Statement of Compliance Application of The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Statement of Compliance Application of The STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE APPLICATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA, REPRESENTED BY THE AUSTRALIAN EMBASSY 1601 Massachusetts Avenue, NW (Square 181, Lot 162) 1. Introduction The Commonwealth of Australia, represented by the Australian Embassy, Washington DC (the “Embassy” or the “Applicant”), proposes to remove the existing Australian chancery building at 1601 Massachusetts Avenue, NW (Square 181, Lot 162) and replace it with a new chancery building.1 The building will contain chancery office space, conference and meeting rooms, consular services, and accessory space. The replacement chancery building’s height, density, and lot occupancy will be generally consistent with that of the existing chancery building. As further detailed below, Foreign Missions Board of Zoning Adjustment (“FMBZA”) review is required for the proposed replacement chancery. The FMBZA has exclusive jurisdiction to review the proposed project pursuant to Section 206 of the Foreign Missions Act (22 USC § 4306) (the “Act”) and Subtitle X, Chapter 2 of the 2016 Zoning Regulations (“DCMR 11”), including public space approval and historic preservation approval pursuant to 11X DCMR §§ 201.8 and 203.7. The Act makes it clear that provisions of law other than the Act "shall apply to chanceries only to the extent that they are consistent with this section." 22 USC § 4306(j). Further, "[N]o act of any Federal agency shall be effective to confer or deny any benefit with respect to any foreign mission contrary to this Chapter." 22 USC § 4307. The final determination made by the FMBZA concerning the location, replacement or expansion of a chancery “shall not be subject to 1 “Chancery” is defined in the Zoning Regulations and in the Foreign Missions Act as “[t]he principal offices of a foreign mission used for diplomatic or related purposes, and annexes to such offices (including ancillary offices and support facilities), including the site and any building on such site that is used for such purposes.” 11B DCMR § 100.2; 22 USC § 4302. Board of ZoningBoard Adjustment of Zoning Adjustment District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia CASE NO.19557 Case No. 19557 EXHIBIT NO.10 10 the administrative proceedings of any other agency or official” except as provided by the Act.” 22 USC § 4306(c)(3). 2. Description of Property, Zoning History, and Existing Chancery The property at 1601 Massachusetts Avenue, NW is known as Square 181, Lot 162 (the “Site”). The Site contains approximately 30,314.914 square feet of land area (measured dimension) and is bounded on three sides by public space: 16th Street to the east, Scott Circle and Massachusetts Avenue to the south, and a public alley to the west. The First Baptist Church of the City of Washington abuts the Site to the north. The Site is located in the MU-15 zone district and is a non-contributing building within the Sixteenth Street Historic District. The Site has been used for chancery purposes since the mid-1960s. The existing chancery building was approved in BZA Order Nos. 8340 and 8665, dated September, 1965 and April, 1966, respectively. The BZA also approved an addition to the existing chancery building and a penthouse that exceeds one-third of the total roof area in BZA Order No. 11590, effective March, 1974. The existing chancery building has an overall floor area ratio of 5.35, a maximum building height of 90 feet,2 and a lot occupancy of 80%. The building contains 90 parking spaces in a below- grade parking garage accessed from a curb cut and ramp on Massachusetts Avenue, with an exit ramp onto 16th Street. The building includes one loading berth accessed from the public alley to the west of the Site. As described below, the Applicant proposes to raze the existing chancery building and replace it with a new chancery building within generally the same building envelope. 2 The SP Zoning Regulations in place when the existing chancery building was approved and constructed permitted a maximum matter-of-right non-residential density of 5.5 FAR and a maximum building height of 90 feet. The current MU-15 Zoning Regulations permit (i) a maximum matter-of-right density of 4.0 FAR (4.8 FAR with Inclusionary Zoning) of which 2.5 FAR may be devoted to non-residential use; and (ii) a maximum matter-of-right building height of 65 feet (70 feet with Inclusionary Zoning). See 10G DCMR §§ 602.1 and 603.1. 2 #51276399_v6 A full comparison of the zoning tabulations for the existing and proposed buildings is included on the Self-Certification Form included with this application. 