DOCSLIB.ORG

Fiscal Note Package 58909

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Multiple Agency Fiscal Note Summary Bill Number: 6321 SB Title: NTSB recommend. compliance Estimated Cash Receipts NONE Local Gov. Courts Loc School dist-SPI Local Gov. Other No fiscal impact Local Gov. Total Estimated Operating Expenditures Agency Name 2019-21 2021-23 2023-25 FTEs GF-State Total FTEs GF-State Total FTEs GF-State Total Utilities and .9 0 443,936 .0 0 0 .0 0 0 Transportation Commission Department of Non-zero but indeterminate cost and/or savings. Please see discussion. Transportation Total $ 0.9 0 443,936 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 Local Gov. Courts Loc School dist-SPI Local Gov. Other No fiscal impact Local Gov. Total Estimated Capital Budget Expenditures Agency Name 2019-21 2021-23 2023-25 FTEs Bonds Total FTEs Bonds Total FTEs Bonds Total Utilities and .0 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 0 Transportation Commission Department of .0 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 0 Transportation Total $ 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 Estimated Capital Budget Breakout Prepared by: Jenna Forty, OFM Phone: Date Published: (360) 902-0419 Final 1/27/2020 FNPID: 58909 FNS029 Multi Agency rollup Individual State Agency Fiscal Note Bill Number: 6321 SB Title: NTSB recommend. compliance Agency: 215-Utilities and Transportation Commission Part I: Estimates No Fiscal Impact Estimated Cash Receipts to: NONE Estimated Operating Expenditures from: FY 2020 FY 2021 2019-21 2021-23 2023-25 FTE Staff Years 1.2 0.6 0.9 0.0 0.0 Account Public Service Revolving 345,730 98,206 443,936 0 0 Account-State 111-1 Total $ 345,730 98,206 443,936 0 0 Estimated Capital Budget Impact: NONE The cash receipts and expenditure estimates on this page represent the most likely fiscal impact. Factors impacting the precision of these estimates, and alternate ranges (if appropriate), are explained in Part II. Check applicable boxes and follow corresponding instructions: If fiscal impact is greater than $50,000 per fiscal year in the current biennium or in subsequent biennia, complete entire fiscal note X form Parts I-V. If fiscal impact is less than $50,000 per fiscal year in the current biennium or in subsequent biennia, complete this page only (Part I). Capital budget impact, complete Part IV. Requires new rule making, complete Part V. Legislative Contact: Daniel Masterson Phone: 360-786-7454 Date: 01/21/2020 Agency Preparation: Melissa Hamilton Phone: 360 664-1158 Date: 01/27/2020 Agency Approval: Jon Noski Phone: 360-664-1209 Date: 01/27/2020 OFM Review: Jenna Forty Phone: (360) 902-0419 Date: 01/27/2020 Form FN (Rev 1/00) 156,732.00 Request # 20-20-2 FNS063 Individual State Agency Fiscal Note 1 Bill # 6321 SB Part II: Narrative Explanation II. A - Brief Description Of What The Measure Does That Has Fiscal Impact Briefly describe by section number, the significant provisions of the bill, and any related workload or policy assumptions, that have revenue or expenditure impact on the responding agency. Section 1 - The legislation directs Utilities and Transportation Commission (UTC) to conduct a review of actions taken by Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), AMTRAK, and Sound Transit towards compliance with the recommendations made by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) after the Amtrak 501 derailment. UTC is also required to monitor the above-mentioned entities until the UTC has confirmation that the entities have complied with the recommendations made by the NTSB. By December 1, 2020, the UTC would be required to report to the Governor and transportation committees the details and actions taken by the above-mentioned entities related to the NTSB recommendations respective to each entity. Passenger rail service on the Point Defiance bypass rail corridor may not resume and no state funds shall be expended for the service until ten (10) days after the UTC provides the required report and submits confirmation to the Governor and transportation committees that the above-mentioned entities have complied with all applicable recommendations in the NTSB report. II. B - Cash receipts Impact Briefly describe and quantify the cash receipts impact of the legislation on the responding agency, identifying the cash receipts provisions by section number and when appropriate the detail of the revenue sources. Briefly describe the factual basis of the assumptions and the method by which the cash receipts impact is derived. Explain how workload assumptions translate into estimates. Distinguish between one time and ongoing functions. No Cash Receipt Impact II. C - Expenditures Briefly describe the agency expenditures necessary to implement this legislation (or savings resulting from this legislation), identifying by section number the provisions of the