Bamboo Shoots Historical Backgrounders

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bamboo Shoots Historical Backgrounders Grade 5 Grade 9 Historical Backgrounders Acknowledgements & Copyright © 2015 Province of British Columbia This resource was developed for the Ministry of International Trade and Minister Responsible for Asia Pacific Strategy and Multiculturalism by Open School BC, Ministry of Education in partnership with the Royal BC Museum, the Legacy Initiatives Advisory Council and BC teachers. A full list of contributors to Bamboo Shoots: Chinese Canadian Legacies in BC can be found at www.openschool.bc.ca/bambooshoots. Historical Backgrounders Contents CONTENTS Chinese Immigration to Canada �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������4 BC Gold Rushes – 1858 to 1870s .................................................................................................................13 Victoria – An Early History ..............................................................................................................................16 Physical Segregation of Chinese Canadians – Chinatowns ������������������������������������������������������������19 Chinese Disenfranchisement – 1872 �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������22 Building of the Canadian Pacific Railway – 1880 to 1885 ...............................................................25 Yip Sang and the Wing Sang Company.....................................................................................................28 Chinese Immigration Act (Head Tax) – 1885 .......................................................................................30 Chinese Canadian Community Associations and Organizations �����������������������������������������������32 Anti-Asian Riots in Vancouver – 1907 .......................................................................................................34 Chinese Freemasons in Canada .....................................................................................................................37 Chinese Immigration Act (Chinese Exclusion Act) – 1923 �����������������������������������������������������������40 Chinese Participation in World War II – 1939 to 1945 ...................................................................42 Chinese Immigration Act (Chinese Exclusion Act) Repealed – 1947 ................................... 44 Canadian Citizenship Act – 1947 .................................................................................................................46 Fair Employment Practices Act – 1956 .....................................................................................................47 Douglas Jung (鄭天華) ........................................................................................................................................49 Chinese Adjustment Statement Program – 1960 �������������������������������������������������������������������������������51 Universal Immigration Policy – 1967............................................................................................................54 Official Multiculturalism Policy – 1971 ........................................................................................................56 Canadian Parliamentary Recognition – 1980 .........................................................................................58 Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms – 1982 ...........................................................................59 David Lam (林思齊) .............................................................................................................................................61 Federal Government Apology for the Chinese Head Tax – 2006 ..........................................63 BC Apology to Chinese Canadians for Historical Wrongs – 2014 ������������������������������������������65 www.openschool.bc.ca/bambooshoots/ 3 Historical Backgrounders Chinese Immigration to Canada Chinese Immigration to Canada Summary • Chinese workers landed in Nuu-chah-nulth territory in 1788 as part of Capt. John Meares’ expedition to build the first year-round, non-indigenous settlement in the place the British named “Nootka Sound.” • Chinese migrants came to the colony of British Columbia right after gold was discovered in 1858. • Between 1881 and 1884, an estimated 15,000 Chinese labourers were brought to Canada to build the Canadian Pacific Railway. • The Chinese Head Tax was passed in 1885, charging each Chinese who arrived in Canada $50. In 1900, the head tax was increased to $100 and then again to $500 per person in 1903. Still over 97,000 Chinese immigrated to Canada between 1885 and 1923. • The Chinese Immigration Act of 1923 excluded all Chinese from entering Canada except for diplomats, foreign students, and those permitted under special circumstance. • After the repeal of the Exclusion Act in 1947, it was still difficult for Chinese to enter Canada due to poor diplomatic relations between Canada and China, and strict immigration policies of the Peoples Republic of China. • Racial preferences were removed from Canadian immigration policy in 1967. • The 1967 “points system” assessed potential immigrants according to the overall need for their profession in Canada, and gave more points for higher education level as well as for the reunification with existing family members in Canada. • Political unrest in Hong Kong in the late 1960s led many Hong Kong Chinese to immigrate to Canada in the 1970s. • Between 1999 and 2009, the largest number of immigrants to Canada originated from the People’s Republic of China. 