<<

Tum Volumes Dem 4150 a es with s nume , y , p g , p , rous

mtious and la e s e ar t fllust a e Chart . Pr , m p ice S imGuineas .

Riv e rs O f Life ;

S OURCE S AN D S TREAMS OF THE FA ITHS O F MAN IN ALL L DS AN , SHOWING THE EV O LUT IO N O F FAI T HS FROM THE RUDEST SYMBOLISMS TO THE LATEST SPIRIT UA L DEV ELO PME N TS .

J R - G RAL M E E J . C . R . F RL G A O N O ON ,

&c . , 85

C o nt e nt s o f V o l . I .

I . INTRODUCTORY II . REE WORSHI T PP III . SERPENT AND HALLIC WORSHIP IV . FIRE WORSHIP V . U ORS AS N W HIP V I. NCESTOR WORSHIP

Co nt e nt s o f V o l . II .

II E O E A KALDIA V . ARLY FAITHS WESTERN SIA AS IN AND ASSYRIA . pages 1 - 1 41 AB G N E V III . FAITHS OF WESTERN ORI I ES IN UROPE AND ADJ ACENT COUNTRIES 1 42 - 448 IX E AB G N ON -A A . FAITHS OF ASTERN ORI INES, RYAN, RYAN AND SHEMITIC 449 - 622

A pp e ndix e s .

A C E C BY . S, 7 Zi I OLOUR D HART OF ALL FAITH STREAM S FEET EE , R F T EITHER FOLDED OR ON OLLER . MAP K W B C , S C R .C. S W G OF WORLD A NO N A OUT SE OND ENTURY , HO IN R EAR LY ACES AND FAITHS . K M AP A B S ETCH OF NCIENT INDIA, AND PROM ALUCHISTAN TO AN W G E TRIE ES P &c AM, SHO IN ARLY , THEIR SACRED LACES, . L TA B LE G GOD - SYNOPTICA OF ODS, IDEAS, AND MANY FEATURES W H V IE HIC ALL FAITHS HA E MORE OR LESS IN COMMON . ON R 3 BY 2 1 N OLLER THIS IS FEET I CHES . ’ “ GEN ERAL FORLON G S RIV ERS OF LIFE .

G G has now i e n t o t he ub lic in t wo ma ni c ent art o ENERALFORLON g v p , g fi qu o mes and c hart t he rst inst a ment of his reat wor o n c om arat i e v lu , fi l g k p v re i ion and on t he nat ura e o t ion of exist in ait hs which has e en in . l g , l v lu g f , b preparat ion for t he last seven ye ars . The import anc e Of t his work c onsist s in it s being t he fi rst t o apply t he re s ult o f mode rn re se arch and learning t o t he great s ubj e ct of A siat ic religions in a h r h n a d manner an r ad h n ist of G ene ra t o oug ly u bi se . N 0 one c e t e lo g l l ’ Forlon a horit i s wi ho t se in is we t o dat e in his readin g s ut e t u e g t hat he ll up g, a t ho h he has also c ons l t e d man a e a t horit ie s now rare re ad l ug u y valu bl u ly ,

ein c ont aine d in ondero s and x n i e fo ios . The wor s of Max Mul er b g p u e pe s v l k l , Rh s Da ie s ea Cox S a c e and man ot her st andard a thorit ie s on y v , B l, , y , y u f o rie nt a s e c t s ; of irch and r sch Renou and Mas ero in E t , O l ubj B B ug , f p gyp H a We st and Darmest e t e r in Persia t o et her wit h t he at est acco nt s of ug , g l u t ra e ers in Pa es t ine in China in A rica and America ha e all e en v ll l , , f , , v b t o show how ransacked for informat ion. General Forlong is general ly able it t e man writ ers real now of t he meanin of t he c s t oms t radit io ns l l y ly k g u , , s m o is ms and s ers t it ions concernin which t he writ e . y b l , up g y The volume s are ac companie d by a large separat e Chart (price which wil l b e fo und very u s e ful for st udent s anx io us t o obt ain a c lear idea of t he re at ion and ant i it Of t he different reli ions s st ems and of t he c onst it ent s l qu y g y , u of t hose s st ems . The ario s c t s of t he Tree t he S er e nt and Lin am t he y v u ul , p g , Fire t he A nc e st or and t he S un wit h t he at er more s irit a c onc e t ions of , , , l p u l p deit as a Fat he r and a S irit are dis in ish d c o o red st reams and y p , t gu e by l u ; t he s t udent at a glance can s ee whic h of t hese ideas is embraced by any i in r d ex st g c e e . Man a a e dat a chrono o ica and h sica m t ho o ic al and e thnic a y v lu bl , l g l p y l , y l g l, are i en on t he mar in Of t he chart and all t he re at i es of A sia and g v g , g B bl ,

Af ric a and E ro e are shown in re at i e osit ion. , u p , l v p ’ G eneral Forlong s chie f c laim t o sp eak on these ques t ions lies in t he fact t hat he is not a mere oo worm or com i er b ut an act i e ex orer and a b k p l v pl , st dent who has isit ed t he sacre d ac es of which he t reat s and has re c ei ed u v pl , v from t he lips Of living B rahmans and Bik shus t he ir own int erpre t at ion Of t he m sm O f t he ancient Fai h In e ral For on wished sy boli t s of dia. When Gen l g t o nderst and Rome or De hi er sa em or S hechem he isit ed t hose ac e s u lp , J u l , v pl himse f ust as he has isit e d t he amo s Indian sit es and as in our own l , j v f u , is ands he has st died t he r der st on m nume nt s En and S c ot and and l , u u e o Of gl , l , Ire and on t he s ot and t he i ht of e xist in remains in India and e s e l p , by l g g l where . In c as es where he has not so isit ed t he sit e he has di i e nt co e ct ed v , l g ly ll t he mo st re cent and a t hent ic in orma ion and wit h s ch know e d e of his u f t , u l g s e c t s he c om ine s as we ha e seen a Wide readin of t he at est and t he ubj b , v , g l e ar ie st it erat re re ardin t he m in s ome 7 00 oo s man in ei ht or t en l l u g g b k , y g

o mes e ach . The i st rat ions a one of his wor man of which are v lu llu l k, y admira o d s et ches rom t he ori ina are of t he reat est a e t o t he bly b l k f g l , g v lu s t dent and his o mes wit h t heir c are indexes orm a st o reho se o f u , v lu , ful , f u re se arch and earnin in which re writ er mi i ho t exha st l g, fut u s ght dig long w t u u in ma ri g t e al .

Copies may be obtained from the Publisher of the present ume vol . PR I T V E S YM B O L S M I I ,

A S ILLU S TRATED IN

PHA LL C WO R H P I S I .

PRIMIT IV E S YM B‘ O LIS M

A S ILLU ST R A T ED IN

Eb al l i c W o rs hi p

T H E RE PRO DU CT IV E PRIN CIPLE

W HO DDER M . ES TRO FF

VV T II A DJ I N TRR OHD U CYF I O PJ B Y L .

G ENE RA L F O RL ONG

A .I .C. E . ETC , “ ! V AUTHOR OF RI ERS OF LIFE .

L OND ON G E O R G E R E D W A Y Y O R K S T R E E T C O V E N T G A R D E N

M DCCC LXXXV .

T I N T RO DU C I O N .

TH IS work is a mult ufli in par -no of the growth and

a o f P a as a O f spre d h llicism, we commonly c ll the worship a f n ture or ertilizing powers . I felt, when solicited to enlarge and illustrate it on the sudden death O f the

am a t a - it a l ented u hor, th t would be desecr tion to touch so complete a compendium by one O f the most competent and soundest thinkers who have written on this world- Wide

a N w saw a a f ith . one kne better or more cle rly th n

M r W e st ro a O and . pp th t in this ldest symbolism worship lay the fo undations O f all the goodly systems we call R n b ut a l a eligio s ; unfortun te y, though writing cle rly, he has only left to us short and somewhat detached E a a I a . I was ss ys, this being the longest h ve come cross t , f I a o f a and there ore, with deep concern he rd his de th, saw his perhaps last note pencilled at the end O f the —L“ proof- sheets Confined to bed with a severe attack of ” dyspepsia.

' a a Pa a a a i He re d per, which justly ttr cted much ttent on, 1 8 0 A a S L in 7 , before the nthropologic l ociety, ondon, in da w as the ys hen such subjects were then possible, they are a M r not now, owing to admission of l dy members . .

. . N ew Y a in 1 8 J W Bouton, of ork, incorpor ted this 75 ’ M r a a a a a Pa O f a with . St nil nd W ke s v lu ble per the s me o and m peri d some others, the whole for ing his useful publication entitled A ncient Symbol Wors hip in t he Religion: nti uit M a O f a d —as of A q y. ny the facts there st te true for all time and necess ary to S how the contin uity of the iv Int roduction.

a — f ith will be found in the present epitome, our only regret being that this short historical summary does not extend further in time and space as down to these days and a E a M r isl nds, indeed to urope in gener l, for . ’ W e st rO pp s researches had assured him that if the O ld worships are now only dimly perceptible it is not yet so a — na has with the ncient symbolisms y, the tendency been a a a a a to mplify these, especi lly in ecclesi stic l rchitecture, a a & c a a a orn ment tion, rites, vestments, . He ppe rs to h ve a a fa and a been, from divers c uses, verse to drive cts rgu ments home into the midst of existing faiths and sacred a a a books, for this is to incre se the dislike n tur lly inherent and a to the subject, to wound m ny of the tenderest emo O f a a a a O f a tions l rge cl ss, especi lly the more ignor nt a O f and R a dherents our own other eligions . These c nnot distinguish between the religious student of ancient and art a a O f l modern , tr cing the v rious growths cu ts in symbols and a has ritu ls, from the sceptic or worse, who come to a and and pull down the s cred groves gods, thus uproot

all O the cherished feelings with which their holy bjects , rites and festivals inspire them.They are willing to smile over the idea O f the origin O f a church spire or temple a and a at a min ret, to l ugh wh t they think is the mere

ingenuity of the inquirer, but they frown when the inquiry and a are a a v goes further, solid f cts dv nced pro ing that their faith is in every detail a mere evolution of Faiths that

as m are preceded it, just they the selves of previous men . They are willing to accept from a poetical point O f view that there has been no entirely new religion from the ” and m a a a beginning of the world, fro philologic l, th t

a a has v a a and our lph bet evolved from pre ious lph bets, a a a these from some scr tchings of s v ge tribes, but not to Int roduction. v carry such evolution theories beyond or into their fancied

v a Ye t are a di ine ide ls . if we to instruct people right or to a an a investig te import nt subject we must do so thoroughly, and a a a far- a , m rsh lling our f cts, show their re ching sig nificanc e all a at a far as in their be rings, le st so the are a a e O f and ot a instructed c p bl comprehending, n to th t ma a extent only which they y prefer . The ncient priest had and and his esoteric exoteric doctrines mysteries, with the O bject O f alluring and keeping within his fold all

a men and a m nner of , women children, but here we spe k

carin onl t hat t he know t he t rut h a unto men g y y , not th t ' a O f an o t he r b ut they be won over to our view or th t y , ‘

. M r W e t ro that they act according to their lights . s pp here takes the best course in the present crass ignorance O f Europe by simply massing together a few pregnant a a f and all a ma a f cts . He voids the doubt ul th t y le d to and a a and a l a e a controversy nnoy nce, c lm y rehe rs s his c se as a a and f d a philosopher, physici n rien , who desires th t “ the inquirer should know something O f his whence ” and at l a far as whither, e st so the study of history and a n sa a hum nity ca teach him . We must here y few ’ words regarding the author s very apposite quotations on 1 a a ff p . 4 , for they point to the r dic l di erence between “ ” a reli ion an R li i ns re l g d e g o . These have been always more or less superstitions or a a and beliefs resting m inly on priestly ssertions, unproved O n a n a a P fte incomprehensible, reg rdi g supern tur l owers,

and uas i deities, or spirits events in the q histories of these, a and a O f which t he o f ccording to, on ccount , followers l e d a w e t o a na thes i e ls er required sh pe their conduct, y,

w as na a o f 0 their very thoughts . This the origi l ide

Re no t rue reli ion ligion, but such is g , for this simply con vi Int roduct ion.

‘ O f a a and f sists living just , mor l righteous li e, guided by ' a t he highest ethical ideas we have e ach ttained unto . The “ ” Religens or Religious ones were simply those who “ ” separated themselves from what they called the world a in order to serve their gods , b nding themselves together

a a a s a & c . as in solit ry pl ces, c ve , temples, mon steries, , so ’

b O Rel i io and aw . the etter to bserve ( g ) their vows, rites l s

a h a Theor a These l st t ey believed c me from their , All h or

v Re x R P had a . A other di ine , egis or rophet ll tribes l ws

O f a given to them by their priests, which, perh ps, the

' S Dharma and Vincz a most perfect pecimen is the y , the ” t henzir Heavenly Law and Way or Discipline O f

Budhist s a a O f Rele are . The origin l me ning g to bind ” fast - was simply a consecration to one particular pur

a a . T a pose, not necess rily holy one he priests releg ted

ma sa a a re themselves, we y y, to continu lly re ding over, o r a r O f viewing, going b ck upon the se vices their gods for ever rehearsing praises and prayers to them in order to a and a a a a ple se them vert c l mities which they fe red . It w as no part O f the design O f the Religenr to serve or a a ple se their fellows, to inculc te virtue, honour, truth ,

a a O f a a goodness, or even ch stity, not to spe k high mor l “ ” “ nd a T he R a intellectu l life . truly eligious or Holy ” man was as un a . a , such, entirely mor l He did not dmit that the ethics which guided him in his social or family life had any place within the hallowed circle O f his temple O f m a m or faith. Here he knew no or lity or i morality ; all

and O f a v and symbols, rites customs the f ith were di ine, ,

as a a a was a O f reg rds the s nctu ry, he but the serv nt his

n onl t o honour and s erv e Him and god , strivi g y , for this purpose see king even to debase himself by the most and e O ff as shocking h inous ences , such he would not, if Int roduct ion.

a man a a fa otherwise good , for moment t oler te in the mily w as a n or a circle . Thus there neither sh me immor lity in

O f Milit t a Héro do t o s the rites described by , nor in the priestly functions practised to this day by the G o sains or “ ” M fiha Riij as of Krishna ; nor in the Jewish leader “ giving a share O f the captured Midian women to the ” “ ’ ” N um . L Lord ( . xxxi nor yet in the ord s house

O f a and . Reli ions being full sh meless women, worse g a a d for were not pr ctic l guides for the worl , but the

Reli ens and O f a a and rac g the services the s nctu ry, only p tical and pious philosophers like Confucius and Budha E Pa strove to supply to mankind real religion. ven ul ”— t aught that the wisdom O f the G reeks morals or “ ” and a a a works , intellectu l tt inments, were foolish ”— ness worldly matters beneath the notice of the truly religious that the ignorant faith O f a babe w as what and f Pa all C a men should strive for, ollowing ul, the hristi n a fe w L and f thers with exceptions, down to even uther “ ” Ca a a . R lvin, t ught very simil r doctrine eligion , they “ ” “ ” a was a Fa irt ir a s id, ith, p , belief or loy lty to the

- a and a a a god ide t les concerning the god or his inc rn tions , “ ” and a was ci ist ia a the gre test sin or irreligion p , or w nt ” O f a S O M ahamadans a R Islci nz f ith . c ll their eligion , or ” Fa and Islami s are a a . L ith, only ccepted by All h uther was a O f O f 4 m a horrified t much the writing 7 m. He c lled “ ” an O f a and a a a it epistle sh m by no postle, bec use th t

a a a Can a av an writer sks with m zement, f ith s e y one Jerome frequently urges that all secular improvement only and a a merits divine punishment, virtu lly th t those who n all a a and a a are l O f ig ore physic l , soci l mor l l ws chi dren

N O a the unseen but heavenly kingdom . good Christi n doubted that unbelievers were to be damned (though our viii Int roduction.

can a O f and a beliefs only follow the l ws evidence), th t

G a & c . a and men like lileo, Bruno, , however mor l , good

pious in the best sense of these words, were justly con de mn and a ed to fire here here fter. On these grounds a G S Okri t e s lso, reeks murdered , well known for piety, and and a justice, righteousness, b nished unbelieving Aris i ” t o t le Pro t a o ras and m R , g , others fro their highly eligious S t was a O f sa in o f society . . Augustine in the h bit y g such really religious men : predes tinat i s unt in a t ernum ignenz ire cumdiabolo and many Christians besides Ignatius Loyol a urged that the highest virtue in a Christian is ” a O f and a the s crifice the intellect, the gre test sin, lis ” a O f a tening to the dict tes re son .

all O f reli ion In this we see the childhood true g , which is ” a a O f a a Reli ions now s pping the found tions wh t is c lled g .

Mr W e st ro a a a a . pp shows their fund ment l ph se, or th t substratum fromwhich a beautiful pl ant is now vigorously putting forth its strength in a few favoured localities ; for “ ” N at ure w ors hip is still the prevalent Religion O f the world and Her M ajesty rules over six Worshippers O f the Reproductive Powers for every Christian in her vast

. I us a empire t behoves , therefore, to study these m tters

- a R li ions a are if we would know what so c lled e g re lly .

G R. FO RLO N G . J . . W R S H IP PHA LLIC O .

TH E O f a a and a identity hum n n ture of the hum n mind , all and all t he in times in countries, is key to the solution ’ o f many phenomena in the development O f man s mind and a n ture. a a and a Hum n n ture is one the s me everywhere. The same wants beget the invention and use of the same a me ns to supply those wants . ’ a a The workings of m n s mind, being obedient to simil r a are a and a l ws, the s me, the thoughts, suggestions, ide s and a a a all ctions proceeding from them, ne rly identic l in a a a man countries ; the s me ide s rise within the mind of , a suggested by the s me objects . a and a a a and Hence simil r n logous ide s, beliefs, super st it ious practices are frequently evolved independently

a ff are su e s mong di erent peoples . These the result of gg tions arising spontaneously in the human mind at certain a and a st ges of its development, which seem lmost a univers l . A a a a a I a a s rem rk ble inst nce of this, h ve dr wn up the o f a following sketch ph llic worship, which is one of those

‘ beliefs or superstitious practices which have sprung up

and S a and a independently pont neously, which seems to h ve a a a a extensively prev iled mong m ny n tions . It will acquire additional interest when it is considered

’ a O f a su e rst i th t it is one , if not the most ncient of the p 0 N at ure and Earl M an y .

* a a a has a tions of the hum n r ce, th t it prev iled more or a all a and a less mong known peoples in ncient times, th t it has been handed down even to a very l ate and Christian period. In the earlier ages the O perations O f nature made a m a stronger impression on the inds of men . Those ide s, springing from the constant O bservation of the modes of a a a cting in n ture, were consequently more re dily suggested to the minds of all races of men in the primitive ages . Two causes must have forcibly struck the minds of men in those early periods when observant of the opera a a tions of n ture, one the gener tive power, the other the

e a and a v a . r productive, the ctive the p ssi e c uses This two- fold mode o f production visible in nature must have given rise to comparisons with the mode of proceeding in a a a t wo a the gener tion of nim ls, in which c uses concur, the one active and the other passive ; the one male and

al as a as . the other fem e, the one f ther, the other mother These ideas were doubtless suggested independently and S pontaneously in different countries ; for the human mind is so constituted that the s ame O bjects and the same O perations of nature will suggest like ideas in the minds all a a a of men of r ces, however widely p rt . N a a man was ma b ut a ture to the e rly not brute tter, a and o being invested with his own person lity, end wed a a n and a with the s me feelings, p ssio s, performing the s me a functions . He could only conceive the course of n ture a a a an a from the n logy to his own ctions . By e sy illu

S S e x w o rshi is as anc ie nt as st ar wo rshi if not mo re so . u c h p p, phallicism was t he e x po ne nt O f t he princ ipl e o f re ne wal and reproduc t n It as t he mo st nat ra r r idea o f c re at ion. io . w u fo m o f e x p e ssing t he — l B auw ich E tian B eli . 2 8 . , gyp gf, p 5 Deity and S ew.

” sion the functions of human nature were transferred to a a M an a n physic l n ture . not only ttributed his own mi d and a a feelings to the powers of n ture, but lso the func

O f a — a — re - tions his n ture gener tion, begetting production, bringing forth ; they became his ideas of cause and ff S un a a and e ect . To the the gre t fecund tor, the chief cause of awakening nature into life ; to the

‘ Ea a O f all rth, the gre t recipient, in the bosom which

are man a a things produced, ttributed the s me powers and re - as a a modes of production in hum n n ture . The a man a a hum n intellect being finite, is inc p ble of imagining a personal god inseparable from the functions

a a S e x was of hum n n ture . given to them ; the S un was a a ; or sky considered the m le, or ctive power Ea a a was the rth, the fem le or p ssive power. The sky the fecundating and fertilizing power ; the earth was as at as looked upon the mould of n ure, the recipient of a was seeds, the nurse of wh t produced in its bosom . An analogy was suggested in the union of the male and a a are a fem le . These comp risons found in ncient writers . “ ” * “ JEsch lus a at The bright sky, y s ys, loves to penetr e a a a a a the e rth ; the e rth, on her p rt, spires to the he venly a a Ra a a S k a m rri ge . in f lling from the w tery y impregn tes a and a a O f the e rth, she produces for mort ls p stures the ” “ ” f and C . P a locks, the gifts of eres The sky, lut rch “ a a a a s ys , ppe red to men to perform the functions of

a as a a was f ther, the e rth those of mother. The sky the a a a f ther, for it c st seed into the bosom of the e rth, which on receiving them became fruitful and brought forth and ” wa s the mother. This union has been sung in the fol ’ lowing verses by V irgil - r

! D anaides Fra Herm Geor . u 2 ( g . . ) f g . 3 5 . I 2 Primitiv e Ideas .

T um pat e r o mnipot e ns fe c undis imb rib us fEt he r

is Co nj ug in gre mium lac t ae de sc e ndit .

C a has a a a olumell rel ted, in his tre tise on griculture, the

O f a o r a a av and a loves n ture, the m rri ge of he en e rth, a a at a which t kes pl ce the spring of the ye r.

R m O f a as M rs. everence for the ystery org nized life, C a a and hild writes, led to the recognition of m sculine feminine principle in all things S piritual or materi al . E a was e a very element l force divid d into two, the p rents o f . a was a other forces The ctive mind m sculine, the a productive e rth was feminine . “ ” E a a D r G M oabit e minent schol rs , rem rks . insburg ( “ S t one a a , p ge who h ve devoted themselves to the

v a nO f a a n a in estig tio ncient cults, h ve shown to demo str tion that the most primitiv e idea of G od was that he a a a a and and consisted of du l n ture, m sculine feminine, the connubial contact O f this androgynous Deity gave ” a birth to cre tion . “ v a as M r The di ine power in cre tion, . Bonwick was a a a a a a writes, lw ys reg rded mong the ncients from ” ii a gener tive point of V iew . These ideas bear a prominent part in the religious a a E D creeds of sever l n tions . In gypt the eity or prin

c i le a was a a - p of gener tion Khem, c lled the f ther the a a a a as M a was a bstr ct ide of f ther, the goddess ut th t of i m O ffi was no t other . The ce of Khem confined to the

if T he first v e rse o f t he Boo k o f G e ne sis de c l are s c re at io n t o have b e e n a se rie s o f Toledoth o r ene rat ions It is ro e r t rans at e d , g . p p ly l — ’ G od (t he El ohim o r rat he r A lé - im) e nge nde re d ( B RA ) t he he av e ns ” me o d and t he e art h A In t he an a e O f at o The S re G . l gu g Pl up e ne rat d e rad a s cc e ssi f e e t s irit o o of e t h u u o n o d ndan s f ds, g g l p p , g mo s r me n de n , of he oe s and Of .

1 4 S it/ a and Brahma.

o f a . A system initi tion sole deity, invested with the O f — a sa o t he t w o rinci les power production th t is to y, f p p , male and emale— he a all f cre ted himself before things , and a a was a ff n a a the rriv l of the gods only di usio , m ni fe st at ion of his different faculties and of his all- powerful ” . a a G will In hymn the deity is thus ddressed, lory to a all a a a thee who h st begotten th t exists, who h st m de ” man a a , who h st m de the gods . E a a a The gypti n Tri ds were composed of f ther, mother, and — a a and a a son th t is, the m le fem le principles of n ture, with their product .

In t he S aiv a Parana S a a : F of the Hindus, iv s ys rom the supreme spirit proceed Purusha (the generative or a P a a m le principle), r kriti (the productive or fem le prin ci le and and was p ) , Time ; by them produced this universe,

a a O f G od all a O f the m nifest tion one . Of org ns and sense intellect, the best is mind, which proceeds from a a a a a a r Ah nk r , Ah nk r f om intellect, intellect from the s a P a upreme being, who is , in f ct, urush . It is the a a and primev l m le, whose form constitutes the universe, a and a a whose bre th is the sky ; though incorpore l, th t ” a m le am I .

a Tat wa S a a In the Krity , iv is thus ddressed by “ Bri hma a O L art a ; I know th t Thou, ord, the etern l

a a Br hm, th t seed which, being received in the womb S a a of the kti ( ptitude to conceive), produced this universe ; that thou united with thy S akti dost create the universe from this own substance like the web from the ’ spider In the same creed S iva is described as the per

onificat ion O f S a i a s ury , the sun ; Agn , the fire, or geni l

a ad a and vivifie s all h e he t which perv es, gener tes, y ; is ' fl ' a P inci l I he Fem le r p e. 5

Bhfiva o f Bhavi ni a , the lord the univers l mother, goddess o f a n a h n ture a d of the e rt . In one of the hymns O f the Rig V eda quoted by

P f M a Hinduis m . 2 6 ro essor onier Willi ms ( , p ) we per c e ive a a a a t he the . first dim outline of the rem rk ble ide th t Creator willed ’ to produce the universe through the — agency and co - O peration of a female principle an idea which afterwards acquired more definite shape in the sup a a o f a and a V a a posed m rri ge he ven e rth . In the ed lso various deities were regarded as the progeny resulting a Ea D a a from the f ncied union of rth with y us, he ven ; just as much O f the l ater mythology may be expl ained by a supposed blending of the male and female principles in

—e a S ama V da . a n ture . In the (viii . p 44) the ide is more a fully expressed He felt not delight, being lone . He a and a a a wished nother, inst ntly bec me such . He c used a a and a a his own self to f ll in tw in, thus bec me husb nd and a a and r wife . He ppro ched her, thus we e produced ” a hum n beings . “ ” “ a a a P a was Br hm , the cre tor, writes rofessor Willi ms, a a a t wo m de to possess double n ture, or, in other words , a a — u a a ch r cters one q iescent, the other ctive . The ctive was a a and was as c lled his S kti, personified his wife, or

a a O f The a a the fem le h lf his essence . S kti of the cre tor h a a a a oug t properly to represent the fem le cre tive c p city, but the idea O f the blending O f the male and female prin c iple s in cre at iofi seems to have been transferred to Siva and a Pa a One a O f his S kti rv ti . of the represent tives

S a a - a and a - a a in iv is h lf m le h lf fem le, emblem tic of the a a dissoluble unity of the cre tive principle (hence his n me, ” A rd- hana ris a a a , the h lf fem le lord S a F P a iv represented the ructifying rinciple, the gener I 6 Bab lonian M t holo y y gy.

ha a sun ting power t t perv des the universe, producing , S a a a and a a moon, t rs, men, nim ls, pl nts . His wife, or S kti, was Pa a a a was a a rv ti, for e ch divine person ge ssoci ted a S a a and a man and with consort, to how th t m le fem le, are as wife, ever indissolubly united the sources of repro duction . i s C a a P M uller In hin , ccording to rof. , we find the a a recognition of two powers, one ctive, the other p ssive, a a wh one m le, the other fem le, ich comprehend everything, and o which, in the mind of the more enlightened, t wer a a high bove the gre t crowd of minor spirits . These two powers are within and beneath and behind everything a 1 8 d In a and a th t ouble n ture, they h ve been frequently

- a and a S hu Kin . identified with he ven e rth . In the g we are told that heaven and earth together are the father and all mother of things . At the head of the Babylonian mythology stands a d was a e eity who sometimes identified with the he v ns, as u and a sometimes considered the r ler god of he ven . a This deity is n med Anu . He represents the uni verse as and and the upper lower regions, when these were n a was a A divided the upper regio or he ven c lled nu, while a was a ma the lower region or e rth c lled A tu . Anu being a and Ama a the m le principle, tu the fem le principle, or wife of Anu . i Lab a and La a a S ar and The success ve forms, in h m ,

a are as a Kis r, represented in some of the god lists n mes a a A nn and ma a a or m nifest tions of A tu . In e ch c se a a a a and a there ppe rs to be m le fem le principle, which principles combine in the formation of the universa l

L e c t re s o n t he S c ie nc e o f Re i io n u l g . ’ S mit h s Cha d l e an Genesis . f , p. 5 4 The God t he M oahit es of . 7

A A a was mong the ssyri ns the supreme god, Bel, “ s a and tyled the procre tor his wife, the goddess M a a ylitt , represented the productive principle of n ture, and O f received the title of the queen fertility . Among

a Dr G M a i . o b t e the Assyri n deities, writes insburg ( “ s t one a a a A sht er a , p ge the n me Asht r or me ns a o t o e t he r o ine d a gener tive p wer, tied g , j , coupled connubi l a a a a cont ct, whilst Ast rte is the feminine h lf or comp nion ” o f the productive power . A V ul a nother deity, the god , the god of the tmosphere, b enefic e nt a a is styled the chief, the giver of bund nce, the O f a lord fecundity . On Assyri n cylinders he is represented as a a a a a a a ph llic deity , With him is ssoci ted goddess Sh l , ” a a a whose ordin ry title is S rr t, queen, the feminine of “ ” S ar a h S ir r Raw the word , which me ns c ief. Hen y a a A a a a linson rem rks with reg rd to the ssyri n Sun, or Sh m s,

- a a the sun god, th t the ide of the motive influence of the sun- god in all human affairs arose from the manifest agency a a a N of the m teri l sun in stimul ting the functions of ature. O n the M oabite stone the god of the Moabites is called — a - C C a t he con ueror and Asht r hemosh hemosh me ning q , A a t he roducer— a a an sht r p joint n me, which implies a n a and a InP a ndrogy ous (m le fem le) deity. hoenici n O a a Ghé a and mythology, ur nos (he ven) weds (the e rth) , L a Oc a Ia y her becomes f ther of e nus, , petus, C and ronos, other gods . In conformity with the religious a G s and R ma V ide s of the reek o ns, irgil describes the

“ products of the earth as the result of the conjugal act and a between Jupiter (the sky) Juno (the e rth .) According t A u a a man was a to S . gustin the sexu l org n of consecr ted in a O f a a a the temple of Liber, th t wom n in the s nctu ries O f Liberia ; these two divinities were named father and I 8 Paintin s at Pom eii g p .

. Pa P a mother . According to yne Knight, ri pus, in his a a a a a G ch r cter of procre tive deity, is celebr ted by the reek a poets under the title of Love or Attr ction, the first prin c i le a a a O f and and p of nim tion ; the f ther gods men, the r a nd f ll a egul tor a dispenser o a things . He is s id to ‘ a o f perv de the universe with the motion his wings, bringing “ and a S pure light ; thence to be c lled the plendid, the ” f P a . I G was sel illumined, the ruling ri pus n reece he regarded as t he promoter of fertility both in vegetation and all a a N at alis C in nim ls . According to omes, the worship of was introduced at Athens by virtue O f a a an a comm nd of or cle . Among the paintings found at Pompeii there are several a O f a a and O ff represent tions s crifices of go ts, erings of milk a as a and flowers to Pri pus . The god is represented a a a a a a i i on squ re pedest l, with the usu l ch r cter st cs

“ a r a S a ae of the deity, p ominent ph llus . imil r Herm or

Priapi were pl aced at the meeting O f two or three roads . One of these paintings represents a s acrifice or offering a P a a . T to ri pus, m de by two persons he first is young ’ man a a a a a with d rk skin, entirely n ked, except the nim l s a a skin , which is wr pt round his loins ; his he d is encircled a a a a a a with a wre th of le ves . He c rries in his h nds b sket

are and a ff in which flowers veget bles, the first o erings of a a at his humble f rm . He bends to pl ce them the foot of a small altar on which is a small statue in bronze re pre a a senting the god of g rdens . On the other side is

a a a a a and a w wom n, lso we ring wre th, dressed in yello

a S he tunic with green dr pery . holds in her left

a a and a a . h nd golden dish, in her right v se She appears to be bringing to the god of gardens an O ffering of milk ed 1 The yapanese Cre . 9

b a Pria e uo t annis S inum ac t is e t haac t e i , , q l , l p ” ris hort i. E xpe ct are sat est : c ust o s e s paupe

V ir il E cl V II. . g , . , 33

Offerings were made to Pri apus according to the season of the year

“ sa aut umno omis aest at e fre uent or V e re ro , p , q ” i st horrida e st is h e ms S pic is : una mih e p y .

Pria . V e t er E i r 6 p . pg . 9 .

