Water Resources in Europe and Central Asia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Water Resources in Europe and Central Asia WATER RESOURCES IN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA VOLUME II COUNTRY WATER NOTES AND SELECTED TRANSBOUNDARY BASINS 2003 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20433, USA Manufactured in the United States of America Second Printing August 2003 This publication is in two volumes: (a) Volume I—Water Resources in Europe and Central Asia: Issues and Strategic Directions; and (b) the present Volume II—Water Resources in Europe and Central Asia: Country Water Notes and Selected Transboundary Basins. The Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development (ECSSD) Department is distributing this report to disseminate findings of work-in-progress and to encourage debate, feedback and exchange of ideas on important issues in the Europe and Central Asia region. The report carries the names of the authors and should be used and cited accordingly. The findings, interpretations and conclusions are the authors’ own and should not be attributed to the World Bank, its Board of Directors, its management, or any member countries. For submission of comments and suggestions, and additional information, including copies of this report, please contact Ms. Rita Cestti at: 1818 H Street N.W. Washington, DC 20433, USA Email: [email protected] Tel: (1-202) 473-3473 Fax: (1-202) 614-0698 Printed on Recycled Paper TABLE OF CONTENTS Weights and Measures...................................................................................................................ii Acronyms and Abbreviations ......................................................................................................iii Geographic Glossary .....................................................................................................................v Overview........................................................................................................................................vi PART 1: COUNTRY WATER NOTES Albania..........................................................................................................................................1 Armenia.......................................................................................................................................11 Azerbaijan...................................................................................................................................17 Belarus ........................................................................................................................................25 Bosnia and Herzegovina .............................................................................................................32 ` Bulgaria .......................................................................................................................................42 Croatia .........................................................................................................................................52 Czech Republic ...........................................................................................................................64 Estonia.........................................................................................................................................67 Georgia........................................................................................................................................70 Hungary.......................................................................................................................................77 Kazakhstan..................................................................................................................................81 Kyrgyz Republic .........................................................................................................................87 Latvia ..........................................................................................................................................95 Lithuania .....................................................................................................................................99 Former Yugoslavia Republic of Macedonia .............................................................................103 Moldova ....................................................................................................................................113 Poland........................................................................................................................................121 Romania ....................................................................................................................................124 Russian Federation....................................................................................................................133 Serbia and Montenegro .............................................................................................................143 Slovak Republic ........................................................................................................................164 Slovenia.....................................................................................................................................167 Tajikistan...................................................................................................................................171 Turkey.......................................................................................................................................178 Turkmenistan............................................................................................................................186 Ukraine......................................................................................................................................191 