DOCSLIB.ORG

Deception in Seneca, the Stoic a Thesis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Deception in Seneca, the Stoic a Thesis SELF-LOVE AND SELF- DECEPTION IN SENECA, THE STOIC A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF THE MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY AYTEN SURURI IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY MARCH 2005 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences _______________________ Prof. Dr. Sencer Ayata Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________________________ Prof. Dr. Ahmet İnam Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _________________________ _________________ Assist. Prof. Dr. Ş. Halil Turan Prof. Dr. Ahmet İnam Co-Supervisor Supervisor Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. Ahmet İnam (METU, PHIL) _________________ Prof. Dr. Yasin Ceylan (METU, PHIL) _________________ Prof. Dr. Sabri Büyükdüvenci (AÜDTCF, FELS.) _________________ Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ş. Halil Turan (METU, PHIL) _________________ Assist. Prof. Dr. Ertu ğrul Turan (AÜDTCF, FELS.) _________________ I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Surname: Ayten Sururi Signature: iii ABSTRACT SELF-LOVE AND SELF-DECEPTION IN SENECA, THE STOIC Sururi, Ayten Ph. D., Department of Philosophy Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Ahmet Inam Co-Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ş. Halil Turan March 2005, 168 pages In this thesis, Seneca’s notion of self as self-love and the problem of self- deception are analyzed. In examining three types of self-love, –ignorant, progressing selves,–three models of self-deception are discussed. Self-deception is related to the problem of self-knowledge. I discuss the nature of self-love as self-esteem and self-preservation and self-shaping all of which are innate qualities and develop into more complex forms of knowing. Passions are concrete examples of the representations of deceived self; central to the overestimation of indifferents, the deceived self displays a pattern of reasoning that creates a paradox between what the self intends to do and what it actually appears or what the self wants to see himself as and what it actually is. In discussing various types of self-deception, it is argued that problem of deception can hardly be overcome practically even by education, although it is naturally possible. While the ignorant deceive themselves beyond their recognition, in the case of the educated selves, the tension between the knowledge of ignorance and the desire to be the person play an important role in self-deception. No one except the sage is free from self- deception. The thesis deals with the issue of self-knowing as a scarce possibility. Keywords: Seneca, self-deception, self-knowledge, Stoics, passions. iv ŐZ STOACI SENECA’ DA KEND İNİ SEVME VE KEND İNİ KANDIRMA Sururi, Ayten Ph. D., Felsefe B őlűmű Tez Y őneticisi: Prof. Dr. Ahmet Inam Ortak Tez Yőneticisi : Doc. Dr. Ş. Halil Turan Mart 2005, 168 sayfa Bu tez çalışmasında Seneca’daki kendini seven benlik kavramı ve kendini kandırma problemi analiz edilmi ştir. Durumunun farkında olmayan ve de iki tip eğitimli, toplam üç benlik tartı şmasında, üç tip kendini kandırma modeli tartı şılmı ştır. Benli ğin do ğasında kendine de ğer verme, kendini koruma ve kendini olmak istedi ği gibi şekillendirme őzellikleri oldu ğu iddia edilmi ştir. Duygular, kendini kand ιran benli ğin kendini gősterdi ği durumlar olarak ele alınmı ştır. Kendini bilme problemi, nesnelere yükledi ği de ğerleri bilmemesinden yola çıkarak, daha sonra usa vurma modelinde tartı şılmı ştır. Usa vurma modeli yapmak veya olmak istedi ği ile gerçekte ne oldu ğu arasindaki zıtlık űzerinde kurulmu ştur. Kendini kandiran benlik tiplemeleri tartı şmasında kendini kandırmanın a şılması do ğal olarak mümkün ama pratikte e ğitime ra ğmen bunun zor oldu ğu iddia idilir. Durumunun farkında olmayan benliklerin yanı sıra, eğitimlilerin kendini kandırmasının temelinde, durumunun farkındalı ğı ve a şmak isteme arzusu arasındakı gerilimden kaynaklanır. Bu tez çalı şması kendini bilmenin a şılması zor bir durum oldu ğunu savunur. Anahtar Sözcükler: Seneca, kendini kandırma, kendini bilme, Stoalar, duygular. v To all Lovers vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I owe special thanks to Prof. Dr Ahmet İnam for years of vigorous and insightful discussion about the issues in this thesis. I owe a special debt of gratitude to Assoc. Prof. Dr. Halil Turan for his valuable comments on the earlier drafts of this thesis. Also, I am much indebted to Prof. Dr. Sabri Büyükdüvenci, Prof. Dr. Yasin Ceylan and Asst. Prof. Dr. Ertu ğrul Turan for their contribution to the final draft of this work. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS PLAGIARISM…………………………………………………………………..iii ABSTRACT………………………………………………………………………v ŐZ…………………………………………………………………………………v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………………………… vi TABLE OF CONTENTS ……………………………………………………...vii CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………….1 2. AMOR SUI: SELF IN EMBRYONIC FORM. 2.1 Amor sui; self-perception and self preservation ……………………......14 2.2 Amor sui and the state of conciliari..