DOCSLIB.ORG

Assessment of Point Defiance Bypass for High-Speed Intercity Passenger Rail

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Assessment of Point Defiance Bypass for High-Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Assessment of Point Defiance Bypass for High-Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Carter Danne, PE, PTOE Abstract This paper provides a synopsis of the assessment of high-speed intercity passenger rail improvements for the Point Defiance Bypass project and lessons learned from the assessment. Passenger rail has less of a carbon footprint than travel by airplane or standard automobile and in that aspect is a more sustainable mode of transportation. As the lead federal agency, the Federal Railroad Administration granted funds to the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) to improve the Pacific Northwest Rail Corridor where Amtrak currently provides high-speed intercity passenger rail service. The existing service travels along Puget Sound around Point Defiance in Pierce County, where it encounters some operational limitations. In response to these limitations, WSDOT identified an alternate route to improve service that bypasses Point Defiance and travels inland on an existing rail alignment. The author has summarized the highlights of the alternative’s effects on the transportation system. Of particular interest was how a relatively infrequent train crossing event, affected the system both for the short period of time during the crossing and after when queues clear as well as the overall peak hour. Effects on safety were also considered for the existing and alternative alignments; using collision prediction to illustrate the relative safety with the project. Additionally, in preparing the project report and presenting the findings, several lessons were learned. The author has summarized these lessons to share the knowledge gained. In particular, specific lessons are included about the analysis and communication of complex project information. INTRODUCTION This paper provides a synopsis of the assessment of high-speed intercity passenger rail improvements for the Point Defiance Bypass project completed by Parametrix for the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). Additionally, lessons learned from preparing the assessment have been included in this paper. Passenger rail has less of a carbon footprint than travel by airplane or standard automobile and in that aspect is a more sustainable mode of transportation. As the lead federal agency, the Federal Railroad Administration granted funds to the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) to improve the Pacific Northwest Rail Corridor where Amtrak currently provides high-speed intercity passenger rail service. The existing service travels along Puget Sound around Point Defiance in Pierce County, where it encounters some operational limitations. In response to these limitations, WSDOT identified an alternate route (hereafter referred to as the Bypass Route) to improve service that bypasses Point Defiance and travels inland on an existing rail alignment approximately 21 miles long. Exhibit 1 shows the alignment for the Bypass Route (the Build Alternative) as well as the Point Defiance Route (the Existing Alignment (No Action Alternative)). Along the Bypass Route, the Point Defiance Bypass project will improve railroad tracks, crossings, and support facilities at various locations (including constructing a new second track adjacent to an existing main line between South Tacoma and Lakewood), and relocate the existing Tacoma Amtrak Station. Exhibit 2 shows the at-grade railroad crossings and station locations along the Bypass Route. With the Bypass Route operational, Amtrak would shift its Cascades and Coast Starlight service to the Bypass Route and as a result fourteen more daily train trips would travel through the crossings shown on Exhibit 2 than would otherwise occur. The weekday AM and PM peak hours would contain one additional train trip. STREET SYSTEM EFFECTS A transportation discipline report was prepared in support of the Point Defiance Bypass Project Environmental Assessment. The effects on the street systems were summarized using a few different measures: Level of Service and Intersection Delay: These measures were primarily used to measure project effects against local agency standards for level of service conditions. Queuing: Maximum queues were used in an effort to more specifically illustrate the effects of train crossing events in the