DOCSLIB.ORG

Sociolinguistic Variation in a Second Language: the Influence of Local Accent on the Pronunciation of Non-Native English Speakers Living in Manchester

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sociolinguistic Variation in a Second Language: the Influence of Local Accent on the Pronunciation of Non-Native English Speakers Living in Manchester Sociolinguistic variation in a second language: the influence of local accent on the pronunciation of non-native English speakers living in Manchester A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2010 Rob Drummond School of Languages, Linguistics and Cultures 2 Contents List of Figures .................................................................................................................... 5 List of tables ...................................................................................................................... 7 List of abbreviations ......................................................................................................... .9 Abstract………………………………………………………………………………………………….……….……………10 Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................... 12 1: Introduction ............................................................................................................. 13 1.1 The history of Manchester ...................................................................................14 1.2 Poles in Manchester ............................................................................................ 16 2: Literature review ..................................................................................................... 22 2.1 L2 phonological acquisition - theoretical background ...................................... 22 2.1.1 The influence of the L1 ................................................................................ 22 2.1.2 The role of perception ................................................................................. 23 2.2 The study of language variation ......................................................................... 25 2.3 Variation and SLA ............................................................................................... 26 2.4 Dialect ................................................................................................................. 33 2.4.1 Perception and attitudes ............................................................................. 33 2.4.2 Dialect acquisition ....................................................................................... 38 2.4.3 Dialect acquisition in a second language ................................................... 44 2.5 Factors influencing variation .............................................................................. 50 2.5.1 Age ............................................................................................................... 50 2.5.2 Length of exposure to L2 ............................................................................. 52 2.5.3 L1 background .............................................................................................. 54 2.5.4 Amount of L1/L2 use .................................................................................... 54 2.5.5 Motivation ................................................................................................... 55 2.5.6 Aptitude and proficiency ............................................................................. 57 2.5.7 Formal instruction ....................................................................................... 58 2.5.8 Social Class ................................................................................................... 59 2.5.9 Gender .......................................................................................................... 60 2.5.10 Identity ......................................................................................................... 65 3: The linguistic features ............................................................................................ 70 3.1 STRUT ................................................................................................................. 70 3.2 Glottal variation in /t/ .......................................................................................... 72 3.3 (ing) ..................................................................................................................... 74 3 3.4 h-dropping .......................................................................................................... 77 4: Methodology ........................................................................................................... 78 4.1 Selecting the participants ................................................................................... 78 4.2 Gathering data .................................................................................................... 80 4.2.1 The conversation ......................................................................................... 80 4.2.2 The picture task ........................................................................................... 82 4.2.3 The word list ................................................................................................ 83 4.2.4 The interview ............................................................................................... 83 4.2.5 The questionnaire ........................................................................................ 84 4.2.6 The Matched Guise Test .............................................................................. 85 4.2.7 Summary of data collection methods ......................................................... 86 4.3 Identifying and coding the linguistic variables ................................................. 87 4.3.1 STRUT .......................................................................................................... 87 4.3.2 Glottal variation in /t/ ................................................................................. 90 4.3.3 ing ................................................................................................................. 93 4.3.4 ‘h’ dropping .................................................................................................. 95 4.4 Native speakers ................................................................................................... 96 4.5 Statistical analysis ............................................................................................... 96 4.6 Social factors: coding .......................................................................................... 