Point Defiance Bypass Project Environmental Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Point Defiance Bypass Project Environmental Assessment Point Defiance Bypass Project Environmental Assessment Prepared for: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Railroad Administration Prepared by: For more information you can: Call the WSDOT Rail Office at (360) 705-7900 Write to the WSDOT Rail Office at WSDOT Rail Office, P.O. Box 47407 Olympia, WA 98504-7407 Fax your comments to (360) 705-6821 E-mail your comments to [email protected] Title VI Notice to Public It is the Washington State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) policy to assure that no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin or sex, as provided by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise discriminated against under any of its federally funded programs and activities. Any person who believes his/her Title VI protection has been violated may file a complaint with WSDOT's Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO). For Title VI complaint forms and advice, please contact OEO’s Title VI Coordinators, George Laue at (509) 324-6018 or Jonte' Sulton at (360) 705-7082. Persons with disabilities may request this information be prepared and supplied in alternate forms by calling the WSDOT ADA Accommodations Hotline collect at (206) 389-2839. Persons with vision or hearing impairments may access the WA State Telecommunications Relay Service at TT 1-800-833-6388, Tele-Braille at 1-800-833-6385, or voice at 1-800-833- 6384, and ask to be connected to (360) 705-7097. Point Defiance Bypass Project Environmental Assessment Submitted pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) Prepared for: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Railroad Administration Prepared by: Washington State Department of Transportation February 22, 2013 Date of Approval Megan White, P.E. Director, Environmental Services Office Washington State Department of Transportation Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................. 1‐1 1.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1‐1 1.2 Project Area Description .................................................................................................................... 1‐1 2.0 PURPOSE AND NEED .................................................................................................................................... 2‐1 2.1 Purpose of the Project ........................................................................................................................ 2‐1 2.2 Need for the Project ............................................................................................................................ 2‐1 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................................................... 3‐1 3.1 No Build Alternative ............................................................................................................................ 3‐1 3.2 Build Alternative .................................................................................................................................. 3‐2 3.2.1 Construct New Track Adjacent to the Existing Main Line ............................................................... 3‐2 3.2.2 Reconstruct and Rehabilitate the Existing Main Line ...................................................................... 3‐4 3.2.3 Improvements at Grade Crossings .................................................................................................. 3‐4 3.2.4 Tacoma Amtrak Station Relocation ................................................................................................. 3‐4 3.2.5 Operational Changes ....................................................................................................................... 3‐6 3.3 Laws, Regulations, and Permits ........................................................................................................ 3‐6 4.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ............................................................... 4‐1 4.1 Air Quality ............................................................................................................................................. 4‐1 4.1.1 Study Area and Methodology – Air Quality ..................................................................................... 4‐1 4.1.2 Affected Environment – Air Quality ................................................................................................ 4‐2 4.1.3 Environmental Consequences – Air Quality .................................................................................... 4‐2 4.1.4 Minimization Measures – Air Quality .............................................................................................. 4‐3 4.2 Noise and Vibration ............................................................................................................................ 4‐4 4.2.1 Study Area and Methodology – Noise and Vibration ...................................................................... 4‐4 4.2.2 Affected Environment – Noise and Vibration .................................................................................. 4‐6 4.2.3 Environmental Consequences – Noise and Vibration ..................................................................... 4‐9 Point Defiance Bypass Project February 2013 Environmental Assessment Page i 4.2.4 Minimization Measures – Noise and Vibration ............................................................................. 4‐11 4.3 Transportation .................................................................................................................................. 4‐11 4.3.1 Study Area and Methodology – Transportation ............................................................................ 4‐11 4.3.2 Affected Environment – Transportation ....................................................................................... 4‐12 4.3.3 Environmental Consequences – Transportation ........................................................................... 4‐14 4.3.4 Minimization Measures – Transportation ..................................................................................... 4‐18 4.4 Geology and Soils.............................................................................................................................. 4‐18 4.4.1 Study Area and Methodology – Geology and Soils ....................................................................... 