DOCSLIB.ORG

Virtuous Life and Happiness in Epictetus, Socrates and Stoicism

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Virtuous Life and Happiness in Epictetus, Socrates and Stoicism VIRTUOUS LIFE AND HAPPINESS IN EPICTETUS, SOCRATES AND STOICISM A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY +h/<$.$+9(&ø IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY MAY 2015 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof.'U0HOLKD$OWXQÕúÕN Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts. 3URI'Uù+DOLO7XUDQ Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts. 3URI'Uù+DOLO7XUDQ Supervisor Examining Committee Members AVVRF3URI'U(UWX÷UXO57uran (Ankara U., Phil.) $VVRF3URI'U(OLIdÕUDNPDQ (METU, Phil.) 3URI'Uù+DOLO7XUDQ(METU, Phil.) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Signature : iii ABSTRACT VIRTUOUS LIFE AND HAPPINESS IN EPICTETUS, SOCRATES & STOICISM Kahveci, Hülya M.A., Department of Philosophy Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Ş.Halil Turan May 2015, 107 pages In this M.A. thesis, Epictetus‘ philosophy about virtuous life and happiness will be investigated. His philosophy is shaped by the thoughts of Socrates and Stoicism, therefore, before his main thoughts Socrates‘ and Stoic‘s philosophy under the scope of happiness will be analyzed. Firstly, the focus will be on Socrates‘ philosophy of happiness, but before that, in order to pull the reader out of the blurry thoughts about historical Socrates and Platonic Socrates dilemma, I will try to prove that Socrates has basic ideas on happiness benefitting from different dialogues and writers. Then, with the Stoic views, the acceptance about passion and pleasures are the blockage of virtue actions will be presented. Finally, I will scrutinize the teachings of Epictetus which will show to the reader that a life which is subjected to passion and pleasures cannot be labeled as happiness. Keywords: Happiness, virtue, freedom, passion, pleasures. iv ÖZ EPİKTETOS, SOKRATES VE STOA‘DA ERDEMLİ YAŞAM VE MUTLULUK Kahveci, Hülya Yüksek Lisans, Felsefe Bölümü Tez Yöneticisi: Prof. Dr. Ş. Halil Turan Mayıs 2015, 107 sayfa Bu Yüksek Lisans tezinde, Epiktetos‘un erdemli yaşam ve mutluluk felsefesi anlatılacaktır. Epiktetos‘un felsefesini incelemeden önce, onun fikirlerinin ve felsefesinin temelini oluşturan Sokrates ve Stoacılık tanıtılacaktır. Sokratesin mutluluk ile ilgili felsefesinden bahsetmeden önce, okuyucuyu tarihi Sokrates ve Platocu Sokrates belirsizliğinden çıkarmak adına, farklı diyalog ve yazarlardan faydalanarak, Sokrates‘in mutluluk ve erdemli yaşam ile ilgili temelde aynı düşüncelere sahip olduğunu kanıtlamaya çalışacağım. Ardından Stoacı düşünceyle birlikte, haz ve tutkuların ahlak ve mutluluğu engellediğinin kabulünü ortaya koyup, Epiktetos‘un haz ve tutkulara tabi bir hayatla mutluluğun mümkün olmadığını anlatan öğretilerini inceleyeceğim. Anahtar Kelimeler: Mutluluk, erdem, özgürlük, tutku, hazlar. v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This study was performed under the supervision of Prof. Dr. Ş. Halil Turan. I would like to express my gratitude for his support and guidance. I also thank Assist. Prof. Dr. Elif Çırakman and Assist. Prof. Dr. Ertuğrul Rufayi Turan for their suggestions and valuable comments on this research. Thank you Mom, Hürrem Sultan, I am the luckiest human being for being your little one. Like in the last conversation of ours, I love you, five times. Thank you Dad, Beşiktaşlı Ustura Necati, you are the role model of this research, history can label you as another sage-men with no doubts at all. Thank you my sisters for being there for me and supporting me all the time. Thank you all my teachers and friends for the beauty of your soul and the sincerity of your smile. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS PLAGIARISM .................................................................................................. iii ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................... iv ÖZ ....................................................................................................................... v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................. vii CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 1 2. HISTORICAL SOCRATES VS PLATONIC SOCRATES ................... 5 2.1 Characterization of Socrates.............................................................. 5 2.2 The main themes in dialogues ........................................................... 8 3. SOCRATIC APPROACH TO PLEASURES ....................................... 26 3.1 Protagoras ....................................................................................... 26 3.2 Gorgias ............................................................................................ 29 3.3 Phaedo ............................................................................................. 32 3.4 Alcibiades 1 ..................................................................................... 35 3.5 The Symposium ................................................................................ 37 3.6 The Republic .................................................................................... 39 3.7 Philebus ........................................................................................... 41 4. STOICISM ............................................................................................ 46 4.1 Cosmos ............................................................................................ 