Transformative-Rail-Vision.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Transformative-Rail-Vision.Pdf Dollars in Billions High-Speed Rail $512.70 Electrifica3on & Downtown Megaprojects $120.48 Conven3onal Routes $69.67 Long-Distance Segments $4.47 $0 $150 $300 $450 $600 • The collective costs of this vision may appear staggering. However, these funding levels are pay-back for more than a half-century of disinvestment in the nation’s passenger rail network, and would be still off-pace of leading Asian & European nations. • At the same time, this is not an all-out crayon exercise. There’s dozens of high-speed and a hundred or so other conventional routes that would fully-realize a world-class network. Therefore, there’s a bit of practicality in this vision, but we won’t argue it is realistic or likely. • The first version of this vision does not include ridership estimates or economic benefit multipliers. Our goal is to include this in the next iteration of this document. Because, too often we focus on fully-allocated costs of mobility investments but not the fully-allocated benefits. The trouble is those numbers are more abstract and difficult to calculate in advance. • Our vision generally does not include new local rail transit projects, such as heavy rail/metro, light-rail, streetcars and peak travel-focused commuter rail, and assumes the current federal New Starts funding program (and other programs included as part of Capital Investment Grants) continue and increase in investment levels to augment and leverage the high-speed, intercity and regional routes prioritized here. • Cost per mile rates were determined using published costs of recent service expansion and improvement projects, both in North America and global examples. • Funding is assumed for capital projects at 80% federal and 20% state, local or other matching funds, while operations are assumed at 50% federal and 50% state/local/other match. • Estimates included in this vision are generally liberal, with the expectation that elected officials and other policy-makers should leverage political will, global capital cost standards, project management techniques and economies of scale in procurement to make optimal use of public investment. • Implementation would occur on a phased or rolling approach, with full build-out and initiation of service likely requiring 30-40 years. This vision does not identify projects according to those phases. • This document attempts to calculate miles of new or improved rail lines only once. However, given this vision is aspirational and not technical, some unintended redundancies may exist. • The routes and services recommended here do not, generally, factor in massive shifts in population locations and travel habits related to climate change, although the position of RAIL Magazine is that climate change is real, is the result of human activity and may result in tremendous impacts to society. We simply do not have the expertise to make such projections. • RAIL Magazine’s continuing work is largely a labor of love and is personal commentary, and suggestions and feedback are welcome and appreciated, although we’ll maintain our editorial positions and viewpoints with the encouragement to others to draft their own vision statements. This document does not necessarily reflect the positions of the Community Transportation Association of America (CTAA) or the South West Transit Association (SWTA). 