DOCSLIB.ORG

Rayli Ulaşim Sistemleri Sektör Analizi

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rayli Ulaşim Sistemleri Sektör Analizi 2018 RAYLI ULAŞIM SİSTEMLERİ SEKTÖR ANALİZİ 2018 DR. İLHAMİ PEKTAŞ 22.07.2019 RAYLI ULAŞIM SİSTEMLERİ SEKTÖR ANALİZİ 2018 İÇİNDEKİLER TABLOLAR LİSTESİ ............................................................................................................................................ 4 ŞEKİLLER LİSTESİ ............................................................................................................................................... 5 1. GİRİŞ ............................................................................................................................................................. 6 2. DÜNYADA RAYLI SİSTEMLER SEKTÖRÜ ......................................................................................................... 8 2.1. Dünya Raylı Sistemler Pazarı ve Yatırımlar ............................................................................................ 8 2.2. Raylı Sistemler Sektörü (Yolcu) ............................................................................................................ 15 2.3. Raylı Sistemler Sektörü (Yük) .............................................................................................................. 19 3. TÜRKİYE’DE RAYLI SİSTEMLER SEKTÖRÜ ..................................................................................................... 21 3.1. Osmanlı Döneminde Demiryolu ( 1856-1923) ...................................................................................... 22 3.2. Cumhuriyet Döneminde Demiryolu (1923-1950) ................................................................................. 22 3.3. 1950-2002 Döneminde Demiryolu ....................................................................................................... 24 3.4. 2002-2018 Döneminde Demiryolu ...................................................................................................... 24 3.4.1. 2012-2018 Yılları Arasında Demiryolları Projeleri ......................................................................... 28 3.4.1.1. Tamamlanan ve Devam eden Önemli Projeler ...................................................................... 28 3.4.1.2. Tamamlanan Yüksek Hızlı Tren Hatları .................................................................................. 28 3.4.1.3. Yapımı Devam Eden Yüksek Hızlı Tren Projeleri..................................................................... 29 3.4.1.4. Proje Aşamasında Hızlı Tren Hatları ...................................................................................... 30 3.4.1.5. Proje Çalışması Devam Eden Diğer Hızlı Tren Hatları ............................................................. 31 3.4.2. Sinyalizasyon ve Elektrifikasyon Yapım Projeleri .......................................................................... 32 3.4.2.1 Konvansiyonel Hatlarda Yapımı Biten ve Devam Eden Elektrifikasyon ve Sinyalizasyon Projeleri ............................................................................................................................................. 32 3.5. Türkiye’de Şehir içi Raylı Sistemler Sektörü ......................................................................................... 33 3.5.1. İstanbul Metro (1987-2030) ......................................................................................................... 34 3.5.2. Ankara Metrosu (1990-2018) ....................................................................................................... 38 3.5.3. İzmir Metrosu (1990-2018) ........................................................................................................... 40 3.5.4. Bursa Metrosu (1998-2018) ......................................................................................................... 42 3.5.5. Adana Metrosu (1998-2018) ........................................................................................................ 43 3.5.6. Eskişehir Raylı Sistem Hattı .......................................................................................................... 43 3.5.7. Kayseri Raylı Sistem Hattı ............................................................................................................. 44 3.5.8. Gaziantep Raylı Sistem Hattı ........................................................................................................ 45 3.5.9. Samsun Raylı Sistem Hattı ............................................................................................................ 46 3.5.10. Antalya Raylı Sistem Hattı .......................................................................................................... 