47 4.2 Reason ............................................................................................. 49 4.3 Virtue ............................................................................................... 50 4.4 Knowledge and Problem of Externals ............................................. 52 vii 4.5 Sage Man ......................................................................................... 57 4.6 The Art of Living ............................................................................ 57 4.6.1 What is to be done? ................................................................... 59 4.6.2 How do we do it? ....................................................................... 59 4.7 Legacy; To and From ...................................................................... 60 5. A STOIC MORALIST WITH SOCRATIC MARKS: EPICTETUS ... 62 5.1 Dialogues, Elenchus and a Didactic Teacher .................................. 66 5.2 Moral Purpose ................................................................................. 68 5.3 Problem of External Impressions .................................................... 73 5.4 Three Fields of Study ...................................................................... 74 5.5 Dealing with External Impressions ................................................. 79 5.6 Philosopher‘s Task .......................................................................... 81 6. CONCLUSION ..................................................................................... 84 REFERENCES .................................................................................................. 88 APPENDICES A. TURKISH SUMMARY ......................................................................... 95 B. TEZ FOTOKOPİ İZİN FORMU ...................................................... ... 107 viii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION The meaning and usage of happiness in modern times differs from the ancient one. People in modern societies hold an understanding of happiness that represents a materialistic view. For modern people, an individual‘s degree of happiness is defined by the assets that the person has or by the power that she or he holds in society. A closer inquiry reveals an abundance of examples that demonstrate how pervasive this conception of happiness is. For example, when evaluating the happiness of a mature woman or man, one factor frequently taken into consideration is success or failure in marrying and starting a family. Likewise, when an undergraduate student‘s understanding of happiness is scrutinized, likely answers involve graduating successfully, getting a job with a perfect salary after college, and increasing one‘s standard of living by acquiring more and more material assets. In addition to defining happiness in terms of material things and social position, modern people also conceive of happiness as a temporary state. Both of these views on happiness are shaped by a materialistic perspective, one that is radically criticized by the ancient Greek philosophers. The ancient Greek philosophers regard happiness with different attitudes and ideas. First of all, they hold that eudaimonia–a key term that refers to happiness with relation to the virtues and the fulfillment of human nature–can be achieved only over a complete lifetime. Ancient philosophers share three main ideas regarding eudaimonia: 1 that it results from virtuous actions; that these actions must be integrated with rational principles; and that they must be carried out not only for one‘s inward
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Socratic Dialogue: Teaching Patients to Become Their Own Cognitive Therapist
    National Crime Victims Center > Socratic Method > Socratic Dialogue Print This Page Socratic Dialogue: Teaching Patients to Become Their Own Cognitive Therapist “The unexamined life is not worth living.” Socrates (469 BC – 399 BC) Socratic dialogue is a foundational skill used by CPT therapists to help patients examine their lives, challenge maladaptive thoughts, address stuckpoints, and develop critical thinking skills. Socratic dialogue is derived from the work of the Greek philosopher, Socrates, who developed what is now called the Socratic method of teaching. In traditional education, the teacher is presumed to know more than the student, and the role of the teacher is to transmit the teacher’s knowledge to the student. In contrast, Socrates believed that the role of the teacher should not be to tell students what the “truth” is but to help them discover the truth themselves through a collaborative process of asking questions. By asking a series of questions designed to get the student to identify logical contradictions in their positions and/or evidence that does not support their thoughts, the Socratic method is designed to help the student discover the “truth” for themselves as opposed to being told what the “truth” is by the teacher. Socrates also thought this teaching method was superior because it teaches students the skill of critical thinking, a skill they can use throughout their lives. Another advantage of this method is that students are more likely to value knowledge if they discover it themselves than if someone tells them about it. In CPT, the purpose of Socratic questioning by the therapist is to prompt the patient to examine the accuracy of maladaptive thoughts that are causing psychological distress.
