DOCSLIB.ORG

A Sia Po Lic Y

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

the national bureau of asian research 19 asia policy a s i a p january 2015 o 19 l roundtable i Asia’s Multipolar Nuclear Future c Christopher P. Twomey, Rajesh Basrur, Benjamin Schreer, y Noboru Yamaguchi, Kang Choi, P.K. Singh, Aaron L. Friedberg january 2015 january essays and articles The Development of Japanese Security Policy Bhubhindar Singh Russia’s Asia Pivot Jeffrey Mankoff Indian Foreign Policy Responds to the U.S. Pivot Harsh V. Pant and Yogesh Joshi South Korea’s Search for Nuclear Sovereignty Toby Dalton and Alexandra Francis the national bureau of asian research 1414 nethe 42nd national street, bureau suite 300 book review roundtable seattofl asiane, wa researchshington 98105 http://www.nbr.org http://www.asiapolicy.nbr.orghttp://asiapolicy.nbr.org Recent Books on Civil-Military Relations in Pakistan asia policy • http://asiapolicy.nbr.org • a peer-reviewed journal devoted to bridging the gap between academic research and policymaking on issues related to the Asia-Pacific editors C. Christine Fair and Mark W. Frazier editors Georgetown University The New School Jessica Keough managing editor Joshua Ziemkowski copy and style editor Hannah Haegeland, Craig Scanlan, and McKenzie Templeton copyeditors editorial advisory committee C. Christine Fair Bhubhindar Singh Georgetown University S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Mark Frazier Michael Wills The New School The National Bureau of Asian Research editorial board Muthiah Alagappa Mark Katz Kenneth Pyle (co-chairman) Institute of Strategic and George Mason University University of Washington International Studies Malaysia David Lampton Lawrence Reardon Michael Armacost Johns Hopkins University University of New Hampshire Stanford University Nicholas Lardy Robert Ross Richard Bush Peterson Institute for Boston College Brookings Institution International Economics Richard Samuels Steve Chan Chae-Jin Lee Massachusetts Institute University of Colorado, Boulder Claremont McKenna College of Technology Thomas Christensen Steven Lewis Andrew Scobell Princeton University Rice University RAND Corporation Eliot Cohen Cheng Li David Shambaugh Johns Hopkins University Brookings Institution George Washington University Nicholas Eberstadt Kenneth Lieberthal Susan Shirk American Enterprise Institute Brookings Institution University of California, San Diego Elizabeth Economy Kimberly Marten Council on Foreign Relations Barnard College Sheldon Simon Arizona State University Richard Ellings (co-chairman) Barrett McCormick The National Bureau of Marquette University Robert Sutter Asian Research George Washington University Rajan Menon Aaron Friedberg City College of New York, Richard Suttmeier Princeton University City University of New York University of Oregon Paul Godwin Vali Nasr Michael Swaine National War College (ret.) Johns Hopkins University Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Michael Green Marcus Noland Center for Strategic and Peterson Institute for See Seng Tan International Studies International Economics S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Stephen Hanson Margaret Pearson College of William and Mary University of Maryland Ashley Tellis Carnegie Endowment for Harry Harding Minxin Pei International Peace University of Virginia Claremont McKenna College Robert Wade Robert Hefner T.J. Pempel London School of Economics Boston University University of California, Berkeley and Political Science David Kang Dwight Perkins Vincent Wang University of Southern California Harvard University University of Richmond asia policy number 19 • january 2015 Contents u roundtable u Approaching Critical Mass: Asia’s Multipolar Nuclear Future introduction: dangerous dynamism in asia’s nuclear future . 2 Christopher P. Twomey nuclear stability and polarity in post–cold war asia . 5 Rajesh Basrur china’s development of a more secure nuclear second-strike capability: implications for chinese behavior and u .s . extended deterrence . 14 Benjamin Schreer the utility of nuclear and conventional forces in the second nuclear age: a japanese military perspective . 21 Noboru Yamaguchi the north korean nuclear problem: twenty years of crisis . 28 Kang Choi the india-pakistan nuclear dyad and regional nuclear dynamics . 37 P.K. Singh the evolving nuclear order: implications for proliferation, arms racing, and stability . 45 Aaron L. Friedberg u special essay u the development of japanese security policy: a long-term defensive strategy . 49 Bhubhindar Singh This essay examines the developments in Japanese security policy that have been undertaken by the Abe government since December 2012. u articles u russia’s asia pivot: confrontation or cooperation? . 