peak hours. Railroad Crossing Safety: The predicted accident recurrence intervals for the corridor were used to illustrate potential changes in traffic safety. What follows are highlights from the transportation discipline report. Level of Service and Intersection Delay The year 2030 was used as the design year for comparing project effects on study intersections between the No Action Alternative and the proposed Project. Intersection level of service and delay in seconds per vehicle were studied at 47 public street intersections using Trafficware’s Synchro and PTV America’s VISSIM software. Exhibit 1 Proposed Project and No Action Alternative Exhibit 2 At-Grade Crossings and Station Locations The following factors figured prominently into the results documented in the transportation discipline report: Vehicular traffic volumes would remain similar between No Action and Build Alternatives. At one more train per hour, the train traffic increase above the No Action Alternative in the peak hours is small. With the Build Alternative, there will also be improvements to the railroad crossings and signal systems to accommodate the proposed changes. Exhibit 3 below summarizes the conclusions from the intersection LOS and delay analysis. Exhibit 3 Conclusions from LOS Analysis Quantity of Intersections Intersection Effect AM PM Peak Peak Hour Hour Slight to No Noticeable Effect 43 41 (Delay change of 5 seconds or less per vehicle) Improved Functioning 3 3 (Delay improvements of more than 5 seconds per vehicle) Adversely Affected 1 3 (Delay increases greater than five seconds per vehicle) Of the intersections adversely affected, only one operates at a substandard LOS (below LOS D): Thorne Lane SW and Union Avenue SW, which operates at LOS F. However, by examining the system of intersections, the nearby two Thorne Lane SW Interstate 5 ramp intersections experience reduced delays, offsetting the increase in delay at this intersection. Given that the LOS and delay results are based on the traveler’s experience over an hour, maximum queues were also studied in an effort to the depict the specific effects of a train crossing event. Queues In 2030, vehicle queues at study area intersections are anticipated to get slightly longer with the addition of Amtrak Cascades service. Typically, the duration that the roads are blocked by crossing events would be similar to the duration that will be experienced once Sound Transit begins operating commuter rail service between Lakewood and downtown Tacoma. For crossings not near a station, this duration is approximately one minute or less. South of Lakewood, roads would be blocked by crossing events now from both Amtrak and freight service. Overall, the maximum queues would not increase much, and in some instances actually reduce because of signal system improvements. Exhibit 4 summarizes the maximum queues. Exhibit 4 Conclusions from Analysis of Maximum Queues Maximum Queue Lengths Additional Intersections Blocked by Maximum Queues Approximately 2-4 vehicles longer with S. Washington Street & S. 51st Street proposed Project (PM peak hour only) Although one additional intersection would be blocked with the proposed Project, the surrounding street grid provides opportunities for drivers to slightly adjust their routes around this queue. Safety The faster passenger and freight train movements at the crossings on the Bypass Route alignment resulted in the project team looking at potential safety improvements and predicting the anticipated accident frequency with the proposed Project. Crossing Area Improvements with Potential to Improve Safety The following improvements would improve safety and be added by the Build Alternative at several existing at-grade crossings: Do Not Stop On Tracks signs. Wayside horns to provide automated audible warnings directed towards street traffic at a rail/roadway at-grade crossing to forewarn people of an approaching train. Median barriers to physically inhibit vehicles attempting to go around the railroad crossing gates. Sidewalks for an ADA-accessible route over the tracks with tactile strips alerting sight-impaired travelers to changes ahead. Pre-signals to stop vehicles in front of the railroad crossings before the downstream queue begins to back up across the tracks. More advanced signal controllers at the N. Thorne Lane SW, Berkeley Street SW, 41st Division Drive, and Barksdale Avenue crossing areas, which would allow nearby signals to operate in synchronized fashion and lower the likelihood of vehicles being on the tracks during