DOCSLIB.ORG

Facies Architecture in a Multidam System, Elwha River, Washington Autopsy of a Reservoir: Facies Architecture in a Multidam System, Elwha River, Washington, USA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Facies Architecture in a Multidam System, Elwha River, Washington Autopsy of a Reservoir: Facies Architecture in a Multidam System, Elwha River, Washington, USA Facies architecture in a multidam system, Elwha River, Washington Autopsy of a reservoir: Facies architecture in a multidam system, Elwha River, Washington, USA Laurel E. Stratton1,† and Gordon E. Grant2 1College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, 104 CEOAS Admin Building, 101 SW 26th Street, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, USA 2U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, 3200 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, USA ABSTRACT the 1927 closure of Glines Canyon Dam up- critically, the sediment dynamics of multiple stream caused the delta to evolve to a fine- reservoirs arranged longitudinally in a single The 2011–2014 removal of two large dams grained, mouth-bar–type delta indicative of river or watershed remain largely unexplored. on the Elwha River, Washington State, the low, finer-grained sediment. This evolution, As a result, our understanding of the character largest dam removal yet completed globally, combined with a previously unrecognized of sedimentation in individual reservoirs and created extensive cutbank exposures of reser- landslide deposit into the upper delta plain, the processes controlling them, as well as the voir sediments, allowing the first character- suggests that understanding the exogenic in- response to changing sediment regimes in mul- ization of the facies architecture of sediments fluences on reservoir sedimentation is critical tidam systems, is limited. through direct observation in reservoirs to interpretation and prediction of the sedi- At the scale of individual dams, most study worldwide and providing an unparalleled op- mentation within individual systems. has focused on developing approaches to aid portunity to assess the relationship between managers in determining the local sediment environmental influences, such as changes in INTRODUCTION yield or volumetric accumulation rate. In its sediment supply, and their expression in the comprehensive design manual Small Dams stratigraphic record. Using a combination As of 2018, there were an estimated 59,000 (a legacy title retained through multiple edi- of facies description from observation of 49 large (>15-m-high) dams worldwide, intercept- tions despite its expanded applicability to large measured sections and >100 exposures and ing 40% of total river flow volume annually, dam design), the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation analysis of digital elevation models and his- impounding an area as large as 723,000 km2, (USBR) developed a series of morphology- toric aerial photographs, we delineated the and increasing the terrestrial water surface area and operations-based type curves to plot the characteristic depositional zones of each res- by >7% (Nilsson et al., 2005; Downing et al., relationship between reservoir depth and depo- ervoir and mapped the evolution of the sub- 2006; Lehner et al., 2011; International Com- sition. These curves recognize that sedimenta- aerial delta over the life span of the reservoir. mission on Dams, 2018). These dams represent tion is typically weighted toward the upstream, Former Lake Mills, the younger, upstream humans’ greatest impact on global land-ocean inflow-adjacent regions of reservoirs, with the reservoir, was characterized by a tripartite, sediment transport, with as much as 25% of assumed delta volume equal to the volume of subaerial Gilbert-style delta that prograded annual global sediment discharge impounded sand-sized or greater sediment input to the >1 km into the main reservoir from 1927 to (Vörösmarty et al., 2003). In fact, despite reservoir (Strand and Pemberton, 1987). The 2011. Sediments were composed of coarse- an estimated 2300 Tg yr–1 increase in global USBR considers a “typical” delta profile to be grained topset beds, steeply dipping fore- sediment transport during the Anthropocene, defined by distinct topset and foreset slopes