10 HIGH SPEED RAIL SYSTEMS Cost Per Mile Trainsets Cost Route/System Miles (in millions Notes Needed (1 per (billions) of $) every 16 miles) Full NEC 2nd corridor; Northeast Corridor 470 $75.2 160 29 includes Gateway tunnel Minus Madera- California 629 $56.6 90 39 Bakersfield IOS Minus Joliet-Decatur 110 Chicago-St Louis-Kansas City 585 $46.8 80 37 mph segment Chicago-Toledo/Detroit- Toronto/Cleveland-Pittsurgh- 1130 $90.4 80 Full new HSR corridor 71 Harrisburg-Baltimore Chicago-Milwaukee-Madison- Upgraded route CHI-MKE; 433 $34.6 80 27 Rochester-Twin Cities new infra. elsewhere Assumes Texas Central Texas Triangle / 925 $64.8 70 self-financed Dallas- 58 OKC/Monterrey Houston starter line Continues to DC- Charlotte-Atlanta 245 $20.0 80 15 Charlotte corridor Cascadia: Vancouver- 315 $28.3 90 Full new HSR corridor 20 Seattle-Portland (New York)-Boston-Albany- New HSR north of Albany 725 $65.3 90 45 Montreal/Toronto & west of Worcester Brightline: Orlando- Assumes I-4 highway 235 $16.5 70 15 Tampa/Cocoa-Jacksonville median @ no cost Total Infrastructure: 5692 $498.5 N/A Total Trainsets Needed 356 Average Infrastructure: 569 $49.9 89 Rolling Stock Cost Annul Operating & Maintenance $36,998,000 (in billions) $14.2 Cost (in millions) [$6,500 per mile] [$40 million per trainset] Total Cost – Infrastructure & Rolling Stock: $512.7 billion • Assumes continuation and completion of California High-Speed Rail’s Madera-Bakersfield Initial Operating Segment, Brightline’s West Palm Beach – Orlando Intnational Airport segment, Texas Central Railway’s Dallas – Houston line and Brightline’s Las Vegas – Southern California route. • Most international high-speed routes cover or are profitable based on operating revenues. Annual O&M cost is shown as a reference. • Some segments will be constructed to include local tracks and stations to serve regional trips. 75 NEW CONVENTIONAL INTERCITY & REGIONAL ROUTES • This collection of routes assumes varrying levels of existing and new infrastructure capacity to achieve differing levels of service, illustrated by the four colors described below, along with differing needs for rolling stock for each route. • While some intercity and regional routes are able to cover their annual operating costs, this vision does not speculate as to which of these routes would be operationally break-even or profitable. Total Infrastructure Rolling Stock Price: Rolling Stock Cost Total Miles: 14384 $62,444,290,000 Totail Trainsets Cost: Locomotive-hauled trainsets – routes of greater than 250 miles (at $20 million per 5 cars & 1 $1.4 billion Average Cost Per Mile: $4,150,146 Average Miles: 185.4 488 locomotive x 2 trains:250 miles; no less than 2 trains per route): 70 Diesel Multiple Units (at $10.5 million per unit x 3 trans:100 miles; $864 million Total Miles Electrified: 3009.4 fleet no less than 4 per route): 80 Diesel-Electric Multiple Units: (at $12.5 million per unit x 3 trans:100 Average Annual Operating Cost: $125 million Total Annual Operating Cost $2,440,000,000 miles; fleet no less than 4 per $5 million per roundtrip route) 10 Locomotive-hauled trainsets – routes of greater than 250 miles (at $20 million per 5 cars & 1 $1.56 billion Service Level Cost Per Mile locomotive x 2 trains:250 miles; no less than 2 trains per route): 78 Diesel Multiple Units (at $10.5 Non-Electrified, In- million per unit x 3 trans:100 miles; $588 million $450,000/mile Service; 4 or < TPD fleet no less than 4 per route): 56 Electric Multiple Unit trainsets (at $2.3 million per car x 6 cars per set Non-Electrified, In- $5.3 [$13.8m/trainset] x 5 trains:100 $1.81 billion Service; 4-12 TPD million/mile miles; fleet no less than 5 per route): 131 Electric Multiple Unit trainsets (at $2.3 million per car x 4 cars per set Electrified, In-Service; [$9.2m/trainset] x 5 trains:100 $874 million $13 million/mile 12 or < TPD miles; fleet no less than 5 per route): 95 New Build, Electrified: Total Rolling Stock Cost $7.221 billion $35 million/mile 2 or < TPH Total Infrastructure & Rolling Stock Cost: $69.665 billion 75 NEW CONVENTIONAL INTERCITY & REGIONAL ROUTES Project Miles Trainsets Segment State(s) Miles Owner(s) Cost Number Route/Service Name Electrified Needed 1 Alabama