Cooperation on Turkey's Transboundary Waters

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cooperation on Turkey's Transboundary Waters Cooperation on Turkey's transboundary waters Aysegül Kibaroglu Axel Klaphake Annika Kramer Waltina Scheumann Alexander Carius Status Report commissioned by the German Federal Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety F+E Project No. 903 19 226 Oktober 2005 Imprint Authors: Aysegül Kibaroglu Axel Klaphake Annika Kramer Waltina Scheumann Alexander Carius Project management: Adelphi Research gGmbH Caspar-Theyß-Straße 14a D – 14193 Berlin Phone: +49-30-8900068-0 Fax: +49-30-8900068-10 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.adelphi-research.de Publisher: The German Federal Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety D – 11055 Berlin Phone: +49-01888-305-0 Fax: +49-01888-305 20 44 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.bmu.de © Adelphi Research gGmbH and the German Federal Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, 2005 Cooperation on Turkey's transboundary waters i Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 1.1 Motive and main objectives ........................................................................................1 1.2 Structure of this report................................................................................................3 2 STRATEGIC ROLE OF WATER RESOURCES FOR THE TURKISH ECONOMY..........5 2.1 Climate and water resources......................................................................................5 2.2 Infrastructure development.........................................................................................7 2.3 Water use per capita and by sectors..........................................................................8 2.4 Strategic role of the Euphrates and Tigris rivers, the key to the Southeastern Anatolia Project..........................................................................................................9 3 TURKEY’S WATER-RELATED ADMINISTRATIVE SET-UP ........................................11 3.1 Water laws and regulations......................................................................................11 3.2 Organisations in the water sector.............................................................................12 3.3 What role can public organisations play in improving trans-boundary cooperation?16 4 TURKEY’S POSITION TOWARDS INTERNATIONAL WATER LAW ...........................19 4.1 General principles of international water law............................................................19 4.2 Negotiations on the UN Water Convention (1997) ...................................................20 4.3 Participation in other regional agreements...............................................................22 5 THE RIVER BASINS.......................................................................................................25 5.1 The Maritsa basin.....................................................................................................26 5.2 The Kura-Araks basin...............................................................................................38 5.3 The Coruh basin.......................................................................................................47 5.4 The Euphrates and Tigris rivers ...............................................................................55 5.5 The Orontes basin....................................................................................................66 5.6 Turkish-Syrian transboundary groundwater resources ............................................73 5.7 Cooperation and outstanding issues: similarities and differences............................76 6 TURKEY: TRADING WATER IN REGIONAL MARKETS..............................................79 6.1 The Peace Pipeline Project......................................................................................79 6.2 The Manavgat Water Supply Project........................................................................80 6.3 National concerns in Turkey over water trade..........................................................82 6.4 International bearing.................................................................................................82 7 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................85 7.1 Controversial issues, hitherto agreements and conflict intensity.............................85 7.2 Recommendations ...................................................................................................90 8 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................95 ANNEX 1 ANALYTICAL BACKGROUND – THE CURRENT DEBATE ON TRANSBOUNDARY WATER ISSUES ................................................................................105 ANNEX 2 TRANSLATIONS OF BILATERAL WATER AGREEMENTS ............................109 ii Cooperation on Turkey's transboundary waters List of firgures, tables, and boxes Figure 1: Turkey's transboundary watercourses...................................................................... 4 Figure 2: Turkey's 26 river basins............................................................................................ 6 Figure 3: Map of the Maritsa river and its main tributaries..................................................... 26 Figure 4: Map of Kura, Araks, and main tributaries ............................................................... 38 Figure 5: Map of the Coruh river and its main tributaries....................................................... 47 Figure 6: Map of Euphrates, Tigris, and main tributaries ....................................................... 55 Figure 7: Map of the Orontes river and its main tributaries.................................................... 66 Figure 8: Location of Turkish-Syrian transboundary groundwater resources ........................ 73 Table 1: Water potential generated in Turkey's transboundary river basins............................ 7 Table 2: Multi-purpose water infrastructure in Turkey (in operation and planned, January 2005)................................................................................................................................. 7 Table 3: Activities of public organisations that impact on transboundary water resources.... 18 Table 4: Cooperational context in the Maritsa basin in brief .................................................. 27 Table 5: Cooperational context in the Kura-Araks basin in brief............................................ 