DOCSLIB.ORG

Architectural Style Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Lexington’s Historic Resources: A Heritage in Architecture 1 Lexington’s Historic Resources: A Heritage in Architecture Architectural Style Guide Compiled from various sources including Mass. Sec’y of State, Architectural Heritage Education field guide (1980) Greater Portland Landmarks, Living with Old Houses (1975) Virginia and Lee McAlester, A Field Guide to American Houses (1993) Lexington Historical Commission Revised 08-18 2 Index of Styles ◦ (a) First Period Houses,1630 – 1730 ……………………………………… 4 ◦ (b) Georgian Style, 1720 - 1780 ……………………………………………. 6 ◦ (c) Federal Style, 1780 – 1830 ………………………………………………. 8 ◦ (d) Greek Revival, 1830 – 1860 ……………………………………………… 10 ◦ (e) Italianate, 1840 – 1880…………………………………………………….. 13 ◦ (f) Gothic Revival, 1840 - 1880 ……………………………………………… 15 ◦ (g) Mansard/Second Empire, 1855 – 1885 ……………………………. 17 ◦ (h) Stick Style, 1870 – 1890 .………………………………………………….. 19 ◦ (i) Shingle Style, 1880 – 1910 ………………………………………………… 21 ◦ (j) Queen Anne, 1875 – 1910 ……………………………………………….. 23 ◦ (k) Romanesque Revival, 1840 -1900 ……………………………………. 25 ◦ (l) Colonial Revival, 1885 – 1910 …………………………………………… 27 ◦ (m) Tudor Revival, 1900 – 1940 ……………………………………………. 30 ◦ (n) Arts & Crafts/Craftsman/Bungalow, 1905 – 1930 ……………. 32 ◦ (o) Dutch Colonial Revival, 1900 – 1940 ……………………………….. 34 ◦ (p) Spanish Colonial Revival/20th Century Eclectic, 1915–1940 36 ◦ (q) “Cape Cod,” 1930 – 1960………………………………………………… 38 ◦ (r) Mid-Century Modern, 1945 – 1970…………………………………… 41 3 First Period Houses, 1630 – 1730 Some things to look for are - steeply pitched, side-gabled roof with little or no eave overhang - no cornice detailing - small windows with narrow surrounds - vertical board doors - originally one room deep - First Period houses have always either been updated with later detailing or restored to their earlier appearance 4 First Period Houses, 1630 – 1730 Abraham Browne House, Watertown, ca. John Mason House, 1303 Massachusetts Avenue, 1698, restored, 1924 ca. 1715, altered ca. 1800 5 Georgian Style, 1720 - 1780 Some things to look for are - classical trim framing the front door – pediment, entablature and grooved (fluted) pilasters - house sits close to the ground - wide side walls - narrow, almost flat trim along the side edges of the roof (flush eaves) - windows with many small panes (12/12) - windows that fit tightly under front roof eaves - windows with small hip roofs over projecting window frames - large central chimney - row of glass panes (transom) set directly over the door 6 Georgian Style, 1720 - 1780 1377 Massachusetts Avenue, 1795 Buckman Tavern, 1 Bedford Street, 1710 7 Federal Style, 1780 - 1830 Some things to look for are - symmetrical appearance with flat, horizontal lines - two or four chimneys in gable end walls or set in from gable ends - windows usually spaced evenly, with shutters - occasional Palladian windows - delicate classical trim on windows and cornices - elaborate fan doorways, with side lights - occasional hip roofs - frequent brick construction 8 Federal Style, 1780 - 1830 517 Massachusetts Avenue, ca. 1830 782 Massachusetts Avenue, ca. 1833 177 Concord Avenue, ca. 1802 9 Greek Revival, 1830 - 1860 Some things to look for are Some things to look for are - pilasters at corners - pediment - a large porch across the entire front, with a pediment and entablature - entablature at front and side roof eaves - tall fluted columns with no moldings at the bottom - pilasters at corners - entrance with a row of glass panes (transom) at the top and long - entrance with a row of glass panes (transom ) at the top and long sidelights sidelights - small window panes (6/6) - long first floor windows in the front - entablature and pilasters that frame the doorway - pilasters at the corners with long panels inside 10 Greek Revival, 1830 - 1860 26 Hancock Street, c. 1840 14 Glen Road South, 1835, moved 1913 11 Greek Revival, 1830 - 1860 113 Concord Avenue, between 1830-1852; condo’d ca. 2001 12 Italianate, 1840 - 1880 Some things to look for are Some things to look for are - brackets at the roof edge, windows and porch - brackets at the roof edge, windows, tower and porch - round-arched windows - round or segmental- arched windows, some in pairs - windows with shelves at the top and tiny brackets at the bottom - windows with drip moldings - square posts on a long porch - deeply overhanging roof eaves - pilasters at corners with long panels inside - other classical features such as cornerblocks, railings (balustrades), pediments - one-story bay window and keystones in the arches - round arches in the door 13 Italianate, 1840 – 1880 89-91Bedford Street, 1851 Chandler House, 8 Goodwin Road, 1846 14 Gothic Revival, 1840 - 1880 Some things to look for are - steeply pitched roof with steep cross gables and dormers - decorated “vergeboards” or bargeboards - windows with pointed arches - one-story porch 15 Gothic Revival, 1840 - 1880 16 Hancock Street, probably 1840 186 Bedford Street, 1874 16 Mansard/Second Empire, 1855 - 1885 Some things to look for are - Mansard roof which can curve in, curve out or be straight-sided - windows with drip moldings - windows with shelves at the top and tiny brackets at the bottom - towers and bay windows - patterned slate on the roof - roof dormers that are almost flat and have rounded tops - a low, metal railing (cresting) along the top of the roof - Italianate trim: - brackets at the roof edge, windows and porch - round or segmental arched windows, sometimes in pairs 17 Mansard/Second Empire, 1855 - 1885 87 Waltham Street, 1870-75 5 Hancock Avenue, c. 1873 18 Stick Style, 1870 - 1890 Some things to look for are - diagonal, vertical and horizontal stickwork in trim, balconies and porches - high, steep roof - projecting eaves supported by exposed framing in gable end - many spindly chimneys - extensive porches with roofs supported by columns with diagonal braces 19 Stick Style, 1870 - 1890 36 Forest Street, c. 1886 39 Highland Avenue, 1887 20 Shingle Style, 1880 - 1910 Some things to look for are - walls covered completely with wooden shingles - roofs sweeping down over cave-like porch areas - broad gambrel or gable roofs - simple, narrow trim at the roof edges (flush eaves) - stonework with rough surfaces in the first story - rounded forms: towers, tower roofs, curved window tops (and sometimes sides) - thick porch posts – shingled or of stone 21 Shingle Style, 1880 - 1910 25 Oakland Street, 1887 7 Bennington Road, 1896 22 Queen Anne, 1875 - 1910 Some things to look for are - tower with a pointed roof - bay window with slanted sides underneath a rectangular projection - fancy wooden shingles in different patterns - vergeboards (hanging from the porch roof) that are made of solid pieces of wood - porch posts with rounded shapes - brackets with holes in them - doors with glass in the upper part 23 Queen Anne, 1875 - 1910 2016 Massachusetts Avenue, 60 Bloomfield Street, 1893 16 Oakland Street, 1888 between 1890-1903 24 Romanesque Revival, 1840 -1900 Some things to look for are - round topped arches over windows, porch support, entrance - masonry walls with rough-faced, squared stonework - round towers with conical roofs - asymmetrical facade 25 Romanesque Revival, 1840 -1900 Oakmount, Hayes Estate, Meriam Hill, 1884-1941 Hancock School, 33 Forest Street, 1891 26 Colonial Revival, 1885 - 1910 Some things to look for are - oversized features – huge dormers, large porches, wide entrances with large fanlight and decorated sidelights - two-story rounded bay windows on either side of the front door - extensive use of classical details: - windows with single panes in the bottom and small panes in the top - railings (balustrades) over porches and along decks - pediments with many shapes, especially in dormers - many columns - Palladian arched windows and oval windows - entablature and decoration at cornice - smooth columns in the porch - corner pilasters 27 Colonial Revival, 1885 - 1910 25 Adams Street, 1905 46 Hancock Street, 1897 28 Colonial Revival, 1885 - 1910 27 Meriam Street, 1889 29 Tudor Revival, 1900 - 1940 Some things to look for are - steeply pitched roof, usually side-gabled - prominent cross-gable on facade - half-timbering on facade - tall, narrow windows with multiple panes - massive chimneys 30 Tudor Revival, 1900 - 1940 11 Taft Avenue, 1933-1937 39 Meriam Street, 1939 31 Arts & Crafts/Craftsman/Bungalow ,1905 - 1930 Some things to look for are - low pitched, gable roofs with wide eave overhang - exposed roof rafters - decorative beams or braces under gables - porches with tapered square columns 32 Arts & Crafts/Craftsman/Bungalow, 1905 - 1930 44 Fletcher Avenue, 1928 67 Lowell Street, 1921 33 Dutch Colonial Revival, 1900 - 1940 Some things to look for are - one to one and one half stories - side-gabled or side- gambreled roof with little or no eaves - entrance doors with separately opening upper and lower halves 34 Dutch Colonial Revival, 1900 - 1940 42 Bertwell Road, c. 1924 35 Spanish Colonial Revival/20th Century Eclectic, 1915 - 1940 Some things to look for are - low pitched roof, with little or no eave overhang - red tile roof covering - one or more prominent arches placed above door or principal window, or beneath porch roof - wall surface usually stucco - façade usually asymmetrical 36 Spanish Colonial Revival/20th Century Eclectic, 1915 - 1940 Journey’s End, 110 Shade Street, 1937 39 Locust Avenue, 1919 37 “Cape Cod,” 1930 - 1960 Some things to look for are - side-gabled roofs - two-room widths - one to one and a half stories - central or paired end chimneys - symmetrical facades with shuttered
Recommended publications
  • RACE, SPACE, and PLACE: the RELATION BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL MODERNISM, POST-MODERNISM, URBAN PLANNING, and GENTRIFICATION Keith A