set beds, and a fine-grained, gently dipping ~1400 Tg yr–1 less sediment reaches the world’s separated by a pivot point located at the median prodelta. While individual event horizons oceans (Syvitski et al., 2005). reservoir operating elevation, but notes that “the were discernible in fine-grained sediments of The resulting disconnectivity in river sys- prediction of delta formation is still an empirical former Lake Mills, their number and spac- tems and the global transfer of sediment via procedure based upon observed delta deposits in ing did not correspond to known drawdown the “sediment cascade” has been the subject of existing reservoirs” (p. 549) and requires exten- or flood events. Former Lake Aldwell, im- much study. However, most work has focused sive data collection. pounded from 1913 to 2011, was initially de- on estimating the net sediment volume impact The “typical” profile, as defined by the fined by the rapid progradation of a Gilbert- at the local, basin, or global scale (cf. Wall- USBR, represents a Gilbert-style delta, first style, subaerial delta prior to the upstream ing and Fang, 2003; Vörösmarty et al., 2003; described in the deposits of Pleistocene Lake completion of Glines Canyon Dam. However, Syvitski et al., 2005; Kummu et al., 2010; Yang Bonneville (Gilbert, 1885). The Gilbert delta and Lu, 2014) and resulting downstream effects, is a process-based paradigm, in which the de- both geomorphic and ecologic, of damming crease in slope and rapid expansion of flow †U.S. Geological Survey Oregon Water Science river systems (e.g., Nilsson and Berggren, 2000; abruptly decrease the competence of inflowing Center, 2130 SW 5th Avenue, Portland, Oregon Bunn and Arthington, 2002; Graf, 2005). The discharge, causing rapid, inertia-based sedimen- 97201, USA; [email protected]. dynamics of in-reservoir sedimentation and, tation (Nemec, 1990a, 1990b). Accordingly, GSA Bulletin; Month/Month 2019; v. 131; no. X/X; p. 000–000; https://doi.org/10.1130/B31959.1; 16 figures; 2 tables; Data Repository item 2018204. For permission to copy, contact [email protected] Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 1XX, no. XX/XX 1 © 2019 Geological Society of America Downloaded from https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/doi/10.1130/B31959.1/4672851/b31959.pdf by Oregon State University user on 17 September 2019 Stratton and Grant incoming sediment is deposited as a prograding of sedimentation studies addressing cascaded styles of deltaic progradation over the course foreset wedge, defined by a gravelly, subaerial reservoirs can be found. of the reservoirs’ lifetimes. We then used these topset bed, heterolithic foreset slope prograding observations to broadly interpret how reservoir at about the angle of repose, and downstream- Approach and Scope cascades with multiple impoundments can con- fining bottomset wedge. The Gilbert paradigm trol depositional styles and rates and to assess has informed a vast literature of delta dynam- The poorly understood dynamics of sedi- the expression of known environmental events ics and remains the dominant model in lacus- ment deposition in reservoirs may be attributed (e.g., an 18 m reservoir drawdown in 1989 or a trine delta interpretation (e.g., Colella and Prior, in part to an absence of rigorous description 50 yr flood in 2007) in the stratigraphic record. 1990; Talbot and Allen, 1996; Reading and Col- and observation across a range of reservoir sys- linson, 1996; Wetzel, 2001; Snyder et al., 2006). tems. Unlike natural lakes, which are well rep- STUDY AREA Examples of Gilbert-style reservoir deltas resented within the geologic record, the archi- have been documented in Trinity and Eng- tecture of reservoir sediments has thus far been Elwha River Hydrology and lebright Lakes, two reservoirs in northern Cali- relatively inaccessible to detailed study except Geomorphology fornia (Spicer and Wolfe, 1987; Snyder et al., through coring and remote-sensing techniques. 