DOCSLIB.ORG

MEMORANDUM INTRODUCTION Board of Zoning Adjustment District

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MEMORANDUM INTRODUCTION Board of Zoning Adjustment District 1140 Connecticut Avenue NW Suite 600 Washington, DC 20036 202.296.8625 MEMORANDUM To: Amanda Thomas Cushman & Wakefield Paul Samala Gensler Christine A. Roddy Goulston & Storrs From: Tracy Jones-Schoenfeld Robert B. Schiesel, P.E. Daniel B. VanPelt, P.E., PTOE Date: April 18, 2017 Subject: Middle East Institute – Comprehensive Transportation Review INTRODUCTION This memorandum presents a Comprehensive Transportation Review (CTR) of the proposed expansion of the Middle East Institute (MEI), located at 1761-1763 N Street in the Dupont Circle neighborhood of Northwest Washington, DC. This document was prepared in support of the project’s Board of Zoning Adjustment (BZA) application. Figure 1 identifies the regional site location within the District, and Figure 2 identifies the location of the site in relation to the neighborhood. The site is currently improved with a three-story structure occupied by the Middle East Institute. The proposed project will retain the existing historic building along N Street NW and include a 10,787 square foot addition to the rear of the existing building, including a conference center and a language center, as approved by the Historic Preservation Review Board in November 2016. In addition to traditional office work, the MEI also hosts regular language classes and conferences. The MEI currently has 25 full-time staff, and 15 teachers in the evening. The bulk of the events that the MEI holds includes talks and panels that are held over lunch time once a week, and range in size from 25 to 80 attendees. All language classes are hosted in the evening from 6:15pm – 8:45pm on Monday and Wednesdays or Tuesday and Thursdays. Classes are not offered during the work day, on weekends, or on Fridays. There is a maximum of seven (7) classes each evening with a maximum of seven (7) students in each class. The proposed expansion will not significantly add to the number of staff or teachers on site, nor will it alter the way in which events and classes are scheduled. The majority of staff and attendees take transit, bike, or walk to and from the site, and are expected to continue to do so. The site is located less than 0.2 miles from the Dupont Circle Metrorail Station which provides direct connection to areas in the District and Maryland along with interchanges to Virginia, as well as direct access to Union Station and the District core. Pedestrian facilities near the site provide excellent connections to transit and other destinations. The presence of numerous bike facilities near the site will increase the use of non-vehicular travel modes to and from the site. The purpose of this memorandum is to: ▪ Provide a summary of the proposed development program, including existing site conditions and details on the proposed expansion plans. Board of ZoningBoard Adjustment of Zoning Adjustment Transportation Planners and Engineers District of ColumbiaDistrictwww.goroveslade.com of Columbia CASE NO.19500 Case No. 19500 EXHIBIT NO.32 32 Middle East Institute BZA – Comprehensive Transportation Review Page 2 April 18, 2017 ▪ Review the major transportation elements of the site plan, namely a review of pedestrian and bicycle facilities in the vicinity of the site; a review of transit facilities near the site; and parking accommodations, including curbside management and a review of available public parking near the site. ▪ Provide a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) plan, for staff and employees. ▪ Provide a Large Events Transportation plan, for events that have an attendance that exceeds 100 individuals. The following conclusions were made regarding the proposed expansion of the Middle East Institute: ▪ The site is surrounded by an extensive network of transit, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities that results in an excellent environment for safe and