……………………………………. 21 2.3 Towards the foundation of self as self-love ……………………………...24 3. NATURE OF SELF LOVE 3.1 Self-esteem and Self-Preservation...………………………………………31 3.2 Self-Knowing and Self –Love……………………………………………...39 3.3 Problem of Self-Deception ………………………………………………...42 4. SELF IN CONFLICT 4.1 Origin of Self-Deception………………………………………………...... 52 4.2 Reasoning in Passions: the craft of the deceived ………………………..60 4.3 The Pleasure and Pain of the Deceived …………………………………73 4.4 Passions: perverted form of self-preservation …………………………..80 4.5 Self-Love and Self-identification of the Deceived………………………...83 5. SELF-LOVE IN PROGRESSING SELVES 5.1 Norms of self-Knowing ……………………………………………………89 5.2 Self-love in progressing selves type II & III……………………………...94 5. 3 Nature of Reasoning and Irrationality…………………………………..100 5.4 Pleasure and Pain ………………………………………………………...106 5.5 Craft of the Progressing Selves…………………………………………. 107 6. PHILOSOPHICAL EDUCATION 6.1 A preliminary Word on Education ……………………………………...110 6.2 Education of the Child …………………………………………………...116 6.3 A view of the Knowledge of Self ………………………………………...117 6.4 Practical Education……………………………………………………….123 6.5 How the Sage Loves……………………………………………………....128 7. CONCLUSIONS 7.1 Human Nature: Reason and Self-Love …………………………………136 7.2 Seneca’s Stoicism …………………………………………………………139 7.3 A Word on the Structural Nature of self ……………………………….142 BIBLIOGRAPHY..............................................................................................143 APPENDICES…………………………………………………………………149 A. Original Texts……………………………………………………………...149 B. T űrkçe Őzet………………………………………………………………...160 CURRICULUM VITAE……………………………………………………...168 CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION This thesis aims at a critical study of Seneca’s notion of self as self-love and the problem of self-deception. The issue of self-deception is discussed within a broader problem of self-knowledge, which is dealt with in the context of passion-reason dichotomy in writings of Seneca. As a preliminary to the presentation of the problem of self-deception and self-knowing I shall discuss what Seneca precisely means by self-love. The term self-love is not a novelty in the Ancient philosophical tradition. Plato 1 mentions self-love as a vicious state of soul. Later, it recurs in the context of friendship in Aristotle. 2 In the writings of Stoics of the Roman tradition, self-love is introduced as the Latin translation of the Greek ‘oikeionon’ by Cicero, 3 with its moral associations. ‘Oikeionon’ is an important concept in Stoic moral psychology; it is proposed both as a psychological faculty and an ethical norm by Chrysippus (280- 207 BC), head of the Old Stoa after Cleanthes (331-232 BC). The term won popularity among the forthcoming thinkers of the Stoic school of both early and late tradition. ‘Oikeionon’ is an innate propensity of self-interest, concerning the maintenance of the body and the bodily constitution which is commonly shared by all living beings in Nature. As a psychic faculty, it is structured on the instinctive inclination towards the useful and avoiding the opposite. As human beings by nature are social and rational beings, ‘oikeionon’ develops from the instinctive behaviors of the maintenance of existence to the total grasp of human telos which the Stoics claim as the chief Good, happiness and also the state of virtue. The famous motto, living in accordance with nature, becomes living a life in accordance with rational principles and also virtue. This is the point where oikeionon becomes also an ethical norm. The total grasp of human telos, is based on the understanding of rational principles, or to be more exact gaining access to 1 Plato, Laws , (731) 2 Nicomachean Ethics (1166.4 ) 3 Cicero De Finibus, (3.16.5) 1 their rational selves and live in accordance with these principles. This is, however, a rare case, reserved to the sage only. For the rest of humankind, ‘oikeinon’ is an excessive self-interest, which the Stoics discuss in the context of passions, ranging from greed, ambition, jealousy, lust, to anger and glory. For the Stoics in general passions are irrational disposition of the soul; their irrationality is primarily
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Stoics and the Practical: a Roman Reply to Aristotle
    DePaul University Via Sapientiae College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences 8-2013 The Stoics and the practical: a Roman reply to Aristotle Robin Weiss DePaul University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd Recommended Citation Weiss, Robin, "The Stoics and the practical: a Roman reply to Aristotle" (2013). College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations. 143. https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd/143 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE STOICS AND THE PRACTICAL: A ROMAN REPLY TO ARISTOTLE A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August, 2013 BY Robin Weiss Department of Philosophy College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences DePaul University Chicago, IL - TABLE OF CONTENTS - Introduction……………………..............................................................................................................p.i Chapter One: Practical Knowledge and its Others Technê and Natural Philosophy…………………………….....……..……………………………….....p. 1 Virtue and technical expertise conflated – subsequently distinguished in Plato – ethical knowledge contrasted with that of nature in
