Historic Architectural Treasures
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
RACE, SPACE, and PLACE: the RELATION BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL MODERNISM, POST-MODERNISM, URBAN PLANNING, and GENTRIFICATION Keith A
RACE, SPACE, AND PLACE: THE RELATION BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL MODERNISM, POST-MODERNISM, URBAN PLANNING, AND GENTRIFICATION Keith Aoki * [Cite as: 20 Fordham Urb. L.J. 699 (1993)] Introduction Gentrification in United States urban housing markets of the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s continues to be a controversial and complex phenomenon. [FN1] During the past twenty years, gentrification's effects on the core cities of the U.S. have been analyzed and evaluated many times over. [FN2] Descriptions of gentrification have spanned the ideological *700 spectrum, from laudatory embraces of gentrification as the solution to urban decline to denunciatory critiques of gentrification as another symptom of the widening gulf between the haves and the have- nots in America. [FN3] This Article critiques gentrification, adding an additional explanatory element to the ongoing account of the dynamics of American cities in the 1990s. The additional element is the relevance of a major aesthetic realignment in architecture and urban planning from a modernist to a post-modernist ideology in the 1970s and 1980s. This shift involved an aesthetic and economic revaluation of historical elements in older central city buildings, which accelerated the rate of gentrification, displacement, and abandonment. This Article describes how certain shifts in the aesthetic ideology [FN4] of urban planners and architects affected suburban and urban spatial distribution in the United States during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. These ideological shifts arose from deeply embedded American attitudes toward city and rural life that had emerged in American town planning and architectural theory and practice by the mid-nineteenth century. Part I of this Article examines the emergence of an anti-urban Arcadian strand in nineteenth century American town planning rhetoric. -
DATE ISSUED: August 10, 2017 REPORT NO
The City of San Diego Report to the Historical Resources Board DATE ISSUED: August 10, 2017 REPORT NO. HRB-17-047 HEARING DATE: August 24, 2017 SUBJECT: ITEM #5 – William and Carrie Old Bungalow Court RESOURCE INFO: California Historical Resources Inventory Database (CHRID) link APPLICANT: Atlas at 30th Street LLC represented by Scott A. Moomjian LOCATION: 2002-2010 30th Street, Golden Hill Community, Council District 3 APN 539-155-13-00 DESCRIPTION: Consider the designation of the William and Carrie Old Bungalow Court located at 2002-2010 30th Street as a historical resource. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Designate the William and Carrie Old Bungalow Court located at 2002-2010 30th Street as a historical resource with a period of significance of 1948 under HRB Criteria A and C. This recommendation is based on the following findings: 1. The resource is a special element of Golden Hill and San Diego’s historical and architectural development and retains integrity to its 1948 date of construction and period of significance. Specifically, the resource embodies the character defining features of a recognized variety of bungalow court, is one of a finite and limited number of bungalow courts remaining which reflect the early- to mid-20th century development of multi-family housing in Golden Hill and San Diego, and retains integrity for that association. 2. The resource embodies the distinctive characteristics through the retention of character defining features of a Minimal Traditional style bungalow court and retains a good level of architectural integrity from its 1948 date of construction and period of significance. Specifically, the resource retains an original attached full court layout; gabled roof forms with boxed eave and minimal overhang; wood shingle cladding accented with brick; multi- light wood double hung and fixed windows; and modest, compact size with simple plan forms. -
The Houses of Grant Neighborhood Salem, Oregon
The Houses of Grant Neighborhood Salem, Oregon The Houses of Grant Neighborhood By Kirsten Straus and Sean Edging City of Salem Historic Planning Division and Grant Neighborhood Association 2015 Welcome to The Grant Neighborhood! This guide was created as a way for you and your family to learn more about the historic city of Salem and within that, the historic neighborhood of Grant! This neighborhood boasts a diverse collection of beautiful and historic homes. Please use this guide to deci- pher the architectural style of your own home and learn more about why the Grant neighborhood is worth preserving. This project has been completed through a combined effort of the City of Salem Historic Planning Division, The Grant Neighborhood Association and Portland State University Professor Thomas Hubka. For more information, contact either the City of Salem Historic Plan- ning Division or The Grant Neighbor- hood Association. City of Salem Historic Planning Division Kimberli Fitzgerald: [email protected] 503-540-2397 Sally Studnar: [email protected] 503-540-2311 The Grant Neighborhood Association www.grantneighborhood.org GNA meetings are held the first Thursday of each month at the Grant Community School starting at 6:15 pm. All are welcome to at- tend! The Grant Neighborhood Contents The History of Salem and Grant Neighborhood 6 Map of The Grant Neighborhood 10 Housing Styles 12 Feature Guide 12-13 Early Settlement 14 Bungalow 18 Period Revival 24 Post WWII 28 Unique Styles and Combinations 31 Multi-Family 32 Historic Grant Buildings 34 Neighborhood Narrative 38 Designated Homes 40 Further Reading and Works Cited 42 5 The Grant Neighborhood The History of Salem and Grant According to historic records dating back to 1850, North Salem began developing in the area north of D Street. -