4 www.openschool.bc.ca/bambooshoots/ Historical Backgrounders Chinese Immigration to Canada Backgrounder Chinese migrants have been coming to the traditional First Nations territories that are now known as British Columbia for as long as European migrants have. During the period when expeditions led by Capt. James Cook and Capt. George Vancouver surveyed—and claimed for the British crown—the coastline of modern-day British Columbia, Chinese workers landed in Nuu-chah-nulth territory. In 1788, they came as part of Capt. John Meares’ expedition to build the first year-round, non-indigenous settlement in the place the British named “Nootka Sound.” Indeed, Chinese workers were the carpenters that built the fort, grew food, and performed much of the essential labour in this settlement. “Gold rushes” in the mid-19th century drew migrants from around the world to alluvial deposits of gold around the edges of the Pacific basin: the territory of California, the Australian colonies, Aoteroa/New Zealand, and what the British crown claimed—right after gold was discovered in 1858—as the Colony of British Columbia. Chinese migrants were a significant element in all of these gold rushes. They often performed necessary functions such as growing food and building infrastructure, as well as importing goods drawn from their extensive trans-Pacific trade networks. Known for creating businesses that provided important services to miners and other migrants, the Chinese were entrepreneurial and able to make money in ways that extended well beyond finding gold. Indeed, in the Cantonese language that these migrants spoke, all of these locations came to be known as “Gum San 金山” (Gold Mountain) not just because of the iconic presence of gold, but also metaphorically for the tremendous wealth that could be created by young ambitious men crossing the seas to work in these places, a mythic name for trans- Pacific migration in search of opportunity that long outlasted the gold rushes themselves. A dream of wealth and a better life created a sustained process of migration—generation after generation. They came from a small number of villages in just eight counties in Guangdong province, on the south coast of China. Often working alongside, and sometimes marrying into First Nations communities up the Fraser River and throughout British Columbia, the migrants, who were mainly men, sought a better livelihood through building early industries. These included market farming, logging, fishing, ranching, and mining, as well as providing services through businesses such as general stores, cafés, and laundries. www.openschool.bc.ca/bambooshoots/ 5 Historical Backgrounders Chinese Immigration to Canada The history of outmigration from southern China had existed for centuries. Since the 16th century, migrants who travelled by sea throughout Southeast Asia had connected the coastal regions of Guangdong and Fujian provinces. For centuries, these migrants left rural villages and became labourers, merchants, traders, and small shopkeepers. Millions of these migrants and their descendants lived across Southeast Asia. The main ports through which these migrants travelled back and forth were Guangzhou, Amoy (now known as Xiamen), Swatow (now known as Shantou), and Macau. During the same time, many Europeans came to trade for Chinese goods such as porcelain, silk, and tea at the port of Guangzhou, as Europeans created colonies in southeast Asia in the Philippines, the East Indies (now known as Indonesia), the Malay peninsula (now known as Malaysia), and India. Migrants from southern China travelled the same trade routes as Europeans and others in the region (such as Muslim traders), trading for Chinese manufacturers and for spice, sugar, silver, and other goods. By the time of the Opium War between Britain and China, from 1840–1842, the trade that went through Guangzhou and Southeast Asia to Europe was at the center of the global
Recommended publications
  • Flooding the Border: Development, Politics, and Environmental Controversy in the Canadian-U.S
    FLOODING THE BORDER: DEVELOPMENT, POLITICS, AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROVERSY IN THE CANADIAN-U.S. SKAGIT VALLEY by Philip Van Huizen A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in The Faculty of Graduate Studies (History) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) June 2013 © Philip Van Huizen, 2013 Abstract This dissertation is a case study of the 1926 to 1984 High Ross Dam Controversy, one of the longest cross-border disputes between Canada and the United States. The controversy can be divided into two parts. The first, which lasted until the early 1960s, revolved around Seattle’s attempts to build the High Ross Dam and flood nearly twenty kilometres into British Columbia’s Skagit River Valley. British Columbia favoured Seattle’s plan but competing priorities repeatedly delayed the province’s agreement. The city was forced to build a lower, 540-foot version of the Ross Dam instead, to the immense frustration of Seattle officials. British Columbia eventually agreed to let Seattle raise the Ross Dam by 122.5 feet in 1967. Following the agreement, however, activists from Vancouver and Seattle, joined later by the Upper Skagit, Sauk-Suiattle, and Swinomish Tribal Communities in Washington, organized a massive environmental protest against the plan, causing a second phase of controversy that lasted into the 1980s. Canadian and U.S. diplomats and politicians finally resolved the dispute with the 1984 Skagit River Treaty. British Columbia agreed to sell Seattle power produced in other areas of the province, which, ironically, required raising a different dam on the Pend d’Oreille River in exchange for not raising the Ross Dam.