    [Show full text]
  • Augustine's Criticisms of the Stoic Theory of Passions
    Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers Volume 20 Issue 4 Article 3 10-1-2003 Augustine's Criticisms of the Stoic Theory of Passions T.H. Irwin Follow this and additional works at: https://place.asburyseminary.edu/faithandphilosophy Recommended Citation Irwin, T.H. (2003) "Augustine's Criticisms of the Stoic Theory of Passions," Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers: Vol. 20 : Iss. 4 , Article 3. DOI: 10.5840/faithphil20032043 Available at: https://place.asburyseminary.edu/faithandphilosophy/vol20/iss4/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers by an authorized editor of ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange. AUGUSTINE'S CRITICISMS OF THE STOIC THEORY OF PASSIONS T.H.Irwin Augustine defends three claims about the passions: (1) The Stoic position dif­ fers only verbally from the Platonic-Aristotelian position. (2) The Stoic position is wrong and the Platonic-Aristotelian position is right. (3) The will is engaged in the different passions; indeed the different passions are different expressions of the will. The first two claims, properly understood, are defensible. But the most plausible versions of them give us good reason to doubt the third claim. 1. A full exploration of Augustine's reflexions on the nature of the passions would introduce us to some of his central moral and theological concems. I do not intend to undertake this full exploration. I want to discuss his claim about the proper interpretation of the Stoic conception of the passions in relation to the Platonic and Aristotelian view.
    [Show full text]
  • Aeschynē in Aristotle's Conception of Human Nature Melissa Marie Coakley University of South Florida, [email protected]
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 3-20-2014 Aeschynē in Aristotle's Conception of Human Nature Melissa Marie Coakley University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Philosophy Commons Scholar Commons Citation Coakley, Melissa Marie, "Aeschynē in Aristotle's Conception of Human Nature" (2014). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/4999 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Aeschynē in Aristotle’s Conception of Human Nature by Melissa M. Coakley A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy College of Arts and Science University of South Florida Major Professor: Joanne Waugh, Ph.D. Bruce Silver, Ph.D. Roger Ariew, Ph.D. Thomas Williams, Ph.D. Date of Approval: March 20, 2014 Keywords: Shame, Anaeschyntia, Aidōs, Aischynē, Ancient Greek Passions Copyright © 2014, Melissa M. Coakley DEDICATION This manuscript is dedicated to my husband Bill Murray and to my parents: Joan and Richard Coakley. Thank you for your endless support, encouragement, and friendship. To Dr. John P. Anton, I have learned from you the importance of having a “ton of virtue and a shield of nine layers for protection from the abysmal depths of vice.” Thank you for believing in me, my dear friend.
    [Show full text]
  • Passionate Platonism: Plutarch on the Positive Role of Non-Rational Affects in the Good Life
    Passionate Platonism: Plutarch on the Positive Role of Non-Rational Affects in the Good Life by David Ryan Morphew A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Classical Studies) in The University of Michigan 2018 Doctoral Committee: Professor Victor Caston, Chair Professor Sara Ahbel-Rappe Professor Richard Janko Professor Arlene Saxonhouse David Ryan Morphew [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4773-4952 ©David Ryan Morphew 2018 DEDICATION To my wife, Renae, whom I met as I began this project, and who has supported me throughout its development. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I am grateful to my advisors and dissertation committee for their encouragement, support, challenges, and constructive feedback. I am chiefly indebted to Victor Caston for his comments on successive versions of chapters, for his great insight and foresight in guiding me in the following project, and for steering me to work on Plutarch’s Moralia in the first place. No less am I thankful for what he has taught me about being a scholar, mentor, and teacher, by his advice and especially by his example. There is not space here to express in any adequate way my gratitude also to Sara Ahbel-Rappe and Richard Janko. They have been constant sources of inspiration. I continue to be in awe of their ability to provide constructive criticism and to give incisive critiques coupled with encouragement and suggestions. I am also indebted to Arlene Saxonhouse for helping me to see the scope and import of the following thesis not only as of interest to the history of philosophy but also in teaching our students to reflect on the kind of life that we want to live.
