Sound Transit Point Defiance Bypass Project Incident Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sound Transit Point Defiance Bypass Project Incident Review SOUND TRANSIT POINT DEFIANCE BYPASS PROJECT INCIDENT REVIEW NOVEMBER 11, 2019 Final Report PREPARED BY L & H CONSULTING GROUP, LLC P.O. NUMBER 176601 OP PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK L & H Consulting Group, LLC INTRODUCTION ........................................................................ 1 1 BACKGROUND .............................................................. 2 TABLE OF 2 APPROACH TO THE INCIDENT REVIEW ...................... 4 CONTENTS 3 FEDERAL & STATE REGULATIONS & INDUSTRY PRACTICE IN SAFETY CERTIFICATION ........................ 6 Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) ......................................... 6 Federal Transit Administration (FTA) ............................................ 9 Washington State Regulations .................................................... 13 Industry Practice in Safety Certification ..................................... 14 4 SOUND TRANSIT SAFETY & SECURITY CERTIFICATION PROGRAM ........................................ 15 5 GAP ANALYSIS & FINDINGS ....................................... 17 PDBP Contractual Relationships & Agreements .........................17 Sound Transit’s Safety Management Plans ................................. 21 Sound transit’s Hazard Management Process & Procedures .... 26 Sound Transit’s Safety Certification Process & Procedures ...... 29 Sound Transit’s Internal Departmental Coordination for the PDBP ............................................................................................. 33 Summary of All Gap Analysis Findings ........................................ 36 6 SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS ......................... 39 Summary....................................................................................... 39 Recommendations ....................................................................... 39 ACRONYMS & DEFINITIONS ...................................................42 FIGURES Figure 1. Point Defiance Bypass Project (2017) ................................ 2 Figure 2. Safety Risk Management Process ................................... 27 Figure 3. Industry Probability Definitions ...................................... 27 Figure 4. Probability Definitions (2015 Sound Transit Agency SSMP) 28 Figure 5. Sound Transit Safety and Security Management Committees ...................................................................... 33 Figure 6. Sound Transit Safety and Security Risk Approval Structure .......................................................................... 34 TABLES Table 1. PDBP Milestones ................................................................. 15 Table 2. Gap Analysis Findings ........................................................ 36 Table 3. Acronyms ........................................................................... 42 Table 4. Definitions.......................................................................... 43 APPENDICES A KICKOFF MEETING MINUTES B DOCUMENTS REVIEWED C INTERVIEW QUESTIONS D SOUND TRANSIT INTERVIEWEES L & H Consulting Group, LLC INTRODUCTION Following its investigation of the December 18, 2017 Amtrak derailment from a bridge near DuPont, WA (“Amtrak derailment”), the National Transportation Safety Board Throughout this report, (NTSB) made recommendations to the Central Puget Sound terms included in the Regional Transit Authority (Sound Transit). Sound Transit is Acronyms & Definitions addressing these NTSB recommendations in part by section are bolded upon contracting with an independent third-party to conduct an first use. incident review of the Amtrak derailment. The review emphasizes the Sound Transit safety and security certification process utilized for the Point Defiance Bypass Project (PDBP). This Incident Review Report is organized into the following sections: Section 1: Background of the Accident and NTSB Investigation Section 2: Approach to the Incident Review Describes the step-by-step approach utilized to identify any deficiencies in Sound Transit’s PDBP’s safety risk management and safety certification processes, and to develop recommendations to address identified deficiencies. Section 3: Federal and State Regulations and Industry Practice in Safety Certification Reviews applicable Federal and State regulations, rules and industry practices, and an inventory of commuter rail systems’ safety certification programs. Section 4: Sound Transit Safety and Security Certification Program Reviews Sound Transit’s safety certification program, including the agency’s safety-related plans and PDBP documents, and the interviews conducted with Sound Transit staff involved in the PDBP and its safety certification program. Section 5: Gap Analysis and Findings Provides a gap analysis and associated set of findings based on Sections 1 through 4 that identify strengths and deficiencies associated with Sound Transit’s safety certification program. Section 6: Summary and Recommendations Provides a summary