65 Jeffrey Mankoff This article examines the origins and conduct of Russia’s Asia pivot, analyzes the role Asia plays in Russia’s economic development plans, and assesses Russia’s efforts to balance its strategic partnership with China and its ambitions to be a more autonomous player in Asia. indian foreign policy responds to the u .s . pivot . 89 Harsh V. Pant and Yogesh Joshi This article examines India’s foreign policy response to the U.S. pivot toward Asia and investigates New Delhi’s strategy for dealing with the changing balance of power in the region. south korea’s search for nuclear sovereignty . 115 Toby Dalton and Alexandra Francis This article argues that the narrow technical disagreements stalling the renegotiation of the U.S.–South Korea nuclear cooperation agreement mask a far larger and more complicated set of issues and interests that challenge both the future of bilateral nuclear cooperation and the nonproliferation regime. u book review roundtable u Recent Books on Civil-Military Relations in Pakistan Aqil Shah’s The Army and Democracy: Military Politics in Pakistan T.V. Paul’s The Warrior State: Pakistan in the Contemporary World C. Christine Fair’s Fighting to the End: The Pakistan Army’s Way of War getting beyond opacity: new light on pakistan’s enigmatic army . 138 John H. Gill the normative underpinnings of pakistan’s military . 143 Marvin G. Weinbaum the military and pakistan’s political and security disposition . 147 Hasan Askari Rizvi the greedy warrior state . .. 152 Aqil Shah culture or structure? understanding the complexities of pakistan . 158 T.V. Paul pakistan’s army: running and ruining a country . 163 C. Christine Fair author’s response: military influence and the reality of politics in pakistan . 168 Aqil Shah author’s response: the paradoxes of pakistan . 173 T.V. Paul author’s response: the united states needs a new policy toward pakistan . 178 C. Christine Fair asia policy • http://asiapolicy .nbr .org • a peer-reviewed journal devoted to bridging the gap between academic research and policymaking on issues related to the Asia-Pacific guidelines for submission Asia Policy is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to bridging the gap between academic research and policymaking on issues related to the Asia-Pacific. The journal publishes peer-reviewed research articles and policy essays, roundtables on policy-relevant topics and recent publications, and book review essays, as well as other occasional formats. I. General Requirements Asia Policy welcomes the submission of policy-relevant research on important issues in the Asia-Pacific. The journal will consider two main types of submissions for peer review: research articles that present new information, theoretical frameworks, or arguments and draw clear policy implications; and policy essays that provide original, persuasive, and rigorous analysis. Authors or editors interested in having a book considered for review should submit a copy of the book to the managing editor at NBR, 1414 NE 42nd Street, Suite 300, Seattle, Washington 98105. Submissions may be sent to <[email protected]>. Asia Policy requires that all submitted manuscripts have not been previously published in any form, either in part or in whole, and are not currently under consideration by any other organization. All prior use of arguments found in the manuscript—whether for publication in English or any other language—must be properly footnoted at the time of submission. The author should also describe the background of the manuscript upon submission of the first draft, including whether the manuscript or any component parts have been presented at conferences or have appeared online. II. Manuscript Format • The manuscript should be in Times New Roman, 12-point font with 1.5-line spacing. Research articles should range from 8,000 to 12,000 words, and policy essays should range from 4,000 to 6,000 words. • In order to be easily accessible to policymakers, each manuscript must include (1) a Title Page, (2) a one-page Executive Summary, and (3) a concise Introduction according to the requirements listed below. 1) The Title Page should include only the article title, author’s name, a list of five keywords, and a short biographical statement (under 50 words) that lists the author’s e-mail address. 2) To help bridge the policy and academic communities, all research published by NBR must include a one-page Executive Summary of approximately 275 words that includes: • a Topic Statement • the Main Argument • the Policy Implications A sample Executive Summary is provided in Section III below. 3) The Introduction of all NBR publications should not exceed two pages in length and should plainly describe: • the specific question that the paper seeks to answer • the policy importance of the question • the main argument/findings of the paper • Tables and figures should be placed at the end of
Recommended publications
  • Russia and the EU in a Multipolar World: Invoking the Global in Russian Terms