Mid-Twentieth Century Architecture in Alaska Historic Context (1945-1968)
Mid-Twentieth Century Architecture in Alaska Historic Context (1945-1968) Prepared by Amy Ramirez . Jeanne Lambin . Robert L. Meinhardt . and Casey Woster 2016 The Cultural Resource Programs of the National Park Service have responsibilities that include stewardship of historic buildings, museum collections, archeological sites, cultural landscapes, oral and written histories, and ethnographic resources. The material is based upon work assisted by funding from the National Park Service. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of the Interior. Printed 2018 Cover: Atwood Center, Alaska Pacific University, Anchorage, 2017, NPS photograph MID-TWENTIETH CENTURY ARCHITECTURE IN ALASKA HISTORIC CONTEXT (1945 – 1968) Prepared for National Park Service, Alaska Regional Office Prepared by Amy Ramirez, B.A. Jeanne Lambin, M.S. Robert L. Meinhardt, M.A. and Casey Woster, M.A. July 2016 Table of Contents LIST OF ACRONYMS/ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................... 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 8 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Historic Context as a Planning & Evaluation Tool ............................................................................ -
Architectural Styles/Types
Architectural Findings Summary of Architectural Trends 1940‐70 National architectural trends are evident within the survey area. The breakdown of mid‐20th‐ century styles and building types in the Architectural Findings section gives more detail about the Dayton metropolitan area’s built environment and its place within national architectural developments. In American Architecture: An Illustrated Encyclopedia, Cyril Harris defines Modern architecture as “A loosely applied term, used since the late 19th century, for buildings, in any of number of styles, in which emphasis in design is placed on functionalism, rationalism, and up‐to‐date methods of construction; in contrast with architectural styles based on historical precedents and traditional ways of building. Often includes Art Deco, Art Moderne, Bauhaus, Contemporary style, International Style, Organic architecture, and Streamline Moderne.” (Harris 217) The debate over traditional styles versus those without historic precedent had been occurring within the architectural community since the late 19th century when Louis Sullivan declared that form should follow function and Frank Lloyd Wright argued for a purely American expression of design that eschewed European influence. In 1940, as America was about to enter the middle decades of the 20th century, architects battled over the merits of traditional versus modern design. Both the traditional Period Revival, or conservative styles, and the early 20th‐century Modern styles lingered into the 1940s. Period revival styles, popular for decades, could still be found on commercial, governmental, institutional, and residential buildings. Among these styles were the Colonial Revival and its multiple variations, the Tudor Revival, and the Neo‐Classical Revival. As the century progressed, the Colonial Revival in particular would remain popular, used as ornament for Cape Cod and Ranch houses, apartment buildings, and commercial buildings. -
Architectural Resourcesresources
CHAPTER2 ARCHITECTURALARCHITECTURAL RESOURCESRESOURCES Key features of historic resources should be preserved. This chapter presents a historic overview and identifies the key features of architectural styles found in San Jose: • Vernacular or National p. 17 • Italianate and Italianate Cottage p. 18 • Greek Revival p. 19 • Carpenter Gothic or Folk Victorian p. 19 • Queen Anne p. 20 • Stick p. 21 • Shingle p. 22 • Neoclassical p. 23 • Colonial Revival p. 24 • Dutch Colonial Revival p. 24 • Craftsman p. 25 • Bungalow p. 26 • Prairie p. 27 • Tudor Revival p. 28 • Mission Revival p. 28 • Spanish Eclectic or Spanish Colonial Revival or Mediterranean Revival p. 29 • Italian Renaissance p. 30 • Art Deco p. 30 • Art Moderne p. 31 • International p. 31 • Mid-Century Modern p. 32 Guide for Preserving San Jose Homes Chapter 2: Architectural Resources CHAPTER 2 ARCHITECTURALARCHITECTURAL RESOURCESRESOURCES Individual building features are important to the character of San Jose. The mass and scale, form, materials and architectural details of the buildings are the elements that distinguish one architectural style from another, or even older neighborhoods from newer developments. This chapter presents an overview of those important elements of the built environment which make up San Jose. This includes a brief history of development, as well as a summary of the different types and styles of architecture found in its neighborhoods. Brief History Vendome neighborhood, just to the northwest of the The settlement of the Santa Clara Valley by Euro- present-day Hensley Historic District. This original site Americans began in 1769 with an initial exploration was subjected to severe winter flooding during the first of the valley by Spanish explorers. -