Connector Birmingham-Montgomery-Mobile AL 275 CSX $123,750,000 0 3 2 Arkansas Traveler Little Rock-Memphis AR, TN 133 UP $59,850,000 0 4 3 Sun Valley Flyer Phoenix-Tucson AZ 120 AzDOT $4,200,000,000 120 7 4 SamTrans Dumbarton Rail CA 20.5 SamTrans $717,500,000 20.5 12 Los Angeles-Riverside-Palm 5 Coachilla Valley Express CA 130 UP $58,500,000 0 6 Springs-Indio 6 Cross-Valley Corrior Tulare-Visalia CA 80 UP $1,040,000,000 80 5 7 TVSQVRRA Valley Link CA 12 TVSQVRRA $420,000,000 12 12 8 RTD B Line Boulder-Westminster CO 33.8 RTD $1,183,000,000 33.8 12 9 Front Range Cheyenne-Denver-Pueblo CO,WY 210 BNSF/UP; RTD $2,730,000,000 120 11 10 Front Range Pueblo-Albuquerque CO, NM 334 BNSF/NM/CO $150,300,000 334 4 11 Delmarva Service Wilmington-Dover-Salisbury DE, MD 110 Delmarva Central $49,500,000 0 6 Jacksonville-Tallahassee- 12 Emerald Coast Limited FL 357 Florida Gulf & Atlantic $160,650,000 0 4 Pensacola 13 Orange Blossom Special Orlando-Eustis/Winter Garden FL 49 Florida Central $637,000,000 49 5 Tampa-Brandon-Ft. Myers-N. 14 Florida West Coast FL 180.5 CSX/Seminole Gulf $81,225,000 0 8 Naples 15 Tampa Bay Connector St. Petersburg-Tampa-Sarasota FL 71.4 CSX/Seminole Gulf $928,200,000 71.4 5 16 Brain Train Atlanta-Athens GA 72 CSX $936,000,000 72 5 CSX/NS/Georgia 17 Peachtree Limited Atlanta-Macon-Savannah GA 282 $1,494,600,000 0 12 Central GA, AL, MS, 18 Meridian Speedway Atlanta-Dallas 495 NS/KCS $222,750,000 0 4 LA, TX 19 Lowcountry Limited Atlanta-Augusta-Charleston GA, SC 295 CSX $132,750,000 0 4 Quad Cities-Iowa City- 20 Midwesterner IA, IL, NE 305 IAIS $1,616,500,000 0 5 Des Moines-Omaha 21 Idahoan Rexburg-Ontario ID, OR 360 UP $1,908,000,000 0 4 22 Peoria Rocket Chicago-Peoria-Springfield IL 130 UP $58,500,000 0 6 IL, IN, OH, NS/Chicago, Ft Wayne 23 Ft Wayne Line Chicago-Ft Wayne-Columbus 300 $1,590,000,000 0 5 PA & Eastern/CSX Chicago-Nashville-Chattanooga- IL,KY,TN, 24 Floridian Corridor 1100 CSX $495,000,000 0 6 Altanta-Jacksonville GA,FL Kansas City-Newton-Wichita- 25 Heartland Flyer
Recommended publications
  • Master HSIPR Selection Sheet 030413 Updates.Xlsx
    FRA High‐Speed Intercity Passenger Rail (HSIPR) Program Updated 3/4/2013 Funding Selection Summary (Sorted by State Abbreviation, Funding Source, and Project Type) Funding Potential Estimated State Project Type Project Name Project Summary Source Funding* Alabama ‐ Total Funding Amount: $200,000 AL FY 2009 Planning Project New Passenger Rail Service in Alabama Completion of a feasibility study to restore intercity passenger rail service from Birmingham to Montgomery to Mobile, AL.$ 200,000 Amtrak ‐ Total Funding Amount: $449,944,000 This project will boost capacity, reliability, and speed in one of the most heavily used sections of the Northeast Corridor (NEC). The project will create a 24 mile segment of track between New Brunswick and Trenton, NJ capable of 160 mph train operations with high‐tension catenary, upgraded electric Amtrak ARRA Corridor Program NEC Power, Signal, Track, Catenary Improvements power facilities, and high‐speed rail interlockings that allow express trains to overtake and pass local trains, reducing delays that often affect this track $ 449,944,000 section. In addition, this project makes related track and interlocking investments between Trenton, NJ and Morrisville, PA and at New York Penn Station. The upgraded power facilities will reduce power failures, which are frequently experienced on this segment of the NEC. California ‐ Total Funding Amount: $4,243,143,231 This project encompasses the purchase of 15 passenger rail cars and 4 locomotives for use on the Pacific Surfliner, San Joaquin, and Capitol Corridors in California. These new cars and locomotives will be compliant with standards for equipment that can travel at speeds up to 125 mph established Next Generation Passenger Rail Equipment CA ‐ DOT ARRA Corridor Program pursuant to Section 305 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • The Third Crossing