2004, 2006). However, results from other stud- The accelerating pace of dam removals in the The Elwha River watershed (833 km2) is lo- ies of reservoir sedimentation suggest that the late twentieth century and early twenty-first cated on the northern Olympic Peninsula, Wash- Gilbert paradigm is oversimplified or not appli- century, however, has provided an unparalleled ington (Fig. 1). Watershed elevation ranges from cable to many reservoirs. For example, studies opportunity to examine reservoir sedimentation 2432 m in the glaciated core of the Olympic in Lake Mead, located on the Colorado River within a watershed context (O’Connor et al., Mountains to sea level, where the Elwha River and the largest reservoir in the United States, 2015; Major et al., 2017; Foley et al., 2017). discharges to the Strait of Juan de Fuca. Most show that turbidity currents appear to be the With the advent of intentional dam removal, we precipitation occurs from October to March, primary mechanism of sediment transport to the now have a brief window within which to ex- with snow dominating above ~1200 m. Pre- stagnant-basin portions of the reservoir, modify- amine the way in which sediment accumulates cipitation is strongly controlled by elevation and ing the shape and distribution of the delta front in reservoirs before the deposit is eroded by a ranges from more than 6000 mm yr–1 on Mount and transporting relatively coarse-grained sedi- free-flowing river. From this, many questions Olympus to only 1000 mm yr–1 at the mouth ments as far as the dam, >100 km downstream become more approachable, including how of the Elwha River; climate records (1948– (Kostic et al., 2002; Twichell et al., 2005; Wild- multiple reservoirs interact to affect sediment 2005) from the Elwha Ranger Station average man et al., 2011). Additionally, research sug- deposition and what this implies for calculating 1430 mm yr–1 (Duda et al., 2011). gests that reservoirs operated for flood control, reservoir accumulation rates, trap efficiencies, The Elwha River is 72 km long, with eight which are seasonally drawn down to create and lifetimes. tributaries greater than third order and a total floodwater accommodation space, show pat- The 2011–2014 demolition of Elwha and tributary length of ~161 km (Duda et al., 2008; terns of sedimentation that are strongly influ- Glines Canyon Dams on the Elwha River, Clal- Bromley, 2008).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • US 101 Elwha River Bridge Environmental Assessment With
    US 101 Elwha River Bridge Replacement Environmental Assessment Washington State Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration – Washington Division June 30, 2021 Title VI Notice to Public It is the Washington State Department of Transportation’s (WSDOT) policy to assure that no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin or sex, as provided by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise discriminated against under any of its programs and activities. Any person who believes his/her Title VI protection has been violated, may file a complaint with WSDOT’s Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO). For additional information regarding Title VI complaint procedures and/or information regarding our non-discrimination obligations, please contact OEO’s Title VI Coordinator at (360) 705-7090. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Information This material can be made available in an alternate format by emailing the Office of Equal Opportunity at [email protected] or by calling toll free, 855-362-4ADA (4232). Persons who are deaf or hard of hearing may make a request by calling the Washington State Relay at 711. US 101 Elwha River Bridge Replacement –Environmental Assessment ii US 101 Elwha River Bridge Replacement –Environmental Assessment iii Table of Contents Chapter 1: Background and Purpose and Need ............................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Impact Statement