1962-05-10, [P ]
REALTORS REALTORS REALTORS REALTORS REALTORS REALTORS REALTORS REALTORS OPEN SAT. - SUN., 1 - 8 A HAS A HOME Rambling Websters Guaranteed Sales Plan EAST CLEVELAND - EUCLID - WICKLIFFE - WILLOUGHBY - Thunderbird This plan is designed to help you purchase your next home without the uncertainties of disposing of WILLOWICK-EASTLAKE-HIGHLAND HTS.- RICHMOND HTS. Ranchers your present homo in the usual manner. Expensive double moving interim apartment or in-low For Everyone! living; furniture storing; blanket mortgages, and various other costs or problems are eliminated. This, Office Open Daily S A.M. to 9 P.M—Closed Sundays 25 new ranch homes on Bramble briefly, is how the plan works: wood Dr., north of Blvd., 5 1. You select the Webster home of your choice, now or used, streets east of Rt. 306. Look for sign an offer te purchase eon tin- gent upon the sale or trade of your present home, and if If YOU don't see YOUR home listed below our Thunderbird sign on Blvd. you ore purchasing a new hemo Veterans nothing down, all place a temporary $100 deposit, which will hold the new home until step number 2 and 3 call NOWI We have many more. others $495. Finest buy today. are completed. 3 spacious bedrooms, IV2 baths, Upon acceptance of the offer to purchase an appointment will b* scheduled for you a* the MORE PEOPLE SIGN WITH PENAf custom built kitchen plus dining office of Webster Realty, Inc. for the purpose of applying for an FHA Conditional Commit* room; aluminum siding. East iment on your present home, which, as required, will be processed thru an accredited lending Ohio gas, city water, storm and institution. -
Bondi Junction Heritage Assessment 2010
BONDI JUNCTION HERITAGE ASSESSMENT 2010 Bondi Junction (Source: Local Studies Collection, Waverley Library). Table of Contents Heritage Assessment of Bondi Junction - 2010 PAGE 2 Bondi Junction Heritage Assessment Item identification Sheet Name: Item No.: Talbot Flats i1 Other Names: Type of Item: Precinct Address: Group of Buildings X 16 Allens Parade Single Building Land Title Information: Engineering Work Pt Lot 3, DP 11196, SP 11481 Historic Site Monument Garden/Park Other Description and Historic Background: Period: A typical two storey 1920's style flat building. Symmetrical with two 1800-1858 1859-1880 gables. Dark brick with white painted render for decoration. Projecting 1881-1918 front with its own large gable. Second gable behind. Decorated with 1919-1968 X shingling and battening. Two bays to first floor. No major alterations. 1969-1989 1990-2003 Significance: Believed to be one of the first flat buildings built at Bondi Junction. Special interest as one of the first in the area. Survives relatively intact. References: Settlement Heritage NSW Patterns: Land Grants Private Subdivisions Suburban development Other Significance : Historic X Scientific Cultural X Social Archaeological Architectural X Natural Aesthetic X Heritage Assessment of Bondi Junction - 2010 PAGE 3 Bondi Junction Heritage Assessment Item identification Sheet Name: Item No.: The Grove i2 Other Names: Type of Item: Precinct Address: Group of Buildings 27 Allens Parade Single Building X Land Title Information: Engineering Work Pt Lot 17b, DP 11197, SP 19633 Historic Site Monument Garden/Park Other Description and Historic Background: Period: Excellent two storey flat building, c. 1940. Outstanding feature is 1800-1858 1859-1880 large Tudor style gable, with apex in terra cottage shingling. -
Inventory—Nomination Form
FHR-8-300 (11-78) United States Department of the Interior Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries complete applicable sections_______________ 1. Name historic East Side School and/or common Old Junior High 2. Location street & number All of Block 212, Original Town of Laramie not for publication city, town Laramie vicinity of congressional district First state Wyoming code county Albany code 001 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district ^ publicr occupied agriculture museum X building(s) private X unoccupied commercial park structure both work in progress X educational private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object in process yes: restricted government scientific being considered _X_ yes: unrestricted industrial transportation no military other: 4. Owner of Property name Albany County School District #1 street & number 1948 Grand Avenue city, town Laramie vicinity of state Wyoming 82070 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Albany County Courthouse street & number 6th Street and Grand Avenue city, town Laramie state Wyoming 82070 6. Representation in Existing Surveys title Wyoming Recreation Commission has this property been determined elegible? yes no date 1967 (revised 1973) federal X state county local depository for survey records 604 East 25th Street city, town Cheyenne state Wyoming 82002 7. Description Condition Check one Check one __ excellent deteriorated X unaltered X original** site X good ._.._ X altered moved date fair unexposed 1878 portion is altered 1928 portion is unaltered Describe the present and original (if known) physical appearance East Side School was built in the exact center of Block 212 in the original town of Laramie. -
