot in the world that provides access to a complete collection without the intervention of a curator. The 40-metre high, mirrored building is a design from the Rotterdam architect Winy Maas from MVRDV and offers a beautiful, panoramic view of the city and the port from the freely accessible roof garden with restaurant. kunsthal.nl 2 Kunsthal Rotterdam Museumpark The Kunsthal Rotterdam is housed in Westzeedijk 341 a striking building designed by OMA/ Rem Koolhaas (1992). The Kunsthal presents several exhibitions simultaneously, taking visitors on a journey through various cultures and art movements from modern masters and contemporary art to forgotten cultures, photography, fashion and innovative design. Joana Vasconcelos. ‘I’m Your Mirror’ This impressive retrospective features the work of the famous Portuguese artist Joana Vasconcelos (1971). ‘I’m Your Mirror’ shows sculptures and installations such as ‘Lilicoptère, 2012’, a gold-plated helicopter Above: Lilicoptère, 2012 decorated with Swarovski crystals and pink © Joana Vasconcelos, FMGB Guggenheim Bilbao Museoa. -
Thesis Understandingfootball Hooliganism Amón Spaaij Understanding Football Hooliganism
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Understanding football hooliganism : a comparison of six Western European football clubs Spaaij, R.F.J. Publication date 2007 Document Version Final published version Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Spaaij, R. F. J. (2007). Understanding football hooliganism : a comparison of six Western European football clubs. Vossiuspers. http://nl.aup.nl/books/9789056294458-understanding- football-hooliganism.html General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:01 Oct 2021 AUP/Spaaij 11-10-2006 12:54 Pagina 1 R UvA Thesis amón Spaaij Hooliganism Understanding Football Understanding Football Hooliganism Faculty of A Comparison of Social and Behavioural Sciences Six Western European Football Clubs Ramón Spaaij Ramón Spaaij is Lecturer in Sociology at the University of Amsterdam and a Research Fellow at the Amsterdam School for Social Science Research. -
Patrimoine Mondial 23 COM
Patrimoine Mondial 23 COM Distribution limitée WHC-99/CONF.209/10 Paris, le 5 octobre 1999 Original : anglais / français ORGANISATION DES NATIONS UNIES POUR L'EDUCATION, LA SCIENCE ET LA CULTURE CONVENTION CONCERNANT LA PROTECTION DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL, CULTUREL ET NATUREL COMITE DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL Vingt-troisième session Marrakech, Maroc 29 novembre – 4 décembre 1999 Point 8 de l’ordre du jour provisoire : Informations sur les listes indicatives et examen de propositions d’inscription de biens culturels et naturels sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial en péril et la Liste du patrimoine mondial RESUME 1. A sa dix-septième session à Carthagène, en décembre 1993, le Comité a exprimé sa préoccupation quant au petit nombre de listes indicatives qui répondaient aux exigences stipulées aux paragraphes 7 et 8 des Orientations, et il a confirmé l'importance de ces listes pour la planification, l'analyse comparative des propositions d'inscription et la réalisation des études globales et thématiques. Ces listes constituent en outre un inventaire des biens situés sur le territoire de chaque Etat partie que ce dernier considère comme susceptibles d'être inscrits sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial. Le Comité a également confirmé que les listes indicatives sont obligatoires pour les biens culturels pour lesquels les Etats parties ont l'intention de soumettre des propositions d'inscription sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial dans les cinq à dix prochaines années. 2. En conséquence, le Comité a invité les Etats parties qui ne l'avaient pas encore fait, à soumettre leurs listes indicatives conformément aux Orientations, étant entendu qu’ "une assistance préparatoire sera fournie si nécessaire et à la demande de l'Etat partie concerné". -
Shophouse Transformation in Feijenoord
Housing Transformation in Feijenoord, Rotterdam Student name: Y.K. Poon |4118561 ShopHouse Transformation in Feijenoord Introduction ShopHouse is a vernacular building type. ShopHouses are mostly two to three stories high, each with a shop operated on the ground floor for commercial activity and a dwelling above the shop. They are mixed-use buildings that serve social and economical functions. They could be found not only in Nederland, but are also very common in other countries. Usually, the dwelling part of the building is housing family of the owner of the ground floor shop. The relationship between shop and dwelling is close and direct. However, this building type became displaced in the twentieth century. “Shops” were claimed as sources of nuisance, and excluded from dwelling area. Housing developments, especially those being built after the Second World War (WWII), are always pure dwellings. Example of the displacement of the ShopHouse could be found in Feijenoord of Rotterdam. Feijenoord was developed into a port industrial area in the late nineteenth century, ShopHouse were built for the port workers of ports and their families at that time1. However, these ShopHouse were substantially changed over the past hundred years. Functionally, the relationship between shop and dwelling are disconnected recently. The shop operators may not live in the dwelling units above. Physically, some of ShopHouse were renovated, of which some shops were removed from the building in the Seventies. And last year, rows of ShopHouse in Oranjeboomstraat were demolished and left vacant (see fig. 1). Once being so dominant in urban culture and street fabric, what is the future of this building typology? Is being demolished the only way out for it? In this writing, the fall of ShopHouse is briefly narrated.