DOCSLIB.ORG

US 101 Elwha River Bridge Environmental Assessment With

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
US 101 Elwha River Bridge Environmental Assessment With US 101 Elwha River Bridge Replacement Environmental Assessment Washington State Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration – Washington Division June 30, 2021 Title VI Notice to Public It is the Washington State Department of Transportation’s (WSDOT) policy to assure that no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin or sex, as provided by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise discriminated against under any of its programs and activities. Any person who believes his/her Title VI protection has been violated, may file a complaint with WSDOT’s Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO). For additional information regarding Title VI complaint procedures and/or information regarding our non-discrimination obligations, please contact OEO’s Title VI Coordinator at (360) 705-7090. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Information This material can be made available in an alternate format by emailing the Office of Equal Opportunity at [email protected] or by calling toll free, 855-362-4ADA (4232). Persons who are deaf or hard of hearing may make a request by calling the Washington State Relay at 711. US 101 Elwha River Bridge Replacement –Environmental Assessment ii US 101 Elwha River Bridge Replacement –Environmental Assessment iii Table of Contents Chapter 1: Background and Purpose and Need ............................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Need and Purpose ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.2.1 Need ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2.2 Purpose ........................................................................................................................................ 2 1.2.3 Cooperating Agencies and the Decision-Making Process ............................................................ 2 Chapter 2: Alternatives ................................................................................................................................. 4 2.1 No Build Alternative ............................................................................................................................ 4 2.2 Build Alternative ................................................................................................................................. 4 2.3 Alternatives Considered but Dismissed ............................................................................................ 10 2.3.1 New Bridge on Existing Alignment ............................................................................................. 10 2.3.2 Replace U.S. Highway 101 with State Routes 112 and 113 ....................................................... 10 2.3.3 Develop Alternate Highway West of State Road 112 Bridge ..................................................... 11 2.3.4 Retrofit Existing Bridge .............................................................................................................. 11 2.3.5 New Bridge on Parallel Alignment ............................................................................................. 12 Chapter 3: Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences ....................................................... 13 3.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 13 3.2 Methodology ..................................................................................................................................... 13 3.3 Cumulative Impact Scenario ............................................................................................................. 15 3.4 Affected Environment and Impact Analysis ...................................................................................... 18 3.4.1 Geology and Soils ....................................................................................................................... 18 3.4.2 Vegetation .................................................................................................................................. 21 3.4.3 Water Resources ........................................................................................................................ 24 3.4.4 Wetlands .................................................................................................................................... 29 3.4.5 Fish ............................................................................................................................................. 32 3.4.6 Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat ...................................................................................................... 36 3.4.7 Threatened and Endangered Species ........................................................................................ 39 3.4.8 Cultural Resources ..................................................................................................................... 