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of Nuu-Chah-Nulth Culture History
    SINCE KWATYAT LIVED ON EARTH: AN EXAMINATION OF NUU-CHAH-NULTH CULTURE HISTORY Alan D. McMillan B.A., University of Saskatchewan M.A., University of British Columbia THESIS SUBMI'ITED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of Archaeology O Alan D. McMillan SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY January 1996 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. APPROVAL Name: Alan D. McMillan Degree Doctor of Philosophy Title of Thesis Since Kwatyat Lived on Earth: An Examination of Nuu-chah-nulth Culture History Examining Committe: Chair: J. Nance Roy L. Carlson Senior Supervisor Philip M. Hobler David V. Burley Internal External Examiner Madonna L. Moss Department of Anthropology, University of Oregon External Examiner Date Approved: krb,,,) 1s lwb PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENSE I hereby grant to Simon Fraser University the right to lend my thesis, project or extended essay (the title of which is shown below) to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. I further agree that permission for multiple copying of this work for scholarly purposes may be granted by me or the Dean of Graduate Studies. It is understood that copying or publication of this work for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Nativism and the Decline in Civil Liberties
    NATIVISM AND THE DECLINE IN CIVIL LIBERTIES: REACTIONS OF WHITE AMERICA TOWARD THE JAPANESE IMMIGRANTS, 1885–1945 Jonathon P. O’Neal Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in the Department of History Indiana University December 2009 Accepted by the Faculty of Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. ______________________________ Michael Snodgrass, Ph.D., Chair ______________________________ Kevin Cramer, Ph.D. Master’s Thesis Committee ______________________________ Marianne S. Wokeck, Ph.D. ii Dedication I would like to dedicate this thesis to my wife: Stephanie O’Neal You are the light that reminds me there is always hope for a brighter day. iii Acknowledgements My life as a graduate student has taken many unexpected turns over the past eight years. I received my undergraduate degree in English from Indiana State University. I swore when I finished my Bachelors degree that I would never take another college course again. Little did I know I would eventually grow bored with full-time employment and nothing else. My life as a student started when I was four years old, but in 2001, I found myself in unfamiliar territory. Because of this, and the fact that the Indiana University would pay for a great deal of my education, I decided to go back to school. I have to thank the Indiana University School of Medicine’s Admissions Office for employing me for the last eight years and working around my school schedule so that I could complete my Master of Arts degree.
    [Show full text]
  • The Purpose of C-6 Is to Create One Class of Canadian. Unless Amended, the Bill Will Not Achieve Its Objective
    The purpose of C-6 is to create one class of Canadian. Unless amended, the Bill will not achieve its objective. Preamble: “A Canadian is a Canadian is a Canadian.” –Justin Trudeau, acceptance speech as Prime Minister, October 19, 2015. “We believe very strongly that there should be only one class of Canadians, that all Canadians are equal, that a Canadian is a Canadian is a Canadian from coast to coast to coast.” –John McCallum, Citizenship Minister, February 3, 2016. Fabulous words. Now let’s make it a reality. Bill C-6, as written, is but a start- it doesn’t get Canada to the Promised Land. If passed into law, unequal rights will continue, resulting in different classes of Canadian citizen- some with more rights than others. There will also be people denied citizenship altogether due to ongoing discrimination within the Act. My point in the following discussion is to exemplify the confusion and unjust legislation that bonds us together as Canadians. Trying to explain our current citizenship act is easy vs. deciding who under the law qualifies to call themselves Canadians, and why. For example, Canadian citizenship as we know it is an amalgamation of all the previous citizenship and immigration legislation going back more than 100 years. As such, the current Act is not a complete code for citizenship and nationality in that certain provisions of the 1947 Act must still be read as unrepealed. The authority for this is the Interpretation Act 1985 (44[h]), which specifies that provisions of a repealed Act must be read as unrepealed if those provisions are required to give effect to the Current Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Douglas Jung ''Canadian, Not Politician' at Campus Speech