effective non-auto transportation; ▪ Given the site’s excellent access to numerous modes of transportation, minimal vehicular parking is anticipated to be necessary to serve the programmatic needs of the development; ▪ The amount of parking generated by the expansion can easily be accommodated in the public parking supply in parking garages close to the building; ▪ The planned expansion of the Middle East Institute will not significantly alter the number of staff or the way in which events are held under existing conditions. Site access, trip generation, and parking demand are anticipated to remain the same as they are under existing conditions; and ▪ A robust TDM plan will encourage non-auto use by employees and visitors of the Middle East Institute, further reducing the needs to provide on-site parking. EXISTING CONDITIONS This section provides a review of the existing transit, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities in the vicinity of the site. The site is served by several public transportation sources, including Metrorail, Metrobus, and the DC Circulator bus system. The project site is also served by a pedestrian network consisting of sidewalks and crosswalks along the streets surrounding the project site. Additionally, the site is served by an on-street bicycle network, consisting of bike lanes, shared lanes, and signed bicycle routes. Transit The development is well-served by numerous public transit options in close proximity to the site. Local transit services that provide access to the Middle East Institute site include Metrorail, Metrobus, and the DC Circulator. These services are operated by the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) and DDOT. WMATA operates Metrorail, the nation’s second largest heavy rail transit system, as well as Metrobus, the nation's fifth largest bus network. DDOT and WMATA collaborate to operate the DC Circulator, a system of six (6) bus lines that provide frequent service and low fares throughout the city. The Dupont Circle Metrorail Station is located 0.2 miles from the development and is served by the Red Line, which provides direct connections to areas in the District and Maryland along with interchanges to Virginia. The Red Line connects Shady Grove with Glenmont while providing access to the District core in a “U” shape. Red Line trains run approximately every three to six minutes during the morning and afternoon peak hours. The Red Line runs about every 12 minutes during weekday non- peak hours, every 15-18 minutes on weekday evenings after 9:30 pm and 12 to 15 minutes on the weekends. Gorove/Slade www.goroveslade.com Middle East Institute BZA – Comprehensive Transportation Review Page 3 April 18, 2017 Additionally, the Farragut West Metrorail Station is located 0.5 miles from the development and is served by the Blue, Orange, and Silver Lines. The Blue Line travels north from Springfield, VA to Rosslyn then continues east to Largo, MD. Trains run approximately every 12 minutes during the morning and afternoon peak periods. They run about every 12 minutes during weekday non-peak periods, every 20 minutes on weekday evenings after 9:30pm, and every 12-20 minutes on weekends. The Orange Line travels east from Fairfax, VA to New Carrollton, MD. Trains run approximately every 6 minutes during the morning and afternoon peak periods. They run about every 12 minutes during weekday non-peak periods, every 20 minutes during weekday evenings after 9:30pm, and every 12-20 minutes on weekends. The Silver Line travels east from Reston, VA to Largo, MD. Trains run approximately every 6 minutes during the morning and afternoon peak periods, every 12 minutes during weekday non-peak periods, every 20 minutes during weekday evenings after 9:30pm, and every 12-20 minutes on weekends. Figure 3 identifies the major transit routes, stations, and stops in the study area. Seventeen (17) bus routes are located within a quarter-mile walk from the site. Five (5) bus stops serving these routes are located within a quarter-mile