98 5: Results ................................................................................................................... 100 5.1 STRUT - Results ................................................................................................ 100 5.1.1 Regression analysis .................................................................................... 108 5.1.2 Lexical frequency .........................................................................................115 5.1.3 Linguistic context ....................................................................................... 119 5.2 STRUT - Discussion ........................................................................................... 125 5.2.1 LOR ............................................................................................................. 125 5.2.2 Local NS partner ......................................................................................... 126 5.2.3 Lexical frequency ........................................................................................ 126 5.2.4 Possibility one – a lexical frequency effect ................................................ 127 5.2.5 Possibility two – a phonetic context effect ................................................ 133 5.2.6 Possibility three – no frequency effect. ...................................................... 136 5.2.7 Phonetic context (without frequency)....................................................... 137 5.2.8 Attitude ....................................................................................................... 137 5.3 Glottal variation in /t/ - Results ......................................................................... 139 5.3.1 Regression analysis ..................................................................................... 143 4 5.4 Glottal variation in /t/ - Discussion ................................................................. 148 5.4.1 Level of English .......................................................................................... 149 5.4.2 Gender ........................................................................................................ 149 5.5 (ing) - Results ..................................................................................................... 152 5.5.1 Regression analysis ..................................................................................... 154 5.5.2 Lexical frequency ........................................................................................ 158 5.6 (ing) - Discussion ............................................................................................... 165 5.6.1 Linguistic constraints ................................................................................. 165 5.6.2 Gender ........................................................................................................ 166 5.6.3 Identity ....................................................................................................... 168 5.7 ‘h’ dropping - Results ........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Západočeská Univerzita V Plzni Fakulta Pedagogická Katedra
    Západočeská univerzita v Plzni Fakulta pedagogická Katedra anglického jazyka Bakalářská práce VÝZKUM DIALEKTŮ SPOJENÉHO KRÁLOVSTVÍ Ivan Audes Plzeň 2015 University of West Bohemia Faculty of Education Department of English Undergraduate Thesis DIALECT RESEARCH OF THE UNITED KINGDOM Ivan Audes Pilsen 2015 Prohlašuji, že jsem práci vypracoval samostatně s použitím uvedené literatury a zdrojů informací. V Plzni dne 30.6. 2015 ................................................... Ivan Audes ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my boundless gratitude to my supervisor PhDr. Naděžda Stašková, Ph.D. for her patience and guidance. I would also like to thank my beloved family for their support. ABSTRACT Audes, Ivan. University of West Bohemia, 2015. The Dialect Research of United Kingdom. Supervisor: PhDr. Naděžda Stašková Ph.D This bachelor thesis will consist of two parts - theoretical and practical. In the first part I will explore the term dialect itself and provide understandable definition of all the key words and all the derived expressions concerning this term. The main part of the thesis will be examining various dialects and accents used by people who speak English as their mother tongue and covering all the crucial information about them, e.g. typical features of each dialect, sociolinguistic aspect. I will also explore the historical background and development of each dialect and provide detailed study concerning this issue. I will also inspect the cultural aspect and convey the social development. The research will be divided into 4 parts, each part representing individual country, i.e. dialects of England, Wales, Scotland a Northern Ireland. In the empirical part I will analyze 4 specific dialects (one of each country/the most famous or peculiar ones) through given literary work.
    [Show full text]
  • Access to Electronic Thesis
    Access to Electronic Thesis Author: Jon Fyne Thesis title: The Dialect of New mills: Linguistic Change in a North-West Derbyshire Community Qualification: PhD Date awarded: 16 November 2005 This electronic thesis is protected by the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. No reproduction is permitted without consent of the author. It is also protected by the Creative Commons Licence allowing Attributions-Non-commercial-No derivatives. If this electronic thesis has been edited by the author it will be indicated as such on the title page and in the text. The Dialect of New Mills Linguistic Change in a North-West Derbyshire Community Part 1 Methodology Grammar Lexis Jon Fyne Submitted for the degree of PhD NATCECT, University of Sheffield July, 2005 Abbreviations V Vowel vb. Verb A Adjunct VP Verbal Phrase Adj. Adjective WGer West Germanic Adv. Adverb WM West Midlands ALE Atlas Linguarum Europae WMerc West Mercian C Consonant WSax West Saxon C[x] Cardinal Vowel, x = vowel Yks Yorkshire Ch(s) Cheshire (n,e,s,w = north, east, south, west) (n,e,s,w = north, east, south, west) CG Cheshire Glossary CED Collins’ English Dictionary Der(bys) Derbyshire (n,e,s,w = north, east, south, west) EDD English Dialect Dictionary IPA International PhoneticAlphabet La(ncs) Lancashire (n,e,s,w = north, east, south, west) ME Middle English eME early Middle English lME late Middle English Merc Mercian eModE early Modern English ModE Modern English n. Noun NP Nominal Phrase neCh north-east Cheshire nwDer north-west Derbyshire OA Old Anglian OE Old English lOE late Old English OED Oxford English Dictionary ODa Old Danish OF Old French OIc Old Icelandic OM Old Mercian ON Old Norse ONor Old Norwegian ONmFr Old Norman French Obj.