    RACE, SPACE, and PLACE: the RELATION BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL MODERNISM, POST-MODERNISM, URBAN PLANNING, and GENTRIFICATION Keith A

    RACE, SPACE, AND PLACE: THE RELATION BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL MODERNISM, POST-MODERNISM, URBAN PLANNING, AND GENTRIFICATION Keith Aoki * [Cite as: 20 Fordham Urb. L.J. 699 (1993)] Introduction Gentrification in United States urban housing markets of the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s continues to be a controversial and complex phenomenon. [FN1] During the past twenty years, gentrification's effects on the core cities of the U.S. have been analyzed and evaluated many times over. [FN2] Descriptions of gentrification have spanned the ideological *700 spectrum, from laudatory embraces of gentrification as the solution to urban decline to denunciatory critiques of gentrification as another symptom of the widening gulf between the haves and the have- nots in America. [FN3] This Article critiques gentrification, adding an additional explanatory element to the ongoing account of the dynamics of American cities in the 1990s. The additional element is the relevance of a major aesthetic realignment in architecture and urban planning from a modernist to a post-modernist ideology in the 1970s and 1980s. This shift involved an aesthetic and economic revaluation of historical elements in older central city buildings, which accelerated the rate of gentrification, displacement, and abandonment. This Article describes how certain shifts in the aesthetic ideology [FN4] of urban planners and architects affected suburban and urban spatial distribution in the United States during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. These ideological shifts arose from deeply embedded American attitudes toward city and rural life that had emerged in American town planning and architectural theory and practice by the mid-nineteenth century. Part I of this Article examines the emergence of an anti-urban Arcadian strand in nineteenth century American town planning rhetoric.
  • Architectural Styles/Types

    Architectural Styles/Types

    Architectural Findings Summary of Architectural Trends 1940‐70 National architectural trends are evident within the survey area. The breakdown of mid‐20th‐ century styles and building types in the Architectural Findings section gives more detail about the Dayton metropolitan area’s built environment and its place within national architectural developments. In American Architecture: An Illustrated Encyclopedia, Cyril Harris defines Modern architecture as “A loosely applied term, used since the late 19th century, for buildings, in any of number of styles, in which emphasis in design is placed on functionalism, rationalism, and up‐to‐date methods of construction; in contrast with architectural styles based on historical precedents and traditional ways of building. Often includes Art Deco, Art Moderne, Bauhaus, Contemporary style, International Style, Organic architecture, and Streamline Moderne.” (Harris 217) The debate over traditional styles versus those without historic precedent had been occurring within the architectural community since the late 19th century when Louis Sullivan declared that form should follow function and Frank Lloyd Wright argued for a purely American expression of design that eschewed European influence. In 1940, as America was about to enter the middle decades of the 20th century, architects battled over the merits of traditional versus modern design. Both the traditional Period Revival, or conservative styles, and the early 20th‐century Modern styles lingered into the 1940s. Period revival styles, popular for decades, could still be found on commercial, governmental, institutional, and residential buildings. Among these styles were the Colonial Revival and its multiple variations, the Tudor Revival, and the Neo‐Classical Revival. As the century progressed, the Colonial Revival in particular would remain popular, used as ornament for Cape Cod and Ranch houses, apartment buildings, and commercial buildings.
  • Suburbanization Historic Context and Survey Methodology