4‐18 4.4.2 Affected Environment – Geology and Soils ................................................................................... 4‐19 4.4.3 Environmental Consequences – Geology and Soils ....................................................................... 4‐19 4.4.4 Minimization Measures – Geology and Soils ................................................................................. 4‐20 4.5 Water Resources ............................................................................................................................... 4‐20 4.5.1 Study Area and Methodology – Water Resources ........................................................................ 4‐20 4.5.2 Affected Environment – Water Resources .................................................................................... 4‐21 4.5.3 Environmental Consequences – Water Resources ........................................................................ 4‐23 4.5.4 Minimization Measures – Water Resources .................................................................................. 4‐23 4.6 Wetlands ............................................................................................................................................ 4‐23 4.6.1 Study Area and Methodology – Wetlands .................................................................................... 4‐23 4.6.2 Affected Environment – Wetlands ................................................................................................ 4‐24 4.6.3 Environmental Consequences – Wetlands .................................................................................... 4‐24 4.6.4 Minimization Measures – Wetlands .............................................................................................. 4‐25 4.7 Fish, Vegetation, and Wildlife ........................................................................................................ 4‐25 4.7.1 Study Area and Methodology – Fish, Vegetation, and Wildlife ..................................................... 4‐25 4.7.2 Affected Environment – Fish, Vegetation, and Wildlife ................................................................ 4‐25 4.7.3 Environmental Consequences – Fish, Vegetation, and Wildlife .................................................... 4‐27 4.7.4 Minimization Measures – Fish, Vegetation, and Wildlife .............................................................. 4‐27 February 2013 Point Defiance Bypass Project Page ii Environmental Assessment 4.8 Hazardous Materials ........................................................................................................................ 4‐28 4.8.1 Study Area and Methodology – Hazardous Materials ................................................................... 4‐28 4.8.2 Affected Environment – Hazardous Materials .............................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Sound Transit 4
    1 of 16 Funding Application Competition Regional FTA Application Type Main Competition Status submitted Submitted: April 27th, 2020 4:27 PM Prepopulated with screening form? No Project Information 1. Project Title South Tacoma & Lakewood Station Access Improvements 2. Regional Transportation Plan ID 4086, 4085 3. Sponsoring Agency Sound Transit 4. Cosponsors N/A 5. Does the sponsoring agency have "Certification Acceptance" status from WSDOT? N/A 6. If not, which agency will serve as your CA sponsor? N/A 7. Is your agency a designated recipient for FTA funds? Yes 8. Designated recipient concurrence N/A Contact Information 1. Contact name Tyler Benson 2. Contact phone 206-903-7372 3. Contact email [email protected] Project Description 1. Project Scope This Project will complete preliminary engineering and NEPA environmental review for station access improvements at the South Tacoma and Lakewood Sounder stations. These improvements will include, but not limited to, sidewalks, pedestrian and bicycle improvements, lighting and other station area enhancements to improve safety and accessibility for transit riders and the community. The work will also include analyzing transit use around the stations to inform integration of multi-modal improvements and evaluation of parking improvement options at the stations. The scope also includes the development and implementation of an external engagement strategy, including public engagement activities for targeted outreach to underserved communities in the project area. Sound Transit and the cities of Lakewood and Tacoma will identify the infrastructure needs in and around each station that are most critical to removing barriers, improving safety, promoting TOD and improving access to station-area communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Operation Lifesaver Executive Committee Meeting
    Freighthouse Square – Dome District Development Group DRAFT Meeting Summary Date: December 9, 2013 Time: 4:30 p.m. to approximately 6:00 p.m. Location: Freighthouse Square (FHS), West End Present: City of Tacoma: Ian Munce, Robert Thoms, Don Erickson WSDOT Rail Office: David Smelser, Carol Lee Roalkvam, Jason Biggs, Frank Davidson Sound Transit: Eric Beckman Freighthouse Square Owner: Bryan Borgelt VIA Architects: Mahlon Clements, Trey West Dome District Development Group: Janice McNeil, Jori Adkins, Rick Semple New Tacoma Neighborhood Council: Elizabeth Burris AIA SWW: Ko Wibow, Aaron Winston Coalition for Active Transportation: (?) Tacoma News Tribune: Peter Callahan, Kate Martin Others (3) ______________________________________________________________________________ The following is a draft summary of this meeting. Please send any suggested revisions or clarifications to Frank Davidson at [email protected] 1. Introductions • Ian Munce called the group to order. • Janice McNeil, President of the Dome District Development Group, introduced herself and asked that everyone introduce themselves. 2. Project Overview and FRA Review • David Smelser thanked the group for gathering for an update on the Tacoma Station Relocation portion of the Point Defiance Bypass project and recent developments with the station. He gave a brief overview of the Point Defiance Bypass project, which is one of multiple projects funded through a grant administered by the Federal Rail Administration (FRA). • Ian Munce asked David to start with a status of discussions on the platform between C and D Streets for Freighthouse Square (FHS) and parking, as he said this was the impetus for convening the Dome District Advisory Group in the first place. o David reviewed the original concept as presented in the Environmental Assessment (EA) and the Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI).