legislation that result in the expenditures (or savings). Briefly describe the factual basis of the assumptions and the method by which the expenditure impact is derived. Explain how workload assumptions translate into cost estimates. Distinguish between one time and ongoing functions. The financial impact to the UTC will be in the following areas: • Hiring a Transportation Specialist 5 to be the point person at the UTC in the role of coordinating the review of the actions taken by the above-referenced entities to comply with the NTSB report recommendations. • The legislation directs the UTC to conduct a review of actions taken by WSDOT, AMTRAK, and Sound Transit towards compliance with the recommendations made by the NTSB after the Amtrak 501 derailment. UTC is also required to monitor the above-mentioned entities until the UTC has confirmation that the entities have complied with the recommendations made by the NTSB. $130,632 FY 2020 (Transportation Planning Specialist 5: 0.21; Attorney General: 0.17; Director, Transportation Safety: 0.01; Policy Advisor: 0.01; Rail Safety Program Advisor: 0.04; Transportation Engineer 3: 0.08; Commissioner: 0.01; Administrative Law Judge: 0.01) • UTC will require additional staff to ensure it can meet the requirements of the legislation and produce a report within the required deadline. (activity 2) • Hiring a consultant to provide guidance and add the necessary expertise to properly analyze the NTSB recommendations and ensure that compliance is sufficient for the agency to report on. (activity 2 and 3) NTSB recommend. compliance 215-Utilities and Transportation Commission Form FN (Rev 1/00) 156,732.00 Request # 20-20-2 FNS063 Individual State Agency Fiscal Note 2 Bill # 6321 SB $215,098 FY 2020 (Transportation Planning Specialist 5: 0.29; Director, Transportation Safety: 0.06; Policy Advisor: 0.10; Rail Safety Program Advisor: 0.14; Director, Consumer Protection: 0.02; Commissioner: 0.03; Administrative Law Judge: 0.01) $98,206 FY 2021 (Transportation Planning Specialist 5: 0.24; Director, Transportation Safety: 0.04; Policy Advisor: 0.05; Rail Safety Program Advisor: 0.1; Commissioner: 0.02; Executive Director: 0.03; Transportation Engineer 3: 0.12) The audit and review of actions taken by the above-referenced agencies toward complying with the NTSB recommendations will likely include work that will take longer than 12 months. This is due in part to the lack of authority the UTC possesses to require the entities to produce records, the lack of UTC authority outside of the state of Washington, and the ambiguity of what an acceptable level of compliance may entail. The legal review by UTC and the AG's office is essential to ensure that the UTC conducts the review of the above-mentioned entities in a manner that is consistent with state and federal laws and meets the requirements of the NTSB recommendations. A rulemaking is not specified in the legislation but there may need to be an informal proceeding or workshop conducted to ensure that all parties have the opportunity to comment on perceived errors in the report and to ensure that all comments, decisions, and information collected or produced under the legislation are available to parties that wish to review. Part III: Expenditure Detail III. A - Operating Budget Expenditures Account Account Title Type FY 2020 FY 2021 2019-21 2021-23 2023-25 111-1 Public Service State 345,730 98,206 443,936 0 0 Revolving Account Total $ 345,730 98,206 443,936 0 0 III. B - Expenditures by Object Or Purpose FY 2020 FY 2021 2019-21 2021-23 2023-25 FTE Staff Years 1.2 0.6 0.9 A-Salaries and Wages 116,661 59,271 175,932 B-Employee Benefits 40,832 20,745 61,577 C-Professional Service Contracts 105,000 105,000 E-Goods and Other Services 83,237 18,190 101,427 G-Travel J-Capital Outlays M-Inter Agency/Fund Transfers N-Grants, Benefits & Client Services P-Debt Service S-Interagency Reimbursements T-Intra-Agency Reimbursements 9- Total $ 345,730 98,206 443,936 0 0 NTSB recommend. compliance 215-Utilities and Transportation Commission Form FN (Rev 1/00) 156,732.00 Request # 20-20-2 FNS063 Individual State Agency Fiscal Note 3 Bill # 6321 SB III. C - Operating FTE Detail: List FTEs by classification and corresponding annual compensation. Totals need to agree with total FTEs in Part I and Part IIIA Job Classification Salary FY 2020 FY 2021 2019-21 2021-23 2023-25 Administrative Law Judge 108,228 0.0 0.0 Commissioner 153,504 0.0 0.0 0.0 Director, Consumer Protection & 105,108 0.0 0.0 Communications Director, Transportation Safety 106,992 0.1 0.0 0.1 Executive Director 135,096 0.0 0.0 0.0 Policy Advisor 112,560 0.1 0.1 0.1 Rail Safety Program Advisor 86,460 0.2 0.1 0.1 Transportation Engineer 3 88,646 0.2 0.1 0.2 Transportation Planning Specialist 5 100,314 0.5 0.2 0.4 Total FTEs 1.2 0.6 0.9 0.0 III.
Recommended publications
  • Sounder Expansion to Dupont

