DOCSLIB.ORG

Project Synopsis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Project Synopsis Final Draft Transportation Master Plan Update Study Rapid Transit and Transit Priority Development Report Submitted to City of Ottawa by IBI Group in association with Morrison Hershfield September 2013 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Objectives ............................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Approach ............................................................................................................. 2 2. Policy Guidance and Context .............................................................. 3 2.1 Transit Facility Types ......................................................................................... 3 2.2 Implications of Time Savings ............................................................................ 7 2.2.1 Mode Choice and Land Use ................................................................................. 7 2.2.2 Operating Costs .................................................................................................... 8 3. Modelling the Transit Network ............................................................ 9 3.1 Land Use .............................................................................................................. 9 3.2 Operating Speed ............................................................................................... 10 3.3 Service Headway ............................................................................................... 11 3.4 Routes ................................................................................................................ 11 4. Developing the 2031 RTTP Network Concept .................................. 13 4.1 Corridors from the 2008 TMP ........................................................................... 13 4.2 LRT Extension to Orléans ................................................................................ 15 4.3 North-South Rapid Transit ............................................................................... 20 4.4 Western LRT ...................................................................................................... 25 4.5 LRT Extension to Bayshore ............................................................................. 27 4.6 Interprovincial Rapid Transit ........................................................................... 28 4.7 The 2031 RTTP Network Concept .................................................................... 30 5. Assessing the 2031 Network Concept .............................................. 37 5.1 Overall Performance ......................................................................................... 37 5.2 Rapid Transit Corridors .................................................................................... 38 5.2.1 Ridership ............................................................................................................. 39 5.2.2 Land Use ............................................................................................................. 42 SEPTEMBER 2013 I IBI GROUP/MH FINAL DRAFT - RAPID TRANSIT AND TRANSIT PRIORITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT Table of Contents (cont’d) 5.2.3 Capital Costs ....................................................................................................... 42 5.2.4 Aggregate Performance ...................................................................................... 47 5.3 Transit Priority Corridors ................................................................................. 50 5.3.1 Ridership ............................................................................................................. 50 5.3.2 Land Use ............................................................................................................. 52 5.3.3 Traffic Congestion ............................................................................................... 52 5.3.4 Ease of Implementation ...................................................................................... 55 5.3.5 Aggregate Performance ...................................................................................... 55 5.3.6 Capital Costs ....................................................................................................... 58 6. The Affordable Network ..................................................................... 62 6.1 Affordability Envelope ...................................................................................... 62 6.2 Network Development ...................................................................................... 62 6.3 Lifecycle Costs .................................................................................................. 68 6.3.1 Operating and Maintenance Costs and Savings ................................................ 69 6.3.2 Rehabilitation Costs ............................................................................................ 69 7. Conclusions and Recommendations................................................ 70 List of Figures Figure 1.1 – Transit Network Development Process ................................................................. 2 Figure 2.1 – Type and Degree of Impacts by Facility Type ...................................................... 7 Figure 2.2 – Capital and Operating Cost Implications of Delay ................................................ 