    Final Environmental Impact Statement Elwha River Ecosystem Restoration Implementation Purpose and Need: The Elwha River ecosystem and native anadromous fisheries are severely degraded as a result of two hydroelectric dams (projects) and their reservoirs built in the early 1900s. Congress has mandated the full restoration of this ecosystem and its native anadromous fisheries through the Elwha River Ecosystem and Fisheries Restoration Act (Public Law 102-495). The Department of the Interior has found there is a need to return this river and the ecosystem to its natural, self-regulating state, and proposes to implement the Congressional mandate by removing both dams in a safe, environmentally sound and cost effective manner and implementing fisheries and ecosystem restoration planning. Only dam removal would fully restore the ecosystem or its native anadromous fisheries. Proposed Action: The U.S. Department of the Interior proposes to fully restore the Elwha River ecosystem and native anadromous fisheries through the removal of Elwha Dam and Glines Canyon Dam and implementing fish restoration and revegetation. Dam removal would occur over a 2-year period. Elwha Dam would be removed by blasting, and Glines Canyon Dam by a combination of blasting and diamond wire saw cutting. Lake Aldwell would be drained by a diversion channel, and Lake Mills by notching down Glines Canyon Dam. Stored sediment would be eroded naturally by the Elwha River. The proposed action is located in Clallam County, on the Olympic Peninsula, in Washington State. Lead/Cooperating agencies: The National Park Service is the lead agency. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Shoreline Master Program.Doc
    CLALLAM COUNTY SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Prepared by The CLALLAM COUNTY SHORELINE ADVISORY COMMITTEE With Assistance from the CLALLAM COUNTY DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION ADOPTED: By Clallam County Board of Commissioners: June 30, 1976 By Washington State Department of Ecology: August 5, 1976 REVISED: By Washington State Department of Ecology: November 16, 1976 August 10, 1979 January 4, 1983 March 27, 1984 January 27, 1986 June 3, 1986 March 1, 1988 October 31, 1989 June 16, 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Title Page 1 Preamble and Purpose 1 2 Goals and General Policies 2 3 Environments and Use-Element Policies 3 4 Natural Systems Regulations 12 4.01 Marine Beaches 13 4.02 Spits and Bars 15 4.03 Dunes 16 4.04 Islands 17 4.05 Estuaries 18 4.06 Reefs 19 4.07 Bays, Coves, and Headlands 20 4.08 Marshes, Bogs, and Swamps 22 4.09 Lakes 24 4.10 Rivers, Streams, and Creeks 26 4.11 Flood Plains 28 4.12 Subtidal Shorelines 30 4.13 Shoreline Cliffs 31 5 Use Activity Regulations 33 5.01 Agricultural Practices 34 5.02 Aquaculture 35 5.03 Forest Management Practices 39 5.04 Commercial Development 41 5.05 Marinas and Boat Launching Facilities 43 5.06 Mining 45 5.07 Outdoor Advertising (Signs and Billboards) 47 5.08 Residential Development 49 5.09 Utilities 53 5.10 Ports and Water-Related Industries 54 5.11 Bulkheads 56 5.12 Breakwaters 58 5.13 Jetties and Groins 60 5.14 Landfill and Solid Waste Disposal 62 5.15 Dredging 64 5.16 Shoreline Protection 66 5.17 Roads and Railroad Design and Construction 68 5.18 Piers, Docks, Floats, Mooring
    [Show full text]
  • Some Dam – Hydro News
    SSoommee DDaamm –– HHyyddrroo NNeewwss and Other Stuff i 5/01/2009 Quote of Note: Thoughts on the economy: “If you’re in a traffic jam quit whining, it means you have a job” - - Paula Smith “If you have a job it’s a recession, if you’re laid off it’s a depression” - - Common “No nation was ever drunk when wine was cheap.” - - Thomas Jefferson Ron’s wine pick of the week: Maipe Bonarda Mendoza, Argentina 2008 OOtthheerr SSttuuffffff::: (Oops, a funny thing happened on the way to the office, they forgot about or don’t know about pumped storage hydro, the ideal backup solution. They got it right on the other points though.) Getting real on wind and solar By James Schlesinger and Robert L. Hirsch, Washington Post, 04/24/2009 Why are we ignoring things we know? We know that the sun doesn't always shine and that the wind doesn't always blow. That means that solar cells and wind energy systems don't always provide electric power. Nevertheless, solar and wind energy seem to have captured the public's support as potentially being the primary or total answer to our electric power needs. Solar cells and wind turbines are appealing because they are "renewables" with promising implications and because they emit no carbon dioxide during operation, which is certainly a plus. But because both are intermittent electric power generators, they cannot produce electricity "on demand," something that the public requires. We expect the lights to go on when we flip a switch, and we do not expect our computers to shut down as nature dictates.