a crossing. Predicted Accident Experience Methodology The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) accident prediction model railroad-highway grade crossings was used to predict the number of accidents for the No Action Alternative and Build Alternative. Applying this model required the following steps to be taken: 1) Gather the most recently available five years of accident data for the railroad- highway grade crossings. This was obtained from the FRA Office of Safety Analysis web page (http://safetydata.fra.dot.gov/OfficeofSafety/) for the existing at-grade railroad crossings in the study area. 2) Input crossing characteristics. The FRA crossing inventory database provided much of this information. This
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sounder Expansion to Dupont
    S-17: Sounder Expansion to DuPont Project Number S-17 PROJECT AREA AND REPRESENTATIVE ALIGNMENT Subarea Pierce Primary Mode Commuter Rail Facility Type Station Length 7.8 miles Version ST Board Workshop Date Last Modified 11-25-2015 SHORT PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project would extend Sounder commuter rail service from Lakewood to Tillicum and DuPont with two new stations. Note: The elements included in this representative project will be refined during future phases of project development and are subject to change. KEY ATTRIBUTES REGIONAL LIGHT No RAIL SPINE Does this project help complete the light rail spine? CAPITAL COST $289 — $309 Cost in Millions of 2014 $ RIDERSHIP 1,000 — 2,000 2040 daily boardings PROJECT ELEMENTS · One at-grade station: Tillicum neighborhood of Lakewood near the intersection of I-5 and Berkeley Avenue SW, sized to accommodate 7-car trains or longer if Projects S-06 or S-07 are implemented · Pedestrian plaza at Tillicum Station · Surface parking at the Tillicum with approximately 125 stalls; the scope of the transit parking components included in this project could be revised to include a range of strategies for providing rider access to the transit facility; along with, or instead of, parking for private vehicles or van pools, a mix of other investments could be accomplished through the budget for this project · One at-grade station: Sound Transit’s existing DuPont Station on Wilmington Drive, just northeast of the intersection of I-5 and Center Drive in DuPont, sized to accommodate 7-car trains or longer if Projects S- 06 or S-07 are implemented · A second mainline track from Bridgeport Way SW to the DuPont Station · One new layover and train storage facility southwest of the proposed DuPont station with a capacity for five trains · Operator welfare building and security equipment · 4 trains in the a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • HQ-2017-1239 Final.Pdf
    Federal Railroad Administration Office of Railroad Safety Accident and Analysis Branch Accident Investigation Report HQ-2017-1239 Amtrak 501 DuPont, Washington December 18, 2017 Note that 49 U.S.C. §20903 provides that no part of an accident or incident report, including this one, made by the Secretary of Transportation/Federal Railroad Administration under 49 U.S.C. §20902 may be used in a civil action for damages resulting from a matter mentioned in the report. U.S. Department of Transportation FRA File #HQ-2017-1239 Federal Railroad Administration FRA FACTUAL RAILROAD ACCIDENT REPORT SYNOPSIS On December 18, 2017, at 7:33 a.m., PST, southbound National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) Passenger Train Number 501 (Train 501) derailed in an 8-degree, 22-minute, left-hand curve at Milepost (MP) 19.86 on the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority, Sounder Commuter Rail (Sound Transit) Lakewood Subdivision, in DuPont, Washington. The lead locomotive and 12 cars derailed, with some sliding down an embankment, and some landing on the southbound lanes of Interstate 5, colliding with several highway vehicles. Train 501 is part of the Amtrak Cascades passenger train service funded by the States of Washington and Oregon. The Cascades passenger train service operates between Vancouver, British Columbia, and Eugene, Oregon, using Talgo, Inc. (Talgo) passenger equipment. DuPont, Washington, is located approximately 18 miles southwest of Tacoma, Washington. Sound Transit is the host railroad to Amtrak on the Lakewood Subdivision, which is approximately 20 miles in length from Tacoma to DuPont. Train 501 was traveling from Seattle, Washington, to Portland, Oregon, over the Point Defiance Bypass track between Tacoma and DuPont.