    Sounder Expansion to Dupont

    S-17: Sounder Expansion to DuPont Project Number S-17 PROJECT AREA AND REPRESENTATIVE ALIGNMENT Subarea Pierce Primary Mode Commuter Rail Facility Type Station Length 7.8 miles Version ST Board Workshop Date Last Modified 11-25-2015 SHORT PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project would extend Sounder commuter rail service from Lakewood to Tillicum and DuPont with two new stations. Note: The elements included in this representative project will be refined during future phases of project development and are subject to change. KEY ATTRIBUTES REGIONAL LIGHT No RAIL SPINE Does this project help complete the light rail spine? CAPITAL COST $289 — $309 Cost in Millions of 2014 $ RIDERSHIP 1,000 — 2,000 2040 daily boardings PROJECT ELEMENTS · One at-grade station: Tillicum neighborhood of Lakewood near the intersection of I-5 and Berkeley Avenue SW, sized to accommodate 7-car trains or longer if Projects S-06 or S-07 are implemented · Pedestrian plaza at Tillicum Station · Surface parking at the Tillicum with approximately 125 stalls; the scope of the transit parking components included in this project could be revised to include a range of strategies for providing rider access to the transit facility; along with, or instead of, parking for private vehicles or van pools, a mix of other investments could be accomplished through the budget for this project · One at-grade station: Sound Transit’s existing DuPont Station on Wilmington Drive, just northeast of the intersection of I-5 and Center Drive in DuPont, sized to accommodate 7-car trains or longer if Projects S- 06 or S-07 are implemented · A second mainline track from Bridgeport Way SW to the DuPont Station · One new layover and train storage facility southwest of the proposed DuPont station with a capacity for five trains · Operator welfare building and security equipment · 4 trains in the a.m.
  • HQ-2017-1239 Final.Pdf

    HQ-2017-1239 Final.Pdf

    Federal Railroad Administration Office of Railroad Safety Accident and Analysis Branch Accident Investigation Report HQ-2017-1239 Amtrak 501 DuPont, Washington December 18, 2017 Note that 49 U.S.C. §20903 provides that no part of an accident or incident report, including this one, made by the Secretary of Transportation/Federal Railroad Administration under 49 U.S.C. §20902 may be used in a civil action for damages resulting from a matter mentioned in the report. U.S. Department of Transportation FRA File #HQ-2017-1239 Federal Railroad Administration FRA FACTUAL RAILROAD ACCIDENT REPORT SYNOPSIS On December 18, 2017, at 7:33 a.m., PST, southbound National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) Passenger Train Number 501 (Train 501) derailed in an 8-degree, 22-minute, left-hand curve at Milepost (MP) 19.86 on the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority, Sounder Commuter Rail (Sound Transit) Lakewood Subdivision, in DuPont, Washington. The lead locomotive and 12 cars derailed, with some sliding down an embankment, and some landing on the southbound lanes of Interstate 5, colliding with several highway vehicles. Train 501 is part of the Amtrak Cascades passenger train service funded by the States of Washington and Oregon. The Cascades passenger train service operates between Vancouver, British Columbia, and Eugene, Oregon, using Talgo, Inc. (Talgo) passenger equipment. DuPont, Washington, is located approximately 18 miles southwest of Tacoma, Washington. Sound Transit is the host railroad to Amtrak on the Lakewood Subdivision, which is approximately 20 miles in length from Tacoma to DuPont. Train 501 was traveling from Seattle, Washington, to Portland, Oregon, over the Point Defiance Bypass track between Tacoma and DuPont.
  • Point Defiance Bypass Project Environmental Assessment