    [Show full text]
  • The Philosophy of Happiness: an Interdisciplinary Introduction
    “This outstanding book is the introduction to happiness many of us have been waiting for: Clear and accessible, engaging, and remarkably comprehensive. It covers not just the philosophy of happiness but also the science, economics, and policy side of happiness, as well as practical issues about how to be happier, and includes non-Western approaches as well. It is the single best overview of research on happiness, and I strongly recommend it both for the classroom and for researchers wanting to learn more about the field, as well as anyone wishing to understand the state of the art in thinking about happiness.” Daniel M. Haybron, Saint Louis University “An engaging and wide-ranging introduction to the study of happiness. The book’s perspective is philosophical, and it would be an excellent choice for philosophy courses in ethics or happiness itself. The philosophy here is enriched by well-informed discussions of research in psychology, neuroscience, and economics, which makes it a very fine choice for courses in any field where there is an interest in a philosopher’s take on happiness. Indeed, anyone with an interest in happiness—whether or not they are teaching or taking a course—would profit from reading this book. Highly recommended!” Valerie Tiberius, University of Minnesota THE PHILOSOPHY OF HAPPINESS Emerging research on the subject of happiness—in psychology, economics, and public policy—reawakens and breathes new life into long-standing philosophi- cal questions about happiness (e.g., What is it? Can it really be measured or pursued? What is its relationship to morality?). By analyzing this research from a philosophical perspective, Lorraine L.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhetorics of Stoic Philosophy in Eighteenth-Century Discourses of Sentiment
    Out of Closets: Rhetorics of Stoic Philosophy in Eighteenth-Century Discourses of Sentiment Randall Cream The Spectator was one of those cultural icons whose importance was obvious even as it was being established. While it was not the first popular broadsheet to captivate its London readership, the Spectator proved to be a powerful voice in the rapid transformation of London culture in the early decades of the eighteenth century. In their publication of the Spectator, Joseph Addison and Richard Steele were able to substantially affect the eighteenth-century marketplace of ideas by regularizing the cultivation of morality as central to this milieu. Within the pages of the Spectator, morality emerges as a reciprocal relationship between virtuous individuals and a just civil society, forging a bridge between public good and private virtue while retaining the separate categories.1 As Alan McKenzie notes, the Spectator’s focus on social relations as a proper ethical sphere coincides with its function “of inculcating classical values and morals for a new, partly financial and mercantile public” (89).2 McKenzie’s work analyzes the complex relationship developed between the Spectator and its reader, a relationship that characterizes moral instruction, social connections, and self-understanding as “‘humanizing’ this new public” (89). But we can go further. One function of the Spectator’s specific combination of an ethics of interiority and a socialized network of moral relationships is the articulation of a subjectivity characterized by affective performance and self-restraint. This curious subjectivity, profoundly eighteenth-century in its split focus, is intricately linked to the discourses that compose the Spectator.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Values and Happiness: an East–West Dialogue
    The Journal of Social Psychology, 2001, 141(4), 477–493 Cultural Values and Happiness: An East–West Dialogue LUO LU Graduate Institute of Behavioural Sciences Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan ROBIN GILMOUR Department of Psychology University of Lancaster, United Kingdom SHU-FANG KAO Graduate Institute of Behavioural Sciences Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan ABSTRACT. Happiness as a state of mind may be universal, but its meaning is complex and ambiguous. The authors directly examined the relationships between cultural values and experiences of happiness in 2 samples, by using a measurement of values derived from Chinese culture and a measurement of subjective well-being balanced for sources of happiness salient in both the East and the West. The participants were university stu- dents—439 from an Eastern culture (Taiwan) and 344 from a Western culture (the United Kingdom). Although general patterns were similar in the 2 samples, the relationships between values and happiness were stronger in the Taiwanese sample than in the British sample. The values social integration and human-heartedness had culture-dependent effects on happiness, whereas the value Confucian work dynamism had a culture-general effect on happiness. Key words: British university students, Eastern cultural values, happiness, Taiwanese uni- versity students, Western cultural values FOR CENTURIES, scholars in many disciplines have studied happiness, or sub- jective well-being (SWB), and have defined it in ethical, theological, political, economic, and psychological terms (Diener, 1984; Veenhoven, 1984). Happiness is currently defined (a) as a predominance of positive over negative affect and (b) as satisfaction with life as a whole (Argyle, Martin, & Crossland, 1989; Diener).