47 3.5.11. Konya Raylı Sistem Hattı ............................................................................................................ 47 3.5.12. Kocaeli Raylı Sistem Hattı ........................................................................................................... 48 3.6. Şehiriçi Raylı Sistemlerde Yolculuk Oranları ........................................................................................ 49 3.7. Raylı Sistem Planlanan Diğer Şehirlerimiz ............................................................................................ 49 3.7.1. Mersin Raylı Sistem Hattı ............................................................................................................. 49 3.7.2. Diyarbakır Raylı Sistem Hattı ........................................................................................................ 50 1 RAYLI ULAŞIM SİSTEMLERİ SEKTÖR ANALİZİ 2018 3.7.3. Erzurum Raylı Sistem Hattı ........................................................................................................... 50 3.7.4. Erzincan Raylı Sistem Hattı ........................................................................................................... 50 3.8. TCDD ve Yerel Yönetim İşbirliği ile Yapılan Raylı Toplu Taşıma Projeleri .............................................. 51 3.8.1. Marmaray .................................................................................................................................... 51 3.8.2. Başkent Ray.................................................................................................................................. 52 3.8.3. Gazi Ray ....................................................................................................................................... 52 3.8.4. Egeray / İzban .............................................................................................................................. 52 3.8.5. Adapazarı ..................................................................................................................................... 53 3.8.6. Balray / Balıkesir ......................................................................................................................... 53 4. TÜRKİYE’DE RAYLI SİSTEMLERDE HİZMET VEREN ARAÇLAR ve MENŞEİ ...................................................... 53 4.1. Demiryollarında Çeken-Çekilen Araçlar ............................................................................................... 53 4.2. Şehir İçi Raylı Sistem Araçları .............................................................................................................. 54 4.2.1. İstanbul Metro ve Tramvay Hatlarında Hizmet Veren Araçlar ve Menşei ..................................... 55 4.2.2. Ankara Metro Hatlarında Hizmet Veren Araçlar ve Menşei .......................................................... 56 4.2.3. Bursa Raylı Sistem Hatlarında Hizmet Veren Araçlar ve Menşei ................................................... 56 4.2.4. İzmir Metro ve Banliyö Hatlarında Hizmet Veren Araçlar ve Menşei ............................................ 56 4.2.5. Diğer Şehirlerimizde Hizmet Veren Araçlar ve Menşei .................................................................. 57 4.2.6. Raylı Sistem Planlaması Yapılan Diğer Şehirlerimiz ....................................................................... 57 5. YERLİ VE MİLLİ MARKA PROJELER ............................................................................................................... 57 5.1. Yerli ve Milli Marka Tren Projeleri ....................................................................................................... 57 5.2. Yerli ve Milli Marka Şehir İçi Raylı Sistem Araçları ............................................................................... 61 5.3. Milli Sinyalizasyon Projesi ................................................................................................................... 63 5.4. Türkiye’nin Raylı Sistemler Araç İhtiyacı .............................................................................................. 63 6. RAYLI SİSTEMLERDE İHRACAT VE İTHALAT .................................................................................................. 64 6.1. Raylı Sistemlerde Toplam İhracat ve İthalat Değerleri (2009-2018) ..................................................... 65 6.2. Türkiye’de Bazı ARUS Üyesi Firmaların İhracat Değerleri (2012-2017) ................................................. 66 6.3. Türkiye’de Raylı Ulaşım Sektöründeki Şirketlerimizin Yurt Dışı Altyapı, İnşaat ve Hizmet İhracat Değerleri (2012-2018) ................................................................................................................................ 67 7. RAYLI SİSTEMLER SEKTÖRÜNÜN GELİŞİMİ VE SEKTÖR İLE İLGİLİ BEKLENTİLER ............................................ 70 7.1. Belgelendirme ....................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • OZEL EK 2019 Ingilizce 4.Pdf