8 Figure 3.1 – Population and Employment Estimates by Market—2008 TMP vs. 2031 TMP ...................................................................................................................... 9 Figure 4.1 –Transit Network from 2008 TMP .......................................................................... 14 Figure 4.2 – Orléans Rapid Transit Alternatives ..................................................................... 17 Figure 4.3 – Refined North-South Rapid Transit Alternatives ................................................. 23 Figure 4.4 – Preferred Western LRT Alignment ...................................................................... 26 Figure 4.5 – Recommended Regional Transit Network (post-2031) ....................................... 29 Figure 4.6 – Rapid Transit and Transit Priority Network – 2031 Network Concept ................ 31 Figure 5.1 – Land Use Densities Along Rapid Transit Corridors ............................................ 43 Figure 5.2 – Rapid Transit Network—Combined Scores ........................................................ 49 Figure 5.3 – Projected Average Transit Ridership by Transit Priority Corridor ....................... 51 Figure 5.4 – Future Land Use Activity by Transit Priority Corridor .......................................... 53 Figure 5.5 – Transit Priority Corridors: Congestion Index (Updates pending) ........................ 54 Figure 5.6 – Transit Priority Corridors: Combined Scores ...................................................... 57 Figure 6.1 – Affordable Transit Network.................................................................................. 63 IBI GROUP/MH FINAL DRAFT - RAPID TRANSIT AND TRANSIT PRIORITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT Table of Contents (cont’d) List of Tables Table 2.1 – Transit Facility Planning Guidelines ....................................................................... 5 Table 2.2 – Transit Facility Examples ....................................................................................... 6 Table 3.1 – Transit Travel Time Functions for Various Facility Types .................................... 10 Table 3.2 – Modelled Headways by Transit Line .................................................................... 11 Table 4.1 – Orléans Rapid Transit Scenario Comparison ...................................................... 18 Table 4.2 – Refined Orléans Rapid Transit Scenarios ............................................................ 19 Table 4.3 – North-South Rapid Transit Alternatives ................................................................ 21 Table 4.4 – Refined North-South Rapid Transit Scenarios ..................................................... 24 Table 4.5 – 2031 Network Concept: Rapid Transit Elements ................................................. 32 Table 4.6 –2031 Network Concept: Transit Priority Elements ................................................ 33 Table 5.1 – TMP Network Improvement Impacts .................................................................... 37 Table 5.2 –AM Peak Period Ridership Estimates for Rapid Transit Corridors: 2031 Network Concept ................................................................................................ 40 Table 5.3 – Summary of Unit Prices for Rapid Transit Projects .............................................. 44 Table 5.4 – Rapid Transit Capital Cost Summary ................................................................... 46 Table 5.5 – Assessment Framework for Rapid Transit Corridors ........................................... 48 Table 5.6 – Assessment Framework for Transit Priority Corridors ......................................... 56 Table 5.7 – Infrastructure Assumptions by Facility Type ........................................................ 58 Table 5.8 – Transit Priority Capital Cost Summary ................................................................. 59 Table 6.1 – Affordability Envelope by Project Element ........................................................... 62 Table 6.2
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Marketbeat Retail Snapshot
    MARKETBEAT RETAIL SNAPSHOT OTTAWA, ON Q2 2014 A Cushman & Wakefield Alliance Research Publication ECONOMIC OVERVIEW In terms of retail construction, the largest projects are the Rideau Employers in the National Capital Region Centre and Bayshore Shopping Centre expansions, worth $360 added approximately 5,100 people to their million and $200 million respectively. In addition, Tangier Factory payrolls in May 2014, resulting in the Outlet Centres is spending $120 million to build its 350,000-square unemployment rate decreasing by 0.1 foot (sf) outlet mall. Looking to retail sales, growth in consumer percentage points to 6.7%. The public retail sales in 2013 was 1.7% for the region. This is expected to administration sector rebounded slightly, with the number of public accelerate to 2.7% in 2014, with growth reaching 3.5% in 2015. servants increasing by 3,600 in May compared to April, although still down by 5,600 year-over-year. An emerging story continues to be ECONOMIC INDICATORS the strengthening of the high-tech sector. Statistics Canada recently reported that there were 65,200 tech employees in Ottawa-Gatineau. REGIONAL 2013 2014F 2015F If this figure is accurate, then this sector is certainly on the mend, as GDP Growth 0.1% 0.9% 1.9% employment numbers in May 2013 totaled 49,700. The timing of this CPI Growth 1.0% 1.2% 2.0% recovery could not be better, as the local economy has slowed over the past couple of years, largely a result of federal government Retail Sales Growth 1.7% 2.7% 3.5% downsizing.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 5 Station Descriptions And