    [Show full text]
  • Staff Report on 2021 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket List
    A G E N D A PLANNING COMMISSION Connie Coleman-Lacadie Don Daniels Nancy Hudson-Echols Ryan Pearson James Guerrero Paul Wagemann Meeting Wednesday, September 16, 2020 COVID-19 Meeting Notice The Planning Commission will hold its scheduled meetings to ensure essential city functions continue. However, due to Governor Inslee’s Emergency Proclamation 20-28.9, issued on August 27, 2020 and in effect through October 1, 2020, is extended, in-person attendance by members of the public in the Council Chambers at 6000 Main St. SW, Lakewood, WA will not be permitted on September 16, 2020. Until further notice, residents can virtually attend Planning Commission meetings by watching them live on the city’s YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/cityoflakewoodwa. Those who do not have access to YouTube can call in to listen by telephone at +1 (253) 215- 8782 and by entering Webinar ID: 81761606860#. To participate in Public Comment and/or Public Hearing Testimony: Public Comments and Public Hearing Testimony will be accepted by mail, email or by live virtual comment. Send comments by mail or email to Karen Devereaux, Planning Commission Clerk, at [email protected] or 6000 Main Street SW Lakewood, WA 98499. Comments received up to one hour before the meeting will be provided to the Planning Commission electronically. Live Public Participation: To provide live Public Comments or Public Hearing Testimony during the meeting, join the Zoom meeting as an attendee by calling by telephone Dial +1(253) 215- 8782 and enter participant ID: 81761606860# or by going online at https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81761606860.
    [Show full text]
  • CASCADES Train Time Schedule & Line Route
    CASCADES train time schedule & line map CASCADES Eugene Station View In Website Mode The CASCADES train line (Eugene Station) has 3 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Eugene Station: 7:25 AM - 2:20 PM (2) King Street Station (Seattle): 5:30 AM - 4:40 PM (3) Union Station (Portland): 6:10 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest CASCADES train station near you and ƒnd out when is the next CASCADES train arriving. Direction: Eugene Station CASCADES train Time Schedule 12 stops Eugene Station Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 7:25 AM - 2:20 PM Monday 7:25 AM - 2:20 PM King Street Station South Weller Street Overpass, Seattle Tuesday 7:25 AM - 2:20 PM Tukwila Station Wednesday 7:25 AM - 2:20 PM Tacoma Station Thursday 7:25 AM - 2:20 PM 1001 Puyallup Avenue, Tacoma Friday 7:25 AM - 2:20 PM Centennial Station (Olympia-Lacey) Saturday 7:25 AM - 2:20 PM 6600 Yelm Hwy Se, Thurston County Centralia Station 210 Railroad Avenue, Centralia CASCADES train Info Kelso Station Direction: Eugene Station 501 1st Avenue South, Kelso Stops: 12 Trip Duration: 380 min Vancouver Station Line Summary: King Street Station, Tukwila Station, 1301 West 11th Street, Vancouver Tacoma Station, Centennial Station (Olympia-Lacey), Centralia Station, Kelso Station, Vancouver Station, Union Station (Portland) Union Station (Portland), Oregon City Station, Salem 800 Northwest 6th Avenue, Portland Staion, Albany Station, Eugene Station Oregon City Station 1757 Washington Street, Oregon City Salem Staion 500 13th St Se, Salem Albany Station
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Financial Plan & Proposed Budget
    2021 Financial Plan & Proposed Budget October 2020 To request accommodations for persons with disabilities or to receive information in alternative formats, please call 1-888-889-6368, TTY Relay 711 or e-mail [email protected] October 2020 CHAIR Kent Keel To: Sound Transit Board of Directors University Place Councilmember From: Peter M. Rogoff, Chief Executive Officer Subject: Proposed Budget for Calendar Year 2021 VICE CHAIRS Dow Constantine None of us began 2020 expecting a pandemic and a recession. This has been King County Executive a year like none other, and we are all humbled by what has taken place and Paul Roberts Everett Councilmember the uncertainty that lies ahead. Nonetheless, with the Board’s guidance we are taking these new realities head-on to ensure that Sound Transit remains a healthy, resilient agency that delivers for the public now and into the BOARD MEMBERS future. Nancy Backus Auburn Mayor At the beginning of the year, we thought our greatest challenge would be