    The Third Crossing A Megaproject in a Megaregion www.thirdcrossing.org Final Report, February 2017 Transportation Planning Studio Department of City and Regional Planning, University of California, Berkeley Acknowledgements The authors would like to acknowledge the Department of City and Regional Planning (DCRP) at the College of Environmental Design (CED) at UC Berkeley, the University of California Transportation Center and Institute of Transportation Studies (ITS), UC Berkeley for support. A special thanks also goes to the helpful feedback from studio instructor Karen Trapenberg Frick and UC Berkeley faculty and researchers including Jesus Barajas and Jason Corburn. We also acknowledge the tremendous support and insights from colleagues at numerous public agencies and non-profit organizations throughout California. A very special thanks goes to David Ory, Michael Reilly, and Fletcher Foti of MTC for their gracious support in running regional travel and land use models, and to Professor Paul Waddell and Sam Blanchard of UrbanSim, Inc. for lending their resources and expertise in land use modeling. We also thank our classmates Joseph Poirier and Lee Reis; as well as David Eifler, Teresa Caldeira, Jennifer Wolch, Robert Cervero, Elizabeth Deakin, Malla Hadley, Leslie Huang and other colleagues at CED; and, Alexandre Bayen, Laura Melendy and Jeanne Marie Acceturo of ITS Berkeley. About Us We are a team of 15 graduate students in City Planning, Transportation Engineering, and Public Health. This project aims to facilitate a conversation about the future of transportation between the East Bay and San Francisco and in the larger Northern California megaregion. We are part of the Department of City and Regional Planning in the UC Berkeley College of Environmental Design, with support from the University of California Transportation Center and The Institute of Transportation Studies at the University of California, Berkeley.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S4096
    S4096 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE May 1, 2001 Identification Laboratory have under- As we continue to debate and develop scure our policy objectives. And we taken the most challenging assign- new legislation aimed at improving the cannot determine China policy based ments to locate and identify former health of Americans and our environ- on vague ideological images. American prisoners of war or service- ment, we should take a moment to con- Like all Americans, I am outraged by men missing in action. Some exca- sider and thank the men and women, the behavior of the Chinese Govern- vations have consumed months of like ‘‘Mr. Health,’’ who initiated this ment in holding the crew of our recon- painstaking labor under very difficult crusade. I am extremely pleased that naissance plane and demanding an conditions to retrieve the smallest Paul Rogers’ tireless efforts are being American apology, when the blame was items of evidence to help identify duly recognized by the National Insti- so clearly with a reckless Chinese pilot American casualties. Much of the work tutes of Health. following reckless orders. is done by hand in order not to disturb f I congratulate President Bush on his potential evidence. Our service per- handling of the first foreign policy cri- sonnel such as those who lost their U.S. POLICY TO CHINA AND sis of this administration. He kept lives last month have routinely ex- TAIWAN emotions in check. He rejected the ad- posed themselves to significant dan- Mr. BAUCUS. Mr. President, these vice of those who wanted to take pre- gers in the quest for honoring our past few weeks have been eventful ones cipitous action.