    Russia and the EU in a Multipolar World: Invoking the Global in Russian Terms

    Russia and the EU in a Multipolar World: Invoking the Global in Russian Terms Aziz Elmuradov Introduction Over the past decade, Russia’s relations with the European Union have evolved from competition to conflict. With the Ukraine crisis as a culmination point, many scholars explain the conflictual stand-off as a result of a long-term cri- sis rooted in the internal structure of EU–Russia interaction (Casier 2016; Chaban et al. 2017; Haukkala 2015). While such a perspective contributes to a better understanding of the conflict, there is more to the confrontational dynamics between the two sides. World politics can be traced back not only to the pursuit of national interests, but also to differing ways of envision- ing the world. To a considerable extent, the current conflict with Russia is a conflict of worldviews. In line with the theme of this volume, the following chapter takes this epistemic dimension of world politics seriously. The world and the global are not fixed realms but are constituted in the practices ofcon- crete actors who create their discursive horizons of the world and the global through symbolic representations, narratives and models. This chapter, there- fore, focuses on practices of worldmaking inherent in Russian foreign policy discourse. Retracing popular modes of mapping the world from the Russian perspective, I will show how a multipolar worldview informs the relationship between Russia and the Western world. Russian foreign policy discourse is greatly affected by major trends and trajectories under way in world politics. Russia finds itself in an increasingly dynamic global environment. The world is more volatile and uncertain to- day than at any time since the fall of the Berlin Wall.
  • Thomas J. Christensen's CV

    Thomas J. Christensen's CV

    Thomas J. Christensen Professional Positions 2003-present William P. Boswell Professor of World Politics of Peace and War, Princeton University▪ January 2011-present Professor of Politics and International Affairs; Director, China and the World Program Princeton University ▪ July 2003-present Director, Master’s of Public Policy Program, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University ▪ July 2009-present Faculty Director, Truman Scholars Program, Princeton University ▪ July 2011-present Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs, with responsibility for relations with China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Mongolia ▪ July 2006-July 2008 Foreign Affairs Expert (part-time consultant), Secretary’s Policy Planning Staff United States Department of State ▪ July 2008-present Non-Resident Senior Fellow in Foreign Policy, John L. Thornton China Center The Brookings Institution ▪ January 2010-Present Academic Advisory Board, Schwarzman Global Scholars Program, 2013-2016 Education Columbia University (September 1987-February 1993) Ph.D., Political Science, International Relations Area Specialization: Chinese Politics and Foreign Policy ▪ February 1993 Peking University, Beijing, China, Advanced Research Scholar▪ August 1990-January 1991 (Ph.D. Dissertation Research) University of International Business and Economics, Beijing, China, Business Chinese Classes▪ Summer 1987 University of Pennsylvania (September 1985-August 1987) M.A., International Relations ▪ August 1987 Cornell University. FALCON intensive Chinese language class (June-August
  • North Korean Identity As a Challenge to East Asia's Regional Order

    North Korean Identity As a Challenge to East Asia's Regional Order

    Korean Soc Sci J (2017) 44:51–71 North Korean Identity as a Challenge to East Asia’s Regional Order Leif-Eric Easley Received: 9 May 2017 / Accepted: 31 May 2017 / Published online: 9 June 2017 Ⓒ Korean Social Science Research Council 2017 Introduction North Korea presents serious complications for East Asia’s regional order, and yet its identity is subject to frequent oversimplification. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK or North Korea) is often in the headlines for its nuclear weapons and missile programs and for its violations of human rights.1 Media reports typically depict North Korea as an otherworldly hermit kingdom ruled by a highly caricatured Kim regime. This article seeks to deepen the conversation about North Korea’s political characteristics and East Asia’s regional architecture by addressing three related questions. First, how has North Korea challenged the regional order, at times driving some actors apart and others together? How are these trends explained by and reflected in North Korean national identity, as articulated by the Kim regime and as perceived in the region? Finally, what academic and policy-relevant implications are offered by the interaction of North Korean identity and regional order? To start, measuring national identity is a difficult proposition (Abdelal, et al., 2009). Applying the concepts of national identity and nationalism to North Korea are complicated by analytical problems in separating the nation, and especially the state, from the Kim regime. This study chooses to focus on “identity” rather than “nationalism” because “North Korean nationalism” implies a certain ideology that contrasts to the nationalisms of the Republic of Korea (ROK or South Korea), Japan or China.
  • Forecasting China's Future," the National Interest (Fall 1986)