48 3.4.9 Acoustic Environment ................................................................................................................ 51 3.4.10 Social and Environmental Justice ............................................................................................. 58 3.4.11 Transportation ......................................................................................................................... 62 3.4.12 Land Use ................................................................................................................................... 65 US 101 Elwha River Bridge Replacement –Environmental Assessment iv 3.4.13 Public Access ............................................................................................................................ 68 3.4.14 Visual Quality ........................................................................................................................... 72 3.4.15 Section 4(f) of the U.S. Department of Transportation Act of 1966 ........................................ 80 3.4.16 Hazardous Materials ................................................................................................................ 81 3.4.17 Climate Change ........................................................................................................................ 82 3.3.18 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...................................................................................................... 83 Chapter 4: Consultation and Coordination ................................................................................................. 86 4.1 Public and Agency Outreach ............................................................................................................. 86 Chapter 5: References ................................................................................................................................. 90 Appendix A Elwha Act Legislation ..................................................................................................... 93 Appendix B Discipline Studies/Memos and List of Preparers ......................................................... 100 Appendix C EA Distribution List ....................................................................................................... 101 Appendix E Agency and Tribal Correspondence ............................................................................. 106 Appendix F Bridge Design and Cross-sections ................................................................................ 107 Appendix G Draft Section 4(f) Evaluation and Section 106 Memorandum of Agreement .............. 108 US 101 Elwha River Bridge Replacement –Environmental Assessment v Tables Table 1. ESA-Listed Species and Critical Habitat……………………………...............40 Table 2. Effect determinations for Species and Designated Critical Habitat…………...47 Table 3. Predicted Noise Levels (LAeq)……………………...………………………...57 Table 4. Minority and Elderly Populations…………………………...………………...59 Table 5. Dry Creek Elementary School Demographic Data……………...……….……60 Figures Figure 1. Vicinity Map……………………………………………………………………3 Figure 2. Project Area Overview…………………………………………………………5 Figure 3. Construction Access……………………………………………………………7 Figure 4. Demolition Access……………………………………………………………..8 Figure 5. Wetland Location Map………………………………………………………..30 Figure 6. Conceptual Engineered Log Jam Placement………………………………….35 Figure 7. The Project Area of Potential Effect (APE)…………………………………..49 Figure 8. Project Map with Proposed Informal Parking Area…………………………..70 Figure 9. GHG Emissions by Sector, Washington State (2012) and National (2013)….84 US 101 Elwha River Bridge Replacement –Environmental Assessment vi Acronyms APE Area of Potential Effect BMP Best Management Practice CEQ Council on Environmental Quality DAHP Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation dbh Diameter at breast height DOI Department of the Interior EA Environmental Assessment EFH Essential Fish Habitat ESA Endangered Species Act FHWA Federal Highway Administration FONSI Finding of No Significant Impact HED Highway Easement Deed LEKT Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe NEPA National Environmental Policy
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Final Environmental Impact Statement