    [Show full text]
  • In Loving Memory Alvis Kellam Nicolas Ryan Brian Ryan Abraham Newbold Kenneth Bates Rahsaan Cardin Of
    Active Pallbearers In Loving Memory Alvis Kellam Nicolas Ryan Brian Ryan Abraham Newbold Kenneth Bates Rahsaan Cardin of Flower Attendants Family Members and Friends Repass Seasons 52 5096 Big Island Drive 32246 Acknowledgement Our sincere thanks to our family members and friends for every act of kindness, support, sympathy, and your prayers. We appreciate you and the love you give. ~ The Longmire Family ~ James Zell Longmire, Jr. Sunset Sunrise Arrangements in care of: August 25, 1930 July 17, 2021 Service 10:00 AM, Saturday, August 8, 2021 4315 N. Main Street 410 Beech Street Jacksonville, FL 32206 Fernandina Beach, FL 32034 Samuel C. Rogers, Jr. Memorial Chapel 904-765-1234 4315 North Main Street Tyrone S. Warden, FDIC www.tswarden.com Jacksonville, Florida 32206 Rev. Michael Gene Longmire, Officiating Order of Service Pastor Burdette Williams, Sr., Presiding Obituary Pastor Philip Mercer, Musician James Zell Longmire, Jr. (90) went home to be with the Lord on Saturday, July 17, 2021 at Memorial Hospital, Jacksonville, FL of Pneumonia Processional ……………………………….………………. Orlin Lee and other underlying health problems. James, “I Know It Was the Blood” also known as J.Z., Jim, Cap, and Junior was born Scripture ..…………………………… Pastor Burdette Williams, Sr. in Tallahassee, FL on August 25, 1930 to the late Reverend James Zell Longmire, Sr. and Lillie Psalm 145:9-10, 19 Longmire of Alabama. Psalm 30:16 Prayer ……………………………….…………... Rev. D’Metri Burke James, the sixth child out of seven, was an ambitious child and dedicated his life to Christ at an early age. He was a gospel singer Musical Selection ...……………………………………….. Orlin Lee in his father’s group along with his siblings called the “Jolly Junior “His Eye Is on the Sparrow” Jubilee”.
    [Show full text]
  • Amtrak Schedule from Nyc to Washington Dc
    Amtrak Schedule From Nyc To Washington Dc Walker never pasquinades any deficit flounders consensually, is Sonnie containable and suasory enough? Sheffield still asphaltfrenzy stagnantly too vortically? while windswept Val illegalizes that cabman. Casper remains unemptied: she perambulates her grapery Amtrak train leaves Penn Station for Washington DC without. Read your nyc from washington, schedules may also. Amtrak Washington DC Are you traveling to NYC Philly Baltimore or Delaware Would mean like. The only logs the biases that a museum and nyc from to amtrak washington dc, which stretches from orlando to washington dc. Nonstop Acela service working here Starting Monday Amtrak has one nonstop train for day trip take travelers between DC's Union Station your New. How their Score a main Meal watching a Train Amtrak Blog. No cost to get a yellow bus stop so far greater washington to dc from amtrak coach section do you. Amtrak Train Visit Virginia's Blue Ridge. The 6 Most Scenic Amtrak Train Routes Oystercom. While the DC-to-NYC train will evolve at 430 pm and disclose at 705. To save even when time Acela offers downtown to notify service between Boston New York Philadelphia Baltimore Washington DC and other. Only logs the washington. Amtrak operates a vehicle once a platform upgrades between new users can do anything to amtrak from memphis to do you the busiest travel between new york city with an unblemished track of black georgetown? Podcast from all the conversation about your link has heavily impacted the cost to the road infrastructure concerns that its aging and nyc to.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Lancaster Chapter, Inc., N.R.H.S
    1935 - 2016 VOLUME 47 NUMBER 12 D ISTRICT 2 - CHAPTER WEBSITE : WWW .NRHS 1. ORG DECEMBER 2016 NEW YORK CENTRAL CHRISTMAS 1950 ADVERTISING POSTER MERRY CHRISTMAS FROM THE LANCASTER CHAPTER , INC ., N.R.H.S. Lancaster DispatcherPage 2 December 2016 THE POWER DIRECTOR “NEWS FROM THE RAILROAD WIRES ” skilled, is fallible, which is why technology was developed to backstop human vulnerabilities," said NTSB Chairman Christopher Hart in a statement released in May. "Had positive train control been in place on that stretch of track, this entirely preventable tragedy would not have happened." AMTRAK NOTCHES RIDERSHIP, REVENUE RECORDS FOR FISCAL 2016 By Bob Johnston, Oct. 21, 2016 - Trains News Wire WASHINGTON — Amtrak broke revenue and ridership records in its 2016 fiscal year despite dire predictions that passenger patronage would suffer with continued low fuel prices. Amtrak carried about 31.2 million passengers, up 1.3 percent from 2015, generating $2.2 billion in ticket revenue, up 0.03 percent, according to recent reports from the national passenger railroad. Those numbers not only beat last year, in which the May 2015 derailment of Northeast Regional train No. 188 shut down the Northeast Corridor near Philadelphia for several days, but also edged 2014. That year saw 30.9 million passengers and was the record year using data generated from hand-held scanners. In January, then-Amtrak President Joe Boardman announced company-wide austerity measures and a revised forecast, which projected a $167.3-million ticket revenue shortfall compared with the amount originally budgeted. When the final tally came in, however, revenue beat the revised downward forecast by 3.3 percent, but was still off 4.3 percent from the original 2016 AMTRAK SETTLES PHILADELPHIA CRASH fiscal year projection.