    [Show full text]
  • (T,D) Deletion, (T) Glottaling, and Their Intersection in East Anglian English
    A Sociolinguistic Survey of (t,d) deletion, (t) glottaling, and their intersection in East Anglian English Carmen Ciancia A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Language and Linguistics University of Essex November 2020 To my beloved grandmother, Angelina, to whom I promised to dedicate this thesis before she left this world. You will always be in my heart, in my mind. Table of Contents List of Tables…………………………………………………………………………vii List of Figures………………………………………………………………………...ix Abstract……………………………………………………………………………….xi Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………xiii Structure of the thesis……………………………………………………...…………xv Chapter 1 – INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………...17 1.1 Motivations to examine (t,d) and (t) in East Anglian English ......................17 1.2 East Anglian history and borders ..................................................................18 1.3 Urban areas and speech communities ...........................................................22 Colchester ..............................................................................................23 Ipswich ...................................................................................................25 Norwich .................................................................................................28 1.4 Broad research questions ..............................................................................29 1.5 Summary .......................................................................................................32 Chapter
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Trudgill
    Curriculum Vitae: PETER TRUDGILL Departamento de Filología Inglesa Facultad de Letras 2018 Curriculum Vitae: Peter Trudgill Address 6 Amelia House Colegate Norwich NR3 1DD Reino Unido Born on November 7, 1943 in Norwich, England E-Mail: [email protected] Appointments •Professor Emeritus of English Linguistics, University of Fribourg, 2005- •Honorary Professor of Sociolinguistics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK 2005- •Department of Foreign Languages, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway: Professor of Sociolinguistics, 2006-2016 •Centre for Research on Language Diversity, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia: Adjunct Professor, 2006-2014 •Department of English, University of Fribourg, Switzerland: Professor of English Linguistics, 1998-2005 •Department of English, University of Lausanne, Switzerland: Professor of English Language and Linguistics, 1993-98 •Department of Language and Linguistics, University of Essex: Professor of Sociolinguistics (Personal Chair), 1987-92 Reader in Sociolinguistics, 1986-87 •Department of Linguistic Science, University of Reading, UK: Professor (Personal Chair), 1983-86 Reader, 1978-83 Lecturer, 1973-78 Assistant Lecturer, 1970-73 Education and qualifications • BA (MA) in Modern and Mediaeval Languages, King’s College, Cambridge, 1963-66 • Postgraduate Diploma in General Linguistics, University of Edinburgh, 1966- 67 • PhD in Linguistics (Sociolinguistics), University of Edinburgh, 1967-70 • PhD thesis, 1971: The social differentiation of English in Norwich 1 Honours and recognition • Doctorate Honoris Causa, Faculty of Letters, Uppsala University, Sweden, June 2, 1995 • Honorary Doctorate (LittD), University of East Anglia, July 11, 2002. • Honorary Doctorate, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia, November 9th, 2005. • Honorary Doctorate, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, November 30th, 2018. • Honorary Doctorate, University of Patras, Greece, 14th May 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Yod Variation in Australian English
    Yod Variation in Australian English A Sociolinguistic Investigation Ruholla Kazemi Department of English Master’s Degree Project English Linguistics Autumn 2015 Supervisor: Peter Sundkvist Yod Variation in Australian English A Sociolinguistic Investigation Abstract In various post-consonantal environments, the palatal glide /j/ has been subject to variation and change since the late 17th century. Retention, coalescence, and deletion of the glide respectively account for various pronunciations of the word due [dju:], [dʒu:], and [du:] in different dialects of English. Research in this area has often focused on internal motivations. However, the external motivations that regulate the practice of glide variants in the speech of different segments of communities have been a relatively recent area of investigation. Among other dialects, Australian English is one of the major varieties that has not been formally assessed in this area. Hence, the aim of this thesis has been to investigate possible associations between the glide variants and their emergence in the speech of 48 speakers of Australian English. The audio data for this study were 12 tokens pronounced by the speakers in wordlist, sentences, and a story, and were extracted from the AusTalk Corpus (Burnham, Cox et al., 2011). The results for separate analysis of social variables seem to indicate that the spread of different glide variants in the speech of speakers are mainly conditioned by age. The combination of the social variables shows that glide retention is most frequent in the speech of higher educated old individuals. By contrast, glide deletion seems to be almost non-existent in their speech while more frequent in the pronunciations of the young.