of this incident report and recommendations to address gaps and deficiencies identified in the Section 5 gap analysis and findings. Point Defiance Bypass Project L & H Consulting Group, LLC Incident Review Final Report Page 1 1 BACKGROUND In 2006, the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) developed its long-range plan for improving Amtrak Cascades service between Vancouver, British Columbia, and Portland, Oregon. WSDOT applied for and received federal American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) intercity high-speed rail grants in 2009 and 2010 to undertake the first set of improvements included in their long-range plan. After being awarded approximately $751.5 million in funding, WSDOT began 20 rail infrastructure projects, including the PDBP. The $181 million PDBP was WSDOT’s final project under the ARRA grant funding package. Initiated in late 2014 and completed by the 2017 grant funding deadline, the purpose of the PDBP was to improve passenger train reliability by reducing congestion with freight trains and travel times, by means of re-routing existing service to an inland route, as shown in Figure 1 below. Figure 1. Point Defiance Bypass Project (2017) Point Defiance Bypass Project L & H Consulting Group, LLC Incident Review Final Report Page 2 Sound Transit was the contractor for WSDOT on the construction of the PDBP. Sound Transit in turn hired contractors to undertake the construction work while performing the safety certification in-house. Sound Transit completed safety certification of the PDBP in accordance with the agency’s 2015 Safety and Security Management Plan (SSMP). The Sound Transit Safety and Quality Assurance (SQA)1 Department provided the PDBP Safety Certification Verification Report in October 2017, which included the signed Certificates of Conformance. This report was accepted by the Rail Activation Committee (RAC). By accepting the PDBP Safety Certification Verification Report, Sound Transit only certified that the PDBP was ready for WSDOT and Amtrak to initiate pre-revenue testing, not that the pre-revenue testing was completed. After pre-revenue testing was completed, Sound Transit did not receive any reports from Amtrak or WSDOT of issues with the operating system. The PDBP Safety Certification Verification Report was not updated to reflect completion of the pre-revenue testing or of operational readiness. On December 18, 2017, Amtrak began its inaugural operation of the PDBP revenue service. At approximately 7:33 am Pacific Standard Time that morning, westbound Amtrak Train #501 was on single main track from Tacoma when it approached a 30-mph curve at too high of a speed and derailed at milepost 19.8 on the Lakewood sub-division near DuPont, Washington. Several passenger cars fell from a bridge at the curve onto Interstate 5 and hit highway vehicles. The train consisted of two locomotives and twelve passenger cars. Three Amtrak passengers died in the accident and multiple people were injured. The NTSB conducted an investigation of the Amtrak Train #501 derailment and issued its Accident Report on May 21, 20192. The NTSB’s determination of the probable cause of the derailment was Sound Transit’s “failure to provide an effective mitigation for the hazardous curve without positive train control in place, which allowed the Amtrak engineer to enter the 30-mph curve at too high of a speed due to his inadequate training on the territory and inadequate training on the newest equipment. Contributing to the accident was the Washington State Department of Transportation’s decision to start revenue service without being assured that safety certification and verification had been completed to the level determined in the preliminary hazard assessment.” Based on its investigation, the NTSB Accident Report includes both new and reiterated recommendations to the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), and new recommendations to Amtrak, WSDOT and Sound Transit. The three recommendations specific to Sound Transit are: Immediately conduct a review of all operating documents and ensure that safety mitigations are applied with uniformity throughout the entirety of your territory. (R-19-030) In areas of your territory where you are a host of a tenant railroad, coordinate with all current and any prospective tenants on the development of operating documents including timetables, general orders, and special instructions. (R-19-031) Review your internal process for safety certification and verification, perform a gap analysis, and develop an action plan to address the deficiencies identified in the gap analysis and detailed in this report to enhance
Recommended publications
  • Sounder Expansion to Dupont
