DOCSLIB.ORG

Autonomous Vehicles: a Generic Perspective

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Autonomous Vehicles: a Generic Perspective International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 07 Issue: 04 | Apr 2020 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 Autonomous Vehicles: A Generic Perspective Parvati Hotagi1, Soumya A2 1Student, Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering, RV College of Engineering, Bengaluru 2Associate Professor, Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering, RV College of Engineering, Bengaluru -------------------------------------------------------------------***---------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract Advancement of driverless technology has given rise for several opportunities in smart urban mobility. In the design of an Autonomous Vehicle, it requires the creation of a system which permits the vehicle to move from source to predefined destination and to escape the obstacles during the journey using the information obtained from sensors that are installed upon the vehicle. The paper seeks to describe where and what might be the effect on broader adoption and what likely needs to be achieved to achieve the expected outcomes of smart urban mobility. The study sheds light on technical development, side effects arising from this progress, strategies to resolve the side effects, and potential literature gaps. Keywords: Autonomous Vehicles (AVs), Semi-Autonomous, Vehicle to Vehicle(V2V), Vehicle to Infrastructure(V2I) 1.0 Introduction A self-driving car (also called a self-sufficient car or a driverless vehicle) is a vehicle that uses a combination of sensors, cameras, radar and computerized logic (man-made intelligence) to move from one target to another without a controller. To classify as completely self-governing, a vehicle must have the option of following a preordained target over streets that have not been modified for its usage without human intercession. Organizations that build and evaluate autonomous vehicles include Toyota, Honda, Google, General Engines, Tesla, Volkswagen and Volvo. Google's project involved an armada of self- driving cars – including Toyota Prii and an Audi TT navigating more than 140,000 miles of roads and interstates across California. Man-made intelligence advancements power self-driving vehicle frameworks. Designers of self-driving vehicles utilize tremendous measures of information from picture acknowledgment frameworks, alongside AI and neural systems, to manufacture frameworks that can drive self-governing. The neural networks recognize patterns in the information, which is taken care of by the AI calculations. That information remembers pictures from cameras for self-driving vehicles from which the neural system figures out how to recognize traffic lights, trees, controls, pedestrians, road signs and other different objects. 2.0 Literature Survey According to Marlon G. Boarnet [1], a specialist in transportation and urban growth at the University of Southern California Approximately every two generations, we rebuild the transportation infrastructure in our cities in ways that shape the vitality of neighborhoods; the settlement patterns in our cities and countryside; and our economy, society and culture and as many believe, autonomous driving cars are this new big change everyone is talking about. Leading not only to high impact environmental benefits such as the improvement of fuel economy through the optimization of highways , the reduction of required cars to only 15% of the current amount needed[2]. In addition to these platoon driving that would save 20-30% fuel consumption[3].This practice also leads to societal aspects such as immense productivity gains while commuting, decline on the accident and death tolls considered as the eight highest death cause worldwide in 2013, stress reduction , and the decline of parking space to up to of the current capacity [4]. It would also, according to a study by Morgan Stanley (2013) lead to an average 38 hours reduction of commuting time per individual per year as well as saving the US economy alone 1.3 trillion dollars per year, creating a shift on the possibilities and different applications, developing completely new markets, partnerships and possible business models[5]. © 2020, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 5267 International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 07 Issue: 04 | Apr 2020 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 All the benefits of course, and not only to mention the Technological difficulties do not come without a certain amount of challenges, complications and necessary changes in current systems in order to work. By now several States in the US have passed laws permitting autonomous cars testing on their roads [6]. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in the United States (2013) provides an official self-driving car classification dividing into NoAutomation (Level 0), Function-specific Automation (Level 1), Combined Function Automation (Level 2), Limited SelfDriving Automation (Level 3) and Full Self- Driving Automation (Level 4). Europeans have also started modifying the Vienna Convention on Road Traffic and the Geneva Convention on Road Traffic in order to be able to adapt this new technology, but legal issues and doubt still arise as one of the main concerns of discussion [7]. Some of the main issues surrounding the autonomous driving field found throughout the literature and the web are; test and standard set for critical event control, how to deal with the requirement for a driver, ownership and maintenance , civil and criminal liability, corporate manslaughter , insurance, data protection and privacy issues [8]. One of the main concerns for all semi-autonomous features in the literature is that humans are poor monitors of automation meaning that driving performance declines as automation increases, leading to big safety concerns while being out of the loop in case of necessary reaction , a situation that is imminent until the technology is fully automated[9]. Moreover John Leonard [10], a MIT professor, reasons that current technology relies on very accurate prior maps and that keeping maps up to date shouldn’t be underestimated, while his colleague Bryan Reimer, a research scientist in MITs Age Lab, argues that the most inhibiting factors related to Autonomous driving will be factors related to the human experience. Despite the fact that most experiments of full automation with future users have been done in driving simulators, recent studies also point that motion sickness is also higher in self-driving cars[11]. And that passengers that do not drive, experience discomfort at lower acceleration rates than car drivers do, not to mention the fear of technology failure . Further worries derive from the social impact such as the massive job loss, as well as the change of social structures as insurance companies, the health industry and public transport systems [12]. 3.0 Autonomous vehicles 3.1 Autonomous Technology In general, a robotic vehicle system must be considered a "virtual" environment, where all the complex driving tasks may be done by the computerized structure of the vehicle in all driving conditions. As indicated by the Government Robotized Vehicles Strategy of the US Division of Transportation, a vehicle is signified as AV on the off chance that it has levels 3-5 mechanized frameworks[13]. Be that as it may, these degrees of self-sufficiency are not carefully kept up in the writing and any degree of independence is alluded to as self-ruling. All through this paper, the term AV will allude to the levels 3-5 computerized frameworks as it were. Driving requires an assortment of capacities, including confinement, recognition, arranging, control, and the board. Data obtaining is an essential to restriction, and discernment. On the off chance that these capacities, including data procurement, are accessible in a vehicle, it could be named as an AV. On the off chance that any AV needs to speak with different frameworks to gather data, or to arrange its moves, it is named as associated self-ruling vehicle , and when any physically determined vehicle, regardless of whether manual or computerized, needs to speak with different foundations to gather data, or to arrange its moves, it is named as associated vehicle[14] . Along these lines, connected vehicles innovation is complimentary or has synergistic impact on the execution of AV somewhat, however availability is definitely not a required element of AVs. 3.2 Benefits Identified AVs are relied upon to be operational both as private and as business vehicles. One of the apparent points of interest and adaptability of independent private vehicles over the regular private vehicle is that it can at the same time be utilized among all individuals in a family. Business AVs could be worked as taxi, transport, and cargo administrations. AV cabs can offer support as a mix of regular vehicle sharing and taxi administrations, which is alluded to as shared AV (SAV) or driverless taxi. Discernment wins that driverless taxi is probably going to supplement customary open travel administration, and it can © 2020, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 5268 International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 07 Issue: 04 | Apr 2020 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 conceivably supplant the private vehicle and ordinary taxicabs in light of the fact that SAVs are relied upon to be generally economical and encourage open doors for performing various tasks during a ride.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2016 Board of Directors Contents