39 Table 6: Cooperational context in the Coruh basin in brief .................................................... 48 Table 7: Cooperational context on the Euphrates river in brief.............................................. 56 Table 8: Cooperational context on the Tigris river in brief ..................................................... 57 Table 9: Cooperational context in the Orontes basin in brief ................................................. 67 Box 1: The Southeastern Anatolia Project (GAP) in brief ...................................................... 10 Box 2: Bilateral accords concerning the Euphrates river ....................................................... 61 Cooperation on Turkey's transboundary waters iii List of abbreviations Aarhus Convention UNECE Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (1998) AMSL Above mean sea level Barcelona Convention Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment and the Coastal Region of the Mediterranean (adopted 1976, amended and renamed in 1995) BCM Billion cubic meters BfN German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (Bundesamt für Naturschutz) BOT Build-Operate-Transfer Contracts BSEP Black Sea Environmental Programme Bucharest Convention Convention on the Protection of the Black Sea against Pollution (1992) CBD Convention on Biological Diversity (1992) DSI State Hydraulic Works (Devlet Su Isleri) ECA Export credit agencies EIA Environmental impact assessment EIEI Electrical Investigation Administration (Elektrik Isleri Etüt Idaresi) ESCWA Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia Espoo Convention Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context (1991) GAP Southeastern Anatolia Project (Güneydogu Anadolu Projesi) GAP RDA GAP Regional Development Administration GD DSI General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works (Devlet Su Isleri) GDRS General Directorate for Rural Services (Köy Hizmetleri) GEF Global Environmental Facility GIS Geographical information system GOLD General Organisation for Land Development, Ministry of Irrigation, Syria GTZ German Agency for Technical Cooperation (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit GmbH) HEPP Hydroelectric Power Plant IHP International Hydrological Programme of UNESCO ILA International Law Association INWEB International Network of Water Environment Centres for the Balkans ISARM Internationally Shared (Transboundary) Aquifer Resources Management Programme Istanbul Commission Commission for the Protection of the Black Sea Against Pollution IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources/ World Conservation Union JTC Joint Technical Committee KfW German Bank for Reconstruction and Development (Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau) iv Cooperation on Turkey's transboundary waters MAP Mediterranean Action Plan MCM Million cubic meters MEDASSET Mediterranean Association
Recommended publications
  • Economic Commission for Europe Meeting of the Parties to the Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes
    WG.1/2015/INF.4 Economic Commission for Europe Meeting of the Parties to the Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes Working Group on Integrated Water Resources Management Tenth meeting Geneva, 24 and 25 June 2015 Item 8 of the provisional agenda Thematic assessment of the water-food-energy-ecosystems nexus Draft assessment of the water-food-energy-ecosystems nexus in the Alazani/Ganykh River Basin Prepared by the secretariat with input from experts Summary At its sixth session (Rome, 28–30 November 2012), the Meeting of the Parties to the Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes requested the Task Force on the Water-Food-Energy-Ecosystems Nexus, in cooperation with the Working Group on Integrated Water Resources Management, to prepare a thematic assessment focusing on the water-food-energy-ecosystems nexus with a view to its publication prior to the seventh session of the Meeting of the Parties (see ECE/MP.WAT/37, para. 38 (i)). The present document contains the draft nexus assessment of the Alazani/Ganykh River Basin. The draft assessment is the result of an assessment process carried out according to the methodology described in document ECE/MP.WAT/WG.1/2015/8 developed on the basis of a desk study of relevant documentation, an assessment workshop (Kachreti, Georgia; 25-27 November 2013), as well as inputs from local experts and officials of the riparian countries. The draft assessment of the Alazani/Ganykh was circulated for review and comments to the authorities of the riparian countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Deriner Dam, Artvin, Turkey
    SHARING SUCCESS Deriner Dam, Artvin, Turkey Deriner Dam, located in Artvin, North Eastern Turkey, is 249 metres high and features a double-curvature concrete arch. It is the tallest dam of any kind in Turkey and ranks in the top 10 of the highest concrete dams in the world. Its purpose: hydropower. BACKGROUND the world at the time and, in terms of volume, SUCCESS FACTORS About one-fifth of the world’s electricity is pro- remains the largest embankment dam in Pöyry’s work at Deriner Dam required a duced in hydropower stations. It’s an efficient Turkey today. high-level of partnership: with DSI and and sustainable way of generating power. The a number of other firms that formed the General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works CLIENT CHALLENGE contractor’s consortium. (DSI) in Turkey has a mission1: “to develop all The full scope of the project included con- A clear governance model was water and land resources in Turkey…wisely struction of a double curvature arch dam, established that enabled seamless col- using natural resources.” In 1969, a survey diversion tunnel, underground powerhouse, laboration and project of the energy potential of the Coruh River two completely separate spillway concepts transparency between the client, Pöyry was carried out, and the construction of the and infrastructure including access roads. and our consortium partner, Dolsar Engi- Deriner Project commenced almost three Construction began in 1998 and held a neering Inc Co. decades later. number of daunting challenges: the site was situated in a remote, mountainous region. “Because Deriner presented so many In 1987, DSI awarded Pöyry as a key partner challenges, it was important for us to for the project based on their ability to handle The spillway structures had to safely manage partner with a company that brought new the complexities and scale involved with the large design floods.