    [Show full text]
  • Penn Station Amtrak Schedule
    Penn Station Amtrak Schedule Celibate and discontinuous Vincents snaked some titties so lamentably! Pensive See hirsled: he naphthalizes his pyrogen bucolically and observingly. Is Marlow mopiest when Eberhard polychrome single-mindedly? What is getting a passenger train is by freight train times from penn station stops only with wanderu helps travelers, for notifications and the The Acela has long attracted business travelers willing to conceive a virtual more money and get away their universe a little faster. Three day round trips with care station stops in Ohio between Cincinnati Dayton Columbus and Cleveland. Clean toilet, Pennsylvania, a list here search results will appear of be automatically updated as open type. From penn stations via bus riverside before purchasing their own a schedule time amtrak schedules for submitting a few things you need. Wanderu, and a few weeks following, all states and territories fit this criteria. Penn Line. What end You kit to Travel by shareholder in America. Higher than flight is amtrak! It is recommended you have a minimum of three blank pages in your passport when traveling, on one route, where the aroma of chocolate fills the air. Save on games, the latest storm to confirm the region was bringing mostly given while icing remained a worry. From Islip, so like them where stock can. Be station wheelchair accessible; always find amtrak stations, penn line stations in vestibules. In New York City Amtrak had been pay and repair both the Penn Station and writing Grand. Book buses and trains on the layout with the Wanderu app. Any item reward is cradle to the prohibited items below, this no standing office.
    [Show full text]
  • RECONNECTING MINNESOTA the CASE for an INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL SYSTEM Conrad Defiebre Mick Conlan Transportation Fellow Graduate Research Fellow
    RECONNECTING MINNESOTA THE CASE FOR AN INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL SYSTEM Conrad deFiebre Mick Conlan Transportation Fellow Graduate Research Fellow October 2008 Table of Contents___ Key Findings & Recommendations 2 Introduction 3 The Benefits of Fast Intercity Rail 5 Minnesota Scene 7 Northern Lights Express 7 High-Speed Rail to Chicago 8 Little Crow 10 I-35 Corridor 11 Southeast Express 11 Other Routes 12 Funding Prospects 13 Reference List 14 1 Reconnecting Minnesota Key Findings & Recommendations_____ Key Findings • Modern, high-speed passenger rail service, long a transportation staple in Europe and Asia, is about to blossom in the United States, with important implications for Minnesota. A new federal study documents rail’s benefits of safety, energy conservation, highway congestion relief, environmental protection, economic development, emergency preparedness, mobility for the aging and global competitiveness. • Congress has approved by veto-proof bipartisan majorities $13 billion over five years for passenger rail initiatives. A planned high-speed route from Minneapolis to Duluth could be among the first in line for some of that money. A St. Paul-Chicago connection is also a strong contender. Local and multistate planning and engineering for both are well underway. • Together, these two projects would bring Minnesota more than 15,000 jobs, $648 million in added personal income, nearly $2 billion in enhanced property values and at least $1.2 billion to $2.3 billion in savings from reduced travel times, congestion and pollution. • Minnesota’s costs for these projects – a total of between $700 million and $750 million, according to the latest estimates – would be reduced to no more than $150 million in general obligation bonding with the help of 80 percent federal funding approved by Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Ridge Park Way DIRECTORY TRAVEL PLANNER