    S-17: Sounder Expansion to DuPont Project Number S-17 PROJECT AREA AND REPRESENTATIVE ALIGNMENT Subarea Pierce Primary Mode Commuter Rail Facility Type Station Length 7.8 miles Version ST Board Workshop Date Last Modified 11-25-2015 SHORT PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project would extend Sounder commuter rail service from Lakewood to Tillicum and DuPont with two new stations. Note: The elements included in this representative project will be refined during future phases of project development and are subject to change. KEY ATTRIBUTES REGIONAL LIGHT No RAIL SPINE Does this project help complete the light rail spine? CAPITAL COST $289 — $309 Cost in Millions of 2014 $ RIDERSHIP 1,000 — 2,000 2040 daily boardings PROJECT ELEMENTS · One at-grade station: Tillicum neighborhood of Lakewood near the intersection of I-5 and Berkeley Avenue SW, sized to accommodate 7-car trains or longer if Projects S-06 or S-07 are implemented · Pedestrian plaza at Tillicum Station · Surface parking at the Tillicum with approximately 125 stalls; the scope of the transit parking components included in this project could be revised to include a range of strategies for providing rider access to the transit facility; along with, or instead of, parking for private vehicles or van pools, a mix of other investments could be accomplished through the budget for this project · One at-grade station: Sound Transit’s existing DuPont Station on Wilmington Drive, just northeast of the intersection of I-5 and Center Drive in DuPont, sized to accommodate 7-car trains or longer if Projects S- 06 or S-07 are implemented · A second mainline track from Bridgeport Way SW to the DuPont Station · One new layover and train storage facility southwest of the proposed DuPont station with a capacity for five trains · Operator welfare building and security equipment · 4 trains in the a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • HQ-2017-1239 Final.Pdf
    Federal Railroad Administration Office of Railroad Safety Accident and Analysis Branch Accident Investigation Report HQ-2017-1239 Amtrak 501 DuPont, Washington December 18, 2017 Note that 49 U.S.C. §20903 provides that no part of an accident or incident report, including this one, made by the Secretary of Transportation/Federal Railroad Administration under 49 U.S.C. §20902 may be used in a civil action for damages resulting from a matter mentioned in the report. U.S. Department of Transportation FRA File #HQ-2017-1239 Federal Railroad Administration FRA FACTUAL RAILROAD ACCIDENT REPORT SYNOPSIS On December 18, 2017, at 7:33 a.m., PST, southbound National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) Passenger Train Number 501 (Train 501) derailed in an 8-degree, 22-minute, left-hand curve at Milepost (MP) 19.86 on the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority, Sounder Commuter Rail (Sound Transit) Lakewood Subdivision, in DuPont, Washington. The lead locomotive and 12 cars derailed, with some sliding down an embankment, and some landing on the southbound lanes of Interstate 5, colliding with several highway vehicles. Train 501 is part of the Amtrak Cascades passenger train service funded by the States of Washington and Oregon. The Cascades passenger train service operates between Vancouver, British Columbia, and Eugene, Oregon, using Talgo, Inc. (Talgo) passenger equipment. DuPont, Washington, is located approximately 18 miles southwest of Tacoma, Washington. Sound Transit is the host railroad to Amtrak on the Lakewood Subdivision, which is approximately 20 miles in length from Tacoma to DuPont. Train 501 was traveling from Seattle, Washington, to Portland, Oregon, over the Point Defiance Bypass track between Tacoma and DuPont.
    [Show full text]
  • WSDOT Report Template
    Chapter 3 Plan Alternatives 1 What geographic area does the Transportation 2040 plan cover? The central Puget Sound region is made up of King, Kitsap, Pierce, and Snohomish counties, and their 82 cities and towns (refer to Exhibit 3-1). The major metropolitan cities of the region are Seattle and Bellevue in King County, Bremerton in Kitsap County, Tacoma in Pierce County, and Everett in Snohomish County. What is included in the Metropolitan Transportation System (MTS)? 2 What makes up the region’s Metropolitan Transportation System? The MTS promotes facilities and services for carrying out activities The Metropolitan Transportation System (MTS) for the central crucial to the social and economic health of the central Puget Sound Puget Sound region facilitates the movement of people and region. Components of the MTS goods making local, regional, national, and international trips. include: These trips range from traveling to work or school, flying ▪ Roadway system across the country, or shipping Washington-made products ▪ Ferry system overseas. ▪ Transit systems These trips are made using a variety of travel choices. Those ▪ Nonmotorized system choices are key elements of the MTS. ▪ Freight and goods system Roadway System ▪ Intercity passenger rail system ▪ Regional airport system The region has thousands of miles of roadways ranging from ▪ Transportation System interstate highways to residential streets. Roadways are the Management primary means for moving people and goods from one location ▪ Transportation Demand to another in the region and beyond. The interstate system, Management which includes Interstate 5 (I-5), Interstate 405 (I-405), and Exhibit 3-1. Central Puget Sound Region Cities and Towns P:\Graphics\554-2284-010\03\01_04\07\09 Puget Sound Regional Council 3-3 Interstate 90 (I-90), was created to support national commerce and defense needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Point Defiance Bypass Project Environmental Assessment