    Suburbanization Historic Context and Survey Methodology

    INTRODUCTION The geographical area for this project is Maryland’s 42-mile section of the I-95/I- 495 Capital Beltway. The historic context was developed for applicability in the broad area encompassed within the Beltway. The survey of historic resources was applied to a more limited corridor along I-495, where resources abutting the Beltway ranged from neighborhoods of simple Cape Cods to large-scale Colonial Revival neighborhoods. The process of preparing this Suburbanization Context consisted of: • conducting an initial reconnaissance survey to establish the extant resources in the project area; • developing a history of suburbanization, including a study of community design in the suburbs and building patterns within them; • defining and delineating anticipated suburban property types; • developing a framework for evaluating their significance; • proposing a survey methodology tailored to these property types; • and conducting a survey and National Register evaluation of resources within the limited corridor along I-495. The historic context was planned and executed according to the following goals: • to briefly cover the trends which influenced suburbanization throughout the United States and to illustrate examples which highlight the trends; • to present more detail in statewide trends, which focused on Baltimore as the primary area of earliest and typical suburban growth within the state; • and, to focus at a more detailed level on the local suburbanization development trends in the Washington, D.C. suburbs, particularly the Maryland counties of Montgomery and Prince George’s. Although related to transportation routes such as railroad lines, trolley lines, and highways and freeways, the location and layout of Washington’s suburbs were influenced by the special nature of the Capital city and its dependence on a growing bureaucracy and not the typical urban industrial base.
  • Architectural Resourcesresources

    Architectural Resourcesresources

    CHAPTER2 ARCHITECTURALARCHITECTURAL RESOURCESRESOURCES Key features of historic resources should be preserved. This chapter presents a historic overview and identifies the key features of architectural styles found in San Jose: • Vernacular or National p. 17 • Italianate and Italianate Cottage p. 18 • Greek Revival p. 19 • Carpenter Gothic or Folk Victorian p. 19 • Queen Anne p. 20 • Stick p. 21 • Shingle p. 22 • Neoclassical p. 23 • Colonial Revival p. 24 • Dutch Colonial Revival p. 24 • Craftsman p. 25 • Bungalow p. 26 • Prairie p. 27 • Tudor Revival p. 28 • Mission Revival p. 28 • Spanish Eclectic or Spanish Colonial Revival or Mediterranean Revival p. 29 • Italian Renaissance p. 30 • Art Deco p. 30 • Art Moderne p. 31 • International p. 31 • Mid-Century Modern p. 32 Guide for Preserving San Jose Homes Chapter 2: Architectural Resources CHAPTER 2 ARCHITECTURALARCHITECTURAL RESOURCESRESOURCES Individual building features are important to the character of San Jose. The mass and scale, form, materials and architectural details of the buildings are the elements that distinguish one architectural style from another, or even older neighborhoods from newer developments. This chapter presents an overview of those important elements of the built environment which make up San Jose. This includes a brief history of development, as well as a summary of the different types and styles of architecture found in its neighborhoods. Brief History Vendome neighborhood, just to the northwest of the The settlement of the Santa Clara Valley by Euro- present-day Hensley Historic District. This original site Americans began in 1769 with an initial exploration was subjected to severe winter flooding during the first of the valley by Spanish explorers.
  • The Evolution of Architecture Faculty Organizational Culture at the University of Michigan Linda Mills

    The Evolution of Architecture Faculty Organizational Culture at the University of Michigan Linda Mills