    [Show full text]
  • Plato's Euthydemus
    PLATO’S EUTHYDEMUS: A STUDY ON THE RELATIONS BETWEEN LOGIC AND EDUCATION Plato’s Euthydemus is an unlucky dialogue. Few dealt with it in its own right, not just as part of a wider discussion of Plato, and fewer still saw in it more than a topic of sophistic fallacies. Some, of course, paid attention to the constructive sections of the dialogue, but only rarely do we come across a real attempt to unify its different aspects.1 In this paper I propose to show how, in the Euthydemus, Plato tries to distinguish between the Socratic and the Sophistic conceptions of education, by tracing them to their roots in the opposing views of the Sophists — and especially those of the second generation — and of Socrates about truth and about the role of logic. And although the eristic techniques of Euthydemus and Dionysodorus are obviously fallacious, they turn out to be developments of Protagoras’ views and follow from philosophical positions worthy of serious examination. The Euthydemus is a caricature, to be sure. But, as all good caricature, it has a serious intent. It sketches the degeneration of the Sophistic approach to education, in some of its aspects. More important­ ly, it distinguishes Socratic education from the methods and effects of its Sophistic counterpart. Euthydemus and Dionysodorus, the two sophist brothers, are reminis­ cent of the great Sophists of the Protagoras in more than one way. They are polymaths like Hippias, and at one time or another have taught a variety of arts, from forensic rhetoric to armed combat. Also, they have Prodicus’ penchant for linguistic analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Induction in the Socratic Tradition John P
    Induction in the Socratic Tradition John P. McCaskey Stanford University Abstract: Aristotle said that induction (epagǀgƝ) is a proceeding from particulars to a universal, and the definition has been conventional ever since. But there is an ambiguity here. Induction in the Scholastic and the (so-called) Humean tradition has presumed that Aristotle meant going from particular statements to universal statements. But the alternate view, namely that Aristotle meant going from particular things to universal ideas, prevailed all through antiquity and then again from the time of Francis Bacon until the mid-nineteenth century. Recent scholarship is so steeped in the first-mentioned tradition that we have virtually forgotten the other. In this essay McCaskey seeks to recover that alternate tradition, a tradition whose leading theoreticians were William Whewell, Francis Bacon, Socrates, and in fact Aristotle himself. The examination is both historical and philosophical. The first part of the essay fills out the history. The latter part examines the most mature of the philosophies in the Socratic tradition, specifically Bacon’s and Whewell’s. After tracing out this tradition, McCaskey shows how this alternate view of induction is indeed employed in science, as exemplified by several instances taken from actual scientific practice. In this manner, McCaskey proposes to us that the Humean problem of induction is merely an artifact of a bad conception of induction and that a return to the Socratic conception might be warranted. Introduction Aristotle said that induction (epagǀgƝ) is a proceeding from particulars to a universal, and the definition has been conventional ever since. But there is an ambiguity here.