    Point Defiance Bypass Project Environmental Assessment Prepared for: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Railroad Administration Prepared by: For more information you can: Call the WSDOT Rail Office at (360) 705-7900 Write to the WSDOT Rail Office at WSDOT Rail Office, P.O. Box 47407 Olympia, WA 98504-7407 Fax your comments to (360) 705-6821 E-mail your comments to [email protected] Title VI Notice to Public It is the Washington State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) policy to assure that no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin or sex, as provided by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise discriminated against under any of its federally funded programs and activities. Any person who believes his/her Title VI protection has been violated may file a complaint with WSDOT's Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO). For Title VI complaint forms and advice, please contact OEO’s Title VI Coordinators, George Laue at (509) 324-6018 or Jonte' Sulton at (360) 705-7082. Persons with disabilities may request this information be prepared and supplied in alternate forms by calling the WSDOT ADA Accommodations Hotline collect at (206) 389-2839. Persons with vision or hearing impairments may access the WA State Telecommunications Relay Service at TT 1-800-833-6388, Tele-Braille at 1-800-833-6385, or voice at 1-800-833- 6384, and ask to be connected to (360) 705-7097. Point Defiance Bypass Project Environmental Assessment Submitted pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Amtrak Cascades Train 501 Derailment - Dec
    Amtrak Cascades Train 501 Derailment - Dec. 18, 2017 Last Updated: Dec. 18, 2017 at 3 p.m. ET Where did the derailment of Amtrak Cascades Train 501 occur? The derailment occurred in DuPont, Wash., where the railroad crosses I-5 southwest of the Eagles Pride Golf Course – at railroad milepost 19.79. The railroad bridge crosses the highway just west of where Mounts Rd SW and Nisqually Rd SW meet and also cross I-5. What time did the derailment occur? It occurred at approximately 7:34 a.m. Pacific Time. Who owns the tracks where the derailment occurred? The track where the derailment occurred – known as the Point Defiance Bypass – is owned by Sound Transit, which also operates over a portion of it. BNSF dispatches trains over the bypass. What was the consist of Train 501? Amtrak Cascades Train 501 consisted of two locomotives – a Charger diesel locomotive and a P- 42 – as well as 12 passenger cars. The latter included Business class and Coach cars and a Bistro food service car. A standard Talgo coach car contains approximately 36 seats. The Talgo trainset and Charger locomotive involved in the derailment are owned by WSDOT. How many passengers and Amtrak staff were onboard Train 501 when it derailed? There were approximately 80 customers onboard, five Amtrak crew members, and one Talgo technician. What is the Point Defiance Bypass Project? 1 On the map above, orange indicates the bypass, while green is the BNSF route along Puget Sound used by Amtrak Cascades trains through Dec. 17, 2017. Service via the bypass began on Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Point Defiance Bypass for High-Speed Intercity Passenger Rail
    Assessment of Point Defiance Bypass for High-Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Carter Danne, PE, PTOE Abstract This paper provides a synopsis of the assessment of high-speed intercity passenger rail improvements for the Point Defiance Bypass project and lessons learned from the assessment. Passenger rail has less of a carbon footprint than travel by airplane or standard automobile and in that aspect is a more sustainable mode of transportation. As the lead federal agency, the Federal Railroad Administration granted funds to the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) to improve the Pacific Northwest Rail Corridor where Amtrak currently provides high-speed intercity passenger rail service. The existing service travels along Puget Sound around Point Defiance in Pierce County, where it encounters some operational limitations. In response to these limitations, WSDOT identified an alternate route to improve service that bypasses Point Defiance and travels inland on an existing rail alignment. The author has summarized the highlights of the alternative’s effects on the transportation system. Of particular interest was how a relatively infrequent train crossing event, affected the system both for the short period of time during the crossing and after when queues clear as well as the overall peak hour. Effects on safety were also considered for the existing and alternative alignments; using collision prediction to illustrate the relative safety with the project. Additionally, in preparing the project report and presenting the findings, several lessons were learned. The author has summarized these lessons to share the knowledge gained. In particular, specific lessons are included about the analysis and communication of complex project information.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Report Sounder Program