    Forecasting China's Future," the National Interest (Fall 1986)

    FORECASTING CHINA’S FUTURE: EXPERTS AND UNCERTAINTY Roger Irvine Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Centre for Asian Studies School of Social Sciences and Humanities University of Adelaide October 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................ iii ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................ vi DECLARATION ....................................................................................................... vii ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................ viii SPELLING OF CHINESE NAMES ........................................................................... ix ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................... x 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Challenges and Benefits of Forecasting ........................................................ 1 1.2 China Watchers and Forecasting ................................................................... 3 1.3 Dominance and Collapse ............................................................................... 6 1.4 Experts and Uncertainty ................................................................................ 7 1.5 Overview ......................................................................................................
  • The Challenging Future of Strategic Planning in Foreign Policy

    The Challenging Future of Strategic Planning in Foreign Policy

    01-0306-8 ch1.qxd 3/26/09 2:44 PM Page 3 daniel w. drezner 1 The Challenging Future of Strategic Planning in Foreign Policy “Avoid trivia.” —Secretary of State George Marshall’s advice to George Kennan, the first director of policy planning Strategic planning for American foreign policy is dead, dying, or moribund. This, at least, has been the assessment of several commentators and policy- makers in recent years.1 Michèle Flournoy and Shawn Brimley observed in 2006, “For a country that continues to enjoy an unrivaled global position, it is both remarkable and disturbing that the United States has no truly effective strategic planning process for national security.”2 At an academic conference in 2007, a former director of the State Department’s policy planning staff complained that, “six years after 9/11, we still don’t have a grand strategy.” Aaron Friedberg, who was director of policy planning for Vice President Richard Cheney, writes in this volume, “The U.S. government has lost the capacity to conduct serious, sustained national strategic planning.” Admiral William Fallon, the CENTCOM commander until the spring of 2008, told the New York Times that the United States would need to focus more on policy planning: “We need to have a well-thought-out game plan for engagement in the world that we adjust regularly and that has some system of checks and bal- ances built into it.”3 In this volume, Council on Foreign Relations president Richard Haass argues that the United States has “squandered” its post–cold war opportunity, concluding, “Historians will not judge the United States well for how it has used these twenty years.” These sorts of laments have become common in the past decade, in no small part because of the foreign policy planning of the administrations of Bill 3 01-0306-8 ch1.qxd 3/26/09 2:44 PM Page 4 4 The Challenging Future of Strategic Planning Clinton and George W.
  • Treasured Swords: Environment Under the Byungjin Line

    Treasured Swords: Environment Under the Byungjin Line

    TREASURED SWORDS: ENVIRONMENT UNDER THE BYUNGJIN LINE by Robert Winstanley-Chesters Sino-NK Director of Research October 2013 TREASURED SWORDS: ENVIRONMENT UNDER THE BYUNGJIN LINE > A party apparatchik informs workers of the key tenets of the Byungjin line Image: Rodong Sinmun The Byungjin Line, not to mention its accompanying framing in developmental and environmental terms, the “minaturized, lightened, diversified, and precise better to understand the place of Sepho in a North Korea nukes,” is everywhere these days. And with good under this new strategic line. reason: ”Byungjin” surely merits examination and reportage, for it marks a vitally important, even definitive, AMPLIFIED LEGACY: KIM JONG-UN AS HOLISTIC change of emphasis at the dawn of the Kim Jong-un era. ENVIRONMENTALIST? Within this paper I plan to delve deeper into the Before examining the historical context for the historical context for this new strategic line, which will developmental approach in which Sepho sits, a rare support the construction of an analytical framework opportunity has been presented to the analyst which through which the place of the environmental in the new might better lay the ground for this context. The arrival theorization can be determined. It is already clear that on April 27, 2012, of Kim Jong-un’s first published one key aspect of this is the Sepho Grassland reclamation work, “On Effecting a Drastic Turn in Land Management project. Emblematic of a shift in developmental paradigms to Meet the Requirements for Building a Thriving of land reclamation and rehabilitation in North Korea, Socialist Nation,” brought with it the intriguing notion Sepho is essential to the environmental narrative of the that a youthful leader would see land management as byungjinist state.
  • GS Energy Brochure Download