    EFFECTIVE FIRST DAY OF THE MONTH UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED January 2016 BOARD OF DIRECTORS CONTENTS BOARD OF DIRECTORS | December 4-5, 2015 BOARD OF DIRECTORS 1 SOLO 28 The SCCA National Board of Directors met in Kansas City, Friday, December 4 and SEB Minutes 28 December 5, 2015. Area Directors participating were: John Walsh, Chairman, Dan Helman, Vice-Chairman, Todd Butler, Secretary; Bill Kephart, Treasurer; Dick Patullo, CLUB RACING 32 Lee Hill, Steve Harris, Bruce Lindstrand, Terry Hanushek, Tere Pulliam, Peter Zekert, CRB Minutes 32 Brian McCarthy and KJ Christopher and newly elected directors Arnold Coleman, Bob Technical Bulletin 41 Dowie and Jim Weidenbaum. Court of Appeals 52 Divisional Time Trials Comm. 53 The following SCCA, Inc. staff participated in the meeting: Lisa Noble, President RALLY 54 and CEO; Eric Prill, Chief Operations Officer; Mindi Pfannenstiel, Senior Director of RallyCross 54 Finance and Aimee Thoennes, Executive Assistant. Road Rally 56 Guests attending the meeting were Jim Wheeler, Chairman of the CRB. LINKS 57 The secretary acknowledges that these minutes may not appear in chronological order and that all participants were not present for the entire meeting. The meeting was called to order by Vice Chair Helman. Executive Team Report and Staff Action Items President Noble provided a review of 2015 key programs and deliverables with topic areas of core program growth, scca.com, and partnerships. Current initiatives to streamline event process with e-logbook tied into event registration, modernize timing systems in Pro Solo, connecting experiential programs (eg TNIA, Starting Line) to core programs. Multiple program offerings to enhance weekend events.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Autocross Entry Form
    2021 AUTOCROSS / OPEN TRACK ENTRY FORM RMMR AX Event Classifications Stock Classes (ES, ESL, FS, FSL, LS, LSL): Mustang as produced with options available year of manufacture. One modification allowed over stock to suspension or gear ratio. Suspension must retain original configuration and ride height. Up to two modifications allowed to engine over stock. No power adders (eco boost excepted). No autocross or road race tires with wear indicators of less than 200 allowed. Allowed modifications are as follows: Suspension – higher rate springs, sway bars, wheels, and traction bars. One modification only. Shock absorbers are not considered a modification. No modification is allowed that does not adhere to the original suspension design and mounting points. Devices that allow for suspension alignment tuning are allowed. Upgraded brake system and steering systems that were not available for the model year are not allowed. Gear ratio – any gear ratio that was available during the model years covered by the class. Engine - intake manifold, carburetor, throttle body, air cleaner, exhaust headers, and chip upgrade. Two modifications only. Transmission – Transmission swaps/replacements are allowed only for transmissions that were available during the model year covered by the class. Street Prepared Classes (ESP, ESPL, FSP, FSPL, LSP, LSPL): Additional modifications allowed over stock. Car must be titled, have current license plates, be street driven. No major lightening is allowed. Car must have a full interior. The following models due to their superiority over the standard offerings of their model year are considered as Street Prepared cars:’93-’01 Cobra (non supercharged), Bullitt, ’03 –‘04 Mach1, 2012-13 Boss 302, 2011 - 2021 GT,’06 – ’21 Shelby GT/GTH/GT350 (non supercharged), and other non supercharged Shelby, Roush & Saleen models and all electric power vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting the Compcars Dataset for Hierarchical Car Classification
    sensors Article Revisiting the CompCars Dataset for Hierarchical Car Classification: New Annotations, Experiments, and Results Marco Buzzelli * and Luca Segantin Department of Informatics Systems and Communication, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milano, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: We address the task of classifying car images at multiple levels of detail, ranging from the top-level car type, down to the specific car make, model, and year. We analyze existing datasets for car classification, and identify the CompCars as an excellent starting point for our task. We show that convolutional neural networks achieve an accuracy above 90% on the finest-level classification task. This high performance, however, is scarcely representative of real-world situations, as it is evaluated on a biased training/test split. In this work, we revisit the CompCars dataset by first defining a new training/test split, which better represents real-world scenarios by setting a more realistic baseline at 61% accuracy on the new test set. We also propagate the existing (but limited) type-level annotation to the entire dataset, and we finally provide a car-tight bounding box for each image, automatically defined through an ad hoc car detector. To evaluate this revisited dataset, we design and implement three different approaches to car classification, two of which exploit the hierarchical nature of car annotations. Our experiments show that higher-level classification in terms of car type positively impacts classification at a finer grain, now reaching 70% accuracy. The achieved performance constitutes a baseline benchmark for future research, and our enriched set of annotations is made available for public download.