    [Show full text]
  • Point Defiance Bypass Project Environmental Assessment
    Point Defiance Bypass Project Environmental Assessment Prepared for: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Railroad Administration Prepared by: For more information you can: Call the WSDOT Rail Office at (360) 705-7900 Write to the WSDOT Rail Office at WSDOT Rail Office, P.O. Box 47407 Olympia, WA 98504-7407 Fax your comments to (360) 705-6821 E-mail your comments to [email protected] Title VI Notice to Public It is the Washington State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) policy to assure that no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin or sex, as provided by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise discriminated against under any of its federally funded programs and activities. Any person who believes his/her Title VI protection has been violated may file a complaint with WSDOT's Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO). For Title VI complaint forms and advice, please contact OEO’s Title VI Coordinators, George Laue at (509) 324-6018 or Jonte' Sulton at (360) 705-7082. Persons with disabilities may request this information be prepared and supplied in alternate forms by calling the WSDOT ADA Accommodations Hotline collect at (206) 389-2839. Persons with vision or hearing impairments may access the WA State Telecommunications Relay Service at TT 1-800-833-6388, Tele-Braille at 1-800-833-6385, or voice at 1-800-833- 6384, and ask to be connected to (360) 705-7097. Point Defiance Bypass Project Environmental Assessment Submitted pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Amtrak Cascades Train 501 Derailment - Dec
    Amtrak Cascades Train 501 Derailment - Dec. 18, 2017 Last Updated: Dec. 18, 2017 at 3 p.m. ET Where did the derailment of Amtrak Cascades Train 501 occur? The derailment occurred in DuPont, Wash., where the railroad crosses I-5 southwest of the Eagles Pride Golf Course – at railroad milepost 19.79. The railroad bridge crosses the highway just west of where Mounts Rd SW and Nisqually Rd SW meet and also cross I-5. What time did the derailment occur? It occurred at approximately 7:34 a.m. Pacific Time. Who owns the tracks where the derailment occurred? The track where the derailment occurred – known as the Point Defiance Bypass – is owned by Sound Transit, which also operates over a portion of it. BNSF dispatches trains over the bypass. What was the consist of Train 501? Amtrak Cascades Train 501 consisted of two locomotives – a Charger diesel locomotive and a P- 42 – as well as 12 passenger cars. The latter included Business class and Coach cars and a Bistro food service car. A standard Talgo coach car contains approximately 36 seats. The Talgo trainset and Charger locomotive involved in the derailment are owned by WSDOT. How many passengers and Amtrak staff were onboard Train 501 when it derailed? There were approximately 80 customers onboard, five Amtrak crew members, and one Talgo technician. What is the Point Defiance Bypass Project? 1 On the map above, orange indicates the bypass, while green is the BNSF route along Puget Sound used by Amtrak Cascades trains through Dec. 17, 2017. Service via the bypass began on Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Report Sounder Program
    Progress Report Sounder Program The Tacoma Trestle construction contractor’s crane was used to move formwork and rebar for the south platform June | 2017 Prepared by Project Control l Design, Engineering & Construction Management June 2017 Page 105 of 142 Sounder Commuter Rail Program Overview Sounder provides commuter rail service between Everett and Lakewood June 2017 Page 106 of 142 Sounder Commuter Rail Program Overview Projects Below is a summary description for each active project under the Sounder Commuter Rail Capital Program. Project status information can be found on the following projects pages. Auburn Station Access Improvements: Project includes alternatives identification, screening, environmental documentation, design and construction of station access improvements at or around Auburn Station. The purpose of the project is to improve access to the existing Sounder Auburn Station for Sounder riders, bicyclists, bus riders, and drivers. Kent Station Access Improvements: Project includes alternatives identification, screening, environmental documentation, design and construction of station access improvements at or around Kent Station. The purpose of the project is to improve access to the existing Sounder Kent Station for Sounder riders, bicyclists, bus riders, and drivers. Mukilteo Station, South Platform: Full build-out of this station included construction of a second platform, overhead pedestrian bridge, elevators, stair tower, and passenger shelters. Sounder service at the south platform began on April 11, 2016. The
    [Show full text]
  • National Transportation Safety Board Investigative Hearing