    [Show full text]
  • Bicycling the O Lympic Peninsula
    Eastern Clallam County Bicycle Map Be Visible • Be Alert • Wear a Helmet • Have Fun RCW 46.61.755 states: Signal before turns and lane Be visible day or night. Be courteous. Choose the best way to turn left: Ride defensively. Be aware of other Ride predictably. changes. Wear bright clothes. Traffic laws apply to persons ❚ LIKE a CAR—scan behind, yield, signal vehicles. Leave adequate space between you and riding bicycles. Audibly alert pedestrians as Check behind and ahead before RCW 46.61.780 states: you approach. and when safe, move into the left lane Do not pass on the right. parked cars. and turn left. Obey all traffic signs, signals and turning. At night you must have a Be careful of opening car doors. laws. Ride in the same direction white headlight and taillight Yield to pedestrians in the ❚ LIKE a PEDESTRIAN—dismount and CAUTION: Always watch for cars as traffic. Yield to vehicles with the or red rear reflector. crosswalk. walk your bike across the intersection stopping or turning. Do not weave in and out of parked cars right-of-way. in the crosswalk. and traffic. Twin Salt Creek County Park Crescent Bay Strait of Juan de Fuca Agate Bay d R r e Lyre River Pvt. Beach To iv gate R n d Clallam Bay i R w r T e d Pvt. t iv s R and Sekiu R Field Creek Lower Elwha Klallam e re r y e Crescent School W L . v i Striped Indian Reservation W R (Parking in South Whiskey Creek e r Peak End of Bus Route y end of lot beside gate L Salt Creek .
    [Show full text]
  • Steelhead Response to the Removal of the Elwha River Dams
    Steelhead response to the removal of the Elwha River Dams Photo by John McMillan Pacific Coast Steelhead Management Conference March 22 2018 Walla Walla, WA Acknowledgements Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe Mike McHenry, Ray Moses, Larry Ward, Mel Elofson, Sonny Sampson, Wilson Wells, John Mahan, Doug Morill, Robert Dohrn, Randall McCoy, Matt Beirne National Park Service Brian Winter, Anna Geffre, Josh Geffre, Heidi Hugunin, Phil Kennedy, Sam Brenkman, Pat Crain, Kathryn Sutton NOAA Fisheries George Pess, Martin Liermann, Todd Bennett, Steve Corbett, Oleksandr Stefankiv, Amilee Wilson, Zach Hughes, Tim Tynan, Eric Ward USGS Jeff Duda, Andy Ritchie, Chris Curran, Amy East, Jon Warrick Trout Unlimited WDFW US Fish and Wildlife Service John McMillan Joe Anderson, Chris O’Connell, Randy Roger Peters US Bureau of Reclamation Cooper, Mike Gross, Andrew Claiborne & K Denton & Associates Jennifer Bountry, Tim Randle WDFW Fish Ageing Laboratory Keith Denton Elwha River 833 km2 watershed Elwha Dam • built 1913 • 32 m tall • River km 8 Glines Canyon Dam • Built 1927 • 64 m tall • River km 21 Pess et al. 2008 NW Science 115 km of habitat upstream of Elwha Dam site Photo montage compiled by George Pess Photos from NPS time lapse camera Photo montage compiled by George Pess Photos from NPS time lapse camera Sediment release • 21 million m3 of sediment stored in former reservoirs • 16 million m3 in Lake Mills (upstream of Glines) • 5 million m3 in Lake Aldwell (upstream of Elwha) • Approximately two-thirds evacuated from former reservoirs • 90% delivered to
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Recovery Unit Implementation Plan for Bull Trout (Salvelinus Confluentus)
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Coastal Recovery Unit Implementation Plan for Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) Top left: Clackamas bull trout reintroduction, Clackamas River, Oregon. David Herasimtschuk, Freshwaters Illustrated; Top, right: Glines Canyon Dam removal, Elwha River, Washington. John Gussman, Doubleclick Productions; Center: South Fork Skagit River and Skagit Bay, Washington. City of Seattle; Bottom: Riverscape surveys, East Fork Quinault River, Washington. National Park Service, Olympic National Park Coastal Recovery Unit Implementation Plan for Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) September 2015 Prepared by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Washington Fish and Wildlife Office Lacey, Washington and Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office Portland, Oregon Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................. A-1 Current Status of Bull Trout in the Coastal Recovery Unit ........................................................ A-6 Factors Affecting Bull Trout in the Coastal Recovery Unit ....................................................... A-8 Ongoing Coastal Recovery Unit Conservation Measures (Summary) ..................................... A-33 Research, Monitoring, and Evaluation ..................................................................................... A-38 Recovery Measures Narrative ................................................................................................... A-39 Implementation Schedule for