    [Show full text]
  • PT & TT Car Classification Form
    ® NASA Performance Touring (PTD-PTF) & Time Trial (TTD-TTF) Car Classification Form--2018 (v13.1/15.1—1-15-18) Driver or Team Name________________________________ Date______________ Car Number________ Region_____________ e-mail________________________________________ Car Color_______________ If a team, list drivers’ names (two maximum per team): ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ Vehicle: Year_______ Make______________ Model___________________ Special Edition?____________ NASA PT/TT Base Class _____________ Base Weight Listing (from PT/TT Rules)______________lbs. Minimum Competition Weight (w/driver)_______________lbs. Multiple ECU Maps? Describe switching method and HP levels:_____________________________________________ DYNO RE-CLASSED VEHICLES Only: (Only complete this section if the vehicle has been Dyno Re-classed by the National PT/TT Director!) New PT/TT Base Class Assigned by the National PT/TT Director:_________(Attach a copy of the re-classing e-mail) Maximum allowed Peak whp_________hp Minimum Competition Weight__________lbs. All cars with a Motor Swap, Aftermarket Forced Induction, Modified Turbo/Supercharger, Aftermarket Head(s), Increased Number of Camshafts, Hybrid Engine, and Ported Rotary motors MUST be assessed by the National PT/TT Director for re-classification into a new PT/TT Base Class! (See PT Rules sections 6.3.C and 6.4) (E-mail the information in the listed format in PT Rules section 6.4.2 to the National PT/TT Director at [email protected] to receive your new PT/TT Base Class) Note: Any car exceeding the Adjusted Weight/Horsepower Ratio limit for its class will be disqualified. (see PT Rules Section 6.1.2 and Appendix A of PT Rules). Proceed to calculate your vehicle’s Modification Points assessment for up-classing purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Driving Resistances of Light-Duty Vehicles in Europe
    WHITE PAPER DECEMBER 2016 DRIVING RESISTANCES OF LIGHT- DUTY VEHICLES IN EUROPE: PRESENT SITUATION, TRENDS, AND SCENARIOS FOR 2025 Jörg Kühlwein www.theicct.org [email protected] BEIJING | BERLIN | BRUSSELS | SAN FRANCISCO | WASHINGTON International Council on Clean Transportation Europe Neue Promenade 6, 10178 Berlin +49 (30) 847129-102 [email protected] | www.theicct.org | @TheICCT © 2016 International Council on Clean Transportation TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive summary ...................................................................................................................II Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................... IV 1. Introduction ...........................................................................................................................1 1.1 Physical principles of the driving resistances ....................................................................... 2 1.2 Coastdown runs – differences between EU and U.S. ........................................................ 5 1.3 Sensitivities of driving resistance variations on CO2 emissions ..................................... 6 1.4 Vehicle segments ............................................................................................................................. 8 2. Evaluated data sets ..............................................................................................................9 2.1 ICCT internal database .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • From Porsche Club of America--Golden Gate Region Date: December 4, 2007 2:39:13 PM PST To: [email protected] Reply-To: [email protected]
    From: John Celona <[email protected]> Subject: From Porsche Club of America--Golden Gate Region Date: December 4, 2007 2:39:13 PM PST To: [email protected] Reply-To: [email protected] Porsche Club of America Golden Gate Region December, 2007 - Vol 47, Number 12 In This Issue Dear Porsche Enthusiast, Place dé Leglise Welcome to The Nugget, the email newsletter of the Golden Letter from the Editor Gate Region, Porsche Club of America. Competition Corner If you have any trouble viewing Membership Report this email, you can click here to go to the archive of PDF Board of Directors versions of this newsletter. For AX #10 comments or feedback, click here to email the editor. The Power Chef Thanks for reading. 40 Years Ago in the Nugget Registration for DE #6 Year End GGR Banquet Zone 7 Awards Dinner Crab 34 European Porsche Parade 2008 LA Lit & Toy Show Porsche Web Cinema Porsche Hybrid History Quick Links Event Calendar Classified Ads Join PCA Now Nugget Archive More About Us Zone 7 web site PCA web site Great Links Place dé Leglise --by Claude Leglise, GGR President The State of GGR There are only two events left on the GGR calendar for this year. Driver's Ed at Laguna Seca on December 9 - there are still slots available and the weather is holding up very nicely - and the Friday Night Social on December 21. The club has enjoyed a good year in 2007, yet some challenges face us. Andrew Forrest and the entire Time Trial crew have done a terrific job modernizing and revitalizing the TT Series.