In another painting Priapus is represented as placed on a a a a . T a squ re stone, g inst which rest two sticks he st tue

o f . a a ca appears to be bronze Its he d is covered with p, a a and he has a sm ll m ntle on his shoulder, exhibits his a a a usual prominent ch r cteristic . The st tue is evidently a and a a placed by the ro d side, he holds stick in his h nd wa a a P a to point out the y to tr vellers . In ri pic figure o f

' bronze he is styled Ewrrjp K o apov as his symbol contributed a d a O f a M to the reproduction n perpetu tion m nkind . utinus was among the Romans the same as Priapus among the G as e rsonificat ions o f reeks, they both were p the fructifying power of N ature. According to Herodotus and Pau s a a a O f M as a ui s st tues ercury were represented ithyph llic . a a a at C The l tter mentions one in p rticul r yllene. ’ “ M r F. V . D O f In . ickens A Brief Account the chief

‘ cosmical ideas now current among the better educated ” “ classes in J apan he writes In the J apanese creed there are two elemental principles from the combination a — a M a ofwhich everything origin tes le, or developing one,

and a F a . Ea em le, or receptive one The rth is supposed to have been formed by the condensation of the Female a S un principle in the middle of the He vens ; the , on the ” a was a Ma contr ry, the product of the gre t le principle . In S int oo a a a the creed in J p n, He ven, or the sky, 2 0 A N ew Z aland h e Myt .

a Ea and ca a a m rried the rth be me the uthor of m nkind,

a a a having first r ised up the dry l nd for their bode,

a - beginning with the isl nd of Kiu Siu, by fishing it up with a a his spe r from the bottom of the oce n . We find similar ideas in the religious creeds of America and a Pa a ofthe remote isl nds of the cific Oce n . According I a C a A a Fama o st ad and to the ndi ns of entr l meric , g Z i alt onal a and a a p , the first m le the second fem le, cre ted a and a man and all he ven e rth, things . “ * a M r As in Orient l legends, writes . Brinton, the origin O f man from the earth was veiled under the story that he was the progeny of some mountain fecundated by a O f M a I a the embr ce ithr s or Jupiter, so the ndi ns often

a n as pointed to some height or some c ver , the spot whence O f a and a the first men issued, dult rmed from the womb

all- Ea of the mother rth. The Tahitians imagined that everything which exists in the universe proceeds from the union of two beings ; o ne O f them was named Taroat aihe t o uno u ; the other Te papa ; they were supposed to produce continually and b a and a y connection the d ys months . These isl nders a and are had supposed th t the sun moon, which gods, a and a begotten the st rs, th t the eclipses were the time of a their copul tion . A N ew Z eal and myth says we have two primeval a a a and a are Ra and ncestors , f ther mother . They ngi

Pa a a and a . T a all p , he ven e rth he e rth, out of which are and things produced, is our mother ; the protecting

v - a a o er ruling he ven is our f ther . It is thus evident that the doctrine of the reciprocal

o a a a and a a principles f n ture, or n ture ctive p ssive, m le

M th O t h Old World . 2 2 y s f e , p 4 .

2 2 A Festiv al in Egypt .

e a and ff a to bring or to hold n cess ries, o ers s crifices as as and a to it, well to the rice mill, other implements th t a a assist her in her household l bours . A c rpenter does a a a and the like hom ge to his h tchet, his dze, other and ff a a a tools, likewise o ers s crifice to them . A Br hm n does so to the style with which he is going to write ; a soldier to the arms he is to use in the field ; a mason to ” and a a b e his trowel ; l bourer to his plough . Hence it a a O f a comes intelligible th t the org ns gener tion, which

contribute to the production of living things, should receive

worship and reverence . Evidence that this worship of the organs of genera tion extensively prevailed will be found in many coun

a and r tries, both in ncient mode n times . It occurs in a E I a S a a P a ncient gypt, in ndi , in yri , in B bylon, in ersi , G I a S a G a S a a a a reece, t ly, p in, erm ny, c ndin vi , mong the G a and a a M a and uls, even in Americ mong the exic ns

P a E a re re eruvi ns . In gypt the ph llus is frequently p as a N sented the symbol of gener tion . umerous writers

a a a n a anhh T tau as S h ve m int i ed th t the , or , ( ) the ign of

was a and crux ansat a life, the ph llus ; the Q the com

a and a a as sis t r um a blued m le fem le org ns just the , or guit r

E and delt a A a of gypt, the (l nds on which the gods pl ayed and produced all life) represented Isis or

a a E ha Herodotus thus describes festiv l in gypt, which he d — “ evidently seen himself The festival is celebrated almost

at In t he Egypt ian hierog yphics ho monyms are fre ue nt u se d t hat is l q ly , , wo rds wit h t wo me anin s o ne t hat o f an ide a t he o t he r t hat o f an O b e c t g , , j . — In t he hie ro hs t he ob e c t was ut fo r t he ide a t h s net er me a glyp , j p u ns ” “ “ n he t “ b ot h G o d a d hat c so a hat che t was pl ac e d for G o d ; ” ” again nofre me ans good and a guit ar ; t he guit ar t he re fo re was “ d aced for goo . pl Q The S mbol o Resurrect ion 2 y f . 3

a a a ex ctly as Bacchic festivals in G reece. They lso use inste d o f a a a a ph lli nother invention consisting ofim ges cubit high, pulled by string women carry round to the a f a vill ges . The these figures is sc rcely less than the rest is member they contri v e f and f . A to move piper goes in ront the women ollow, ” m of a singing hy ns in honour B cchus . These figures doubt a less represented the god Khem or the gener tive principle .

a O ff Ra III Among the roy l erings to Amen by meses . in the G reat Harris Papyrus are loaves (called Tae nhannu) in the form of the phallus . In the Pamelia the Egyptians exhibited a statue pro vide d a . a a with three ph lli In the festiv ls of B cchus, was a as a who considered the s me Osiris , celebr ted by P P a a a 1 2 0 was tolemy hil delphus, gilt ph llus, cubits high, a c rried in procession . T a E a h he ph llus, so conspicuous in gypti n t eology, was a a a a a a ssoci ted with nother ide th n cre tion . It ex Fo r a was pressed resurrection . this re son, it pictured

ffi and a was on co ns, in tombs it told survivors th t there V a was U hope in the future . it lity not extinct . pon this “ M a a z riette finely observes, These im ges only symboli e

a v a a a in very impressi e m nner the cre tive force of n ture, a a without obscene intention . It is nother w y to express celest ial enerat ion a a t o g , which should c use the dece sed ” a enter new life. Ithyphallic representations set forth the resurrection of ’ D enon s E t e a the body . In gyp is figured the represent ’ o f a o d a a a a tion g with green f ce, sun s disk on e ch side, and a a sat st rs round, while below the prominent member a a as a sever l sm ll figures, men w iting for the exertion of the resurrecting power of the deity. 2 The e is h A rh 4 j w .

The V iscount de Rongé gives the following description of a scene re pre sent e d on a sarcophagus The right side presents six personages in the attitude of prayer b e

a w a an . it h fore body ithout he d, shut up in egg This y ’ a a ph llic body s seed is collected by the first two person ges . a O f This scene symbolizes the perpetu l cycle life, which is ” re - a born from the de d . P a was According to tolemy, the ph llus the object of a a and a a religious worship mong the Abyssini ns, lso mong

P a a aa - P was the ersi ns . In Syri B l eor represented with

a a mo nt h a . ph llus in his , ccording to St Jerome . At the a at Hie ro olis a a entr nce of the temple p , hum n figure, a a m 1 2 0 with ph llus of onstrous size, of cubits m height,

was O . a a a man to be bserved Twice e ch, ye r mounted to a a and a the top of this colossus, by the me ns of cord a and piece of wood, fixed in the ph llus, on which he

a . man a a a pl ced his foot This p ssed, it is s id, seven d ys and a seven nights on this ph llus, without sleeping . It was thought that thus raised above the earth and nearer a man ff the bode of the gods , this could o er up vows

and a a a a with more success, thus m ny cl imed the ssist nce a a at of his pr yers, by pl cing precious gifts the foot of the

a . T a and ph llus he Jews did not esc pe this worship, we se e their women manufacturing phalli O f gold and of

v as E x vi. 1 G a F sil er, we find in zekiel 7 . ener l orlong

Riv ers o Li e 1 8— 1 0 a a a ( f , I . 5 7 ) dv nces rguments show ing that the god of the Jewish ark was a sexual symbol

a as E . edut h. c lled, in xodus (xvi the Among the Hindoos a religious reverence was exten

i e l a a and Y F s v y p id to the Ling m the oni . rom time

a a a and has immemori l, symbol (the ling yoni combined) a as a been worshipped in Hindost n the type of cre tion, or l in a A Chrys obery L g . 2 5

S a the origin of life . It is the most common symbol of iv , f and is universally connected with his wo rshipfi “ In the character of the eternal reproductive powers ” “ o f a W P . M a a n ture, rites rof onier Willi ms, he is r ther represented by a symbol (the linga and yoni combined) a an a a and th n by y hum n personific tion, temples to hold

if e s r t n f i made o ut o f sin e c r T he foll owing d c ip io o a l nga a gl h yso b e r is t ake n fro m The Times Of O ct l I t h I88 2 z— A Cus v so s e an yl . , L iNG A —A n e mb e m o f a rimit ive c t whic h in arie d fo rms a e ars . l p ul , v pp in t he m t ho o of India G re e c e E t and t he S e mit ic e o e s y l gy , , gyp , p pl amo n O t he rs and whic h in India has su r ive d t o t he re se nt da has g , v p y, re c e nt b e e n ac e d fo r a t ime in t he c o e c t io n o f Mr. B r c e Wri ht ly pl ll y g ,

' t he mine ra o ist T his c urio s e we e d s mbo o f t he i e - ro d c t i e l g . u j ll y l p u v o we rs o f nat re whic h t o A n o - Indians is known as t he H indo o p u , g l I ’ Lin am o d is fo rme d o f a fine e ar- sha e d c hr so b e r o r c at s e e g g , p p y yl , y s t o ne re re se nt in t he in a o f t he fo o we rs o f S i a se t in a re at e ow , p g l g ll v , g y ll t o az as an a t ar t he oni o r ima e O f fe rt i it o f t he fo o we rs o f p l , y g l y ll

V ishn . A b and o f diamo nds e nc irc e s t he se t t in o f t he t o az u l g p , — whic h is abo ut 1 3 of an inc h in it s re at e st e n t h and be o w ro und g l g , l , t he st a f o d in t he fo rm o f a t runc at e c n ar nd o d o e , e ac e d in o b io us g l , pl v s mb o ism ar e re io s st o ne s —a r b a sa hire a a e e c u u , o w y l l g p y pp , p l y ll c hr sob e r c o ra a ear a h acint hine o r de e amb e r- c o o re d , , u y yl l , p l , y p l arne t a a e e o w sa hire an e me ra d and a diamo nd T he g , p l y ll pp , l , . o d is of 2 2 c arat finene ss and t he he i ht o f t he who e ido is g l , g l l ’ 2 inc h A c rdin t o rit e rs o n re c io s st one s t he c at s . co w u e e 3 g p , y c hr sob e m he d in t m amo n t he H indoo s ne x t t o t h y ryl is a ge l e s ee g e diamond and it is re arde d b t he c o mmon e o e no t o n as a c harm , g y p pl ly a ainst wit c hcraft b ut as c o nfe rrin oo d c k o n t he o sse sso r T his g , g g lu p . o ne is o f dark b rown t he mobi e ra o f o a e scent i ht c ro ssin t he , l y p l l g g i ht t he s o ne i a b i e dire c t io n It s hist o r c an b e t rac e d he g of t n n o l q u . y fo r so me 1 0 0 e ars and an admire r o f t he e m has t rie d t o c o m ut e 7 y , g p

me n h rn r t he numbe r o f millio ns o f H indo o w o who ad j o u e ye d f o m all India t o pay t he ir de vo t io n t o t he go d in t he ye ars b e fo re n e ro O t he ea in o t O f it was se iz e d by a Maho mmedan c o qu r. n b r k g u t he m t in in 1 8 it was re mo e d b t he e e n o f D e hi and she u y 5 7 , v y Q u l , t e d it h it t o t he re se nt owne r par w p .

W s is i m f ab o t inc hes o n of In t he o e c t io n o f D r. i e a n a o 6 c ll l g , u l g, t a i r e d o n it t hat rare st o ne ree n a e nt u rine wi h t he he d of S a c a . g v , v v o iv a 26 Dev ot ees f S .

a e this symbol, which is of doubl form to express the a and a a are blending of the m le fem le principles in cre tion, probably the most numerous of any temples now to be seen in India It is usually placed in the inmost recess a a a a f or s nctu ry, sculptured in gr nite, m rble or ivory, o ten w and a cro ned with flowers, surmounted by golden a a are r and al st r . L mps kept bu ning before it, on festiv a u a a a a occ sions it is ill min ted by l mp with seven br nches, a S a a supposed to represent the pl nets . m ll im ges of this

a a are emblem, c rved in ivory, gold, or cryst l, often worn as a a a orn ments bout the neck . The T ly which the

a a n - a man Br hmin consecr tes, which the ewly m rried a a and was tt ches to the neck of his wife, which she a as as a a Lin bound to we r long she lived, is usu lly am n . T a a d g he pious use them in their pr yers, often D have them buried with them . evotees of S iva have it written on their foreheads in the form of a perpendicular a Ea S a m rk . ch follower of iv is bound to perform the

A b iche am a m a g , cere ony which consists, ccording to S onnerat a , in pouring milk on the ling m , These symbols are found in the temple excavations of a S a and E a a a the Isl nds of lsette leph nt , of unknown nti “ uit ro t t o ~ t em le s E a at S q y ; on the g p of llor , the even ” Pa a C a oa at god s, on the orom ndel c st, in the old temple

a and S a r T njore, elsewhere where iv wo ship is in the a ascend nt . The extent to which the Linga Worship prevails throughout India is thus noticed by Professor Wilson in “ r the A riat ic Reserv e/ye . Its prevalence throughout the a G a as far as a sufli whole tr ct of the nges, Ben res, is cie nt l n . a are y co spicuous In Beng l, the temples com u d a a mo ly erecte in r nge of six, eight, or twelve, on Lin a Wars/J i in India 2 g p . 7

e a a a a Ea ch side of gh ut le ding to the river. ch of n a a a the temples in Be g l consists of single ch mber, a a a a a c of squ re form, surmounted by pyr mid l entre ; a a a a Lin er a the re of e ch is very sm ll ; the g , of bl ck or

a ff are white m rble, occupies the centre ; the o erings pre at e a a sented the threshold . B n res , however, is the peculi r a f o f a V iswe s se t of this orm worship, the princip l deity, “ ” ' a a The all a a and mo st w r , Lord of , is ling , of the chief objects of the pilgrimage are similar blocks o f Pa a a stone . rticul r divisions of the pilgrim ge direct visit

f - Lin ar all - t a ing orty seven g , of pre eminen s nctity ; but

are o and there hundreds of inferior note still w rshipped, ” a a and a a a a a thous nds whose f me f shion h ve p ssed w y . For ages before and up to the period of the Moham a a I a med n inv sion of ndi in the eleventh century, there were twelv e great and specially holy Lingas in various a a S M a p rts of Indi . ome were destroyed during the oh m

w as o f a . O na med n conquest ne of them the idol Som th,

a five and block of stone four or cubits high, of pro a a r port ionat e thickness . Br hminic l ecords refer it to the a an a ar time of Krishn , implying ntiquity of ye s . a a S va It is very prob ble th t the worship of i , under the

a a a as a as type of the Ling , prev iled throughout Indi e rly the fifth or sixth century of the Christian e ra ; but

phallic worship existed from unknown time . O ne of the forms in which the Linga worship appears

a Lin a e t s Lin awant s an amas is th t of the g y , g , or J g , the essenti al characteristic of which is wearing the emblem

on some part of the dress or person . The type is of a a and sm ll size, m de of copper or silver, is commonly a a worn suspended in c se round the neck, or in the tur

b an o f . The morning devotions the worshippers of the P n ib 2 8 rayer i T et .

a as an a h Dr Ling , emblem of Siv , is t us described by . D uff in his India and Indian M issions After ascend

‘ a ing from the w ters of the river, they distribute them

a a Ea t a ! a selves long the muddy b nks . ch then kes up a and portion of cl y, beginning to mould it into the form L a a R a a a of the ing m, devoutly s ys, everence to H r ( a S a a a a n me of iv ), I t ke this lump of cl y next ddressing ’ a a ‘S a a a The a the cl y, he s ys, iv , I m ke thy im ge . ling a being now formed, he presents to it w ter from the G a and a ff re nges, v rious o erings . He then worships, hearsing the names and attributes of the god ; and offers all a a flowers round the im ge, commencing from the e st ; — a R 0 a ff f dding : eceive, Siv , these o erings of lowers . ’ nd Thus do I worship thee. A gain a again he worships nd a all a bows . He l st of throws the flowers into the a a S a a a a and w ter, pr ys to iv to gr nt him tempor l f vours

“ blessings ; twines his fingers one into the other ; places the image once more before him ; and then flings it ” a aw y . There is no country in the world where they pray a a a Of more th n in Tibet . An ej culatory pr yer six syl lab le s is continually on the lips of all the inhabitants of a that country. The shepherd repe ts it in tending his a a a a a flocks, the merch nt in w iting purch ser, the women f fi air a o when engaged in household a s. It is s rt of woe maria or repetition of the talismanic words Om mani

a 019 L t b e ew el in t b e lot us p dmi oum, ( ord) j . It is of and India it a had Hindu origin, in could h ve no other source “ ” S a. a a M M a . th n in the worship of iv In f ct, s ys ichel “ N a a S a lin am icol s, it represents symbol of iv , the g in the

am t ha sa ma and a y , t is to y, the union of the le fem le prin

c i le a a mani t he e wel p . With the dorers ofSiv , the ( j ) is one

V us 30 f est iv al of en .

al and and . a ph lus, crowned with violets ivy They w lked

n namel a m a a a a gm . T lo g, repe ting obscene songs, c lled e he a had ad a a l tter their he s covered with wre ths, their h nds and d full of flowers, pretended to be runk . They bore on their waistband large phalli made of wood or a le ther. In the basket carried on the head of the Canephori in D a a was the ionysi c processions, mong other symbols the a ph llus . One of the personages of the comedy of the

’ “ a a a a a and Ach rni ns s ys (v . Adv nce c nephoros, let ” X ant hias a a a . A ( the sl ve) , pl ce the ph llus erect hymn was a a hallic then sung, which Aristoph nes c lls p . The G a a a as a reeks usu lly represented the ph llus lone, direct

a w av a symbol, the me ning of hich seems to h e been mong a a a was the l st discoveries reve led to the initi ted . It a a a as O i the s me, in emblem tic l writing, the rphic ep thet,

‘ ” IIA PI EN ETQ P univ ersal enerat or . , g a E a a Th t which the mysteries of leusis, Tertulli n s ys, as a a consider most holy, th t which is conce led with most a a are a c re, wh t they dmitted to the knowledge of only at a a o f a the l test moment, wh t the ministers religion c lled e o t ae a a e p p , excite the most rdent desire for, is the im g of the virile member. Dr S a a a a . chliem nn gives figure of ph llus of white ma his Tro a a 1 rble in j , p ge 7 3, found in the ruins of the second city. R In ome, in the month of April , when the fertilising w a O a and po ers of n ture begin to per te, its productive a f a powers to be visibly developed, estiv l in honour of

V a a was a a ar enus took pl ce ; in it the ph llus c rried in c t, and led in p rocession by the Roman ladies to the temple

a ne Kni ht P y g . o an M on m t I R m u en s . 3

V o C a and of enus utside the olline g te, then presented a a by them to the sexu l p rt of the goddess . The special time for the erection and worship of the a was as a a a a o f ph llus the spring, we le rn from p ss ge

‘ ‘ Ianzblieb ns De Mys zerizs We say the erection of t he a a a o f ph lli is cert in sign prolific power, which, through a a d this, is c lled forth to the gener tive energy of the worl , o n which account many phalli are consecrated in the

S a h pring, bec use then the w ole world receives from the gods the power which is productive of all gene ’ ration .

Lavinium a da At , they c rried in the streets, every y, a a a a a during month, ph llus rem rk ble for its proportions . The grossest expressions were then used on all sides ; a mother of one of the most distinguished families of the had a a a a city to pl ce crown on this obscene im ge . At l st the disorder reached such a pitch that it attracted the atten R a a a 6 tion of the om n Sen te in the ye r 5 7 . R a a M Tut inus a The om ns n med utinus or , the isol ted a and P a a affi a ph llus, ri pus, the ph llus xed to Hermes . T R a a ff a P a he om n l dies o ered publicly wre ths to ri pus, and a they hung them on the ph llus of the divinity .

kt e is a a as a v The or fem le org n, the symbol of the p ssi e a a a or productive powers of n ture, gener lly occurs on ncient R a as C a V a Fi a om n monuments , the onch eneris , g, B rley d D C an a. orn, the letter elt was P a and The stone, which brought from hrygi , a M G C which represented the gre t other oddess ybele,

a v ulv a kt eis — ha resembled , for it represented the t t is “ sa a a wr1 t e s to y, the fem le org n . In other words, “ M G du M a . . ousse ux, it reproduced one of the ty pes ,

as ’ Ta lor s Trans a e . y ., p g 5 3 2 Th n v r al Cu 3 e U i e s lt . by the image of which the ancients represented the G od N ” dess ature . I T a kt e is was o f n the hesmophori , the the object

a- a a C M st eres public vener tion, ccording to S inte roix . ( y da Pa anisme . g , vol . ii , p .

G a and S a av a na Among the erm n c ndin i n tions, the R a god Fricco corresponds to the Pri apus of the om ns . A S a w as a a mong the xons, he dored under the form of a ph llus .

e ccle siakt ical N a de In his history of the orth, Ad m a a at U a a Brome spe ks of temple ps l , in Sweden , in which the go d Bricco was represented with an enormous a ph llus . a P a was a o f In Sp in, ri pus worshipped under the n me

Ho rt ane s and a N e b rissa r Leb rix a , in the ncient , the mode n , “ l The a n a a was a . town of A d lusi , his worship est b ished ” “ a a N eb rissa a a en a e inh bit nts of , s ys Silius It li s , celebr t a L a and a a the orgies ofB cchus . ight s tyrs b cch ntes, covered a are a with the s cred skin, to be seen there, c rrying during the nocturnal ceremonies the statue of Bacchus Hor ” ’ a S e e Bella Panzco I. t nes . ( , v . This worship has been found in different p arts of

A a M P C at a . In i meric , in exico, eru, hili, H yti the Libr ’ a a o at S was a a e collection, sold some ye rs g otheby s, st tuett

M was t he in solid gold from exico . It thus described in a al a c t ogue The lower portion is very singul r, being

' P a and ma o he a as a a h llic, y theref re me nt represent tion of an aboriginal deity simil ar to the Pri apus of ancient

. I e e mythology t is two inches (five centim tr s) in height, ” and a - an weighs bout seven eighths of ounce . According t o M r S a . tephens, the upright pill r in front of the Y a a a a C a are al temples of uc t n is ph llus . At op n sever Pb allic ars/pi in merica W p A . 33

a a a a monoliths, or ph llic pill rs, some of them in rough st te, and others sculptured ; on one of the latter are carved a a emblems rel tive to uterine existence, p rturition, etc . In Pa was a a and b as nuco found in the temple ph llus, in relief in public pl aces were deposited the s acred menzbra con unct a in coilu a a j . There were lso simil r symbols in Tlasc ala a an a . We re d in ncient document, written by one o f the companions of Fernando Cortez In cert ain and a a at Pa t a countries, p rticul rly nuco, hey dore the

a il a fra le a ph llus ( membro che port no gli uomini g mbe), ” and a a it is preserved in the temples . The inh bit nts of Tlascala also paid worship to the sexual organs of a man and a P a a a wom n . In eru sever l represent tions in cl y of a are ; a Bat an o s the ph llus met with Ju n de g , in his

His t or o t b e Incas an man y f , unpublished uscript in the “ a E a a a t he libr ry of the scuri l, s ys th t in the centre of a a S un at C gre t squ re or court of the temple of the , uzco, was a a o f t he a a a column or pill r stone, of sh pe of lo f of ” a at and a sug r, pointed the top , covered with gold le f. C a are In hili rude ph llic figures found of silver or of gold . a a n M a a a At H yti , ccordi g to . Art ud, ph lli h ve been dis in ff a a and are covered di erent p rts of the isl nd, believed to be undoubtedly the manufacture of the original inha “ b it ant s a A t a an of the isl nd . Hondur s is idol of round ” “ a L L stone with two f ces, representing the ord of ife, a a ff which the Indi ns dore, o ering blood procured from the u é a a prep ce . The Abb de Bourbourg, who m de c reful a M and C a a explor tions in exico entr l Americ , confirms these statements in regard to the Phallic symbolism in

these countries .

It is probable that the mound - builders of N orth

’ S S e r e t o l uie r s n S m o . 0 . q p y , p 5 German 1 2 / n ur 34 y in t b e t J C e t y.

a P r Americ were votaries of the same worship . rofesso has a a S Troost procured sever l im ges in mith country, was a Tennessee, one of which endowed disproportion tely,

a at La a . Dr Ra a like , or the idol mps cus . ms y, of a a a a Knoxville, lso describes two ph llic simul cr in his

and . possession, twelve fifteen inches in length The was a and a shorter one of mphibolic rock, so very h rd a a th t steel could m ke no impression upon it . M a a a Pa In one of the ri nne Isl nds, of the cific a a a a a Oce n, on festive occ sions ph llus, highly orn mented, a n a T a a . c lled by the n tives in s, is c rried in processio Phallic figures are of frequent occurrence in N e w Z e a ’ a Ca B orneo 2 z a P a l nd . In rl Bock s work on , p . 3 , h llic figure is represented in almost the identical position of “ ” in E . a a the god Khem gypt The ph llic ide , writes M r . Bonwick, so strongly represented in every other a as a was p rt of the world the type of cre tive force, not ” a a a and a a unknown in T sm ni Austr li . There are numerous evidences that Phallic worship was a a a M E ret ined to l te period in odern urope . The following notices of Phallic worship in modern

ar a Pb allic s i times e t ken from Boudin on Wor /o p. G a P a was a a In erm ny, the worship of ri pus m int ined

as a as l at h r even l te the centu y. a a S a a 1 2 The inh bit nts of l voni still following, in the th r a a a P a centu y, p g n customs, p id worship to ri pus, under

a Pri e - a a . T the n me of p g l his people, who were hostile had a C a to their neighbours , who embr ced hristi nity, made frequent incursions into the dioceses of M agdeburg and S ax . S a S a a ar ever l xon princes united, bout the ye

1 1 1 0 a a , to implore ssist nce from the neighbouring

. a G a powers They wrote to the prel tes of erm ny, of ascinum Franc Tb e F in e . 35

L a and F a and a de lor orr ine, of r nce, l id before them the p able situation in which the hate of these idol ators had “ ” “ u E a a . pl nged them . very time, they s id, th t these a a a a f n tics ssembled to celebr te their religious ceremonies,

a a Pri e - a a a they nnounce th t their god p g l is, ccording to

a as P a Be l he o r. them, the s me ri pus, or the indecent p g ’ a o ff C a a When they h ve cut some hristi ns he ds, before a a a the prof ne lt r of their god, they utter most terrible ‘ and : Le t - da C howls cry out us rejoice to y, hrist is

a and o ur Pri e - a a v nquished, invincible p g l is his con ’ queror.

F a a S acerdot al ud nzents In r nce, document entitled y g

on Crimes 8 t h r , which seems to be of the centu y, con tains the following If any one performs enchant

o ascinam a a ments bef re thef , let him do pen nce on bre d ” and a w ter during three lents . C C a t h The ouncil of h lons, held in the 9 century,

forbids this custom, inflicts punishment on whoever per it and a at a forms , thus ttests its existence th t period . a 1 2 a Burch rd, who lived in the th century, gives the rticle of this Council in the following words If any one

a a fascinum a do performs inc nt tions before the , he sh ll ” a a and a pen nce on bre d w ter during three lents . T a S a ' C M a he Synod l t tutes of the hurch of ns, which are a 1 2 a of the ye r 47 , inflicts the s me punishment on ” had fascinum whoever sinned before the . In the 1 4th century the S ynodal S tatutes of the Church o f

T a 1 6 a . T ours, of the ye r 39 , forbid these cts hese a a a F and st tutes were then tr nsl ted into rench, the word ” “ fascinum is there explained by that of fe sne If any one performs any incantations before the ” fe sne . 6 S aint Fout in 3 .

’ a L Est oile a In the Journ l of Henry III . by , we re d the following In the same way the institutors of our ceremonies have had no shame of the most ancient a a has pieces of ntiquity, for the god of g rdens been a a a F a W S a dored in so m ny p rts of r nce . itness int Fo ut in V araille s P are a , of , in rovence, to whom dedic ted

a wax the privy p rts of either sex in . The ceiling of the a and a a ch pel is covered with them, when the wind git tes ’ them, it sometimes disturbs one s devotions in honour a was a a a a of the s int . I gre tly sc nd lized, when I p ssed a a a a a F n through th t pl ce, to he r sever l men n med o tin ;

a had a - a a the d ughter of my hostess god mother, l dy of a P Em the n me of outine . When the Huguenots took a a brun, they found mong the relics of the princip l a P a ana ent a church ri pus, of three pieces in the f shion, the top of which was worn away from being constantly washed with wine : the women made a S aint V inaigre of a a a it, to be pplied to very str nge use . When the men

of Orange (the Huguenots) ruined the temple of S t . Eut ro ius a a of p , they found simil r piece sculpture, but a a and a was co rser, covered with skin h ir ; it publicly a a n burnt in the squ re by the heretics, who were ne r bei g ff a a a and su oc ted from the stench from it, through mir cle

a a S a Fout in punishment of the s int . There is nother int a a l in the town of Auxerre . Another in town c l ed

V e rdre o a a S a Fo ut in , in Bourb nn is . There is nother int Bas La V a S a in nguedoc, in the diocese of iviers, c lled int Fo ut in C and a at Po si n de ines, nother g y, to whom women a a h ve recourse when with child, or in order to h ve ” children . S a and a At intes, women children of both sexes c rried a a at a a a in cert in procession, the end of blessed br nch,

” 8 Tb e Fall 3 .

’le corn and was the production of , consequently looked “ upon as a solemn duty consecrated to the Deity ; as “ Pa a was as a yne Knight rem rks, it considered solemn ” a a u C a s cr ment in hono r of the re tor . ar a all a a In those e ly d ys, the oper tions of n ture were consecrated to some divinity from whom they were sup posed to emanate ; thus the sowing of seed was presided over by Ceres . E act a was a In gypt, the of gener tion consecr ted to K A a V ul I a S a ‘ G hem, in ssyri to , in ndi to iv ; in reece, in a a a e Pan and a the primitive p stor l g , to , in l ter times to M P a and in I a . A M a ri pus, t ly to utinus mong the exic ns ,

a was a Triaz olt e nt i the god of gener tion n med . These gods became the representatives of the generative or man and a fructifying powers in n ture . “ L “ a G n a Forlon va Hevi , writes e er l g; is equi lent to

o e G a a Z life, from the reek to live ; thus wh t is c lled ’ a a Eva a a and the f ll , scribed to , or Hevi the fem le, ‘ t he a a a d A dam m le, becomes in re lity the cts connecte a and and with gener tion, conception, production, the de ’ a ‘ struction of virginity. Ad m fell from listening to — Eve and a , she from the serpent tempting her, det ils which merely assure us that we have procreative acts in ll a a a a L d a stories reg rding H w (in Hindust ni ust, Win ,

- d Cha ah Eve as A an v , A a a ir Juno) or or the r bs c ll it,

a a a . Ea was H yy t, life or cre tion ting forbidden fruit simply a figurative mode of expressing the performance of the act necessary for the perpetuation of t he human ” race. ’ The following curious passage from Cook s Firs t Voyage

ree k ( ur- e fi t.) me ans t o ant see ds and t o e ne rat e In G b pl g . ‘ ’ Riv ers o L e vol . i. 1 f i/ , , p. Cus t m o Paci c Islanders o f . 39

will show the reverence with which the procreative act was looked upon by a primitive race in the islands of the Pacific Ocean ; it was considered a religious duty On

' the 1 4th I directed that divine service should be per formed at the fort : we were desirous that some of the a a princip l Indi ns should be present, but when the hour Mr a a . c me, most of them returned home . B nks, how and a Tub ourai ever, crossed the river, brought b ck a a and a T m ide his wife Tonio, hoping th t it would give a a and in occ sion to some inquiries on their p rt, some

: a a a struction on ours h ving se ted them, he pl ced himself and between them, during the whole service they very a a and a ttentively observed his beh viour, very ex ctly imi t at e d a as saw it ; st nding, sitting, or kneeling, they him do ; they were conscious that we were employed about and a as a a b something serious import nt, ppe red y their ” calling to the Indians without the fort to be silent ; yet was e m a an when the service ov r, neither of the sked y a an a a was questions, nor would they ttend to y ttempt th t a a n a had m de to expl i wh t been done . Such were our matins our Indians thought fit to per

a ff . man a form vespers of di erent kind A young , ne r six f V a l feet high, per ormed the rites of enus with little gir , a ar a e a bout eleven or twelve ye s of g , before sever l of our and a a a as a people gre t number of the n tives ; but, p e are d a p , in perfect conformity to the custom of the pl ce . A mong the S pectators were several women of superior a a a O b ere a ma a r nk, p rticul rly , who y properly be s id to a a at a h ve ssisted the ceremony, for they g ve instruction ” ho w a to the girl to perform her p rt .

’ Cook s First V o a e Hawke swort h 1 2 8 . y g , , 4o The First Festiv al.