    Point Defiance Bypass Project Environmental Assessment

    Point Defiance Bypass Project Environmental Assessment Prepared for: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Railroad Administration Prepared by: For more information you can: Call the WSDOT Rail Office at (360) 705-7900 Write to the WSDOT Rail Office at WSDOT Rail Office, P.O. Box 47407 Olympia, WA 98504-7407 Fax your comments to (360) 705-6821 E-mail your comments to [email protected] Title VI Notice to Public It is the Washington State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) policy to assure that no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin or sex, as provided by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise discriminated against under any of its federally funded programs and activities. Any person who believes his/her Title VI protection has been violated may file a complaint with WSDOT's Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO). For Title VI complaint forms and advice, please contact OEO’s Title VI Coordinators, George Laue at (509) 324-6018 or Jonte' Sulton at (360) 705-7082. Persons with disabilities may request this information be prepared and supplied in alternate forms by calling the WSDOT ADA Accommodations Hotline collect at (206) 389-2839. Persons with vision or hearing impairments may access the WA State Telecommunications Relay Service at TT 1-800-833-6388, Tele-Braille at 1-800-833-6385, or voice at 1-800-833- 6384, and ask to be connected to (360) 705-7097. Point Defiance Bypass Project Environmental Assessment Submitted pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
  • Amtrak Cascades Train 501 Derailment - Dec

    Amtrak Cascades Train 501 Derailment - Dec

    Amtrak Cascades Train 501 Derailment - Dec. 18, 2017 Last Updated: Dec. 18, 2017 at 3 p.m. ET Where did the derailment of Amtrak Cascades Train 501 occur? The derailment occurred in DuPont, Wash., where the railroad crosses I-5 southwest of the Eagles Pride Golf Course – at railroad milepost 19.79. The railroad bridge crosses the highway just west of where Mounts Rd SW and Nisqually Rd SW meet and also cross I-5. What time did the derailment occur? It occurred at approximately 7:34 a.m. Pacific Time. Who owns the tracks where the derailment occurred? The track where the derailment occurred – known as the Point Defiance Bypass – is owned by Sound Transit, which also operates over a portion of it. BNSF dispatches trains over the bypass. What was the consist of Train 501? Amtrak Cascades Train 501 consisted of two locomotives – a Charger diesel locomotive and a P- 42 – as well as 12 passenger cars. The latter included Business class and Coach cars and a Bistro food service car. A standard Talgo coach car contains approximately 36 seats. The Talgo trainset and Charger locomotive involved in the derailment are owned by WSDOT. How many passengers and Amtrak staff were onboard Train 501 when it derailed? There were approximately 80 customers onboard, five Amtrak crew members, and one Talgo technician. What is the Point Defiance Bypass Project? 1 On the map above, orange indicates the bypass, while green is the BNSF route along Puget Sound used by Amtrak Cascades trains through Dec. 17, 2017. Service via the bypass began on Dec.
  • Assessment of Point Defiance Bypass for High-Speed Intercity Passenger Rail