3. Description of Proposed Use The Embassy proposes to construct a new chancery building on the Site that contains chancery office space, conference and meeting rooms, consular services, and other ancillary uses to the chancery use. The new building will reduce the existing Site density to approximately 4.32 FAR (1.04 FAR less than the existing Site density) and maintain the existing building height of 90 feet. The lot occupancy will increase slightly to approximately 86.3%, which in part is a result of extending the building footprint to the south property line, along Massachusetts Avenue and 16th Street. There will be a 1.83-foot side yard along the public alley on the west side of the Site and a 0.83-foot side yard on the east side of the Site, whereas side yards currently do not exist at the Site. The project will relocate the existing Massachusetts Avenue parking garage, and the existing 16th Street exit to the public alley, thus eliminating the existing curb cuts and reducing potential vehicular and pedestrian conflicts. The garage will include 91 vehicle parking spaces. One loading berth, one loading platform, and one service/delivery loading spaces will be provided, also accessed from the alley. A sally port to screen vehicles prior to entering the building will be located adjacent to the garage entrance ramp, also along the alley. Bicycle parking and shower/changing facilities will be provided in amounts consistent with the Zoning Regulations; however, as described below, the long-term bicycle parking spaces will be provided in a covered shelter on the Site adjacent to the building. The main entrance to the building will be from Massachusetts Avenue, with extensive landscaping in the public space along all street frontages that are consistent with the District’s vernacular and interspersed with feature Australian stone paved courtyards. A light well at the 3 #51276399_v6 southwest corner of the building, along the Massachusetts Avenue frontage, will provide natural light to the Consular Section on the lower level of the building. The plan for this light well includes a landscaped cascading water feature. The building’s roof features extensive solar panels and a green roof. The architectural drawings included in this application provide more complete information about the proposed building design, materials, and uses. 4. The proposed chancery replacement is consistent with the Foreign Missions Act and the Zoning Regulations. The Act and Subtitle X, Chapter 2 of the Zoning Regulations govern the location, replacement, and expansion of chanceries. The proposed chancery replacement in this application is consistent with both the Act and the Zoning Regulations. Because the proposed chancery replacement meets the six criteria for approval, as set forth below, the proposal should not be disapproved. A. The International Obligation of the United States. The United States has an international obligation to facilitate the provision of adequate and secure facilities for foreign missions in the Nation's Capital. See 22 USC § 4306(d)(1); D.C. Official Code § 6-1306(d)(1); 11X DCMR § 201.8(a). Favorable action by the FMBZA on this application would fulfill the international obligation of the United States. The U.S. Department of State supports the filing of this application, and will be filing a report prior to the public hearing. B. Historic Preservation, as Determined By The FMBZA. In order to ensure compatibility with historic landmarks and districts, the Act requires substantial compliance with District of Columbia and federal regulations governing historic preservation, with respect to new construction and to demolition of or alteration to historic landmarks and contributing resources within historic districts. Pursuant to FMBZA Order 4 #51276399_v6 No. 18131-A, Application of the Embassy of the People’s Republic of China, dated May 18, 2011, the FMBZA found the following: While "substantial compliance" is not defined in the Foreign Missions Act or the Zoning Regulations, in Sheridan-Kalorama Historical Ass'n. v. Christopher, 49 F.3d 750, 311 U.S. App. D.C. 16 (D.C. Cir. 1995), the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit noted that “’compliance’ with these laws is not as much a matter of meeting any specific standard as it is of submitting the proposal to the appropriate regulatory body or bodies for review and comment," 49 F.3d at 759, 311 U.S. App. D.C. at 25. In that case, the court found substantial compliance through the referral of the application to the Mayor's Agent for Historic Preservation. See also FMBZA Order No. 18049, Application of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago, dated May 14, 2010, and FMBZA Order No. 17886-A, Application of the Republic of South Africa, dated April 14, 2009. Nonetheless, the Act requires that satisfaction of the historic preservation criteria be determined by the FMBZA. This project will include the demolition of the existing Chancery building located in the Sixteenth Street Historic District. Completed in 1969, the existing Chancery is a seven-story, off- white Tennessee marble-clad, concrete, glass, and steel office building. The building is rectangular in plan. It features a flat roof with a mechanical penthouse, setback from the building line, and an underground parking facility.