    "[NBTSBGM ÎPLTFÎFOFLMJ .FSDFEFT#FO[&VSP LBNZPOBJMFTJ Mercedes-#FO[&VSPBSBmMBS EÜLCBLÎNNBMJZFUJZMFDFCJOJ[JZPSNB[ EBIBV[VOCBLÎNBSBMÎLMBSÎZMBJÜUFOBMÎLPZNB[ TEKBOR “Hayat Taşır” Telefon: +90(412) 456 6052 • Mail: [email protected] • Fax: +90(412) 456 6085 Adres: Bismil Diyarbakr Yolu 8.Km Bismil/DùYARBAKIR www.tekbor.com.tr Bu bir güç gösterisi. Yeni X-Class V6. 258 BG ve 550 Nm torka sahip V6 turbo motoruyla şimdi yollarda. BaķWan Sona (WNLle\LFL: ZF’den KomponenWler ve 6LVWHmler 2WREÕV \ROFXODUĊ PDNVLPXP JÕYHQOLN YH NRQIRU EHNOHUOHU =) QLQ ķDQ]ĊPDQODUĊ YH DNVODUĊ EX EHNOHQWLOHULQ NDUķĊODQPDVĊQD\DUGĊPFĊROPDNWDGĊU µUÕQOHULPL] \ROFXODUĊQ DUDFD KĊ]OĊ YH JÕYHQOL ELU ķHNLOGH LQLS ELQPHOHULQL JÕYHQOL YH NH\LƮL ELU \ROFXOXN \DSPDODUĊQĊVDøODU=)ÕUÕQOHULELUELUOHULQHWDPRODUDNX\XPOXGXUYHHQÕVWGÕ]H\WHNQRORML\OHJHOLķWLULOGLNOHUL LÀLQGLQDPLNKĊ]ODQPDYHD\QĊ]DPDQGDVHVVL]ÀDOĊķPDÏ]HOOLNOHULQHVDKLSWLU =)NRPSRQHQWOHULLOHDUDFĊQĊ]ĊQKHPNXOODQĊPÏPUÕPDOL\HWOHULQLKHPGHDUDÀYHÀHYUHÕ]HULQGHNLROXPVX] HWNLOHULQLD]DOWDELOLUVLQL] ]IFRPEXVHs BU GURUR TABLOSUNA BU GURUR BELGESİ YERLİ MALI Yerli üretim Ford Trucks, yerli malı belgesine sahip ilk ağır ticari markası olmanın gururunu yaşıyor. Bugün de yüksek yerlilik oranıyla üretimine devam ediyor, Türkiye kazanıyor. Ford Trucks Her yükte birlikte 444 36 73 / 444 FORD www.fordtrucks.com.tr TRUCKS • ,TRSZQ2&#,3+ #0-$+','120'#1510#"3!#","2&##!-,-+7512)#,-4#0 7-,# &,"5'2&2&#1202-$2&#,#50#1'"#,2'*%-4#0,+#,21712#+',30)#7T,2&'1!-,2#62Q 0#1307","#01#!0#20'2Q,"#','1207-$$',,!#5#0#+#0%#"',2-1',%*#+','1207TTT The Turkish economy was affected by the US- The tension experienced in Turkey-US relations China trade war, Brexit developments, the Fed’s was reflected adversely to the markets due to the case decisions to raise interest rates, geopolitical risks, and of Pastor Andrew Brunson, and the speculative attacks also by some speculative exchange rate attacks.
    [Show full text]
  • CLIMATIC DESIGN INFORMATION Climatic Design Conditions
    CHAPTER 14 CLIMATIC DESIGN INFORMATION Climatic Design Conditions..................................................... 14.1 Generating Design-Day Data ................................................ 14.11 Monthly Design Conditions ..................................................... 14.3 Estimation of Degree-Days .................................................... 14.11 CALCULATING CLEAR-SKY SOLAR RADIATION ............... 14.7 Representativeness of Data and Sources of Uncertainty ....... 14.12 TRANSPOSITION TO RECEIVING SURFACES Other Sources of Climatic Information.................................. 14.15 OF VARIOUS ORIENTATIONS ........................................... 14.9 Appendix: Design Conditions for Selected Locations............ 14.18 HIS chapter and the data on the accompanying CD-ROM pro- chapter. The tables also list heating and cooling degree-days for Tvide the climatic design information for 5564 locations in the bases 65 and 50°F, as well as cooling degree-hours for bases 74 and United States, Canada, and around the world. This is an increase of 80°F. The calculation of daily dry-bulb and wet-bulb temperature 1142 stations from the 2005 ASHRAE Handbook—Fundamentals. profiles, which are useful for generating 24 h weather data sequences The large number of stations, along with the addition of several new suitable as input to many HVAC analysis methods, has been signifi- table elements, made printing the whole tables impractical. Conse- cantly updated, with the inclusion of mean dry-bulb and wet-bulb quently, the complete table of design conditions for only Atlanta, GA, temperature ranges coincident with the 5% monthly dry-bulb and appears in this printed chapter to illustrate the table format. However, wet-bulb design temperatures. a subset of the table elements most often used is presented in the Finally, clear-sky solar radiation calculations have been moved Appendix at the end of this chapter for selected stations representing to this chapter from other chapters.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimations of Undisturbed Ground Temperatures Using Numerical and Analytical Modeling