Uzbekistan.................................................................................................................................200 PART 2: SELECTED TRANSBOUNDARY BASINS AND REGIONAL SEAS Aral Sea.....................................................................................................................................207 Baltic Sea ..................................................................................................................................209 Black Sea/Danube Basins .........................................................................................................211 Caspian Sea...............................................................................................................................214 WEIGHTS AND MEASURES BCM billion cubic meters cm centimeter GW gigawatt GWh gigawatt-hour GWh/year gigawatt-hour per year ha hectare km kilometer km2 square kilometer kW kilowatts l/sec Liters per second lcd Liters per capita per day m meter m3 cubic meter m3/sec cubic meter per second masl meters above sea level MCM million cubic meters mg/l milligrams per liter mm millimeter MW megawatt ii ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS BVO River Basin Organization BOD Biochemical Oxygen Demand CAS Country Assistance Strategy COD Chemical Oxygen Demand DSI State Hydraulic Works EBRD European Bank for Reconstruction and Development ECA Europe and Central Asia ECE Economic Commission for Europe EIB European Investment Bank ESR Environmental Sector Report EU European Union FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations FBiH Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina FY Fiscal Year FYR Former Yugoslav Republic GDP Gross Domestic Product GEF Global Environment Facility GTZ Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (German Technical Assistance Agency) HEI Hygiene Epidemiological Institute HELCOM Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission HMI Hydro Meteorological Institute HPP Hydro Power Plant HPS Hydro Power Station HRMEPP Hazards Risk Mitigation and Emergency Preparedness Project IBRD International Bank for Reconstruction and Development IBSFC International Baltic Sea Fishery Commission I&D Irrigation and Drainage ICPDR International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River ICWC Interstate Commission for Water Coordination IDA International Development Association IDP Internally Displaced Person ICSD Interstate Commission on Sustainable Development ICWC Interstate Commission for Water Coordination IFAS International Fund for the Aral Sea IFI International Financial Institution INWEB International Network of Water-Environment Centers for the Balkans JSC Joint Stock Company KfW Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau (German Project Funding Agency) LOCP Lake Ohrid Conservation Project MDG Millennium Development Goal MESP Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning iii MAWRPI Ministry of Agriculture and Water Resources and Processing Industry MESP Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning METAP Mediterranean Environmental Technical Assistance Program MNREP Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Protection MoAWF Ministry of Agriculture, Water Management and Forestry MoEP Ministry of Environmental Protection MoWEP Ministry of Water and Environmental Protection NEAP National Environmental Action Plan NGO Non Governmental Organization NWC National Water Council O&M Operation and Maintenance PHARE Poland, Hungary Aid for Reconstruction of the Economy (European Commission) RBA River Basin Agency REC Regional Environment Centre REReP Regional Environment Reconstruction Programme RS Republika Srpska (Bosnian Serb Republic) SAPARD Special Accession Program for Agriculture and Rural Development SEE South Eastern Europe SCWE State Committee of Water
Recommended publications
  • The Kenya Wildlife Service at Its Best
    ihe Kenya wild Life service Iru the 2±st century: "Protective cqlobally significant Areas and Resoutrces The George Wright Forum The GWS Journal of Parks, Protected Areas & Cultural Sites volume 29 number 1 • 2012 Origins Founded in 1980, the George Wright Society is organized for the pur­ poses of promoting the application of knowledge, fostering communica­ tion, improving resource management, and providing information to improve public understanding and appreciation of the basic purposes of natural and cultural parks and equivalent reserves. The Society is dedicat­ ed to the protection, preservation, and management of cultural and natu­ ral parks and reserves through research and education. Mission The George Wright Society advances the scientific and heritage values of parks and protected areas. The Society promotes professional research and resource stewardship across natural and cultural disciplines, provides avenues of communication, and encourages public policies that embrace these values. Our Goal The Society strives to be the premier organization connecting people, places, knowledge, and ideas to foster excellence in natural and cultural resource management, research, protection, and interpretation in parks and equivalent reserves. Board of Directors BRENT A. MITCHELL, PRESIDENT • Ipswich, Massachusetts MOLLY N. ROSS, VICE PRESIDENT • Arlington, Virginia DAVIDJ. PARSONS, SECRETARY • Florence, Montana GARY E. DAVIS, TREASURER • Thousand Oaks, California BRAD BARR • Woods Hole, Massachusetts NATHALIE GAGNON • Ottawa, Ontario BARRETT KENNEDY • Baton Rouge, Louisiana FRANKJ. PRIZNAR • Gaithersburg, Maryland JANW. VAN WAGTEN'DONK • El Portal, California JOHN WAITHAKA • Ottawa, Ontario LYNN WILSON • Cobble Hill, British Columbia GRADUATE STUDENT LIAISON TO THE BOARD CARENA J. VAN RIPER • College Station, Texas Executive Office DAVID HARMON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR EMILY DEKKER-FIALA, CONFERENCE COORDINATOR P.