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 06/15/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-12846, and on FDsys.gov BILLING CODE: 7533-01-P National Transportation Safety Board Investigative Hearing Two recent Amtrak (National Railroad Passenger Corporation) accidents have motivated this investigative hearing: first, an Amtrak overspeed derailment in a 30 mph curve that occurred in DuPont, Washington, and, second, an Amtrak head-on collision with a standing freight train in Cayce, South Carolina. The first accident occurred on December 18, 2017, at 7:33 a.m., Pacific standard time, and involved southbound Amtrak passenger train 501, consisting of a leading and trailing locomotive, a power car, 10 passenger railcars, and a luggage car. Train 501 was traveling at 78 mph when it derailed from a highway overpass near DuPont, Washington. The train was on its first regular passenger service trip on a single main track (Lakewood subdivision) at milepost (MP) 19.86. The lead locomotive, the power car, and two passenger railcars derailed onto Interstate 5. Fourteen highway vehicles came into contact with the derailed equipment. At the time of the accident, 77 passengers, 5 Amtrak employees, and a Talgo Incorporated technician were on the train.1 Of these individuals, 3 passengers were killed and 62 passengers and crewmembers were injured. Eight individuals in highway vehicles were also injured. The damage is estimated to be more than $40 million. At the time of the accident, the temperature was 48°F, the wind was from the south at 9 mph, and the visibility was 10 miles in light rain.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Note Package 58909
    Multiple Agency Fiscal Note Summary Bill Number: 6321 SB Title: NTSB recommend. compliance Estimated Cash Receipts NONE Local Gov. Courts Loc School dist-SPI Local Gov. Other No fiscal impact Local Gov. Total Estimated Operating Expenditures Agency Name 2019-21 2021-23 2023-25 FTEs GF-State Total FTEs GF-State Total FTEs GF-State Total Utilities and .9 0 443,936 .0 0 0 .0 0 0 Transportation Commission Department of Non-zero but indeterminate cost and/or savings. Please see discussion. Transportation Total $ 0.9 0 443,936 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 Local Gov. Courts Loc School dist-SPI Local Gov. Other No fiscal impact Local Gov. Total Estimated Capital Budget Expenditures Agency Name 2019-21 2021-23 2023-25 FTEs Bonds Total FTEs Bonds Total FTEs Bonds Total Utilities and .0 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 0 Transportation Commission Department of .0 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 0 Transportation Total $ 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 Estimated Capital Budget Breakout Prepared by: Jenna Forty, OFM Phone: Date Published: (360) 902-0419 Final 1/27/2020 FNPID: 58909 FNS029 Multi Agency rollup Individual State Agency Fiscal Note Bill Number: 6321 SB Title: NTSB recommend. compliance Agency: 215-Utilities and Transportation Commission Part I: Estimates No Fiscal Impact Estimated Cash Receipts to: NONE Estimated Operating Expenditures from: FY 2020 FY 2021 2019-21 2021-23 2023-25 FTE Staff Years 1.2 0.6 0.9 0.0 0.0 Account Public Service Revolving 345,730 98,206 443,936 0 0 Account-State 111-1 Total $ 345,730 98,206 443,936 0 0 Estimated Capital Budget Impact: NONE The cash receipts and expenditure estimates on this page represent the most likely fiscal impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Intercity Passenger Rail Service in the United States
    Improving Intercity Passenger Rail Service in the United States Updated February 8, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45783 SUMMARY R45783 Improving Intercity Passenger Rail Service February 8, 2021 in the United States Ben Goldman The federal government has been involved in preserving and improving passenger rail service Analyst in Transportation since 1970, when the bankruptcies of several major railroads threatened the continuance of Policy passenger trains. Congress responded by creating Amtrak—officially, the National Railroad Passenger Corporation—to preserve a basic level of intercity passenger rail service, while relieving private railroad companies of the obligation to maintain a business that had lost money for decades. In the years since, the federal government has funded Amtrak and, in recent years, has funded passenger-rail efforts of varying size and complexity through grants, loans, and tax subsidies. Most recently, Congress has attempted to manage the effects on passenger rail brought about by the sudden drop in travel demand due to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Amtrak’s ridership and revenue growth trends were suddenly upended, and passenger rail service in many markets was either reduced or suspended. Efforts to improve intercity passenger rail can be broadly grouped into two categories: incremental improvement of existing services operated by Amtrak and implementation of new rail service where none currently exists. Efforts have been focused on identifying corridors where passenger rail travel times would be competitive with driving or flying (generally less than 500 miles long) and where population density and intercity travel demand create favorable conditions for rail service.