This account of the procreative ceremony among the Otaheitans has been further described by V oltaire in his

' Les Orei lles da Comt e de Cb est ei ield a story, j , with ddi t io nal a P O b e ira circumst nces The rincess , queen of a a a a a a the isl nd of Ot heite, fter h ving m de us m ny pre a a E a sents with politeness worthy of queen of ngl nd, was anxious to be present some morning at our English

a as as service . We celebr ted it with much ceremony ’ S he a was possible . invited us to her s fter dinner ; it on

1 Ma 1 6 the 4th of y, 7 9 . We found her surrounded by a a a a a bout thous nd persons of both sexes, r nged in semi

a nd . circle, in respectful silence A very pretty young was a a girl, slightly dressed, lying on r ised bench, which n a a O b e ira s erved as a lt r . The Q ueen ordered a hand man of a and a some young bout twenty to go s crifice . a a and a a a He uttered kind of pr yer, scended the lt r.

sacrificers a a . The two were h lf n ked The queen, with a a air a v m jestic , t ught the young ictim the most proper a a manner to consumm te the s crifice. All the Otaheitans a and a were so ttentive so respectful, th t none of our sailors dared to interrupt the ceremony by an indecent

a . what I a a l ugh This is h ve seen, it is for you to dr w ” inferences . “ T a a a a D r. his s cred festiv l does not stonish me, s id “ G a a a was a oodm n, I feel persu ded th t this the first festiv l

a me n a and th t ever celebr ted, I do not see why we should no t pray to G od when we are going to procreate a in a as a a being his im ge, we pr y before we t ke our w food, hich serves to support our body working to give a a a a and birth to re son ble being, is most noble holy action : as thus the first Indians thought who revered t he Lin am . a a the g , symbol of gener tion ; the ncient Plyases o t b e Phallus f .

Egyptians who carried the phallus in procession ; the G P a reeks who erected temples to ri pus . Three phases in the representation o f the phallus

w as o f should be distinguished ; first, when it the object v and w as re erence religious worship ; secondly, when it used as a protecting power against evil influences o f v ar1 o us d and as a a a a a kin s, ch rm or mulet g inst envy or the evil eye ; there are numerous instances o f its use for a a a a this purpose . It ppe rs on the lintel of postern g te ’ at a a a at P a at Al tri, in b ker s shop ompeii, on the w ll F a G a a iesole, on the w lls of rott Torre, on the w lls of

o f at Pa a at Ca Todi ; on the doors tombs l zzuolo, stel E a a a di Asro in truri . The ph llus lso frequently occurs on a a f E and o f mulets of porcel in ound in gypt, bronze in

a a k . It ly . These were usu lly worn round the nec The bust of a woman w as found at Pompeii with a necklace ’ o f a . I D Pom eii eight ph lli round her neck n yer s p , a a a a p . 4 47 , is figured neckl ce of mulets with two ph lli f P a a f found on a emale skeleton . h lli were lso requently a a a d a a a a pl ced in v iney rds n g rdens to sc re w y thieves . T w as and hirdly, when it the result of mere licentiousness a a dissolute mor ls . This ph se we need not further notice, as it is completely outside our purpose . Another cause also contributed to the reverence and frequent representations of t he phallus— the natural desire

a all a a a as as v d of women mong r ces, b rb rous well ci ilize ,

f o f — a as to be the fruit ul mother children especi lly , a a mong some people, women were esteemed ccording to and as a the number of children they bore ; , mong the

M a a da f oh mmed ns of the present y, it is sin ul not to a as a f o f contribute to the popul tion ; symbol , there ore, ro lificac and as o f ff a p y, the bestower o spring, the ph llus D B udd/91st Tem le at Pekin 4 2 p .

a an and a bec me object of reverence, especi l reverence a P was a mong women . At ompeu found gold ring,

a o f a a with the represent tion ph llus on its bezel , supposed a to have been worn by a barren woman . To propiti te and a ff ff the deity, to obt in o spring, o erings of this symbol a R a and were m de in om n temples by women, this custom

has a at a a N a . been ret ined in modern times Iserni , ne r ples S tone offerings of phalli are also made at the present day a P and a in Buddhist temple in ekin, for the s me object Mohammedan women kiss with reverence t he organ of an a a has generation of idiot or s int . In Indi this worship found its most extensive development . There young girls

are a a and a who nxious for husb nds, m rried women who are are a a desirous of progeny, rdent worshippers of Siv , and a a his symbol, the ling m, which is frequently wre thed a with flowers by his fem le worshippers, is exhibited in enormous proportions .

1 6 . F n F a In the th century St o tin in the south of r nce,

S t . at and a a Ters Antwerp, in the l st century S ints C and D a a at I a a N a wor osmo mi no serni , ne r ples, were shipped for the same purpose by young girls and barren

W ax a ff . a and women ph lli were o ered to these s ints,

a t a a a a and M r pl ced on heir lt r . Sir Willi m H milton . Payne Knight were led to investigate the origin of the

ceremony . The results of their inquiries left no doubt a w as a a P a th t it remn nt of the worship of ri pus, which appears to hav e lingered on this spot without interruption a a from p g n times . A P a was ccording to Henry Stephens, ri pus worshipped

at - D un a a Bourg , ne r Bourges . B rren women performed a nov ena there ; and on each of the nine days they a stretched themselves over the figure of the s int, which A M rac ulous D au /J i r g t . 4 3

was a a . T a a r pl ced horizont lly hey then scr ped, cco ding

D ulaure a a a a G ue rlicho n was to , cert in p rt of S int , which

as as a P a a a o ff prominent th t of ri pus ; wh t they scr ped , a a a a mixed with w ter, formed mir culous dr ught . Henry “ a I if a a Stephens dds, do not know the s int is in simil r at t he da av sa credit present y, for those who h e seen it y that for the last twelve years it has had that part worn ” a a a way from continu lly scr ping it . F a a a f e flicac In r nce, in the l st century, belie in the y o f a a a was a some s ints for simil r purpose ret ined . The following extract is from a work published in 1 7 97 A t P o f the further end of the ort Brest, beyond the f a was a a a and a ortific tions, there sm ll ch pel, in this ch pel a t a a If was a st tue honoured wi h the n me of s int . decency P a a permitted me to describe ri pus with his ttributes, I

a a . a o should depict th t st tue B rren women, or th se who a a and a a fe red to be so, went to this st tue, fter h ving

' a a dare no t and av d scr ped wh t I mention, h ing runk the a a o f a f a a powder infused in gl ss w ter rom fount in, they t a f ook their dep rture, with the hope of becoming ruit

ful .

M ast ure aux Dula re A . P u ccording to , quoted by ,

was at Chevriere a a a there Bourges, rue , sm ll st tue a a o f a a a pl ced in the w ll house, the sexu l org ns of which were worn away from being continually scraped by

a a a o ff hO e women, who sw llowed wh t they scr ped , in the p of becoming fruitful ; this statue is in the country named the good S aint G reluchon (le bon S aint Sir G ardner Wilkinson records similar superstitious at da at Ekhmim E . T beliefs the present y , in gypt he superstitions of the natives here ascribed the same pro ’ e rt ie s a and p to stone in one of the sheikh s tombs , like a s o 4 4 C v e f Elepb ant a .

a Pan a wise to th t of the temple of , which the st tues of

a n a Pano lis Ekh the god of gener tio , the p tron deity of p (

im f m av ) , were or erly believed to h e possessed ; the Ekhmim a and ua modern women of , with simil r hopes eq l r ff a c edulity, o er their vows to these relics for numerous progeny .

D r. S a C o f V has a incl ir oghill, now entnor, who tr velled

C a and a a has extensively in hin J p n, kindly contributed a the following, recording his experiences of simil r super st it ious beliefs and practices in Indi a and J ap an at the present day O n w a Far Ea 1 8 6 1 I had an my y out to the st, in , a a o f E a a opportunity of visiting the gre t c ve temple leph nt , a a a of a ne r Bomb y . In e ch the monolithic ch pels within a a a l a a the re of the m in temp e, I observed gig ntic stone

a ph llus projecting from the centre of the floor. The em

was a a blem in some c ses wre thed with flowers, while the floor was strewed with the faded Chaplets of the

a v at o f v f ir de otees, some of whom the time my isit,

a v u v f ncying themsel es nobser ed, were invoking the subtle influence of the stony charm by rubbing their pudenda a a a h a g inst its unsymp t etic surf ce, while muttering their a u a ma a as pr yers for conj g l love, or for tern l joy, the need might be . “ t wo a a a 1 8 6 In the course of visits I p id to J p n, in 4 and 1 8 6 was w in 9, I very much struck ith the extent to which this ancient symbolic worship had survi ved through ma a a a and was a a ny ph ses of r tion l religion, still ttr cting

s v a a numerous devotees to its shrine . I isited l rge temple devoted to this cultus in a small isl and o ff Ka ma a a and a a a a tur , the ncient now deserted c pit l of J p n, in Ba of Y a a F the y okoh m , some miles below the oreign

Ca t ain B urt on 4 6 p . vival has been made greatly to t he detriment o f the

a as a a Buddhist f ith, which, more recently imported liter ry C a a a a product from hin , held princip l sw y in the l rge

and am lit erat i. T P a cities, ong the he h llic cultus still prevailing in the remoter country districts is probably a surviving relic of an earlier phase of the S int o o religion a in which the ph llic element is still represented . In

a a an I a a a and a a tr velling in J p , h ve seen g in g in on the

Tokaido a a was , or public ro d, hedged recess, in which implanted on its pedestal a gigantic stone phallus of most unequivocal character The whole population of the country seem so habituated to the symbol as to regard it a a a a u p rt from its more m teri l or grosser s ggestion . I a a a a a h ve seen prodigious represent tion of the m le org n, a a modelled in colour, borne erect by priests on pl tform a N a a a at through the princip l streets of g s ki , without tracting anything but respectful notice from the seething crowd . ’ The following passage from Captain Burton s Dab omé exhibit s similar customs among a rude and barbarous people of the present day Among all barbarians a a a a whose prim l w nt is progeny, we observe gre ter or P a D a e less development of the h llic worship . In hom it a E is uncomfort bly prominent . very street from Whydah a a a and to the c pit l is dorned with the symbol, the old D a ones are not removed. The homan Pri apus is a clay an a a and a figure, of y size between gi nt pigmy, crouched as a a upon the ground, if contempl ting its own ttributes . T a a a he he d is sometimes wooden block rudely c rved,

and and are more often dried mud, the eyes teeth supplied a . T a by cowries he tree of life is nointed with p lm oil, w a a a and hich drops into pot or sh rd pl ced below it, the A S olemn Oat b . 47

would- b e mother o f children prays that the great god ” a a Legb will m ke her fertile .

M r n a a . . C . H H . Johnsto notes simil r worship in ongo

O n C as far as a P a the Lower ongo, St nley ool, ph llic

a a a a worship in v rious forms prev ils . It is not ssoci ted with any rites that might be called particul arly obscene ;

and a a and a are a on the co st, where m nners mor ls p rti c ularl a y corrupt, the ph llus cult is no longer met with . In the forests between M anyanga and Stanley Pool it is a a a not r re to come upon little rustic temple, m de of

a - and a and f a p lm fronds poles, within which m le em le a ma figures, ne rly or quite life size, y be seen, with dis a a a proportion te genit l org ns, the figures being intended a and f a l to represent the m le em le princip e . Around these carved and painted statues are many offerings of

a and and a a pl tes, knives cloth, frequently lso the ph llic ma a m af symbol y be seen d ngling fro the r ters . There is o f all and an not the slightest suspicion obscenity in this, y one qualifying this worship o f the generative power as a and a a obscene does so h stily ignor ntly . It is solemn C a a mystery to the ongo n tive, force but dimly under and all a a a f a stood, , like mysterious n tur l m ni est tions, it is a power that must be propitiated and persuaded to his

as as a a The reverence well worship p id to the ph llus,

a and a had n ar in e rly primitive d ys, nothi g in it which p took of indecency ; all ideas connected with it were o f a

v a and . A a a as re erenti l religious kind When br h m, G a a a a mentioned in enesis, in sking his serv nt to t ke a a him la a a solemn o th, m kes y his h nd on his p rts of “ generation (in the common version under his

if H H J ohnst on l e Riv er Con o . 0 . . . , g , p 4 5 8 Civ iliz atio an 4 n d Puri ty.

was a b e as a o f it th t required, token his sincerity, his placing his hand on the most rev ered p art of his body ; as at the present day a man would place his hand on his a d a he rt in or er to evince his sincerity . J cob, when dying, a f ac t a m kes his son Joseph per orm the same . A simil r custom is still retained among the Arabs at the present

da . A A a a a a a y n r b, in t king solemn o th, will pl ce his f a a a . h nd on his virile member, in ttest tion of sincerity The indecent ideas attached to the representation of a a a a sa the ph llus were, though it seems p r dox to y

o f a a a a so, the result more dv nced civiliz tion verging a as a at R and tow rds its decline, we h ve evidence ome

P 1 1 ' ompe . 1 ” a f as M a e We must c re ully distinguish, . B rr writes, a a a a and mong these ph llic represent tions, religious side, a a purely licentious side . These two cl sses correspond ff a ff with two di erent epochs of civiliz tion, with two di erent a a a ph ses of the hum n mind . The gener tive power pre sented itself first as worthy o f the adoration o f men ; it was symbolized in the organs in which it is centred ; and then no licentious idea was mingled with the worship of If a these sacred objects . this spirit of purity bec me

a as a a v as we ker civiliz tion bec me more de eloped, luxury

and v a av a a ices incre sed, it still must h e rem ined the peculi r attribute of some simple minds and hence we must con sider under this point of View all objects in which nudity S a a is veiled, so to pe k, under religious motive . Let us look upon those coarse representations with the same eye a u a a saw an with which the n tive pop l tion of L tium them, a and a and ignor nt rude popul tion, consequently still pure

’ M emoi es s u t r r l E J e art ie de ux ie me . 1 6. gy/ , p , p 9

” S ecret [Mus e um o N a /es L ondo n l 8 I . 1 f p , , 7 Cons t an and Volt ai t re . 4 9 and v and t av irtuous, even in the most polished mos depr ed times o f the Empire ; le t us Consider from this same point o f all a a o f o f a View those co rse st tues the god g rdens, those phalli and amulets ; and let us recall to our minds

a at da a a o f th t, even the present y, the simple pe s nts some parts o f Italy are not completely cured of such super

t it io ns s . Inthis connection we may introduce an extremelyjust and apposite remark of Constant in his work on Roman Poly “ t b eis m Indecent rites may be practised by a religious a a people with the gre test purity of he rt . But when has a a a incredulity g ined footing mongst these peoples, these rites become then the cause and pretext of ” a a h most revolting corruption . A simil r rem rk as b m a V a a P a de by olt ire . Spe king of the worship of ri pus,

‘ he says O ur ideas of propriety lead us- to suppose that a ceremony which appears to us infamous could only be invented by licentiousness but it is impossible to believe that licentiousness and depravity of manners would ever have led among any people to the establishment o f reli ma gio us ceremonies pro fligacy y have crept in in the a a w as a a ih l pse of time, but the origin l institution lw ys and a a a es nocent free from it the e rly g p , in which boys and a girls kissed one nother modestly on the mouth, de

a at a and gener ted l st into secret meetings licentiousness . I a a was t is, therefore, prob ble th t this custom first intro d in a was duce times of simplicity, th t the first thought to honour the Deity in the symbol o f life which it has ” ma V given us . In conclusion we y introduce the iews of

F D r. B Es sa on a recent rench writer, oudin, whose y

P/J allic Wars /sip is little known .

a a a D r. Modern histori ns h ve been str ngely deceived, in ’ 0 Dr Boudin s Conclusions . 5 .

’ n se e m 1 n P a Boudin s opinio , in persisting in g the ri pus o f a and a a a s mbol ntiquity, in the Ling m of Indi , only y of eneration M an a s mbols and a all g . does not dore y , lmost nations have adored Priapus ; thousands of virgins have sacrificed to Pri apus and the Lingam the most precious

and a are thing they possessed, such s crifices not surely ma a s mbol offered to symbols . As well y we tr nsform into y s a a the most obscure cts, of which the worship of the ph llus ” a af a . A is, in re lity, but the religious consecr tion nd ter citing numerous instances o f the worship of Pri apus and

a P a v the reverence p id to the h llus, he gi es the following as his conclusions on the subject of that worship ! “ of a a In presence the preceding f cts, which ttest one a of the most univers lly extended cults, or religious wor a can ships, wh t we think of the opinion which persists in seeing in the Priapus of antiquity and in the Lingam of ” India only a symbol and an outline of generation ! M an never attached the least importance to the phallus a a a a issuing from the h nd of the sculptor, ph llus ssuredly as as a a a symbolic consecr ted ph llus could be . To be a a the object of worship, the ph llus required previous a u P a and religious consecr tion, witho t which the ri pus the a a a S a Ling m were nothing but fr gment of tone, but piece

— inutile li num as R a a a of wood g , the om n poet, Hor ce, s ys . “ ” “ a Iamb lichus h In religione, s ys , non potest eri

O alicu us a e flicaciae a illic pus ullum j mir bilis , nisi dsit ” ali uis a O et im superiorum q spect tor peris plet or. A a a fter the consecr tion, the scene ch nged ; the wood, inut ile li num ca a D furum avium ue g , be me god eus inde, q

a fo rmido maxim .

a has a a ! Le t ask an a Wh t t ken pl ce us hum n ture, the

Fa C . a philosophers, the thers of the hurch All nswer Tb e Pb allus not a S mbol 1 y . 5

a a an a a o f D with one ccord, th t inc rn tion the eity has a a t ken pl ce in the wood or in the stone . This was the creed of antiquity ; this is what modern

a . O Indi still believes In the pinion of St . John Chry

so st o m a are : M60 1 Ka i. sa t oue g and S st tues a , stones pirits o f

o f S t . C a are evil . In the opinion ypri n, the spirits in the

“ stone or under the stone : Hi ergo Impuri Spiritus sub m i i d i e nt inut i s F st at uis e t i ag n b us e l t scu . M u elix ex f in a S a presses himsel somewh t imil r terms . According to

a a an was a a a Tertulli n, to m ke idol to m ke body for

De Idolat ria demon ( ) . Assuredly there is nothing in these quotations which authorise the interpretation of the present day considering as a A rnob ius them symbols . Let us lso cite , who, before had a a his conversion, been fervent dorer of these gods , and ought to be an authority on these forms of belief “ ” If I a a a a met, he s ys, stone nointed with oil (l pidem — un uine so rdidat um h a I ex olivi g t is is the consecr tion), a e I a a affab ar b eneficia o sce b am ddr ssed it, sked f vours ( , p ) as if it had been inhabited by a po vier (tanquam ine sse t a a a a vis a . I af pr esens) n nother pl ce the s me uthor, ter having accused his former c o - religionists of adoring statues, puts in their mouth this very legitimate o bj e c “ E a tion rror ; we dore neither the bronze, nor the

S a co nse gold, nor the ilver ; but those whom religious cration (de dicat io sacra) renders the indwellers of the stone (e flicit hab it are It is also in allusion to the general belief in the power of the consecration of the

dedicat io sacra a a a a stone, , th t Luci n, lw ys disposed to at an a a sneer y religious ide which he meets, excl ims,

E a i rd s Moo s cr c bei very stone renders or cles ( q p p ) , provided ” a it is nointed with holy oil . 5 2 Consecration.

“ “ a Minut ius F a a o d P How, s ys elix, do they m ke g a It is melted, it is struck, it is sculptured, it is not yet no ndum a a god ( est deus) , it is soldered, it is m nuf ctured, it is raised erect ; it is not yet a god (nondum est deus) ;

a it a consecrat ed a l stly, is dorned, it is , it is pr yed to, it is a man has and has a now god, when willed it, dedic ted it

o rnat ur c onse crat ur o rat ur ( , , , tunc postremo deus est, cum homo illum voluit e t “ ” “ a a D a a In Indi , s ys el fosse, the ling m issuing from the hands of the workman is deemed an instrument without virtue ; it acquires it only by c o nse crat io nw t hat

sa a a has and has is to y, when Br hmin blessed it, rendered ! ” incarnate in it the deity by religious ceremonies T a a a as a o sum up, the ph llus, in the s me m nner st tues ,

a a a a a was pl nts , nim ls, objects of worship mong n tions, a a only the outw rd covering, the recept cle, the vehicle of was a the deity which supposed to be cont ined within it, a a was a deity to which lone religious worship p id . This a a was a outw rd covering, this recept cle, this vehicle, v ried

an a was in infinity of modes with reg rd to its form, but it ’ an alle o r r neither a symbol nor g y .

’ The Dionysia (A t o mm a) were celebrated in honour

' ‘ a A LCSVUO O S . has of B cchus, The etymology of this word been the subject of long discussions . The older opinion

' Z eb A t o G o d and derived it from g, genitive g, Jupiter or ,

’ E s sai His t orique s ur l Inde . 1 O n m writ in t o a e arne d frie nd t o ask his O inio n o n t his ie w y g l p v , f o in re T he n i I re c e iv e d t he o ll w g ply a c e nt s wo rshippe d t he — — phallu s t he yo ni and t he Iinga b e c ause t he y worshippe d nat ure powe rs ’ In t hat se nse no do b t t he e re ‘ in ene ra . , u w re arde d as di ine g l , y g v , r t r e t hat t he re ard d t h m ‘ i b ut it is ha dly u y g e e as an ncarnat io n o f t he ’ de it y .

Vot aries o Baccb us 5 4 f .

a and a a a with go t skins, c rried the horns of nim ls ; they a and a a a rode on sses, dr gged fter them go ts intended to a be s crificed . In the town this frenzied crowd was fo l

d a a a o f lowe by priests c rrying s cred v ses, the first which was filled with water then followed young girls selected m a and a Ca from the ost distinguished f milies, c lled ne phori because they bore small baskets of all r a and a gold full of sorts of f uits, of c kes, of s lt ; but a a a C the princip l object mong these, ccording to St . roix, was a a o f a fi - the ph llus, m de of the wood g tree . (In the

flcb arnians a comedy of the , by Aristoph nes, one of the “ a a a a C a a ch r cters in the pl y s ys, ome forw rd little, Ca and Xanthias S a a a nephoros, you, , l ve, pl ce the ph llus f ’ e re ct

a e ri hallia we t ban ta a After these c me the p p ( p q ), troop of men who carried long poles with phalli hung at the e nd : and of them they were crowned with violets ivy, and as they walked they repeated - Ob S C€I1 € songs called

!o a hallo ho ri ! a unat !30 mm . These men were c lled p p these must not be confounded with the

a sol ri u m an and ithyph lli ( a ), who, in indecent dress , ’ S m a a a ometi es in wom n s dress, their he d covered with

a a a w and g rl nds, their h nds full of flo ers, pretending to be at a a a a drunk, wore their w istb nd monstrous ph lli m de of

a : a a a wood or le ther mong the ithyph lli , must lso be a Pan counted those who ssumed the costume of , or of the

S a . a licno ho ri tyrs There were other persons, c lled p

Kt xvd moc had a ( d p ), who the c re of the mystic winnowing fan an was , emblem the presence of which considered a was as indispensable in these kinds of festiv ls . It on licnit e account of this symbol that the epithet (xi xutrq g) was given to Bacchus . Inv ocat ions . 5 5

a Outside the town, the more respect ble persons, the a and a a f m trons modest virgins, sep r ted themselves rom

the procession . But the people, the countless multitude a and a a S a of Sileni, of S tyrs, of b cch ntes, pre d S a and a themselves over the open p ces the v lleys, stopped in solitary places to get up dances or to celebrate some

a a re - o f festiv l, m king the rocks with the sound and and a a drums flutes, more especi lly with cries const ntly “ a : Ev e repe ted, by which they invoked the god oh ” S ab se e e a Iacche a E ! Evoh B cche ! O ! Io B cche ! t a: ” Eli ot d e a. Ia K e as, aix e . x X , B x The first of these words recalls the words with which Jupiter encouraged a w ar a a B cchus when, in the of the gi nts, the l tter “ ! ” f o f a 5 5 v s a) we Bé x e de ended the throne his f ther , x , called out the master of the gods : they added also c a, - ting iii mg drrng fine. The description we have given was chiefly applied to a D a p e dha D a the gre ter ionysi ( y ) , or to the new ionysi i S ix a a ( V e crrepa) ; there were other festiv ls of this n me, the ceremonies o f which must have borne some resem a a a a bl nce to th t lre dy described . There were, in the

a a D a fi t drs a first pl ce, the ncient ionysi ( pxa p ), which were

a at Limnae and a a celebr ted , in which ppe red fourteen

’ a G e rae rae I é a t a t a b e priestesses c lled ( p p , vener ble) who, on a fore entering their duties, swore th t they were pure and a D a t x d ch ste . There were the lesser ionysi (M p ) , a a and which were celebr ted in the utumn, in the

a a B ama Brauro n a a country ; the Br uroni ( pa vp ) of , vill ge

a N ct e lia v ht a of Attic ; the y ( v xr fi ) , the mysteries of which it was forbidden to reveal ; the The o ina (aéo w a )

Le ne an k vai va - the ( a a), festi ls of the wine press the Omophagia (snag/sw at ) in honour of Bacchus car 6 Tb e z i e o Fes tiv als 5 g f .

nivorous to whom formerly human victims

ff and at e raw a were o ered, whose priests me t ; the Arcadian which ! were celebrated in Arcadia

a a and a T a T t e r t k d by dr m tic contests l stly the rieteric ( p np ), which were celebrated every three years in memory of the period during which B acchus made his expedition in a Indi . The Bacchic mysteries and orgies are said to have been S out hein a E a and f introduced from It ly into truri , rom R O a a d thence to ome . rigin lly they were only celebr te

a a a and by women, but fterw rds men were dmitted, their a f a presence led to the gre test disorders . In these estiv ls a a a a and w as the ph llus pl yed prominent p rt, publicly ex

hib it e d. Lavinium a a a At the festiv l l sted month, during a a a a was which time ph llus, rem rk ble for its proportions, a a da a lan c rried e ch y through the streets . The co rsest guage w as heard on all S ides ; a matron o f one of the most considerable families in the town placed a wreath a on this obscene im ge . Pa a A a act a cul nni , pretending to under the inspir t a a a a a a ion of B cchus, ordered th t the B cch n li should be was held during five days in every month . It from the time that these orgies were carried on after this new

a a a S a an - pl n th t, ccording to the t tement of eye witness

and de scri (Liv . xxxix . licentiousness crimes of every p tion were committed . This was carried to such an excess that the Senate in 1 8 6 issued a decree to suppress and prohibit these festivals ; it was ordered t hat no Bacchanali a S R a hould be held in ome or in It ly . a a a Our t sk is now ended . We h ve tr ced the spon t aneous and independent development in many countries Co c n lusion. 5 7

o f a man the worship, the reverence p id by to the gene

rat ive o a r f a p wer, th t rep oductive orce which perv des all a To v man was n ture. the primiti e it the most

mysterious of all manifestations . The visible physical a — — a powers of n ture the sun, the sky, the storm n tu

a a a v r lly cl imed his reverence, but to him the gener ti e was all power the most mysterious of powers . In the a a veget ble world, the live seed pl ced in the ground, and a S and a hence germin ting, prouting up, becoming

a and a was a . be utiful umbr geous tree, mystery In the a a as a all f all nim l world, the c use of li e, by which beings a was a c me into existence, this power mystery . In the view of primitive man generation was the action of the Deity was all h itself. It the mode in which He brought t ings a into existence, the sun, the moon, the st rs, the world, man a were gener ted by Him . To the productive power man was b a deeply inde ted, for to it he owed the h rvests and the flocks which supported his life hence it naturally a an and bec me object of reverence worship . P man a an rimitive w nts some object to worship, for a a a a bstr ct ide is beyond his comprehension, hence

a a v D was a visible represent tion of the gener ti e eity m de, with the organs contributing to generation most promi and a a a nent, hence the org n itself bec me symbol of the w po er. As this power was visible through all nature and in all a a man and countries, simil r ide s were suggested to , reverential worship to it became wide e spread among many a and a n tions r ces . 5 8 The Ev il Eye .

YE T HE E V IL E ,

A N D IT S CO N N ECT IO N W IT H PH A LLIC TLLU S T R A T IO N .

I TH E belief in the Evil Eye is one o f the most widely extended o f superstitions ; it crops out in the remotest

o f a n a corners the globe . It is found mong the i tellectu l G reeks and the cultivated Romans of the Augustan age as a ava mong the rudest s ges . If the universality o f a belief were an argument for its a E truth, the doctrine which sserts the power of the vil E e a all a y would be bove controversy . Tr nsmitted by u a a all a a ncounted gener tions, perh ps, to the n tion lities of a a at a the globe, the theory of f scin tion, which lies the b sis all a a a a a of witchcr ft, holds pl ce mong the very first ide s a a formul ted by m nkind . It takes its origin from that common but unamiable a na an a feeling in hum n ture, when invidious gl nce or look o f envy is cast on the happier lot or on the superior , a ff possessions of others . To vert the supposed e ects of a E E e had t o this gl nce of envy, this vil y , recourse is the superstitious practice of using some attractive object or a ma a a f a E E e t lis n to turn side the b ne ul d rt of the vil y .

“ ’ ” a inv idia as C. M iille r The dre ded , O . writes, a f a was ccording to the belie of ntiquity, with so much at a a o ff na the gre er cert inty w rded the more repulsive, y, a and disgusting, the object worn for th t purpose ; the P a a a a numberless h llic im ges, lthough origin lly symbols of

- a a had af a life cre ting n ture, terw rds, however, only this ” a and aim me ning . 3“ flncient A rt a e 6 2 , p g 7 . Tb e Ev il E e y . 5 9

A like stage o f mental progress will lead to the mani fe st at io n a a a ofsimil r beliefs , ofsuperstitions lmost identic lly a a a a and the s me . The ment l st ge being low, the ide s beliefs emanating from it will necessarily be rude and

a a - a a a o ff co rse. Simil r counter gents lso occur to w rd a f an the effects of a gl nce of envy rom evil eye . The met hods adopted for obviating its effects are o f course a merely the offspring of fear acting on ignor nce.

Many proofs may be adduced o f the. existence o f this and S a a t o a e ff belief, of imil r me ns v rt the e ects of the E E e a a G and R a vil y , not only mong the ncient reeks om ns, a t E a f a and a but lso throughou urope, Asi , A ric , Americ a t the present day. a all C a It is wide spre d over the world, from hin to

’ P G da a t he eru . The reek of the present y entert ins same horror of the b al m- mat s as his ancestors did o f the

ria n a/ 0 9 dc da h ds and mal occbio I a B p p , the of modern t ly is the

a a as cinat io R a a a o f tr dition l f of the om ns . The inh bit nts M a a a and n T and A a a l b r the Hi doos, like the urks r bi ns, apologise fo r the possession ofjewels with which they deco rate their children on the plea that they are intended t o draw aside the Evil Eye ; the M ahometans suspend objects f o f a a fo r a rom the ceilings their p rtments the s me purpose, and the object of the Singalese in placing those whitened chatties on their gables is to div ert the mysterious a at influence from their dwellings . Amongst the T mils J afferabad the same belief prevails as amongst the Irish and S a a are a cotch, th t their c ttle li ble to injury from the an a blight of evil eye, thus rec lling the expression of ’ “ V S N irgil s hepherd, escio quis teneros oculus mihi ” fasc inat a gnos . Whole populations have been said to be endowed with 6 0 Tb e Ev i E l ye. the power of the Evil Eye among the ancients the T Trib alli T a I a and elchines, the , the heb ns, the llyri ns, all a a / at t ri the Thr ci n women . Among the moderns it is C a C a buted by the hristi ns to the Turks ; to the hristi ns, Ca G A a T whether tholics, reeks, or rmeni ns, by the urks S S chut es and to the unnites by the , to the Shiites by the “ ” S E E e unnites . In the mouth of the orthodox vil y a a a a infide ls as is term of buse g inst , possessed such by S C a and M a t unclean pirits . hristi n oslem gree to endow wi h G and and it the ipsies the Jews, sometimes the Hindoos . D e Farra narrates that at M arcati there are such sorcerers that they e at the inside of anybody only by fixing their eyes upon him . In the country of Sennaar and ' Fa a va a ssold they h ve ri ls not less powerful, who by a n b a d mere look of their evil eye ( i el . fri ) stop the blood a and a a in the he rt the rteries of their enemy, desecr te his

a . S a a a a entr ils, unsettle his intellect The rdini ns h ve “ ’ saying amongst themselves : Dee s i guardi d occb io di ” lit t erat o ( M ay the Lord preserve you from being looked a man a are by of letters) , for the ilments they inflict a much worse th n those inflicted b y other people. The Romans attributed the Evil Eye to the l ate X A n a a was R I . I Pius t li n countess turned out of ome, as she was seen making the S ign against the Evil Eye he P was a when t ope giving his blessing . An musing

S a a w a a at tory is lso told of the l te Pope, hen s ying pr yers the audience at the V atican ; on coming to the pass age in ’ “ ” P a L a a the Lord s r yer, e d us not into tempt tion, he a a a looked over tow rds very ugly old l dy, upon which a a a D t he the l dy boldly repe ted loud, eliver us from ” L b a a alo- occbio Evil Eye ( i er nos m ) . r a a Z a a E a s M . B rh m incke tells us th t mong the gypti n

6 2 Tb e Ev il E ye.