    [Show full text]
  • ACRISS Car Classification System
    4WS 968 Car Industry Letter 6/12/06 09:15 Page 1 ACRISS Car Classification System Category Type Trans/Drive Fuel/Air M Mini B 2-3 Door M Manual Unspecified Drive R Unspecified Fuel/Power With Air N Mini Elite C 2/4 Door N Manual 4WD N Unspecified Fuel/Power Without Air E Economy D 4-5 Door C Manual AWD D Diesel Air Standard codes for H Economy Elite W Wagon/Estate A Auto Unspecified Drive Q Diesel No Air Standard codes for all rental companies all rental companies C Compact V PassengerVan* B Auto 4WD H Hybrid Air D Compact Elite L Limousine D Auto AWD I Hybrid No Air I Intermediate S Sport E Electric Air J Intermediate Elite T Convertible C Electric No Air S Standard F SUV* L LPG/Compressed Gas Air R Standard Elite J Open Air All Terrain S LPG/Compressed Gas No Air F Fullsize X Special A Hydrogen Air G Fullsize Elite P Pick up Regular Cab B Hydrogen No Air Increased Categories New Elite Categories P Premium Q Pick up Extended Cab M Multi Fuel/Power Air U Premium Elite Z Special Offer Car F Multi Fuel/Power No Air L Luxury E Coupe V Petrol Air W Luxury Elite M Monospace Z Petrol No Air O Oversize R Recreational Vehicle U Ethanol Air X Special H Motor Home X Ethanol No Air Y 2 Wheel Vehicle N Roadster Increased Greater selection customer service G Crossover* of car types K Commercial Van/Truck *These vehicle types require new booking codes which are listed in the chart on the back of this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Car Model Classification Through Vehicle Keypoint Localization
    Improving Car Model Classification through Vehicle Keypoint Localization Alessandro Simoni2 a, Andrea D’Eusanio1 b, Stefano Pini2 c, Guido Borghi3 d and Roberto Vezzani1;2 e 1Artificial Intelligence Research and Innovation Center, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41125 Modena, Italy 2Department of Engineering “Enzo Ferrari”, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41125 Modena, Italy 3Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy Keywords: Car Model Classification, Vehicle Keypoint Localization, Multi-task Learning. Abstract: In this paper, we present a novel multi-task framework which aims to improve the performance of car model classification leveraging visual features and pose information extracted from single RGB images. In particular, we merge the visual features obtained through an image classification network and the features computed by a model able to predict the pose in terms of 2D car keypoints. We show how this approach considerably improves the performance on the model classification task testing our framework on a subset of the Pascal3D+ dataset containing the car classes. Finally, we conduct an ablation study to demonstrate the performance improvement obtained with respect to a single visual classifier network. 1 INTRODUCTION Only recently, some works in the literature have faced the classification problem trying to distinguish The classification of vehicles, and specifically car between vehicle macro-classes, such as aeroplane, models, is a crucial task in many real world applica- car and bicycle. For instance, in (Afifi et al., 2018) tions and especially in the automotive scenario, where a multi-task CNN architecture that performs vehi- controlling and managing the traffic can be quite com- cle classification and viewpoint estimation simultane- plex.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Fuel Economy Technologies for Light-Duty Vehicles
    This PDF is available from The National Academies Press at http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12924 Assessment of Fuel Economy Technologies for Light-Duty Vehicles ISBN Committee on the Assessment of Technologies for Improving Light-Duty 978-0-309-15607-3 Vehicle Fuel Economy; National Research Council 260 pages 8 1/2 x 11 PAPERBACK (2011) Visit the National Academies Press online and register for... Instant access to free PDF downloads of titles from the NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL 10% off print titles Custom notification of new releases in your field of interest Special offers and discounts Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the National Academies Press. Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Request reprint permission for this book Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Assessment of Fuel Economy Technologies for Light-Duty Vehicles ASSESSMENT OF FUEL ECONOMY TECHNOLOGIES FOR LIGHT-DUTY VEHICLES Committee on the Assessment of Technologies for Improving Light-Duty Vehicle Fuel Economy Board on Energy and Environmental Systems Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Assessment of Fuel Economy Technologies for Light-Duty Vehicles THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 GCR General Competition Rules