Architecture Overview and Activities
Educational Material Architecture Overview and Activities What is architecture? As defined by Merriam-Webster architecture is: 1. the art or science of building, specifically: the art or practice of designing and building structures and especially habitable ones. 2. a: formation or construction resulting from or as if from a conscious act (the architecture of the garden) b: a unifying or coherent form or structure (the novel lacks architecture) 3. architectural product or work. 4. a method or style of building. 5. the manner in which the components of a computer or computer system are organized and integrated Architectural style refers to the visual appearance of a building and not its function. Style is often influenced by values and aspirations held by a society or a community. Certain designs may serve as metaphors or symbols of what a particular group of people value, of what they consider important. For example, when the Pilgrims first settled in Massachusetts in 1620 they built structures that served their immediate needs: shelter and places of worship. Creating these particular buildings reflected their collective desire for a new home (building a house creates a feeling of permanence and stability) and freedom to worship as they liked. As more people settled in America they brought their own cultural styles and ideas which have continued to influence architectural design. Who Builds Great Buildings? Most of the world’s great buildings have been designed by architects. But there are many other buildings, including many homes, which were built by builders with no architectural training. These builders have sometimes used published plans created by architects or have created their own. -
Frank Lloyd Wright's
Usonia, N E W Y O R K PROOF 1 Usonia, N E W Y O R K Building a Community with Frank Lloyd Wright ROLAND REISLEY with John Timpane Foreword by MARTIN FILLER PRINCETON ARCHITECTURAL PRESS, NEW YORK PROOF 2 PUBLISHED BY This publication was supported in part with PRINCETON ARCHITECTURAL PRESS funds from the New York State Council on the 37 EAST SEVENTH STREET Arts, a state agency. NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10003 Special thanks to: Nettie Aljian, Ann Alter, Amanda For a free catalog of books, call 1.8... Atkins, Janet Behning, Jan Cigliano, Jane Garvie, Judith Visit our web site at www.papress.com. Koppenberg, Mark Lamster, Nancy Eklund Later, Brian McDonald, Anne Nitschke, Evan Schoninger, © Princeton Architectural Press Lottchen Shivers, and Jennifer Thompson of Princeton All rights reserved Architectural Press—Kevin C. Lippert, publisher Printed in China First edition Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Reisley, Roland, – No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any Usonia, New York : building a community with manner without written permission from the publisher Frank Lloyd Wright / Roland Reisley with John except in the context of reviews. Timpane ; foreword by Martin Filler. p. cm. Every reasonable attempt has been made to identify isbn --- owners of copyright. Errors or omissions will be corrected . Usonian houses—New York (State)—Pleasant- in subsequent editions. ville. Utopias—New York (State)—Pleasantville— History. Architecture, Domestic—New York All photographs © Roland Reisley unless otherwise (State)—Pleasantville. Wright, Frank Lloyd, indicated. –—Criticism and interpretation. i. Title: Usonia. ii. Timpane, John Philip. iii. -
Borough of Mechanicsburg Historic District
Borough of Mechanicsburg Historic District A Reference Guide for Property Owners Contents 1 Introduction 2-3 Why preserve? 4-5 The Mechanicsburg Historic District 6 What’s the HARB? 7 Demolition 8-9 Mechanicsburg and Federal preservation guidelines 10-13 The application process 14-27 De!ning details of historic building styles 28-31 The commercial streetscape 32-33 Signs 34-47 The 10 best things you can do for your historic building 48-49 Appendix of resources This reference guide has been !nanced by a preservation projects grant from The Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission, Bureau for Historic Preservation. Additional funding was provided by the Borough of Mechanicsburg. Special thanks to: The Members of the Mechanicsburg HARB The Mechanicsburg Planning Commission Main Street Mechanicsburg Mechanicsburg Museum Association Borough of Mechanicsburg sta" Production and Design: Design LeVan Design Photography and diagrams Kenneth LeVan unless otherwise credited Technical assistance Fred Pracht Editing and coordination Ted Strosser RA of Robert A. Lack, Architecture & Design, Inc. Final Editing and coordination Tom Ludwig, Travis Kepler A REFERENCE GUIDE FOR PROPERTY OWNERS Introduction Purpose: Why this reference guide? This publication is intended to be a user friendly guide to Mechanicsburg’s Historic District and was written with current tatistics show that in the same town, houses in historic property owners, prospective property districts usually have a higher resale value than those owners, real estate agents, contractors and S not in the district. In one Pennsylvania town, Hollidaysburg, real other interested citizens in mind. Our goal estate values in the historic district have outstripped those outside by a 4 is to explain the context of and rationale to 1 ratio.