    Eastern Michigan University DigitalCommons@EMU Master's Theses, and Doctoral Dissertations, and Master's Theses and Doctoral Dissertations Graduate Capstone Projects 2018 The evolution of architecture faculty organizational culture at the University of Michigan Linda Mills Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.emich.edu/theses Part of the Educational Leadership Commons, and the Higher Education Administration Commons Recommended Citation Mills, Linda, "The ve olution of architecture faculty organizational culture at the University of Michigan" (2018). Master's Theses and Doctoral Dissertations. 933. https://commons.emich.edu/theses/933 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Master's Theses, and Doctoral Dissertations, and Graduate Capstone Projects at DigitalCommons@EMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses and Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@EMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Running head: ARCHITECTURE FACULTY ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE The Evolution of Architecture Faculty Organizational Culture at the University of Michigan by Linda Mills Dissertation Eastern Michigan University Submitted to the Department of Leadership and Counseling Eastern Michigan University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Educational Leadership Dissertation Committee: Ronald Flowers, Ed.D. Chair Jaclynn Tracy, Ph.D. Raul Leon, Ph.D. Russell Olwell, Ph.D. September 27, 2018 Ypsilanti, Michigan ARCHITECTURE FACULTY ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE ii Dedication This research is dedicated to all of the non-academic staff at the University of Michigan, at-will employees, who are working to support the work of faculty who operate with different norms, values and operating paradigms, protected by tenure, and unaware of the cognitive dissonance that exists between their operating worlds and ours.
  • Architecture Overview and Activities

    Architecture Overview and Activities

    Educational Material Architecture Overview and Activities What is architecture? As defined by Merriam-Webster architecture is: 1. the art or science of building, specifically: the art or practice of designing and building structures and especially habitable ones. 2. a: formation or construction resulting from or as if from a conscious act (the architecture of the garden) b: a unifying or coherent form or structure (the novel lacks architecture) 3. architectural product or work. 4. a method or style of building. 5. the manner in which the components of a computer or computer system are organized and integrated Architectural style refers to the visual appearance of a building and not its function. Style is often influenced by values and aspirations held by a society or a community. Certain designs may serve as metaphors or symbols of what a particular group of people value, of what they consider important. For example, when the Pilgrims first settled in Massachusetts in 1620 they built structures that served their immediate needs: shelter and places of worship. Creating these particular buildings reflected their collective desire for a new home (building a house creates a feeling of permanence and stability) and freedom to worship as they liked. As more people settled in America they brought their own cultural styles and ideas which have continued to influence architectural design. Who Builds Great Buildings? Most of the world’s great buildings have been designed by architects. But there are many other buildings, including many homes, which were built by builders with no architectural training. These builders have sometimes used published plans created by architects or have created their own.
  • Frank Lloyd Wright's

    Frank Lloyd Wright's

    Usonia, N E W Y O R K PROOF 1 Usonia, N E W Y O R K Building a Community with Frank Lloyd Wright ROLAND REISLEY with John Timpane Foreword by MARTIN FILLER PRINCETON ARCHITECTURAL PRESS, NEW YORK PROOF 2 PUBLISHED BY This publication was supported in part with PRINCETON ARCHITECTURAL PRESS funds from the New York State Council on the 37 EAST SEVENTH STREET Arts, a state agency. NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10003 Special thanks to: Nettie Aljian, Ann Alter, Amanda For a free catalog of books, call 1.8... Atkins, Janet Behning, Jan Cigliano, Jane Garvie, Judith Visit our web site at www.papress.com. Koppenberg, Mark Lamster, Nancy Eklund Later, Brian McDonald, Anne Nitschke, Evan Schoninger, © Princeton Architectural Press Lottchen Shivers, and Jennifer Thompson of Princeton All rights reserved Architectural Press—Kevin C. Lippert, publisher Printed in China First edition Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Reisley, Roland, – No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any Usonia, New York : building a community with manner without written permission from the publisher Frank Lloyd Wright / Roland Reisley with John except in the context of reviews. Timpane ; foreword by Martin Filler. p. cm. Every reasonable attempt has been made to identify isbn --- owners of copyright. Errors or omissions will be corrected . Usonian houses—New York (State)—Pleasant- in subsequent editions. ville. Utopias—New York (State)—Pleasantville— History. Architecture, Domestic—New York All photographs © Roland Reisley unless otherwise (State)—Pleasantville. Wright, Frank Lloyd, indicated. –—Criticism and interpretation. i. Title: Usonia. ii. Timpane, John Philip. iii.
  • Historic Context and Survey of Post-World War II Residential Architecture Boulder, Colorado FINAL