    BE YOU CAN GLAD COME VOL. XLI THEVANCOUVER UBYSSEY, B.C., THURSDAY, OCTOBER 23, 1958 No. 15 ASUS Gathering Fails-No Quorum The Arts and Science Under­ graduate Society general meet­ ing Wednesday was unable to conduct any business because they failed to get a quorum. Less than 50 students turned out for the meeting which was to discuss the new constitution radified by the AMS Monday. The society must have 100 members at a general meeting for any business to be conduct­ ed. Mike Brown, ASUS president, stated following the 3 minute meeting that another general meeting would be called for Tuesday, October 28. The constitution will be dis­ cussed at that time providing over 100 students turn out. Membership for ASUS is open to all Arts students except Frosh. The president of the Frosh Undergraduate Society is an ex officio member of the ASUS ex­ DOUG JUNG, President of the Young Conservatives of Canada, speaking to Chris Maule. ecutive, however. Mr. Jung spoke to students yesterday of his life as a member of Parliament. Brown was criticized Wednes­ — Photo by Neil Burton day for not calling the meeting on a day when there were no scheduled events. (Students had a choice Wed­ nesday of hearing Douglas Jung, Douglas Jung ''Canadian, NotLeslie Peterson , or a Beethoven concert.) Brown blamed the poor turn­ out on the lack of publicity re­ Politician' At Campus Speechceived in the Ubyssey. He explained that the meeting By KERRY WHITE "but as a fellow Canadian." , dealt with his impressions of was originally scheduled for last Douglas Jung came lo UBC He began his talk sponsored Parliament in his capacity as the Friday.
    [Show full text]
  • The Archaeology of 1858 in the Fraser Canyon
    The Archaeology of 1858 in the Fraser Canyon Brian Pegg* Introduction ritish Columbia was created as a political entity because of the events of 1858, when the entry of large numbers of prospectors during the Fraser River gold rush led to a short but vicious war Bwith the Nlaka’pamux inhabitants of the Fraser Canyon. Due to this large influx of outsiders, most of whom were American, the British Parliament acted to establish the mainland colony of British Columbia on 2 August 1858.1 The cultural landscape of the Fraser Canyon underwent extremely significant changes between 1858 and the end of the nineteenth century. Construction of the Cariboo Wagon Road and the Canadian Pacific Railway, the establishment of non-Indigenous communities at Boston Bar and North Bend, and the creation of the reserve system took place in the Fraser Canyon where, prior to 1858, Nlaka’pamux people held largely undisputed military, economic, legal, and political power. Before 1858, the most significant relationship Nlaka’pamux people had with outsiders was with the Hudson’s Bay Company (HBC), which had forts at Kamloops, Langley, Hope, and Yale.2 Figure 1 shows critical locations for the events of 1858 and immediately afterwards. In 1858, most of the miners were American, with many having a military or paramilitary background, and they quickly entered into hostilities with the Nlaka’pamux. The Fraser Canyon War initially conformed to the pattern of many other “Indian Wars” within the expanding United States (including those in California, from whence many of the Fraser Canyon miners hailed), with miners approaching Indigenous inhabitants * The many individuals who have contributed to this work are too numerous to list.
    [Show full text]
  • Before Pearl Harbor 29
    Part I Niseiand lssei Before PearlHarbor On Decemb er'7, 194L, Japan attacked and crippled the American fleet at Pearl Harbor. Ten weeks later, on February 19, 1942, President Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9066 under which the War De- partment excluded from the West Coast everyone of Japanese ances- try-both American citizens and their alien parents who, despite long residence in the United States, were barred by federal law from be- coming American citizens. Driven from their homes and farms and "relocation businesses, very few had any choice but to go to centers"- Spartan, barrack-like camps in the inhospitable deserts and mountains of the interior. * *There is a continuing controversy over the contention that the camps "concentration were camps" and that any other term is a euphemism. The "concentration government documents of the time frequently use the term camps," but after World War II, with full realization of the atrocities committed by the Nazis in the death camps of Europe, that phrase came to have a very different meaning. The American relocation centers were bleak and bare, and life in them had many hardships, but they were not extermination camps, nor did the American government embrace a policy of torture or liquidation of the "concentration To use the phrase camps summons up images ethnic Japanese. "relo- ,and ideas which are inaccurate and unfair. The Commission has used "relocation cation centers" and camps," the usual term used during the war, not to gloss over the hardships of the camps, but in an effort to {ind an historically fair and accurate phrase.