    [Show full text]
  • Západočeská Univerzita V Plzni Fakulta Pedagogická Katedra Anglického Jazyka Bakalářská Práce VÝZKUM DIALEKTŮ SPOJEN
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by DSpace at University of West Bohemia Západočeská univerzita v Plzni Fakulta pedagogická Katedra anglického jazyka Bakalářská práce VÝZKUM DIALEKTŮ SPOJENÉHO KRÁLOVSTVÍ Ivan Audes Plzeň 2015 University of West Bohemia Faculty of Education Department of English Undergraduate Thesis DIALECT RESEARCH OF THE UNITED KINGDOM Ivan Audes Pilsen 2015 Prohlašuji, že jsem práci vypracoval samostatně s použitím uvedené literatury a zdrojů informací. V Plzni dne 30.6. 2015 ................................................... Ivan Audes ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my boundless gratitude to my supervisor PhDr. Naděžda Stašková, Ph.D. for her patience and guidance. I would also like to thank my beloved family for their support. ABSTRACT Audes, Ivan. University of West Bohemia, 2015. The Dialect Research of United Kingdom. Supervisor: PhDr. Naděžda Stašková Ph.D This bachelor thesis will consist of two parts - theoretical and practical. In the first part I will explore the term dialect itself and provide understandable definition of all the key words and all the derived expressions concerning this term. The main part of the thesis will be examining various dialects and accents used by people who speak English as their mother tongue and covering all the crucial information about them, e.g. typical features of each dialect, sociolinguistic aspect. I will also explore the historical background and development of each dialect and provide detailed study concerning this issue. I will also inspect the cultural aspect and convey the social development. The research will be divided into 4 parts, each part representing individual country, i.e. dialects of England, Wales, Scotland a Northern Ireland.
    [Show full text]
  • Scandinavian Loanwords in English in the 15Th Century
    Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 56s1 (2021): xx–xx doi: 10.2478/stap-2021-0004 THE EAST ANGLIAN DIALECT OF ENGLISH IN THE WORLD PETER TRUDGILL1 ABSTRACT In the 17th century, the English region of East Anglia continued many of the major population centres of the British Isles, not least Norwich, England’s second city at that time. One might therefore predict that East Anglian dialects of English would have played a major role in determining the nature of the new colonial Englishes which were first beginning to emerge during this period. This paper considers some of the phonological and grammatical features of East Anglian English which can be argued to have been influential in this way. Keywords: East Anglia; dialects; colonial English; Caribbean English; American English; Australasian English. 1. Introduction At the time when the English language first left the British Isles and started being transported across the Atlantic, in the 1600s (Trudgill 2017), Norwich was the second largest city in England, Ipswich was the seventh, Great Yarmouth the eighth, Cambridge the tenth, and Colchester the twelfth (Hoskins & Hey 1984). It would therefore not be at all surprising to find that East Anglian English initially played an important role in the formation of the new Colonial Englishes which were soon to start developing in the Americas, and then subsequently in the Southern Hemisphere. In this paper in honour of Jacek Fisiak, who was a dedicated student of the older dialects of East Anglia, I examine some of the evidence that this was so, investigating both phonological and grammatical features. 1 University of Fribourg.