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Survey Report for Lake Mills and Lake Aldwell on the Elwha River, Washington
    Technical Report No. SRH-2010-23 2010 Survey Report for Lake Mills and Lake Aldwell on the Elwha River, Washington Lake Mills photograph courtesy of Tom Rooda at Northwest Territories Inc. U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Technical Service Center Denver, Colorado April 2011 – Amended June 2011 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Technical Service Center Denver, Colorado 2010 Survey Report and Area-Capacity Tables for Lake Mills and Lake Aldwell on the Elwha River, Washington Report Prepared by: Jennifer Bountry, P.E., M.S., Hydraulic Engineer Sedimentation and River Hydraulics Group, Technical Service Center Ron Ferrari, Hydraulic Engineer Sedimentation and River Hydraulics Group, Technical Service Center Kurt Wille, Physical Scientist Sedimentation and River Hydraulics Group, Technical Service Center Tim J. Randle, P.E., M.S., D.WRE., Hydraulic Engineer and Manager Sedimentation and River Hydraulics Group, Technical Service Center Peer Review Certification: This document has been peer reviewed per guidelines established by the Technical Service Center and is believed to be in accordance with the service agreement and standards of the profession. REPORT PREPARED B DATE Jni^fef BounxE., M.S. P}\'(sical Scientist Sedimentation and River y raulics Group (8 6-6 8240) DATE: Hydraulic Eng Sedimentation and River Hydraulics Group (86-68240) DATE: )-I7- I) Kurt Wille Physical Scientist Sedimentation and River Hydraulics Group (86-68240) DATE:?- 26- 2/( Tim J.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Monitoring Options for Assessing the Response of Salmonids and Their Aquatic Ecosystems in the Elwha River Following Dam Removal
    Michael L. McHenry1, Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, Fisheries Department, 51 Hatchery Road, Port Angeles, Washington 98363 and George R. Pess, NOAA Fisheries, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, 2725 Montlake Boulevard East, Seattle, Washington 98112 An Overview of Monitoring Options for Assessing the Response of Salmonids and Their Aquatic Ecosystems in the Elwha River Following Dam Removal Abstract Removal of two hydroelectric dams on the Elwha River, Washington, one of the largest river restoration projects in the United States, represents a unique opportunity to assess the recovery of fish populations and aquatic ecosystems at the watershed scale. The current project implementation does not contain sufficient funding to support comprehensive monitoring of restoration ef- fectiveness. As a result, current monitoring efforts are piecemeal and uncoordinated, creating the possibility that project managers will not be able to answer fundamental questions concerning salmonid and ecosystem response. We present the initial elements of a monitoring framework designed to assess the effectiveness of dam removal on the recovery of Elwha River salmonids, their aquatic habitats, and the food webs of which they are an integral component. The monitoring framework is linked to the Elwha Fisheries Restoration Plan, which outlines the restoration of native stocks of salmon and relies upon a process of adaptive manage- ment. The monitoring framework includes two areas of emphasis—salmonid population recovery and ecosystem response. We provide study design considerations and make recommendations for additional monitoring efforts prior to dam removal. Based on a power analysis, we determined that a minimum of 3–11 years and up to 50 years of monitoring will be required to capture potential ecosystem responses following dam removal.