    [Show full text]
  • Emotions.Pdf
    April 2011 Forthcoming in R. Crisp ed, The Oxford Handbook to the History of Ethics Emotion and the Emotions Susan Sauvé Meyer Adrienne M. Martin A prominent theme in twentieth and early twenty-first century moral philosophy is that a full and accurate picture of the ethical life must include an important role for the emotions. The neglect of the emotions has been a major point of criticism raised against the dominant consequentialist, Kantian, and contractualist theories by virtue ethicists such as G.E.M. Anscombe, Alisdair MacIntyre, Martha Nussbaum, and Michael Stocker. Bernard Williams and Susan Wolf also develop a similar line of criticism as part of their arguments against the supremacy or priority of moral values as conceived by utilitarianism and other “impartialist” theories. There are a number of reasons why it might be a mistake for moral philosophy to neglect the emotions. To name just three: 1. It seems obvious that emotions have an important influence on motivation, and that proper cultivation of the emotions is helpful, perhaps essential, to our ability to lead ethical lives. 2. It is also arguable that emotions are objects of moral evaluation, not only because of their influence on action, but in themselves. In other words, it is a plausible thesis that an ethical life involves feeling certain ways in certain circumstances and acting from certain feelings in certain circumstances. 3. Finally, a more contentious thesis, but certainly worth considering, is that some emotions are forms of ethical perception, judgment, or even knowledge. The bulk of this chapter surveys the Ancient ethical tradition that inspires the virtue ethicist’s critique, revealing versions of each of these three theses in one guise or another.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom from Passions in Augustine
    UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI FACULTY OF THEOLOGY FINLAND FREEDOM FROM PASSIONS IN AUGUSTINE Gao Yuan 高 源 ACADEMIC DISSERTATION To be publicly discussed, by due permission of the Faculty of Theology at the University of Helsinki in Lecture Hall 13, University Main Building, on 4 November 2015, at 12 noon Helsinki 2015 ISBN 978-951-51-1625-3 (paperback) ISBN 978-951-51-1626-0 (PDF) Copyright © Gao Yuan (高源) https://ethesis.helsinki.fi/en Cover: Wang Rui and Gao Yuan Juvenes Print Oy Helsinki 2015 ABSTRACT This study presents a general overview of Augustine’s insights into passions as well as his approach to the therapy of emotions and their sanctification. Attending to various phases of his writings, this work explores the systematic structure of Augustine’s tenets on passions and on the freedom from passions in the context of his philosophical and theological convictions on the issue of amor sui and amor Dei. The analysis begins by examining Augustine’s language of passions and the doctrinal connections between Augustine and his predecessors. I provide a survey of Augustine’s usage of emotional terms and criticise the position that Augustine suggested a dichotomy between passio and affectus as well as the claim that none of Augustine’s Latin terms can be justifiably translated by the modern term “emotion”. On the basis of terminological and doctrinal observations, I clarify the general features of Augustine’s psychology of passions in Chapter 2. In addressing the issue of how Augustine transformed his predecessors’ therapy of passions and their ideal of freedom from emotion into his theological framework in Chapter 3, I examine a series of related concepts, such as propatheia, metriopatheia, apatheia and eupatheia, to determine how he understood them in various stages of his philosophical and theological thinking.