    [Show full text]
  • Stable Variation in Apparent Time: Coronal Stop Deletion in East Anglian English
    University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics Volume 26 Issue 2 Selected Papers from New Ways of Article 7 Analyzing Variation (NWAV 48) 2020 Stable Variation in Apparent Time: Coronal Stop Deletion in East Anglian English Carmen Ciancia University of Essex Peter L. Patrick University of Essex Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl Recommended Citation Ciancia, Carmen and Patrick, Peter L. (2020) "Stable Variation in Apparent Time: Coronal Stop Deletion in East Anglian English," University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics: Vol. 26 : Iss. 2 , Article 7. Available at: https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol26/iss2/7 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol26/iss2/7 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Stable Variation in Apparent Time: Coronal Stop Deletion in East Anglian English Abstract The linguistic variable (t,d) – word-final /t,d/ deletion in consonant clusters C(C)T/C(C)D – is widely investigated in US dialects (e.g. Guy 1980, Patrick 1991). Conversely, little research on this phonological variable has been carried out in the UK, where (t,d) was mainly researched in Northern varieties of British English, as in York (Tagliamonte and Temple 2005), Manchester (Baranowski and Turton 2020) and in Tyneside English (Woolford 2018). Conflicting esultsr were found with respect to the morphological effect among British English varieties: in York, morphological class failed to reach statistical significance, whereas findings from Manchester and Tyneside exhibit the usual robust morphological effect. This paper investigates (t,d) deletion in the South East of England and sets out to (a) shed light on the unsolved problem of morphological effect in British English; (b) propose a more fine-grained analysis of the following phonetic segment.
    [Show full text]
  • Revista Alicantina De Estudios Ingleses 21
    Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 24(2011):73-129 After at Least 138 Years of Discussion, the Etymological Puzzle is Possibly Solved: The Originally British English informalism kibosh as in “put the kibosh on [something]” could Come from the Clogmakers’ Term kybosh ‘iron bar which, when hot, is used to soften and smooth leather’ (with Possible Reinforcement from Western Ashkenazic British English khay bash ‘eighteen pence’) David L. Gold New York ABSTRACT The sources suggested for the originally British and variously spelled English slang idiom put the kibosh on [...] are so diverse — ranging, for example, from Irish and Scots Gaelic to Yiddish and Hebrew, not to mention English — that no one person could possess enough knowledge to evaluate all of them competently and to answer all the questions that must be answered before we could say “case closed”. For that reason, the author of the present article treads here, as his wont is, only where he feels sure of foot. Philologists who chase A panting syllable through time and space, Start it at home, and hunt it in the dark, To Gaul, to Greece, and into Noah’s Ark (William Cowper, Retirement, 1782) The real work of critical inquiry is to examine what we think we know in order to learn about what we do not know. We must question our givens and opinions. For it is far easier to label than to understand, and intellectual laziness undermines our studies with the deadly inversion of the scientific method: ‘I’ll believe it when I see it!’ becomes ‘I’ll see it when I believe it!’ (Homerin 2003: 6) 74 Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses Introduction When Samuel Johnson was taken to task for criticizing William Shakespeare, he said, “We must confess the faults of our favourite, to gain credit to our praise of his excellencies.
    [Show full text]
  • New Cambridge History of the English Language
    New Cambridge History of the English Language Volume IV: Varieties of English in Britain, Ireland and Europe Editor: Raymond Hickey (also general editor) Introduction: Language Variation and Change 1. Sociolinguistic sources of change (Devyani Sharma) 2. Life-span changes and the history of English (Isabelle Buchstaller) 3. Vernaculars, supraregional varieties and standards (Raymond Hickey) 4. Historical divisions and perceptual dialectology (Chris Montgomery) English in England 5. Dialects, dialectology and the history of English (Warren Maguire) 6. The history of Received Pronunciation (Anne Fabricius) 7. Early London English (Laura Wright) 8. The recent history of London English (Susan Fox) 9. English in the South-West of England (Juhani Klemola) 10. English in East Anglia (David Britain and Rob Potter) 11. English in the Midlands (Esther Asprey and Natalie Braber) 12. English in Merseyside (Kevin Watson) 13. English in Tyneside (Adam Mearns) English in Wales 14. The history of English in Wales (Robert Penhallurick) English in Scotland 15. The history of Scots (Joanna KopacZyk) 16. The lexicography of Scots (Margaret Scott) 17. Taking stock of Scots and Scottish English in the early twenty-first century (Jane Stuart-Smith and Rachel Macdonald) 18. English in Orkney and Shetland (Peter Sundkvist) English in Ireland NewCHEL Vol. 4: Varieties of English in Britain, Ireland and Europe Page 2 of 61 19. English in the south of Ireland (Raymond Hickey) 20. English in the north of Ireland (Kevin McCafferty) English in Europe 21. English in the Channel Islands (Heinrich Ramisch) 22. English in Gibraltar (Elena Seoane and Cristina SuáreZ-Gómez) 23. English in Malta (Alexandra Vella) 24.