    [Show full text]
  • The Elwha River Ecosystem Restoration Project: a Case Study of Government-To-Government Co-Management
    The Elwha River Ecosystem Restoration Project: A Case Study of Government-to-Government Co-Management Haley L. Harguth A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Marine Affairs University of Washington 2013 Committee: David Fluharty Craig Thomas Program Authorized to Offer Degree: School of Marine & Environmental Affairs ©Copyright 2013 Haley L. Harguth University of Washington Abstract Evaluating Co-Management at the Elwha River Ecosystem Restoration Project Haley L. Harguth Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor David Fluharty School of Marine & Environmental Affairs The contribution of indigenous groups in natural resource management is generally believed to enhance management practices and produce positive outcomes for its participants, by improving stewardship and encouraging power-sharing arrangements, among other outcomes. For federally recognized Native American communities, government-to-government co-management relationships with the U.S. federal government have provided opportunities to modernize the treaty trust relationship, and enrich linkages between environmental ethics and cultural heritage, building tribal capacity and autonomy. The case of the Elwha River dam removal and ecosystem restoration on the Olympic Peninsula in Washington State presents an opportunity to demonstrate the progress made in consultation practices and co-management efforts on the behalf of the U.S. government, in the execution of the largest dam removal project ever attempted. For the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, river restoration will re-connect the Tribe to the legendary salmon runs that are its cultural livelihood. The co-management relationship established between the project’s two lead actors, the National Park Service and the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, has demonstrated the positive outcomes of a mutually respected process facilitated through power-sharing, as well as the dilemma for tribal decision-makers in maintaining cultural tradition and engaging in environmental management under congressional mandates.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Olympics
    VOICE of the WILD OLYMPICS The Natural History of a Coastal Prairie In Olympic National Park by Ed Tisch Olympic Although typically they are forested, the tween Cape Alava and the north end of Lake Park Olympic lowlands support a sizeable number Ozette, belongs in the wet prairie category. It, Associates of coastal prairies. Harlan Bretz, an early too, has had a long fire history. In a recent in- Founded in 1948 Washington geologist, reported in 1913 that terview with Myra Vanderhoof, one of the last many of these occupy glacial outwash plains children born to homesteaders at the now-ex- and moraines (e.g., near Shelton and Sequim) tinct Lake Ozette settlement, she informed me Volume 10, No 2 where excessively-drained, gravelly soils pro- that in the early 1900s the white settlers found Spring 2002 duce summer-arid conditions. Fire has also an abundance of fire-scarred trees in the for- contributed to the sparsely-forested character ests adjoining Ahlstrom’s Prairie to the west. Contents of these “prairies,” which sometimes resemble At that time most of the trees between Ozette oak savannas. G.N. Jones, a 1937 University of and Cape Alava also seemed smaller than they Washington graduate student, felt that these are today. The homesteaders assumed that the OPA Meeting Schedule 2 “constituted the nearest approach to a grass- local Ozette Indians had burned their prairies land formation” in the Puget Trough region. to eliminate trees and to keep down the salal Congressional In stark contrast, however, the coastal prai- understories. When Myra first visited Contacts 2 ries of the rainy western Olympics are bog-like Ahlstrom’s Prairie, around 1927, she found it Roadless Bill ? 3 and tend to occur on clayey glacial tills where very sparsely forested.
    [Show full text]
  • Salmon Vs. Dams: the Dam Removal Debate on the Elwha River
    Salmon vs. Dams: The Dam Removal Debate on the Elwha River Teachers: This lesson contains a classroom project with background related to the AFG video clips about salmon vs. dams. These parts may be used individually or together, depending on the needs of your class. Note: You can access and view the video clips used in this lesson in the Teacher Resources section of the AFG Web site www.pbs.org/americanfieldguide/teachers. Grade Level: 10-12 Background Hydroelectric Power has long been touted as a clean alternative source of energy. It produces roughly 70% of the power in the Pacific Northwest. However, hydroelectric is not without its costs. Salmon runs on the major river systems, such as the Columbia River, and on minor rivers, such as the Elwha River in Olympic National Park, have suffered greatly in recent decades, and some of these salmon species are becoming listed as endangered or threatened species. Today, large dams on the Columbia River, owned by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) provide the majority of power for the Pacific Northwest. Yet hundreds of small, privately owned dams are scattered around the region. These are in various states of disrepair, and often only provide enough power to fuel a small community or one or two factories. However, these dams do as much or more damage to the salmon runs in their area than the large dams (BPA dams have extensive programs to help the fish successfully navigate the dams). This lesson is derived from real testimony given to Congress regarding two of these small dams in the pristine Olympic National Park in Washington.
    [Show full text]