DOCSLIB.ORG

Pedestrian Facilities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pedestrian Facilities COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW CHILDREN’S NATIONAL AT WALTER REED Z.C. CASES NO. 19-24 AND 19-24A: TEXT AND MAP AMENDMENT WASHINGTON, DC January 27, 2020 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia CASE NO.19-24A EXHIBIT NO.7A Prepared by: 1140 Connecticut Avenue NW 3914 Centreville Road 15125 Washington Street Suite 600 Suite 330 Suite 212 Washington, DC 20036 Chantilly, VA 20151 Haymarket, VA 20169 Tel: 202.296.8625 Tel: 703.787.9595 Tel: 571.248.0992 Fax: 202.785.1276 Fax: 703.787.9905 Fax: 703.787.9905 www.goroveslade.com This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of services, is intended for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization by Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc., shall be without liability to Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc. Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................................................................... i Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose of Study .................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Summary .................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Contents of Study .................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Study Area Overview ................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Major Transportation Features .............................................................................................................................................................. 5 Future Projects ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Project Design .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 13 Site Access and Circulation .................................................................................................................................................................. 13 Parking ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 13 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities .......................................................................................................................................................... 14 Streetcar Service to Site ....................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Transportation Demand Management (TDM) ..................................................................................................................................... 14 Sustainable Transportation Elements .................................................................................................................................................. 15 Trip Generation ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 19 Traffic Operations .................................................................................................................................................................................... 20 Study Area, Scope, & Methodology ..................................................................................................................................................... 20 Vehicular Analysis Results .................................................................................................................................................................... 25 Mitigation Measures ............................................................................................................................................................................ 26 Transit ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 61 Existing Transit Service ........................................................................................................................................................................ 61 Proposed Transit Service ..................................................................................................................................................................... 61 Site Impacts .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 62 Pedestrian Facilities ................................................................................................................................................................................. 65 Pedestrian Study Area.......................................................................................................................................................................... 65 Pedestrian Infrastructure ..................................................................................................................................................................... 65 Site Impacts .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 65 Bicycle Facilities ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 69 Existing Bicycle Facilities ...................................................................................................................................................................... 69 Proposed Bicycle Facilities ................................................................................................................................................................... 69 Site Impacts .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 70 Safety Analysis ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 72 Summary of Safety Analysis ................................................................................................................................................................. 72 Potential Impacts ................................................................................................................................................................................. 72 Summary and Conclusions ....................................................................................................................................................................... 77 Figures Figure 1: Site Location ................................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Figure 2: Site Aerial .................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Figure 3: Summary of Walkscore and Bikescore ........................................................................................................................................ 7 Figure 4: Major Regional Transportation Facilities .................................................................................................................................. 10 Figure 5: Major Local Transportation Facilities ........................................................................................................................................ 11 Figure 6: Background Developments ....................................................................................................................................................... 12 Figure 7: Site Plan .................................................................................................................................................................................... 16 Figure 8: Site Access and Circulation ....................................................................................................................................................... 17 Figure 9: Truck Routes
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bowie Washington Clinton Oxon Hill Camp Springs
    503 Z7 to/from Laurel to/from Columbia 409 Z2 to/from Olney C8 to/from White Flint to/from Elkridge Z11 to/from Laurel Racetrack Burtonsville Park & Ride Montgomery 295 St 302 Main St Z6 Sandy Spring Rd 89M WESTFARM to/from Burtonsville/ RTA provides local service Castle Blvd Z7 Old Sandy 87 Z2 Z7 to/from throughout Central Maryland, Spring Rd Z8 Z6 Paul S. Sarbanes Transit Center to/from Greencastle/Briggs Chaney (Silver Spring m ) Sweitzer Ln including Laurel. 503 COLUMBIA PIKE 302 Gorman Ave 5th St WHITE OAK 409 K6 Industrial Intercounty Connector Van Dusen Rd 87 Pkwy CALVERTON 141 89 89M 89 Laurel Tech Broadbirch Dr 141 to/from Rd Galway Dr Gaithersburg Park & Ride Calverton Blvd Laurel 301 Washington Blvd Van Dusen Rd Fort Meade Rd B30 Z6 Z7 Regional Z7 302 LAUREL Baltimore-Washingtonto/from Pkwy BWI Airport via Arundel Mills Z7 502 Hospital Ashford 4th St LOCKWOOD DR Blvd 502 to/from Arundel Mills Z11 K9 R2 Beltsville Dr 87 C8 FDA Cherry Ln Z2 C8 Red Clay Rd PATUXENT RIVER Plum Orchard Dr Towne Centre 502 Old Z8 Mulberry St Laurel 87 Annapolis Rd Broadbirch Dr Broadbirch R2 Z6 95 301 White Oak Cherry Hill Rd 89 Cherry Ln Adventist St Cypress 302 502 89M Laurel-Bowie Federal Medical Center 87 Z7 Rd Research South Laurel NEW HAMPSHIRE AVE AmmendaleVirginia Rd B30 Muirkirk Park & Ride Center 86 Manor Ritz Way Baltimore Ave COLUMBIA PIKE Rd Rd Z7 Centerpark Powder Mill Rd Laurel-Bowie Rd89M 87 Office Park Contee Rd 301 89 Z2, Z6, Z7, Z8, Z11 to/from Powder Mill Rd Muirkirk Rd 89M Muirkirk Paul S.