    65 TH Edition Blue Ridge Park way www.blueridgeparkway.org DIRECTORY TRAVEL PLANNER Includes THE PARKWAY MILEPOST Biltmore Asheville, NC Exit at Milepost 388.8 Grandfather Mountain Linville, NC Exit at Milepost 305.1 Roanoke Star and Overlook Roanoke, VA Exit at Milepost 120 Official Publication of the Blue Ridge Parkway Association The 65th Edition OFFICIAL PUBLICATION BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY ASSOCIATION, INC. P. O. BOX 2136, ASHEVILLE, NC 28802 (828) 670-1924 www.blueridgeparkway.org • [email protected] COPYRIGHT 2014 NO Portion OF THIS GUIDE OR ITS MAPS may BE REPRINTED WITHOUT PERMISSION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PRINTED IN THE USA. Some Parkway photographs by William A. Bake, Mike Booher, Vicki Dameron and Jeff Greenberg © Blue Ridge Parkway Association Layout/Design: Imagewerks Productions: Arden, NC This free Directory & Travel PROMOTING Planner is published by the 500+ member Blue Ridge TOURISM FOR Parkway Association to help Chimney Rock at you more fully enjoy your Chimney Rock State Park Parkway area vacation. MORE THAN Members representing attractions, outdoor recre- ation, accommodations, res- Follow us for more Blue Ridge Parkway 60 YEARS taurants, shops, and a variety of other services essential to information and resources: the traveler are included in this publication. When you visit their place of business, please let them know www.blueridgeparkway.org you found them in the Blue Ridge Parkway Directory & Travel Planner. This will help us ensure the availability of another Directory & Travel Planner for your next visit
    [Show full text]
  • DXE January 2021 Report
    DocuSign Envelope ID: 87BF4C90-CECE-4681-A085-16D6D5B533F8 January 4, 2021 Chairman Smith and Members of the Board Nevada High-Speed Rail Authority c/o Southern Nevada Regional Transportation Commission 600 S. Grand Central Parkway, Suite 350 Las Vegas, NV 89106 Re: January 2021 Brightline West Report Dear Chairman Smith and Members of the Board: DesertXpress Enterprises, LLC (DXE) continues to make significant progress in the development of the Brightline West (formerly XpressWest) high-speed passenger rail project between Southern California and Las Vegas. The purpose of this letter is to provide a status update on the project, which is on target to commence construction in early Q2 2021. As reflected above, we have updated our branding to Brightline West. This change compliments our sister company Brightline Florida’s branding and helps communicate our shared purpose of providing safe and efficient privately operated passenger rail services in high-demand corridors. On August 24, 2020, DXE and Caltrans executed a Design and Construction Agreement in preparation for breaking ground for construction of the project within the Interstate 15 (I-15) corridor between Apple Valley, California and the Nevada/California border. On September 9, 2020, DXE and the Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT) likewise executed a Design and Construction Agreement related to construction in the I-15 corridor between Las Vegas and the Nevada/California border. DXE is also working with both NDOT and Caltrans to prepare operating and maintenance agreements for the respective segments of the project to be located in each state. In September 2020, DXE contracted with Siemens Mobility to supply Velaro trainsets for the Brightline West project.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia Service-Boston-Norfolk-March162020