Recommended publications
  • Bicycle Facilities
    COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW SHEPHERD PARK PUD WASHINGTON, DC March 11, 2016 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 15-29 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia CASE NO.15-29 DeletedEXHIBIT NO.22B Prepared by: 1140 Connecticut Avenue NW 3914 Centreville Road 15125 Washington Street Suite 600 Suite 330 Suite 136 Washington, DC 20036 Chantilly, VA 20151 Haymarket, VA 20169 Tel: 202.296.8625 Tel: 703.787.9595 Tel: 703.787.9595 Fax: 202.785.1276 Fax: 703.787.9905 Fax: 703.787.9905 www.goroveslade.com This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of services, is intended for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization by Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc., shall be without liability to Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc. Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Contents of Study .................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Study Area Overview ................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Docket/Notice of Public Hearing
    Notice of Public Hearing Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Docket B17-01: Proposed FY2018 Operating Budget and Docket B17-02: Proposed FY2018 Capital Improvement Program and Federal FY2017 Grant Applications Purpose Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority on the two dockets noted above as follows: Hearing No. 613 Monday, January 30, 2017 Metro Headquarters Building 600 Fifth Street NW Washington, DC 20001 Open House 4:30 – 6:30 p.m. Public Hearing at 5 p.m. Speaker registration is on-site only and closes at 9 p.m. Please note that this date is subject to Metro’s inclement weather cancellation policy. In the event of a cancellation, Metro will post information about a new hearing on wmata.com. The public hearing location is wheelchair accessible. Any individual who requires special assistance such as a sign language interpreter or additional accommodation to participate in the public hearing, or who requires these materials in an alternate format, should contact Danise Peña at 202-962-2511 or TTY: 202-962-2033 as soon as possible in order for Metro to make necessary arrangements. For language assistance, such as an interpreter or information in another language, please call 202-962-2582 at least 48 hours prior to the public hearing date. For more information please visit www.wmata.com/budget. In accordance with Section 62 of the WMATA Compact, Metro will conduct a public hearing at the location listed in this notice. Information on the hearing will be provided in area libraries, in Metrorail stations, on Metrobus and MetroAccess vehicles, and online at www.wmata.com/budget.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation and Environment Committee
    T&E COMMITTEE #1 March 5, 2020 MEMORANDUM March 2, 2020 TO: Transportation and Environment Committee FROM: Glenn OrliI~enior Analyst SUBJECT: FY21-26 Capital Improvements Program (CIP}--transportation: mass transit and pedestrian facilities/bikeways projects, and Facility Planning-Transportation1 PURPOSE: Worksession Please bring the Executive's Recommended FY21-26 CIP to this worksession, This is the second Committee worksession scheduled to review the transportation portion of the FY21-26 CIP. This worksession will include a review of mass transit and pedestrian facilities/bikeways projects, and Facility Planning-Transportation. Staff anticipated to attend this worksession include: Chris Conklin, Director, Department of Transportation (DOT) Emil Wolanin, Deputy Director, DOT Tim Cupples, Chief, Division of Transportation Engineering, DOT Dan Hibbert, Chief, Division of Transit Services, DOT Fred Lees, Chief, Management Services, DOT Brady Goldsmith, Office of Management & Budget Sara Benson, Senior Transit Facilities Planner, WMATA Michael Hance, AECOM A. PRELIMINARIES A clarification is requested regarding the February 27 worksession. The Executive did not include PDFs for the Highway Noise Abatement and Dedicated but Unmaintained Roads projects in his Recommended FY21-26 CIP. Council staff had recommended retaining these PDFs in the CIP, but not showing funding within the six-year period. In addition, over the next two-year CIP cycle, Council staff recommends that DOT reevaluate whether the criteria for these two programs be revised or to scrap the programs altogether, and to bring its recommendations to the Council. However, at the worksession Council staff did not receive the Committee's recommendation. Council staff has requested certain short briefings as part of this worksession, noted in italics in this staff report.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed DC Bus Changes
    FY22 Proposed Metrobus Service Changes District of Columbia FRIENDSHIP HEIGHTS-SOUTHEAST LINE – ROUTES 30N, 30S SERVICE GUIDELINE SCORES Line Benefit Score 46 Line Classification Framework Overall Grade B Activity Tier 1 AVERAGE DAILY RIDERSHIP Winter 2019-2020 Weekday Saturday Sunday Pre-Pandemic 4,947 3,774 3,795 PROPOSED CHANGES TO PRE-PANDEMIC SERVICE 1st half Fiscal Year 2022 (July-December 2021) • Eliminate service and replace with additional 31, 33 trips between downtown, Georgetown and Friendship Heights Metrorail Station, and additional 32, 36 trips between downtown, Capitol Hill and Naylor Road/Southern Ave. Metrorail stations 2nd half Fiscal Year 2022 (January-June 2022) • Continue proposed 1st half fiscal year adjustments PROPOSED SERVICE FREQUENCIES (minutes) Early Weekday Weekday Morning- FY 2022 Saturday Sunday Peak Off-Peak Late Evening (all days) July-December 2021 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A January-June 2022 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A ALTERNATIVE SERVICE 1st half Fiscal Year 2022 (July-December 2021) • Routes 31, 33 between downtown, Georgetown and Friendship Heights Metrorail Station • Routes 32, 36 between downtown, Capitol Hill and Naylor Road/Southern Ave Metrorail station 2nd half Fiscal Year 2022 (January-June 2022) • Same as 1st half of fiscal year AVERAGE DAILY RIDERSHIP Fall 2020 Weekday Saturday Sunday Total Ridership 2,092 N/A N/A Percentage affected 1 0% N/A N/A 1st Half FY 2022 Percentage affected 1 0% N/A N/A 2nd Half FY 2022 1 – Estimated percent of trips that can no longer board at the same stop using Metrobus.