    Appendix 5 Station Descriptions and Technical Overview Stage 2 light rail transit (LRT) stations will follow the same standards, design principles, and connectivity and mobility requirements as Stage 1 Confederation Line. Proponent Teams were instructed, through the guidelines outlined in the Project Agreement (PA), to design stations that will integrate with Stage 1, which include customer facilities, accessibility features, and the ability to support the City’s Transportation Master Plan (TMP) goals for public transit and ridership growth. The station features planned for the Stage 2 LRT Project will be designed and built on these performance standards which include: Barrier-free path of travel to entrances of stations; Accessible fare gates at each entrance, providing easy access for customers using mobility devices or service animals; Tactile wayfinding tiles will trace the accessible route through the fare gates, to elevators, platforms and exits; Transecure waiting areas on the train platform will include accessible benches and tactile/Braille signs indicating the direction of service; Tactile warning strips and inter-car barriers to keep everyone safely away from the platform edge; Audio announcements and visual displays for waiting passengers will precede each train’s arrival on the platform and will describe the direction of travel; Service alerts will be shown visually on the passenger information display monitors and announced audibly on the public-address system; All wayfinding and safety signage will be provided following the applicable accessibility standards (including type size, tactile signage, and appropriate colour contrast); Clear, open sight lines and pedestrian design that make wayfinding simple and intuitive; and, Cycling facilities at all stations including shelter for 80 per cent of the provided spaces, with additional space protected to ensure cycling facilities can be doubled and integrated into the station’s footprint.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Faqs__Transit Service During Confed Line
    Transit Service During Confederation Line Construction – Updates for 2016 REPORT TRANSIT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT FAQs REPORT Transit Service During Confederation Line Construction – Updates for 2016 TITLE DIVISION: Customer Systems and Planning BRANCH Service Planning REPORT Pat Scrimgeour, Assistant General Manager, Customer Date: January 26, 2016 AUTHOR Systems and Planning SCHEDULED DATES FOR REPORT GM’s REVIEW OF REPORT TRANSIT COMMISSION COUNCIL January 19, 2016 February 17, 2016 N/A Q1. How long will the Confederation Line construction service adjustments last for? What are the next phases for service adjustments? A1. The O-Train Confederation Line is scheduled to open in 2018. Service adjustments will take place in sequential phases as sections of the Transitway undergo construction work. Each section of Transitway that closes for conversion to light rail will never reopen for bus operations. The remaining Transitway closures are: • April 2016 – Laurier Station to Lees Station; and • June 2016 – Tunney's Pasture Station to Merton Street. Timelines will be updated as information becomes available. Service adjustment plans will be implemented as these closures take effect. Stations will remain open during the construction period, with the exceptions of Cyrville Station, which was closed in June 2015, and Campus Station, which will close in April 2016. Q2. What are the main highlights of upcoming transit service adjustments during Confederation Line Construction? A2. The following are the main highlights of upcoming transit service adjustments during O- Train Confederation Line Construction: • On April 24, 2016, the Transitway will close between Laurier Station and Lees Station. Most transit service along this section of the Transitway will be relocated to Nicholas Street and Highway 417, using the bus-only lanes that have been built for this purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Open House #1 Barrhaven Light Rail Transit
    NOTICE OF OPEN HOUSE #1 BARRHAVEN LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (BASELINE STATION TO BARRHAVEN TOWN CENTRE) AND RAIL GRADE-SEPARATIONS PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STUDY (TPAP) Wednessday October 30, 2019 Nepean Sportsplex, Richmond Ballroom Please use entrance #4 1701 Woodroffe Ave 6 to 8:30 pm Presentation 7 pm The City of Ottawa has initiated the Barrhaven Light Rail Transit (Baseline Station to Barrhaven Town Centre) and Rail Grade-Separations Planning and Environmental Assessment (EA) Study to develop a Recommended Plan for extending Light Rail Transit (LRT) from Baseline Station to Barrhaven Town Centre, as well as grade-separations of Woodroffe Avenue, Southwest Transitway and Fallowfield Road where these corridors cross the VIA Rail line. The study area is approximately 10 km in length and illustrated in the key map. The EA study is being conducted in accordance with the Transit Project Assessment Process (TPAP) Ontario Regulation 231/08 in accordance with the Ontario Environmental Assessment Act. The study process will involve developing and evaluating alternatives, leading to a Recommended Plan in consideration of the surrounding environmental (social, natural, physical and economic) conditions. There will be ongoing public consultation activities during the course of the study. This first Open House will provide: • An overview of the study objectives, need and opportunities, existing conditions and study progress to-date • Design options for the LRT alignment from Baseline Station to the Nepean Sportsplex, • A preliminary plan to convert the Southwest Transitway to LRT from the Nepean Sportsplex to Barrhaven Town Centre including rail grade-separations of Woodroffe Avenue, Southwest Transitway and Fallowfield Road, and • Next steps Yo ur participation in the Open House is an important component of the study where you can discuss the project with the study team and provide feedback.