    [Show full text]
  • From Urban Geodiversity to Geoheritage: the Case of Ljubljana (Slovenia)
    Jure Tičar eT al. QUAESTIONES GEOGRAPHICAE 36(3) • 2017 FROM URBAN GEODIVERSITY TO GEOHERITAGE: THE CASE OF LJUBLJANA (SLOVENIA) Jure Tičar, Blaž Komac, maTiJa Zorn, maTeJa FerK, mauro HrvaTin, roK ciglič Anton Melik Geographical Institute, Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Ljubljana, Slovenia Manuscript received: March 31, 2017 Revised version: June 19, 2017 Tičar J., Komac B., Zorn M., FerK M., HrvaTin M., ciglič R., 2017. From urban geodiversity to geoheritage: the case of Ljubljana (Slovenia). Quaestiones Geographicae 36(3), Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań, pp. 37–50. 7 figs, 1 table. aBsTracT: The city of Ljubljana lies at the intersection of various geomorphological regions that have strongly influ- enced its spatial organization. Prehistoric settlements were built on marshland, a Roman town was built on the first river terrace of the Ljubljanica River, and in the Middle Ages a town was built in a strategic position between the Lju- bljanica River and Castle Hill. The modern city absorbed all usable space between the nearby hills. This paper reviews some relief features in Ljubljana, their influence on the city’s spatial development, and urban geoheritage. The results indicate new possibilities for urban geoheritage tourism in the Slovenian capital and its surroundings. Key words: geoheritage, geomorphology, urbanization, spatial growth, Ljubljana Corresponding author: Jure Tičar, [email protected] Introduction connecting the diversity of geomorphological and geological elements with their interpretation During the 1990s, geologists and geomorphol- and recreation (Necheş 2016). Consenquently ogists started using the term geodiversity to de- many geoparks dedicated to protect and to pro- scribe the diversity of nonliving nature (Sharples mote the nonliving elements of nature are being 1993, Wiedenbein 1994, Zwolinski 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • FEEFHS Journal Volume VII No. 1-2 1999
    FEEFHS Quarterly A Journal of Central & Bast European Genealogical Studies FEEFHS Quarterly Volume 7, nos. 1-2 FEEFHS Quarterly Who, What and Why is FEEFHS? Tue Federation of East European Family History Societies Editor: Thomas K. Ecllund. [email protected] (FEEFHS) was founded in June 1992 by a small dedicated group Managing Editor: Joseph B. Everett. [email protected] of American and Canadian genealogists with diverse ethnic, reli- Contributing Editors: Shon Edwards gious, and national backgrounds. By the end of that year, eleven Daniel Schlyter societies bad accepted its concept as founding members. Each year Emily Schulz since then FEEFHS has doubled in size. FEEFHS nows represents nearly two hundred organizations as members from twenty-four FEEFHS Executive Council: states, five Canadian provinces, and fourteen countries. lt contin- 1998-1999 FEEFHS officers: ues to grow. President: John D. Movius, c/o FEEFHS (address listed below). About half of these are genealogy societies, others are multi-pur- [email protected] pose societies, surname associations, book or periodical publish- 1st Vice-president: Duncan Gardiner, C.G., 12961 Lake Ave., ers, archives, libraries, family history centers, on-line services, in- Lakewood, OH 44107-1533. [email protected] stitutions, e-mail genealogy list-servers, heraldry societies, and 2nd Vice-president: Laura Hanowski, c/o Saskatchewan Genealogi- other ethnic, religious, and national groups. FEEFHS includes or- cal Society, P.0. Box 1894, Regina, SK, Canada S4P 3EI ganizations representing all East or Central European groups that [email protected] have existing genealogy societies in North America and a growing 3rd Vice-president: Blanche Krbechek, 2041 Orkla Drive, group of worldwide organizations and individual members, from Minneapolis, MN 55427-3429.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (719Kb)
    International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention ISSN (Online): 2319 – 7722, ISSN (Print): 2319 – 7714 www.ijhssi.org ||Volume 5 Issue 12||December. 2016 || PP.24-31 Historical–Geographic Overview Life Cycle of Tourism and Hospitality in Dojran and Dojran Lake in Republic of Macedonia Nikola V.Dimitrov (PHD)1, Cane Koteski (PHD)2, Tanja Angelkova Petkova (PHD)3, DejanMetodijeski (PHD)4, Dusko Josevski5 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 (Faculty of tourism and business Logistics – Gevgelija;, University “GoceDelcev” – Stip, R.Macedonia) Abstract: Dojran and Dojran Lake is a specific tourist area located in the southeast region in the Republic of Macedonia.The aim of this paper is to identify the beginning and explain the historical and geographical order of appearance, changes and processes in tourism and hospitality, and parallel to it determines the