<<

CALANEAL MALUNIONS

 DOLFI HERSCOVICI , JR  TAMPA GENERAL HOSPITAL  TAMPA, FLORIDA

 Disclosure Information:  The author does not have any financial interests or relationships with any of the products discussed during this presentation. All products discussed during this presentation have been approved for human use by the FDA. WHY SHOULD WE FIX CALCANEAL FRACTURES?

 Because we can  We have eqqpuipment we need to use  Saw it done once, thought IIlddi could do it  Pays well and you need the money  Trying to decrease potential future complicat ions ANATOMY OF A FRACTURE

 Force dri ves the lateral process of the talus into lateral wall of calcaneus  Extends medially to sustentaculum anddilllfd medial wall, fracture li ne runs superolateral to inferomedial  Force then exits anteriorly near anterior column or calcaneocuboid joint  Secondary fracture line results from continued impaction of the talus into the calcaneus  Begins at apex of angle of Gissane and exists superior just posterior to post facet or inferior to tuberosityygg creating tongueue--ttype pattern ANATOMY OF A MALUNION

 Tuberosity fragment translates laterally and superiorly  Decreases height  Alters lever arm effect of calcaneus  Flattens talar inclination and talocalcaneal angle  impingement  Increases width  Results in lateral exostosis  >2mm of disppplacement of post facet  Changes loadload--bearingbearing characteristics  Direct cause of subtalar arthrosis WHAT HAPPENS IF WE DON’T FIX THEM?

 Neurologic Problems  Entrapment of the posterior tibial and suralll nerves  Cause: Significant ddspaceisplaceme nt to of medial and lateral fragments WHAT HAPPENS IF WE DON’T FIX THEM?

 Tendon Problems  Impingement, dislocation or entrapment of peroneal tendons  Cause: Displacement of lateral wall entraps or dislocates tendon at fibu la or anter ior to fibula WHAT HAPPENS IF WE DON’T FIX THEM?

Problems  Painful exostoses can produce difficulty with shoe wear  Widened  Loss of height  Hindf oot varus or va lgus  Cause: Malalignment of the hindfoot alters pattern ofhf shoeoe--wearwear andid gait WHAT HAPPENS IF WE DON’T FIX THEM?

 Joint Problems  Painful arthritis of the subtalar and calcaneocu bidjitboid joints  Lateral joint pain with talar tilt  CalcaneoCalcaneo--fibularfibular impingement  Cause: Malunion of the 4 joints WHAT HAPPENS IF WE DON’T FIX THEM?

 Joint Problems  Impingement of the ankle joint  Anterior Impingement secondary to loss of talar height and inclination  Results in decrease in ankle dorsiflexion  Cause: Malunion of the 4 joints RADIOGRAPHIC EVAATOALUATION  Plain Radiographs  Lateral, Broden, Harris views  Saltzman View  Saltzman, el-el-Khoury,Khoury, Ankle Int, 1995

Normal Pathologic RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION

 CT Scan  Most reliable tool to evalliluate malunions  22--DD with sagittal and coronal cuts Sagittal  33--DD helpful for prepre-- operative planning, especially if osteotomy is planned

Coronal CLASSIFICATIONS

 Stephens and Sanders  Type I  Lateral exostosis with or without lateral arthrosis of  Type II  Type I + arthrosis of entire jjj oint  Type III  Type II + malunion of the calcaneal body

 Stephens & Sanders, Foot Ankle, 1996 CLASSIFICATIONS

 Stephens and Sanders  Problem with this clifiiidlassification is doesn’ t address:  Loss of talar height  Loss of talar inclination (normal 21 d)degrees )  Indications for a distraction arthrodesis CLASSIFICATIONS

 Zwipp and Rammelt  Type 1: Incongruence of the joint  Type 2: 1 + Hindfoot varus/valgus  Type 3: 2 + Loss of hihheight  Type 4: 3 + Translation  Type 5: 4 + Talar tilt

 Zwipp & Rammelt, Zbl Chir, 2003 TREATMENT

 Conservative Care  This has NO Role  Patients have already failed conservative care  Goal of Surgical Treatment  Improve the alignment of thhidfhe hindfoot  Decrease bony pr omin en ces  Decrease pain TREATMENT