of the site, with two (2) of the stops located within one block of the site. Table 1 shows a summary of the bus route information for the lines that serve the study area, including service hours and headways. Table 1: Bus Route Information Route Line Name Service Hours Headway Number Monday – Saturday: 4:30 am – 3:00 am 42,43 Mount Pleasant Line 10-30 min Sunday: 4:30 am – 1:00 am Weekdays: 7:10AM – 9:42AM 8-10 min D1 Glover Park – Franklin Square Line 4:40PM – 7:18PM 30 min Weekdays: 5:34AM – 1:41AM 10-40 min D2 Glover Park – Dupont Circle Line Saturday: 6:33AM – 1:52AM 20-40 min Sunday: 6:47AM – 12:19AM 20-30 min Weekdays: 4:10AM – 2:42AM 15-30 min D6 Sibley Hospital – Stadium-Armory Line Saturday: 4:45AM – 2:14AM 30-45 min Sunday: 5:15AM – 1:19AM 30-40 min Monday – Saturday: 5:10 am – 1:25 am G2 P Street-LeDroit Park Line 15-30 min Sunday: 6:30 am – 12:20 am Weekdays: 6:30 am – 9:00 am H1 Brookland-Potomac Park Line 30 min 4:15 pm – 6:15 pm Weekdays: 5:00 am – 12:15 am L1,L2 Connecticut Avenue Line Saturdays: 5:45 am – 1:00 am 10-30 min Sundays: 6:00 am – 1:00 am Monday – Saturday: 5:10 am – 1:25 am N2,N4,N6 Massachusetts Avenue Line 15-30 min Sunday: 6:30 am – 12:20 am Northbound: 5:42 am – 10:04 am 10-15 min S1 16th Street-Potomac Park Line Southbound: 3:58 pm – 7:42 pm 10-15 min Weekdays: 4:40 am – 3:00 am 5-20 min S2,S4 16th Street Line Saturdays: 4:15 am – 2:54 am 10-15 min Sundays: 4:33 am – 1:40 am 10-15 min Weekdays: 7:10AM – 9:42AM 8-10 min S9 16th Street Limited Line 4:40PM – 7:18PM 30 min DC Sunday – Thursday: 7:00 am - 12:00 am Dupont Circle-Georgetown-Rosslyn Line 10 min Circulator Friday and Saturday: 7:00 am - 3:30 am Gorove/Slade www.goroveslade.com Middle East Institute BZA – Comprehensive Transportation Review Page 4 April 18, 2017 Bicycle Facilities The site is well connected to existing on-street bicycle facilities.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Statement of Compliance Application of The
    STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE APPLICATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA, REPRESENTED BY THE AUSTRALIAN EMBASSY 1601 Massachusetts Avenue, NW (Square 181, Lot 162) 1. Introduction The Commonwealth of Australia, represented by the Australian Embassy, Washington DC (the “Embassy” or the “Applicant”), proposes to remove the existing Australian chancery building at 1601 Massachusetts Avenue, NW (Square 181, Lot 162) and replace it with a new chancery building.1 The building will contain chancery office space, conference and meeting rooms, consular services, and accessory space. The replacement chancery building’s height, density, and lot occupancy will be generally consistent with that of the existing chancery building. As further detailed below, Foreign Missions Board of Zoning Adjustment (“FMBZA”) review is required for the proposed replacement chancery. The FMBZA has exclusive jurisdiction to review the proposed project pursuant to Section 206 of the Foreign Missions Act (22 USC § 4306) (the “Act”) and Subtitle X, Chapter 2 of the 2016 Zoning Regulations (“DCMR 11”), including public space approval and historic preservation approval pursuant to 11X DCMR §§ 201.8 and 203.7. The Act makes it clear that provisions of law other than the Act "shall apply to chanceries only to the extent that they are consistent with this section." 22 USC § 4306(j). Further, "[N]o act of any Federal agency shall be effective to confer or deny any benefit with respect to any foreign mission contrary to this Chapter." 22 USC § 4307. The final determination made by the FMBZA concerning the location, replacement or expansion of a chancery “shall not be subject to 1 “Chancery” is defined in the Zoning Regulations and in the Foreign Missions Act as “[t]he principal offices of a foreign mission used for diplomatic or related purposes, and annexes to such offices (including ancillary offices and support facilities), including the site and any building on such site that is used for such purposes.” 11B DCMR § 100.2; 22 USC § 4302.