    Assessment of Point Defiance Bypass for High-Speed Intercity Passenger Rail

    Assessment of Point Defiance Bypass for High-Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Carter Danne, PE, PTOE Abstract This paper provides a synopsis of the assessment of high-speed intercity passenger rail improvements for the Point Defiance Bypass project and lessons learned from the assessment. Passenger rail has less of a carbon footprint than travel by airplane or standard automobile and in that aspect is a more sustainable mode of transportation. As the lead federal agency, the Federal Railroad Administration granted funds to the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) to improve the Pacific Northwest Rail Corridor where Amtrak currently provides high-speed intercity passenger rail service. The existing service travels along Puget Sound around Point Defiance in Pierce County, where it encounters some operational limitations. In response to these limitations, WSDOT identified an alternate route to improve service that bypasses Point Defiance and travels inland on an existing rail alignment. The author has summarized the highlights of the alternative’s effects on the transportation system. Of particular interest was how a relatively infrequent train crossing event, affected the system both for the short period of time during the crossing and after when queues clear as well as the overall peak hour. Effects on safety were also considered for the existing and alternative alignments; using collision prediction to illustrate the relative safety with the project. Additionally, in preparing the project report and presenting the findings, several lessons were learned. The author has summarized these lessons to share the knowledge gained. In particular, specific lessons are included about the analysis and communication of complex project information.
  • Progress Report Sounder Program

    Progress Report Sounder Program

    Progress Report Sounder Program The Tacoma Trestle construction contractor’s crane was used to move formwork and rebar for the south platform June | 2017 Prepared by Project Control l Design, Engineering & Construction Management June 2017 Page 105 of 142 Sounder Commuter Rail Program Overview Sounder provides commuter rail service between Everett and Lakewood June 2017 Page 106 of 142 Sounder Commuter Rail Program Overview Projects Below is a summary description for each active project under the Sounder Commuter Rail Capital Program. Project status information can be found on the following projects pages. Auburn Station Access Improvements: Project includes alternatives identification, screening, environmental documentation, design and construction of station access improvements at or around Auburn Station. The purpose of the project is to improve access to the existing Sounder Auburn Station for Sounder riders, bicyclists, bus riders, and drivers. Kent Station Access Improvements: Project includes alternatives identification, screening, environmental documentation, design and construction of station access improvements at or around Kent Station. The purpose of the project is to improve access to the existing Sounder Kent Station for Sounder riders, bicyclists, bus riders, and drivers. Mukilteo Station, South Platform: Full build-out of this station included construction of a second platform, overhead pedestrian bridge, elevators, stair tower, and passenger shelters. Sounder service at the south platform began on April 11, 2016. The
  • National Transportation Safety Board Investigative Hearing

    National Transportation Safety Board Investigative Hearing

    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 06/15/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-12846, and on FDsys.gov BILLING CODE: 7533-01-P National Transportation Safety Board Investigative Hearing Two recent Amtrak (National Railroad Passenger Corporation) accidents have motivated this investigative hearing: first, an Amtrak overspeed derailment in a 30 mph curve that occurred in DuPont, Washington, and, second, an Amtrak head-on collision with a standing freight train in Cayce, South Carolina. The first accident occurred on December 18, 2017, at 7:33 a.m., Pacific standard time, and involved southbound Amtrak passenger train 501, consisting of a leading and trailing locomotive, a power car, 10 passenger railcars, and a luggage car. Train 501 was traveling at 78 mph when it derailed from a highway overpass near DuPont, Washington. The train was on its first regular passenger service trip on a single main track (Lakewood subdivision) at milepost (MP) 19.86. The lead locomotive, the power car, and two passenger railcars derailed onto Interstate 5. Fourteen highway vehicles came into contact with the derailed equipment. At the time of the accident, 77 passengers, 5 Amtrak employees, and a Talgo Incorporated technician were on the train.1 Of these individuals, 3 passengers were killed and 62 passengers and crewmembers were injured. Eight individuals in highway vehicles were also injured. The damage is estimated to be more than $40 million. At the time of the accident, the temperature was 48°F, the wind was from the south at 9 mph, and the visibility was 10 miles in light rain.
  • Improving Intercity Passenger Rail Service in the United States