    Final Environmental Impact Statement Elwha River Ecosystem Restoration Implementation Purpose and Need: The Elwha River ecosystem and native anadromous fisheries are severely degraded as a result of two hydroelectric dams (projects) and their reservoirs built in the early 1900s. Congress has mandated the full restoration of this ecosystem and its native anadromous fisheries through the Elwha River Ecosystem and Fisheries Restoration Act (Public Law 102-495). The Department of the Interior has found there is a need to return this river and the ecosystem to its natural, self-regulating state, and proposes to implement the Congressional mandate by removing both dams in a safe, environmentally sound and cost effective manner and implementing fisheries and ecosystem restoration planning. Only dam removal would fully restore the ecosystem or its native anadromous fisheries. Proposed Action: The U.S. Department of the Interior proposes to fully restore the Elwha River ecosystem and native anadromous fisheries through the removal of Elwha Dam and Glines Canyon Dam and implementing fish restoration and revegetation. Dam removal would occur over a 2-year period. Elwha Dam would be removed by blasting, and Glines Canyon Dam by a combination of blasting and diamond wire saw cutting. Lake Aldwell would be drained by a diversion channel, and Lake Mills by notching down Glines Canyon Dam. Stored sediment would be eroded naturally by the Elwha River. The proposed action is located in Clallam County, on the Olympic Peninsula, in Washington State. Lead/Cooperating agencies: The National Park Service is the lead agency. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Shoreline Master Program.Doc
    CLALLAM COUNTY SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Prepared by The CLALLAM COUNTY SHORELINE ADVISORY COMMITTEE With Assistance from the CLALLAM COUNTY DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION ADOPTED: By Clallam County Board of Commissioners: June 30, 1976 By Washington State Department of Ecology: August 5, 1976 REVISED: By Washington State Department of Ecology: November 16, 1976 August 10, 1979 January 4, 1983 March 27, 1984 January 27, 1986 June 3, 1986 March 1, 1988 October 31, 1989 June 16, 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Title Page 1 Preamble and Purpose 1 2 Goals and General Policies 2 3 Environments and Use-Element Policies 3 4 Natural Systems Regulations 12 4.01 Marine Beaches 13 4.02 Spits and Bars 15 4.03 Dunes 16 4.04 Islands 17 4.05 Estuaries 18 4.06 Reefs 19 4.07 Bays, Coves, and Headlands 20 4.08 Marshes, Bogs, and Swamps 22 4.09 Lakes 24 4.10 Rivers, Streams, and Creeks 26 4.11 Flood Plains 28 4.12 Subtidal Shorelines 30 4.13 Shoreline Cliffs 31 5 Use Activity Regulations 33 5.01 Agricultural Practices 34 5.02 Aquaculture 35 5.03 Forest Management Practices 39 5.04 Commercial Development 41 5.05 Marinas and Boat Launching Facilities 43 5.06 Mining 45 5.07 Outdoor Advertising (Signs and Billboards) 47 5.08 Residential Development 49 5.09 Utilities 53 5.10 Ports and Water-Related Industries 54 5.11 Bulkheads 56 5.12 Breakwaters 58 5.13 Jetties and Groins 60 5.14 Landfill and Solid Waste Disposal 62 5.15 Dredging 64 5.16 Shoreline Protection 66 5.17 Roads and Railroad Design and Construction 68 5.18 Piers, Docks, Floats, Mooring
    [Show full text]
  • Bicycling the O Lympic Peninsula
    Eastern Clallam County Bicycle Map Be Visible • Be Alert • Wear a Helmet • Have Fun RCW 46.61.755 states: Signal before turns and lane Be visible day or night. Be courteous. Choose the best way to turn left: Ride defensively. Be aware of other Ride predictably. changes. Wear bright clothes. Traffic laws apply to persons ❚ LIKE a CAR—scan behind, yield, signal vehicles. Leave adequate space between you and riding bicycles. Audibly alert pedestrians as Check behind and ahead before RCW 46.61.780 states: you approach. and when safe, move into the left lane Do not pass on the right. parked cars. and turn left. Obey all traffic signs, signals and turning. At night you must have a Be careful of opening car doors. laws. Ride in the same direction white headlight and taillight Yield to pedestrians in the ❚ LIKE a PEDESTRIAN—dismount and CAUTION: Always watch for cars as traffic. Yield to vehicles with the or red rear reflector. crosswalk. walk your bike across the intersection stopping or turning. Do not weave in and out of parked cars right-of-way. in the crosswalk. and traffic. Twin Salt Creek County Park Crescent Bay Strait of Juan de Fuca Agate Bay d R r e Lyre River Pvt. Beach To iv gate R n d Clallam Bay i R w r T e d Pvt. t iv s R and Sekiu R Field Creek Lower Elwha Klallam e re r y e Crescent School W L . v i Striped Indian Reservation W R (Parking in South Whiskey Creek e r Peak End of Bus Route y end of lot beside gate L Salt Creek .
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Survey Report for Lake Mills and Lake Aldwell on the Elwha River, Washington
    Technical Report No. SRH-2010-23 2010 Survey Report for Lake Mills and Lake Aldwell on the Elwha River, Washington Lake Mills photograph courtesy of Tom Rooda at Northwest Territories Inc. U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Technical Service Center Denver, Colorado April 2011 – Amended June 2011 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Technical Service Center Denver, Colorado 2010 Survey Report and Area-Capacity Tables for Lake Mills and Lake Aldwell on the Elwha River, Washington Report Prepared by: Jennifer Bountry, P.E., M.S., Hydraulic Engineer Sedimentation and River Hydraulics Group, Technical Service Center Ron Ferrari, Hydraulic Engineer Sedimentation and River Hydraulics Group, Technical Service Center Kurt Wille, Physical Scientist Sedimentation and River Hydraulics Group, Technical Service Center Tim J. Randle, P.E., M.S., D.WRE., Hydraulic Engineer and Manager Sedimentation and River Hydraulics Group, Technical Service Center Peer Review Certification: This document has been peer reviewed per guidelines established by the Technical Service Center and is believed to be in accordance with the service agreement and standards of the profession. REPORT PREPARED B DATE Jni^fef BounxE., M.S. P}\'(sical Scientist Sedimentation and River y raulics Group (8 6-6 8240) DATE: Hydraulic Eng Sedimentation and River Hydraulics Group (86-68240) DATE: )-I7- I) Kurt Wille Physical Scientist Sedimentation and River Hydraulics Group (86-68240) DATE:?