    [Show full text]
  • Between Medicine and Rhetoric: Therapeutic Arguments in Roman Stoicism
    e­­‑ISSN 2084–1043 p-ISSN 2083–6635 Vol. 9 (1/2019) pp. 11–24 Published online: 30.11.2019 www.argument-journal.eu Between medicine and rhetoric: therapeutic arguments in Roman Stoicism Krzysztof ŁAPIŃSKI* ABSTRACT In this paper, I intend to focus on some rhetorical strategies of argumentation which play crucial role in the therapeutic discourse of Roman Stoicism, namely in Musonius Rufus, Ep- ictetus, Seneca, and Marcus Aurelius. Reference is made to Chaim Perelman’s view of ancient rhetoric as an art of inventing arguments. Moreover, it is pointed out that in rhetorical educa- tion (cf. Cicero, Ad Herennium, Quintilian, etc.) as well as in therapeutic discourse the concept of “exercise” and constant practice play a crucial role. KEYWORDS Stoicism; Musonius Rufus; Epictetus; Seneca; Marcus Aurelius; Chaim Perelman; consola- tion; spiritual exercise * PhD, assistant professor, Institute of Philosophy, University of Warsaw. E-mail: [email protected]. This research paper was supported by an NCN Miniatura 2 grant to carry out research at the University of Cambridge, UK (reg. no. 2018/02/X/HS1/01200). DOI: 10.24917/20841043.01 12 Krzysztof ŁAPIŃSKI Ancient Greek and Roman philosophy was focused not only on inquiring into the nature of the world, but also on transforming human minds. In order to describe that tendency more adequately, various scholars have labelled it as, for example, spiritual exercises (Pierre Hadot), the art of living (Michel Foucault), the therapy of desire (Martha Nussbaum), or spiritual guidance (Paul Rab- bow and Ilsetraut Hadot). The therapeutic paradigm becomes predominant in Hellenistic and Roman times.
    [Show full text]
  • Akrasia and Enkrateia in Ancient Stoicism: Minor Vice and Minor Virtue?*
    AKRASIA AND ENKRATEIA IN ANCIENT STOICISM: MINOR VICE AND MINOR VIRTUE?* Jean-Baptiste Gourinat At fi rst glance, the case of akrasia in Ancient Stoicism is quickly closed: the word is found twice in the Stoicorum veterum fragmenta, while the word akratês may be found once, and akrasia again may be found twice in Epictetus1 and nowhere in Marcus Aurelius.2 One may try to persuade oneself that the ten or so occurrences of impotens and impotentia in Seneca refer to akrasia, but, in fact, this is rather unlikely. This situation is echoed by the quasi-absence of the word in classical or recent accounts of Stoic ethics: the word occurs once in Dyroff ’s classic study,3 never appears in Max Forschner’s Die stoische Ethik,4 and Brad Inwood, in Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism, shows excellently that the phenomenon of weak will was rejected by the Stoics.5 Akrasia evidently does not play in Stoic ethics the central role it plays in Aristotelian ethics, for instance. The reason for this is clear: akrasia implies a confl ict between two parts of the soul, a rational part and an irrational one, the weakness of the rational part being unable to dominate the irrational one. But the Stoics * I am very grateful to Pierre Destrée for convincing me to work on this topic, which, at fi rst, seemed to me of no great pertinence for Stoic thought. This paper will show, I hope, that the matter is more important than it may seem to be, and that Pierre Destrée was well inspired.
    [Show full text]
  • A STUDY of SENECA‟S MORAL PHILOSOPHY by Robert
    Curing Human Misery: A Study of Seneca's Moral Philosophy Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Wagoner, Robert Stephen Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 01/10/2021 21:28:23 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/202933 1 CURING HUMAN MISERY: A STUDY OF SENECA‟S MORAL PHILOSOPHY by Robert Stephen Wagoner _____________________ Copyright © Robert Stephen Wagoner 2011 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2011 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Robert Wagoner entitled Curing Human Misery: A Study of Seneca’s Moral Philosophy and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy _______________________________________________________________________ Date: 8/10/11 Julia Annas _______________________________________________________________________ Date: 8/10/11 Rachana Kamtekar _______________________________________________________________________ Date: 8/10/11 Mark Timmons Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate‟s submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College. I hereby certify that I have read this dissertation prepared under my direction and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY of AMERICA Passions, Virtue, And
    THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA Passions, Virtue, and Moral Growth in John of Apamea’s Dialogues on the Soul A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty of the School of Theology and Religious Studies Of The Catholic University of America In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree Doctor of Philosophy By Rodrigue J. Constantin Washington, D.C. 2020 Abstract Passions, Virtue, and Moral Growth in John of Apamea’s Dialogues on the Soul Rodrigue J. Constantin, Ph.D. Director: Paul J. Scherz, Ph.D. Virtue cultivation is an under-researched topic in theological virtue ethics. Moreover, little attention is given in virtue ethics to vice and its impact on virtue cultivation. In this dissertation, I respond to this lacuna by examining the role of the removal of evil passions in moral growth in the Dialogues on the Soul, whose author, John of Apamea, is a fifth-century ascetic who has introduced the discussion of passions in Syriac Christianity. For John, moral growth occurs in three stages: somaticity, psychicality, and pneumaticity. I argue that, for John, the gradual healing from evil passions facilitates one’s moral progress from one stage to another. After examining John’s theological anthropology, in the first chapter, I explore his views on the relationship of the body and the soul with the passions in chapters two and three. In chapter four, I focus on the morality of the passions, that is, whether the passions in themselves are good or evil, and to what degree one is morally responsible for them. I, then, reconstruct, in chapter five, a list of the passions and their variations in the Dialogues on the Soul, as well as the structure of the passions as stirrings that are intimately connected to thoughts.