    [Show full text]
  • Bicycle Facilities
    COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW SHEPHERD PARK PUD WASHINGTON, DC March 11, 2016 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 15-29 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia CASE NO.15-29 DeletedEXHIBIT NO.22B Prepared by: 1140 Connecticut Avenue NW 3914 Centreville Road 15125 Washington Street Suite 600 Suite 330 Suite 136 Washington, DC 20036 Chantilly, VA 20151 Haymarket, VA 20169 Tel: 202.296.8625 Tel: 703.787.9595 Tel: 703.787.9595 Fax: 202.785.1276 Fax: 703.787.9905 Fax: 703.787.9905 www.goroveslade.com This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of services, is intended for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization by Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc., shall be without liability to Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc. Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Contents of Study .................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Study Area Overview ................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Docket/Notice of Public Hearing
    Notice of Public Hearing Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Docket B17-01: Proposed FY2018 Operating Budget and Docket B17-02: Proposed FY2018 Capital Improvement Program and Federal FY2017 Grant Applications Purpose Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority on the two dockets noted above as follows: Hearing No. 613 Monday, January 30, 2017 Metro Headquarters Building 600 Fifth Street NW Washington, DC 20001 Open House 4:30 – 6:30 p.m. Public Hearing at 5 p.m. Speaker registration is on-site only and closes at 9 p.m. Please note that this date is subject to Metro’s inclement weather cancellation policy. In the event of a cancellation, Metro will post information about a new hearing on wmata.com. The public hearing location is wheelchair accessible. Any individual who requires special assistance such as a sign language interpreter or additional accommodation to participate in the public hearing, or who requires these materials in an alternate format, should contact Danise Peña at 202-962-2511 or TTY: 202-962-2033 as soon as possible in order for Metro to make necessary arrangements. For language assistance, such as an interpreter or information in another language, please call 202-962-2582 at least 48 hours prior to the public hearing date. For more information please visit www.wmata.com/budget. In accordance with Section 62 of the WMATA Compact, Metro will conduct a public hearing at the location listed in this notice. Information on the hearing will be provided in area libraries, in Metrorail stations, on Metrobus and MetroAccess vehicles, and online at www.wmata.com/budget.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation and Environment Committee
    T&E COMMITTEE #1 March 5, 2020 MEMORANDUM March 2, 2020 TO: Transportation and Environment Committee FROM: Glenn OrliI~enior Analyst SUBJECT: FY21-26 Capital Improvements Program (CIP}--transportation: mass transit and pedestrian facilities/bikeways projects, and Facility Planning-Transportation1 PURPOSE: Worksession Please bring the Executive's Recommended FY21-26 CIP to this worksession, This is the second Committee worksession scheduled to review the transportation portion of the FY21-26 CIP. This worksession will include a review of mass transit and pedestrian facilities/bikeways projects, and Facility Planning-Transportation. Staff anticipated to attend this worksession include: Chris Conklin, Director, Department of Transportation (DOT) Emil Wolanin, Deputy Director, DOT Tim Cupples, Chief, Division of Transportation Engineering, DOT Dan Hibbert, Chief, Division of Transit Services, DOT Fred Lees, Chief, Management Services, DOT Brady Goldsmith, Office of Management & Budget Sara Benson, Senior Transit Facilities Planner, WMATA Michael Hance, AECOM A. PRELIMINARIES A clarification is requested regarding the February 27 worksession. The Executive did not include PDFs for the Highway Noise Abatement and Dedicated but Unmaintained Roads projects in his Recommended FY21-26 CIP. Council staff had recommended retaining these PDFs in the CIP, but not showing funding within the six-year period. In addition, over the next two-year CIP cycle, Council staff recommends that DOT reevaluate whether the criteria for these two programs be revised or to scrap the programs altogether, and to bring its recommendations to the Council. However, at the worksession Council staff did not receive the Committee's recommendation. Council staff has requested certain short briefings as part of this worksession, noted in italics in this staff report.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed DC Bus Changes
    FY22 Proposed Metrobus Service Changes District of Columbia FRIENDSHIP HEIGHTS-SOUTHEAST LINE – ROUTES 30N, 30S SERVICE GUIDELINE SCORES Line Benefit Score 46 Line Classification Framework Overall Grade B Activity Tier 1 AVERAGE DAILY RIDERSHIP Winter 2019-2020 Weekday Saturday Sunday Pre-Pandemic 4,947 3,774 3,795 PROPOSED CHANGES TO PRE-PANDEMIC SERVICE 1st half Fiscal Year 2022 (July-December 2021) • Eliminate service and replace with additional 31, 33 trips between downtown, Georgetown and Friendship Heights Metrorail Station, and additional 32, 36 trips between downtown, Capitol Hill and Naylor Road/Southern Ave. Metrorail stations 2nd half Fiscal Year 2022 (January-June 2022) • Continue proposed 1st half fiscal year adjustments PROPOSED SERVICE FREQUENCIES (minutes) Early Weekday Weekday Morning- FY 2022 Saturday Sunday Peak Off-Peak Late Evening (all days) July-December 2021 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A January-June 2022 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A ALTERNATIVE SERVICE 1st half Fiscal Year 2022 (July-December 2021) • Routes 31, 33 between downtown, Georgetown and Friendship Heights Metrorail Station • Routes 32, 36 between downtown, Capitol Hill and Naylor Road/Southern Ave Metrorail station 2nd half Fiscal Year 2022 (January-June 2022) • Same as 1st half of fiscal year AVERAGE DAILY RIDERSHIP Fall 2020 Weekday Saturday Sunday Total Ridership 2,092 N/A N/A Percentage affected 1 0% N/A N/A 1st Half FY 2022 Percentage affected 1 0% N/A N/A 2nd Half FY 2022 1 – Estimated percent of trips that can no longer board at the same stop using Metrobus.