 Soft Tissue  Bony Procedures Procedures  Exostectomies  Repair of Peroneal  InIn--situsitu fusion tendon subluxation,  Distraction dislocation, or arthrod esi s stenosis  Reconstructive osteotomies  Lengthen  Combinations  SlNSural Neurectomy TREATMENT  Soft Tissue Reconstruction  To obtain hindfoot height  Must lengthen Achilles tendon  Hoke 33--cutcut Release  Strayer TREATMENT

 Soft Tissue Reconstruction  Repair the peroneal tendon pathology  Often corrects with lateral wall exostectomy  Detach Peroneal retinaculum as periosteal sleeve from fibula and staple or anchor to posterior fibula surface TREATMENT

 Bony Reconstruction  DO NOT NEED A PERFECT REDUCTION  Improve the alignment of the hindfoot  +/+/--OsteotomiesOsteotomies  Decrease bony prominences  May need a fusion TREATMENT

 Osteotomies/Exostectomies  Fibular Osteotomy  Resection of the tip of the fibula  Does not address pathology of calcaneus  Ibister, JBJS, 1974 Fibular Resection  Lateral Wall Exostectomy  Decreases lateral impingement  MlMay also remove t hfhe far lateral joint if arthrosis is present

Lateral Wall Exostectomy TREATMENT

 Osteotomies/Exostectomies  Varus/Valgus Osteotomy  Corrects malalignment of the hindfoot  Doesn’t address arthrosis

 Sliding Corrective Osteotomy  Does not improve talar declination  DddiDoes not address anterior ankle impingement  Huang et al, Foot Ankle Int, 1999 TREATMENT

 Fusions  InIn--SituSitu Fusion  Good results regardless of talar height or talar inclination if anterior ipiimpingemen tibt is absen t  Need to have greater than 10 degrees of ankle driflindorsiflexion  Chandler et al, Foot Ankle Int, 1999 TREATMENT  Combinations: Fusions/Osteotomies  Romash Osteotomy  Osteotomy through primary fracture line  Restores bony anatomy  Romash, Foot Ankle, 1988

 Dis trac tion A rth rod esi s  Improves talar inclination  Restores hindfoot height  Can correct malalignment of hindfoot without osteotomy  Carr et al, Foot Ankle,1988 TREATMENT

 Author’ s Preferred Treatment  Clinical Exam  No Peroneal tendon dislocation  Dorsiflexion >10 degrees  Radiographic Exam  Bohler’s angle >15 degrees  No arthritis of subtalar joint

TREATMENT: Exostectomy lateral wall TREATMENT

 Author’s Preferred Treatment  Clinical Exam  No Peroneal tendon dislocation  Dorsiflexion <10 degrees  Radiographic Exam  Bohler’s angle <15 degrees  AhiiArthritis su blbtalar jijoint  No varus/valgus malalignment of calcaneus

 TREATMENT: Strayer, Exostectomy, Distraction arthrodesis TREATMENT

 Author’s Preferred Treatment  Clinical Exam  Peroneal tendon dislocation  Dorsiflexion <10 degrees  RdiRadiographi hiEc Exam  Bohler’s angle <15 degrees  Arthritis subtalar joint  varus/valgggus malalignment of calcaneus

 TREATMENT: Strayer, Exostectomy, Distraction arthrodesis, Osteotomy of Calcaneus, Repair dislocation tendon, Sural Neurectomy BONE LOSS

Marine, Afghanistan, IED, open calcaneus with bone loss

BONE LOSS

Positive for Infection BONE LOSS BONE LOSS

Femoral Head + RIA BONE LOSS CONCLUSIONS

 Malunions  Decreases height  Alters lever arm effect of calcaneus  Flattens talar inclination and talocalcaneal angle  Fibul a i mpi ngement  Increases width  Results in lateral exostosis  Varus/valgus malalignment CONCLUSIONS

 Goal of Surgical Treatment  Improve the alignment of the hindfoot  Decrease bony prominences  Decrease pain  DO NOT NEED A PERFECT REDUCTION CONCLUSIONS

 PrePre--ooppgerative Planning  Good Clinical Exam  Adequate X-X-raysrays and CT scans CONCLUSIONS

 Treatment  Soft Tissue reconstructions  Bony reconstructions THANK YOU