    [Show full text]
  • Anger, Present Injustice and Future Revenge in Seneca's
    2006020. Volk Williams. 05_Vogt. Proef 1. 10-4-2006:14.48, page 57. ANGER, PRESENT INJUSTICE AND FUTURE REVENGE IN SENECA’S DE IRA Katja Maria Vogt De ira is, as Seneca states in the beginning, a treatise on how to alleviate anger.* While other emotions may still have something calm about them, anger, according to Seneca, is all excitement, raging towards vengeance (1.1.1). The idea that we should aim at getting rid of anger is tied to the theoretical discussion of anger: once we understand what we actively do when we experience anger, we can stop short of getting angry. De ira stands within a Stoic tradition of discussing the therapy of the emotions.1 Seneca’s concern with anger is not only in line with the general Stoic conviction that emotions are irrational, but also with a more widespread ancient interest in anger as a particularly violent emotion. However, in spite of the particular attention that is devoted to anger, it seems that, of all emotions, anger is surprisingly difficult to understand within the Stoic framework. The violent anger which is at stake in ancient discussions has an element of pain and an element of desire; the agent feels unjustly harmed and desires revenge. But according to the Stoic framework, an emotion can either be a kind of pain (lupê)2 or a kind of desire * I am grateful to William Harris for inviting me to present an earlier version of this paper at the Conference “New Directions in Seneca Studies” (Columbia Univeristy, February 2004), and for the helpful comments and questions from the participants at the conference.
    [Show full text]
  • Paulo Fernando Tadeu Ferreira Destino, Exortações Eficazes E Punições Justas Em Crisipo
    UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO FACULTY OF PHILOSOPHY, LANGUAGES, AND HUMAN SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE SCHOOL IN PHILOSOPHY PAULO FERNANDO TADEU FERREIRA DESTINO, EXORTAÇÕES EFICAZES E PUNIÇÕES JUSTAS EM CRISIPO VERSÃO CORRIGIDA/REVISED VERSION SÃO PAULO 2017 PAULO FERNANDO TADEU FERREIRA CHRYSIPPUS ON FATE, EFFECTIVE EXHORTATION, AND DESERT VERSÃO CORRIGIDA/REVISED VERSION A Thesis submitted to the Graduate School in Philosophy of the Department of Philosophy of the Faculty of Philosophy, Languages, and Human Sciences of the University of São Paulo, in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, under the supervision of Prof. Dr. Marco Antonio de Avila Zingano. In agreement: ____________________ Prof. Dr. Marco Zingano SÃO PAULO 2017 Autorizo a reprodução e divulgação total ou parcial deste trabalho, por qualquer meio convencional ou eletrônico, para fins de estudo e pesquisa, desde que citada a fonte. Catalogação na Publicação Serviço de Biblioteca e Documentação Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas da Universidade de São Paulo Ferreira, Paulo Fernando Tadeu F383c Chrysippus on Fate, Effective Exhortation, and Desert / Paulo Fernando Tadeu Ferreira ; orientador Marco Antonio de Avila Zingano. - São Paulo, 2017. 138 f. Tese (Doutorado)- Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas da Universidade de São Paulo. Departamento de Filosofia. Área de concentração: Filosofia. 1. Chrysippus. 2. Fate. 3. Exhortation. 4. Punishment. I. Zingano, Marco Antonio de Avila, orient. II. Título. ACCEPTANCE PAGE FERREIRA, P.F.T. 2017. Chrysippus on Fate, Effective Exhortation, and Desert. Revised Version. PhD Thesis. Faculty of Philosophy, Languages, and Human Sciences. Department of Philosophy, University of São Paulo, 2017. Approved in: ____/____/____ Examining Committee: Prof.
    [Show full text]