    [Show full text]
  • Fieldwork on Threatened Vipers In
    WWW.IRCF.ORG/REPTILESANDAMPHIBIANSJOURNALTABLE OF CONTENTS IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANSIRCF REPTILES • VOL15, NO & 4 AMPHIBIANS• DEC 2008 189 • 23(1):1–9 • APR 2016 IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS CONSERVATION AND NATURAL HISTORY TABLE OF CONTENTS FEATURE ARTICLES The. Chasing Valley Bullsnakes (Pituophis catenifer of sayi ) inFour Wisconsin: Viper Species and a On the Road to Understanding the Ecology and Conservation of the Midwest’s Giant Serpent ...................... Joshua M. Kapfer 190 . The Shared History of Treeboas (Corallus grenadensis) and Humans on Grenada: HighlandA Hypothetical Excursion ............................................................................................................................ of Dwarfs: FieldworkRobert W. Henderson on 198 ThreatenedRESEARCH ARTICLES Vipers in Northeastern Turkey . The Texas Horned Lizard in Central and Western Texas ....................... Emily Henry, Jason Brewer, Krista Mougey, and Gad Perry 204 . The Knight Anole (Anolis1 equestris) in Florida 2 2 ˙ 3 1 Konrad ............................................. Mebert , BayramBrian J. Camposano,Göçmen Kenneth, Mert L. Krysko, Karıs¸ Kevin, Nas¸it M. Enge, I g˘Ellenci ,M. and Donlan, Sylvain and Michael Ursenbacher Granatosky 212 1Department of Environmental Sciences, Section of Conservation Biology, University of Basel, CONSERVATION ALERT St. Johanns-Vorstadt 10, 4056 Basel, Switzerland ([email protected]) . 2World’sDepartment Mammals of Biology,in Crisis ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Türkiye Cumhuriyeti'nin İlk Genel Nüfus Sayımında Ardahan Vilâyeti
    Türkiye Cumhuriyeti’nin İlk Genel Nüfus Sayımında Ardahan Vilâyeti’nin Nüfus Özellikleri The Population Characteristics of Ardahan Province in the First General Census of the Turkish Republic Oğuz ŞİMŞEK* Özet Bu çalışmada, Ardahan ilinin, Cumhuriyeti’nin ilk genel nüfus sayımı olan 1927 Genel Nüfus Sayımı’ndaki nüfus özellikleri ele alınmıştır. Çalışmanın giriş bölü- münde 1927 Genel Nüfus Sayımı’ndan önceki dönemlerde Ardahan Vilâyeti’nin nüfusu ve nüfus özellikleri kısaca değinilmiştir. Çalışmanın asıl bölümünde ise, 28 Ekim 1927’de yapılan ilk genel nüfus sayımı sonuçlarına dayanılarak, Ardahan Vilâ- yeti’nin genel nüfusu ve cinsiyet itibariyle nüfusu incelenmiştir. Sonraki bölümlerde ise sırasıyla; yaş grupları itibariyle, medenî hale göre, okur-yazarlık durumuna göre, doğum yerleri bakımından, ekonomik faaliyet kolları itibariyle, anadile göre, sakatlık- lar temel alınarak, Ardahan Vilâyeti’nin nüfus yapısı hakkında bilgiler verilmiştir. Bu çalışma ile Ardahan ilinin Rus işgalinde kaldığı dönem ile Cumhuriyetin ilanından sonra yapılan ilk nüfus sayımı arasındaki nüfus özellikleri ve demografik