    Improving Intercity Passenger Rail Service in the United States

    Improving Intercity Passenger Rail Service in the United States Updated February 8, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45783 SUMMARY R45783 Improving Intercity Passenger Rail Service February 8, 2021 in the United States Ben Goldman The federal government has been involved in preserving and improving passenger rail service Analyst in Transportation since 1970, when the bankruptcies of several major railroads threatened the continuance of Policy passenger trains. Congress responded by creating Amtrak—officially, the National Railroad Passenger Corporation—to preserve a basic level of intercity passenger rail service, while relieving private railroad companies of the obligation to maintain a business that had lost money for decades. In the years since, the federal government has funded Amtrak and, in recent years, has funded passenger-rail efforts of varying size and complexity through grants, loans, and tax subsidies. Most recently, Congress has attempted to manage the effects on passenger rail brought about by the sudden drop in travel demand due to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Amtrak’s ridership and revenue growth trends were suddenly upended, and passenger rail service in many markets was either reduced or suspended. Efforts to improve intercity passenger rail can be broadly grouped into two categories: incremental improvement of existing services operated by Amtrak and implementation of new rail service where none currently exists. Efforts have been focused on identifying corridors where passenger rail travel times would be competitive with driving or flying (generally less than 500 miles long) and where population density and intercity travel demand create favorable conditions for rail service.
  • Amtrak Passenger Train 501 Derailment Dupont, Washington December 18, 2017

    Amtrak Passenger Train 501 Derailment Dupont, Washington December 18, 2017

    Amtrak Passenger Train 501 Derailment DuPont, Washington December 18, 2017 Accident Report NTSB/RAR-19/01 PB2019-100807 National Transportation Safety Board NTSB/RAR-19/01 PB2019-100807 Notation 58913 Report Date: May 21, 2019 Railroad Accident Report Amtrak Passenger Train 501 Derailment DuPont, Washington December 18, 2017 National Transportation Safety Board 490 L’Enfant Plaza, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20594 National Transportation Safety Board. 2019. Amtrak Passenger Train 501 Derailment, DuPont, Washington, December 18, 2017. NTSB/RAR-19/01. Washington, DC. Abstract: On December 18, 2017, at 7:34 a.m. Pacific standard time, southbound Amtrak (National Railroad Passenger Corporation) passenger train 501, consisting of 10 passenger railcars, a power railcar, a baggage railcar, and a locomotive at either end, derailed from a bridge near DuPont, Washington. When the train derailed, it was on its first revenue service run on a single main track (Lakewood Subdivision) at milepost 19.86. There was one run for special guests the week before the accident. Several passenger railcars fell onto Interstate 5 and hit multiple highway vehicles. At the time of the accident, 77 passengers, 5 Amtrak employees, and a Talgo, Inc., technician were on the train. Of these individuals, 3 passengers were killed, and 57 passengers and crewmembers were injured. Additionally, 8 individuals in highway vehicles were injured. The damage is estimated to be more than $25.8 million. The accident investigation focused on the following issues: individual agency responsibilities in preparation for inaugural service, multiagency participation in preparation for inaugural service, Amtrak safety on a host railroad, implementation of positive train control, training and qualifying operating crews, crashworthiness of the Talgo equipment, survival factors and emergency design of equipment, and multiagency emergency response.
  • Relieving Rail Congestion >> Point Defiance Bypass More Frequent, Reliable and Faster Amtrak Cascades® Service Point Defiance Bypass Project

    Relieving Rail Congestion >> Point Defiance Bypass More Frequent, Reliable and Faster Amtrak Cascades® Service Point Defiance Bypass Project

    Relieving rail congestion >> Point Defiance Bypass More frequent, reliable and faster Amtrak Cascades® service Point Defiance Bypass Project Freight congestion, tight curves, landslides, single-track tunnels and drawbridge openings all cause delays for Amtrak Cascades trains. For passengers, this means missed connections, missed appointments and lost time with family and friends. The inland passenger rail route will create room for Amtrak Cascades to add more daily trains, shorten travel time and reduce delays. Project information www.wsdot.wa.gov/projects/ rail/pnwrc_ptdefiance Cascades High-Speed Rail program information http://wsdot.wa.gov/rail Train schedules & tickets www.amtrakcascades.com >> Better reliability >> More daily trains >> Shorter trips POINT DEFIANCE BYPASS PROJECT Point Defiance Where is the project? N Federal Way 13-03-0001765 16 The Point Defiance Bypass rail project © 2006 - 2011 TomTom 509 99 will reroute passenger trains from the BNSF Railway main line that runs near Tacoma Point Defiance to an existing rail line that runs through south Tacoma, Lakewood, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, and DuPont. 5 Why reroute the train away Puyallup Steilacoom from the scenic waterfront? Lakewood 512 It’s hard to dispute the beauty of the scenic 7 waterfront route around Point Defiance, Legend but that train route is congested with DuPont nearly 50 daily freight trains and is prone WSDOT Project Area to landslides and other disruptions. Current Route Sound Transit 5 Improvements The details The investment Your input is important. • Construction of 14.5 miles of Washington state is delivering nearly new and upgraded track through $800 million in federally funded rail For information on upcoming public Lakewood and DuPont corridor improvements using high- meetings and other ways to provide speed rail grants administered by comments, visit: www.wsdot.wa.gov/ • Five reconstructed at-grade the Federal Railroad Administration.
  • Rail Lines in Thurston County and Surrounding Areas WORKING DRAFT - DECEMBER 2004