    [Show full text]
  • District of Columbia: 42, 43, 74, S2, S4, S9
    DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 2019 Metrobus State of Good Operations ROUTES 42, 43 – MOUNT PLEASANT LINE BUDGET • Cost neutral PROPOSED CHANGE • During most off-peak periods (weekdays, middays and evenings; Saturdays; and Sunday mornings and afternoons), operate every-other trip as Route 43. These trips will connect Gallery Place and Mount Pleasant, operating under Dupont Circle. They will alternate with Route 42 trips serving Dupont Circle. Route 42 only would continue to operate early mornings and late nights daily, and evenings on Sundays. • Adjust the schedule to reflect traffic conditions and improve on-time performance and service reliability. • Eliminate the last round trip on weekday, Saturday and Sunday late nights due to low ridership. REASON FOR CHANGE • Respond to customer suggestions and public feedback: o This service plan was recommended in the Metrobus Service Evaluation Study: Mount Pleasant Line: 42, 43 and Connecticut Avenue Line: L1, L2 from October 2018. • Operating more trips under Dupont Circle will avoid congestion and provide faster travel time for passengers continuing past Dupont Circle in each direction. • Red Line connections will be maintained at Dupont Circle Metrorail Station on Route 42 and at Farragut North Metrorail Station on routes 42 and 43. • Adjust running time to provide a more realistic schedule and improve on-time performance and service reliability, with the goal of reaching at least 80% on-time performance in all time-periods. Recent on-time performance for the line is outlined below: December 2018-June
    [Show full text]
  • MEMORANDUM INTRODUCTION Board of Zoning Adjustment District
    1140 Connecticut Avenue NW Suite 600 Washington, DC 20036 202.296.8625 MEMORANDUM To: Jenna Jacobson Rock Creek Property Group David Avitabile Goulston & Storrs Jane Nelson Nelson Architects From: Tracy Jones-Schoenfeld Daniel Solomon Robert B. Schiesel, P.E. Daniel B. VanPelt, P.E., PTOE Date: June 9, 2017 Subject: 5 Thomas Circle – Comprehensive Transportation Review INTRODUCTION This memorandum presents a Comprehensive Transportation Review (CTR) of the proposed expansion of the National City Christian Church, located at 5 Thomas Circle in the Logan Circle neighborhood of Northwest Washington, DC. This document was prepared in support of the project’s Board of Zoning Adjustment (BZA) application. Figure 1 identifies the regional site location within the District, and Figure 2 shows an aerial of the site in relation to its near vicinity. The site is currently improved with a three-story structure occupied by the National City Christian Church. The Campbell Wing, located on the western portion of the property, currently has 39,000 square feet of space which has included a variety of uses including office, educational, and childcare. The proposed project will add two floors with approximately 21,000 additional square feet of office space to the Campbell Wing. It is anticipated that this space will be primarily leased by tenants not affiliated with the National City Christian Church. The site is located 0.3 miles from the McPherson Square Metrorail Station, which provides direct connections to areas in the District, Maryland, and Virginia. Pedestrian facilities near the site provide excellent connections to transit and other destinations. The presence of numerous bike facilities near the site, including a Capital Bikeshare station directly adjacent to the site, will increase the use of non-vehicular travel modes to and from the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Pedestrian Facilities
    COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW CHILDREN’S NATIONAL AT WALTER REED Z.C. CASES NO. 19-24 AND 19-24A: TEXT AND MAP AMENDMENT WASHINGTON, DC January 27, 2020 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia CASE NO.19-24A EXHIBIT NO.7A Prepared by: 1140 Connecticut Avenue NW 3914 Centreville Road 15125 Washington Street Suite 600 Suite 330 Suite 212 Washington, DC 20036 Chantilly, VA 20151 Haymarket, VA 20169 Tel: 202.296.8625 Tel: 703.787.9595 Tel: 571.248.0992 Fax: 202.785.1276 Fax: 703.787.9905 Fax: 703.787.9905 www.goroveslade.com This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of services, is intended for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization by Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc., shall be without liability to Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc. Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................................................................... i Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose of Study .................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Summary ...................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Silver Spring Station Capacity Analysis Study, Final Report
    SILVER SPRING Station Capacity Analysis Study Final Report Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Office of Planning April 2014 Silver Spring Metrorail Station Capacity Analysis Study Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 1.1 Background............................................................................................................................................. 5 1.2 Study Purpose ........................................................................................................................................ 7 1.3 Report Organization ................................................................................................................................ 7 2.0 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................................................ 8 2.1 Station Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Station Area and Planning Context .........................................................................................................14 2.3 Existing Station Conditions .....................................................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • Draft US 29 Mobility & Reliability Study Technical Report July 2020