S a a a a was as a t he pe king, cor l orn ment , it is now, mong a a f vourite verters of this evil influence. The Thebans about were supposed to have an hereditary claim t o a a and - u this ch rming ttribute, could even kill grown p me n w a a a a ith gl nce . As for Afric , where the belief lso a a still exists, cert in f milies could not only destroy children, w but ither up trees ; but they did not with curses, but malus oculus was a wa ff praises . The not l ys di erent from

But a f the eyes of other people . persons, especi lly o the fa a a v irer sex, with double pupils to the org n, were bo e and a a all to be shunned dre ded . The Illyri ns were s aid a a f all to possess this f t l de ormity . In countries, even in N t has l a the or h, the eye ever been he d the chief se t of fascination ; but nowadays ladies with a S ingle pupil

a a t he u a S o , m n ge work of destr ction pretty e sily. much ” do we improve upon our forefathers I “ Mr a t he a a . Bonwick tells us th t red h nd, st mped on a da A a Pa as a a w lls to this y by the r bs in lestine, ch rm a a E E e a and g inst the vil y , is recognised not only in Indi ” A a a A a a and a a a meric but lso in ustr li T sm ni . One of the objects most generally used to av ert the E E e E G and a was re re vil y in gypt, reece, It ly the p i n a E a m se nt at o of the ph llus . In gypt in ncient ti e it N was extensiv ely used . umbers of examples have been a a at Bub ast is t he found, p rticul rly , belonging to twenty

a a 60 0 B C . S second dyn sty, bout . ome represent beings with a phallus of abnormal proportions ; others are re a a mark ble for their gross indecency . One of the e rliest of kno wn examples of representations of the phall us as an amulet against the evil is on the lintel of a gateway on the ancient walls of Alatri : three phalli are represented as a a joined together so to form cross . The ph llus occurs Tb c Ev il E e 6 y . 3 a a a at Fie so li o lso for the s me purpose on the w ll , n the a G a at w lls of rott Torre, of Todi, on the doors of tombs

Pa a at Ca A E a. For a a l zzuolo, stel di sro in truri simil r reason the phallus was placed over the doors of G reek

’ and R a and om n houses, in the inside of the houses, to

v a - b a di ert the thoughts of p ssers y, so th t they might not an o f look with eye envy on the house . In the principle t P u o f a s reet of ompe it occurs over the door house, ’ and a a a . a lso in b ker s shop Bronze represent tions, of the a are ph llus, either erect or quiescent, frequently found in

I a . T are a f a the South of t ly hey lso o ten found, mong n a a other objects, in the eckl ces of l dies .

I N D E X .

A E d s ri t i n o f h 2 6 o r r BIGH GAM e c o t e , o , De o n A me ric an Ph i , p B u b u g , all c A raham Pha ic oat h e xac t ed 7 worshi b , ll by, 4 p , 33 A s sinians t he worshi ers of t he rahma 1 1 by , , pp B , 4, 5 Pha us 2 ra ronia t he ll , 4 B u , , 5 5 A c harnians t he ot at ion rom 0 B ub ast is Pha ic t a is man 6 , , q u f , 3 , , ll l s at , 2 ddhis t re i ion in J a an 5 4 u l g , t he B p , 45 Adam, 38 A rica t he E i E e in 6 2 C N E H OR t he 0 f , v l y , A P , 3 , 5 4 A ni 1 Cas t e di A re Pha ic i g , 4 l , ll t al smans at 6 , 3 A han 1 Ce res 8 k , 4 , 3 A at ri Phal ic t a is man at 6 2 Cha ons Co nc i o f for i l , l l , l , u l , b ds e nchant A me n Pha ic o ffe rin s t o 2 me nt s e r t a - , ll g , 3 b fo e he s c inam f , 3 5 A me rica Ce nt ra re i io s c re e ds of Chi i Pha ic worshi in 2 , l, l g u , l , ll , p 3 , 33 2 0 2 1 2 China re i io s e ie of 1 6 , , 3 , l g u b l f , A me rica N orth Pha ic ot arie s in Co ncha V e neris t he 1 , , ll v , , , 3 Co n o t he Pha ic wo rs hi o n 34 g , , ll , 47 ' p Y A nmio n It h ha ic 1 oo/c s Fi rs V a p ll , 3 t o e . uo t e d S y y g q , 3 A nat u 1 -6 Co an mono it hic i ars at , p , l p ll , 33 A n h or Tau t he 2 2 Coromande Coas t Phal ic s m k , , , l , l y bol s A nt we r Tem e of Pria us at ound o n t he 2 6 p , pl p , 37 f , A nn 1 6 Cos mo and Damiano S S wo r hi , . s ppe d A rd - li anci ris ci 1 arren wo men 2 , 5 by b , 4 A sht ar o r As ht er 1 Co wrie s a t a is man a ains t t he E i , , 7 , l g v l A s ht ar- Che mosh me anin of 1 E e 6 1 , g , 7 y , A s s rians e ie of t he 1 Cro nos 1 y , b l f , 7 , 7 A s t art e 1 Crux A ns a 62 , 7 t a, t he, At he ns t he w orshi o f Pria s ih C z co mo no ith at , p pu u , l , 33 t ro duc e d int o 1 8 C e e 1 , yb l , 3 ri s 1 S t . A u s t ine o n s e x ua t e C e ne it h ha ic s t at e f M gu l , 7 yll , yp ll u s o e r A us t ra ia Pha ic wo rs hi in . c r at 1 l , ll p , 34 u y , 9

AL- PE OR Pha ic re resent at ion o f DA H O M EE Pha ic worshi in 6 BA , ll p , , ll p , 4 2 De t a t he 2 1 4 l , , 2 , 3 a on Pha ic worshi re a ent De miur s t he 1 B byl , ll p p v l gu , , 3 a 2 2 Deva- N ichi me anin of t , , g , 5 3 a n n m tho o t he 1 6 Diodorus ic ulu bylo ia y l y , , S s on t he ac c hic rites B g B , ac c hus or O s e st i a of 2 2 B , f v l , 3 9 wo rs hi o f 2 Dion s os deri at io n of 2 p , 9 y , v , 5 , 5 3 acc hic Fe st i a s ac c o nt of t he Dio n siaca t he 0 2 B v l , u y , , 3 , 5 , 5 5 ario us ic ent ious o s er ance D aus 1 v , 5 5 l b v y , 5 f 6 o , 5 ar e Corn t he 1 E RT marria e of t he 1 1 1 1 l y , , 3 , , 2 , B A H g , 7

B a an e do c t . Fout in in 6 Edut h t he 2 s L gu , S , 3 , , 4 B e l 1 E t Pha ic worshi in 2 2 2 , 7 gyp , ll p , , 3 Lin a worshi at 2 6 2 Mode rn t he E i E e nares, , , 7 ) e in 6 1 B g p ( v l y , 2 6 2 E khm m e n a Lin a t em es i n 7 i , Pha ic wors hi at B g l , g pl , , ll p , 43 ha a 1 E e hant a Pha ic s m o s at 2 6 B v . 5 l p , ll y b l , ; ha ani 1 wors hi aid t o a Pha us at B v , 5 _ p p ll , 44

orne o Pha ic fi re s in 3 E e sis, m s t e rie s o f Pha ic 0 B , ll gu , 4 l u y , ll , 3 66 Index .

E ora Pha i s m o s at 2 6 Hiero olis enormo s Pha s at 2 ll , ll c y b l , p , u llu , 4 2 Em r n Pria s fo nd at 6 Hindoos t he s ex worshi ers , 4 b u , pu u , 3 , , pp Enchant ment s e ore t he as cia/u n H is t or t b e I nc as ot e d b f f m i y of , qu , 33 Mode rn E ro e Hond ras ido at u p , 35 u , l , 33 E ro e Modern Pha ic worshi in Hori anes t he S anish Pria s 2 u p ( ) , ll p , , p pu , 3 Hor s It h ha l ic 1 34 u yp l , 3

E ut ro ius S t . Pria s fo nd in t he H erion 1 p , pu u yp , 7 Ch rch of u , 36 IAM B LI H US ot ed 1 0 Ev C , qu , 3 , 5 a or He ia 8 v , 3 Ia e t s 1 - u , 7 E i E e t he a wide s read s er p v l y , , ly p up I rians aid o ha e t he E i E e lly , s t l y , st it ion 8 ori in of 8 means t a en v v , 5 g , 5 ; k 60 62 t o a ert 8 e ie in re a ent at , v , 5 b l f p v l Incarnat ion of t he De it y in an image t he resent da who e o ul a p y , 5 9 ; l p p ff o rat ion 1 e e ct e d by c nse c , 5 t ions said t o osse s s t he ower of p p , India P al i r hi in 2 2 re i 0 , h l c wo s p , ; l 6 a t e rmo a s 60 a ri d t o f bu e , t t but e ions ha it s in 2 2 b , Pi s IX . 60 e ie e d in M odern g u , b l v by Inv idia t he 8 E t ians 6 1 re ca t ions t a en , , 5 gyp , ; p u k Isis t h re c t i e deit 1 re re , e e y, 3 ; p a ainst in N ia 6 1 a e ie in p v g ub , ; b l f sent ed t he De t a 2 2 by l , s t i re a ent in Ma na Grfe cia ll p v l g , It h ha ic re re s ent at ions 2 6 1 coral ornament s t he u s ual yp ll p , 4 Ith hal i t he 2 yp l , , 9, 5 4 t a isman a ainst 6 in Africa l g , 2 ; , 6 2 ; t he Red Hand a universal A CO Pha ic oath e x act ed 8 J , ll by, 4 t a isman a ainst 62 B l , g an amas t he de ot e es o f t he in a J g , , v l g , 7-7 FAM AGOS TAJ ) t h rs ma e 0 , e fi t l , 2 a an Phalli worshi in 6 J p , p p , 45 , 4 F as c inam t he , , 35 a anese Cree d t he 1 p , , 9 , 44, 45 Fiesoli Pha ic t a is man at 6 J , ll l , 3 w t he worshi ers of t he Pha s e s , , pp llu , i 1 F , t he 3 J g , 2 ' 4 Font in S t . worshi ed b arren , , pp y b uno 1 , 7 women - 2 , 4 J i r 1 0 up t e , 7, 3 Fout in and Fout ine sed as names 6 J u , 3 Fric co t he German Pria s 2 , pu , 3 KAMATURA Pha i c t e m e at , ll pl , 44 Khem t he a s t ract idea o f at he r 1 2 , b f , A N GE S t he Lin a worshi re G , , p t h ha i 1 resided o er e ne g p I c yp ll , 3 p v g a e nt t hro ho t t he t ract of 2 6 l ug u , rat i n 8 v o , 3 e ne rat ion c ons ide red rimit i G , by p e isar 1 6 v K , man as t he ac t ion of t he Deit y , 5 7 Kiu- S iu t he is and of in the a anes e , l , p i J Gene rat i e worsh p in t he Pacific m h 2 0 t o o v y l gy , Is ands 0 l , 39, 4 K rit a Tat wa t he ot at ion rom 1 . y , , q u f , 4 Ge ne sis t he oo of cit ed 1 2 , , , Kt e is h 2 1 1 2 worshi ed in B k t e , , , 3 ; , 3 pp G e rman worshi of Pria s in y , p pu , 34, n m 2 Gree ce a d Ro e, 9 Ghe 1 , 7 r c harac t er of Pria s in 1 8 L AH IN A and Lahama 1 6 G e e c e, pu , , Gre ek s and l Romans re i io s ideas Lavinium Pha ic fest i a at 1 6 , l g u , ll v l , 3 , 5 of 1 Le a t he Dahoman Pria s , 7 gb , pu , 47 G rot t a Torre Pha ic t a ismans at 6 Lenae a t he , ll l , 3 , , 5 5

S t . G uerlichon de ot ions t o 4 Li er t he sex a or an of man c o se , v , 3 b , u l g u c rat e d in t he t em e of 1 pl , 7 H 8 Li e ria t he s e x a o r an of woman AWA, 3 b , u l g Ha t i Pha ic worshi in 2 c o ns e c rat e d in t he t e m e of 1 y , ll p , 3 , 33 pl , 7 H enr IIL ot at ion rom t he diar Lie nit e an e it het of ac ch s y , q u f y , p B u , 5 4 of 6 Lic no hori t he 4 , 3 p , , 5 H e rmes or Pria i ac ed at t he me et Lin a t he 2 1 2 0 a chr so er p , pl g , , , 4, 5 ; y b yl in of ro ads 1 8 in a desc ri e d t he e m le m of g , l g b , 2 5 b s ia s e r s nt d as a 1 8 S i a 2 ma ri w r He rme , Pr r e e e , , 5 t e a o f 2 o n pu p v l , 7 He rodo t s de s c ri t io n o f an E t ian round t he ne c 2 not a me r u , p gyp k , 7 ; e e s t i a b 2 2 on ac c hic rit e s 2 s m ol 0 t he cons e cratio n o f 2 f v l y , ; B , 9 y b , 5 ; , 5 Index .

Lin a worshi e xt ent of in India Par at i 1 1 6 g p , , v , 5 , 2 6 descri t ion of 2 8 Pe in o ffe rin s of Phal i at 2 ; p , k , g l , 4 Lin a et s 2 Pers ians t he worshi ed t he Pha s g y , 7 , , pp llu , Lin awan s 2 g t , 2 7 4 L c ian on t he co nse crat ion of ima es Per Pha ic worshi in 2 u g , u, ll p , 3 , 33

! Pi s IX . said t o oss ess t he E i E e 5 u , p v l y , 60

MAN t he name of t he in a 2 8 Pha s t he t he e x onent of creat i e I , , l g , llu , , p v Mans t he Ch rch of on e nchant ment s owe r 2 1 an e normo s i t ha us , u , p , u g l p ll , e fore t he as c inam 2 e sot eric me anin of on t om s b f , 35 3 ; g b , Marianne Is and t he a Pha ic ro 2 at Hiero olis 2 manufac l s, , ll p 3 ; p , 4 ; c ession in t ure d ews 2 worshi ed in , 34 by J , 4 ; pp Ma t t he a st ract ide a of mother 1 2 Gree ce and at Rome a s m u , b , , 2 9 y bo l Ma o e t he of Pha ic ori in in t he Dion siac roces sions 0 yp l , , ll g , 37 y p , 3 ; Me am s ro ht t he ac chic rit e meanin of re ea ed in t he m l pu , b ug B g v l ys int o Gre e ce 2 t erie s 0 s e c imen o nd at Tro , 9, 5 3 , 3 ; p f u y, Mendis t he worshi of Isis and Osiris 0 c arried in t he Roman est i a of , p 3 ; f v l at 1 V en s 0 worshi e d in t he s rin , 3 u , 3 ; pp p g, Merc r it h ha ic st at es of 1 1 de scri t ion of a s e c ime n in u y, yp ll u , 9 3 p p Mex icans Pha ic worshi amon t he t he os se ssion of Dr. Ramsa , ll p g , p y, 34 ; 2 2 2 as an amu et 1 t he est owe r , 3 l , 4 ; b of Minut ius Fe ix on t he c onsecrat ion offs rin 1 o nd at Pom e ii 2 l p g, 4 ; f u p , 4 ; of ima e s 1 2 offerin s of made arren women g , 5 , 5 g byb , Mit hras 2 0 2 waxen Pha i offere d t o saint , 4 ; ll s, Moa i S t o n he 1 2 inde ent id a a a b t e e, t , 7 4 c e s t t ched t o t he Mohammedan Con e st t he it s e ffect s res t of ad ance d c i i isat ion 8 qu , , ul v v l , 4 on Lin a worshi 2 7 a t a is man a ainst t he E i E e 62 g p , l g v l y , M t in s 1 8 t he Roman Pria s Phall o hori t he 2 u u , 3 , 3 ; pu , p , , 9, 5 4 l Pha ic disco erie s in America 9 ll v , 34 M it t a re resent e d t he rod c t i e Pha ic res in N ew Z ea and and yl , p p u v ll figu l rinci e o f nat re in t he A ss rian orneo at Ant wer at p pl u y B , 34 p, 37 ; m t ho o 1 A at ri 62 at Pom eii 6 s d y l gy , 7 l , ; p , 3 ; u e for wardin off t he E il E e 8 6 g v y , 5 , 3 N A GAS KI Pha l ic rocess ion in 6 Pha ic oat hs exact ed A raham A , l p , 4 ll , by b , 6 8 N a e s t he E i E e in, 1 4 and aco , co mmon at pl , v l y 7 by J b 4 is sa or Leb rixa Pha ic rit e s at t he re sent da amon t h N e b r , ll , 32 p e A rabs y g , N e aul worshi of S i a in 2 3 p , p v , 9 4 N e w Z ea and Pha ic ure s in 4. Pha ic roce ssion at t he Marianne l , ll fig , 3 ll p

N u ia re ca t ions t a e n a ainst t he Is ands at S aint e s S t . e an b , p u k g l , 34 ; , ’ J E i E e in 6 1 d A n el and Trani at N a a v l y , g y, , 37 g N ct elia t he sa i 6 y , , 5 5 k , 4 Pha ic Worshi ant i it o f 1 0 ll p, qu y , ; O M O HA G t he arious hases of 1 in S ain 2 P IA, , 5 5 v p , 4 p , 3

O r ie s t he ac c o nt of 4, in S a onia 4 in t he Paci c g , , u , 5 3, 5 5 5 l v , 3 fi rom E r r an s in a an int rod c e d int o Rome t ia Is d 39 ; , 5 in Da u f u , l , J p 4 homé 6 o n t he Con o V l 5 6 , 4 ; g , 47 ; o erat in ca e 1 aire ot ed on ro r O siris , t he en s t u , 49 ess o f, g g u , 3 q p g 1 reason of O uranos, 7 49 ; , 5 7 Phoenic ian M t ho o t he 1 y l gy, , 7 P C F C Is ands t he re i io s e ie Phi ae worshi of Isis and Os iris at A I I l , , l g u b l f l , p , 2 0 1 o f, 3 a nnia 6 Phr ia 1 Pac ul A , 5 yg , 3 az z o o Pha ic t a isman at 6 P at o ot at ion rom 1 2 Pal u l , ll l , 3 l , q u f , ian 2 P ut arc h on t he E t ian e ie 1 Pame ia t he E t , l , gy b l f, 3 l , gyp 3 p n r i n 8 o n t he Dion siaca 2 Pan re side d o e r e e at o , 3 y , 9 , p v g 8 Panuc o Pha ic s m o s at Po m e ii aint in s at , 1 t a is mans . ll y b l , 33 p , p g ; l 2 0 a ainst t he E i E e in 6 1 6 Pa a N e w Z e a and deit , l y , , 3 p , l y g v 68 Index .

Posi n . i f 6 S r a 1 g y, S t Fout n o , 3 u y , 4 Pra rit i t he e ma e rinci e 1 S ria re rese t at ion of aa - Poor in k , f l p pl , 4 y , p n B l , Pria s 1 t he charact e r of 1 8 2 pu , 3 ; , 4 o fe rin s t o 1 re r s nt at ion of f g , 9 ; p e e , 1 worshi ed in German 2 TA E N HAN N U Pha ic oa es 2 9 pp y, 3 , 34 , ll l v , 3 Mex ican des c ri t ion of a 2 re Tahit ians t he e ief of 2 0 , p , 3 ; p , , b l , Ta n a 2 6 sided o e r enerat ion 8 ; wor , t he , s a a Li , v g , 3 ly u u lly g ' shi e d at o r - Dun 2 at Tan ore Pha ic s m o s at 2 6 pp B u g , 4 j , ll y b l , o r h Tasmania Pha ic worshi in e s, descri t ion of a 43 ; t e , ll , 34 B u g p , p Dahoman 6 not a mere s m o Te chines t he said t o ha e t he E i , 4 ; y b l , l , , v v l 0 r t i n 0 a. E e 60 5 ; equire d consecra o , 5 ; y , ” re ce t ac e of t he Deit 2 Tenesse e Pha ic ima e s dis c o ere d p l y, 5 , ll g v Pri e - Ga a t he S a onian Pria s in p l , l v pu , , 34

Ters S t . worshi e d arren 34. 35 , , pp by b Pt ah It h ha ic 1 women 2 yp ll , 3 , 4 P r sha t he enerati e rinci le 1 Tert ian on t he M st e ries of E e s is u u , g v p p , 4 ull , y l u , 0 D l f a 3 : e Ido a ri , 5 7 RAN G I a N e w Z ea and deit 2 0 The ans t he said t o ha e t he E i , l y, b , , v v l Red Hand t lie a ni e rsa t a is man E e 60 6 2 , , u v l l y , , a ainst t he E i E e 62 The oina t he g v l y , , , 5 5 Ri V e da t he 1 Thesmo horia t he 2 g , , 5 p , , 3 Rome Phal ic worshi at 2 fes Ti et c rio s ra er sed in 2 8 , l p , 9 b , u u p y u , ” t ival in hono r of V enus at 0 Tim o a anese t e rm for a Pha ic u , 3 b , J p ll t em e pl , 45 S ace rdo t a l J ud me nt s n Crimes Tinas t he name of t he Pha s in t he g o , , , llu ot at ion from Pac i c Is ands q u , 35 fi l , 34 _ aie a Parana t h ot at ion rom Tlas c ala Pha ic s m o s at S , e, qu f , , ll y b l , 33 1 Todi Pha ic t a is mans at 62 4 , ll l , S a t i t he 1 t he fema e creati e To rs Ch rch of on e nchant ment s k , , 4 ; l v u , u , c a acit 1 e ore t he fasc inum p y , 5 b f , 35 S a t i Parvat i 1 Triads t he E t ian 1 4 k , 5 , gyp , S a s et t e Pha lic s m o s o nd in 2 6 Triaz o lt e nt i t he Mexican od o f l , l y b l f u , , g S ama V e da t he ot at ion rom 1 enerat ion 8 , , q u f , 5 g , 3 S ar and S arrat 1 Trib alli t he s aid t o ha e the E i , 7 , , v v l S ardinians t he a ro er of 60 E e 60 , , p v b , y , S e naar t he E i E e in 60 Trie t erica t he 6 , v l y , , , 5 e at acchana n S n us Cons ult am D e B Tut i us, 3 1 libus he 6 , t , 5 ” S e en Pa odas Pha ic s m o s U S A t em e of Fric co at 2 v g , ll y b l P AL , pl , 3 fo nd at 2 6 u ,

S e x Wo shi ant i it of 1 0 V ARAILLE S S t . Font in of 6 r p, qu y , , , 3 ha a 1 V e n s Fe s t iv a of S l , 7 u , l , 30

- S hamas t he A ss rian sun od V erdre S t . Fout in of 6 , y g , 1 7 , , 3

S i m- Kin t he 1 6 V ir i ot at ion rom on t he worshi g, , g l , qu f p S int o re i ion t he 6 of Pria us 1 o l g , , 4 p , 9 ” S ist r m t he 2 2 V is wes wara t he Lord f all a u , , , o , S i a 1 1 t he in a and om c om Lin a 2 v , 4, 5 l g y g , 7 inod a s m o of 2 t he de ot ee s V ul ord of fec ndit 1 8 b y b l , 5 ; v , l u y, 7, 3 of inscri e a in a on t heir ore V a t he 1 b l g f ulv , , 3 heads 2 6 worshi o f e er whe re , ; p v y Pha ic 2 6 2 re s ided o e r e ne WH D Pha ic s m o s in 6 ll , , 7 ; p v g Y AH, ll y b l , 4 i n 8 o n ir s and marri rat o , 3 y u g g l ed wo me n ot arie s o f 2 YO N t he 2 1 2 2 v , 4 I , , , 5 , 5 S a onia Pha ic worshi in Y c at an Pha s at 2 l v , ll p , 34 u , llu , 3 at h ido of 2 S o mn , l , 7 ai Pha ic worshi in 2 Z IPALTON AL 2 0 S p n, ll p , 3 ,

’ ' 2 e r e R e a G o g dw y s Pnol zcat ions .

In r w t /z s d C o n Clo , 7 . 6 . Practic al Heraldry

O r an E i o me o f E n ish A rmo . , p t gl ry S H O WING How W O A MS M AY BE O E O R A C E , AND BY H M R B RN Q UIR D , H OW E D RE E S M A Y B E T R CED O R F LY P IG A , AMI H S E A S E E I TO RI S C RTAIN D .

B Y C H A R L E S W O R T H E S Q . Y, ,

Fo rmer o f H .M . 8 2 nd Re iment and so me t ime Princ i a A ssis t ant t o t he ly g , p l

at e S o me rse t H e ra d A t ho r o f D e onshire Parishe s &c . &c . l l u v , , WITH 1 2 4 ILLU S TRATI O NS FRO M D ES IGNS BY TH E A UTHO R . ’ ’ t us n cl nt ent s b iz c i n Prospec fi v z gfi l co may e a on appl cat io . m

V w l fil 2 5 2 ols . D e y G o , 5 . Philosophy of Mysticism

(PH IL OS OPH IE D E R M YS TJ K).

B Y D R CA RL D U PRE L.

E C . M S S E . TRANS LATE D FRO M T H G E RMAN BY C. A Y CO S z— nt ro duc t io n—S c ie nc e ; It s Ca a i it o f e e o me nt —O u t he S c ie nt i c NTENT I — —p b l y D v —l p — fi m o rt anc e o f re am re am a ramat is t S o mnam u is m re am a h s i c ian T he I p D — D D b l D P y Fac ult y o f M e mo ry The M o nis t ic D o c t rine o f t he S o ul .

FO T O S . z ma Clot /z Is . URTH H U AND I , ,

The Gramm ar O f P almistry .

B Y K A T H A R I N E S T . H I L L.

S WITH E IGHTE E N ILLU S TRATI O N . — — — CO NTENTS O u t he O ut line and M o unt s O n t he Line s O u t he Palm o f t he H and and e ss e r ine s— O u S i ns o f ne ss e m e r and o n S e c ia ua it ie s—O u e adin t he L L g , , R g — Ill T p p — l Q l H ands ( E x a mpl es ) T he H ands o f Dis t inguishe d Pe rs ons Gl ossary O f Te rms .

’ [17 aenz 8 720 Glofil 1 0 5 . 6d . y , , The Indian Religions B h m O r Res s o f t he M st e rio s dd s . , ult y u u i CO N CE RNING THAT ALS O WHI CH IS T O BE UND E R S TO O D IN THE D F F E IVINITY O IR . BY HA RG RA V E E N N IN G S J , “ O O F TH E O S C C S E ES S E E S ETC. AUTH R R I RU IAN , TH IR RIT AND MY T RI , ’ ' ’ Geor e R edwa s P nél zcat z ons g y . 3

em Clot /z ex t ra D y , 73 . 6d . a a a and B con , Sh kespe re , the o a R sicruci ns .

W F C . W I B Y . . G S T O N . w WITH T o PLATES . — — — — — CO N N S Cha t e r I J ohn H e ydo n T he R o sic ruc ian o o gis t H is Farnily A nd TE —T p ’ 'Ap l Charac t e r de nt it o f ac o n s N e w t ant is wit h H e do n s Land o f t he Ro s ic ruc ians — ' I y B A l y — B and t o b e t rac e d in t he amo us o s ic ruc ian ani e s t o e s D 1 s c v r f his ac o n s H f —R M f o e y o nit ia s amo n t he e m e rs o f t he rat e rnit ro o s t hat t he ant e dat in o f t he O ri ins o f I l g M b F y P f — g g ha t e r . he r t he Ro—s ic ruc ian B ro t he rho o d w as a S pl e ndid Fraud. C p II T P o phe c y o f Para c e s us A S t a e a e r o ne o f t he re at e s t im o s t o rs O f his a e ro a S ha e s e are l g Pl y g g , b bly k — - p p p —D e s c rip t io n o f t he R o s ic ruc ian M anife s t o e s Lo rd B aco n as Chanc e llo r o f Parnas s us e e t in o f t he o s ic ruc ians in 1 6 6 at arrin t o n at a o d e in o rde r t o c arr M g R 4 W g , L g , y ’ — o ut o rd ac o n s de as A do t IO n o f hi s T w o i ars e t c . e t c . L B I p P ll , ,

Crown Cl ot /z 5 . , 5

Problems of the Hidden Life .

B E ING ES S AY S O N T H E ETHI CS O F S PIRITUAL EVO LUTI O N .

B Y PILG RIM . — — — — CO N N S z D e dic at ion A n A id t o Right ho ught The arro w Way O rt ho dox TE T — T N ' y and O c c u t is m T he oad o f t he S e nse s—Co nt e nt and S at is ac t ion— o e s A im and — l G — — f L v — O e c t The T wo at hwa s S ir hi i S idne The i he r Care e s s ne ss T he ar bj —P y P l—p y — H g l — D k N ight o f t he S o ul The G re at Q ue s t D e t ac hme nt M e dit at io n and Ac t io n D e at h S e lfl e ssne ss .

1 2 771 0 Clot/z rice Is . , , p a o a a H ndbo k of C rtom ncy ,

- Fo ne T e n and O cc t Div na o n. rtu lli g, ul i ti ’ I CA G LIO S T RO S M S C A E O F T H E M T HE NCLUDING Y TI LPHAB T AGI , G O E W E E O F FO E T H E O C E LD N H L RTUN , AND RA L O F H UMAN DE S TINY .

B Y G R A N D O R I E N T .

W t /z 2 Plat es i .

A Buddhist C atechism ;

O r O ut line o f t he D o c ne o f t he B dd a G o ama , tri u h t ,

n e in t he fo rm o f Q u e s tio n and A sw r . E W G S O F T H E S O E S S COMPILE D FRO M T H E S ACR D RITIN UTH RN BUDDHI T , FO R T H E U S E O F E O E S E O N O ES . UR P AN , WITH XPLANAT RY T B Y S UB HA D RA B H IKS H U . ’ ’ ' 4 Georg e R edways Puél zeai zom .

A bout 00 D e m 80 0 0101 11 rice 1 s . 5 pp. , y , , p 5

The Devel o pment of Marri age

and Kinship .

B N ILA N D E Y C. S TA WA K , “ ” O O F S E E O S E T C. AUTH R RP NT W R HIP ,

— — CO S re ac e . nt ro duc t io n S e ua o ra it . ha t e r I. rime a M n NTENT P f I x l M l y C p P v l a . II. S u o s e d ro misc uit . III. rimi t i e Law o f arria e . IV . ro u arria e . pp P y P v M g G p M g V . o andr . V I. n . V II o nandr . . T h u e f e e nt . IX . Kin P ly y Po lygy y . M y VIII e R l o D sc s hi t hrou h e ma e s . . ins hi t hro u h a e s . I. arr a r . p g F l X K p g M l X M i ge by Capt u e X II. M o nogamy .

D ew 8 71 0 . 1 Clo/12 1 0 5 . 6d. y , pp 3 5 , , Lives of l h m i a A c e yst c l Philosophers .

B S E O N M E S CO EC E 1 8 1 S E E E A D AT RIAL LL T D IN 5 , AND UPPL M NT D RE E R E E E S BY C NT S ARCH .

WITH A PHILO S O PHI CA L D EMO NS TRATI O N O F T H E T RUE PRINCIPLES O F

T H E M O S O R G E WO O F A C E C RE - CO N AGNUM PU , R AT RK L H MI AL

S C O S O E A CCO O F T H E S C E S . TRU TI N , AND M UNT PIRITUAL H MI TRY

B R R E DWA RD WA ITE Y A TH U .

To WHI CH IS ADDE D A BIBLI O GRAPHY O F A LCH EMY AND H E RM ETI C PHILO S O PHY .

' — — — — - — ~ LIV S O F T H E A M IS S : e e r Rhas is Alfarab i ic e nna orie n e rt us E — LCHE —T G b — — Av M — Alb h mas uinas o e r acon ain o f is e a mo nd u rno d D e M agnus T o Aq —R g B Al — L l R y —L lly A l i ano a— e an De e un T he o n Fe rarius o e o hn X X IL ic ho as Flame l V ll v J— M g M k — P p J — N l — hanne s D e Ru e c issa as i a e nt ine s aac O f o and e rnard Pe t e r B—ono J o — p B— l V l I— H ll B— re is an J ohn Fo nt aine ho mas o rt o n ho mas D a t on S ir e o rge Ri e Fic us T v — —T N —T l —G pl y D e irando a arac e s us e nis Z achaire B e rigard o f is a ho mas Charno c M l P— l D — — P T — k _ io anni rac c e sc o Le o nardi Fio ra ant i J o hn De e H e nr Khunrat h ichae aie r G v B — v — — ' y — M lM V an e mont ut e r e an D E s a ne t e ande r S e t ho n J ac o b Bohme J . B . H l B l J p g Al x — i r — n m d t — M ic hae l S e ndiv o giu—s G us t e nhov e r B—usard e A o ny o us A —e p Albe rt B e lin E ire naeus Philal e t he s Pie rre J e an Fa re J o hn Fre de ric k H e e t ius uis e e Franc e sc o — — — b — lv — G pp i ohn e do n LascarIS e is e o hn e rmann O b e re it ra e s d e nt ure s B e rr J H y D l l J H T v l , A v . m . and I mp ris onme nt s o f J os e ph B al sa o ’ eor e R edwa s Pa é ic G g y / at iom . 5

2 Vols D ew 8 0 0 . 1 Clot/l rice 2 1 5 . y , pp 79 , , p . The White King O r Cha e s t he F s , rl ir t , A N D T HE

M EN WO E L E A N D M E S L E E A RT AND M N , IF ANN R , IT RATUR AND F E T H E F S H O F T H E E O NGLAND IN IR T ALF I 7TH C NTURY.