    [Show full text]
  • Purple Line Functional Plan? 6 Table 9 Stewart Avenue to CSX/WMATA Right-Of-Way 23
    Approved and Adopted September 2010 purple line F u n c t i o n a l P l a n Montgomery County Planning Department The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission P u r p l e L i n e F u n c t i o n a l P l a n I A p p r o v e d a n d A d o p t e d 1 p u r p l e l i n e f u n c t i o n a l p l a n Approved and Adopted a b s t r a c t The Commission is charged with preparing, adopting, and amending or extending The General Plan (On Wedges and Corridors) for the Physical This plan for the Purple Line transit facility through Montgomery County Development of the Maryland-Washington Regional District in Montgomery contains route, mode, and station recommendations. It is a comprehensive and Prince George’s Counties. amendment to the approved and adopted 1990 Georgetown Branch Master Plan Amendment. It also amends The General Plan (On Wedges and The Commission operates in each county through Planning Boards Corridors) for the Physical Development of the Maryland-Washington appointed by the county government. The Boards are responsible for all Regional District in Montgomery and Prince George’s Counties, as local plans, zoning amendments, subdivision regulations, and amended, the Master Plan of Highways for Montgomery County, the administration of parks. Countywide Bikeways Functional Master Plan, the Bethesda-Chevy Chase Master Plan, the Bethesda Central Business District Sector Plan, the Silver The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission encourages Spring Central Business District and Vicinity Sector Plan, the North and West the involvement and participation of individuals with disabilities, and its Silver Spring Master Plan, the East Silver Spring Master Plan, and the facilities are accessible.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Metrobus Public Hearing
    Notice of Public Hearing Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Docket B20-01: Proposed FY2021-2026 Capital Improvement Program Docket B20-02: Proposed FY2021 Operating Budget and Related Service and Fare Proposals Purpose Notice is hereby given that public hearings will be held by the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority on the dockets mentioned above as follows: Hearing No. 628 Monday, February 24, 2020 Hilton Arlington 950 N. Stafford Street, Arlington, VA 22203 Open House at 6:00 p.m. – Public Hearing at 6:30 p.m. Hearing No. 629 Tuesday, February 25, 2020 Metro Points Hotel 8500 Annapolis Road New Carrollton, MD 20784 Open House at 6:00 p.m. – Public Hearing at 6:30 p.m. Hearing No. 630 Wednesday, February 26, 2020 Metro Headquarters Building 600 5th Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 Open House at 4:00 p.m. – Public Hearing at 4:30 p.m. Please note that these dates are subject to each facility’s cancellation policy. In the event of a cancellation, Metro will post information about the new hearings on wmata.com Speaker registration at each hearing is on-site only and closes at the close of the hearing or 9 p.m., whichever comes first. Please note that these dates are subject to WMATA’s inclement weather cancellation policy. In the event of a cancellation, WMATA will post information about a new hearing on wmata.com. For more information please visit www.wmata.com/budget. The locations for all Metro public hearings are wheelchair accessible. Any individual who requires special assistance or additional accommodation to participate in public hearings, or requires these materials in an alternate format, should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 962-2511 or: TTY (202) 962-2033 as soon as possible in order for Metro to make necessary arrangements.