    [Show full text]
  • Amtrak Passenger Train 501 Derailment Dupont, Washington December 18, 2017
    Amtrak Passenger Train 501 Derailment DuPont, Washington December 18, 2017 Accident Report NTSB/RAR-19/01 PB2019-100807 National Transportation Safety Board NTSB/RAR-19/01 PB2019-100807 Notation 58913 Report Date: May 21, 2019 Railroad Accident Report Amtrak Passenger Train 501 Derailment DuPont, Washington December 18, 2017 National Transportation Safety Board 490 L’Enfant Plaza, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20594 National Transportation Safety Board. 2019. Amtrak Passenger Train 501 Derailment, DuPont, Washington, December 18, 2017. NTSB/RAR-19/01. Washington, DC. Abstract: On December 18, 2017, at 7:34 a.m. Pacific standard time, southbound Amtrak (National Railroad Passenger Corporation) passenger train 501, consisting of 10 passenger railcars, a power railcar, a baggage railcar, and a locomotive at either end, derailed from a bridge near DuPont, Washington. When the train derailed, it was on its first revenue service run on a single main track (Lakewood Subdivision) at milepost 19.86. There was one run for special guests the week before the accident. Several passenger railcars fell onto Interstate 5 and hit multiple highway vehicles. At the time of the accident, 77 passengers, 5 Amtrak employees, and a Talgo, Inc., technician were on the train. Of these individuals, 3 passengers were killed, and 57 passengers and crewmembers were injured. Additionally, 8 individuals in highway vehicles were injured. The damage is estimated to be more than $25.8 million. The accident investigation focused on the following issues: individual agency responsibilities in preparation for inaugural service, multiagency participation in preparation for inaugural service, Amtrak safety on a host railroad, implementation of positive train control, training and qualifying operating crews, crashworthiness of the Talgo equipment, survival factors and emergency design of equipment, and multiagency emergency response.
    [Show full text]
  • Relieving Rail Congestion >> Point Defiance Bypass More Frequent, Reliable and Faster Amtrak Cascades® Service Point Defiance Bypass Project
    Relieving rail congestion >> Point Defiance Bypass More frequent, reliable and faster Amtrak Cascades® service Point Defiance Bypass Project Freight congestion, tight curves, landslides, single-track tunnels and drawbridge openings all cause delays for Amtrak Cascades trains. For passengers, this means missed connections, missed appointments and lost time with family and friends. The inland passenger rail route will create room for Amtrak Cascades to add more daily trains, shorten travel time and reduce delays. Project information www.wsdot.wa.gov/projects/ rail/pnwrc_ptdefiance Cascades High-Speed Rail program information http://wsdot.wa.gov/rail Train schedules & tickets www.amtrakcascades.com >> Better reliability >> More daily trains >> Shorter trips POINT DEFIANCE BYPASS PROJECT Point Defiance Where is the project? N Federal Way 13-03-0001765 16 The Point Defiance Bypass rail project © 2006 - 2011 TomTom 509 99 will reroute passenger trains from the BNSF Railway main line that runs near Tacoma Point Defiance to an existing rail line that runs through south Tacoma, Lakewood, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, and DuPont. 5 Why reroute the train away Puyallup Steilacoom from the scenic waterfront? Lakewood 512 It’s hard to dispute the beauty of the scenic 7 waterfront route around Point Defiance, Legend but that train route is congested with DuPont nearly 50 daily freight trains and is prone WSDOT Project Area to landslides and other disruptions. Current Route Sound Transit 5 Improvements The details The investment Your input is important. • Construction of 14.5 miles of Washington state is delivering nearly new and upgraded track through $800 million in federally funded rail For information on upcoming public Lakewood and DuPont corridor improvements using high- meetings and other ways to provide speed rail grants administered by comments, visit: www.wsdot.wa.gov/ • Five reconstructed at-grade the Federal Railroad Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Lines in Thurston County and Surrounding Areas WORKING DRAFT - DECEMBER 2004