BY W . H . DA V E N PO RT A DA M S . — — . . r h me f he h CO NTENTS O F V O L I Pe so nal His t o ry o f C arl e s I S o o t Ro yal C ildre n rinc e ss E iz a e t h u e o f o uc e s t e r rinc e s s ar and e nrie t t a uc he s s o f O r e ans —P l b , D k Gl , P M y , H , D l T he o urt o f Char e s I. : hi i E ar o f e m ro e T he Co unt e s s o f Car is e C P , P k , , S ir — l ’ l p l b —l l e ne m D i b A in s a o urit e : e o r e i ie rs u e o f uc in ham o t e s K l g y K g F v G gg V ll , —D k B k g N A o de rat e S t at e sman : uc ius Car Lo rd a and A n s o ut e S ta t e sman . h L , F k T e M ' y l l Ab l — E ar o f S t raflo rd A hi o s o he r o f t he e i n o f Char e s I. : Edward o rd e r e rt o f P R g , L H l — l p ' l — — b Che r ur im se s o f Li e and anne rs T he S t rafi o rd Le t t e rs e ndix o t e s and b y —Gl p f M — App N Co rre c t io ns nde t o V o l . I. CO S O F V O L . 1 1 . hre e o e adie s ar are t I x NTENT T N bl L M g , uc he ss o f e wc as t e ad nne anshawe M rs ut c hins o n—T he rt s in E n and D N l , L y A F , H A gl durin t he e i n O f Char e s I. 1 . us ic 2 T he rama . aint in and rc hit e t ure g R g l M ; . D ; 3 P g A c— n he e i n o f har e s I. 1 . T he o urt e t . T t M e Lit e rat ure i t R g C l — C— ly Po s ; 2 he S e—rio us Po e s n r t he e i n o f har e s I. e ndi t e s and rr t i n nd . o f Le t t e s in R g C l App x N o Co e c o s I e x t o V o l II.

S ECO E O . Crown 871 0 Clot /z ri ce 65 . ND DITI N , , p

- Dre ams and Dre am St o ries .

BY A N N A O N S KIN G S F O RD B U , M D O F S E S E O F T H E E E C S O C E O . . PARI ; PR ID NT H RM TI I TY ; AUTH R “ ” T H E E E C E ET C. E T C. O P RF T WAY IN DI T, , AND PART AUTH R ” O F T H E E EC O R T H E O F C S . P RF T WAY ; , FINDING HRI T M E DITED BY EDWARD AITLAND .

’ ew 80 0 about 00 8r. 6a. D y , 5 pp.

a a Christi n Science He ling ,

It s rinci e s and a e W h f E x ana io ns P pl Pr ctic , it ull pl t fo r Ho me den Stu ts .

Y F R A N C E L R D B S O , ’ ’ - O O F FROBEL S O E S S O S ES S O ES . CO TRAN S LAT R M TH R NG , GAM AND T RI — “ CO N T E N T s z The Twe l e Le c t ure s whic h us ually c o ns t it ut e A Co urse o f I ns t ruc t io n In ’ — v Chris t ian S c ie nc e A S im e P an for re at me nt ( a s o arrang e d fo r us e during S ix da s ) l l T ’ l y — — — — — p - e ne ra Dire c t io ns o n H e a ing T he H e a e r s S e raining e ac hing o o ! s O ught G l l l— lf—T T B l Chris t ian S c ie nce o r e e r t o b e aid fo r o me e a in ( Charac t e r and Co nduc t! W k v p — H H l g — duc at io n A s im e c c un f h ine f arma or Circ umst anc e s —Childre n and E pl A o t o t e D o c t r o K Bha av ad i a Re inc arnat io n A s ho rt Abs t rac t o f t he g G t ’ ’ e r e ea a h a h 6 G o g R zo y s Pu lic t io s .

’ ’ D e m 8 71 0 x i. ana 2 2 Clot h s . 6a . y , pp. 7 , , 7

Gilds , T he ir ri in Co nst io n O e ct s and L at e r O g , itut , bj , Histo ry . B Y T HE L E CO RN E LIU S WA LF O RD AT ,

- BARRI S TE R - A T LA W .

Co nt ains a e o ra hic a S ur e o f t he i ds o f e r s Cam rid e e r , e on G g p l v y G l B k , b g , D by D v , ouc e s t e r ant s e re o rd e nt anc ashire inc o n idd e se o r o o rt hum Gl , H , H f , K , L , L l , M l x , N f lk , N e r and O o rd S a o S ome rse t arwic o r s . b l , xf , l p , , W k, Y k

e m 8 71 0 Clot h 3 . D y , , 5 I The nfluence of the Stars . A T e a se o n A s ro o Chiro manc and r ti t l gy , y , h sio no m P y g y . R BY O S A BA U G HA N . T o WHI CH IS ADD E D A T RE ATI S E O N T H E A S TRO LO GI CAL S C CE O F M O E S O N T H E H O IGNIFI AN L UMAN B DY .

Illust rat ed with a Facs imile o t he M st ical Wheel o P t ha oras f y f y g ,

and ot her Plat es .

RE WA ’ T E R R D S E S O IC E IE . V L I Y S S O . S mall Whit e l t h 1 05 d 41 0, C o , . 6 . The M agic al Writings of a V a a Thom s ugh n . E UGE N I LA LE TE E ( US PHI S . )

A V ERBATIM RE PRINT O F HIS FIRS T FO UR T REATI S ES A N T HRO PO S O PH IA T H EO MA GICA A M G C , NIMA A I A A BS CO N DITA M A DA M ICA T H E , AGIA , T RUE C(E LUM T E RRZE.

W H T H E L P S S E S T S E O E S IT ATIN A AG RAN LAT D INT NGLI H , AND WITH A BI O GRAPHI CAL PR E FACE AND E S S AY O N T H E E S O TE RIC L E E WES E S E IT RATUR O F T RN CHRI T NDOM . B R Y A T H U R E D W A R D W A I T E . ’ Geor e R edwa s Publicat ions g y . 7

Crown t o Clot h Leat her B ach Gilt To a s 4 , , , p, s .

W RK O N PRA T H E O RIG IN A L O CT ICA L MA G IC.

The Ke y of Solomon the King . LA V]C LA A L OM N J S (C U S O .)

N ow S T S E E E O A C E M FIR T RAN LAT D AND DIT D FR M N I NT S S . T HE S M S E IN BRITI H U UM ,

B Y S . LIDD E LL M A CG RE G O R MA T HE RS “ ” O O F T H E E E T H E O ETC AUTH R KABBALAH UNV IL D, TAR T, .

W P at es it h l .

This c e e rat e d A ncient Ma ic a wo r t he o ndat io n and o nt ain he ad o f l b g l k, f u f u m ch o f t he Ce re mo nia Ma ic o f t he M e diae a O cc t ist s has never be ore u l g v l ul , f e rint d in E n lish nor et in it s resent orm in an other lan ua e be n p e g , y , p f , y g g , r i b ut has remaine d burie d and inac c e ss ibl e t o t he ge ne al publ c fo r c e nt urie s . It is t r e t hat in t he se e nt e e nt h c e nt r a e r c rt ai e d and inc o m e t e u v u y , v y u l pl a rin d i F ranc b ut t hat was far ro m e in a re ia e re ro duc c o py w s p t e n e , f b g l bl p t ion win t o t he a c it o f t he mat t e r t he re in c o nt aine d t he e rrone o s , o g p u y , u d ra in f t he Pe nt ac e s and T a ismans and t he di c t e x e rie nc e d at w g o l l , ffi ul y p

n ia M whe re with t o c o at e it . The re is a t hat t ime in o bt ai ing re l bl e S S . ll “ s mall wo r publishe d in It alybe aring t he t it le o f t he Cla ic o la di S alo mone ”k v Rido t t a b ut it is a e r diffe re nt o o t o t his and is itt e e t t e r t han a , v y b k , l l b o e ct io n o f s e rs tit io s c harms and re c e i t s o f ac Ma ic e side s e arin c ll up u p Bl k g , b b g ” a s s ic io s re se m anc e o th t o t he G rimo rium V e r m and the G rim u p u bl b u , ” o ire o f H ono rius . “ A mo ng o t he r aut ho rs both Eliphas Levi and Christ ian me nt io n t he Key o f S o o mon as a wo r o f hi h a t ho rit and the o rme r e s e c ia re fe rs t o l k g u y, f p lly d it re pe at e ly. S l mon ives ull clear and concise inst ruct ions or Talis The Key of o o g f , , f r nial M a i c as w ell as or er ormin v arious E vocat ions manic and Ce emo g , f p f g and it is t here/ b re invaluable t o any st udent who wishes t o make himself lt acq uaint ed w it h t he pract ical part of O ccu is m. eside s S e a s S i i s and Ma ica Dia rams ne ar 0 Pe nt ac es or Ta is B l , g l , g l g , ly 5 l l i in he P at e s mans are g ven t l .

8 0 lot h with F ront is iece rice 6s . Crown v , C , p , p

L e s b i a N e w m a n .

A N o v e l . D T N BY H E N RY RO RE RT S . A L O . ’ e r e R edwa s Publicat i ns 8 G o g y o .

Iz mo Clot h rice s . , , p 5

A le pp Blossoms ,

G a he e d in m O w n and in Fre nch O rchards t r y ,

PO EMS AND S O NGS .

BY W . H . C. N A T IO N .

W I S O S F D ICK S E E G . E . H C S ITH LLU TRATI N BY RANK , I K , T O W N ELEY G E E C ES CA T TE RMO LE W . G E R N , HARL , AL ,

O E . AND G . B UVI R

’ Mr N at io n s po e ms have a t e nde rne ss and c harm mo st we l co me t o t he ” — 0bse rv e r . l o ve rs O f v e rse . M r N at io n is a po e t o f t he mo st t une ful kind We s carc e ly kno w which mo st t o admire his o ri ina o e ms o r his imit at l o ns rom t he F re nch . His , g l p f ” i r —E ra swe e t p o e ms b re at he t he t ru e s pir t o f po e t y . . M r N at io n writ e s with s o much p o e t ic fe e ling t hat t he lat e st e dit io n o f m A ppl e Bl o sso ms is sure t o b e w e l c ome d by t ho se o f t he public by who ” i a ro e d H e t a e s ran wit h t he o u ar o e t s of the da . po e t ry s pp v . k k p p l p y l N e ws of t he Wor d. “ A ne w and re vise d e dit io n o f a v o lume o f c harming p o e t ry which has ee n mo st a o ura no t ic e d t his o rna and t he Pre ss in e ne ra . b f v bly by j u l , g l ’ Rey nolds s N ewspaper .

2 ls 1 2 mo rice z l s Vo . , p .

a S t i r e s ,

o i ica and o c a in ro se and V e rse . P l t l S i l , P

E W H C. N A T IO N . E DIT D BY . .

— — ’ — CO NTENTS A S art o rial Con e rsaz io ne The Bird F anc ie r s Fanc ie s A S u re ss e d — — v ’ — pp S t at e Pa e r A M ad ing A S t re e t Lam s R e f e c t io ns What I S e e and What I hink — p K — p l — T — S hade s at a Co e nt arde n a e rn A n E hi it io n o f ns e c t s A rain o f Tho u ht A v G T v — x b I — T g— Co n e nt io na e s e c t a e e rso n The o c rit e ami A S irit ua O iat e The v lly R —bl P Hyp F ly p l p p t Co n e s s io ns o f a H asso c k The Fine O ld E nglishfi G e nt l e man ( ro m a N e w P oint o f ie w) — f ’ — f — V The Co nt e m at i e Ca man s R e c re at io n T he R e e rs e o f t he e da A o ngue in a — pl v b — v M —l T ’ re e The i t o n t he in e r re ad A e t t e r ro m t he S irit o f ie ldin A re e n ro e r T — G l G g b L — F g G— g c s f p - S ho An E e ning wit h o de rn H amadr ads A n E rpe t o logic al Co e c t io n Lat t e r day p — v M y — ll — minis c e nc e s o f an E e r re e A e r t h h Pharis e e s The R e — — v g n H o ly S is t o f e P e riod T e Co ve nt garde n Co s t e rmonge r Pio us Ap e ry What O ld Fat he r Thame s s aid.

T h re are i f hara i ff i a i — w he e b t s o c c t e r h t o t o adm r t o n. N e s of t ’ ri ht ith and smart . P at it dino s ro sin s are no t in M r N at io n s B g , p y, l u u p g ” — ine The o me s are mi ht l e asant r adin S unda Times . l . v lu g y p e g. y K no c s o v e r S hams and impo st o rs like so many nine - pins falling be fo re k ” ’ a i o w e r —Pe nolds s N ews a er sk lful b l . y p p .

’ 1 r e ed a s Publicat ion 0 Geo g R w y s .

Crown 8v a . iii. and 6 Clot h ex t ra s . 6d. , pp v 44 , , 7 The Re al History of the

Rosicrucians .

FO E O N E O WN M ES O ES O N F C S UND D TH IR ANIF T , AND A T AND DO CUM E NTS CO LL ECTE D FRO M T H E WRIT S O F I E E E ING NITIAT D BR THR N .

RT H R E DWA RD W ITE BY A U A .

W I S O ITH LLU TRATI N S .

— N T E NT S Z— s t ic a hi o s o h in e rman The ni e rsa e o rmat i n— m :CO — My l P l p y G y — U v l R f o Fa a F rat e rnit at is Co n e s s io n o f R o i c ruCIan Frat e rnit arriage o f Chris t ian Ro s e ncre ut z f — y M — s icruc ianis m c he m and a ic T he Cas e o f o hann a e nt in ndre as r re s f Ro , Al y , —M g J V l A P og s o o s icruc ianis m in e rman o s ic ruc ian o o is t s : M ic hae aie r o e rt udd R G y R— Ap l g — l M , R b Fl , h mas au han o hn e do n o s icruc ianis m in ranc e os ic ruc ians and mas n —T o V g , J H y R F R Fre e o s de rn osicruc ian S o c ie t ie s & c . M o R ,

’ Mr Wait e s w o r with We de sire t o S pe ak o f k t he gre at es t re spe c t o n t he

o int s o f hone st im art ia it and so nd scho arshi . M r Wait e has i e n p y , p l y , u l p g v , r t t ime t he do c me nt s wit h whic h Ro sicruc ianism h fo r t he fi s , u as be en c o n ” ' — i t erar World ne ct e d in ex t enso . L y . “ The re is s ome t hing myst e rio u s and fasc inat ing ab o ut t he hist o ry o f the ” - Ro se . S at urda R ev iew V irgin Frat e rnit y o f t he y . A c urio us and int e re st ing s t o ry o f t he do ings o f a myst e rio us asso c iation in t ime s whe n p e o pl e we re mo re re ady t o be lie v e in s upe rnat ural phe no me na ” — - - - - t han t he hi h e d c at e d mat t e r o f ac t e o e o f t o da . M 0rnin Post . g ly u , f p pl y g T he wo r no t o n o f a re ne d s c ho ar b ut o f A M A N W H O O S k ly fi l , KN W H E IS N O and t hat is a re at de a more t han c an b WHAT WRITI G AB UT , g l e h sam i s aid fo r o t he r b oo ks o n t e e t o p c . Mu ch t hat he has t o t e ll us — me rit O f e in no t o n t r e b ut ne w . 0hn u l has t he do uble b g ly u , ] B l . “ ’ ‘ ’ o sic r c ian m i M r Wait e s b o o k o n R u is s a p e rfe c t c o nt rast t o t he o ne r t wo ac Th a - which w e no t ic e d a mo nt h o b k . e l t t e r is a farrago of ill dige st e d e arnin and round e ss anc ie s whi e t he o rme r is at all e e nt s an hone st l g g l f , l f , v , at t e mpt t o disco v e r t he t rut h abo ut t he S o c ie ty o f t he Ros y Cro ss T he st udy o f O c cul t ism is so po pular just no w t hat all bo o k s be aring o n s uch t o pic s are e age rly re ad ; and it is a c o mfo rt t o fi nd o ne writ e r who is no t ” m d t o c o n e ss his i no ranc e a t e r t e in us all he can disc o r Wes t asha e f g f ll g ve . minst er Rev iew .

M Wait e is G E O o n e so t e ric sc ience and it s it e rat re r A R AT AUTH RITY l u . Tho se who hav e re ad his e x t re me ly int e re st ing w ork up on t he writ ings o f ‘ Eli has Le i t he mo de rn ma ic ian wi e x e c t in his H ist or o f t he p v , g , ll p y ian a t rea i o f mo r h me ra im rt an and t h Ro sicruc s t se e t han e p e l po ce , e y will in d — no t b e disappo t e . M orning Pos t . S ome o f t he most int e re st ing chapt e rs in t he bo o k are de vo t e d t o an a nt o f t he o r re at a o o ist s fo r Ro sicr c ianism : R o e rt F dd cc o u f u g p l g u b lu ,

Michae Maie r Tho mas V a han and ohn H e don. Each of t he se l , ug , J y ’ G eor e R edwa s P ublicat ion I g y s . I

C ha t e rs c o nt ains m c h c rio s mat t e r e r me t a h s ic a and e r t ran p u u u , v y p y l v y sc e n de nt a b ut wo rt h e in st die d t ho se w ho a re c iat e t he in e nc e whi l , b g u by pp flu c h ” ’ t he man o rms o f o cc t is m ha e e x e rc is e d o n c i i isat io n — S t am y f ul v up v l . j es s Gaz et t e .

T o many re ade rs t he mo s t fas c inat ing page s in The Re al H ist o ry of the ’ ’ Ro sic ruc ians will b e t ho se in whic h t he aut ho r re p rint s F o x c ro ft s 1 690 t rans at io n O f The Ch mical Weddin o Chr ist ian Rosencre ut z i l y g f , wh c h had o ri ina a r i r 1 1 T S S E g lly ppe a e d n G e man in 6 6 . HI TRANG RO MAN CE IS FULL ”— O F O E S S at u rda R ev iew. W ND RFUL THING . y “ ’ W w o d re o mm d M r Wait e s e r ains t a in e ul c e n v y p k g vo lume t o all who ma b e de siro us t o e t t o t he ac o f t he Ro sic r c ian m st e r y g b k u y y . S o m ns h and i n a ma i uch nons e e as be e n t alke d w r t t e bo u t t his i g nary o rde r t hat m it is quit e re fre shing t o fi nd a writ e r c o pe t e nt and willing t o re duc e t he e e nd t o it s t rue ro o rt io ns and S ho w ho w and whe n it had it s o ri in l g p p , g . K nowled e g .

W ha e rar f hi d ri i n h e v e ly se e n a w o rk o t s e sc pt o t at was so fre e from all m a h d f i at t e pt s t t e ist o rt io n o fac t s t o do ve t ail w t h a p re c o nc e ive d H is s t e is e rs ic o s The mo st int e re st in o rtio ns o f he yl p p u u . g p t bo o k are t ho se whe re t h a t ho r i wi in a him e T o t h e u s ll g t o S p e k s lf. ose s t ude nt s o f o c c t ism who s e a at e s nde a c he d t he Int e e c t a hashish ul , p l , u b u by ll u l o f t he rha sodie s o f m s t ic ism and t he ar o n o f t he Ka a a c an s t i a re c iat p y j g b l , ll pp e a ”— ain hist o ric a s t at e me nt o f ac t s we ad c o mme nd the o o . N at ure pl l f , gl ly b k . The Re al H ist o ry o f t he Ro sicruc ians is a ve ry l e arne d b o o k t hat will b e re ad with de e p int e re s t by e ve ry o ne who has t he slight e s t kno wle dge o f t he e — 0urt our nal subj c t . C ] . “ ’ W E E O M R AITE S PAIN S TAKING AND W LL WRITT N B O K IS O N E T O BE F R T he s e c t has t o o on and ne e r mo r t ha THANKFUL O . ubj l g ( v e n at t he r nt e n t he r rt o f s e do - e arne d m st e r - mo n r p e se ) be p o pe y p u l y y ge s . But ’ s cant just ic e c an b e done t o a bo o k lik e M r Wait e s in a S ho rt no t ic e suc h as t hi and t he re ore all t hat re mains ossi e is t o draw t he at t e nt s , f p bl io n o f all int e re s t e d in s uch lit e rat u re t o t he c are ful c hapt e rs o n t he E nglish mystics — F dd V au han and H e do n— and t o e m hasise t he e st imat e wit h whi lu , g , y p ch ”— we c o mme nc e d . M anchest er E x aminer . “ a o n he s e i The re was ne e d o f a c le ar and re li bl e b o k o t ubj ct . Th s ne e d

M r Wait e has s u ie d . H e is a c t re d w rit e r and has mast e re d t h ppl ul u , e i it e ra r o f his s e c t t he mo st o f which is in t he Ge rman an a e nt re l t u e ubj , l gu ge . ‘ ’ ai i r t an c rio s re ade r H is Re al H is t o ry c annot f l t o nt e e s y u u . T he a t ho r is no t a Fre e maso n and s e a s S i ht in o f o ur rat e rnit b ut he u , p k l g gly f y ; has undo ubt e dly produc e d T H E MO S T RELIABLE BO O K which has y e t app e are d in t he E n ish an ua e o n Ro sic r c ianism and it wi de s e r e d at t ract gl l g g u , ll v ly t he at t e nt ion o f all s c ho lars and c urio us re ade rs who are int e re st e d in t he ”— 1 ( e st one N ew Yo r . s ubj e c t . y ( k) M r Wait e has do ne an e xc e lle nt se rvic e in re print ing in t his handsome o lume t ranslat io ns o f t he chie f do c ume nt s b e aring o n t he se c re t s o f the Ro sy v — L it erar World o st on . Cro ss. y (B ) i n i M r Wait e is no t a t rade r upo n t he gno ra ce and c u rios t y o f re aders . H is o wn o o is S im t he re s t o f c o nsc ient io s re se arches whe re b k ply ul u , by a n ra manuscri t s in t he he s uc ce e de d in disc o ve ring se ve r l unk own t ct s and p i rar o f t he rit ish M use m and t he se with o t he r im o rt ant and a ai l b y B u , p v l do me nt s he no w ishe s s mmarise d o r in ex t enso able fac t s and c u , publ , u , in o t he ir a e and t h s O ffe rs fo r t he rst t ime in t he it e rat re o f ac c o rd g t lu , u fi l u v ”— ’ t he s e c t T H E RO S C C S E E S E E E S E E S . P/ nla ubj , I RU IAN R PR NT D BY TH M LV hia Press delp . ’ I 2 George Redway s Publicat ions .

v ols . Crown 8 v a Cloth 6s . er vol . S O S E E . 3 , , p , LD PARAT LY Dre aml and and Ghostland

A n O riginal Co lle c tio n o f T al e s and Warnings

B an f ance and hado fro m t he o rde rl d o Subst S w .

E C G RE E D E S ES E E S CO MBRA IN MARKABL R AM , PR NTIM NT , AND IN CIDEN CE S RECO RDS O F S UL R ER S O L E PE R E CE , ING A P NA X I N O S W E S S S O ES O I BY VARI U RIT R , TARTLING T RI FR M NDIVIDUAL F H S O M S E O S H S O T H E L S AND AMILY I T RY , Y T RI U INT FR M IP L G N S S O O F RR O R , D YCHO L C L S UD ES IVIN A AT AN P GI A T I , A Y GRAVE AND G .

It is a re mark abl e fac t t hat me n and wo me n do like gho st s t o rie s The y n o e in t hri e d and man o f t he m re ad wit h a idit t a e s t c h de a e j y b g ll , y v y l l f h o rdinar h ic a k n IN E S E EE with t hings o ut o t e y p y s l e . TH THR VO LUME S ” Y P O F E S E E S — S cot sman TH EY M A S U FULL TH D LIGHT . . “ The re is pl enty o f amusing re ading o f t his s o rt t o b e fo und In the s e — o me s o th for e ie e rs and dis e ie e rs in t he s e rnat ra . C0urt v lu , b b l v b l v up u l al j ourn . “ V o ume s which wi t e st t he c re d it o f t he re ade r t o t he t mo t n l ll ul y u s , a d mi t he c o mme nc e me nt o f o ne o f t he s t o rie s ght v e ry we ll ha e s e r ed fo r t he ‘ v v t t o fo r t he who e c o e c t ion : It is a mo s t s e e ss t o t e ou t he st o r mo l ll l u l ll y y , ’ n w u wi no t e ie e it We do no t sa fo r a m b e c ause I k o yo ll b l v . y ome nt t hat ’ - i all t he s t o rie s t o d he re . C0urt Circular we disbe l e ve l . T he psycho l ogic al s t ude nt wo uld b e wise t o e xe rc ise a c e rt ain amo unt o f

i n T he e ne ra re ade r who i e s ho st - st o rie s and dre am- t ri f r c aut o . g l l k g s o e s o t he ir o w n s a e in t he s t rai ht o rward o ld ashio n wi fi nd e nt o f e nt e r k , g f f , ll pl y t ainme nt in t he se t hre e o me s and t han s t o t he arie t o f so rc e s r m v lu , , k v y u f o ” h c o nt e nt s are drawn no so rt o f mo no t o n Gra hic which t e , y . p . “ The gre at no ve l t y o f t he wo rk is t hat t he aut ho r has S O arrange d and m d t he chain O f narrat i e s as t o ma e t he m r ad i t rim e v k e l ke a t hre e vo lume

no e . In t r t h it is a no e in which t he c harac t e rs t e t he ir wn v l u , v l ll o

rie s in t he ir o wn wa and in t he ir o wn an a e . Christ ian st o y , l gu g Union .

S O BE S E C E S E ES E E S . The World H ULD P IALLYR LI H DTH WINT RNIGHT . i h w ir n m x i S t o r e s o f t e e d a d e e rie c o pl e ion wh ch S O manylik e t o c ul t ivat e ’ i h — lobe o f a wint e r s n g t . G . “ he re is no thin t hat is in an wa n T g y y u he alt hy in c harac t e r. Those , t he re o re who ha e a t ast e fo r t he m s t e rio s and t he c rio s wi fi nd in f , v y u u u ll ‘ re am and and Gho st and A E E The narrat iv e ar a D l l R AL TR AT . s e t o nc e o t h ra e and a with t o c hes o f st ran e ne ss as t o mirac o s inc id nt b g v g y , u g ul u e s r r Bu r m and sup e rnat u al o c c u re nc e s . t f o fi rst t o l as t t he re is a rat io nalism as as a i anc in t he re c o rds t hat ma e t he m in r c i e r adin we ll p qu y st u t e . Inde e d k v g , we e ie e that E E IS N O T E E O O F IT S s o arie d s o b l v TH R A TT R W RK KIND , v , B ” e nchant in and s o we e dit e d o r o ne t hat ma b e re ad wit h s c g, ll u h pro fi t . — y Christ ian Union . ’ G eor e R edw a s P ublicat ions g y . I 3

L ar e Crown 8v a t he Cover e mblaz oned and g , floriat ed w it h S tars and

S er en ts and S un owers and t he A rms o F rance and o N a p fl , f f v arre .

Gilt t o 1 os 6d. p, .

F na The ortu te Lovers .

T w e nt —se v e n N o v e s o f t he i e en y l Q o f N av arre .

T RAN S LATE D FRO M T H E O RIGIN A L F RE N CH BY A RT H R M A H E N U C .

“ ” E D ED D S E LEC E D FRO T H E H E P ERO W H IT AN T M TAM N , IT N O E S PE E ES I O C O T , DIGR , AND AN NTR DU TI N , BY A MA R F R I . Y . O B N S O N . W O E C G P. A CO M B HO O ITH RIGINAL T HING BY . J D .

’ A t e r o cc ac c io s t he se s t o rie s are e rha s t he e st o f t he ir ind f B , p p b k .

S cot sman .

’ Miss Ro inso n s no t e s and mo re e s e c ia he r a writ t e n int rod c t io n b , p lly bly u , which is rac t ic a a io ra h O f Mar are t o f A n ouléme wi e na e p lly b g p y g g , ll bl ‘ ’ re ade rs t o appre c iat e t he p e rs onalit ie s in t he st o rie s mo re ee nly t han — k d t rwi b i S cot s man . wo ul o he se e p o ss bl e . “ The se t al e s o f o ld- wo rld gallant ry c rue lly de pic t c e rt ain phase s o f t he i e o f an a e as ri iant as it was c o rr t and m s t e e r ro e at t rac t i e t o l f g b ll up , u v p v v t he ant i uarian and t he c h ar M r M a h n w r s the in isi and q s o l . c e e ll pre s e ve c ve aint t o ne o f t h o ri ina x - r n st qu e g l t e t . M o ni g Po . “ — A E C O F F E E . A t hena um R ALLY HARMINGW RK O ARTAND O LIT RATUR .

S e r- re a ist ic as t he o e - st o rie s no w and t he n are ac c o rdin t o o ur up l l v , g not io ns o f mo de st t he ha e o ne and all a who e so me mo ra and o far y, y v , , l l , g t o t hro i ht o n an in r in ri d i t h his r o f F ranc e H andso me w l g t e e st g p e o n e t o y . ly ’ o nd and o t and rnishe d wit h a charmin e t chin M r ac o mb b u g up, fu g g by J H o o d as ro nt is ie c e t he o me ma we b e re c o mme nde d t o all re ade rs f p , v lu y ll , ” — d ar i r l l Gaz ett e . an p t cula ly t o all st ude nt s O f hist o ry. Pa l M al The H e t ame ro n is it se and inde endent o f e xt e rna s an e xce e din p lf, p l , gly re t t o o a o o o f int e re st in and rat he r z z in a tho rshi and p y b k , b k g pu l g u p , ast o ne whic h s t ri e s t he k e - no t e o f a c e rt ain t ime e t t e r a mo st t han an l ly , k y b l y ” o h r sin e w r - A t he na um t e gl o k . . “ - Mis s N o re ade r c an re sist t he charm o f t he se o ld w o rld st orie s . Ro bins o n has e x e rc ise d a s o u nd and judic io us di s cre t io n Wi t ho ut sac rI ” fi c ing t o o muc h o f t he large u t t e ranc e and t he riCh aro ma o f t he o riginals . l N w s D ai y e . “ The bo o k may b e re c o mme nde d t o all who wish t o unde rst and t hat singular mixt u re o f ie t y and o lupt u o usne ss whic h dis t inguishe s t he Fre nc h — p v Re nais sanc e . A t henaeum.

T he o o is no t it e o ne fo r indisc riminat e rese nt at ion b ut it is e x c e e d b k qu p , ”— in l w e do ne and is e aut i u rint e d and o nd . Glas ow H erald. g y ll , b f lly p b u g We o we he r [Miss Ro binso n]t hanks fo r having put in a wo rthy fo rm ’ 1 4 G eorg e R edway s Publicat ions .

e o re a ne w ic a wor t o a re at e xt e nt o r o t t e n and most ass red b f publ k g f g , u ly ”— r in o r e t u n A t henwum. no t de se v g f g f l e ss . N o thin c an b e e t t r t han h int r d c t o r cha t e r and t he not e s and g b e t e o u y p , gene al ogic al t able s S ho w that c are fo r minut e ac c urac y whic h is t he fashio n ” O f t he re se nt da and a e r o od ashio n t o o . Wes tminst e r Rev iew . p y , v y g f A boo k t hat pe o pl e who lik e t o sau nt e r al o ng t he b y - paths o f hist o ry

wi re e in. A S at t he re s e nt t ime t he re are t ho sands O f e o e who ll v l , p , u p pl ‘ ’ o n c are t o re ad t he ossi and s canda in so c ie t o rna s so t he re are ly g p l y j u l , reade rs o f hist o ry who c hie fly de light in t he go ssip and sc andal o f bygo ne ‘ da Fr m s ch e o e The Fo rt nat e L o e rs is c e rt ain t o me e t wit h a ys. o u p pl u v he art we c ome whi e e en t he more se rio s st de nt s o f hist o r wi rise y l , l v u u y ll fro m it s pe ru sal with a fulle r and be t t e r knowl e dge o f t he t ime s it de als i — t w t h. Li erary World. M an f ri r rt i ar di in H as a dist inct y o t he st o e s a e no t pa c ul ly e fy g. ”— a e as a c ont ri t io n t o hi t o ric a it e rat re C0u rt Circular. v lu bu s l l u .

Crown 8v0 iii. and 2 60 Clot h ilt 6s . , pp. v , g ,

Ch arles Dickens and the

a St ge .

A RECO RD O F HIS CO NN ECTI O N WITH T HE DRAMA A S

PLAYWRIGHT AND CRITI C.

BY T E D GA R PE M E RT O N . . B

W N EW PO S C C E O F M S S E E LE E ITH RTRAIT , IN HARA T R , I J NNI ,

MR I M R T O O E . RVING, AND L

— — m t is t — i CO NTENTS The S t age in his—N o ve l s Dic k e ns as a D ra a— D c ke ns as an Ac t o r A dapt at io ns and I mpe rs o nat io ns T he S t age in his S p e e c he s The S t age in his Le t t ers ic e ns as ramat i r D k a D c C it ic .

The o o is re ada e as an t hin a o t Dic e ns is s re t o b e b k bl , y g b u k u . S cots man .

A C M r Pe m e rt o n has S are d no ains t o o o HARMING WO RK . b p p l k up all ”— so rt s o f de t ail s and has adde d a and e x c e e nt inde x . B irmin , full ll gham

Pos t . “ H e has do ne his wo rk s o c o mpl e t e ly t hat he has l e ft lit t l e o r not hing for ”— an o ne who sho d de sire t o o w in his s t e s . Lit erar World y ul fo ll p y . ‘ BRIMFUL O F AN E CD O TE AND R EMINI S CE N CE S o f a ge ne rat io n no w passing ” ’ awa t he o o is st im at in a w as s e —Publis her s Circular y , b k ul g s e ll u ful . . A n e x ampl e o f bo o k - making t hat will no t b e vie we d wit h dis favo u r by o e rs o f Dic e ns T he o o sho ws di i e nt re se arc h in man l v k . b k l g y d ire c t io ns — t ur . S a day Re v i ew . ’ eor e R edwa s P ub i at on I G g y l c i s . 5

Crown 871 0 . x iv . and 60 Clot h s 6d . , pp 3 , , 7 .