    ESTIMATIONS OF UNDISTURBED GROUND TEMPERATURES USING NUMERICAL AND ANALYTICAL MODELING By LU XING Bachelor of Arts/Science in Mechanical Engineering Huazhong University of Science & Technology Wuhan, China 2008 Master of Arts/Science in Mechanical Engineering Oklahoma State University Stillwater, OK, US 2010 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December, 2014 ESTIMATIONS OF UNDISTURBED GROUND TEMPERATURES USING NUMERICAL AND ANALYTICAL MODELING Dissertation Approved: Dr. Jeffrey D. Spitler Dissertation Adviser Dr. Daniel E. Fisher Dr. Afshin J. Ghajar Dr. Richard A. Beier ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Jeffrey D. Spitler, who patiently guided me through the hard times and encouraged me to continue in every stage of this study until it was completed. I greatly appreciate all his efforts in making me a more qualified PhD, an independent researcher, a stronger and better person. Also, I would like to devote my sincere thanks to my parents, Hongda Xing and Chune Mei, who have been with me all the time. Their endless support, unconditional love and patience are the biggest reason for all the successes in my life. To all my good friends, colleagues in the US and in China, who talked to me and were with me during the difficult times. I would like to give many thanks to my committee members, Dr. Daniel E. Fisher, Dr. Afshin J. Ghajar and Dr. Richard A. Beier for their suggestions which helped me to improve my research and dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • ANSWERED ON:20.07.2016 Metro Rail Projects Kambhampati Dr
    GOVERNMENT OF INDIA URBAN DEVELOPMENT LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO:672 ANSWERED ON:20.07.2016 Metro Rail Projects Kambhampati Dr. Hari Babu;Mohammed Shri Faizal P.P.;Senguttuvan Shri Balasubramaniam;Somaiya Dr. Kirit;Thomas Prof. Kuruppassery Varkey;Venugopal Dr. Ponnusamy Will the Minister of URBAN DEVELOPMENT be pleased to state: Will the MINISTER OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT be pleased to state: (a) the details of metro rail proposals received by the Government during the last three years and the current year, stretch and State/ UT-wise along with the estimated cost of each stretch; (b) the details of proposals cleared and lying pending stretch and State-wise, the reasons for pendency along with the time by which pending proposals are likely to be cleared; (c) the funds sanctioned, released and utilized during the above period for various projects, stretch and State/UT-wise; (d) the present status of various under construction and sanctioned metro rail stretches, stretch and city-wise and the time by which these are likely to be completed and operationalized; and (e) Whether various metro rail projects are going behind schedule and if so, the details thereof, stretch and city-wise and the details of cost escalated as a result thereof along with the steps taken/being taken to complete these projects within a reasonable period of time? Answer THE MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT (RAO INDERJIT SINGH) (a)& (b) : The details of metro rail proposals received/ cleared/pending during the last three years and the current year along with the names of stretch and the estimated cost stretch wise, State/UT-wise are given in Annexure-I & IA.
    [Show full text]
  • DLA Piper. Details of the Member Entities of DLA Piper Are Available on the Website
    EUROPEAN PPP REPORT 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Report has been published with particular thanks to: The EPEC Executive and in particular, Livia Dumitrescu, Goetz von Thadden, Mathieu Nemoz and Laura Potten. Those EPEC Members and EIB staff who commented on the country reports. Each of the contributors of a ‘View from a Country’. Line Markert and Mikkel Fritsch from Horten for assistance with the report on Denmark. Andrei Aganimov from Borenius & Kemppinen for assistance with the report on Finland. Maura Capoulas Santos and Alberto Galhardo Simões from Miranda Correia Amendoeira & Associados for assistance with the report on Portugal. Gustaf Reuterskiöld and Malin Cope from DLA Nordic for assistance with the report on Sweden. Infra-News for assistance generally and in particular with the project lists. All those members of DLA Piper who assisted with the preparation of the country reports and finally, Rosemary Bointon, Editor of the Report. Production of Report and Copyright This European PPP Report 2009 ( “Report”) has been produced and edited by DLA Piper*. DLA Piper acknowledges the contribution of the European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC)** in the preparation of the Report. DLA Piper retains editorial responsibility for the Report. In contributing to the Report neither the European Investment Bank, EPEC, EPEC’s Members, nor any Contributor*** indicates or implies agreement with, or endorsement of, any part of the Report. This document is the copyright of DLA Piper and the Contributors. This document is confidential and personal to you. It is provided to you on the understanding that it is not to be re-used in any way, duplicated or distributed without the written consent of DLA Piper or the relevant Contributor.