yapısı ortaya konulmaya çalışılmıştır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Doğu Anadolu, Nüfus, Ardahan, Çıldır * Yrd. Doç. Dr., Ardahan Üniversitesi İnsani Bilimler ve Edebiyat Fakültesi Coğrafya Bölümü 75000 Ardahan, e-posta: [email protected] | BELGÜ | 201 Türkiye Cumhuriyeti’nin İlk Genel Nüfus Sayımında Ardahan Vilâyeti’nin Nüfus Özellikleri Abstract In this study, the Ardahan province, the first census of the Republic in the 1927 Ge- neral Population Census population characteristics is discussed. In the introduction to the study of the 1927 Population Census are given information about the popu- lation of the former Ardahan provinces. In the main part of the study, carried out in October 28, 1927 based on the first general census, as Ardahan Province in the ge- neral population and gender are given information about the population.
    [Show full text]
  • Biometry of the Fishes Barbus Plebejus and Barbus Capito from Coruh Basin, Turkey
    Biometry of the fishes Barbus plebejus and Barbus capito from Coruh Basin, Turkey Kemal Solak1, Ali Alas2*, Muhittin Yılmaz3 & Ahmet Öktener4 1. Department of Biology, Faculty of Education, Gazi University, Ankara,Turkey. 2.* Department of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Education, Aksaray University, 68100, Aksaray-Turkey; [email protected] 3. Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Art, Kafkas University, 36100, Kars, Turkey. 4. Istanbul Provencial Directorate of Agriculture, Directorate of Control, Kumkapı Fish Auction Hall, Aquaculture Office, Kumkapı, TR-34130 Istanbul, Turkey. Received 08-V-2008. Corrected 9-VIII-2008. Accepted 11-IX-2008. Abstract: Metric and meristic characters are important to identify fish species and their habitat peculiarities. There are many species that belong to the fish genus Barbus, which is found in tropical and extratropical regions, but there are few studies covering the Coruh basin. Two subspecies of Barbus were found in the Coruh River sys- tem of Eastern Anatolia, Turkey: Barbus plebejus escherichi and Barbus capito capito. We collected specimens in seven localities for measurement. The number of vertebra were determined radiographically. Some specimens of B. capito capito have a sharper snout in the segments of Coruh where the water flows faster, suggesting a modification related to current. The biometric measurements vary geographically and could be related to abiotic and biotic factors in the habitat. Rev. Biol. Trop. 57 (1-2): 159-165. Epub 2009 June 30. Key words: Barbus, metric and meristic characters, Coruh Basin, Turkey. Metric and meristic characters are impor- Turkey. These are Barbus plebejus escherichi tant to identify fish species and their habi- Steındachner, 1897 and Barbus capito capito tat peculiarities as well as ecological criteria Guldenstadt, 1773.