    [Show full text]
  • MANAGING DISCORD in the AMERICAS Great Britain and the United States 1886-1896
    MANAGING DISCORD IN THE AMERICAS Great Britain and the United States 1886-1896 GERER LA DISCORDE DANS LES AMERIQUES La Grande-Bretagne et les Etats-Unis 1886-1896 A Thesis Submitted To the Division of Graduate Studies of the Royal Military College of Canada By Charles Robertson Maier, CD, MA In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy April 2010 ©This Thesis may be used within the Department of National Defence but copyright for open publication remains the property of the author Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 OttawaONK1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-69195-3 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-69195-3 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief for the National Asian Pacific American Bar Association and Others As Amici Curiae Supporting Respondents
    NO. 17-965 In the Supreme Court of the United States DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, et al., Petitioners, v. HAWAII, et al., Respondents. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit BRIEF FOR THE NATIONAL ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION AND OTHERS AS AMICI CURIAE SUPPORTING RESPONDENTS Tina R. Matsuoka James W. Kim Navdeep Singh Counsel of Record Meredith S.H. Higashi Cathy Zeman Scheineson Rachana Pathak Llewelyn M. Engel Albert Giang McDermott Will & Emery LLP National Asian Pacific 500 North Capitol Street, Northwest American Bar Association Washington, D.C. 20001 1612 K Street, Northwest 202.756.8195 Suite 510 202.591.2757 fax Washington, D.C. 20006 [email protected] 202.775.9555 202.775.9333 fax Counsel for Amici Curiae Becker Gallagher · Cincinnati, OH · Washington, D.C. · 800.890.5001 i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES.................. iii INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE ............. 1 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT ............. 2 ARGUMENT............................... 2 I. Executive Order History.................... 2 II. The United States Has Renounced Nationality- Based Discrimination in Immigration Due to Past Abuse and Injustice that Should Inform Any Assessment of the Proclamation..........5 A. The Proclamation Echoes Historical Discrimination in the Application of Immigration Laws Based upon National Origin................................ 6 B. In 1965, Congress and President Johnson Dismantled Quotas Based upon Nationality and Barred Distinctions Based upon “Race, Sex, Nationality, Place of Birth, or Place of Residence.” .......................... 13 C. By Promoting Discrimination, the Executive Orders are Contrary to the Statutory Language and Purpose. ................ 18 D. The History of Discrimination Informs the Present Dispute......................
    [Show full text]
  • CHRP Report 110222
    A Historical Brief of Chinese Canadians in Ottawa Ontario Canada 加 京 早 期 華 人 史 略 Sponsored by Community Historical Recognition Program, 2008-09 Citizenship and Multiculturalism Branch, Citizenship and Immigration Canada 加拿大東安省台山同鄉會 EASTERN ONTARIO HOY SUN ASSOCIATION CANADA Table of Contents Historical Background ...........................3 Ottawa's Chinatown ............................13 Chinese Associations ...........................24 Chinese Laundry Shops and Cafes. 30 Christian Church and the Chinese Community . 35 Acknowledgements.............................37 References.....................................38 2 Historical Background The first Chinese arrived in today's British better livelihood overseas, giving rise to the Columbia in 1788, when Macau-based infamous coolie trade in 1845. Thousands China trader Captain John Meares recruited upon thousands of Chinese were bundled 50 artisans from south China's Guangdong out to toil drudgingly in European-owned province to Nootka Sound on Vancouver plantations in Southeast Asia, Australia and Island to help develop a sea otter pelt trade New Zealand, Hawaii, the Caribbean and between Guangzhou ( the capital city of Central America. The coolie trade was Guangdong, also known as Canton ) and the officially outlawed in 1859 and replaced by a British colony of Victoria. Guangzhou was contract system. then the only port-city decreed since 1757 by the Manchu government (founded in When gold was discovered in California 1644) to deal with foreign merchants. in the late 1840s, 25,000 Chinese men from Guangdong's Pearl River delta scrambled In the 18th century, many countries in across the Pacific Ocean between 1848 and Europe recorded increasing trade deficits 1852 to search for gold on the U.S. West with China because of the rapid growth of coast.