    [Show full text]
  • Weighing Maryland's Economic Future
    $ $ $ $ $ $ WEIGHING MARYLAND’s ECONOMIC FUTURE $ $ $ $ $ $ ASSESSING THE BENEFITS FROM THE RED AND PURPLE LINES Primary Author: Sarah Kline, SK Solutions, LLC Editor: David Goldberg, Communications Director, Transportation for America Design and Layout: Stephen Davis, Deputy Communications Director, Transportation for America Transportation for America is an alliance of elected, business and civic leaders from communities across the country, united to ensure that states and the federal government step up to invest in smart, homegrown, locally-driven transportation solutions — because these are the investments that hold the key to our future economic prosperity. Transportation for America is a program of Smart Growth America. t4america.org This report was made possible through the support of the Annie E. Casey Foundation. May 2015 Transportation for America Advisory Board The Hon. John Robert Smith, former Mayor, Meridian MS (Chairman) The Hon. Ben McAdams, Mayor, Salt Lake County (UT) The Hon. Greg Ballard, Mayor, Indianapolis, IN The Hon. William Bell, Mayor, Durham, NC The Hon. Elaine Clegg, Councilmember, Boise, ID The Hon. Chris Koos, Mayor, Normal, IL The Hon. Marc Morial, President & CEO, National Urban League, former Mayor, New Orleans, LA The Hon. Mayor Ken Barr, former Mayor, Fort Worth, TX Councilor Craig Dirksen, Metro District 3, Oregon Metro Maud Daudon, President & CEO, Seattle Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce (WA) Ralph Schulz, President and CEO, Nashville Area Chamber of Commerce (TN) Mary Leslie, President, Los Angeles
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution # 20-46
    Presented and Adopted: December 10, 2020 SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION FOR A COMPACT PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED FISCAL YEAR 2022 CAPITAL BUDGET, OPERATING BUDGET, AND SERVICE REDUCTIONS, AND FOR PUBLIC COMMENT ON PARKING RATE CHANGES 2020-46 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY WHEREAS, Compact Section 62 requires the Board to hold a public hearing for major service reductions; and WHEREAS, The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) requires that all recipients of Urbanized Area Formula Program C'Section 530?1') grant funding annually develop, publish, hold a public hearing on, and submit for approval a Program of Projects that is part of the capital budget; and WHEREAS, Enactment Clause 8 of the 2018 Virginia dedicated funding statute requires WMATA to hold a public hearing on a capital improvement plan (part of the capital budget) within the geographic limits of the Northern Virginia Transportation Commission (NVTC); and WHEREAS, The proposed $2.8 billion capital budget for Fiscal Year (FY) 2022, which constitutes the WMATA Program of Projects (included in Attachment A), funds critical safety investmentsfor customers and employees as well as necessarystate of good repair investments to improve the safe, reliable and effective pelformance of the Metro transit system; and WHEREAS, The proposed FY2022-2027 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) of $12.5 billion (included in Attachment A), includes federal funding from FTA annual formula grant programs, including funding received through Section5307; and WHEREAS, The Board desires to obtain public comment on the proposed $1.39 billion Operating Budget for FY 2022 (Attachment B) that includes proposals for major service reductions to Metrorail and Metrobus operations (Attachment C) and changes to parking rates (Attachment D); NOW, THEREFORE, be it Motioned by Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Noise and Vibration Technical Report
    Noise and Vibration Technical Report September 2008 Table of Contents Page 1. Introduction to Purple Line............................................................................................... 1-1 1.1. Background and Project Location ................................................................................. 1-1 1.1.1. Corridor Setting..................................................................................................... 1-2 1.2. Alternatives Retained for Detailed Study...................................................................... 1-2 1.2.1. Alternative 1: No Build Alternative...................................................................... 1-4 1.2.2. Alternative 2: TSM Alternative ............................................................................ 1-4 1.2.3. Build Alternatives ................................................................................................. 1-4 1.2.4. Design Options.................................................................................................... 1-10 1.2.5. Stations and Station Facilities ............................................................................. 1-11 1.2.6. Maintenance and Storage Facilities .................................................................... 1-13 1.2.7. Traction Power Substations ................................................................................ 1-14 2. Noise and Vibration Analysis ............................................................................................ 2-1 2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Compliance Application of The
    STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE APPLICATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA, REPRESENTED BY THE AUSTRALIAN EMBASSY 1601 Massachusetts Avenue, NW (Square 181, Lot 162) 1. Introduction The Commonwealth of Australia, represented by the Australian Embassy, Washington DC (the “Embassy” or the “Applicant”), proposes to remove the existing Australian chancery building at 1601 Massachusetts Avenue, NW (Square 181, Lot 162) and replace it with a new chancery building.1 The building will contain chancery office space, conference and meeting rooms, consular services, and accessory space. The replacement chancery building’s height, density, and lot occupancy will be generally consistent with that of the existing chancery building. As further detailed below, Foreign Missions Board of Zoning Adjustment (“FMBZA”) review is required for the proposed replacement chancery. The FMBZA has exclusive jurisdiction to review the proposed project pursuant to Section 206 of the Foreign Missions Act (22 USC § 4306) (the “Act”) and Subtitle X, Chapter 2 of the 2016 Zoning Regulations (“DCMR 11”), including public space approval and historic preservation approval pursuant to 11X DCMR §§ 201.8 and 203.7. The Act makes it clear that provisions of law other than the Act "shall apply to chanceries only to the extent that they are consistent with this section." 22 USC § 4306(j). Further, "[N]o act of any Federal agency shall be effective to confer or deny any benefit with respect to any foreign mission contrary to this Chapter." 22 USC § 4307. The final determination made by the FMBZA concerning the location, replacement or expansion of a chancery “shall not be subject to 1 “Chancery” is defined in the Zoning Regulations and in the Foreign Missions Act as “[t]he principal offices of a foreign mission used for diplomatic or related purposes, and annexes to such offices (including ancillary offices and support facilities), including the site and any building on such site that is used for such purposes.” 11B DCMR § 100.2; 22 USC § 4302.
    [Show full text]
  • Effective Sunday, August 23, 2020 a Partir Del Domingo, 23 De Agosto De 2020
    Effective Sunday, August 23, 2020 A partir del domingo, 23 de agosto de 2020 59 For route and schedule information 14th Street Limited Line 59 Call 202-637-7000 14th Street Limited Line www.wmata.com TAKOMA STATION CARROLL ST GEORGIAAVE BUTTERNUT ST ASPEN ST ST 4TH 13TH PL 13TH Legend — Metrorail Station 14TH ST 14TH — Terminal Stands — Serves Only FORT STEVENS DR Selected Stops MISSOURI AVE COLORADO AVE JEFFERSON ST GALLATIN ST IOWA AVE BUCHANAN ST UPSHUR ST 14TH ST 14TH SPRING RD PARK RD MONROE ST IRVING ST COLUMBIA HEIGHTS STATION CHAPIN ST BELMONT ST U ST P ST RHODE ISLAND AVE 14TH ST 14TH McPHERSON K ST SQUARE STATION T I ST S METRO CENTER 13TH STATION F ST FEDERAL ST 12TH TRIANGLE 10TH ST Page 1 of 4 STATION CONSTITUTION AVE WMATA ©2018 For information regarding this map contact <R•A•D•S>. Effective Sunday, August 23, 2020 59 A partir del domingo, 23 de agosto de 2020 14th Street Limited Line Southbound To Federal Triangle Monday thru Friday — De Lunes a viernes (except holidays - excepto los días festivos) 14th 14th 10th St. & & & Irving I Pennsylvania 14th Sts. Sts. Ave. St. 14th NW 14th NW NW 14th & & (Columbia & (McPherson (FEDERAL & Colorado Buchanan U Takoma Heights) Square) TRIANGLE) Route Aspen Sts. Ave. Sts. Sts. Number NW NW NW NW AM Service — Servicio matutino 59 6:21 6:27 6:34 6:37 6:45 6:50 6:57 7:03 59 6:36 6:42 6:49 6:52 7:00 7:05 7:12 7:18 59 6:51 6:57 7:04 7:07 7:15 7:20 7:27 7:33 59 7:06 7:12 7:19 7:22 7:30 7:35 7:42 7:48 59 7:11 7:18 7:26 7:31 7:45 7:51 8:01 8:07 59 7:26 7:33 7:41 7:46 8:00 8:06 8:16 8:22 59 7:37
    [Show full text]
  • Bicycle Facilities
    COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW SHEPHERD PARK PUD WASHINGTON, DC March 11, 2016 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 15-29 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia CASE NO.15-29 DeletedEXHIBIT NO.22B Prepared by: 1140 Connecticut Avenue NW 3914 Centreville Road 15125 Washington Street Suite 600 Suite 330 Suite 136 Washington, DC 20036 Chantilly, VA 20151 Haymarket, VA 20169 Tel: 202.296.8625 Tel: 703.787.9595 Tel: 703.787.9595 Fax: 202.785.1276 Fax: 703.787.9905 Fax: 703.787.9905 www.goroveslade.com This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of services, is intended for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization by Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc., shall be without liability to Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc. Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Contents of Study .................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Study Area Overview ................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Metrobus Route Sheets