    [Show full text]
  • SYRIA External Dashboard
    4.1 million people assisted in April OTHER RELIEF ACTIVITIES Protracted Relief & through General Food Distributions April 2017 Recovery Operation 200988 9 CBT nutrition support for d 5 million in need of Food Assisted 4.1 11,730 4 4.0m 4.0m* Pregnant and Nursing & Livelihood Support Humanitarian Women 4.0m Access oar 3 3.5m 3.8** Specialised nutrition FUNDING May 2017 May b products for May - October 2017 4.53 2 129,000* million in need in hard- children, pregnant and US$257m* ational Planned nursing women r to-reach and besieged 1 Net Funding Requirements ash areas CHALLENGES Ope Fortied School OPERATIONAL Emergency Operation 200339 Emergency BENEFICIARIES 0 Snacks for over Insecurity Funding D Feb-17 Mar-17 Apr-17 260,500** children 6.3 y * This includes nutrition products for the *The 4.0 million figure includes a buffer of food assistance for 120,660 people, * Including confirmed pledges and solid forecasts million IDPs c prevention and treatment of malnutrition. COMMON SERVICES which can be used for convoys, new displacements and influx of returnees. Source: WFP 10 May 2017 **Voucher Based Assistance reached 1,086 **Based on dispatches Out of School Children. en g Cizre 4,910 T U R K E Y Kiziltepe-Ad Nusaybin-Qamishly g! 4,257 Sanliurfa 3,888 ! Darbasiyah !( CARGO !( g! !Gaziantep !( Adana g!!( !( !( g! Peshkabour TRANSPORTED ! " R d Al Y!(aroubiya 3 E FEB-17 MAR-17 APR-17 (m ) mer Ayn al Arab !( - Rabiaa Islahiye Bab As Salama-Kilis g! !( !( Qamishly d"! g! !(g! g! Ceylanpinar-Ras Al Ayn !(* ST E ! g c * Karkamis-Jarabulus Akcakale-Tall
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Soil Drainage Classes of Amik Plain Using Landsat Images
    African Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 4 (9), pp. 847-851, September 2009 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/ajar ISSN 1991-637X © 2008 Academic Journals Full Length Research Paper Mapping soil drainage classes of Amik Plain using Landsat images eref Kiliç Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Mustafa Kemal University, Antakya-Hatay, 31034, Turkey. E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected]. Tel.: +90-326-245-5845. Fax: +90-326-245-5832. Accepted 3 August, 2009 Soil drainage is one of the important soil properties affecting plant growth, water transfer and solute transport in soils. Soil drainage is also an environmental component affecting irrigation and soil reclamation, land capability for agriculture, flood control systems, engineering, health and infectious diseases. The objective of this study was to map soil drainage classes by using Landsat image in Amik Plain (Hatay, Turkey). Terrain and vegetation are characterized by digital terrain attributes, and vegetation indices using a LANDSAT-7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper Image. The study benefits from five data sources: Landsat ETM image, topographic maps, soil maps, State Hydraulic Works (DSI) land cover records and ground data from field surveys. Image classification was carried out using Maximum Likelihood (ML) Classification with supervised training. Soil drainage classes were determined, thus finalizing the process of mapping after each mapping unit and drainage class prepared as a result of the ML classification were validated on site. According to the drainage map prepared using satellite image and ground data, 51,4% (37,234 ha) of Amik Plain are well drained and moderately well drained.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anatomy of the Turkish Military's Political Autonomy Author(S): Ümit Cizre Sakallioğlu Source: Comparative Politics, Vol
    The Anatomy of the Turkish Military's Political Autonomy Author(s): Ümit Cizre Sakallioğlu Source: Comparative Politics, Vol. 29, No. 2 (Jan., 1997), pp. 151-166 Published by: Comparative Politics, Ph.D. Programs in Political Science, City University of New York Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/422077 Accessed: 31-01-2019 14:30 UTC REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: https://www.jstor.org/stable/422077?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms Comparative Politics, Ph.D. Programs in Political Science, City University of New York is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Comparative Politics This content downloaded from 139.179.72.51 on Thu, 31 Jan 2019 14:30:58 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms The Anatomy of the Turkish Military's Political Autonomy Umit Cizre Sakallioglu The most profound contradiction marking Turkish democracy in the 1990s is the demonstrated inability of civilian politicians to control the military. The Turkish military enjoys a strong degree of military autonomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydropolitics and Issue-Linkage Along the Orontes River Basin:… 105 Realised in the Context of the Political Rapprochement in the 2000S, Has Also Ended (Daoudy 2013)