    [Show full text]
  • The Global Irish and Chinese: Migration, Exclusion, and Foreign Relations Among Empires, 1784-1904
    THE GLOBAL IRISH AND CHINESE: MIGRATION, EXCLUSION, AND FOREIGN RELATIONS AMONG EMPIRES, 1784-1904 A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History By Barry Patrick McCarron, M.A. Washington, DC April 6, 2016 Copyright 2016 by Barry Patrick McCarron All Rights Reserved ii THE GLOBAL IRISH AND CHINESE: MIGRATION, EXCLUSION, AND FOREIGN RELATIONS AMONG EMPIRES, 1784-1904 Barry Patrick McCarron, M.A. Thesis Advisor: Carol A. Benedict, Ph.D. ABSTRACT This dissertation is the first study to examine the Irish and Chinese interethnic and interracial dynamic in the United States and the British Empire in Australia and Canada during the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Utilizing comparative and transnational perspectives and drawing on multinational and multilingual archival research including Chinese language sources, “The Global Irish and Chinese” argues that Irish immigrants were at the forefront of anti-Chinese movements in Australia, Canada, and the United States during the second half of the nineteenth century. Their rhetoric and actions gave rise to Chinese immigration restriction legislation and caused major friction in the Qing Empire’s foreign relations with the United States and the British Empire. Moreover, Irish immigrants east and west of the Rocky Mountains and on both sides of the Canada-United States border were central to the formation of a transnational white working-class alliance aimed at restricting the flow of Chinese labor into North America. Looking at the intersections of race, class, ethnicity, and gender, this project reveals a complicated history of relations between the Irish and Chinese in Australia, Canada, and the United States, which began in earnest with the mid-nineteenth century gold rushes in California, New South Wales, Victoria, and British Columbia.
    [Show full text]
  • Racial Identity and Rights Activism in Vancouver, 1919
    “OUTOFMANYKINDREDSANDTONGUES”: RACIALIDENTITYANDRIGHTSACTIVISMINVANCOUVER,1919Ͳ1939 by LiLynnWan Submittedinpartialfulfilmentoftherequirements forthedegreeofDoctorofPhilosophy at DalhousieUniversity Halifax,NovaScotia April2011 ©CopyrightbyLiLynnWan,2011 DALHOUSIEUNIVERSITY DEPARTMENTOFHISTORY TheundersignedherebycertifythattheyhavereadandrecommendtotheFacultyof GraduateStudiesforacceptanceathesisentitled““OUTOFMANYKINDREDSAND TONGUES”:RACIALIDENTITYANDRIGHTSACTIVISMINVANCOUVER,1919Ͳ1939”by LiLynnWaninpartialfulfillmentoftherequirementsforthedegreeofDoctorof Philosophy. Dated: April14,2011 ExternalExaminer: _________________________________ ResearchSupervisor: _________________________________ ExaminingCommittee: _________________________________ _________________________________ DepartmentalRepresentative:_________________________________ ii DALHOUSIEUNIVERSITY DATE: April14,2011 AUTHOR: LiLynnWan TITLE: “OUTOFMANYKINDREDSANDTONGUES”:RACIALIDENTITYANDRIGHTS ACTIVISMINVANCOUVER,1919Ͳ1939 DEPARTMENTORSCHOOL: DepartmentofHistory DEGREE: PhD CONVOCATION: October YEAR: 2011 PermissionisherewithgrantedtoDalhousieUniversitytocirculateandtohavecopied for nonͲcommercial purposes, at its discretion, the above title upon the request of individualsorinstitutions.Iunderstandthatmythesiswillbeelectronicallyavailableto thepublic. The author reserves other publication rights, and neither the thesis nor extensive extractsfromitmaybeprintedorotherwisereproducedwithouttheauthor’swritten permission. The authorattests
    [Show full text]