    [Show full text]
  • I English Language
    I Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ywes/article-abstract/98/1/1/5481903 by Vienna University Library user on 07 January 2020 English Language VIKTORIJA KOSTADINOVA, NURIA YA´ N˜EZ-BOUZA, GEA DRESCHLER, SUNE GREGERSEN, BEA´ TA GYURIS, KATHRYN ALLAN, MAGGIE SCOTT, LIESELOTTE ANDERWALD, SVEN LEUCKERT, TIHANA KRASˇ, ALESSIA COGO, TIAN GAN, IDA PARISE, SHAWNEA SUM POK TING, JULIANA SOUZA DA SILVA, BEKE HANSEN, AND JESSICA NORLEDGE This chapter has fourteen sections: 1. General; 2. History of English Linguistics; 3. Phonetics and Phonology (not covered this year); 4. Morphology; 5. Syntax; 6. Semantics; 7. Lexicography, Lexicology, and Lexical Semantics; 8. Onomastics; 9. Dialectology and Sociolinguistics; 10. New Englishes and Creolistics; 11. Second Language Acquisition. 12. English as a Lingua Franca; 13. Pragmatics and Discourse. 14. Stylistics. Section 1 is by Viktorija Kostadinova; section 2 is by Nuria Ya´ n˜ez-Bouza; sections 4 and 5 are by Gea Dreschler and Sune Gregersen; section 6 is by Bea´ ta Gyuris; section 7 is by Kathryn Allan; section 8 is by Maggie Scott; section 9 is by Lieselotte Anderwald; section 10 is by Sven Leuckert; section 11 is by Tihana Krasˇ; section 12 is by Tian Gan, Ida Parise, Sum Pok Ting, Juliana Souza da Silva and Alessia Cogo; section 13 is by Beke Hansen; section 14 is by Jessica Norledge. 1. General This section contains books with a general relevance to English linguistics. It first covers a number of publications on historical linguistics, starting with a five-volume series on the history of English, followed by books on historical linguistics.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern English Type of Pronunciation”
    MINISTRY OF HIGHER AND SECONDARY SPECIAL EDUCATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN ANDIZHAN STATE UNIVERSITY THE DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH PHONETICS AND LEXICOLOGY EXTRACT ON THE THEME: “Features of the Northern English type of pronunciation” Done by Akbarova D group 409 Supervisor: Djumaboeva M Introduction “The main objective of all our reforms in the field of economic policy is the individual. Therefore the task of education, the task of raising up a new generation capable of notional renaissance will remain the prerogative of the state and constitute a priority”. From the President I. A. Karimov In the century of globalization and increasing competition, in which we live now, only as a result of persistent and determined progression ahead on the way of cardinal reforms and modernization we can achieve the perspective goal, which we have set before ourselves, i.e. to join the ranks of developed democratic and flourishing states, provide our people worthy living standards. An important question for every society—and most particularly for emerging as well as established democracies—is how to educate the young so that they become competent, responsible, and knowledgeable citizens. That is a challenge of overriding importance. Not only does the quality of life in a democracy depend upon how well that challenge is met. So, too, does the stability—indeed, the endurance of democracy itself is contingent on the competence, commitment, and caring of its citizens. An infant may be born a citizen in the eyes of the law, but transforming a human being into a citizen who can participate effectively and responsibly in a democratic society is a lengthy and demanding task.
    [Show full text]