David Baker Connect 2020. Through 11 weeks of construction, we created Link’s first Kenmore Mayor branch line, forging the connections from International District/Chinatown Claudia Balducci Station to the Eastside, while keeping all stations open. Our talented and King County Council Chair dedicated staff exemplified our core value of passenger focus, and each Bruce Dammeier Sound Transit staff member at every level of the organization served as an Pierce County Executive Ambassador to assist our riders with navigating the service disruption. Jenny Durkan Seattle Mayor In the early weeks of March as Connect 2020 construction was winding Debora Juarez down, the threat of COVID-19 was rapidly becoming apparent.
    [Show full text]
  • Puyallup Station Parking and Access Improvements
    Summer 2018 Puyallup Station Parking and Access Improvements Project overview Current activities Sound Transit is improving access to Sound Transit is working with the city of Highlights Puyallup Station for drivers, pedestrians, Puyallup to design utilities, stormwater A total of 665 new bicyclists and bus riders, including facilities and street improvements, and is parking spaces construction of a garage adding finalizing property acquisitions. Involvement coming in 2021. approximately 500 new parking spaces, from local communities in fall of 2018 new surface parking with approximately will provide input on the design elements Sidewalk, lighting, 165 spaces, and sidewalk and bicycle for the new garage (what it will look like). and bicycle enhancements. In 2019, Sound Transit will hire a firm to improvements The Sounder South commuter rail line runs design and build the garage. complete by 2023. 13 round trips between Tacoma Dome Have specific questions? and King Street Station in Seattle, eight of which serve South Tacoma and Lakewood. Contact Community Outreach Specialist Sounder also runs special service to select Melanie Mayock, 206-689-4877 or Seahawks, Sounder and Mariners games. [email protected]. The growing popularity of Sounder means Learn more about the project: parking at the current Puyallup lot fills up early every weekday. soundtransit.org/puyallup-access- Map on back improvements. Sound Transit connects more people to more places. 401 S. Jackson St. | Seattle, WA 98104 | 1-800-201-4900 / TTY Relay: 711 | [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Sounder Expansion to Dupont
    S-17: Sounder Expansion to DuPont Project Number S-17 PROJECT AREA AND REPRESENTATIVE ALIGNMENT Subarea Pierce Primary Mode Commuter Rail Facility Type Station Length 7.8 miles Version ST Board Workshop Date Last Modified 11-25-2015 SHORT PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project would extend Sounder commuter rail service from Lakewood to Tillicum and DuPont with two new stations. Note: The elements included in this representative project will be refined during future phases of project development and are subject to change. KEY ATTRIBUTES REGIONAL LIGHT No RAIL SPINE Does this project help complete the light rail spine? CAPITAL COST $289 — $309 Cost in Millions of 2014 $ RIDERSHIP 1,000 — 2,000 2040 daily boardings PROJECT ELEMENTS · One at-grade station: Tillicum neighborhood of Lakewood near the intersection of I-5 and Berkeley Avenue SW, sized to accommodate 7-car trains or longer if Projects S-06 or S-07 are implemented · Pedestrian plaza at Tillicum Station · Surface parking at the Tillicum with approximately 125 stalls; the scope of the transit parking components included in this project could be revised to include a range of strategies for providing rider access to the transit facility; along with, or instead of, parking for private vehicles or van pools, a mix of other investments could be accomplished through the budget for this project · One at-grade station: Sound Transit’s existing DuPont Station on Wilmington Drive, just northeast of the intersection of I-5 and Center Drive in DuPont, sized to accommodate 7-car trains or longer if Projects S- 06 or S-07 are implemented · A second mainline track from Bridgeport Way SW to the DuPont Station · One new layover and train storage facility southwest of the proposed DuPont station with a capacity for five trains · Operator welfare building and security equipment · 4 trains in the a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • HQ-2017-1239 Final.Pdf