    Progress Report Sounder Program The Tacoma Trestle construction contractor’s crane was used to move formwork and rebar for the south platform June | 2017 Prepared by Project Control l Design, Engineering & Construction Management June 2017 Page 105 of 142 Sounder Commuter Rail Program Overview Sounder provides commuter rail service between Everett and Lakewood June 2017 Page 106 of 142 Sounder Commuter Rail Program Overview Projects Below is a summary description for each active project under the Sounder Commuter Rail Capital Program. Project status information can be found on the following projects pages. Auburn Station Access Improvements: Project includes alternatives identification, screening, environmental documentation, design and construction of station access improvements at or around Auburn Station. The purpose of the project is to improve access to the existing Sounder Auburn Station for Sounder riders, bicyclists, bus riders, and drivers. Kent Station Access Improvements: Project includes alternatives identification, screening, environmental documentation, design and construction of station access improvements at or around Kent Station. The purpose of the project is to improve access to the existing Sounder Kent Station for Sounder riders, bicyclists, bus riders, and drivers. Mukilteo Station, South Platform: Full build-out of this station included construction of a second platform, overhead pedestrian bridge, elevators, stair tower, and passenger shelters. Sounder service at the south platform began on April 11, 2016. The
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State Short Line Rail Inventory and Needs Assessment
    Washington State Short Line Rail Inventory and Needs Assessment WA-RD 842.1 Jeremy Sage June 2015 Ken Casavant J. Bradley Eustice WSDOT Research Report Office of Research & Library Services 15-06-0240 WASHINGTON STATE SHORT LINE RAIL INVENTORY AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT Washington State Department of Transportation PO Box 47407 310 Maple Park Avenue SE Olympia, WA 98504-7407 360-705-7900 www.wsdot.gov Prepared by: Freight Policy Transportation Institute Washington State University Hulbert Hall 101 Pullman, WA 99164-6210 Acknowledgements Washington State Department of Transportation Lynn Peterson, Secretary of Transportation Cam Gilmour, Deputy Secretary Barb Ivanov, Freight Systems Director External Expert Review Team Patrick Boss, Columbia Basin Railroad Jennie Dickinson, Port of Columbia Carla Groleau, Genesee & Wyoming Railroad Dale King, Tacoma Rail Alan Matheson, Tacoma Rail Glen Squires, Washington Grain Commission Brig Temple, Columbia Basin Railroad Jeff Swanson, Clark County WSDOT Internal Review Team Jason Beloso, Rail Planning Manager John Gruber, Regional Planning Manager Kathy Murray, Multimodal Planning Division Project Team WSDOT FPTI Doug Brodin, Research Manager Dr. Jeremy Sage Chris Herman, Freight Rail Program Dr. Kenneth Casavant Matthew Pahs, Freight Planning Program J. Bradley Eustice Thomas Noyes, Urban Planning Office Bob Westby, PCC Railway System This material is based upon work supported by WSDOT research report number WA-RD 842.1 The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Washington State Department of Transportation. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.
    [Show full text]
  • National Transportation Safety Board Investigative Hearing
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 06/15/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-12846, and on FDsys.gov BILLING CODE: 7533-01-P National Transportation Safety Board Investigative Hearing Two recent Amtrak (National Railroad Passenger Corporation) accidents have motivated this investigative hearing: first, an Amtrak overspeed derailment in a 30 mph curve that occurred in DuPont, Washington, and, second, an Amtrak head-on collision with a standing freight train in Cayce, South Carolina. The first accident occurred on December 18, 2017, at 7:33 a.m., Pacific standard time, and involved southbound Amtrak passenger train 501, consisting of a leading and trailing locomotive, a power car, 10 passenger railcars, and a luggage car. Train 501 was traveling at 78 mph when it derailed from a highway overpass near DuPont, Washington. The train was on its first regular passenger service trip on a single main track (Lakewood subdivision) at milepost (MP) 19.86. The lead locomotive, the power car, and two passenger railcars derailed onto Interstate 5. Fourteen highway vehicles came into contact with the derailed equipment. At the time of the accident, 77 passengers, 5 Amtrak employees, and a Talgo Incorporated technician were on the train.1 Of these individuals, 3 passengers were killed and 62 passengers and crewmembers were injured. Eight individuals in highway vehicles were also injured. The damage is estimated to be more than $40 million. At the time of the accident, the temperature was 48°F, the wind was from the south at 9 mph, and the visibility was 10 miles in light rain.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Note Package 58909