    [Show full text]
  • District of Columbia: 42, 43, 74, S2, S4, S9
    DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 2019 Metrobus State of Good Operations ROUTES 42, 43 – MOUNT PLEASANT LINE BUDGET • Cost neutral PROPOSED CHANGE • During most off-peak periods (weekdays, middays and evenings; Saturdays; and Sunday mornings and afternoons), operate every-other trip as Route 43. These trips will connect Gallery Place and Mount Pleasant, operating under Dupont Circle. They will alternate with Route 42 trips serving Dupont Circle. Route 42 only would continue to operate early mornings and late nights daily, and evenings on Sundays. • Adjust the schedule to reflect traffic conditions and improve on-time performance and service reliability. • Eliminate the last round trip on weekday, Saturday and Sunday late nights due to low ridership. REASON FOR CHANGE • Respond to customer suggestions and public feedback: o This service plan was recommended in the Metrobus Service Evaluation Study: Mount Pleasant Line: 42, 43 and Connecticut Avenue Line: L1, L2 from October 2018. • Operating more trips under Dupont Circle will avoid congestion and provide faster travel time for passengers continuing past Dupont Circle in each direction. • Red Line connections will be maintained at Dupont Circle Metrorail Station on Route 42 and at Farragut North Metrorail Station on routes 42 and 43. • Adjust running time to provide a more realistic schedule and improve on-time performance and service reliability, with the goal of reaching at least 80% on-time performance in all time-periods. Recent on-time performance for the line is outlined below: December 2018-June
    [Show full text]
  • MEMORANDUM INTRODUCTION Board of Zoning Adjustment District
    1140 Connecticut Avenue NW Suite 600 Washington, DC 20036 202.296.8625 MEMORANDUM To: Jenna Jacobson Rock Creek Property Group David Avitabile Goulston & Storrs Jane Nelson Nelson Architects From: Tracy Jones-Schoenfeld Daniel Solomon Robert B. Schiesel, P.E. Daniel B. VanPelt, P.E., PTOE Date: June 9, 2017 Subject: 5 Thomas Circle – Comprehensive Transportation Review INTRODUCTION This memorandum presents a Comprehensive Transportation Review (CTR) of the proposed expansion of the National City Christian Church, located at 5 Thomas Circle in the Logan Circle neighborhood of Northwest Washington, DC. This document was prepared in support of the project’s Board of Zoning Adjustment (BZA) application. Figure 1 identifies the regional site location within the District, and Figure 2 shows an aerial of the site in relation to its near vicinity. The site is currently improved with a three-story structure occupied by the National City Christian Church. The Campbell Wing, located on the western portion of the property, currently has 39,000 square feet of space which has included a variety of uses including office, educational, and childcare. The proposed project will add two floors with approximately 21,000 additional square feet of office space to the Campbell Wing. It is anticipated that this space will be primarily leased by tenants not affiliated with the National City Christian Church. The site is located 0.3 miles from the McPherson Square Metrorail Station, which provides direct connections to areas in the District, Maryland, and Virginia. Pedestrian facilities near the site provide excellent connections to transit and other destinations. The presence of numerous bike facilities near the site, including a Capital Bikeshare station directly adjacent to the site, will increase the use of non-vehicular travel modes to and from the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Pedestrian Facilities
    COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW CHILDREN’S NATIONAL AT WALTER REED Z.C. CASES NO. 19-24 AND 19-24A: TEXT AND MAP AMENDMENT WASHINGTON, DC January 27, 2020 ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia CASE NO.19-24A EXHIBIT NO.7A Prepared by: 1140 Connecticut Avenue NW 3914 Centreville Road 15125 Washington Street Suite 600 Suite 330 Suite 212 Washington, DC 20036 Chantilly, VA 20151 Haymarket, VA 20169 Tel: 202.296.8625 Tel: 703.787.9595 Tel: 571.248.0992 Fax: 202.785.1276 Fax: 703.787.9905 Fax: 703.787.9905 www.goroveslade.com This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of services, is intended for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization by Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc., shall be without liability to Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc. Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................................................................... i Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose of Study .................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Summary ...................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Silver Spring Station Capacity Analysis Study, Final Report