- 26- 2/( Tim J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Elwha River Ecosystem Restoration Project: a Case Study of Government-To-Government Co-Management
    The Elwha River Ecosystem Restoration Project: A Case Study of Government-to-Government Co-Management Haley L. Harguth A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Marine Affairs University of Washington 2013 Committee: David Fluharty Craig Thomas Program Authorized to Offer Degree: School of Marine & Environmental Affairs ©Copyright 2013 Haley L. Harguth University of Washington Abstract Evaluating Co-Management at the Elwha River Ecosystem Restoration Project Haley L. Harguth Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor David Fluharty School of Marine & Environmental Affairs The contribution of indigenous groups in natural resource management is generally believed to enhance management practices and produce positive outcomes for its participants, by improving stewardship and encouraging power-sharing arrangements, among other outcomes. For federally recognized Native American communities, government-to-government co-management relationships with the U.S. federal government have provided opportunities to modernize the treaty trust relationship, and enrich linkages between environmental ethics and cultural heritage, building tribal capacity and autonomy. The case of the Elwha River dam removal and ecosystem restoration on the Olympic Peninsula in Washington State presents an opportunity to demonstrate the progress made in consultation practices and co-management efforts on the behalf of the U.S. government, in the execution of the largest dam removal project ever attempted. For the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, river restoration will re-connect the Tribe to the legendary salmon runs that are its cultural livelihood. The co-management relationship established between the project’s two lead actors, the National Park Service and the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, has demonstrated the positive outcomes of a mutually respected process facilitated through power-sharing, as well as the dilemma for tribal decision-makers in maintaining cultural tradition and engaging in environmental management under congressional mandates.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerial Missions with Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems to Monitor Sediment Flow and Changing Topography Resulting from the Removal of Dams on the Elwha River
    Technical Memorandum 86-68260-13-03 Aerial Missions with Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems to Monitor Sediment Flow and Changing Topography Resulting from the Removal of Dams on the Elwha River Elwha River Restoration, Washington Pacific Northwest Region U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation September 2013 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY National Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Project Office BUREAU OF RECLAMATION Technical Service Center, Denver, Colorado Emergency Management and GIS Group, 86068260 Technical Memorandum No. 86-68260-13-03 Aerial Missions with Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems to Monitor Sediment Flow and Changing Topography Resulting from the Removal of Dams on the Elwha River Elwha Dam Olympic National Park (Washington) Douglas Clark, Ph.D. 12 November 2013 Preparer Date Physical Scientist, USBR, Emergency Management and GIS Group, 86-68260 Alan Bell 12 November 2013 Preparer Date Physical Scientist, USBR, Emergency Management and GIS Group, 86-68260 Jeff Sloan 12 November 2013 Preparer: (type in name) Date Cartographer, USGS, National UAS Project Office, MS-980 Mark Bauer 12 November 2013 Preparer: (type in name) Date Geospatial Analyst, Parallel Inc. USGS National UAS Project Office, MS-980 Susan Goplen 12 November 2013 Preparer: (type in name) Date IT Specialist, USGS, National UAS Project Office, MS-980 Elwha UAS Study Bruce K.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidebook to Invasive Nonnative Plants of the Elwha Watershed Restoration