    Rail Lines in Thurston County and Surrounding Areas WORKING DRAFT - DECEMBER 2004

    Appendix A Map of Rail Lines in Thurston County and Surrounding Areas Rail Lines in Thurston County and Surrounding Areas WORKING DRAFT - DECEMBER 2004 DRAFT This map is a working draft. Thurston Regional Planning Council is in the process of verifying its contents. All data is subject to change. Rail line ownership and status have not been verified. Rail line locations have been adjusted to match 2002 aerial photos inside Thurston County. Data outside Thurston County was received from each county’s GIS department and the Washington State Department of Transportation. For a copy of the most current map, please contact 5 Thurston Regional Planning Council at (360) 786-5480. ST7 ST101 A 5 ST507 F ST8 ST101 B C Burlington Northern Santa Fe City of Yelm 510 ST7 ST Fort Lewis Port of Olympia Puget Sound & Pacific 5 A 702 D ST Sound Transit Tacoma Rail E Union Pacific Still determining status ST507 Historic D Trail Proposed Trail ST12 • City Limits Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) Indian Reservations Miles 0 1 2 4 6 8 10 Trails along former Rail Right-of-Way in Thurston County !(A Chehalis Western Trail !(D Yelm-to-Tenino Trail !(B Woodland Trail !(E Gate-to-Belmore Trail (future) !(C Lacey Trail (future) !(F Trail along West Bay (future) DISCLAIMER: This map is for general planning purposes only. Thurston Regional Planning Council makes no representations as to the accuracy or fitness of the information for a particular purpose. P:\Transportation\Rail\Rail_Plan\Maps_Images\Rail_11x17_12-13-04 Appendix B Glossary Glossary Active Warning Device A flashing light and/or gate used at grade crossings.
  • Cascades High Speed Rail Program

    Cascades High Speed Rail Program

    Cascades High Speed Rail Program Scott Witt Director State Rail and Marine Office Paula Hammond Steve Reinmuth Secretary of Transportation Chief of Staff Cascadia Institute Vancouver, BC June 9, 2010 Program Vision • Establish a dedicated high-speed track with trains operating at up to 150mph, with 13 daily round trips between Seattle and Portland. o Currently, Amtrak Cascades operates four daily round trips between Seattle and Portland at speeds up to 79 mph. • Strategy: o Employ a cost-effective, step-by-step approach o Focus investments on projects that produce immediate benefits, while laying the groundwork for the future. Service and Ridership New ridership record for Amtrak Cascades in first quarter of 2010 • Increase of nearly 34,000 riders over 2009, making it the largest first quarter ridership since 1994. • In February, ridership soared to 60,745 for the month for an amazing 34 percent increase over 2009. • Growth due largely to the 2010 Olympic Games held in Vancouver, B.C. • March recorded the highest ridership for the quarter at 67,039−an 11 percent increase over 2009. Second train service to Vancouver, B.C. • The second Amtrak Cascades train service to Vancouver, BC continues to grow. o A total of 35,580 passengers rode the second Amtrak Cascades train between August 2009 and April 2010. o A total of 18,748 originated from Vancouver B.C. and 16,832 ended their trip in Vancouver. o Total ridership during the 2010 Olympics for both trains (February 11-March 1) was 11,403. o A total of 16 trains completely sold out during this time.