    [Show full text]
  • Hizli Rayli Sistemlerin Yolcu Taşima Kapasite Hesaplamalari Ve Türkiyedeki Benzer Sistemlerin Birbirleriyle Karşilaştirilmasi
    HIZLI RAYLI SİSTEMLERİN YOLCU TAŞIMA KAPASİTE HESAPLAMALARI VE TÜRKİYEDEKİ BENZER SİSTEMLERİN BİRBİRLERİYLE KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI Ilgaz CANDEMİR_ , Serhan TANYEL_ SUMMARY Rail transit systems are found to be the most trusted transit systems all over the world. They have become one of the main parts of daily urban life as they provide, fast, safe and comfortable journey for passengers. If they are planned precisely, capacities up to10000-40000 passengers/hour can be achieved. They are also used as an important tool for to maintain well developed cities and provide dynamic city centers. In this study, some of the most important rail transit systems in Turkey are introduced. Their capacities tried to be determined by using different capacity calculation methods and the results are tired to be compared. ÖZET Dünyada halen en güvenilir ulaşõm modu, raylõ sistemlerdir. Gelişen teknolojinin yansõmasõ ile birlikte hõz, sinyalizasyon ve konfor problemlerini çözen kentsel raylõ sistemler büyük şehirler için vazgeçilmez olmuşlardõr. Planlama ,dizayn,araç ve ekipman seçimi, inşaat ve sonrasõnda çok titiz bir işletim isteyen metro hatlarõ ortalama 10000-40000 yolcu/saat kapasiteleri olan güçlü toplu taşõmacõlõk sistemlerdir. Raylõ sistemler ayrõca kentin homojen olarak gelişmesinin sağlanmasõnda önemli bir araç olarak görülmekte ve dinamik kent merkezlerinin oluşturulmasõnda etken olmaktadõrlar. Bu bildiride Türkiye’deki raylõ sistemleri hakkõnda kõsaca bilgi verildikten sonra, Türkiye’deki bazõ önemli raylõ ulaşõm sistemlerinin kapasiteleri farklõ yöntemlerle hesaplanarak, birbirleriyle karşõlaştõrõlmaya çalõşõlmõştõr. 1.GİRİŞ Dünyada 179 farklõ şehrin benimsendiği Metro ,hafif raylõ ve tramvay gibi kentiçi raylõ ulaşõm sistemleri, son yõllarda geç kalõnmasõna rağmen belediyelerimizin de rağbet ettiği ve ulaşõm politikalarõnõn baş hedefi haline gelen pahalõ inşaat yatõrõmlarõdõr.
    [Show full text]
  • GMT Report2012.Qxp
    GLOBAL METRO PROJECTS REPORT 2012 Metropolitan railways (metros) are high capacity electric transport systems that operate on dedicated routes, and can thereby achieve high service speed and frequency. Over the last few years, metros (also known as subway, underground or tube) have evolved as an efficient and effective urban mobility solution in addressing the growing concerns of urbanisation and climate change. This is supported by the fact that despite high capital requirements the sector witnessed a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.7 per cent between 2005 and 2010. In high density urban areas, metros form the backbone of integrated public transport systems and offer proven economic, social and environmental benefits. Given the huge investment requirement and long life span, metro systems have always been a driving force for technological and financial innovations. Government and metro operators are constantly seeking solutions to improve reliability and customer service, lower fuel and maintenance costs, as well as increase efficiency and safety levels in operations. The Global Metro Projects Report provides updated information on the world's top 101 metro projects that present significant capital investment opportunities. These projects have a total existing network length of about 8,900 km and a proposed length of over 8,000 km. The report covers 51 countries representing about 80 per cent of the world’s gross domestic product. It presents the key information required to assess investment opportunities in the development of new lines, extension and upgrade of existing lines, rolling stock procurement and refurbishment, power and communication systems upgrades, fare collection, as well as station construction and refurbishment.