    GS Energy Brochure Download

    Company Introduction COPYRIGHT © 2012 GS ENERRGY. All RIGHTS RESERVED GS Energy Profile p.03 Subsidiaries p.04 Business Portfolio Refining & Petrochemicals p.05 Gas & Power p.07 Exploration & Production p.12 Green Growth p.14 GS Energy R&D Center p.18 Financial Information p.19 Contact Us p.20 History p.21 COPYRIGHT © 2012 GS ENERRGY. All RIGHTS RESERVED Corporate Profile GS Energy was incorporated on January 3, 2012 as a result of GS Holdings’ spinoff of GS Caltex, its refining, marketing, chemicals and transportation arm, creating a new independent Korean energy company. Subsequently, GS Energy assumed the high growth businesses previously operated by GS Caltex including, exploration & production and renewable energy operations. Further, by acquiring GS Caltex’s electric & gas utilities operations, GS Energy has solidified its position as an integrated energy-specialized holding company. Value chain integration and operational agility are fundamental to GS Energy’s long term growth strategy. GS Energy is organized into four interrelated segments: Exploration & Production, Refining & Petrochemicals, Gas & Power and Green Growth. Our integrated business model allows us to capture synergies among our different segments and activities. Our upstream businesses include the development of oil & gas projects across the globe, from the Middle East to the Americas and Southeast Asia. Further downstream, GS Energy is currently constructing a Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) terminal in South Chungcheong Province to optimize value chain integration and to ultimately provide a steady flow of electric power and gas to customers through various subsidiaries and affiliates. Furthermore, given our focus on sustainable growth, we have been actively developing our technical know-how in the alternative energy sector.
  • Self-Study Syllabus on Chinese Foreign Policy

    Self-Study Syllabus on Chinese Foreign Policy

    Self-Study Syllabus on Chinese Foreign Policy www.mandarinsociety.org PrefaceAbout this syllabus with China’s rapid economic policymakers in Washington, Tokyo, Canberra as the scale and scope of China’s current growth, increasing military and other capitals think about responding to involvement in Africa, China’s first overseas power,Along and expanding influence, Chinese the challenge of China’s rising power. military facility in Djibouti, or Beijing’s foreign policy is becoming a more salient establishment of the Asian Infrastructure concern for the United States, its allies This syllabus is organized to build Investment Bank (AIIB). One of the challenges and partners, and other countries in Asia understanding of Chinese foreign policy in that this has created for observers of China’s and around the world. As China’s interests a step-by-step fashion based on one hour foreign policy is that so much is going on become increasingly global, China is of reading five nights a week for four weeks. every day it is no longer possible to find transitioning from a foreign policy that was In total, the key readings add up to roughly one book on Chinese foreign policy that once concerned principally with dealing 800 pages, rarely more than 40–50 pages will provide a clear-eyed assessment of with the superpowers, protecting China’s for a night. We assume no prior knowledge everything that a China analyst should know. regional interests, and positioning China of Chinese foreign policy, only an interest in as a champion of developing countries, to developing a clearer sense of how China is To understanding China’s diplomatic history one with a more varied and global agenda.
  • Beyond Engagement? Rethinking America's China Policy

    Beyond Engagement? Rethinking America's China Policy

    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY CHINA, 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2015.1132962 BOOK REVIEW Beyond Engagement? Rethinking America's China Policy The China Challenge: shaping the choices of a rising power, by Thomas Christensen, New York, W.W. Norton, 2015. The Hundred Year War: China’s secret strategy to replace America as the global superpower, by Michael Pillsbury, New York, Henry Holt & Co, 2015. Strategic Reassurance and Resolve: US China relations in the twenty-first century, by James Steinberg and Michael O’Hanlon, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 2014. Obama and China’s Rise: an insider’s account of America’s Asia strategy, by Jeffery Bader, Washington, DC, Brookings Institution Press, 2012. A Contest for Supremacy: China, America, and the struggle for mastery in Asia, by Aaron Friedberg, New York, W.W. Norton, 2011. Rethinking engagement Since the Nixon Administration, the US strategy towards China has been predicated on the assumption that if the bilateral relationship is properly managed conflict can be avoided. Many Americans across the political spectrum believe that through engagement the US can reduce the chances that China will become aggressive (Bader, Obama and China’s Rise, pp. 146–147). Yet, even as US policymakers have sought to integrate China and use cooperation to shape its choices, Beijing’s increasing bellicosity has raised concerns in Washington and beyond that engagement may not prevent conflict. For five decades, the US has aided China economically, rhetorically and politically with the underly- ing objective to mollify, and if possible, avoid, the rising state’s propensity to pursue revisionism using force.
  • Russia and Asia: the Emerging Security Agenda