    Federal Railroad Administration Office of Railroad Safety Accident and Analysis Branch Accident Investigation Report HQ-2017-1239 Amtrak 501 DuPont, Washington December 18, 2017 Note that 49 U.S.C. §20903 provides that no part of an accident or incident report, including this one, made by the Secretary of Transportation/Federal Railroad Administration under 49 U.S.C. §20902 may be used in a civil action for damages resulting from a matter mentioned in the report. U.S. Department of Transportation FRA File #HQ-2017-1239 Federal Railroad Administration FRA FACTUAL RAILROAD ACCIDENT REPORT SYNOPSIS On December 18, 2017, at 7:33 a.m., PST, southbound National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) Passenger Train Number 501 (Train 501) derailed in an 8-degree, 22-minute, left-hand curve at Milepost (MP) 19.86 on the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority, Sounder Commuter Rail (Sound Transit) Lakewood Subdivision, in DuPont, Washington. The lead locomotive and 12 cars derailed, with some sliding down an embankment, and some landing on the southbound lanes of Interstate 5, colliding with several highway vehicles. Train 501 is part of the Amtrak Cascades passenger train service funded by the States of Washington and Oregon. The Cascades passenger train service operates between Vancouver, British Columbia, and Eugene, Oregon, using Talgo, Inc. (Talgo) passenger equipment. DuPont, Washington, is located approximately 18 miles southwest of Tacoma, Washington. Sound Transit is the host railroad to Amtrak on the Lakewood Subdivision, which is approximately 20 miles in length from Tacoma to DuPont. Train 501 was traveling from Seattle, Washington, to Portland, Oregon, over the Point Defiance Bypass track between Tacoma and DuPont.
    [Show full text]
  • WSDOT Report Template
    Chapter 3 Plan Alternatives 1 What geographic area does the Transportation 2040 plan cover? The central Puget Sound region is made up of King, Kitsap, Pierce, and Snohomish counties, and their 82 cities and towns (refer to Exhibit 3-1). The major metropolitan cities of the region are Seattle and Bellevue in King County, Bremerton in Kitsap County, Tacoma in Pierce County, and Everett in Snohomish County. What is included in the Metropolitan Transportation System (MTS)? 2 What makes up the region’s Metropolitan Transportation System? The MTS promotes facilities and services for carrying out activities The Metropolitan Transportation System (MTS) for the central crucial to the social and economic health of the central Puget Sound Puget Sound region facilitates the movement of people and region. Components of the MTS goods making local, regional, national, and international trips. include: These trips range from traveling to work or school, flying ▪ Roadway system across the country, or shipping Washington-made products ▪ Ferry system overseas. ▪ Transit systems These trips are made using a variety of travel choices. Those ▪ Nonmotorized system choices are key elements of the MTS. ▪ Freight and goods system Roadway System ▪ Intercity passenger rail system ▪ Regional airport system The region has thousands of miles of roadways ranging from ▪ Transportation System interstate highways to residential streets. Roadways are the Management primary means for moving people and goods from one location ▪ Transportation Demand to another in the region and beyond. The interstate system, Management which includes Interstate 5 (I-5), Interstate 405 (I-405), and Exhibit 3-1. Central Puget Sound Region Cities and Towns P:\Graphics\554-2284-010\03\01_04\07\09 Puget Sound Regional Council 3-3 Interstate 90 (I-90), was created to support national commerce and defense needs.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-08-10-Council-Agenda.Pdf
    LAKEWOOD CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION AGENDA Monday, August 10, 2020 City of Lakewood 7:00 P.M. Residents can virtually attend City Council meetings by watching them live on the city’s YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/cityoflakewoodwa Those who do not have access to YouTube can call in to listen by telephone via Zoom: Dial +1(253) 215- 8782 and enter participant ID: 868 7263 2373 ________________________________________________________________ Page No. CALL TO ORDER ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION: (3) 1. Economic Development Update. – (Memorandum) (35) 2. Lakewood Station District Subarea Plan Update. – (Memorandum) (182) 3. Review of Fee Assessment for Public Safety Calls for Service. – (Memorandum) ITEMS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR THE AUGUST 17, 2020 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING: 1. Business Showcase. 