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Commission
    Transit Commission Tax Supported Programs Tabled November 8, 2017 Table of Contents Transit Commission Briefing Note......................................................................................................................................................................1 Operating Resource Requirement.....................................................................................................................................3 User Fees..........................................................................................................................................................................4 Capital Program Funding Summary..................................................................................................................................7 Supplemental Operating & Capital Information.................................................................................................................9 Analysis..................................................................................................................................................................9 Explanatory Notes................................................................................................................................................10 Capital Budget.....................................................................................................................................................12 Project Details..........................................................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Uptown Rideau STREET COMMUNITY DESIGN PLAN Draft V2 - November 2015
    UPTOWN RIDEAU STREET COMMUNITY DESIGN PLAN Draft v2 - November 2015 City of Ottawa Planning and Growth Management Ottawa.ca/planning Ottawa.ca/urbanisme CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ............................................................... 5 4.0 The Plan .................................................................... 51 1.1 What is a Community Design Plan? ....................................................... 7 4.1 General Approach ................................................................................ 52 1.2 2005 Uptown Rideau CDP ...................................................................... 7 4.2 Vision, Core Principles and Key Directions ............................................. 52 1.3 How to Use This CDP ............................................................................. 7 4.3 Built Form ............................................................................................ 54 1.4 The CDP Area ......................................................................................... 8 4.4 Open Space .......................................................................................... 68 1.5 Study Process ......................................................................................... 8 4.5 Mobility .............................................................................................. 74 1.6 As We Heard It .................................................................................... 10 4.6 Heritage ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Project Timelines Issue 2.0 for May 16, 2018 Nov, 2008 Transportation Master Plan Update and Nov., 2013 New Transportation Master Plan
    Transit Project Timelines Issue 2.0 for May 16, 2018 Nov, 2008 Transportation Master Plan Update and Nov., 2013 New Transportation Master Plan BRT to Kanata LRT Stage 1 LRT Stage 2 Baseline Road Rapid ( “the West Transitway “Confederation Line” (three extensions to the Transit Corridor Extension”) (Blair to Tunney’s Pasture) Confederation Line) (Heron to Bayshore) Extensions to Trillium Line are another project - Nov. 2008 - decision to - Jan. 2010 EA approved study Bayshore to Moodie extension - Oct. 2012 “West - In 2011 council Transitway Extension” accelerated completion EPR approved (also date by a year referred to in Stage 2 - Dec. 2012 contract documents) awarded - 2013 construction begins - 2013 project approved - Sep. 2015 bridge over HA - Feb 2017 - decision to postponed to LRT stage 2 study Bayshore to Moodie - Moodie Bridge safety extension improvements postponed - June 2016 Rideau St. sinkhole - summer 2017 RFP sent out - June 2017 meetings about - Until fall 2017 LRT was to - fall 2017 Bayshore to - fall 2017 EPR approved Moodie extension have ended at Bayshore Moodie LRT extension - fall 2017 approved - After 2017 LRT (stage 2) approved ends at Moodie - Dec. 2017 Bayshore to Moodie extension open as part of bus route - CBLCA continues to work - Feb. 2018 EPR approved with city and contractors - July-Nov, 2018 Corkstown end of Nov. 2018 Blair to - Q4, 2018? Stage 2 contract sidewalk construction Tunney’s Pasture LRT to be awarded open - 2019 plan to start - 2020 “construction construction (as soon as could begin on first