    Guidebook to Invasive Nonnative Plants of the Elwha Watershed Restoration Olympic National Park, Washington Cynthia Lee Riskin A project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Environmental Horticulture University of Washington 2013 Committee: Linda Chalker-Scott Kern Ewing Sarah Reichard Joshua Chenoweth Program Authorized to Offer Degree: School of Environmental and Forest Sciences Guidebook to Invasive Nonnative Plants of the Elwha Watershed Restoration Olympic National Park, Washington Cynthia Lee Riskin Master of Environmental Horticulture candidate School of Environmental and Forest Sciences University of Washington, Seattle September 3, 2013 Contents Figures ................................................................................................................................................................. ii Tables ................................................................................................................................................................. vi Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... vii Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Bromus tectorum L. (BROTEC) ..................................................................................................................... 19 Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. (CIRARV)
    [Show full text]
  • Large-Scale Dam Removal on the Elwha River, Washington, USA: Source-To-Sink Sediment Budget and Synthesis
    Geomorphology 246 (2015) 729–750 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Geomorphology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/geomorph Large-scale dam removal on the Elwha River, Washington, USA: Source-to-sink sediment budget and synthesis Jonathan A. Warrick a,⁎, Jennifer A. Bountry b, Amy E. East a, Christopher S. Magirl c, Timothy J. Randle b, Guy Gelfenbaum a, Andrew C. Ritchie d,GeorgeR.Pesse, Vivian Leung f, Jeffrey J. Duda g a U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center, Santa Cruz, CA, USA b Bureau of Reclamation, Sedimentation and River Hydraulics Group, Denver, CO, USA c U.S. Geological Survey, Washington Water Science Center, Tacoma, WA, USA d National Park Service, Olympic National Park, Port Angeles, WA, USA e National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, Seattle, WA, USA f University of Washington, Department of Earth & Space Sciences, Seattle, WA, USA g U.S. Geological Survey, Western Fisheries Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA article info abstract Article history: Understanding landscape responses to sediment supply changes constitutes a fundamental part of many problems Received 7 August 2014 in geomorphology, but opportunities to study such processes at field scales are rare. The phased removal of two large Received in revised form 13 January 2015 dams on the Elwha River, Washington, exposed 21 ± 3 million m3, or ~30 million tonnes (t), of sediment that had Accepted 15 January 2015 been deposited in the two former reservoirs, allowing a comprehensive investigation
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Dam Decommissioning Projects
    United States Society on Dams Guidelines for Dam Decommissioning Projects July 2015 Prepared by the USSD Committee on Dam Decommissioning U.S. Society on Dams Vision A world class organization dedicated to advancing the role of dam and levee systems and building the community of practice. Mission USSD, as the United States member of the International Commission on Large Dams, is dedicated to: ADVOCATE: Champion the role of dam and levee systems in society. EDUCATE: Be the premier source for technical information about dam and levee systems. COLLABORATE: Build networks and relationships to strengthen the community of practice. CULTIVATE: Nurture the growth of the community of practice. The information contained in this report regarding commercial products or firms may not be used for advertising or promotional purposes and may not be construed as an endorsement of any product or firm by the United States Society on Dams. USSD accepts no responsibility for the statements made or the opinions expressed in this publication. Copyright © 2015 U. S. Society on Dams Printed in the United States of America ISBN 978-1-884575-71-6 U.S. Society on Dams 1616 Seventeenth Street, #483 Denver, CO 80202 Telephone: 303-628-5430 Fax: 303-628-5431 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.ussdams.org FOREWORD The primary objective of these Guidelines for Dam Decommissioning Projects is to provide dam owners, dam engineers, and other professionals with the information necessary to help guide decision-making when considering dam removal as a project alternative. If selected as the preferred alternative, these Guidelines may help in the development and execution of a successful dam decommissioning project, which would include all necessary activities associated with the removal of a dam and restoration of the river, from project planning through design and implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • Elwha River's Return to Nature