relationship of the life cycle of tourism in Dojran region. In this space tourism is based on the values of the natural triad, air– water-land,so most tourists use their time for various recreational,sports,health and other activities in and around the lake water. To confirm hypothesis we are using multiple research methods.Research starts with a descriptive method,continue with the evolutive and ends up with empirical method. In addition we use statistical, cartographic and other methods. According to the data from our research the lake and the settlement develop cyclically together with tourism.From the research we established a cycle which in the period of its maximum development is interrupted,and which soon begins to stabilize and rejuvenates with real indicatiors of tourism growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Genetic Resources Information Bulletin
    27 SAVING THE TUROPOLJE PIG IN CROATLA, H.-P. Grunenfelder’, G. Gugic’ and F. Punz3 ‘Pro Specie Rara, Schneebergstr. 17, CH-9000 St.Gallen, SWITZERLAND ‘Projectleader SAVE/Euronatur, Suvoj 40, HR-44213 Kratecko, CROATIA 3SAVE-coordination, Tullnerstr. 18, A-3423 St.Andra-Wérdern, AUSTRIA SUMMARY On the front lines of Croatia’s war areas live the Turopolje pigs, in danger of extinction. Immediate action is sorely needed. The new European Foundation SAVE (Safeguard for Agricultural Varieties in Europe), an umbrella organization for the in-situ conservation of agricultural genetic resources, has started an international rescue project. The remaining pigs are listed and will be regrouped for a mating program, which avoids inbreeding. For an additional insurance, SAVE will also bring new breeding groups away from the front lines in, and outside of, Croatia. A breeding register has been set up provisionally at the herdbook office for endangered breeds with Pro Specie Rara in St.Gallen, Switzerland. Key words: Genetic Resource s, Pig, Croatia RESUME En Croatie, entre les frontiéres de guerre, la race porcine du, Touropoije a tenement diminuée, qu’elle est menacée d’extinction. Une action immédiate est nécessaire. La nouvelle fondation européenne SAVE (Safegard pour I’Agriculture des Variétés d’Europe), une organisation faitière pour la conservation in-situ, a commencé un projet pilote international. Les porcins existants sont registrés et seront regroupés pour un programme d’accouplement, qui évite la consanguinity. Pour la sécurité additionnelle SAVE est en train de créer des nouveaux groupes d’é1evage loin des zones de guerre, en arriére-Croatie et mème A 1'étranger.
    [Show full text]
  • The Second Assessment of Transboundary Rivers, Lakes and Groundwaters: South-Eastern Europe
    The Second Assessment of Transboundary Rivers, Lakes and Groundwaters: South-Eastern Europe Annukka Lipponen Environmental Affairs Officer, UNECE Coordinator of the Second Assessment Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes Background • SEE assessment was presented to the MoP-5 (2009) which endorsed it • Revisions presented to WGMA-11 in July 2010 (document ECE/MP.WAT/WG.2/2010/3, see Water Convention web site); now incorporated • Additional revisions came in after WGMA- 11 Substantial changes: Black Sea • RS added information to the reservoirs Iron Gates I and II • Rezvaya (Rezovska) River Basin added, information from BG, TR • Landuse/land cover, pressures (sand and gravel abstraction from Struma/Strymonas river, flow reduction on Mesta/Nestos), transboundary cooperation (1995 agreement with Greece), measures taken – BG • Evros/Meriç aquifer • Drava & Mura: information on the HU part added, basin areas revised Substantial changes: Mediterranean • Characteristics of the shared water bodies – Lake Prespa, L. Ohrid, Drin, L. Skadar/Shkoder, Buna/Bojana, changes to selected figures - Society for the Protection of Prespa • Bileća Reservoir/ Bilećko Lake assessment added based on information from BA • Topolovgrad Massif & Vidlic/Nishava aquifer complemented, BG Some bilateral agreements added – Croatia-Hungary on the Danube, Dráva and Mura (1995) – Greece and Υugoslavia concerning Axios/Vardar, Doiran Lake, Prespa Lake (1959) – Albania-FYROM-Greece on the Prespa Lake (2010) – Romania-Hungary
    [Show full text]
  • Rare and Missing Breeds of the Balkan”