    General Competition Rules for 2017 Effective January 1, 2017 (Including approved/ratified changes) These General Competition Rules (GCRs) have been compiled by the Competition Director and Competition Committee of the Porsche Owners Club (POC) and represent a simplified but strict adherence to the competitive spirit and sportsmanship of the POC. Approved and ratified by the POC Board of Directors, these GCRs are to be used by all competitors in POC Performance Driving Series (PDS), Time Attack, and Racing events as a template for car preparation and modification within these rules. Important note: The rules and/or regulations set forth herein are designed to provide for the orderly conduct of POC events and to establish minimum acceptable requirements for such events. These GCRs shall govern the condition of the POC events, and, by participating in these events, all participants are deemed to have complied with these GCRs. No expressed or implied warranty of safety shall result from publication of, or compliance with, these GCRs. They are solely intended as a guide for the conduct of the sport, and are in no way a guarantee against injury or death to participants, spectators, or others. Above all, the POC wishes to promote fair and enjoyable competition for all its members. Questions concerning these rules should be directed to the POC Competition Director via the official POC website: www.porscheclub.com 1 Published by and all rights reserved by the Porsche Owners Club, Inc., a not for profit organization. TABLE OF CONTENTS General 1.0
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Hpde Gs101 Tech Inspection Form
    2021 TECH INSPECTION FORM – GS101 School Prior to bringing your car to the track inspect each item on the car as noted on this Tech Sheet. Consult a tech inspector if there are any questions. Please check each item on this list and bring to track with the car Year ________ Model ______________________________ Engine size_______Supercharged ___ Factory_______Aftermarket_____ Modifications__________________________________________________ Tire Manufacturer: __________Size: ________Model Name _________and Treadwear Rating___________ Your Car Classification: circle one - Stock - Modified - Race • A full-size, street legal windshield. No cracks. Must be clean. • Remove hub caps / trim rings / non-bolted wheel covers • Targa or T-top vehicles must either bolt the removable panels in place or removed entirely. • Car Number on each side of Car visible to Corner Workers – Track can provide. • Open cars must run with the top lowered and safely stowed. Weather Permitting • Brake fluid -Less than 6 months old, reservoir full. (Fluid should be light in color) • Brake Hoses and Lines -Dry and in good condition • Brake Pads - 1/4" thickness or greater. New pads recommended. • Brake Pedal -Must be firm and release freely. • Brake Lights - Fully functioning • Battery - Securely fastened and good condition, no leaks corrosion or exposed • Terminals. Be sure Positive Terminal is covered and protected • Engine and Transmission -No fluid leaks. • Reliable throttle return springs, no binding, returns freely. • Exhaust -Securely mounted. • Front Suspension -No looseness permitted. Bearings and joints in excellent condition. • Rear Suspension - Drive train & components in excellent condition. Suspensions secure. • Wheels - No cracks or bends. Lug nuts torque checked after each session. No hubcaps. • Tires - Good condition. No cracks, bulges, flat spot or cord.
    [Show full text]
  • Car Classification Worksheet Please Fill This out and Bring It to the Event
    Car Classification Worksheet Please fill this out and bring it to the event Modification Description Yes Stock STS STX SP SM (Did you do the following to your car?) or No Legal Legal Legal Legal Legal Changed Rim Diameter? No Yes Yes Yes Yes Tires Wider than 225? n/a No No Yes Yes Tire Treadwear Rating of 140 or less? n/a No No n/a n/a R Compound Tires (eg: Hoosier, Kuhmo V700, A032R)? Yes No No Yes Yes How Wide Are Your Wheels? Stock 7.5" 8.0" n/a n/a Changed Front Sway Bar? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Changed Rear Sway Bar? No Yes Yes Yes Yes Changed Spring Rates? No Yes Yes Yes Yes Installed Camber Plates? No Yes Yes Yes Yes Installed Front or Rear Shock Tower Brace? No Yes Yes Yes Yes Installed Shocks With Adjustable Valving? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Replaced Struts with Coil-Over Suspension? No Yes Yes Yes Yes Changed Sway Bar Bushing Material? F Only Yes Yes Yes Yes Changed Suspension Bushing Material or Offset? No Yes Yes Yes Yes Added Track Bar or Panhard Bar? No Yes Yes Yes Yes Did You Lower Your Car? No Yes Yes Yes Yes Changed Diameter of Brake Rotors? No No Yes Yes Yes Installed Drilled or Slotted Brake Rotors? No Yes Yes No Yes Installed Other than Stock Proportioning Valve? No No No Yes Yes All Engine Changes Must be Emissions Legal? Yes Yes Yes No No Changed ECU Software, Chip or VTEC Controller? No Yes Yes Yes Yes Changed Boost Controls or Levels? No No No No Yes Changed Air Filter Element In Stock Airbox? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Changed Air Filter Enclosure (eg: Installed a Cone Filter)? No Yes Yes Yes Yes Installed Larger Throttle Body?
    [Show full text]