    Appendix A Map of Rail Lines in Thurston County and Surrounding Areas Rail Lines in Thurston County and Surrounding Areas WORKING DRAFT - DECEMBER 2004 DRAFT This map is a working draft. Thurston Regional Planning Council is in the process of verifying its contents. All data is subject to change. Rail line ownership and status have not been verified. Rail line locations have been adjusted to match 2002 aerial photos inside Thurston County. Data outside Thurston County was received from each county’s GIS department and the Washington State Department of Transportation. For a copy of the most current map, please contact 5 Thurston Regional Planning Council at (360) 786-5480. ST7 ST101 A 5 ST507 F ST8 ST101 B C Burlington Northern Santa Fe City of Yelm 510 ST7 ST Fort Lewis Port of Olympia Puget Sound & Pacific 5 A 702 D ST Sound Transit Tacoma Rail E Union Pacific Still determining status ST507 Historic D Trail Proposed Trail ST12 • City Limits Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) Indian Reservations Miles 0 1 2 4 6 8 10 Trails along former Rail Right-of-Way in Thurston County !(A Chehalis Western Trail !(D Yelm-to-Tenino Trail !(B Woodland Trail !(E Gate-to-Belmore Trail (future) !(C Lacey Trail (future) !(F Trail along West Bay (future) DISCLAIMER: This map is for general planning purposes only. Thurston Regional Planning Council makes no representations as to the accuracy or fitness of the information for a particular purpose. P:\Transportation\Rail\Rail_Plan\Maps_Images\Rail_11x17_12-13-04 Appendix B Glossary Glossary Active Warning Device A flashing light and/or gate used at grade crossings.
    [Show full text]
  • Cascades High Speed Rail Program
    Cascades High Speed Rail Program Scott Witt Director State Rail and Marine Office Paula Hammond Steve Reinmuth Secretary of Transportation Chief of Staff Cascadia Institute Vancouver, BC June 9, 2010 Program Vision • Establish a dedicated high-speed track with trains operating at up to 150mph, with 13 daily round trips between Seattle and Portland. o Currently, Amtrak Cascades operates four daily round trips between Seattle and Portland at speeds up to 79 mph. • Strategy: o Employ a cost-effective, step-by-step approach o Focus investments on projects that produce immediate benefits, while laying the groundwork for the future. Service and Ridership New ridership record for Amtrak Cascades in first quarter of 2010 • Increase of nearly 34,000 riders over 2009, making it the largest first quarter ridership since 1994. • In February, ridership soared to 60,745 for the month for an amazing 34 percent increase over 2009. • Growth due largely to the 2010 Olympic Games held in Vancouver, B.C. • March recorded the highest ridership for the quarter at 67,039−an 11 percent increase over 2009. Second train service to Vancouver, B.C. • The second Amtrak Cascades train service to Vancouver, BC continues to grow. o A total of 35,580 passengers rode the second Amtrak Cascades train between August 2009 and April 2010. o A total of 18,748 originated from Vancouver B.C. and 16,832 ended their trip in Vancouver. o Total ridership during the 2010 Olympics for both trains (February 11-March 1) was 11,403. o A total of 16 trains completely sold out during this time.
    [Show full text]