    [Show full text]
  • Applying the Socratic Method to the Problem Solving Process
    American Journal of Business Education – August 2009 Volume 2, Number 5 Socratic Problem-Solving In The Business World Evan Peterson, University Of Detroit Mercy, USA ABSTRACT Accurate and effective decision-making is one of the most essential skills necessary for organizational success. The problem-solving process provides a systematic means of effectively recognizing, analyzing, and solving a dilemma. The key element in this process is critical analysis of the situation, which can be executed by a taking a Socratic approach to the situation. Applying the Socratic Method to the problem-solving model ensures a well-rounded and versatile analysis. Keywords: Problem-solving process, decision- making, critical analysis, Socratic Method INTRODUCTION he sheer complexity of today’s business organization is rivaled only by the complexity of the business environment in which it operates. The permutation of complexity and exacting time constraints companies and individuals face in making vital decisions involving thousands of people Tand millions of dollars can seem more daunting than storming the beaches of Normandy. However, all hope is not lost. The anxiety, along with the blood, sweat, and tears that come along with difficult decision-making can be reduced by having a clear, time-tested plan of attack that can be applied to the problem situation. The problem-solving model is one such plan of attack, for it provides a framework that an individual decision-maker or group of decision-makers can follow to reach a feasible solution to the problem. Situational analysis is the bread and butter of the problem-solving model, for it goes hand-in-hand with each step of the model.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stoics and the Practical: a Roman Reply to Aristotle
    DePaul University Via Sapientiae College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences 8-2013 The Stoics and the practical: a Roman reply to Aristotle Robin Weiss DePaul University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd Recommended Citation Weiss, Robin, "The Stoics and the practical: a Roman reply to Aristotle" (2013). College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations. 143. https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd/143 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE STOICS AND THE PRACTICAL: A ROMAN REPLY TO ARISTOTLE A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August, 2013 BY Robin Weiss Department of Philosophy College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences DePaul University Chicago, IL - TABLE OF CONTENTS - Introduction……………………..............................................................................................................p.i Chapter One: Practical Knowledge and its Others Technê and Natural Philosophy…………………………….....……..……………………………….....p. 1 Virtue and technical expertise conflated – subsequently distinguished in Plato – ethical knowledge contrasted with that of nature in
    [Show full text]
  • Augustine's Criticisms of the Stoic Theory of Passions
    Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers Volume 20 Issue 4 Article 3 10-1-2003 Augustine's Criticisms of the Stoic Theory of Passions T.H. Irwin Follow this and additional works at: https://place.asburyseminary.edu/faithandphilosophy Recommended Citation Irwin, T.H. (2003) "Augustine's Criticisms of the Stoic Theory of Passions," Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers: Vol. 20 : Iss. 4 , Article 3. DOI: 10.5840/faithphil20032043 Available at: https://place.asburyseminary.edu/faithandphilosophy/vol20/iss4/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers by an authorized editor of ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange. AUGUSTINE'S CRITICISMS OF THE STOIC THEORY OF PASSIONS T.H.Irwin Augustine defends three claims about the passions: (1) The Stoic position dif­ fers only verbally from the Platonic-Aristotelian position. (2) The Stoic position is wrong and the Platonic-Aristotelian position is right. (3) The will is engaged in the different passions; indeed the different passions are different expressions of the will. The first two claims, properly understood, are defensible. But the most plausible versions of them give us good reason to doubt the third claim. 1. A full exploration of Augustine's reflexions on the nature of the passions would introduce us to some of his central moral and theological concems. I do not intend to undertake this full exploration. I want to discuss his claim about the proper interpretation of the Stoic conception of the passions in relation to the Platonic and Aristotelian view.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the Philosophy of the Human Person Quarter 2 - Module 8: the Meaning of His/Her Own Life
    Republic of the Philippines Department of Education Regional Office IX, Zamboanga Peninsula 12 Zest for Progress Zeal of Partnership Introduction to the Philosophy of the Human Person Quarter 2 - Module 8: The Meaning of His/Her Own Life Name of Learner: ___________________________ Grade & Section: ___________________________ Name of School: ___________________________ WHAT I NEED TO KNOW? An unexamined life is a life not worth living (Plato). Man alone of all creatures is a moral being. He is endowed with the great gift of freedom of choice in his actions, yet because of this, he is responsible for his own freely chosen acts, his conduct. He distinguishes between right and wrong, good and bad in human behavior. He can control his own passions. He is the master of himself, the sculptor of his own life and destiny. (Montemayor) In the new normal that we are facing right now, we can never stop our determination to learn from life. ―Kung gusto nating matuto maraming paraan, kung ayaw naman, sa anong dahilan?‖ I shall present to you different philosophers who advocated their age in solving ethical problems and issues, besides, even imparted their age on how wonderful and meaningful life can be. Truly, philosophy may not teach us how to earn a living yet, it can show to us that life is worth existing. It is evident that even now their legacy continues to create impact as far as philosophy and ethics is concerned. This topic: Reflect on the meaning of his/her own life, will help you understand the value and meaning of life since it contains activities that may help you reflect the true meaning and value of one’s living in a critical and philosophical way.