    Multiple Agency Fiscal Note Summary Bill Number: 6321 SB Title: NTSB recommend. compliance Estimated Cash Receipts NONE Local Gov. Courts Loc School dist-SPI Local Gov. Other No fiscal impact Local Gov. Total Estimated Operating Expenditures Agency Name 2019-21 2021-23 2023-25 FTEs GF-State Total FTEs GF-State Total FTEs GF-State Total Utilities and .9 0 443,936 .0 0 0 .0 0 0 Transportation Commission Department of Non-zero but indeterminate cost and/or savings. Please see discussion. Transportation Total $ 0.9 0 443,936 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 Local Gov. Courts Loc School dist-SPI Local Gov. Other No fiscal impact Local Gov. Total Estimated Capital Budget Expenditures Agency Name 2019-21 2021-23 2023-25 FTEs Bonds Total FTEs Bonds Total FTEs Bonds Total Utilities and .0 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 0 Transportation Commission Department of .0 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 0 Transportation Total $ 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 Estimated Capital Budget Breakout Prepared by: Jenna Forty, OFM Phone: Date Published: (360) 902-0419 Final 1/27/2020 FNPID: 58909 FNS029 Multi Agency rollup Individual State Agency Fiscal Note Bill Number: 6321 SB Title: NTSB recommend. compliance Agency: 215-Utilities and Transportation Commission Part I: Estimates No Fiscal Impact Estimated Cash Receipts to: NONE Estimated Operating Expenditures from: FY 2020 FY 2021 2019-21 2021-23 2023-25 FTE Staff Years 1.2 0.6 0.9 0.0 0.0 Account Public Service Revolving 345,730 98,206 443,936 0 0 Account-State 111-1 Total $ 345,730 98,206 443,936 0 0 Estimated Capital Budget Impact: NONE The cash receipts and expenditure estimates on this page represent the most likely fiscal impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State Rail System 2009
    Blaine 31 B 539 N Oroville Rail System Key S Northport Metaline F 542 K BNSF Railway (BNSF) F Falls R Ballard Terminal Railroad (BDTL) BIRR Bellingham Whatcom Pend Bellingham International Railroad (BIRR) LW 20 R Okanogan Tonasket 20 Oreille Cascade and Columbia River Railroad (CSCD) Friday F Republic Kettle Falls S Newhalem P Central Washington Railroad (CW) D Harbor N Colville O C Anacortes B 2 K V Chehalis-Centralia RR & Museum (POCH) S F A C Ferry Winthrop R Columbia Basin Railroad (CBRW) Neah Bay San T Sedro-Woolley Rockport V Columbia and Cowlitz Railway (CLC) Juan Omak 25 395 M Mount Vernon Skagit Department of Defense - Army (USA) Chewelah Okanogan Department of the Army Island 9 155 Eastern Washington Gateway (EWG) Darrington Port 530 153 97 Newport Great Northwest Railroad (GRNW) 112 F Townsend Coupeville S N Brewster Kettle Falls International Railway (KFR) B Stevens Port B Lake Whatcom Railway (LWR) N Forks Angeles 101 Snohomish SF Longview Switching Company (LSC) 174 Clallam Everett Chelan Bridgeport Spokane Meeker Southern Railroad (MSN) F Mount Vernon Terminal (MVT) S Edmonds N D Palouse River and Coulee City Railroad (PCC) B C 172 S Wilbur Pend Oreille Valley Railroad (POVA) F C F NS BNS B E Spokane Port of Royal Slope Line Jefferson Kitsap 5 405 Douglas W Davenport UP BDTL Skykomish Waterville 2 G Portland Vancouver Junction Railroad (PVJR) Queets Bremerton Leavenworth Puget Sound and Pacific Railroad (PSAP) Seattle U King Coulee City Lincoln P Royal Slope Line (RS) 21 Port Orchard 119 Tacoma Rail Capital/Tidelands Division
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State Long-Range Plan for Amtrak Cascades
    Washington State Long-Range Plan for Amtrak Cascades February 2006 Prepared by the Freight Systems Division Washington State Department of Transportation February 2006 For more information, contact: z Call the WSDOT State Rail Office at (360) 705-7900 or 1-800-822-2015; z Write to the WSDOT State Rail Office at P.O. Box 47407, Olympia, WA 98504-7407; z Fax your comments to (360) 705-6821; or z E-mail your comments to [email protected] Persons with disabilities may request this information be prepared and supplied in alternate forms by calling the WSDOT ADA Accommodation Hotline collect 206-389-2839. Persons with vision or hearing impairments may access the WA State Telecommunications Relay Service at TT 1-800-833-6388, Tele-Braille 1-800-833-6385, or Voice 1-800-833-6384, and ask to be connected to 360-705-7097. Washington State Long-Range Plan for Amtrak Cascades Prepared for the Washington State Department of Transportation By The Resource Group Consultants, Inc. Transit Safety Management, Inc. HDR Engineering, Inc. Berk & Associates, Inc. AECOM Consult, Inc. February 2006 Table of Contents List of Exhibits .......................................................................................................iii Executive Summary................................................................................................v Chapter One: Introduction ..................................................................................1-1 What is intercity passenger rail? .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]