Posthum o us Hum anity ;

d f han o ms A Stu y o P t .

’ IE R B Y A D O LPH E D A S S ,

E M F S C E C E MEMB E R O F T H E B O RD EAUX ACAD Y O I N .

T S E A O E H E S . O CO P E S E RAN LAT D AND NN TAT D BY NRY L TT, R ID NT F T E T EO S O C S O C E O H H PHI AL I TY .

CO S —ac t s E s t a ishin t he E is t e nc e o f t he o st humo us e rs o na it in M n NTENT F bl g — x P P l y a It s ario us o de s o f ani e s t at io n Fac t s E s t a is hing t he . E xis t e nc e o f a S e c o nd V M M f — bl — Pe rs o nalit y in t he Living M an It s Vario us M o de s o f M anife s t at io n Fac t s E st ablishing t he E is t e nc e o f t he e rs ona it in nima s and c o nc e rnin a o st humo us nima it x P — l y A l , —g P A l y Fluidic Form o f Ve ge t abl e s Fl uidic Fo rm o f G ro s s B o die s Charac t e r o f t he Po s t humo us — — — e ing It s Ph sic a Co ns t it ut io n It s e rs io n t o Light It s R e s e r o ir o f Li ing Fo rc e B — y l — Av — v — v It s a is t ic The e r us uid E e c t ric nima s E e c t ric e rs o ns E e c t ric ant s B ll N vo Fl l A l l P— l Pl— T he M e sme ric E t he r and t he Pe rs o nalit y whic h it E nge nde rs T he S o mnambule The - - — — — — - — S e e t a k e r T he S e e r T he urning t a e T he a king t a e T he e dium irac e s l p l — T — bl T—l bl M — M l o f t h e E cs t at ic s Pro dig y o f M agic The I nc ub us T he O bs e ss ing S irit Cause s o f t he — - p R arit y o f t he Living Phant o m Cause s o f t he R arit y o f t he Trans s e p ulc hral Phant o m R e se mblanc e o f t he S irit is t ic Phe no me na t o t he Phe no me na o f t he Po s t humo us O rde r — p — - — Lyc ant hro py Gl anc e a—t t he Fauna o f t he S hade s The ir Pre occ up at io ns Ho w t he y r n t he ir E ist e nc e The o s t humo us am ire P ol o g x P V p .

Trut h sa s If o u c are fo r O S S O ES CC E E EX y y GH T T RI , DULY A R DIT D, C ELL E N T LY O S C E C E E o u sho d re ad t he T LD , AND I NTIFI ALLY XPLAIN D , y ul ’A i ’ ‘ t ranslat io n by Co l o ne l O lc o t t o f M . A do lphe d ss e r S Po st humou s ’ H manit a st d o f hant o ms . The re is no do mat ism s o do e d and u y, u y p g gg — o ffe nsiv e as t hat o f t he p ro fe sse d sc e pt ic O f t he s c ie nt ific sc e pt ic e sp e c ially who ex v i t ermini o ught t o k e e p t he do o rs o f his mind ho spit ably o pe n and h i i Wa ac e Cro o e and M it is re re shin t he re o re t o fi nd s c s c e nt st s as s . f g, f , u ll , k , ’ d A ssie r who is a Po sit i ist in t he ran s o f t he Ps chic a Re s e arch ho s t , v , k y l . Fo r m o wn art tho h I ha e at t e nde d t he se anc e o f a c e e rat e d Lo ndo n y p , ug v l b me di m and t he re c o n inc e d m s e e o nd all do t o f his im o st re I no u , v y lfb y ub p u , mo re t hink t hat t he de t e c t ion o f a me dium fraud dispo se s o f t he who l e

e st ion o f ho st s & c . t han t hat t he de t e c t io n o f an at he ist rie st dis ose s qu g , , p p w i i ia i What e e r V ie w o u t a e o f t his c o n o f the ho l e qu e st o n o f Chr st n t y . v y k t ro ve rs ho we e r I c an ro mise o u t hat o u wi fi nd t he o o int e re st in y , v , p y y ll b k g ” at l e ast if not c o nvinc ing. “ ’ ‘ T i i r l l r n ath h s c o lle c t o n o f ho pe l e ss t ash Co . O c o t t s no t e s a e be e c o nt e mpt a mo re pit e o u s lit e rary e xhibit io n than t he e nt ire v o lume has ” rare ly c o me unde r o ur no t ic e . ’ — n int e re s in and e st i o m N ew Yorh Tr ib une. A t g sugg ve v lu e . ” i h — r W ld Th o i rit t e n w t e ide nt inc ri it era or . e b o k s w v s e t y . L y — There is no e nd t o the wo nde r u st o ri in hi C0urt Circular. f l e s t s b oo k . ” Th a mm nd f marine s e b o o k m y b e rec o e e d t o t he at t e nt io n o t he . S cots man. A bo o k which will b e fo und v e ry fascinat ing by all e xc e pt t ho se perso ns who ha e ne ither int e re st no r b e lie f fo r anything b ut what t hey c an unde r —v s t and . M anchest er E x aminer . ’ I 6 Geor e Redwa s Publicat ions g y .

The s e ct is t re at e d E E S CIEN T IFI ubj RILLIANTLY , NT RTAININGLY, AND ” — B C . N ew Yorh om A dv ert iser ALLY C . . “ T ho h t his is a o o d de a t o sa M r G e o r Re dwa ha hard ug g l y , ge y s ly ”— ish d a m r ri Glas ow H erald . publ e o e c u o us b o o k . g

The ho s i fi d m h o m o r in h o —S at urda R iew g t ly w ll n u c c f t t e bo k . y ev . The bo ok has an int ere st as e videnc e o f t hat st udy o f t he o c c ult whic h is ’ a ain e c o mi in a rt ain de ashi na — anch s a dian g b ng c e gre e f o bl e . M e t er Gu r .

D em 8 va xiv and 0 Clot h s . 6d. y , pp. . 3 7, , 7

and The Life , Times , Writings D o f a a D . Thom s Cr nmer ,

T he ir t Re fo rmin A r h isho o f ant e r F s g c b p C bury .

B Y CHA RLE S HA S T IN GS CO LLE T TE .

D E C E T O E W E RD A C S O O F C E DI AT D DWARD HIT , 93 R HBI H P ANT RBURY .

’ — m rid e — ranme r s art ic i at i n in CO NTENTS Cranme r at t he Unive rs it y o f Ca b g C— P p o t he f e nr ro m at he rine H is e c o nd arria e as P ro c e e dings o f t he Di o rc e o H y VIII . C S M g a — v f — ’ Pries t H IS O at hs o n Co ns e c rat ion as an Arc hbisho p Th e Fat e o f Anne B o l e yn : H e nry s arria e s wit h ane S e mo ur nne o f C e e s Cat he rine o w ard and Cat he rine arr M g J y , A l , H , P , ’ v — ’ t i a and Cranme r s a e ge d Part ic i at io n in t he s e c t s H e nr V III. s P o i c a nd S o c ia ll A y l ’ l l ’ p h - de r r nme r e e d uidanc e e rs e c ut io ns and Cramme r s a e e d Par R e o rms un C a s a g G P , g f — ll ll f h e rmat io n unde r e nr an E dward t ic ipat io n in t he m The Pro gre s s o t e R o H yVIII d V I. — ’ — f — — Cranme r s a and art rdo m H is a e e d e c ant at io ns His WrIt in s o hn o x F ll M y ll g R g J F , t he art ro o ist —The e at i cat io n o f is ho is he r t he Chanc e o r ore and o t he rs M y l g B fi B p F , ll M , , as M art yrs .

Mr Co e t t e rin s t o his t as o th re adt h and de t h o f no w e d e ll b g k b b p l g , ” k s re e ro m re di — Globe and a de sire t o b e sc rupulo u ly f f p ju c e . . - H i animat e d an ant i Pa a s irit . ne e rt he e ss his o o is e s by p l p v l , b k — c t s man readabl e . S o . an a f rd t o ne e c t his wo r —B r it is h and Colonial N 0 fut ure st ude nt c f o gl k . Printer . “ H is oo de se r e s t o b e re ad and his e adin s S ho d b e we c on b v , pl g ul ll ” k — l a n hurch M a az ine side re d . A ng ic C g . H E H A S S TATE D H IS EVID E N CE WITH A FU LN ES S AND FAIRN ES S E YO ND ” — ‘ B D ail N ews . CAVIL . y “ M r Co e t t e a o ids it t e rne ss in his de enc e and do e s no t s c r e t o ll v b f , upl

h h in s ame is des e r e d Glas ow H erald. blame Cranme r w e n e t h k bl v . g O n t he who e we t hin t hat w e ha e in this o o a st and im art ia l , k v b k ju p l ”— c harac t e r o f Cranme r. Rec0rd. This b o o k is a v aluabl e c o nt ribut io n t o t he lit e rat u re co nc e rning a pe riod i i d in e re st it is which t o t he l o v e r o f re l gio us lib e rt y s o f t he e e pe st t . a wo r of re s e arch o f e arnin o f so und and e ne ra o f im artia d k l g, g lly p l ju g m ”— e nt . R0ch.

’ 1 8 Geor e R ed a Publicat i n g w y s o s .

Crown t 0 w ra er Is 4 , pp , .

O URN A L j OF TH E WA GN E R S O CIE T Y.

The Meister .

A S HT O N E LLIS . E DITED BY W .

m Co nt ains t ransl at io ns fro m t he l it e rary wo rks o f Ric hard Wagne r ; e xt ract s fro l e t t e rs t hat have ass e d b e t w e e n t he Po e t - Co m o s e r and o t he r me n who have le ft t he ir m p p ark u o n t h e art li e o f t he day ; o riginal art ic l e s and e s s ay s e x l anat o ry o f t he inne r p ’ f p me anin o f a ne r s dramas art ic e s u o n indre d t o ic s o f aes t he t ic s me t a h s ic s or g W g ; l p k p , p y , s oc ia ue s t i ns—in t his at e r re e re n e t t he wo r s of is z t and S cho e nhaue r wi l q o c go y , f c o k L p ll nat urally t ake a ro mine nt o s it io n ; no t e s u o n t he c ourse o f e e nt s in E uro e and p p ’ p v p me rica e arin u o n a ne r s dramas &c . & c . A b g p W g , ,

In Crown 8 va . 2 86 Clot h ex t ra s . , pp , , 5

’ A Soul s Comedy .

TE BY A RT H U R E DWA RD WA I .

A t ra e d in it s anc ie nt and e it imat e sense de ic t s the t ri m h o f destin g y l g , p u p y o e r man t he c o me d o r s t o r wit h a ha e ndin re re se nt s t he t ri m h v ; y , y ppy g, p u p o f man r d t in It is in t his se nse t hat t he s irit a hist or of as e r o e e s y . p u l y J p v ’ Cartwright is c all e d a S o ul s Co me dy .

T he Lit e rary World s ays M r Wait e is p oss esse d o f ge nuine ins pira t ion t hat lift s his wo rk ab o ve t he mass o f ware s sent fo rth e v e ry ye ar t o t he wo r d as o e t r . The re se nc e o f an o e r s t e m st ic ism and e en o f an l p y p v ub l y , v o ccasio na t in e o f a mo s t Ro sic r c ian dar ne ss wi no t re e nt o e rs o f l g l u k , ll p v l v p o e t ry fro m e nj o ying t he many passages in his play as re mark abl e fo r powe r ’ ho ht as fo r e a t o f x re i n M r Wait e s s m ath wit h N at re O f t ug b u y e p ss o . y p y u , ” r and his de sc ript ive p owe rs are lik e wise of a high o rde . In t his w o r M r Wait e has p ro duc e d a p o e m very much ab o ve t he k ‘ ’ ’ o i m ri Tho u h Th o s Co me d is ne e r i e t o av e rage o f p e t c e t . g e S ul y v l k ly e co me a o ar o o e t it wi b e re ad man wit h a c o nside ra e b p pul b k , y ll by y bl ’ a ar r e a ainst t he c irc mst anc e s amo unt o f ple asu re . J spe r C t wright s st uggl g u which ha e c o m ine d t o r in his s irit a e xist e nc e and his na t ri m h v b u p u l , fi l u p o e r t he m are o we r u o rt ra e d and c anno t ai t o int e re st s ch as are v , p f lly p y , f l u

H is an r i asin and me o dio s . S c at t e re d t ho ught fully inc line d. bl kv e s e s pl e g l u m r han o rdinar at int e rvals t hro ugho ut his vo lume t he re are passage s o f o e t y ”— e a t . S ect at or an ar 2 6 1 88 . b u y p , J u y , 9 ’ Geor e R edwa s Publicat ions 1 g y . 9

t 0 . Clot h ex t ra s . 6d. The w oodcuts coloured b hand s. 4 , pp 37, , 3 y , 5 ss u li t d t 00 co ies lain and 0 I e mi e o 4 p p 6 coloured.

a a The D nce of De th ,

In ain in and in n P t g Pri t .

B W I L D R I D G E Y T T N D A L L . . Y

W WO O C S ITH D UT .

Pro bably fe w s ubj e c t s have e xc it e d mo re c o nj e ct ure o r give n rise t o mo re ” mist a e t han t he D anc o f D e at h T he ar ie s t aint in o f t he Dance is k s e . e l p g said b e hat as e in 1 1 T he rs t rint e d edit io n was ishe d a o t o t at B l 43 . fi p publ b ut ’ 1 8 T he i u t rat in M r Wildrid e s wo r are a s e rie s o nd in 4 5 . blo ck s ll s g g k f u a i in T he s e e m o b e o f c onside ra no rt hern pr nt g O ffic e many y e ars ago . y t ble ’ a e and are so me what c o se c o ie s o f H o e in s de si ns s o far as t he o g , l p lb g y g , b ut in which o f t he hundre d e dit io ns t he y o riginally appe are d has not t o t he r n ai p es ent be e as c ert ne d .

F ca . 8va 0 Clot h lim 1 s 6d. p , pp. 4 , p, .

Light on the P ath .

A T RE ATI S E WRITTE N FO R T H E PE RS O NAL US E O F T H O S E WHO A RE I O O F T H E E S E W S O WH O GN RANT A T RN I D M , AND T E E IT I E DES IRE o NT R WITHIN S NFLU N CE .

W E O N B Y M . C . RITT N D W , H E EO S O C S O E F ELLO W O F T TH PHI AL CI TY.

o far as we c an athe r rom t he m st ic an a e in which it is c o che d S g f y l gu g u , Light o n the Path is int e nde d t o guide t he fo o t st e p s of t ho se who hav e dis c arde d t he fo rms o f re ligio n whil e re t aining t he mo ral princ iple t o it s full e st

. I i in harmo n with m c h t hat was said S o c rat e and P at e x t e nt t s y u by s l o , al t ho h t he a tho r d o e s no t use t he hrase o o o f t ho se hi oso he rs b ut ug u p l gy p l p , rat he r t he an a e o f ddhism e asi nde rst o o d e so t e ric ddhist s l gu g Bu , ly u by Bu , ho se wit ho t h a e Li h n h P h ma if t o ras t t e . t o t e at we b ut d fic ult g p by u p l g y, t hin b e said t o b e T H E O E S E S k , NLY ATT MPT IN THI LANGUAG AND IN THI CE 1 0 C C O CC S O O S and it ma b e adde d NTURY PUTPRA TI AL ULTI M INT W RD , y , wa o f urthe r e x anat io n t hat t he c harac t e r o f G a t ama ddha as by y f pl , u Bu , ’ ’ ir Edwin A rno ds Li ht o f A sia is t he e r e c t t e o f t he b e sho wn In S l g , p f yp hr sh d f Di ini hi r a T hat it ha ing who has re ache d t he t e o l o v t y by t s o d. s mult um in arv t h re ache d a t hird e ditio n s p e ak s favo u rably fo r t his p o o f e ’ i m and M C ma b e x e c t e d t a h r re sh a re s in s cie nce o f o cc ul t s . . y e p o g t e f l u l — at urda Rev iew . fut ure . S y ’ e t 2 0 Georg e R dway s Publica ions .

2 71 70 60 Clot h il t Is 6d. wit h ach o 8 Tarot Cards s . 3 , pp. , g , . p f 7 , 5

F OR T UN E TE LLIN G CA RD S .

The Tarot

cc t S i nifi cat io n U s e in Fo r ne T e in O ul g , tu ll g,

and M e t ho d o f a & c . Pl y ,

BY S . L. MA CG RE G O R MA T HE RS .

The de signs o f t he t w e nt y - o ne t rump c ards are e x t reme ly s ingul ar ; in o rde r t o give s ome ide a o f t he manne r in which Mr M at he r use s t he m in o rt ne - t e in it is ne c e ssar t o me nt ion t he m in de t ai t o e t he r with he f u ll g y l , g t an whi h he at t ac he s t o e a h o f h m The w d - b rt ge ne ral signific c e c c t e . o ul e c a o man er ma t he n draw his o wn art ic ar c onc sio ns and he wi fi nd o n c y p ul lu , ll c ramin h m in a c ordan wi i s ide rab le l at it ude fo r f g t e c c e th h s p re dile ct io ns . It s ho uld furthe r b e me nt io ned t hat e ach o f t he c ards when re ve rse d c onveys ani h c nt rar o f it s rimar si ni c at ion N 1 i t h at e e r o r a me ng t e o y p y g fi . o . s e B l u iz W er The e r s m o e s i . 2 . The Hi h Prie st e ss o r fe ma e Juggl . Juggl y b l ll g , l Wi d m r n Po e re re se nt s S c ie nc e s o o K o w e d e . . The Em re ss is t h p , p , , l g 3 p , e s m o o f A c t ion o r Initiat i e . . T he E m e ro r re re se nt s Re a iz at io n o r y b l v 4 p , p l

D e e o me nt . . The H e iro hant o r Po e is t he s m o o f M e rc and v l p 5 p p , y b l y i ni Wi e D is o i i Be ne fi ce nc e . 6 . The Lo e rs s s s t on and T ria s sur v , g fy p l m h i mo nt e d . . The Chario t re re s e nt s T ri V c t o r o e r O st ac e s 8 u 7 , p u p , y v b l . .

T hemis o r ust ic e s m o iz e s E i i ri m and st ic e . . The H e rmit J , y b l qu l b u Ju 9 , Whe e f F r n d e no t e s Pr de nc e . 1 0 . The o o t e re re se nt s Fo rt ne o o d o r u l u , p u , g b ad 1 1 Fo rt it de s mb o iz e s Po w e r o r Mi ht . 1 2 . The H an d M . . u , y l g ge an — - a man s s e nde d he ad do wnwards b o ne le me ans De o t io n S e u p y g v , lf i i r m ac rifi c e . 1 . De at h s n e s T ans o r atio n o r Chan e 1 . T m S 3 , g fi f g , 4 e per

m inat io n. 1 . The De i is t he ima f Fa anc e t i es Co e o t e o r Fat a it . , yp fi b 5 v l , g l y - - 1 6. The Li ht nin st r c T o we r c a e d a so Maiso n Die sho ws R in Dis g g u k , ll l u , u , r t io n. 1 . T he S t ar is t he e m e m o f H o e . 1 8 . The M o on s m iz up 7 , bl p , y bo l e s

T wi i ht D e c e t io n and E rro r. 1 . The S un si ni e Earth H a l g , p 9 , g fi s ly ppine ss .

2 0 . The Last d me nt me ans Re ne wa D e t e rminat ion o f a mat t e r 2 1 Ju g , l , . .

T he Uni e rse re re s ent s Co m e t io n and Re ward . O . The Fo o ish Man v , p pl l , s i ni e s Ex iat in o r Wa e rin . S e arat e me anin s wit h t he ir re s e c t i e g fi p g v g p g , p v c o n e rse s are a so at t ache d t o e ac h o f t he o t he r c ards in t he ac so t hat v , l p k , whe n t he y have b e e n de alt o ut and arrange d in any o f t he c ombinat ions re c o mme nde d t he a tho r fo r r ose s o f di inat io n T H E E H A S by u pu p v , INQ UIR R O NLY T O U S E THI S LITTLE VO LUME A S A DI CTI O NARY IN O RD E R TO R EAD ” H I E — S at u rda Rev iew S FAT . y . ’ Geor e R edwa s Publicat ions 2 I g y .

Third E dit ion rev is ed and e nl ar ed , g . W d u Crown 8 v o et ched F ront is iece and oo c t s . 2 Clot h lt s d , p , pp 3 4, gi , 7 . 6 .

a and a M gic , White Bl ck ;

O r The ie n e o f F ni e and Infi n e L fe , Sc c i t it i .

O C C H S FO R S E S O F O C C NTAINING PRA TI AL INT TUD NT C ULTI S M .

B R N Z HA RT MA N N Y F A , M . D .

CO S —T he de a —The e a and t he nre a — o rm— i e — armon — usi n NTENT — I l —R l U —l F —L f H y Ill o Co ns c io us ne ss nco ns c io us ne ss rans o rmat io ns Cre at io n i ht &c . U T f L g ,

The S at urday Re v ie w says In it s c lo se ly - print e d page s st ude nt s o f ’ o c c t ism wi fi nd hint s rac t ic a and o the rwise i e t o b e o f re at ul ll , p l , l k ly g r i t t he m in t he r it o f t he ir t udie s an r s ar h A s e v c e o pu su s d e e c e s . bo o k which ma ro e r ha e t he t it e o f M a ic fo r if t he re ade rs s c c e e d in y p p ly v l g , u r t ic a o o win it s t e achin t he wi b e a e t o e r o rm t he re a p ac lly f ll g g, y ll bl p f g t e st O f ’ all ma ic a e at s t he s irit a re e ne rat io n o f Man. Dr H art mann s o o g l f , p u l g b k has a s o o ne int o a t hird e dit io n and has de e o e d ro m an insi ni c ant l g , v l p f g fi ‘ am h e t writ t en o ri ina fo r t he r o se o f de mo ns t rat in t o a fe w p p l , g lly pu p g ine xpe rie nc e d inquire rs t hat t he st udy o f t he o c c ul t S ide o f nat ure was no t ’ ide nt ic a wit h t he i e rac t ice s o f so rc e r int o a c om e ndio s o me c om l v l p y , p u v lu , risin w e are wi in t o e ie e T H E E E O S O C S S E O F p g, ll g b l v , NTIR PHIL PHI Y T M S The re are a ndant e ide nc e s that t h S c ie nc o f t he o so h O CCULTI M . bu v e e p y has made ast s t ride s in ic e s t imat io n o f at e e ars and t hat t ho s e v publ l y , desiro s o f e x e rime nt in in t his art ic u ar and in man re s e c t s asc inat in u p g p l , y p f g, n h o f e t hics ha e e ade rs who se t e ac hin t he c an o o w wit h sat is a i b ra c , l g y f ll f c t o n ” v t o t he mse lve s . The S cot s man says A ny o ne who stu die s t he wo rk so as t o b e abl e t o rst and it ma e c ome as ami iar wit h t he hidde n m st e rie s o f nat r unde , y b f l y u e as ” t hi o so he r e e r was any oc c ul p l p v .

Crow n 8v o 2 6 Clot h ex t ra s . , pp. 5 , , 6 Lotus

A s c o o a Ro mance P y h l gic l .

“ ” H E A O O F A N EW M E BY T UTH R ARGU RIT E .

S C E C E t he o o has o ri ina it M , , b g l y Y TI AL P ULIAR NGAGING k — it is a rac e ful st o ry o f t he s o rt whic h is said t o ma e pe o ple so me pe o ple — g k — thin and wi b e re ad wit h mix e d e e in s most . A thena u m. k , ll f l g by “ A e rc e and assio nat e o o which i st rat e s o nc e mo re t he ho d t hat fi p b k , llu l ”— h ar ima inat io n T O BE E . hl . o ur s ubj e ct has o n t e p o pul g . R AD n ’ 2 2 Geor e R edwa s Publicat ions g y .

Crown 8 v a . iv . and 2 6 Clot h Chea E dit ion 65 . , pp 5 , ( p ), A Professor of Alchemy D ( E N IS Z A CH A IRE ) .

BY PE RC RO S S Y , O O F E O E AUTH R A COM DY WITH UT LAUGHT R .

A c e e r st o r The he ro i an a che mist who ac t a s c ce eds in l v y . s l u lly u man ac t rin re d uf u g pu go l . ” S hado w and dre am- i e — A t henwu7n y l k . . ” A n int e re st in and athe t ic ic t re - t erar World g p p u . y . The st o r is t t e r t ra ic a and is o we r t o d — West minst er y u ly g l , p fully l .

Rev iew. m — ’ A i id ict re o f t ho se b ad ld t i e s . A nowled e v v p u o g . S E O F A S EC C C E O F E E S CO E S ES UR P IAL IR L R AD R WITH NG NIAL TA T . ra h c G p i . This is a s t o r o f o e— o f de e nd in re nin o e — no t witho t su y l v p, u y g, fi g l v u g

e st io ns o f Fa st . The re o f e re n aria his wi e is a no e and t o c h g u figu B g , f , bl u in o ne and he r rit and swe e t ne s s s t and o ut in e a t i re ie rom t h g , pu y b u ful l f f e ’ gl o o m o f t he alche mist s labo rat o ry and t he ho rro rs O f t he t e rribl e Inq uisit io n

int o who se hands she a s . T he ro manc e o f t he c r c i e ho we e r is no t all f ll u bl , v , e rmeat e d s h ro s a o rs and t in e d wit h t art ar n m Th i p by ulp u u v p u g e a s o e . ere s ” k O t en a hi r m i me — las ow e ra d f ghly d a at c e l e nt . G g H l .

F ca 8 v0 6 Clot h lim 1 s . p. , pp. 5 , p,

The Sh akespe are Cl assic al Dictionary

O r M ho o ica A sio ns in t he a s o f , y t l g l llu Pl y

ha ar E S kespe e x plaine d.

FO R THE U S E O F S CHO O LS AND S HAKE S PE ARE READI N G E E S O CI TI S .

B Y H M E L . . . S BY

A hand it t e wor o f re e re nc e fo r re ade rs and st de nt s o f S ha es e are y l l k f u k p . S chool B oard Chronicle.

The o o re se nt s a re at de a o f info rmat io n in a er sm b p g l y all co mpass . — k v S ch00l N ewspaper. ’ Geor e Redwa s Publicat ions 2 g y . 3

Wi b e o nd e xt re me se no n- c assic a st de nt s o f S ha e s e are ll f u ly u ful by l l u k p , ” and e e n t o t he c assic a st de nt it wi c on e m c h se in o rma ion — v l l u ll v y u u ful f t . E ducat ional Times .

Wi b - — e re at a re c iat e d in the c as s ro o m. Glas ow H l ll g ly pp l g era d.

Care c o m i e d ro m more a thorit at i e o o s o f re e re nc e —S cot s fully p l f u v b k f .

The unl e arne d re ade r is t hus e nabl e d t o inc re ase ve ry great ly his e nj o y ” — me nt o f S ha e s e are . L it erar World k p y . “ WE E E HAV T S TE D T H E B O O K by lo o king fo r s e v e ral o f t he o bs c ure st m tho o i a am m nt i e d ha y l g c l n e s e o n by S k e spe are ; in e ac h c as e we fo und t he m In — na e se rt e d and o o we d a sat is ac t o r e x anat ion. he S h f ll by f y pl T c oolmast er .

m i D e 8v0 v and 2 Clot h ilt 1 os . d y , pp. . 99, g , 6 .

Serpent Worship ,

A nd o he r E ssa s w i h a C a e o n T o em sm t y , t h pt r t i .

B Y C. S TA N ILA N D WA KE .

— — — CO N T E N T s z Ri e rs o f Li e Pha is m in nc ie nt R e igions O rigin o f S e r e nt Wo rshi — v f ll —A l — p p The Adamit e s The D e sc e ndant s of Cain S ac re d Pro s t it ut io n M arriage amo ngPrimit ive — r a r — me nt f t he m — Pe o le s M ar iage by C t u e D e e l o o Fa ily T he S oc ial o sit ion o f p ' “ p v —p — Wo man as afi e c t e d by Civiliz at io n S pirit is m and M o de rn S p irit ualism To t e ms and i m—M n h To t e m s a and t e A pe .

The mo st impo rt ant o f t he thirt e e n e ssays disc uss e s t he o rigin o f S e rp e nt

Wo rshi . Li e o t he r a e rs which acc o m an it it disc sse s it s s e c t ro m p k p p p y , u ubj f a wide kno wle dge o f t he lit e rat ure o f e arly re ligio ns and t he allie d t he me s o f r o o and rimit i marria The re maini a ar E ant h o p l gy p ve ge . ng e ss ys e WRITT N C E C E S O F ha i WITH MU H L ARNING AND IN A AR FUL PIRIT INQ UIRY, pp ly fre e from t he c rude myst icism wit h which t h e dis cu ssio n o f t he se subj e ct s has e e e n mixe d The ma m O ft n b up . y y b e re c o me nde d t o t he at t e nt ion o f all int e re st e d in ant hro po l ogy and t he hist o ry o f re ligion as int erest ing labo u rs ’ — in this e d o f re se arch and S e c at ion. S cots man c t o e r 1 fi l p ul , O b 3 . “ S o o s c re and c o m e x are t he s e s e c t s t ha an c o nt ri io n how b u pl ubj t y but , ’ i ht t o t he ir e cidat io n ma b m W ri i i m o f e er s e we c o e d . M r a e s c t c s v l g , lu , y l k t e ms O f o t he rs is re e nt ac t e M r Wa i d h e t he sys f qu ly u . k e s o ppo s e t o t o s n hi r m who ho ld t hat ki s p t h o ugh fe al e s and t he mat riarc hat e p re c e de d pat ernal inshi and t he at riarcha ami and who c o nne c t t he he no me na o f k p p l f ly, p x o am and o f t o t e mism wit h t he mat riarc ha s t a e O f ie t and wit h e g y l g so c y , ie in a de nit e inshi o f man with t he re maind r i ni rs e b e l f fi k p e o f t he se ns bl e u ve . m in hi H e lo o k s upo n fe ale k s p as having e xis t e d c oncurre nt ly with a quas i ” m — A t hence um pat riarchal syst e . . “ — A e and E M E ES . Glas ow H erald bl , R ARKABLY INT R TING g . ’ r e R u l t 2 4 Geo g edway s P b ica ions .

Wra er rice 1 s . pp , p

o urnal of the B acon Society .

P S E PE O C UBLI H D RI DI ALLY .

V l x and 2 S W cl h s d o Part s i . t o. . . 8 ot 6 6 . . I. ( pp 7 , , , .

— T he main o bj e c t s fo r whic h t his S o c ie t y has be en e st ablishe d are (a) T o st d t he wo r s o f Franc is ac on as Phi o so he r Law e r S t at e sman and u y k B , l p , y , , hi harac t e r e ni s and i e his in e nc e o n his wn and su Po e t , al so s c , g u , l f , flu o c c din ime s and t he t e nde nc ie s and re s t s o f his writ in s b T ee g t , ul g ( ) o ’ inv e st igat e Bac o n s supp o s e d aut ho rship o f c e rt ain wo rk s unac kno wledge d by him inc din t he S ha e s e arian dramas and o e ms . , lu g k p p

F ca . 8v 0 . iii. and 1 2 0 Cloth s . 6d. p , pp v , , 3

’ a a a A W yf rer s W llet .

D o min Re i i u s d v v us.

B Y H E N R H E WLE T T Y G . “ F S E F E S E AUTHO R O A H AF O V R S .

i mi R di i s indi at e t h aim o f t h m The t t l e Do nus e v vu c s e e po e . The a tho r wishe s t o t e t he st o r o f t he ac t a e s s and t o cont rast his t eachin u ll y u l J u , g h r sin b hri t ian with t hat o f t he Chu rc e s p o fe s g t o e C s . H e be l ongs t o t he re at Ch rch t o b e whic h wi so me da inc de not o n t he rea e s s g u , ll y lu ly l J u as o ne of it s w o rshi e rs b ut G a t ama and S o c rat e s and P at o and e e r pp , u , l v y ’ T he w o r o f his h r ho ly name whic h bl e ss e d t he past . k t C u c h is t o bre ak n c a t e t o he t he o o r t o swe e t e n all t he i e o f man T i do w s , lp p , l f . h s is sufli c ie nt we t r st t o ide so me re ade rs t o a oo int e re s t in in it se f and , u , gu b k g l , p ro bably de st ine d t o s e t many a wave ring mind o n a pat h at onc e de finit e In re ard hri ianit — The In uir r and right g t o C st y. q e .

A c o e ction o f e rse s o n ario s s e c t s and in ario s s t ll v v u ubj v u yl es. i r i all ha t he me o dio sne s an N o t o ne b ut s w o t h re ad ng . ve l u s d flue ncy o f ‘ ’ s ont ane it t he rin o f o e t r . D o min s Re di i s far t he p y, g p y u v vu , by ar e s t o e m in t he o o is a e a for t he Christ ianit o f Christ in which l g p b k , pl y , h h o f r nd h — z1 r l a t he re is a we alt b ot po e t y a t o ught . Li e poo D ily Post .

’ nr H w e t t s ne w o me O f e rse has man re h n M r H e y G . e l v lu v y f s a d

at t rac t i e ie c e s and no t a d o ne amon it s c ont e nt s . The a ads v p , ull g b ll m st wide at t rac t i e T he so nne t s S ho w M will p ro ve o ly . r ’ v H e w e t t s owe r o f ith o rc i e e x re ssio n at it s est . The o me as a l p p y, f bl p b v lu , ” who e wi b e re ad wit h e as re ro m rst t o ast o ers of o et r . l , ll pl u f fi l by l v p y

S cot sman .