    Int Environ Agreements (2020) 20:103–121 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-019-09462-7 ORIGINAL PAPER Hydropolitics and issue‑linkage along the Orontes River Basin: an analysis of the Lebanon–Syria and Syria–Turkey hydropolitical relations Ahmet Conker1 · Hussam Hussein2,3 Published online: 13 December 2019 © The Author(s) 2019 Abstract The Orontes River Basin is among the least researched transboundary water basins in the Middle East. The few studies on the Orontes have two main theoretical and empirical shortcomings. First, there is a lack of critical hydropolitics studies on this river. Second, those studies focus on either the Turkish–Syrian or Lebanese–Syria relations rather than analysing the case in a holistic way. Gathering both primary (international agreements, government documents, political statements and media outlets) and secondary sources, this paper seeks to answer how could Syria, as the basin hydro-hegemon, impose its control on the basin? This study argues that the lack of trilateral initiatives, which is also refected in academic studies, is primarily due to asymmetrical power dynamics. Accordingly, Syria played a dual-game by excluding each riparian, Turkey and Lebanon, and it dealt with the issue at the bilateral interaction. Syria has used its political infuence to maintain water control vis-à-vis Lebanon, while it has used non-cooperation with Turkey to exclude Tur- key from decision-making processes. The paper also argues that the historical background and the political context have strongly informed Syria’s water policy. Finally, given the recent regional political developments, the paper fnds that Syria’s power grip on the Orontes Basin slowly fades away because of the changes in the broader political context.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Information Brochure
    INVENTORY OF SHARED WATER RESOURCES IN WESTERN ASIA INVENTORY OF SHARED WATER RESOURCES IN WESTERN ASIA AbOuT ThE Inventory The Inventory of Shared Water Resources in Western Asia is the first effort led by the united Nations to catalogue and characterize transboundary surface and groundwater resources in the Middle East. It is a desk study AbOuT ESCWA by the united Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA) and the German Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural The united Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA) Resources (bGR), which has been developed in close consultation with is one of the five Regional Commissions of the united Nations Secretariat. It national, regional and international experts. Through the inter-governmental focuses on cross-sectoral approaches for achieving sustainable development Committee on Water Resources and nominated focal points, ESCWA member and integrated natural resources management by informing regional policies, countries have actively participated in the preparation of this Inventory, dialogue and cooperation. ESCWA comprises Arab countries in Western Asia including the identification of shared basins, the compilation of information and North Africa: bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, and the review of chapters. Oman, Palestine, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the Sudan, the Syrian Arab Republic, Tunisia, the united Arab Emirates and Yemen. The Inventory follows a standardized structure, with 9 surface water chapters and 17 groundwater chapters that systematically address hydrology, hydrogeology, water resources development and use, international water AbOuT bGR agreements and transboundary water management efforts. The chapters cover all rivers and groundwater resources shared between and by Arab bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe (bGR) is the German countries in the Middle East.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Shared Water Resources in Western Asia
    INVENTORY OF SHARED WATER RESOURCES IN WESTERN ASIA دراسة مسح الموارد المائية المشتركة في غربي آسيا Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources Copyright © 2012, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA) and the German Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR). How to cite: ESCWA-BGR Cooperation, 2012. Inventory of Shared Water Resources in Western Asia (Online Version). Chapter 7: Orontes River Basin. Beirut. Chapter 7 Orontes River Basin INVENTORY OF SHARED WATER RESOURCES IN WESTERN ASIA CHAPTER 7 - ORONTES RIVER BASIN Orontes River Basin EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Also known as the Assi River, the Orontes is the only perennial river in Western Asia that flows north and drains west into the Mediterranean Sea. Its flow regime shows typical winter peak flows due to increased precipitation, and summer low flows maintained exclusively by groundwater discharge. The river is mainly used for irrigation purposes with several agricultural projects planned in the three riparian countries. Water quality at the headwaters is generally good, but deteriorates in the middle and lower reaches of the river due to agricultural, urban and industrial activities. There is no basin-wide agreement between the three riparians, but there are several bilateral agreements in place on issues such as water allocation (Lebanon-Syria) and the joint The Dardara Falls on the Orontes in Lebanon, 2009. Source: Andreas Renck. construction of infrastructure (Syria-Turkey). Orontes Basin politics are heavily influenced MAIN AGREEMENTS by the status of Turkish-Syrian relations in general, and discussions over the sharing of the 1994 – Agreement on the Distribution of Orontes Euphrates River in particular.
    [Show full text]
  • Euphrates-Tigris
    0 [Type here] Irrigation in Africa in figures - AQUASTAT Survey - 2016 Transboundary River Basin Overview – Euphrates-Tigris Version 2009 Recommended citation: FAO. 2009. AQUASTAT Transboundary River Basins – Euphrates-Tigris River Basin. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Rome, Italy The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way. All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licencerequest or addressed to [email protected].
    [Show full text]