2. Port of Tacoma Strategic Plan Update. – Mr. John McCarthy, Commission President 3. Authorizing the execution of an interlocal agreement with the Town of Steilacoom for the provision of Municipal Court, Prosecution, Public Defender and related services. – (Motion – Consent Agenda) 4. Authorizing the execution of an agreement with Saybr Contractors, Inc., in the amount of $101,846, for the Fort Steilacoom Park Pavilion improvement project. – (Motion – Consent Agenda) 5. Authorizing the execution of an agreement with Bruce Dees and Associates, in the amount of $137,001, for the Springbrook Park and Clover Creek improvement project. – (Motion – Consent Agenda) Persons requesting special accommodations or language interpreters should contact the City Clerk, 253-983-7705, as soon as possible in advance of the Council meeting so that an attempt to provide the special accommodations can be made. http://www.cityoflakewood.us Lakewood City Council Agenda -2- August 10, 2020 Page No.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Commission FROM
    TO: Planning Commission FROM: Tiffany Speir, Long Range & Strategic Planning Manager DATE: January 20, 2021 SUBJECT: Lakewood Station District Subarea (LSDS) Plan and Hybrid Form- Based Development Code ATTACHMENTS: Updated draft LSDS Plan, updated draft Hybrid Form-Based Development Code The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the draft LSDS Plan and Hybrid Form- Based Development Code on November 18, 2020. Written public comments were accepted through December 2. The Planning Commission was provided a table summarizing comment received and the City’s responses to public comments in December. Attached hereto are updated drafts of the LSDS Plan and Hybrid Form-Based Code that include edits to respond to received public and Commission comments. Housing Affordability and Resident Displacement Concerns Most public comments and Commission questions centered around housing affordability and risk of displacement for the subarea current residents. The updated Plan has been edited in response to highlight how the City’s planning and codes strive to preserve existing housing and assist residents to find affordable housing, as well as incentivize building affordable housing for developers. Please see Housing, Chapter 3 of the draft Plan. LSDS Legislative Schedule (subject to change): - February 3: Planning Commission action on recommendation to City Council regarding LSDS Plan and Hybrid Form-Based Code; - February 22: City Council starts review of draft LSDS Plan, Development Code and Planned Action; - March 8: Second Council study session;
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Art: Sounder Commuter Rail
    Sounder commuter rail Art adds interest and meaning to public places. Art celebrates the history, culture and people of a community. Art tells a story. The Sound Transit art program, STart, brings an artist’s perspective to what is mainly an engineering and architectural undertaking. Many aspects of the Sound Transit system of buses and trains are transformed by art. Community representatives help select the artists and approve the artwork. ALL STATIONS Artist-designed “Welcome Mats” serve as door markers on the station platforms. The “Welcome Mats” mark where the commuter train doors open when the train pulls into the station. The “Welcome Mat” design was derived from a late 1800’s quilt pattern called “Railroad Quilt.” KING STREET STATION The Sounder station canopy support columns feature 26 stainless steel and aluminum wind-activated sculptures. A series of articulated metal strips hanging from the pivoting vane “Welcome Mats” at a Sounder allows the artwork to not only reveal the direction of the wind but also its shape. “The brushed surface station designed by artist Jerry Mayer of the metal reflects the colors of the sky and the nearby buildings. The metaphor is one of passage, glints of light reflecting from a field of metallic grass.” Artist Ned Kahn. “Moto/motor/to move/motion- that’s the starting point”, says Jerry Mayer of his artwork “Moto,” traffic- type 4’x4’ signs covered in a range of colorful reflective material. These are attached to sixteen columns opposite the commuter rail platform. Each sign/artwork has imagery of a simple black shape made up of a combination of traffic sign symbols from arrows, crosses, “Y”s and “T”s.
    [Show full text]