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 City Wide Development Charges Background Study
    2019 City-Wide Development Charges Background Study Version for Public Consultation HEMSON C o n s u l t i n g L t d. March 15, 2019 Table of Contents List of Acronyms .......................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary ...................................................................................... 2 A. Purpose of 2019 Development Charges (DC) Background Study .. 2 B. City-Wide and Area-Specific DCs Have Been Calculated ............... 3 C. Development Forecast .................................................................... 4 D. Public Transit Ridership Forecast ................................................... 5 E. Calculated Development Charges .................................................. 5 F. Cost of Growth Analysis .................................................................. 6 G. Development Charges Administration & Policy Considerations ...... 7 I Purpose of 2019 Development Charges Background Study ............. 8 A. Introduction and Background .......................................................... 8 B. Legislative Context .......................................................................... 9 C. The 2019 DC Study is Intended to be an Interim Update ................ 9 D. Consultation And Approval Process ................................................ 9 E. Key Steps In Determining DCs for Future Development-Related Projects ......................................................................................... 10 F. Long-Term Capital
    [Show full text]
  • No. 48, Port Lands Flood Protection and Enabling Infrastructure, Page 54 Credit: Waterfront Toronto/Vid Ingelevics/Ryan Walker
    2021 No. 48, Port Lands Flood Protection and Enabling Infrastructure, Page 54 Credit: Waterfront Toronto/Vid Ingelevics/Ryan Walker Top100 Projects 2021 Changing the Language of Top100 Projects — 2021 An annual report inserted in Infrastructure ReNew Canada’s had an interesting encounter following the release of last January/February 2021 issue year’s report, and I wanted to share in an effort to get I feedback from the rest of the industry. MANAGING Andrew Macklin We had released the 2020 Top100 Projects report and were EDITOR [email protected] getting set for the Key Players and Owners Dinner, which we host every February in Toronto as a celebration of the accomplishments GROUP Todd Latham PUBLISHER of the industry in developing infrastructure megaprojects. I had heard through one of my colleagues that a couple of well-respected PUBLISHER Nick Krukowski members of the industry wanted to chat with me at the event and I should seek them out. So I did. ART DIRECTOR AND Donna Endacott SENIOR DESIGN My first thought was that, not having nearly the expertise as many of you, that I had somehow managed to royally screw something ASSOCIATE Simran Chattha up. Or perhaps they wanted to tell me that I should try a different EDITOR tact to the report? Maybe a new idea for adding a complementary DIGITAL MARKETING Becky Umweni piece for this report? But as it turned out, they wanted to have a COORDINATOR conversation with me about… language. DIGITAL The language of this report has become, to some, quite convoluted. Connie Vitello EDITOR As different jurisdictions use the language familiar to them, it can often mean that, from one project to the next, different words are EVENT Natasha Mawji MANAGER used to describe the same thing.
    [Show full text]
  • Ottawa Transportation Report.Pdf
    OTTAWA THE IMPACT OF TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS ON HOUSING VALUES IN THE OTTAWA REGION Don R Campbell, Senior Analyst Melanie Reuter, Director of Research Allyssa Epp, Research Analyst WWW.REINCANADA.COM AUTHORS Don R. Campbell, Senior Analyst, REIN Ltd Melanie Reuter, Director of Research, REIN Ltd Allyssa Fischer, Research Analyst, REIN Ltd © The Real Estate Investment Network Ltd. 6 – 27250 58 Cr Langley, BC V4W 3W7 Tel (604) 856-2825 Fax (604) 856-0091 E-Mail: [email protected] Web Page: www.reincanada.com Important Disclaimer: This Report, or any seminars or updates given in relation thereto, is sold, or otherwise provided, on the understanding that the authors – Don R. Campbell, Melanie Reuter, Allyssa Fischer, and The Real Estate Investment Network Ltd and their instructors, are not responsible for any results or results of any actions taken in reliance upon any information contained in this report, or conveyed by way of the said seminars, nor for any errors contained therein or presented thereat or omissions in relation thereto. It is further understood that the said authors and instructors do not purport to render legal, accounting, tax, investment, financial planning or other professional advice. The said authors and instructors hereby disclaim all and any liability to any person, whether a purchaser of this Report, a student of the said seminars, or otherwise, arising in respect of this Report, or the said seminars, and of the consequences of anything done or purported to be done by any such person in reliance, whether in whole or part, upon the whole or any part of the contents of this Report or the said seminars.