    Historic Context and Survey of Post-World War II Residential Architecture Boulder, Colorado FINAL

    Historic Context and Survey of Post-World War II Residential Architecture Boulder, Colorado FINAL Prepared for the City of Boulder, Colorado In association with the State Historical Fund Colorado Historical Society By Jennifer Bryant and Carrie Schomig TEC Inc. April 2010 Historic Context and Survey of Post-World War II Residential Architecture, Boulder, Colorado FUNDING AND PARTICIPANTS Prepared for the Funded by State Historic Fund Grant City of Boulder Project #08-01-007 Community Planning and Sustainability Department Historic Preservation Program The Colorado Historical Society’s State Boulder, CO 80306 Historical Fund (SHF) was created by the 1990 James Hewat, Historic Preservation Planner Colorado constitutional amendment allowing 303-441-3207 limited gaming in the towns of Cripple Creek, Central City, and Black Hawk. The amendment Prepared by directs that a portion of the gaming tax Jennifer Bryant, M.A., Historian revenues be used to promote historic Carrie Schomig, M.Arh., Architectural Historian preservation throughout the state. Funds are TEC Inc. distributed through a competitive grant 1658 Cole Boulevard, Suite 190 process, and all projects must demonstrate Golden, Colorado 80401 strong public benefit and community support. The City of Boulder, Historic Preservation State Historical Fund Coordinator Program has been awarded a SHF grant to Elizabeth Blackwell develop a historic context related to the theme Historic Preservation Specialist of post-World War II residential architecture in State Historical Fund the City of Boulder. Colorado Historical Society State Survey Project Coordinator Mary Therese Anstey Historical and Architectural Survey Coordinator Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Colorado Historical Society 225 East 16th Avenue, Suite 950 Denver, CO 80203 Cover: This circa (ca.) 1953-1956 photograph shows the Edgewood subdivision in north-central Boulder, looking northwest.
  • Architectural Findings

    Architectural Findings

    Architectural Findings Summary of Architectural Trends 1940‐70 National architectural trends are evident within the survey area. The breakdown of mid‐20th‐ century styles and building types in the Architectural Findings section gives more detail about the Dayton metropolitan area’s built environment and its place within national architectural developments. In American Architecture: An Illustrated Encyclopedia, Cyril Harris defines Modern architecture as “A loosely applied term, used since the late 19th century, for buildings, in any of number of styles, in which emphasis in design is placed on functionalism, rationalism, and up‐to‐date methods of construction; in contrast with architectural styles based on historical precedents and traditional ways of building. Often includes Art Deco, Art Moderne, Bauhaus, Contemporary style, International Style, Organic architecture, and Streamline Moderne.” (Harris 217) The debate over traditional styles versus those without historic precedent had been occurring within the architectural community since the late 19th century when Louis Sullivan declared that form should follow function and Frank Lloyd Wright argued for a purely American expression of design that eschewed European influence. In 1940, as America was about to enter the middle decades of the 20th century, architects battled over the merits of traditional versus modern design. Both the traditional Period Revival, or conservative styles, and the early 20th‐century Modern styles lingered into the 1940s. Period revival styles, popular for decades, could still be found on commercial, governmental, institutional, and residential buildings. Among these styles were the Colonial Revival and its multiple variations, the Tudor Revival, and the Neo‐Classical Revival. As the century progressed, the Colonial Revival in particular would remain popular, used as ornament for Cape Cod and Ranch houses, apartment buildings, and commercial buildings.
  • National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Submissions

    National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Submissions

    CULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Information for Parks, Federal Agencies, Indian Tribes, States, Local Governments, and the Private Sector VOLUME 19 NO. 9 1996 CRM SUPPLEMENT National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Submissions he National Register of Historic California, or Usonian Houses by Frank Lloyd Places has been accepting multiple Wright, 1945-1960, in Iowa, contain valuable infor­ property nominations since 1977. mation that can be used in other states. To date, over one third of the Many cover documents are worthy of publica­ 66,300 National Register listings tion. The National Park Service encourages nominat­ are parTt of multiple property submissions. The ing authorities and others to seek ways to have them National Register multiple property nomination is published for scholars and the public to use. The designed to be a flexible tool for recording written information contained in them can also be used in statements of historic context and associated prop­ developing travel itineraries, World Wide Web sites, erty types and to provide a framework for evaluating for walking tours, interpretative projects, and other the significance of a related group of historic proper­ public education initiatives. ties. The statement of historic context is a written National Register Bulletin 16B: How to narrative that describes the unifying thematic frame­ Complete the National Register Multiple Property work; it must be developed in sufficient depth to Documentation Form (issued in 1991) explains in support the history, the relationships, and the detail how to nominate groups of related significant importance of the properties to be considered. A properties to the National Register. A video, The property type is a grouping of individual properties Multiple Property Approach, has been produced by characterized by common physical and/or associa­ the National Register.
  • Teori Arsitektur 03