    Draft US 29 Mobility & Reliability Study Technical Report July 2020 Draft This page intentionally left blank. Draft US 29 Mobility & Reliability Study Technical Report Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................... i List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................. iii List of Figures ................................................................................................................................................ iii Appendices .................................................................................................................................................. iv Introduction.................................................................................................................................................... 1 Existing Conditions ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Study Area and Study Corridor ................................................................................................................. 2 Land Use ................................................................................................................................................... 2 Population, Jobs, and Income ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Purple Line F U N C T I O N a L P L a N
    P u b l i c H e a r i n g D r a f t November 2009 purple line F u n c t i o n a l P l a n M o n t g o m e r y C o u n t y P l a n n i n g D e p a r t Pm u er pn l et L i n e F u n c t i o n a l The P l a Maryland-National n P u b l i c H e a rCa i n pitalg D rPark a f t and1 Planning Commission p u r p l e l i n e f u n c t i o n a l p l a n P u b l i c H e a r i n g D r a f t a b s t r a c t This plan for the Purple Line transit facility through Montgomery County contains route, mode, and station recommendations. It is a comprehensive amendment to the approved and adopted 1990 Georgetown Branch Master Plan Amendment. It also amends The General Plan (On Wedges and Corridors) for the Physical Development of the Maryland-Washington Regional District in Montgomery and Prince George’s Counties, as amended, the Master Plan of Highways for Montgomery County, and the Master Plan of Bikeways. s o u r c e o f c o p i e s The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission 8787 Georgia Avenue Silver Spring, MD 20910-3760 Online at: www.montgomeryplanning.org/transportation/projects/purple_line.shtm THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission is a bi-county agency created by the General Assembly of Maryland in 1927.
    [Show full text]
  • Shepherd Park Pud
    COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW SHEPHERD PARK PUD WASHINGTON, DC May 31, 2016 Prepared by: 1140 Connecticut Avenue NW 3914 Centreville Road 15125 Washington Street Suite 600 Suite 330 Suite 136 Washington, DC 20036 Chantilly, VA 20151 Haymarket, VA 20169 Tel: 202.296.8625 Tel: 703.787.9595 Tel: 703.787.9595 Fax: 202.785.1276 Fax: 703.787.9905 Fax: 703.787.9905 www.goroveslade.com This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of services, is intended for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization by Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc., shall be without liability to Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc. Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Contents of Study .................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Study Area Overview ................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Major Transportation
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Network Directory for People with Disabilities & Adults 50+
    Photos Courtesy WMATA Comprehensive Community Guide to Public, Private, and Non-Profit Transportation Transportation Network Directory for People with Disabilities & Adults 50+ September, 2020 www.montgomerycountymd.gov/tnd DON’T KNOW HOW TO GET THERE? GET WHERE YOU WANT TO GO! CALL CONNECT-A-RIDE FOR ANSWERS AND ASSISTANCE 301-738-3252 (V) 703-323-6494 (V) E-mail: [email protected] https://accessjca.org/connect-a-ride/ The Connect-A-Ride Transportation Resource Center, managed by the Jewish Council of the Aging of Greater Washington, is a free service that helps adults 50+ and people with disabilities of all ages find the transportation they need. Certified Information and Mobility Specialists help with schedules, benefits and eligibility requirements in: • Montgomery County, Maryland; • Arlington and Fairfax Counties in Virginia; and • the Virginia cities of Alexandria, Fairfax and Falls Church. If you live in one of these jurisdictions and need transportation assistance, call Connect-A-Ride at 301-738-3252 or 703-323-6494. Connect-A-Ride receives grant funding from Montgomery County Government. Connect-A-Ride also offers the following programs and services: Ride Smart Workshops Offered periodically, these workshops help small groups of older adults learn to use public transportation options and otherwise navigate the National Capital Region. Registration is required for Ride Smart workshops. Call 301-738-3252 (V) to register or for more information or email [email protected]. Escorted Transportation This program serves residents of Montgomery County who are eligible based on income and disability. Customers must require assistance due to physical, cognitive or emotional impairment. The program assists with transportation to medical appointments, grocery stores and other destinations.
    [Show full text]