    [Show full text]
  • Vanier’S Changing Identity Through New Urban Infrastructure
    Recording Vanier’s Changing Identity Through New Urban Infrastructure by Hugo Béland-Latreille A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in SDUWLDOIXOÀOOPHQWRIWKHUHTXLUHPHQWVIRUWKHGHJUHHRI Master of Architecure Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario © 2015 Hugo Béland-Latreille Abstract This thesis explores questions of RI 9DQLHU 7KH VLWH LWVHOI GHVLJQDWHG E\ identity and the character of a place. the City of Ottawa as a “gateway” to the It will also deal with how this place QHLJKERXUKRRGGHDOVZLWKYDULRXVGHVLJQ maintains its individuality, or its genius challenges such as a connection to the ORFL GHÀQHG DV D VSHFLDO LUUHSODFHDEOH rest of the city, to the Rideau River, and quality that joins it to its greater context. a mediation of scale differences in the The intention is to create a vessel for the VXUURXQGLQJ XUEDQ IDEULF ,W DOVR GHDOV preservation of the existing identity of with sociopolitical challenges such as a place for its existing residents, while XUEDQLQWHQVLÀFDWLRQJHQWULÀFDWLRQDQG evolving to accommodate new residents. cultural identity. The design proposal 8UEDQVWUDWHJLHVDUHGLDJUDPPDWLFDOO\ DLPV WR VHW VWDQGDUGV IRU ZKDW ZLOO EH developed across greater Vanier, a DUJXHG DV ´UHVSRQVLEOH DUFKLWHFWXUHµ working-class, traditionally Francophone 7KHVHVWDQGDUGVDLPWRHVWDEOLVKSRVLWLYH QHLJKERXUKRRG WKH VSHFLÀF VLWH WR examples in the development of the EH GHYHORSHG DUFKLWHFWXUDOO\ IRU WKLV UDSLGO\ HYROYLQJ QHLJKERXUKRRG RI project is situated on the western edge Vanier. acknowledgements First of all, I want to thank my parents WKURXJKRXW WKH \HDUV EHFDPH D IULHQG who’ve always supported my education DQGPHQWRU<RXWUXO\EULQJRXWWKHEHVW DQG SXVKHG PH WR EHFRPH WKH FXULRXV in people, so thank you. SHUVRQ,DPWRGD\1RQHRIWKLVZRXOGEH SRVVLEOHZLWKRXWWKHVHWZRLQVSLUDWLRQDO ÀJXUHVLQP\OLIH I want to thank Izza, my girlfriend, for EHLQJ P\ PXVH )RU DOZD\V EHLQJ WKHUH for me in thick and thin, you were always KDSS\ WR KHOS DQG FRQWLQXH WR EH D ELJ part of my success.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 | Icsc Canadian Shopping Centre Awards | Finalists Ladies and Gentlemen… We Are Pleased to Unveil the Finalists of the 2015 Icsc Canadian Shopping Centre Awards!
    1 | ICSC CANADIAN SHOPPING CENTRE AWARDS | FINALISTS LADIES AND GENTLEMEN… WE ARE PLEASED TO UNVEIL THE FINALISTS OF THE 2015 ICSC CANADIAN SHOPPING CENTRE AWARDS! Your creativity and remarkable feats of excellence have dazzled our judges. We invite you to step into the spotlight as we announce the winners! Let’s celebrate the innovative, dynamic and ever-evolving nature that is the “Retail Circus”, at the ICSC CANADIAN SHOPPING CENTRE AWARDS GALA OCTOBER 7TH, TORONTO, ONTARIO TORONTO CONVENTION CENTRE For more information visit: www.icsc.org/canadianawards CONGRATULATIONS AND SEE YOU UNDER THE BIG TOP! 2015 ICSC Canadian Shopping Centre Awards Committee 2 | ICSC CANADIAN SHOPPING CENTRE AWARDS | FINALISTS 3 | ICSC CANADIAN SHOPPING CENTRE AWARDS | FINALISTS ADVERTISING CENTRES 400,000 TO 750,000 SQ. FT. CENTRES MORE THAN 1,000,000 SQ. OF TOTAL RETAIL SPACE FT. OF TOTAL RETAIL SPACE A REBOOTED BOWER PLACE YOURS GTC Bower Place Guildford Town Centre Red Deer, Alberta Surrey, British Columbia @CENTRALCITY A RETAIL WIN AT DIX30! Central City Shopping Centre Quartier DIX30 Surrey, British Columbia Brossard, Quebec ORCHARD PARK STYLE INSPIRERS Orchard Park Kelowna, British Columbia MY NEW WARDROBE Place Ste-Foy Québec, Québec #CELEBRATEYOU Uptown Victoria, British Columbia 1 | ICSC CANADIAN SHOPPING CENTRE AWARDS | FINALISTS BUSINESS-TO-BUSINESS CENTRES MORE THAN 1,000,000 SQ. FT. OF TOTAL RETAIL SPACE PANDORA PARTNERSHIP Bramalea City Centre Brampton, Ontario YORKDALE’S RETAILER ONBOARDING STRATEGY Yorkdale Shopping Centre Toronto, Ontario 2 | ICSC CANADIAN SHOPPING CENTRE AWARDS | FINALISTS CAUSE RELATED MARKETING CENTRES OF 150,000 SQ. FT. OR CENTRES 400,000 TO 750,000 SQ.
    [Show full text]