    Russia and Asia: the Emerging Security Agenda

    Russia and Asia The Emerging Security Agenda Stockholm International Peace Research Institute SIPRI is an independent international institute for research into problems of peace and conflict, especially those of arms control and disarmament. It was established in 1966 to commemorate Sweden’s 150 years of unbroken peace. The Institute is financed mainly by the Swedish Parliament. The staff and the Governing Board are international. The Institute also has an Advisory Committee as an international consultative body. The Governing Board is not responsible for the views expressed in the publications of the Institute. Governing Board Professor Daniel Tarschys, Chairman (Sweden) Dr Oscar Arias Sánchez (Costa Rica) Dr Willem F. van Eekelen (Netherlands) Sir Marrack Goulding (United Kingdom) Dr Catherine Kelleher (United States) Dr Lothar Rühl (Germany) Professor Ronald G. Sutherland (Canada) Dr Abdullah Toukan (Jordan) The Director Director Dr Adam Daniel Rotfeld (Poland) Stockholm International Peace Research Institute Signalistg. 9, S-1769 70 Solna, Sweden Cable: SIPRI Telephone: 46 8/655 97 00 Telefax: 46 8/655 97 33 E-mail: [email protected] Internet URL: http://www.sipri.se Russia and Asia The Emerging Security Agenda Edited by Gennady Chufrin OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS 1999 OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Athens
  • University of West Bohemia in Pilsen Faculty of Philosophy and Arts

    University of West Bohemia in Pilsen Faculty of Philosophy and Arts

    University of West Bohemia in Pilsen Faculty of Philosophy and Arts Dissertation Thesis Democratic People’s Republic of Korea in International Politics Analysis of the Changes of North Korean Foreign Policy between 1994 and 2015 Using the Role Theoretic Approach Plzeň 2016 Lenka Caisová University of West Bohemia in Pilsen Faculty of Philosophy and Arts Department of Politics and International Relations Study Programme Political Science Field of Study International Relations Dissertation Thesis Democratic People’s Republic of Korea in International Politics Analysis of the Changes of North Korean Foreign Policy between 1994 and 2015 Using the Role Theoretic Approach Lenka Caisová Supervisor: doc. PhDr. Šárka Cabadová-Waisová, Ph.D. Department of Politics and International Relations University of West Bohemia in Pilsen Sworn Statement I hereby claim I made this dissertation thesis (topic: Democratic People’s Republic of Korea in International Politics ; subtopic: Analysis of the Changes of North Korean Foreign Policy between 1994 and 2015 Using the Role Theoretic Approach ) together with enclosed codebook by myself whereas I used the sources as stated in the Bibliography only. In certain parts of this thesis I use extracts of articles I published before. In Chapter 1 and 2, I use selected parts of my article named “ Severní Korea v mezinárodních vztazích: jak uchopovat severokorejskou zahraniční politiku? ” which was published in Acta FF 7, no. 3 in 2014. In Chapter 4, I use my article named “Analysis of the U.S. Foreign Policy towards North Korea: Comparison of the Post-Cold War Presidents” which was published in Acta FF no. 3, 2014 and article named “ Poskytovatelé humanitární a rozvojové pomoci do Korejské lidově demokratické republiky ” published in journal Mezinárodní vztahy 49, no.
  • North Korean Decisionmaking

    North Korean Decisionmaking

    C O R P O R A T I O N JOHN V. PARACHINI, SCOTT W. HAROLD, GIAN GENTILE, DEREK GROSSMAN, LEAH HEEJIN KIM, LOGAN MA, MICHAEL J. MAZARR, LINDA ROBINSON North Korean Decisionmaking Economic Opening, Conventional Deterrence Breakdown, and Nuclear Use For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RRA165-1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0553-1 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2020 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface Discerning the decisionmaking of Kim Jong-Un and the North Korean regime on issues of peaceful engagement and warlike actions endures as a mighty challenge for U.S.