    SAVE Workshop “Rare and Missing Breeds of the Balkan” "Indigenous breeds of the crossborder area of West Stara Planina Mountain" Dr vet. med. Sergej Ivanov, Site Coordinator of the Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe, Country Office Serbia and Montenegro, Project “Promotion of Networks and Exchanges in the Countries of South Eastern Europe” Wets Stara Planina Mountain Site; President of the Management Board of “Natura Balkanika” Nature Society In 2001, REC initiated the project “Promotion of Networks and Exchanges Between the Countries of South Eastern Europe”. It is set in the framework of the Stability Pact for South Eastern Europe and part of the “Regional Environmental Reconstruction Program”. Part of this project is being conducted in the area of West Stara Planina Mountain with objective to support and implement activities leading to effective cross-border management of natural resources, and to empower local stakeholders to improve their well-being through support and promotion of environmentally friendly tourism, agriculture and traditional crafts. In the region of WSP, the government of the Republic of Serbia during 1997 passed the regulation of the protection of the Nature Park “Stara Planina”, which occupies 1422.20 km2. There is a proosal to recognize WSP mountain as an UNESCO MAB reserve. In 1996 the Ministries of Bulgaria and Serbia signed a memorandum for creation of transboundary “Peace Park”. In march 2003, as a result of biodiversity studies on REC project, a proposal for the designation of the Nature Park in Bulgaria was submitted to the Bulgarian Ministry of Environment and Waters and the procedure has started.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Methodology and Protocols for 20 Habitats, 20 Species and 20 Birds
    1 Finnish Environment Institute SYKE, Finland Monitoring methodology and protocols for 20 habitats, 20 species and 20 birds Twinning Project MK 13 IPA EN 02 17 Strengthening the capacities for effective implementation of the acquis in the field of nature protection Report D 3.1. - 1. 7.11.2019 Funded by the European Union The Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning, Department of Nature, Republic of North Macedonia Metsähallitus (Parks and Wildlife Finland), Finland The State Service for Protected Areas (SSPA), Lithuania 2 This project is funded by the European Union This document has been produced with the financial support of the European Union. Its contents are the sole responsibility of the Twinning Project MK 13 IPA EN 02 17 and and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union 3 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Summary 6 Overview 8 Establishment of Natura 2000 network and the process of site selection .............................................................. 9 Preparation of reference lists for the species and habitats ..................................................................................... 9 Needs for data .......................................................................................................................................................... 9 Protocols for the monitoring of birds ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Protection of the Dojran Lake Catchment Area
    RMZ - Materials and Geoenvironment, Vol 50, No 1, pp 369-372, 2003 369 Environmental protection of the Dojran Lake catchment area RISTO STOJANOV1, BRANKA TRÈEK2, TADEJ DOLENEC3, TRAJAN DIMKOVSKI2 & SIMON PIRC3 1Faculty of Mining and Geology, Goce Delèev 89, 2000 tip, Macedonia; E-mail: info@rgf#ukim#edu#mk 2Geological Survey of Slovenia, Dimièeva ul# 14, SI-100 Ljubljana, Slovenia; E-mail: branka#trcek@geo-zs#si, dimkovski@amis#net 3Faculty of Natural Sciences and Technology, Department of Geology, Akerèeva 12, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; E-mail: tadej#dolenec@ntfgeo#uni-lj#si, simon#pirc@guest#arnes#si Abstract: This paper points out the need of solving the ecological problems of the Dojran Lake and its catchment area, which mainly result from the overexploitation of water sources The most important results of hydrogeological and hydrological investigations are presented and the vulnerability of the territory is characterized Key words: Dojran lake, water sources, overexploitation, ecological problems INTRODUCTION The Dojran Lake and its catchment area are very important sources for the public, industrial and, especially, agricultural water supply The Dojran Lake is located in the south-eastern part of Macedonia on the border with Greece (Figure 1) at 148 m of the altitude The water resources of the Dojran Lake catchment area have been overexploited, which resulted in numerous ecological problems The lake fauna and flora has been changed - many species disappeared, but some new ones appeared that had not been typical for that environment
    [Show full text]
  • Capoeta Aydinensis, a New Species of Scraper from Southwestern Anatolia, Turkey (Teleostei: Cyprinidae)