    SILVER SPRING Station Capacity Analysis Study Final Report Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Office of Planning April 2014 Silver Spring Metrorail Station Capacity Analysis Study Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 1.1 Background............................................................................................................................................. 5 1.2 Study Purpose ........................................................................................................................................ 7 1.3 Report Organization ................................................................................................................................ 7 2.0 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................................................ 8 2.1 Station Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Station Area and Planning Context .........................................................................................................14 2.3 Existing Station Conditions .....................................................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • Draft US 29 Mobility & Reliability Study Technical Report July 2020
    Draft US 29 Mobility & Reliability Study Technical Report July 2020 Draft This page intentionally left blank. Draft US 29 Mobility & Reliability Study Technical Report Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................... i List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................. iii List of Figures ................................................................................................................................................ iii Appendices .................................................................................................................................................. iv Introduction.................................................................................................................................................... 1 Existing Conditions ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Study Area and Study Corridor ................................................................................................................. 2 Land Use ................................................................................................................................................... 2 Population, Jobs, and Income ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Purple Line F U N C T I O N a L P L a N
    P u b l i c H e a r i n g D r a f t November 2009 purple line F u n c t i o n a l P l a n M o n t g o m e r y C o u n t y P l a n n i n g D e p a r t Pm u er pn l et L i n e F u n c t i o n a l The P l a Maryland-National n P u b l i c H e a rCa i n pitalg D rPark a f t and1 Planning Commission p u r p l e l i n e f u n c t i o n a l p l a n P u b l i c H e a r i n g D r a f t a b s t r a c t This plan for the Purple Line transit facility through Montgomery County contains route, mode, and station recommendations. It is a comprehensive amendment to the approved and adopted 1990 Georgetown Branch Master Plan Amendment. It also amends The General Plan (On Wedges and Corridors) for the Physical Development of the Maryland-Washington Regional District in Montgomery and Prince George’s Counties, as amended, the Master Plan of Highways for Montgomery County, and the Master Plan of Bikeways. s o u r c e o f c o p i e s The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission 8787 Georgia Avenue Silver Spring, MD 20910-3760 Online at: www.montgomeryplanning.org/transportation/projects/purple_line.shtm THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission is a bi-county agency created by the General Assembly of Maryland in 1927.
    [Show full text]
  • Shepherd Park Pud
    COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW SHEPHERD PARK PUD WASHINGTON, DC May 31, 2016 Prepared by: 1140 Connecticut Avenue NW 3914 Centreville Road 15125 Washington Street Suite 600 Suite 330 Suite 136 Washington, DC 20036 Chantilly, VA 20151 Haymarket, VA 20169 Tel: 202.296.8625 Tel: 703.787.9595 Tel: 703.787.9595 Fax: 202.785.1276 Fax: 703.787.9905 Fax: 703.787.9905 www.goroveslade.com This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of services, is intended for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization by Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc., shall be without liability to Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc. Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Contents of Study .................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Study Area Overview ................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Major Transportation
    [Show full text]