    Appendix B: Metrobus Recommendation Route Sheets Report Prepared by: Contents Route 1A ......................................................................................................................B-2 Route 1B ......................................................................................................................B-4 Route 1E ......................................................................................................................B-6 Route 1Z ......................................................................................................................B-8 Route 1Y .................................................................................................................... B-10 Route 2A .................................................................................................................... B-12 Route 3A .................................................................................................................... B-14 Route 3Y .................................................................................................................... B-16 Route 4A .................................................................................................................... B-18 Route 4B .................................................................................................................... B-20 Route 5A .................................................................................................................... B-22 Route 7A ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Docket/Notice of Public Hearing
    Notice of Public Hearing Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Docket B17-01: Proposed FY2018 Operating Budget and Docket B17-02: Proposed FY2018 Capital Improvement Program and Federal FY2017 Grant Applications Purpose Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority on the two dockets noted above as follows: Hearing No. 613 Monday, January 30, 2017 Metro Headquarters Building 600 Fifth Street NW Washington, DC 20001 Open House 4:30 – 6:30 p.m. Public Hearing at 5 p.m. Speaker registration is on-site only and closes at 9 p.m. Please note that this date is subject to Metro’s inclement weather cancellation policy. In the event of a cancellation, Metro will post information about a new hearing on wmata.com. The public hearing location is wheelchair accessible. Any individual who requires special assistance such as a sign language interpreter or additional accommodation to participate in the public hearing, or who requires these materials in an alternate format, should contact Danise Peña at 202-962-2511 or TTY: 202-962-2033 as soon as possible in order for Metro to make necessary arrangements. For language assistance, such as an interpreter or information in another language, please call 202-962-2582 at least 48 hours prior to the public hearing date. For more information please visit www.wmata.com/budget. In accordance with Section 62 of the WMATA Compact, Metro will conduct a public hearing at the location listed in this notice. Information on the hearing will be provided in area libraries, in Metrorail stations, on Metrobus and MetroAccess vehicles, and online at www.wmata.com/budget.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation and Environment Committee
    T&E COMMITTEE #1 March 5, 2020 MEMORANDUM March 2, 2020 TO: Transportation and Environment Committee FROM: Glenn OrliI~enior Analyst SUBJECT: FY21-26 Capital Improvements Program (CIP}--transportation: mass transit and pedestrian facilities/bikeways projects, and Facility Planning-Transportation1 PURPOSE: Worksession Please bring the Executive's Recommended FY21-26 CIP to this worksession, This is the second Committee worksession scheduled to review the transportation portion of the FY21-26 CIP. This worksession will include a review of mass transit and pedestrian facilities/bikeways projects, and Facility Planning-Transportation. Staff anticipated to attend this worksession include: Chris Conklin, Director, Department of Transportation (DOT) Emil Wolanin, Deputy Director, DOT Tim Cupples, Chief, Division of Transportation Engineering, DOT Dan Hibbert, Chief, Division of Transit Services, DOT Fred Lees, Chief, Management Services, DOT Brady Goldsmith, Office of Management & Budget Sara Benson, Senior Transit Facilities Planner, WMATA Michael Hance, AECOM A. PRELIMINARIES A clarification is requested regarding the February 27 worksession. The Executive did not include PDFs for the Highway Noise Abatement and Dedicated but Unmaintained Roads projects in his Recommended FY21-26 CIP. Council staff had recommended retaining these PDFs in the CIP, but not showing funding within the six-year period. In addition, over the next two-year CIP cycle, Council staff recommends that DOT reevaluate whether the criteria for these two programs be revised or to scrap the programs altogether, and to bring its recommendations to the Council. However, at the worksession Council staff did not receive the Committee's recommendation. Council staff has requested certain short briefings as part of this worksession, noted in italics in this staff report.
    [Show full text]