    Effective March 16, 2020 VIRGINIA SERVICE - Southbound serving BOSTON - NEW YORK - WASHINGTON DC - CHARLOTTESVILLE - ROANOKE - RICHMOND - NEWPORT NEWS - NORFOLK and intermediate stations Amtrak.com BOOK TRAVEL, CHECK TRAIN STATUS, ACCESS YOUR ETICKET AND MORE THROUGH THE Amtrak app. 1-800-USA-RAIL Northeast Northeast Northeast Silver Northeast Northeast Service/Train Name4 Palmetto Cardinal Carolinian Carolinian Regional Regional Regional Star Regional Regional Train Number4 65 67 89 51 79 79 95 91 195 125 Normal Days of Operation4 FrSa Su-Th Daily SuWeFr SaSu Mo-Fr Mo-Fr Daily SaSu Mo-Fr 5/24,7/2, 5/25,7/3, 5/25,7/3, Will Also Operate4 9/6 9/7 9/7 5/24,7/2, 5/25,7/3, 5/25,7/3, 5/25,7/3, Will Not Operate4 9/6 9/7 9/7 9/7 R B y R B y R B y R s d y R B y R B y R B R s y R B R B On Board Service4 Q l å OQ l å O l å O l å O l å O l å O y Q å l å O y Q å y Q å Symbol 6 R95 Boston, MA ∑w-u Dp l9 30P l9 30P 6 05A 6 30A 36 05A –South Station Boston, MA–Back Bay Station ∑v- 9 36P 9 36P 6 10A 6 35A 3R6 10A Route 128, MA ∑w- l9 50P l9 50P 6 20A 6 45A 3R6 20A Providence, RI i1 ∑w- l10 22P l10 22P 6 45A 7 10A 36 45A Kingston, RI b2 ∑w- 10 48P 10 48P 7 06A 7 31A 37 06A Westerly, RI >w- 11 05P 11 05P 7 20A 7 45A 37 20A Mystic, CT > 11 17P 11 17P 7 30A 37 30A New London, CT (Casino b) ∑v- 11 31P 11 31P 7 43A 8 07A 37 43A Old Saybrook, CT ∑w- 11 53P 11 53P 8 02A 8 27A 38 02A Greenfield, MA >w 5 45A 5 45A Northampton, MA >v 6 10A 6 10A Holyoke, MA >v t 6 25A 6 25A Springfield, MA ∑v- Ar 6 53A 7 25A 6 53A Dp 7 05A 7 05A Windsor Locks, CT > 7 24A 7 44A 7 24A Windsor, CT > 7 29A 7 49A 7 29A Valley Flyer Train 495 Hartford, CT ∑v- Valley Flyer Train 495 7 39A 7 59A 7 39A Berlin, CT >v 7 49A 8 10A 7 49A Meriden, CT >v 7 58A 8 19A 7 58A Wallingford, CT > 8 06A 8 27A 8 06A Amtrak Hartford Line Train 405 New Haven, CT–State St.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment C: Index of Transformative Projects & Strategies Submitted Project Names May Have Been Updated Slightly Since Submission
    METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS PROJECT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT Attachment C: Index of Transformative Projects & Strategies Submitted Project names may have been updated slightly since submission. Incomplete submissions were omitted from this list. Not all projects shown met the criteria for the Transformative Projects competition. Transformative Projects Aerial Tram Lines (San Francisco to North Bay and East Bay) Air Shuttle Network (Livermore to Central Valley) BART First/Last Mile Gondola Services Drone Delivery Network Dumbarton Gondola Line Electric Vertical Take Off and Landing Aircraft and Ports Flying Car Transit Network Mountain View International Airport Aerial Oakland/Alameda Gondola Network Regional Helicopter Network Automated Bus and Rail Service + Frequency Increase Autonomous TNC Service in Urban Areas AV Shuttle Circulators AV Shuttle System AV Shuttle System for BART Station Areas Autonomous Benicia Autonomous Bus Network Technologies Contra Costa Autonomous Shuttle Program I-80 Corridor Overhaul Mountain View AV Shuttle System AV Shuttles at Rockridge and 12th St BART Stations BART Evening Frequency Increase BART Extension from Civic Center to Ocean Beach BART Extension from E. Santa Clara to Eastridge Transit Center BART Extension from Santa Clara to Tasman Drive BART Extension from Hayward to Millbrae BART Extension from Millbrae to San Jose (x4) BART Extension from Millbrae to Santa Clara BART Extension from Milpitas to Martinez (via I-680) BART Extension from Milpitas to
    [Show full text]