    Turkish Journal of Zoology Turk J Zool (2017) 41: 436-442 http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/zoology/ © TÜBİTAK Research Article doi:10.3906/zoo-1510-43 Capoeta aydinensis, a new species of scraper from southwestern Anatolia, Turkey (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) 1 2 1, 2 1 Davut TURAN , Fahrettin KÜÇÜK , Cüneyt KAYA *, Salim Serkan GÜÇLÜ , Yusuf BEKTAŞ 1 Faculty of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Turkey 2 Faculty of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey Received: 16.10.2015 Accepted/Published Online: 27.10.2016 Final Version: 23.05.2017 Abstract: Capoeta aydinensis sp. nov. is described from the Büyük Menderes River and the streams Tersakan, Dalaman, and Namnam in southwestern Turkey. It is distinguished from all other Anatolian Capoeta species by the following combination of characters: one pair of barbels; a plain brownish body coloration; a well-developed keel in front of the dorsal-fin origin; a slightly arched mouth; a slightly convex lower jaw with a well-developed keratinized edge; a weakly ossified last simple dorsal-fin ray, serrated along about 60%–70% of its length, with 14–20 serrae along its posterior edge; 58–71 total lateral line scales; 11–12 scale rows between lateral line and dorsal-fin origin; 7–9 scale rows between lateral line and anal-fin origin. Key words: Büyük Menderes, Capoeta, new species, Turkey 1. Introduction 2. Materials and methods Anatolian species of the genus Capoeta have been Fish were caught using pulsed DC electrofishing intensively studied in the last decade (Turan et al., 2006a, equipment. The material is deposited in the Recep Tayyip 2006b, 2008; Özuluğ and Freyhof, 2008; Schöter et al., 2009; Erdoğan University Zoology Museum of the Faculty of Küçük et al., 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Ptica Godine U Hrvatskoj 2016. Godine 2016
    BREGUNICA (Riparia riparia) Factsheet Ptica godine u Hrvatskoj 2016. godine 2016 Veličine od oko 12 cm i težine samo 14 grama, bregunica (Riparia riparia) je najmanja europska lastavica. Vrlo je društvena vrsta, koja gnijezdi u kolonijama, obično u prirodnim, okomitim, pjeskovitim obalama nizinskih rijeka. Bregunica je ambasador živih i zdravih rijeka i gnijezdi u staništima poput prirodnih strmih zemljanih i pjeskovitih obala. Na rijeci Dravi još uvijek živi oko 50% hrvatske populacije bregunica, međutim broj parova se u posljednjih 30 godina smanjio za 90%. Naime, bregunica i druge vrste dravskih ptica pod velikim su pritiskom zbog nestanka staništa, u prvom redu zbog izgradnje obaloutvrda i hidroelektrana koje mijenjaju prirodnu dinamiku rijeke i onemogućuju stvaranje prirodno strmih obala. Pored očuvanja postojećih kolonija, potrebno je obnoviti i dosad uništena staništa, a potrebno je i zaustaviti regulacije te korištenje pesticida duž Bregunica je najmanja riječnog koridora rijeke Drave, koji ubijaju kukce, njihov glavni izvor lastavica u Europi. hrane. Stoga je WWF, zajedno s brojnim udrugama, proglasio 2016. Dužina: 12 cm godinom bregunice, kako bi skrenuo pozornost javnosti na potrebu Raspon krila: 26 - 29 cm očuvanja ove iznimne vrste i njenih staništa. Stanište Gnijezdi se u strmim obalama rijeka, rjeđe u iskopima šljunka i pijeska. Kada se bregunice u travnju vraćaju iz Afrike, počinju kopati oko 70 cm duboke rupe u strmim obalama rijeka. U Hrvatskoj su najbrojnije kolonije na rijeci Dravi (najveću koloniju, koja je u Jelkušu, dijelimo s Mađarskom). Gnijezdi još na rijekama Muri, Savi i Dunavu. Rasprostranjenost Bregunica je rasprostranjena na području čitave Europe, sve do krajnjeg sjevera. Rasprostranjena je i na širem području Azije te Sjeverne Amerike.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperation on Turkey's Transboundary Waters
    Cooperation on Turkey's transboundary waters Aysegül Kibaroglu Axel Klaphake Annika Kramer Waltina Scheumann Alexander Carius Status Report commissioned by the German Federal Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety F+E Project No. 903 19 226 Oktober 2005 Imprint Authors: Aysegül Kibaroglu Axel Klaphake Annika Kramer Waltina Scheumann Alexander Carius Project management: Adelphi Research gGmbH Caspar-Theyß-Straße 14a D – 14193 Berlin Phone: +49-30-8900068-0 Fax: +49-30-8900068-10 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.adelphi-research.de Publisher: The German Federal Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety D – 11055 Berlin Phone: +49-01888-305-0 Fax: +49-01888-305 20 44 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.bmu.de © Adelphi Research gGmbH and the German Federal Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, 2005 Cooperation on Turkey's transboundary waters i Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 1.1 Motive and main objectives ........................................................................................1 1.2 Structure of this report................................................................................................3 2 STRATEGIC ROLE OF WATER RESOURCES FOR THE TURKISH ECONOMY..........5 2.1 Climate and water resources......................................................................................5 2.2 Infrastructure development.........................................................................................7
    [Show full text]