    Dam Removal Elwha River’s Return to Nature Bill Jones he removal of two dams from the Elwha River on the Olympic TPeninsula between 2011 and 2014 were the largest dam removals in the world at the time. A project of this magnitude and importance should be included in this issue of LakeLine with its theme of “Dam Removal.” Unfortunately, we could find no one in multiple federal or state agencies, or in universities willing and able to write this article. Therefore, I have prepared the following based upon previously published materials. Setting The Elwha River is located in the northern half of Washington’s Olympic Peninsula (Figure 1). It is only 45 miles long, from its source high in the Olympic Mountains to its mouth on the Strait of Juan de Fuca, but includes over 100 miles of tributaries. The river flows south to north through old growth forests sustained by 60 to 80 inches of rain per year. About 83 percent of the watershed lies within Olympic National Park (Sadin et al. 2011). The river historically supported a rich and diverse anadromous (fish that spawn in freshwater but live in saltwater) salmonid population. Prior to hydropower development, the Elwha was one of the few rivers in the lower U.S. that supported all the anadromous salmonids native to the Pacific Northwest: spring and summer-fall run Chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), coho (O. kisutch), chum (O. keta), pink (O. gorbuscha), and sockeye (O. nerka) salmon; summer- and winter-run steelhead (O. mykiss); sea-run cutthroat trout (O. clarkii), Dolly Varden Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Kit 2015 Table of Contents
    MEDIA KIT 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Fact Sheet Olympic National Park at a Glance Lake Crescent Lodge Lake Quinault Lodge Lake Quinault Lodge Tours Sol Duc Hot Springs Resort Log Cabin Resort Activities Weddings and Special Events Media Resources About Aramark Parks and Destinations FACT SHEET ADDRESS Lake Crescent Lodge Sol Duc Hot Springs Resort 416 Lake Crescent Road 12076 Sol Duc Hot Springs Road Olympic National Park, WA 98363 Port Angeles, WA 98363 Reservations: 866-297-7367 Reservations: 866-297-7367 Lake Quinault Lodge Log Cabin Resort 345 South Shore Road 3183 East Beach Road Quinault, WA 98575 Port Angeles, WA 98363 Reservations: 866-297-7367 Reservations: 866-297-7367 WEBSITE www.olympicnationalparks.com www.facebook.com/olympicnationalpark LOCATION Olympic National Park is located on Washington’s Olympic Peninsula, which lies west of Seattle and due south of Victoria, Canada. The park includes three distinct ecosystems: coastal, rainforest and sub-alpine with amazing vistas such as glacier-covered mountains, sea stacks and mountain lakes. The park’s nearly million acres are mostly contained within Highway 101, which forms a loop around the peninsula. SEASON Olympic National Park is open year round and each season brings with it a special flair—from snow and storm watching in winter, to hiking and kayaking in summer. Lake Quinault Lodge is open year-round, while Lake Crescent Lodge, Sol Duc Hot Springs Resort and Log Cabin Resort on the north end of the park close for winter. VICTORIA B.C. PORT ANGELES LAKE SEQUIM CRESCENT LODGE PORT TOWNSEND LOG CABIN RESORT FORKS SOL DUC HOT SPRINGS HURRICANE RIDGE Olympic National Park BREMERTON SEATTLE LAKE QUINAULT LODGE Olympic National Forest TACOMA ABERDEEN OLYMPIA TO PORTLAND FACT SHEET HISTORY OF THIS LAND The history of Olympic National Park is as rich as the land and the water within it.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.4 Elwha River and Tributaries Page 2.4-1
    Chapter 2.4 Elwha River and Tributaries Page 2.4-1 2.4 ELWHA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES 2.4.1 Overview The Elwha River is the largest watershed in the EMMT area and it constitutes the westernmost watershed within the planning area (Figure 2.4-1). The Elwha mainstem is approximately 45 miles long, has 100 miles of tributary streams, has a basin averaging approximately ten miles wide in an east-west direction, and drains 321 square miles of the Olympic Peninsula. Eighty-three percent of the drainage, including the upper 35 miles of the mainstem, lies within Olympic National Park, and is therefore protected from timber harvest, agriculture, and other land-use disturbances. The river flows in a northerly direction into the Strait of Juan de Fuca, entering the strait five miles west of Port Angeles. The Elwha is the fourth largest river, by drainage area, among all Olympic Peninsula streams, with a watershed area smaller only than those of the Quillayute, Queets, and Quinault rivers. Two major hydroelectric developments have altered the historic condition of the Elwha River. The Elwha Dam, built at RM 4.9 beginning in 1910, now impounds the 2.5-mile long Lake Aldwell reservoir, and the Glines Canyon Dam, built at RM 13.4, now impounds the 2.8-mile long Lake Mills reservoir. Originally built and operated to produce electricity for Port Angeles and beyond (supplying power as far away as Bremerton and Port Townsend prior to 1921), the dams have been fully allocated to supplying power to the pulp mill now operated by Nippon Paper Industries USA since the early 1920s.
    [Show full text]