’ 2 e P 6 G eorg e R dway s ublicat ions .

The memo ry o f J ohn Barl e yc orn is in no dange r o f passmg away fo r l ack o f a de o t e d ro he t . The man s on s oe ms and ie c e s o f ro se writ t e n v p p y g , p , p p In Praise of A le fo rm a fi ne garde n fo r t he antho lo gist t o cho o se a bo uq ue t

ro m. It is ain O CO E C O made with di i e nc e f pl ly AN RIGINAL LL TI N , l g ’ M r M ar hant t ho o ma b r o m and go o d t ast e in s e le c t io n. c s an l gy y e e c me nde d t o t he c urio us as an int e re s t ing and c are fully c o mpil e d c o ll ec t ion i in all i r — S cot s man of p o e t cal and sat iric al pie c e s abo ut b e e r t s b e ws . . Th h i n and mo de rn s rc e s fo r his ac t s and e aut or has go ne t o anc e t o u f , has no t c o nt e nt e d himse with me re re c o rdin t he m b ut has wo e n t he m lf ly g , v ”— int r a hi i and wit A merican B ookseller. o a e ad bl e st o ry with much sk ll . “ Al tho h it s c hie aim is t o b e am sin it is so me t ime s ins t r c t i e as ug f u g, u v we . His st o rie s ma at t ime s b e a it t e o n b ut t he are ne e r ll y l l l g, y v ro ad — las ow H erald b . G g . “ ’ ER E - O O a c o e c t io n What t e e t o t alle rs w o uld c all A T IPPI. S T XT K ll B ” o f s o n s and a ads e i rams and ane cdo t e s which ma b e c a e d u ni ue . g b ll , p g , y ll q

Pall M all Gaz et t e . e e r ho we e r in c o n nc t io n wit h mi ht ro ast e e ac c o rdin t o M r B , v , ju g y b f, g M archant has made E n and what it is and ac c o rdin he writ e s his o o , gl , gly b k t o S ho w ho w t he En ish ha e e e r o e d o o d ale and ho w m ch e t t e r gl v v l g , u b v ‘ i i i i r in t hat is fo r t he m t han c he ap and ne c e ssar ly infe r o r S p r t s o do ct ore d w e s . Be t hat as it ma we ha e he re a c o e c t ion o f o c c as io na e rse — sat ire s y , v ll l v , e i rams h mo ro s narrat i e s t ri ia dit t ie s and a ads— E A S p g , u u v , v l , b ll VALUA L ”— B S O S O F E S Lit era7 World . ILLU TRATI N MANN R . y

em 8 oo l t h red ed es s 6d D y , C o , g , 7 . . T he T he o lo gical and Philo so phical Wo rks

Hermes Trismegistus ,

CH R IS T IA N N E O PLA T O N IS T .

E O T HE E E P E TR S L D FR O R L G R , W H R F CE N O ES AN AT M IGINA K IT A , T , I E AND NDI C S . D M E R M . B Y O H N DAV I CHA S A . J B , , O F O E CO E E O O ECO E O F N EW S RI L LL G , XF RD , R RD R ARUM .

“ O PIN IO N O F T H E A UT H O RS O F T H E PERF E CT WA Y.

T he o o is most s c ho ar and e arne d and o f re at a e fo r it s c o a b k l ly l , g v lu ll t ion o f t he i e P at o and o t he r S c ri t ure s wit h t he H e rme t ic sho win B bl , l , p , g f a in h l H e c m o ne syst e m o t ho ught as pe r d g t e m al . o e s t o t he c o nc lusio n — v —which w e a so e nt e rt ain that t he s o - c a e d H e rme tic o o s whi e re re l ll b k , l p nt in in art anc ient E t ian doc t rine e o n t o an e ar hri ia se g, p , gy p , b l g ly C st n o r e rha s S i ht rae - Christ ian— e rio d and are int e nde d t o S ho w t he , p p , l g ly p p , ide nt it o f t he o t oin and inc o min s st e ms and rid e o e r t he a y u g g g y , b g v g p

e t we e n t he m if an . H e o mit s t he V ir in o t he World as e o n in t o b , y g f , b l g g me o t he r scho o and a so t he A scle ius or Treat ise o n Init iat ion s o t ha s o l , l p , , t do e s n t e rs e de t ha whi h we t r n a t he b o o k o sup t c a sl t e d and e dit e d . The t ho r o r rat he r e dit o r is no t an o c c t ist b ut arrin t his e e ment hi au , , ul , , b g l , s ” wo rk is a gre at addition t o H e rme t ic lit e rat ure . ’ 2 Georg e R edway s Publicat ions . 7

6 a es lar e 8v a Cl ot h ilt r ice 6s . 9 p g , g , g , p

Lectures o n Dise ases of the Ey e .

BY CHA RLE S E LL TA LO R M . D . E . B Y , DIN , FELLO W O F T H E M E DI CAL S O CI ETY O F LO ND O N LATE PR E S ID E NT O F T H E PARI S IAN M E DI CAL S O CI ETY CO NS ULTING O PHTHALMI C S URGEO N T O T H E N O TTINGHAM UNI O N HO S PITAL ; CO N S ULTING O PHTHALMI C S URGEO N T O T H E MIDLAND IN S TITUTI O N FO R T H E BLIND H O NO RARY S UR G EO N T O T H E N O TTINGHAM A N D E YE ETC ET C MIDLAND INFIRMARY, .

I S E P O O S N E O S WO O C S LLU TRAT D WITH H T GRAPH AND UM R U D UT .

— — — uin u ma— t ico - Ci iar e uro t o m CO NTENTS Le c t ure s o n Cat a—rac t S q t Gl a co O p l y N y The Us e and Abuse of Mydriat ic s E y e Tro uble s In G e ne ral Prac t ic e .

The de scri t i ns O f t he dise ase s me nt io ne d are w e i e n and ma e r p o ll g , y y — v v ad ant a e ous b re ad t he e ne ra rac tit io ne r Lancet . v g ly e by g l p . T o t ho se who wish t o e r e c t t he mse e s in o ht ha mic s r e r t he o o f l p l u g y , b p — v k wi b nd a a a a h H os it al Gaz et t e . ll e fo u re lly v lu bl e e lp . p A valuabl e c o u rse o f Le c t ure s c alling fo r so me thing mo re t han passmg no t ic e an o inion whic h all who re ad t he disc o rs e s wi he art i e ndo rse . , p u ll ly — s A clepiad.

Crown 8 va xi i . and 6 Clot h 1 0s . 6d. , pp. 66 , ,

and Myths , Scenes , Worthies

of Somerset .

B Y M R E O GE R . S . B

O S z—Bladud in o f rit ain o r T he e e nd o f at h— o se h o f rimat he a C N N , g ; , L g J TE T K —B B —p A and t h e e e nd o f ast o n ur at c he t T he e e nd o f S t e c uman o r o c and S t L g Gl b y W , L g D P l k — — D ub rit ius in rt hur in S o me rs e t - S t e na t he ir in o f e ns ham i das K g A K y V g , K y G l Bado nic us c a e d i das t he ise a s o i das t he ue ru o us— S t B rit hw ald rc h isho , l—l G l W , l G l Q —l , A b p o f Cant e r ur in Ina in S o me rse t Ina and dhe m S t Co u ar and Co n re s ur b y K g , Al l g g b y H un t h e e ade r o f t he S umo rsae t as at t he at t e o f E llandune— in re d in S o me rse t , L , g , — B l K— Alf and t he e e nd o f S t e o t S t A t he lm rc h is ho o f Cant e r ur Wulfhe lm rc h is ho L g , , — N A b p — b y A b p o f Cant e r ur T he andin o f t he ane s at VV at c he t T he ime s o f S t uns t an H is b y — L g D T D : i e and e e nds uc he ne e —E t he l ar rc h is ho o f Cant e r ur —S i e ric o r L f L g M l y Abb—y g , A b p b y g S iric ius rc h is ho o f Cant e r ur E lfe ah E l hé e o r A l he e rc h is ho o f Cant e r — , A b p b y , p g , — p g , A b p ur E t he lno t h o r A e lno t h rch isho o f Cant e r ur o nt ac ut e and t he e e nd O f b y —, g , A b p b —y M L g a t ham Cro s s o r o c and aro d so n o f o dw in as t o n ur a t e r t he Co n ue s t W l P l k , H l G Gl b y q , — “ f — isho hurs t an i iam o f a me s ur c a e d a so S o me rs e t anus The hi o B p T W ll M l b y, ll l — P l s o he rs o f S o me rs e t in t he w e t h and hirt e e nt h Ce nt urie s T he Ro s e o f Canningt o n ' T l T p f ” — — o an Cliflo rd c o mmo n c a e d air R o s amo nd ohn de Co urc S t ric t he J , ly ll — F J — y Ul e c us e o r S t W ulfric t he e rmit S ir i iam de Briw e re o o ds rin rio r and t he R , H W W g P , l — ll p y urde re rs o f ho mas a e c e t ic hard o f c he s t e r o r ic hard T o ck liv e o r o re M T B k R Il , R M a s we o us e ne ar rid e wat e r—T he e e nd o f t he o us e f T nt e — it ham rio r H l ll H , B g L g H o y W P y —~ — and S t u h o f a o n ( in ur und i iam o f ro t ham oc e ine ro t man o f e s H g Av l B g y) W ll W J l T , W ll ’ 2 8 G eor e Redwa s Publicat ions g y .

— u h ro t man o f e s — o e r ac o n—S ir e nr Brac t o n o rd Chie ust ic e in t he H g T , W ll R g B H y , L J - — f e i n O f e nr III i iam B riwe re ( Brie we re rue re , o r re we r) uns t e r Cas t e , R g H y W ll , B B D l S ir R e ina d de o hun ad o hun— u e o f S am o rd—S ir o hn H aut v ille and S ir g l — M , L y M —F lk f J o hn S t Lo e S ir S imo n de o nt ac ut e T he E i e ddin Che w a ua and S t ant o n J — — M l W g , — M g v - re w o e rt Burne l S o me rt o n in ohn o f ranc e S t o e unde r H am S ir D R b — , K g J F k — , at t he w o urna rist o ( S t ar R e dclifi e ) , The Cany ge s ; Chat t e rt o n ho mas de M G— y B l M y — T B e c k n t o n T he e e nd o f S ir i c hard hit t in t on T he Le e nd o f t he b o t o f y g — L g — R W g — g Ab M uc he lne y S e bas t ian Cab o t Taunt o n and it s S t o ry Gile s Lo rd Daub e ne y and t he ’ Co rnish e e io n in na a ac e and S o ut h e t he rt o n— o hn o o e r T he arian R —b ll , K g I s P l P J H— p , M e rse c ut io n The Paule t s aw e t s o r Po ule t t s o f int o n S t e o r e ichard E dwarde s P , P , , H g R — —l G— Lo rd Chie us t ic e Po ham T he Las t D a s o f as t o n ur n lliam ar o w and t he fJ —p y G—l b y — B l ime s o f E dw ard V I. o e rt arso ns o r e rs o ns e nr Cuff S ir o hn arrin t o n T R b P , P H y J H g T he adhams adham Co e e O o rd mins t e r M e rrifi e ld t on—S amue aniel W —, W ll g , xf ; Il , — , Il — l D D r o hn u ho mas Co r at e o f O dc o m e In S o me rs e t o hn P m S ir mias re st o n J , , y P — B ll T — y — b J — A — dmira a e \V illiam P nne S ir a h o rd H o t o n Ral h Cudwo rt h O u A l Bl k ry R lp—, L p— p it c he s M rs e a e o f M ne he ad S o me rs e t o hn o c e T ho mas K e n D . D . s o me W , L k y , y , J L k , , — W ham—The t i me is ho o f at h and e s re nt ous e Char e s II. and Co o ne nd B p B W ll T— H , l l l y D uke o f M o nmo ut h i n S o me rs e t Princ e G e o rge o f D e nmark and J o hn D uddle s t on o f ris t o — e au as h wit h s o me c c o unt O f t he Ear is t o r o f t he Cit o f at h B l B N , A ly H y y B Wok e o r O c e o e ne ar e s—Ca t ain S t Loe —T he S t at e o f t he Church in t he y k y H l , W ll p E i ht e e nt h Ce nt ur M rs annah and M rs at t o re and Che ddar—D r ho mas g y , H P y M T o un —Edward aw ins ro o st O f O rie and Cano n o f o c he s t e r—Char e s Fu e Y g — H k , P v l — R l g o wde r A a e o f at c he t T he e at h o f ane Ca e s Ca t ain o hn annin S e e L T l W , D J H g k ’ p p J — p Che ddar Che e s e e st Pe nnard s e ddin re s e nt t o t he ue e n 1 8 In e moriam , W W g P Q , 39 M , ~ I 8 I I I 8 33.

M s o e r i b e raise d f r he r nt h iasm an z a h is o f r B g s t o p o e us d e l . S e S o me rs et and she nat ra t hin s it t he wo nde r O f E n and if no t of t he , u lly k gl , ” r d — it erar World wo l . L y . Ev e ry addit io n t o t he l o c al c o lle c tio ns o f t he myths and l ege nds O f o ur c o unt ry dis t ric t s is t o b e we l c o me d whe n it is as c are fully made as M rs ’ Bo e r s a o rious c om i e d w or whic h E E S S O E S g l b ly p l k , T M WITH Q UAINT T RI , ”

E F C A RE E E E . West minst e r R ev iew S O M O WHI H V N B AUTIFUL . T his is t he ind o f o o w e ima ine in whic h Thomas F e r wo d k b k , g , ull ul ‘ ’ W r hie s i ha e e x at iat e d wit h de i ht . Le ss t o o ra hic a t han his o t t v p l g p g p l , do e s what t hat de l e ct abl e b o ok did no t p ro fe ss t o do ; it give s no t o nly an ac c o nt o f t he i ust rio s nat i e s b ut t he e e nds t radit io ns hist o ric a u ll u v , l g , , l e iso de s and ene ra memorabilia which e rt ain t o o ne amo s c o nt . Mrs p , g l p f u u y ’ Bo e r s o o ran e s ro m Bladud Kin o f rit ain B . C. 0 0 t o A rth r g b g f , g , 9 , u k — B H a m who die d in 1 8 . N 0t es and ueries . llu , 33 Q “ The wo r is o n M rs B oge r writ e s w it h su c h abilit y and e nt hu siasm. k e which wi ha e an in e nc e in imit s far wide r t han t he o rde rs o f S o me rse t ll v flu l b , fo r F EW CA N E O E S E O E O O R AD IT WITH UT PL A UR , AND N N WITH UT PR FIT . ” T r ad h r ar is o mas e r t he ha io o O f t he c o nt O e e bo o k c e fully t t g l gy u y . M n orn i g Post .

G E O RG E RE DWA Y’ S

a fi a al Of Cl ssi ed C t ogue Books ,

RE LATING T O O CCULT PHILO S O PHY AND A RCHt EO LO GY ; E MB RA C~ IN G CO E C O S O F W O R S O N A S O O M ES E S LL TI N K TR L GY, M RI M , E T E S M S A C E RE O A LCH Y H O O PHY, D YS C ; L S M , AN TI I M N I NT IGI N AND MYTHO LO GY ; O RI E NTAL A NTIQUITI ES ; FR E EMAS O NRY AND S ECR E T S O CI ETI E S ; W E S TE RN PHILO S O PHY AND S CI E N CE.

It 5 c e rt ain t hat o ne ranch at e ast o f his t o rica e n uir —t hat which de a s w it h t he 1 b l l q y — l o rigin and de e lo me nt o f re ligio us b e lie t hro ugho ut t he wo rld is at t rac t ing t o it se l an v p f — ' f i nc re as i n de re e o f at t e nt io n and int e re s t . ua r t e rl R ev i ew ul 1 886. g g Q y , j y ,

’ r R w P 30 G eo g e ed ay s ublicat ions .

Crown 8v a Cloth s 6d. , pp. 375 , , 7 .

Theosophy , Religion ,

O ccult Science .

B Y H E N R S . O LCO T T Y , E E F T H E E S S E PR S ID NT O TH O O PHI CAL O CI TY .

W G O S S O F E S E WO S ITH L ARY A T RN RD .

— — — CO N N S he o so h o r at e ria is m Which The he o s o hic a S ocie t and it s —TE T T p y M l — T p l y ims T he Co mmo n o undat io n o f all e i ions T he s o h : t he S c ie nt i c as is o f A — F R l g — p y — fi B Re igion he o so h : it s Frie nds and E ne mie s The O c c u t S c ie nc e s S irit ua is m and l T— p y — l p l — he o so h ndia : ast re se nt and ut ure T he Ci i isat ion t hat ndia ne e ds The T p y I P , P —, F v l I S irit o f t he Z o ro as t rian e i io n t he i e o f uddha and it s e ssons SIC. p R l g L f B L ,

The M anchest er E x aminer de s c rib e s t he se le c t ure s as RI CH IN INTER ES T ” “ A N D S ES E ES S and s a s t hat t he t he o so h e x o nde d in t hi UGG TIV N , y p y p u s ” o me is at o nc e a t he o o a me t a h sic and a so c io o and c o nc de s v lu l gy, p y , l gy , lu ’ a e n th no t ic e st at in t hat Co o ne O lc o t t s o me de se r e s and wi l g y by g l l v lu v , ll re a t he st d o f all re ade rs for who m t he wa s o f s e c at io n ha e an p y, u y by y p ul v m irre sist ibl e char .

m 8 vo . x i i . and 2 Clot h 1 0s d D e y , pp 3 4, , . 6 .

Incidents in the Life o f Madame

Blavatsky .

CO MPILE D FRO M INFO RMATI O N S UPPLI E D BY H ER RE L ES D FR E DS ATIV AN I N ,

D E E A . P. IN N E T A N DIT D BY S T .

WITH A PO RTRAIT RE PR O DU CE D FRO M AN O RIGINAL PAINTING BY H E S C EC E RMANN HMI H N . — — — — S Chi dhoo d arria e and ra e A t o me in us sia 1 8 8 Mme . CO N N g H R , 5 de TE T’ l — M T v l — — rat i e ro m re nt ic e shi t o ut de n me ri J e liho wsk y s N—ar v F App p D y R e s i ce in A ca E st ab lishe d in ndia A is it t o E uro e & c . I V p ,

Trut h s ays For any c re dul o us frie nd who re ve ls in s uc h st o rie s I c an ‘ ’ Inc ide nt s in t he Li e O f Madame a at s I E E re c omme nd f Bl v ky . R AD V E RY ” E ES LIN E O F T H E BO O K WITH MU CH INT R T . i fi n difi at i n n in n The o so phist s w ll d bo t h e c o a d t e res t i t he book . ’ a ubl at i n 1 Georg e R edw y s P ic o s . 3

iii. and 3 0 Cloth i lt s 6d Post 8v 0 . , , 7 . . , pp v 5 g a a The Blood Coven nt ,

Primitive Rite ,

A nd it s Be a n s o n re ri g Scriptu .

BY H CLA Y T R M U LL D . D . . U B , — — CO NTENTS The Pr imit iv e R it e It s elf ( I ) S o urc e s o f Bibl e S t udy A n Anc ie nt mit i it e T he rimit i e it e in ric a rac e s o f t he it e in E S e c R P R A T R uro e - v f p ( o r d w ide S we e O f t he it e i ht ro m t he C as s ic s The o nd o f t he 5 ) W l p R , L g f l B Co e nant T he it e and it s o e n in E t O t he r e ams o f t he it e . v , R T k gyp Gl R S ugg es t ions a nd Pe rv er s ions of t he R z t e S ac re dne ss o f Bl o o d and o f t he H e art ( 2 ) V iv ifyi ng Po we r o f Bl o o d A ne w N at ure t hro ugh ne w Blo o d Life fro m an o o d and a o uc h ns irat io n t hro u h o o d nt e r c o mmunio n t hr u h y , 5 ) g o g Bl by T I p Bl I ' v Blo o d S ymb o lic S ub s t it ut e s fo r Blo o d Blo o d Co ve nant In olv ing s . Indica t i ons l imit at io ns f n uir rimit i e e ac hin of t he t e in t h e B ib e . L o I q y P v T gs o f Bl o od ( 3) T he Bl o o d Co ve nant In Circ umc is io n T he Bl oo d Co ve nant Te s t e d 5 ) The Bl o o d Co ve nant and it s To k e ns i n t he Pas s o ve r T he Bl o o d Co ve nant at S inai 7 ) The Bl o o d Co ve nant In t h e M o s aic Rit ual T he Primit ive Rit e Illust rat e d T he Blo o d e m r an Co e nant in t he o s e s T he o o d Co nant a ie d . o t c e o f t his Rit e v G p—l Bl v ppl I p — S t ran e unde r a u e d i e i n t he o o d in t h e e art in t he i e r rans mi rat i n g ly l L Bl — , H , L T g o — v - f v — o f S o ul s T he Bl o o d rit e in B urmah Bl oo d s t aine d Tre e o f t he Co e nant Bl o o d — — - - m — v - drinking Co e nant Cut t ing Bl o o d barb ing Bl o o d ranso ing The Co e nant re minde r — v — — ' v H int s of Bl oo d U nio n T o pic al I nde x c ript ural I nde x . — A n admirabl e st udy o f a p rimit iv e b e lie f and c ust o m o ne o f t he ut most r h f i i i a i I import anc e in c o nside ring t he g o wt O c v l s t o n. n t he de t ails O f t he wo r wi b e o und much t o at t rac t t he at t e nt io n O f t he c rio It s k ll f u us . ndame nt a and e ss e nt ia a e ho we e r is fo r the st de nt O f re i ions and fu l l v lu , v , u l g all such wi b e rat e u t o Dr T rum fo r S S O S C E ll g f l bull , , A N D — THI LID IN TRU TIV E E O S c0t sman . NLIGHT NING W RK .

S uare I6mo Cloth ilt ed es s . q , , g g , 5 The Art of dging the Character o f Individuals FRO M

th e ir H andw riti ng and S t yl e . W P ES CO 1 2 0 S EC E S O F T HE ITH 35 LAT , NTAINING P IM N H ANDWRITING O F V ARI O US CHARACT ERS .

E E R E DIT D BY DWA D LU M LE Y.

CO S IS O F S . A rt o f ud in t he Charac t e r t he andwrit NTENT , AND L T PLATE J g g by H r m h n h : a . in no w rs t t rans at e d o t e re c nt ro duc t io n ; b . Charac t e r o f M e n ro m t he g , fi l f F I f r f ud in M e n t he ir t l u H andwrit ing ; 0 . A t O J g g by S yl e (P a t e s I t o 2 2 ) A c c o nt O f alle ge d ( A rt o f e adin t he Charac t e r o f ndi idua s In t he ir andwrit in D r . S e e r Pl a t e s R g I v l H g, by W ll 2 2 2 O n Charac t e ris t ic S i nat ure s S t e he n Co e t A . . ( Thoma s B e r le ) 3, 4, 5 ) g , by ll , M y y ’ p Pl a t es 2 6 t o 2 ) ut o ra h s , s aac D s rae i int s as t o ut o ra hs S ir ( 3 A g p by I I l H A g p , by hn S inc air Charac t e rs In rit in i ne u ar i e D om N oel D a r onne J o l W g , by V g l M v ll ( g ) ra t e r . T he ut o ra h a e s t o f Cha c , Ed ar A Po e (Pl a t es ) O f e si n A g p T by g 33, 34 D g , it in t he Re v . . Cas e r a at e r Pl a t e Co o urin and r , ( l g, W g by J p L v ’ 32 George R edway s Publicat ions .

Post v o x iii. and 2 2 0 Clot h 1 os . 6d. 8 , pp. , , The Life

hi i s T heo h as s Bo m ast o f Ho e nheim P l ppu p r tu , b h ,

K N O W N BY T H E NAM E O F

a a P r c e l s u s .

A N D T H E S UB S TAN CE O F H IS T E ACHING S CO N CE RNIN G CO S O O A O O O E O O M C M L GY, NTHR P L GY, PN UMAT L GY, AGI S O CE M E C E A C E A N D AND R RY, DI IN , L H MY A S O O O S O TR L GY , PHIL PHY T EO S AND H O PHY .

E XTRACTE D AND T RAN S LATE D FR O M H IS RAR E A N D E XTE NS IVE WO S O M S O M E U S E M S C S RK , AND FR NPUBLI H D ANU RIPT ,

BY FRA N Z H A RT MA N N M D . , .

— — — — CO N T E N T s z The Life o f Parac e sus E x anat io n o f e rms Co smo o gy nt hro o o g — — l pl — T l A— p l y Pne umat o o g agic and S o rc e r e dic ine c he m and s t ro o g Phi o so h l y—M _ y M Al y A l y l p y and The oso phy Appe ndi x .

’ S t j ames s Gaz et t e de sc rib e s this as a bo o k which will have s o me pe r ” “ manent a e t o t he st de nt o f t he o cc t and s a s t hat S E S v lu u ul , y TUD NT S O B E E FO R S O O de s it e it s se t t in o f The o so hic a H ULD GRAT FUL THI K , p g p l ” B nonsense .

S mall 8v a Whit e Clot h s , , 4 . 6d. Through the Gates of Gold

A F a me n o f T o h r g t h ug t .

B Y MA E L CO LLIN S B . — — CO S The S e arch fo r e as ure T he s t e r f h — N—TENT — Pl My y o t e Thre shol d The I nit ia l E ort T he e ani n o f Pam Th e S e c re t f r ff M g o S t e ngt h.

’ o 34 George R edway s Puhl icat i ns .

Crown 871 0 . xx iii. and 1 8 Clot h 3 . , pp v 4, , 5

The History of Tithes ,

F m aham o een V ic o ria ro A br t Q u t .

B H E N R CLA RKE . Y Y W.

— — m h hris t ian E ra CO NTEN—TS T he H is t o ry o f Tit he s—b e fore t he Christ ian E ra —Fro t e C . . t . . 8 r m . . t . . o o r m . . 1 0 00 t o A . D . t o A . . 400 Fro m 400 o A 7 7 F o 7 8 7 o m F o —D AD D AD A —D —AD m . . o t he iss ut io n f o nas t e rie s nast rie s n e udat ions 1 2 1 5 Fro AD t —D o l o M M o — e I f m a i n it he s T he is s o ut io n o f o nas t e rie s T he mmut at io n A c t E xe mp t io n fro P y gT — D l M Co — o f 1 8 6 6 and i . IV . c . 1 it he s In t he Cit and i e rt ie s o f o ndo n e de m t io n 3 , 7 W ll , 7 T y L b L R — “ p o f Tit he Re nt Charge S o me Re marks o n A D e fe nc e o f t he Churc h o f E ngland against isest a is hme nt t he E ar o f S e o rne . D bl , by l lb

A n im artia and a a e arra O f ac t s and re s whic h sho d b e re ad p l v lu bl y f figu , ul ” r n e r t d in he s o t io n o f t he t it h r m — A t h na u n by all who a e i t e s e t lu e p o bl e . e 7 . “ T H E B ES T B O O K O F MO DE RAT E S I Z E YET PUBLI S H E D fo r t he pu rpo se o f e nabling an o rdinary reade r t o t ho ro ughly unde rst and t he origin and histo ry — W l i i n i m Lit e; ar or d. o f t h s anc e t po st . y

Crown 87 m xl . and Cloth ex tra 3 . 6d. , pp. 395 , , 7

Essays in the Study of

F - olk Songs .

BY T H E CO ES S E V E L N M A RT IN E N - E RE O UNT Y G O C S A S C .

— — — CO NTENTS T he I ns irat io n o f D e at h In Fo lk Po e t ry N at ure In Fo lk S o nggs A rme nian — p - — — — F o lk S ong s Ve ne—t ian Fo lk S ongs S ic ilian Fo lk S o ngs G re e k S ongs o f Calab ria Fo lk S o n s o f ro e nc e T he hit e at e rno s t e r—T he iffus io n f a ads — S o n s for t he it e g —P W P —D o B ll— g R v - o f M a The de a o f at e In S o ut he rn radit ions o u a ie s o r e s & c y I F T F lk L ll b F lk D i g ,

The S at urda Rev iew c o nc din a a e - no t ice o f this o o s ms it as y , lu g p g b k , u up an admira e o me a o me re mar a e fo r no w e d e s m at h and bl v lu , v lu k bl k l g , y p y , ” go o d t ast e “ T S IS E E O O O F O M O HI A V RY D LIGH—TFUL B K , FULL INF R ATI N AND O S E S O S . S t andard TH UGHTFUL UGG TI N . “ The Co nt e ss is o r sho d b e a we no wn a t ho rit amon S e c ia u , ul , ll k u y g p l st de nt o f t hi ran h f it r — u s s b c o l e at ure . D aily N ews . ’ r P l t s Geo ge R edway s uh ica ion . 35

L E P E E O R o al S w . x v i. and 60 s . 6d. ARG AP R DITI N , y , pp , 7 An Essay on the Genius of

George Cruikshank .

B Y W ILLIA M MA KE PEA CE T HA CKE RA Y .

“ e r r t e tminster R e iew R p int ed Ve ha im from The W s v .

EDIT ED WITH A PR E FATO RY N O TE O N T HA CK E RAY A S A N W A S A RT C C . E. C C . RTI T AND RITI , BY HUR H

W U W S O F FO I S O S C T H E ITH P ARD RTY LLU TRATI N , IN LUDING ALL O WO O C S N E W PO O F C S RIGINAL D UT , AND A RTRAIT RUIK HANK W P E E C F . O . T H ED BY . AILTH RP

A s t he o ri ina c o O f t he Wes t minst er IS no w e x c e ssi e rare this g l py v ly , re - iss e wi n w me d r T h r i f u ll o do ubt b e e lco by c o ll e c t o s . e ne w po rt a t o

Cr i shan F W Pai t hor e is a c e ar fi rm e t chin . u k k by . . l p l g

P . 1 02 lot /z d p , C , z s . 6 .

POpe o an T H E F E M A L E P O P E ( ) ,

A Hi a st o ric l Study.

T R S L ED FRO T H E G RE E O F E UE L RHO IDIS AN AT M K MMAN , WITH PR E FACE BY

CHA RLE S HA S T IN G S CO LLE TT E .

F O S ECE E E E N E E R NTI PI TAK N FRO M T H AN CI NT MS . UR MB RG

C O C E E S E E CO O E . HR NI L , PR RV D AT L GN

The subj e ct o f Po pe J o an will al ways ha e it s at t rac t io ns fo r t he lo v e rs o f ' v t he c ri sit i O f his r RhO Idis dis c s e s t he t o ic wit h muc h e arnin and u o e s t o y . u s p l g ’ in e n it and M r e t t e In r d i n i f in o rmat i n — Globe g u y , Co ll s t o uc t o s full o f o . . ’ 6 e r e R e a Puhl cat i ns 3 G o g dw y s i o .

- m Gilt 6s . Crown 80 0 . 0 rint ed on hand made a e r Vellu , pp 4 , p p p , ,

The Bibliography of Swinburne

A B O C L S A E C O O O C IBLI GRAPHI AL I T, RRANG D IN HR N L GI AL E O F T H E S E W S V E S E O RD R , U L H D R R D P B I ITING , IN AN O S E O F A E O C E S S E PR , LG RN N HARL WINBURN ( 1 8 5 7

O n 2 0 c o ie s rint d The c o m i e r writ in o n A ri 1 88 sa s ly 5 p p e . p l , g p l 5 , 7, y ’ o rn o n A ri 1 8 in t he e ar o f e e n V ic t o ria s A c c e ssio n o f whic h B p l 5 , 37, y Q u , t he who e nat io n is no w c e e rat in t he i e e A e rnon Char e s S win rne l l b g Jub l , lg l bu t o - da at t ains t he i e e o r o th e ar o f his o wn i e and ma t here ore b e y jub l 5 y l f , y f ” im n n i x usi e V i t ria c la e d as a e ss e t ally and e c l v ly c o n po e t . I S S E T E O E S NDI PEN ABL O S WINBURN C LL CTO R .

D em 871 0 xxi and 1 0 Clot h ex t ra s 6d. y , pp. v . 4 , , 7 . The Astrologer’ s Guide A N IM A A S TR OL O GL E ( ) ,

r A ide fo r A r o e r O G s o s . , u t l g B EING

T H E O N E H UNDRE D AND FO RTY - S Ix CO N S ID E RATI O N S O F T H E F O S A S O O E G O B O N A TU S T S AM U TR L G R , UID , RAN LA 'I‘ ED O T H E L H E CO E FR M ATIN BY NRY L Y, TO GETHER W ITH T H E CH O I CES T A PH O RI S M S O F T H E S EVE N S EGM E NTS O F E O E C N O F M E E J R M ARDA ILAN , DIT D BY WILLIAM LILLY N OW FIRS T RE PUBLI S H E D FRO M A UNI Q U E CO PY O F T HE O E O N O E S P E CE RIGINAL DITI N , WITH T AND A R FA , BY

W M . C E D R . L O N S E EA N T J , E O O F T H E E O S O C S O C E F LL W TH PHI AL I TY.

M r S e rj e ant de se rv e s t he t hank s o f all who are int e re st ed in ast ro logy for re sc in t his im o rt ant w o r ro m O i io n The ro win int e re st i u g p k f bl v . g g n m st ic a scie nc e wi e ad t o a re i a o f ast ro o ic al s t d and CE y l ll l v v l l g u y, ADVAN D S TUD E NTS WILL FIND THI S O O K AN INDI S P EN S A LE ADDITI O N T O TH E IR B ”B ES The o o is w e o t and rint ed Theoso hist LIBRARI . b k ll g up p . p .