    [Show full text]
  • Powerpoint Sunusu
    TURKISH STATE RAILWAYS (TCDD) Infrastructure Development & Regulations in Railway Sector NAZIM BÜKÜLMEZ Deputy Head of RP&C Department1 CONTENTS Vision and Mission Historical Development The State of the Art Key Projects Vision 2023 Rail systems in Urban Transportation The Law on Liberalization of Turkish Rail Transportation CONTENTS Vision and Mission Historical Development Current Situation Key Projects Vision 2023 Rail systems in Urban Transportation The Law on Liberalization of Turkish Rail Transportation VISION and MISSION of TCDD Vision: Mission: To make railways the preferred To have the existing network mode of transport and to be and vehicles ready for service, the locomotive power for to construct new lines and development of the country links if necessary, to keep connections with other transport systems, and to provide economical, safe, comfortable and environmentally friendly transport services CONTENTS Vision and Mission Historical Development Current Situation Key Projects Vision 2023 Rail systems in Urban Transportation The Law on Liberalization of Turkish Rail Transportation HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF RAILWAYS EDİRNE ZONGULDAK SAMSUN İSTANBUL KARS ERZURUM BANDIRMA ANKARA BURSA ESKİŞEHİR SİVAS ERZİNCAN POLATLI AFYON ELAZIĞ TATVAN VAN İZMİR KAYSERİ MALATYA KONYA DİYARBAKIR ADANA GAZİANTEP MERSİN 2012 : 12,008 km ( Conventional+ High Speed) Rail Network before the REPUBLIC 4,136 km Mainline The First Years of the REPUBLIC (1923-1950) 3,764 km Mainline (avg. 134 km per annum) From 1951 to 2002 945 km Mainline (avg. 18 km per annum) From 2005 to end of 2012 1,094 km Mainline (avg. 137km per annum) Lines under construction 3,400 km Mainline TCDD is a 157-year old enterprise 10 million passengers were transported.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Exploitation Plan
    D9.10 – Final Exploitation Plan Jorge Lpez (Atos), Alessandra Tedeschi (DBL), Julian Williams (UDUR), abio Massacci (UNITN), Raminder Ruprai (NGRID), Andreas Schmitz ( raunhofer), Emilio Lpez (URJC), Michael Pellot (TMB), Zden,a Mansfeldov. (ISASCR), Jan J/r0ens ( raunhofer) Pending of approval from the Research Executive Agency - EC Document Number D1.10 Document Title inal e5ploitation plan Version 1.0 Status inal Work Packa e WP 1 Deliverable Type Report Contractual Date of Delivery 31 .01 .20 18 Actual Date of Delivery 31.01.2018 Responsible Unit ATOS Contributors ISASCR, UNIDUR, UNITN, NGRID, DBL, URJC, raunhofer, TMB (eyword List E5ploitation, ramewor,, Preliminary, Requirements, Policy papers, Models, Methodologies, Templates, Tools, Individual plans, IPR Dissemination level PU SECONO.ICS Consortium SECONOMICS ?Socio-Economics meets SecurityA (Contract No. 28C223) is a Collaborative pro0ect) within the 7th ramewor, Programme, theme SEC-2011.E.8-1 SEC-2011.7.C-2 ICT. The consortium members are: UniversitG Degli Studi di Trento (UNITN) Pro0ect Manager: prof. abio Massacci 1 38100 Trento, Italy abio.MassacciHunitn.it www.unitn.it DEEP BLUE Srl (DBL) Contact: Alessandra Tedeschi 2 00113 Roma, Italy Alessandra.tedeschiHdblue.it www.dblue.it raunhofer -Gesellschaft zur Irderung der angewandten Contact: Prof. Jan J/r0ens 3 orschung e.V., Hansastr. 27c, 0an.0uer0ensHisst.fraunhofer.de 80E8E Munich, Germany http://www.fraunhofer.de/ UNIVERSIDAD REL JUAN CARLOS, Contact: Prof. David Rios Insua 8 Calle TulipanS/N, 28133, Mostoles david.riosHur0c.es
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning Volume 1, Issue 2, pp:132-151. ISSN: 2147-9380 available online at: www.iconarp.com ICONARP Successes and Failures in Urban Development of Ankara Özge YALÇINER ERCOŞKUN Abstract Ankara, the capital of Turkey, represents a modern model city built in Keywords: the Republican period after 1923. The majority of the countries’ Ankara, Urban Planning, Car- Oriented policies, Transformation, population resides in this city after İstanbul and political, social and economic functions are mostly clustered in the urban zone. After 1940s, Urban Sustainability the city changed dramatically. Its population grew enormously and the city expanded through conversion of agricultural lands in the west. In addition, political and educational developments produced a significant Özge YALÇINER ERCOŞKUN, Doç.Dr. population of officials and students within the city. This paper focuses Gazi Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi, Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Bölümü, on patterns of settlement in Ankara from ancient times to today and Ankara. explains these from developments in the urban planning perspective. It [email protected] concludes that the global shopping malls and local transport- landuse policies together with the structure of housing market have directed the city to car-oriented sprawled development without an identity, encouraged the development of gated communities in the city. It InternationalJournal Architectureof and Planning Özge YALÇINER ERCOŞKUN concludes by posing the question whether this may change in the future and more mixed use can be expected. Özet Türkiye’nin başkenti Ankara, 1923’te Cumhuriyetin kurulmasıyla modern kentin simgesi olmuştur. İstanbul’dan sonra ülke nüfusunun çoğunluğunun yaşadığı kentte politik, sosyal ve ekonomik işlevler kentsel bölgede kümelenmiştir.