    [Show full text]
  • EPICTETUS AS SOCRATIC MENTOR1 in Tom Wolfe's Most Recent Novel, a Man in Full, a Young Californian, Down on His Luck, Converts A
    EPICTETUS AS SOCRATIC MENTOR1 In Tom Wolfe's most recent novel, A Man In Full, a young Californian, down on his luck, converts a macho sixty-year old tycoon, facing financial ruin, to Stoicism.2 The young man, Conrad, has miraculously escaped from the Santa Rita gaol as a result of an earthquake. Shortly before, he had discovered Epictetus in a book called The Stoics, a book he had been sent mistakenly in place of a riveting thriller by his favourite author with the title, The Stoics' Game. He rapidly comes across this passage: T [Zeus] gave you a portion of our divinity, a spark from our own fire, the power to act and not to act, the will to get and the will to avoid. If you pay heed to this, you will not groan, you will blame no man, you will flatter none' (p. 398). Conrad is hooked. An innocent among a bunch of hideous felons, he asks himself: 'What would Epictetus have done with this bunch? What could he have done? How could you apply his lessons two thousand years later, in this grimy gray pod, this pigsty full of beasts who grunted about mother-fuckin this and mother-fuckin that?' (p. 410). Conrad memorises chunks of Epictetus. He refers a series of challenges to Zeus, overcomes a thug twice his size, and radiates Stoic strength. At the end, hired as a male nurse in Atlanta for the massive but now ailing Croker, the about-to-be ruined tycoon, Conrad tells Croker about the Stoic Zeus and Epictetus.
    [Show full text]
  • Aeschynē in Aristotle's Conception of Human Nature Melissa Marie Coakley University of South Florida, [email protected]
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 3-20-2014 Aeschynē in Aristotle's Conception of Human Nature Melissa Marie Coakley University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Philosophy Commons Scholar Commons Citation Coakley, Melissa Marie, "Aeschynē in Aristotle's Conception of Human Nature" (2014). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/4999 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Aeschynē in Aristotle’s Conception of Human Nature by Melissa M. Coakley A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy College of Arts and Science University of South Florida Major Professor: Joanne Waugh, Ph.D. Bruce Silver, Ph.D. Roger Ariew, Ph.D. Thomas Williams, Ph.D. Date of Approval: March 20, 2014 Keywords: Shame, Anaeschyntia, Aidōs, Aischynē, Ancient Greek Passions Copyright © 2014, Melissa M. Coakley DEDICATION This manuscript is dedicated to my husband Bill Murray and to my parents: Joan and Richard Coakley. Thank you for your endless support, encouragement, and friendship. To Dr. John P. Anton, I have learned from you the importance of having a “ton of virtue and a shield of nine layers for protection from the abysmal depths of vice.” Thank you for believing in me, my dear friend.
    [Show full text]