’ 8 G eor e R edwa s Puhlicat ions 3 g y .

D em 8 71 0 . x iii. and wit h Illust rat ions loth ex t ra 1 y , pp l 349 , , C , 0 s . 6d.

The Mysteries of Magic ;

A D est O f t he W in s o f Eli has Lév i ig rit g p .

WITH BI O GRAPHI CAL AND CRITI CAL ES S AY

BY A RT H U R E DWA RD WA ITE .

— — CO N N S N I I O Y E X IS S N P P IO N S R I IO US N PH ILO S O TE T I T AT R ERC —E A D RE ARAT EL—G A D — H ICA L O B M S YPO S S The e rme t ic iom ait h The rue G o d The P PR L—E AND H THE E — H Ax —, F T Chris t o f G o d s t e rie s o f t he o o s T he ru e e igio n T he e aso n o f ro di ie s o r My — L g T R l R P g , t he D e i e o re S c ie nc e S I N I I N I O M S - O n um e rs and t he ir v—l b f C E T —F C A D MAG CAL—THE RE N b irt ue s he or o f i o w e r T he rans uc id The re at a ic e nt o r t he V T y W ll P T l g M g Ag , — m—T h — Mys t e rie s o f t he A s t ra l Light M agio E quilib riu e M agic Chain The gre at M agic num—T H E O I O F S PI I U E S S S O R B B IS I UM I S W I A rc a D CT NE T ENCE , K T C PNE T C ; T R R AL A AL - A — H I S O F E V O IO O M Y K I mm rt it T H E YS N , N , N o a The M TE—R E CAT NECR A —C A D BLAC MAG C I l y t ra o d nit and S o idarit o f S irit s T he re at rc anum o f e at h o r S irit ua As l B y U y l y p —g A D , p l ans it io n ie rarc h and C ass i c at io n o f S irit s uidic hant oms and t he ir s t e rie s Tr , H y, l fi Fl P My p — — —E e me nt ar S irit s and t he Rit ua o f t he ir Co n urat io n e c ro manc s t e rie s o f t he l y p — l j N y My m and o t he r Pant ac l e s a ic a Ce re mo nia and Co nse c rat io n O f a is man P e nt agra M g l — l— T l s ic and t he S e c re t s o f t he W It c he s S a at h it c hc ra t and S e s- T he Ke Blac k M ag — — bb W f p ll y m T H E I M e s me rism M o de rn S irit ualis G E T P CT C S EC ETS O R RE IS T IO N S — p ”—R A RA AL R — AL A M A G ICA L S CIE N CE T he a num O us T he ni e rs a e dic ine e ne we d o ut h O F — —M g p— U v lM R Y t i n i inat io n s t ro o The aro t t he o o o f e rme s o r o f o t h rans o rma o s D g , k H , T f v A— l y — T B— — K und e ac e E PI O U S UPP M The a a ah T haumat ur E t e rna Li e , o r Pro o P N l f f ’ — L G E LE E T K bb—l ic al E e rie nc e s o f E li has e i E o c at io n o f o o nius O f ana ho s t s in aris g x p L — A ll Ty G P p v v p - m E li ha a h S f T he M agic ian and t h e M—e diu p s Levi nd t e e c t O E ugene V int raS The M agic ian and t he S o rc e re r S e c re t His t o ry o f t he Ass assinat ion of t he A rchbis ho p o f Paris

O f t he many remarkabl e me n who have gaine d no t o rie t yby t he ir pro fi c i ima inar in t he ac A rt s ro a no ne re se nt s a mo r e nc y re al o r y , l , p b bly p e , g B k st range and irre c o nc ile ab l e c harac t e r t han t he Fre nch magic ian A lpho nse Lo uis nt e t t e r no wn nde r t he e wish s e do n m o f Eli has Const a . B k u J p u y p ' Le i Z ahe d t his e nth siast ic s t de nt o f o r idde n art made s o me st ir in v , u u f b

Franc e and e e n in Londo n. H IS O S O N C A RE O S E O F , v W RK MAGI TH A N O E E S and di e a hi o so h e a t i in c o nc e t io n if UND UBT D G NIU , vulg p l p y b u ful p , m n s e nse rinc i e s . The re is so re at a t o t ally o ppos e d t o c o m o p pl g fund f e arnin and o f at t rac t i e re as o nin in t he se w rit in s t hat Mr A rth r o l g v g g , u Edward Wait e has publishe d a dige st O f t he m fo r t he be ne fit o f E nglish T his e nt e man has no t at t e m t e d a it e ra t rans at ion in e e r re ade rs . g l p l l l v y case b ut has arran e d a o me which whi e re ro d c in With s ufii c ie nt , g v lu , l p u g a reat o rt io n O f t he mo re int e re st in wo r s af o rds an e xc e e nt acc u rac y g p g k , f ll ide a o f t he s c o p e o f t he e nt ire lit e rary re mains O f an e nt husiast fo r who m he i at i he r ad r ma i ro t r ent e rt ains a pro fo und adm r o n. T e e y w th p fi p e use i n n h H r c are fully t he le arne d disse rt at o ns p e nne d by M . Co st a t upo n t e e me t ic

art t re at e d as a re i ion a hi o so h and a nat ra sc ie nc e . In ie w l g , p l p y, u l v i me me ric in e nc e and t ho ht re adin O f t he re markable e xhibit o ns o f s flu ug g which ha e e e n re c e nt i e n it is no t im ro a e t hat t he t ho ht v b ly g v , p b bl ug ful re ade r may fi nd a c lue in t he writ ings o f t his c ult ure d and amiable magic ian mani a i n f wi h r ha o rme r s t r c t o t he se c re t o f many of t he fe s t t o s o t c c aft t t f ly u k im e o - The M ornin wo nde r and t erro r int o t he he arts o f s pl f lks . g

Post . ’ r Geo g e Redway s Puhlicat ions . 39

The pre se nt singl e vo lume is a dige st o f half- a- doz e n bo o ks e nume rat e d ‘ ’ by t he pre se nt aut ho r in a bio graphic al and c rit ic al e ssay with whic h h i n r a in T he se are t he D o /no et R it ual d l t e pre fac e s h s u de t k g. g e a H au e M a ic t he Hist oire de la M a i e t he Cl des Grands Al st éres h g , g , ef y , t e ’ S orcier de M endon t he Rhiloso hie Oc cul e and the S cie nce a s s r , p t , e E p it s . T o at t ac the Who e se rie s— which inde e d it mi ht b e dif c t t o O t ain k l , , g fi ul b no w in a c o m e t e o rm— wo u d b e a o d nde rt a in b ut M r Wait e pl f l b l u k g, has e nde av o u re d t o give his re ade rs t he e sse nc e o f t he Who l e six b o ok s in a m T H E O O E O E US 1 3 E E re lat ive ly c o mpac t c o pass . B K B F R N CYCLO P DI C IN IT S A E and it wo d b e dif c t t o fi nd a sin e o me which is e t t e r R NG , ul fi ul gl v lu b c al c ulat e d t o supply mo de rn inquirie s with a ge ne ral c o nc e pt io n o f t he sc o pe and r ose o f t he o c c u t s cie nc e s at ar e . It re e hand e s amon s t pu p l l g f ly l , g O t he rs t he hast t o ics O f wit chc ra t and ac ma ic b ut c e rt ain , g ly p f bl k g , ly it w o uld b e diffic ult t o imagine any re ade r t e mpt e d t o e nt e r t ho se pat hways o f e x pe rime nt by t he pic t ure o f t he ir c haract e r and pu rpo se t hat Eliphas Lé vi su ie s . In t his wa t he int re id o ld Ka a ist t ho h ne e r t ro in his ppl y p bb l , ug v ubl g re ade rs with s ime e xho rt at io ns in t he int e re st s O f irt e writ e s nde r t he ubl v u , u ins irat io n O f an nc om ro misin de o t io n t o t he o t ie st ide a s and all his p u p g l f l , v’ — hi oso h ma e s fo r ri ht e o sne ss . M r A . P. S inne t t in L i ht p l p y k g u g . We are rat e t o M r Wait e fo r t rans at in t he ac c o nt of ho w Lé vi in g ful l g u , a o ne cham e r in Lo ndon c a e d t he s irit o f A o oni s o f T ana l b , ll up p p ll u y . This v e ry c re e py c o mpo sit io n is writ t e n in quit e t he fi ne st manne r O f t he lat e ” Lo rd L h n he as disco rsin on t h o — T/z S at urda yt t o n W e w u g up e c c ult . e y

Rev iew.

D em 1 8mo . v i. and 1 2 with Woodcut s Fanc Clot h y , pp 3 , , y , 1 s . A Leech , rtist

Humourist .

A Bio a h a gr p i c l Ske tch.

BY FRE D . G . KITTO N .

ew E dit i n Rv ised N o , e .

In t he a se nc e o f a e r io ra h ’ b full b g p y we c o rdially we l come Mr Kit to n s ”— int e re st in it t e s e t ch. N ot es and ueries g l l k Q . “ The m t it dino s admire rs o f t he am ul u u f o us art is t will fi nd t his t ouching ” ra h e worth c ar in — mo no w e re ad and re ser at io n. D ail Chronicle g p ll ful g p v y . T H E E O E O F S C A E O S O B E V RY M D L WHAT U H M M IR H ULD . ’ G eor e R edwa P hl z cat z n 40 g y s u o s .

t o wit h Front is iece . xx x . and 1 Parchment 1 0s d 4 , p , pp 5 4, , . 6 .

M TH E H E R E Tf C WOR K S . The V irgin of the World

Hermes Mercurius Trismegistus .

N O W S RE E E O E S E S S FIR T ND R D INT NGLI H , WITH AY, I O O N E R DUC S , D O S NT TI N AN T ,

BY D R A N N A KIN G S FO RD E DWA RD MA IT LA N D AND , “ ” O S O F T H E E E C AUTH R P RF T WAY .

“ a i f h H rm t i i a n h Publishe d unde r t he us p c e s o t e e e c S o c e t y . E ss ys o T e ” “ M and o n Th H e rm i m nd h H e rme t ic o o s E . . e e t c S st e a t e B k , by , y ” ” S i ni c anc e O f it s Pre se nt Re i a A . K . The V ir in o f t he W o r d g fi v v l , by g l “ ” “ is o ow e d A s c e io s o n Init iat io n t he D e nit io ns o f A sc e io s f ll by l p , fi l p , ” and t he Fragme nt s o f H e rme s . “ It will b e a mo st int e re st ing st udy fo r e v e ry o c c ult is t t o c o mpare t he do ct rine s o f t he anc ie nt H e rme t ic philo s o phy With t he t e aching o f t he s m o f r i io s t ho ht T H E O S O O S V e dant ic and Buddhis t s y t e s e l g u ug . FAM U B K O F H E E S s e e m t o o c c wit h re e re nc e t o t he E t ian re i io n t he RM upy, f gyp l g , ” am o sit io n which t he U anishads o c c in A r an re i io s it e rat re s e p p upy y l g u l u . 7 heoso hist N o e m e r 1 88 p , v b , 5

’ - r r ri t ed n What man s hand made a er . Im erial 1 6mo . 1 6 w a e n o p , pp , pp , p p p

2 0 co ies onl each nu rnhe red s . 5 p y , . 5

N a A Word for the vy .

L RN N HA RLE W IN RN B Y A G E O C S S BU E .

’ ’ Mr S win rne s ne w at rio t ic son A Wo rd fo r t he N a is as e r bu p g, vy, fi y in it s de nunciat io n o f t hose he be lie v e s t o b e ant ago nist ic t o t he we l fare o f t he c o unt ry as was his lyric with whic h he s t art l e d t he re ade rs of t he Times o ne — t henceu7n . mo rning. A

The publisher of t his poem is also t he sole propriet or of t he copy right ; it cannot ’ e re be included in M r S winburne s collected worhs t her fo .

’ 2 G eor e R 4 g edway s Publicat ions .

’ Crown 8v o . 6 rint ed on Whatman s H andmade Pa er Vellum Gilt 6s . , pp 5 , p p , , Hints to Collectors

O f O riginal Editio ns o f t he Wo rks o f

Charl es Dickens.

BY CHA RLE P M PTR H N N S LU E J O S O .

Inc din o o s P a s and Po rt rait s t he re are 1 6 it ems descri ed. lu g B k , l y , , 7 fully b

This is a s ist e r vo lume t o the Hint s t o Co ll e c t o rs O f First Edit io ns o f ’ Thac era which w e no t ic e d a mo nt h o r t wo a o . A s we are na e k y , g u bl t o de t e c t an s i s in his wor we m st c o nt e nt o rse e s it h t han in y l p k , u u lv W k g n a i n I i nn r a ur him for the co rre c t ne ss o f his an o t t o s . t s u e c e ssary t o e p e t o — rais O f h e an rmat o f the se o o s . A cadem p e t e e l g t fo b k y .

’ Crown 8vo 8 rint ed n What man s Handmade Pa er Ve llum Gilt 6s . , pp. 4 , p o p , , Hints to Collectors

O riginal E dit io ns o f t he Wo rks o f William

M akepe ace T hacke ray .

E M PT R H N O N BY CHA RL S PLU E J O S .

A uide t o t hose who are re at admire rs o f T hac e ra and are g g k y, t in rst e dit io ns of his wo r s . The daint it t e o me o nd c o ll e c g fi k y l l v lu , b u in archme nt and rint e d o n hand - made a e r is e r c o nc ise and c o n e nie nt p p p p , v y v in fo rm ; o n e ach page is an e xac t c o py o f t he t it le - page O f t he wo rk n d t he re o n a c o at io n o f a e s and i st rat io ns se hint s o n t he me nt io e , ll p g llu , u ful

dif e re nc e s in e dit io ns wit h o the r mat t e rs S E S E TO CO E C O S . f , INDI P N A L LL T R B ” nd x e rie n A lt oge the r it re pre se nt s a large amo unt o f labo ur a e p c e . t a r S pec t o . ’ u Georg e R edway s P blicat ions . 43

Lar e Crown 8v a . xx xn. and 2 Cloth ex t ra Gilt To 1 0s . 6d. g , pp 3 4, , p,

S e a and Song River Rhyme ,

m ha e r t o T e nn o n Fro C uc ys . S ELECTE D A N D E DITE D BY

E S T E LLE DAV E N PO RT A DA M S .

H N EW P E A E O E WIT A O M BY LG RN N CHARL S S WINBURN E .

T E E E S WITH W LV TCHING .

In e nera t he o n s and Po e t ic a E xt rac t s are imit ed t o t ho se hi h g l , S g l l w c de a with t he S e a and Ri e rs as nat ra O e c t s and are e ither de sc ri t i e o r l v u l bj , p v i Th E chin s ar rint d in diff r refle c t ve . e t g e p e e e nt c o lo urs t he he adpie c e s are i al so o r ginal .

The o o is o n t he who e one o t he best its hind ever ublished. b k , l , f of p Glasgow “ h dit r ha mad h s e e i n i h T e e o s e t e l c t o w t h prais ewo rt y judgment . M orning Post . T we lve re ally e x quisit e and de lic at e ly e x e c ut e d e t chings o f se a and ri e r ”— v ide ac c o m an and o m e t e S E M E M ornin Pos t . s p y c pl THI B AUTIFUL VO LU . g A S e c ia ant ho o de i ht in it s e and o sse ssin the adde d rac e s p l l gy, l g ful lf, p g g ” an rint in an i i s t rat i — S t ma o f e l e g t p g d da nt y llu o ns . co s n. “ The o me is o t in t he hands ome s t st e and inc des a do z e n v lu g up yl , lu ” e t chin s Of se a and ri e r sce ne s s ome o f which are e x isit e —Lit erar g v , qu . y

Crown 8 vo x l . and 2 0 lot h ex t ra 1 0s . 6d , pp. 4 , C , .

The History of the Forty V ez irs ;

O r T he o r O f t he Fo r M o ms and E v es. , St y ty

WRITTE N IN T URKI S H BY S H E YKH - Z A DA D O E O E L S H Y E . . W . G I N INT NG I B J BB ,

The c e e rat e d T r ish ro manc e t rans at ed rom a rint e d b ut ndat ed l b u k , l f p u x r r t e t p oc u e d a fe w ye ars ago in Co nst ant ino ple .

A delight ful addit io n t o the we alt h o f O rie nt al st o rie s avail abl e t o En ish r ad r M i has c o nside rat e do r hin o h gl e e s . r G bb ly ne e ve yt g t e lp ” t he re ade r t o an int i n a r iat io n f ell ge t pp e c O THI S CHARMING B O O K . S at urday Rev iew . S IR R C F O sa s In m o inion t he e rsio n is de nit e I HARD . BURT N y y p , v fi

and na . The s t e is i ht and e asant With t h ab o t e ne c ssar fi l yl l g pl , e s lu ly e y a o r o f aint ne ss and t he no t e s t ho h short and fe w are s ufii c ie nt and fl v u qu , ug , ” sat is fac t o ry . ’ 44 G eorg e R edway s Publicat ions .

m let o Co p e in 1 2 V ls . £3 net t . The Antiqu arian Mag az ine and

a Bibliogr pher .

E DITED BY

D A RD A L R . . W. RE DWA E W W F O D M . A G , AND Y,

T his i s t rat e d e rio dic a hi h e s t e e me d s t dent s O f E n ish llu p l , g ly by u gl ant i it ie s io ra h o o re i io ra h n mismat ics ene a o qu , b g p y , f lk l , b bl g p y, u , g l gy, &c . w as o nde d i n 1 88 2 M r Edward Wa rd and o m i , f u by lfo , c pl et e d n 1 88 nde r t he e dit o rshi O f Mr W d E Re wa . S O 7 u p G . . y O NLY M THIRTY

CO E E S E S E M and t he are o fe re d at a e r mo de rat e ric e . MPL T T R AIN , y f v y p

— — ‘ CO S O F . X I X II. o me sda o o Fro s t iana S o me e nt ish NTENT VO S . ND D y B k K - L A Pro e rb s T he Lit e rat ure o f Almanac ks M adc a H arry and S ir J o hn Po ham v — p ’ p o rn Co r at e and his Crudit ie s o t e s o n J ohn Wi ke s and o s we s Li e o f J ohns o n T y — N l B ll f— T he i e ne s s o f Chris t T he i e ime s and rit in s o f ho mas u e r S o c ie t in t he L k L , T , W g T F ll y — f — — E iz a e t han A ge Cha t e rs ro m Fami y Che s t s Co e c t io n o f Paro die s Rarit ie s in l b p f — ly ll — t he Lo c ke r Lampso n Co lle c t io n A D ay wit h t he lat e M r E dward 30 11y T he D e e nc e p — ’ f o f E ng and in t he 1 6t h Ce nt ur T he O rdinar ro m M r ho mas J e ny n s o o ke l — y — y f T B me s r n e rie i t h e o f A r A Fo ggo t t e n Cromw e llian To mb Visit at io n o f t he M o as t s n e R ign — — - — man o f H e nry t he E ight h T he Ros ic ruc ians The S e illie re Lib rary A Lo s t Work Ro c e s o f Chi a r — nc ie nt e e nds s t ic Charms and S u e rs t it io ns o f re and—The A rt o f l y A L g , My , I l v — p — t he O ld E ngl ish Po t t e r T he S t ory o f t he S anis h A rmada B o ok s fo r a R e e re nc e Lib rary — - — — p f t h Land S ir e is o f H ampt o n Cro mw e and t he S add e Le t t e r o f Char e s I My B v — p ll — l l —Re c e nt Disc o e rie s at R o me Fo lk Lore o f B rit is h B irds A n O ld Po lit ic al —Broads Ide v — — - o t e s f re m ir N o r Co in Co lle c t o rs H igham Prio ry By Ways o f Pe rio dic al Lit e rat u M e o o f Ca t ain a t o n—A is t o r o f t he arish o f o rt a e In t he Co unt o f S urre D H P k , p l— — y M l y — y H is t o ric Tow ns E x e t e r Trait s and S t o rie s O f Ye O l de Che shire Che e s e The Pre is t o r f t he rt h—Th m c o n e rnin ie rs t he o wman—T he H y o N —o e Vis io n o f Willia c —g P Pl Curio s it ie s o f A le T he B o o k s and B oo kme n o f Re ading Ho w t o t rac e a Pe digre e T he an ua e o f t he Law— o rds dio ms & c o f t he u ar— T he o mans in L —g g —W , I , ,, V —lg R — Cumb ria The S t udy o f Co ins A n U mb o wdle ris e d B o c c acc io The Kabbal ah The — — - H o us e o f dus o o ks e ing in Lit t e rit ain Co e r at e s and Wo o dcut s t he — Al B ll — l B pp— pl b—y B e wic k s E xc a at io ns at O s t ia S ir S age s of S o me rs e t T he o o d ue e n e rt ha The v — — G Q B o u ar D rama o f t he Pas t R e ics o f s t ro o gi c dio ms A Le a ro m an O ld c c o unt p p l— —l A l —I ff A manc f a t n r r hurs c ro ss o r s hire Bo o k The Ro e o Gibbe G—e e alPardo ns T ho rsc ro ss o T (Y k ) T he e ne s is o f In e mo riam T he nflue nc e o f t a ian u o n E ng is h Li t e rat ure G M — I I l p —l T he Trade S igns o f E s s e x T he A nc ie nt Cit ie s o f t he N e w Wo rld The Le ge ndary — — His t o ry o f t he Cro s s H is t o ry o f Runc o rn T he R os ic ruc ians ; t he ir Rit e s and My s t e rie s O ld as o w ami ie s—T he o use o f dus— e r in t he ro he t O f t he Ce t s—A Gl g F l — H Al — M l , P p — l ac e t io us A d e rt ise me nt F une ral Garl ands B oo k s e lling o n Lo ndo n B ridge M ill o m f —v ’ — um e r and A o r o t t e n Chi dre n s f h r e ns The o t hs hi d a C b l f g —l B o o k o C a l e—s Dic k R c l s ; ri o O f t he i e t o c o me T he e e r Of t he i e S t o r O f t he rama In E e t e r T l gy L —B B bl y D x - f — Wa o f e ri di a it e r t ure e adin ne d s nn s o nian and hac e ra an By y—5 P o c l L a R g A c o—t e Te y T k y Rarit ie s The O rigin and H is t o r o f Change Ringing o re u gar Wo rds and Phrase s y— M V l — T he po pu ar D rama o f t he as t S o me Po e ms at t ri ut e d t o ro n T he arriage o f l — p — b By M Cupid an—d Ps y Che S k e t c he s o f Li—fe In J apan T he fi rs t nine y e a—rs o f t he B ank o f E n and he runswic c c e s sio n is t r f t he Bass and ne i e e c u iar Co urt s gl T yB — k A — H o y o y B bl— P l Vulgar E t ymo lo gie s N ure mb urg M e t al Pan making in E ng land T he Pe ws O f t he as t —O c t o c e nt e nar o f t he e at h o f i iam t he Con ue ro r—A ac a ic ian—The P y D W ll —q Bl k M g — e go rica S ignifi c at io n O f t he inc t ure s In H e ra dr T he P ur o s e o f t he A ge s The All l — T l—y p S ie ge s o f Po nt e rac t Cast e A Li e o f ohn Co e t T he His t or o f S o rt In Che shire f l —f J l y p — T o m Co r at and his Crudit ie s T he aro t : an nt i ue e t ho d o f D i inat io n Law —y — T A— q — M v — Fre nc h T he Pe w s O f t he Pas t S hro shire Fo lk Lo re T he Print e d o o k S t ar — p ’ B —M y O v e rie s rio r Church S o ut hwar S o me c urio us as s a e s ro m a e r s Chro nic e The P y , — k g B k l - p- f re s t in ac e of Cro mwe A i rar f rit ie s E ur e in t he re i n o f ame s t he —g pl ll L b y o R a — o p g J S i t h M t hs S c e ne s and o rt hie s o f S o me rs e t e re o rdshire o rds and hras e s x y , , —W — H f W — P Chro nic l e s o f an O ld Inn Epira hs T he Gno s t ic s and t he ir R e mains Co lle c t ane a - p — — M e e t ings o f Le a rne d S o c ie t ie s N e ws and N ot e s O bit uary M e moirs Co rre s ponde nc e V e u o s Vale t e t Pla dit e .

’ 46 George R edway s Publicat ions .

D em 8 v o . iii. and 68 Parchment s . 6d. y , pp v , , 7 Primitive Symbolism as

Illustrated in Phallic Worship ;

O r T he R e o d ct iv e in i e . , pr u Pr c pl

D D E R M WE TR FF. BY H O . S O

E E WITH AN INTR O DU CTI O N BY G N RAL FO RL O NG.

This wor is a mult um in arv o O f t he ro wt h and s re ad o f Pha ic ism k p g p ll ,

mo n c a t he w o rshi o f nat re o r e rt i iz in o w e rs . I e t whe n as w e c o m ly ll p u f l g p f l , so licit e d t o e nl arge and illus t rat e it o n t he sudde n de ath O f t he lame nt e d h r t hat it wo d b e de se c rat io n t o t o ch s o c o m e t e a c o m e ndi m aut o , ul u pl p u by O N E O F T H E M O S T CO MPE TE NT A N D S O UND ES T THINKE RS WH O HAV E - E N o ne ne w t e r o r saw m r WRITTE N O N THI S WO RLD WID FAITH . k be t o e c l e arly t han M r We s t rO pp t hat in t his o lde st symb o lism and wo rship lay t he — ll h d st e ms w e c a Re i io ns G . R . F O O . fo undat io ns o f a t e go o ly sy ll l g . J . RL NG “ w e - s e e c t e d re e rt o r O f ac t s i st rat in t his s e c t which sho d A ll l p y f llu g ubj , ul ” d in h d f h r h i i b e re ad by all who are int e re st e t e s t u y o t e g o wt O f re l g o ns .

Wes t minst e r Rev iew .

F ca 8v a 80 . Vellum 1 05 . 6d. p. , pp , ,

Be auty and the Be ast ;

a Ro h O side W i h a G e n e H eart . Or , ug ut t tl

E A PO M .

Y B CHA RLE S LA MB .

N O W S RE E O T H E O E O O F 1 8 1 1 FIR T PRINT D FR M RIGINAL DITI N , P E CE N O ES R C H E E S E E WITH R FA AND T BY I HARD RN H PH RD .

’ Fo r t hre e quart ers o f a c e nt ury t his Charming fragme nt O f Lamb s ge nius la rie d e e n t he a t hor se e ms t o ha e or o t t e n it s e xis t enc e sinc e y bu ; v u v f g , ’ we fi nd no re e re nc e e it he r dire c t o r indire c t t o t h it t t i f , , e l l e ale n Lamb s ishe d c o rre s o nde nc e o r in an o f t he Lam o o s The c re dit O f a publ p , y b b k . disc o ve ry highly int e re st ing t o all l o v e rs o f Charl e s Lamb is due t o t he ind st r and s a ac it o f Mr ohn Pe arso n o rme r O f 1 Yo r S t re e t u y g y J , f ly 5 k , rd n Co ve nt G a e . T he publishe r has no w e nde avo ure d t o plac e t he bo okl e t be yo nd fut ure chanc e o f l o ss by re producing O N E HUNDRE D CO PI ES fo r t he use o f libraries and co ll e ct o rs . ’ e r e R edwa ub t G o g y s P lica ions . 47

. xx i. and 1 Clot h ex t ra 2 s . pp v 74, ,

Wellerisms , ” “ Fro m Pickwi ck and M aste r H umphre y s C o c l k .

S E EC E CHA RLE S F . RIDE A L L T D BY ,

D E I O C O CHA RLE S KE N T . A N ED D , W H R DU Y IT IT AN NT TI N , B

' ’ — - mo ng t he Co nt e nt s are S am We e r s nt ro duc t io n O ld We e r at D o c t o r s Co mmo ns A — ll — I — ’ ll — S am o n a Le ga Case S e - ac t ing Ink O ut wit h It S am s O ld Whit e H at nde e nde nt — l ’ lf— — —I p ’ Vo t e rs Proud O t he Tit l e T he We ll e r Phil o so hy T he Tw o e nny Ro e J o b Tro t t e r s — ’ — p p p — e ars S am s M isgiv ings as t o M r Pic kw ic k C e ar t he Way fo r t he Whe e arro w Un ac k T — l — — lb p ing t he Lunc h H am e r at t e do re and S hut t e co c k A ru e Lo ndo ne r S o i ing t he e ad e — ' p B l — l — T p—l B l O ld We e r s R e me d fo r t he o ut S am o n Ca s Po e rt and O st e rs O ld We e r o n — ll ’ y —G b — v y y ll Pike s S am s Po w e r o f S uc t io n e e r and ammo n S am as as t e r o f t he Ce re monie s — ’ V ll G M — S am b e o re M r N upkins S am s I nt ro duc t io n t o M ary and t he Co o k S o me t hingbe hind t he — f — — D o o r S am and as t e r arde o od Wishe s t o e s srs D o dso n Fogg S am and his M B l'l G — M - — — o t he r- in Law T he S he he rd s W at e r R at e s S t iggins as an rit hme t ic ian S am and t he M — p — A’ — Fat B oy Co m ac t and Co m o rt a e o o gue o f t he Fat an s Wat c h e dic a S t ude nt s — p — f bl Ap l M— ’M l — S am S u oe nae d Dis a e aranc e o f t he S ausage ak e r S am We e r s a e nt ine O ld ’ bp — pp — M ’ ll V l — ’ We e r s P o t T e a D rinking at ric k Lane T he S o die r s E ide nc e nadmiss i e S am s ll l — B ! — l —v I bl Wis io n Limit e d A Frie nd S w arr T he Kille b e at e S am and t he S ur roo m ’ —ly y — ly G - — M r Pic kwic k s D arkLant e rn The Lit t l e D irt y ac e d M an O ld We lle r I ne xo rable Away — — f — ’ — ’ wit h M e l anc ho ly Pos t B o ys and D o nke ys A Ve sse l O ld We ll e r s Thre at S am s Dis ” ’ — — — - mis sal o f t he Fat Bo y Is s he a Widde r 7 B ill Blinde r s R e que st T he Wat c h b ox Bo y .

H ES S S o f t he immo rt a am a T E B T AYING l S nd his S po rt ive pare nt T he o o ma b e t a e n fo r a mi t i are c o ll e c t e d he re . b k y k up fe w nu e s w t h t he ” rt aint o f a fo rdin am se me nt and it c an b e c arried awa in he t c e y f g u , y t po c e . — k Literary World. It was a e ry goo d idea t he e xt rac t s are e ry numero us v — v i mis d Glas ow H erald. not hing s se . g

em 8vo . wit h Prot ract or and 1 6 lat es coloured and lain D y , pp 99, p , p . Clot h ilt s 6d g , 7 . .

Geometric al Psychology ;

O r T he ie nce o f Re e se n a o n . , Sc pr t ti

A N A BS TRA CT O F TH E T H EO RI ES AND DIAGRAM S O F W E S . B . . B TT

A CO K . BY LO U IS S . O

a n mi ir i His at t empt s e e ms t o hav e t ke a si l ar d e c t o n t o t hat o f G e o rge ’ o o e in o ic wit h t he di fe re nc e t hat whe re as o o e s e x re ssion o f t he B l l g , f , B l p ’ L ws of Thou ht is a e raic e t t s e x re sse s mind- rowt h e omet ric a a g lg b , B p g g lly ; ’ 8 Geor e R edwa s Publicat ns 4 g y io .

t hat Is t o sa his ro wt h o rm ae are e x re ssed In n me ric a s e rie s o f whic h y , g f ul p u l , a an b i r d h i a rr s n i Whe n he s rie s e ch c e p c t u e t o t e eye n c o e po d ng c urve . t e are t h s re re se nt e d t he w e o nd t o res e m e t he o rms o f ea es and u p , y f u bl f l v ” — ” flowe rs . M a7 B oole in S mbolic M et hods o S t ud . y , y f y The Pall M all Gaz et t e in a c harac t e rist ic art ic e e nt it e d V e r M e t ho di , l l , y ” “ c al Madne ss a o ws t hat Li e Ro sicr c ianis m e so t e ric ddhism and , ll k u , Bu , o t he r o rms o f t he m st ica incom re he nsi e it s e e ms t o e xe rc ise a f y lly p bl , magne t ic influe nce upo n many minds by no me ans as fo o lish as it s o riginal ’ in e nt o r s v . ’ This wo rk Is t he re sult O f mo re t han t we nt y ye ars applic at ion t o t he dis c o ve ry o f a me t hod o f re pre se nt ing human c onsc io us ne s s in i t s v aI i ouS s t age s o f de e o me nt me ans o f eo me t ric a re s it is i n ac t T H E C O v l p by g l figu , f , APPLI ATI N O F E S T E S hi ide a i b ne w MATH MATI CAL YMBO LO GY O M TAPHYS I C . T s w ll e t o man O f o ur re ade rs inde e d so far as we no w M r e t t s is t he o n y ; , k , B ly man who has t rie d t o wo r o ut a c ohe re nt s st e m o f t his ind t ho h his k y k , ug ” wo r n o rt nat e re mains im e r e c t . Theoso hist ne 1 88 . k u f u ly p f p , Ju 7

8vo 2 Wra er Is . , pp. 3 , pp ,

O n M e s m e r i s m .

BY A . P. S IN N E TT .

Iss e d as a Transact ion O f t he Londo n Lo d e o f t he The o so hic a S oc ie t u g p l y , O f whic h M r S inne t t is Pre side nt t his am h e t o rms A N E , p p l f ADMIRABL d i m INTRO DUCTI O N t o t he s t u y o f M e sme r s .

R E RE D WA . LO N DO N : GE O G Y