    Teori Arsitektur 03

    •Victorian architecture 1837 and 1901 UK •Neolithic architecture 10,000 BC-3000 BC •Jacobethan 1838 •Sumerian architecture 5300 BC-2000 BC •Carpenter Gothic USA and Canada 1840s on •Soft Portuguese style 1940-1955 Portugal & colonies •Ancient Egyptian architecture 3000 BC-373 AD •Queenslander (architecture) 1840s–1960s •Ranch-style 1940s-1970s USA •Classical architecture 600 BC-323 AD Australian architectural styles •New towns 1946-1968 United Kingdom Ancient Greek architecture 776 BC-265 BC •Romanesque Revival architecture 1840–1900 USA •Mid-century modern 1950s California, etc. Roman architecture 753 BC–663 AD •Neo-Manueline 1840s-1910s Portugal & Brazil •Florida Modern 1950s or Tropical Modern •Architecture of Armenia (IVe s - XVIe s) •Neo-Grec 1848 and 1865 •Googie architecture 1950s USA •Merovingian architecture 400s-700s France and Germany •Adirondack Architecture 1850s New York, USA •Brutalist architecture 1950s–1970s •Anglo-Saxon architecture 450s-1066 England and Wales •Bristol Byzantine 1850-1880 •Structuralism 1950s-1970s •Byzantine architecture 527 (Sofia)-1520 •Second Empire 1865 and 1880 •Metabolist Movement 1959 Japan •Islamic Architecture 691-present •Queen Anne Style architecture 1870–1910s England & USA •Arcology 1970s-present •Carolingian architecture 780s-800s France and Germany Stick Style 1879-1905 New England •Repoblación architecture 880s-1000s Spain •Structural Expressionism 1980s-present Eastlake Style 1879-1905 New England •Ottonian architecture 950s-1050s Germany Shingle Style 1879-1905 New England •Postmodern architecture 1980s •Russian architecture 989-1700s •National Park Service Rustic 1872–present USA •Romanesque architecture 1050-1100 •Deconstructivism 1982–present •Chicago school (architecture) 1880s and 1890 USA •Norman architecture 1074-1250 •Memphis Group 1981-1988 •Neo-Byzantine architecture 1882–1920s American •Blobitecture 2003–present •Gothic architecture •Art Nouveau/Jugendstil c.
  • Ndcrs Site Form Training Manual: Architectural Sites

    Ndcrs Site Form Training Manual: Architectural Sites

    NDCRS SITE FORM TRAINING MANUAL: ARCHITECTURAL SITES By J. Signe Snortland, L. Martin Perry, Lauren McCroskey, Fern E. Swenson, Amy C. Bleier, Lorna B. Meidinger Division of Archeology & Historic Preservation State Historical Society of North Dakota North Dakota Heritage Center & State Museum Bismarck, North Dakota https://www.history.nd.gov/hp/index.html 2020 Entire contents copyrighted 2020 State Historical Society of North Dakota All rights reserved Produced by the Division of Archeology and Historic Preservation, State Historical Society of North Dakota Cover photo: Former Governor’s Mansion State Historic Site (32BL17), Burleigh County. Victorian Stick Style, constructed in 1884. Location: 320 E. Ave B, Bismarck, North Dakota. NDCRS Architectural Site Form Manual—2020 Page 2 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 6 NDCRS AND GIS ...................................................................................................................... 6 CULTURAL HERITAGE FORM .............................................................................................. 7 HOW TO COMPLETE A NDCRS SITE FORM....................................................................... 7 Defined Non-Sites and Property Types Requiring No Formal Documentation ..................... 8 General Rules for Completion of NDCRS Site Forms ........................................................... 9 PDF Site Forms ....................................................................................................................