    [Show full text]
  • LUCKNOW METRO RAIL CORPORATION LIMITED Administrative Building, Vipin Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow-226010
    CIN : U60300UP2013SGC060836 LUCKNOW METRO RAIL CORPORATION LIMITED Administrative Building, Vipin Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow-226010 Phone: 0522- 2304014-15 NOTICE No. LMRC/HR/Recruitment/O&M/3/2018/NE01 dated 17/7/2018. Ref: - LMRC Advertisement No. LMRC/HR/Rectt./O&M/3/2018 dated 21/2/2018 ---------------------- 10 numbers of Candidates bearing following Roll Numbers (arranged in merit order with application of vertical and horizontal reservation) have been short listed provisionally for Biometric Verification, Document Verification & Medical Examination for the post of Station Controller cum Train Operator (SC/TO)(NE-01), the online written test of which was held by LMRC on 16/4/2018 and Psycho Aptitude Test held from 09-5-2018 to 12-5-2018 Venue : HR Branch, LMRC Depot, Transport Nagar, near 32 PAC Batalion, Lucknow. (Location- Within 8 Km. from Charbagh Rly. Station) Post Name & Code : Station Controller CumTrain Operator (SC/TO)(NE-01) Date & Reporting Time : 23-July-2018 at 09-30 AM Number of candidate called : 10 (including reserved community candidates). Candidate should bring 10 passport size recent colour photographs with all original documents/certificates. The standard of Medical Examination for Station Controller/Train Operator (SC/TO)(NE-01) is A-1(Aye-One). The process of medical examination may take up to 3 working days. The candidate must come prepared to join training immediately, as the requirement is very urgent. Candidates may note that the call for Document Verification & Medical Examination of shortlisted candidates for the post of Station Controller/Train Operator (SC/TO)(NE-01) is purely provisional subject to their fulfillment of the eligibility criteria as mentioned in advertisement notice No.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Turkish Rail Transit Investments
    AN ANALYSIS OF RAIL TRANSIT INVESTMENTS IN TURKEY: ARE THE EXPECTATIONS MET? A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY ÖZGE ÖZGÜR IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN URBAN DESIGN IN CITY AND REGIONAL PLANNING NOVEMBER 2009 Approval of the thesis: AN ANALYSIS OF RAIL TRANSIT INVESTMENTS IN TURKEY: ARE THE EXPECTATIONS MET? submitted by ÖZGE ÖZGÜR in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in City and Regional Planning Department, Urban Design, Middle East Technical University by, Prof. Dr. Canan Özgen _____________________ Dean, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Prof. Dr. Melih Ersoy _____________________ Head of Department, City and Regional Planning Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ela Babalık Sutcliffe _____________________ Supervisor, City and Regional Planning Dept., METU Examining Committee Members: Prof. Dr. Ali Türel _____________________ City and Regional Planning Dept., METU Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ela Babalık Sutcliffe _____________________ City and Regional Planning Dept., METU Assoc. Prof. Dr. Baykan Günay _____________________ City and Regional Planning Dept., METU Assist. Prof. Dr. Ebru Vesile Öcalır _____________________ Traffic Planning and Implementation Dept., Gazi University Turgay Günal, M.Sc. _____________________ Date: 18.11.2009 ________________ iii I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Özge ÖZGÜR iii ABSTRACT AN ANALYSIS OF RAIL TRANSIT INVESTMENTS IN TURKEY: ARE THE EXPECTATIONS MET?* Özgür, Özge M.S., Department of City and Regional Planning, Urban Design Supervisor: Assoc.
    [Show full text]