Bungalow (1910-1940)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
DATE ISSUED: August 10, 2017 REPORT NO
The City of San Diego Report to the Historical Resources Board DATE ISSUED: August 10, 2017 REPORT NO. HRB-17-047 HEARING DATE: August 24, 2017 SUBJECT: ITEM #5 – William and Carrie Old Bungalow Court RESOURCE INFO: California Historical Resources Inventory Database (CHRID) link APPLICANT: Atlas at 30th Street LLC represented by Scott A. Moomjian LOCATION: 2002-2010 30th Street, Golden Hill Community, Council District 3 APN 539-155-13-00 DESCRIPTION: Consider the designation of the William and Carrie Old Bungalow Court located at 2002-2010 30th Street as a historical resource. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Designate the William and Carrie Old Bungalow Court located at 2002-2010 30th Street as a historical resource with a period of significance of 1948 under HRB Criteria A and C. This recommendation is based on the following findings: 1. The resource is a special element of Golden Hill and San Diego’s historical and architectural development and retains integrity to its 1948 date of construction and period of significance. Specifically, the resource embodies the character defining features of a recognized variety of bungalow court, is one of a finite and limited number of bungalow courts remaining which reflect the early- to mid-20th century development of multi-family housing in Golden Hill and San Diego, and retains integrity for that association. 2. The resource embodies the distinctive characteristics through the retention of character defining features of a Minimal Traditional style bungalow court and retains a good level of architectural integrity from its 1948 date of construction and period of significance. Specifically, the resource retains an original attached full court layout; gabled roof forms with boxed eave and minimal overhang; wood shingle cladding accented with brick; multi- light wood double hung and fixed windows; and modest, compact size with simple plan forms. -
The Houses of Grant Neighborhood Salem, Oregon
The Houses of Grant Neighborhood Salem, Oregon The Houses of Grant Neighborhood By Kirsten Straus and Sean Edging City of Salem Historic Planning Division and Grant Neighborhood Association 2015 Welcome to The Grant Neighborhood! This guide was created as a way for you and your family to learn more about the historic city of Salem and within that, the historic neighborhood of Grant! This neighborhood boasts a diverse collection of beautiful and historic homes. Please use this guide to deci- pher the architectural style of your own home and learn more about why the Grant neighborhood is worth preserving. This project has been completed through a combined effort of the City of Salem Historic Planning Division, The Grant Neighborhood Association and Portland State University Professor Thomas Hubka. For more information, contact either the City of Salem Historic Plan- ning Division or The Grant Neighbor- hood Association. City of Salem Historic Planning Division Kimberli Fitzgerald: [email protected] 503-540-2397 Sally Studnar: [email protected] 503-540-2311 The Grant Neighborhood Association www.grantneighborhood.org GNA meetings are held the first Thursday of each month at the Grant Community School starting at 6:15 pm. All are welcome to at- tend! The Grant Neighborhood Contents The History of Salem and Grant Neighborhood 6 Map of The Grant Neighborhood 10 Housing Styles 12 Feature Guide 12-13 Early Settlement 14 Bungalow 18 Period Revival 24 Post WWII 28 Unique Styles and Combinations 31 Multi-Family 32 Historic Grant Buildings 34 Neighborhood Narrative 38 Designated Homes 40 Further Reading and Works Cited 42 5 The Grant Neighborhood The History of Salem and Grant According to historic records dating back to 1850, North Salem began developing in the area north of D Street. -
1962-05-10, [P ]
REALTORS REALTORS REALTORS REALTORS REALTORS REALTORS REALTORS REALTORS OPEN SAT. - SUN., 1 - 8 A HAS A HOME Rambling Websters Guaranteed Sales Plan EAST CLEVELAND - EUCLID - WICKLIFFE - WILLOUGHBY - Thunderbird This plan is designed to help you purchase your next home without the uncertainties of disposing of WILLOWICK-EASTLAKE-HIGHLAND HTS.- RICHMOND HTS. Ranchers your present homo in the usual manner. Expensive double moving interim apartment or in-low For Everyone! living; furniture storing; blanket mortgages, and various other costs or problems are eliminated. This, Office Open Daily S A.M. to 9 P.M—Closed Sundays 25 new ranch homes on Bramble briefly, is how the plan works: wood Dr., north of Blvd., 5 1. You select the Webster home of your choice, now or used, streets east of Rt. 306. Look for sign an offer te purchase eon tin- gent upon the sale or trade of your present home, and if If YOU don't see YOUR home listed below our Thunderbird sign on Blvd. you ore purchasing a new hemo Veterans nothing down, all place a temporary $100 deposit, which will hold the new home until step number 2 and 3 call NOWI We have many more. others $495. Finest buy today. are completed. 3 spacious bedrooms, IV2 baths, Upon acceptance of the offer to purchase an appointment will b* scheduled for you a* the MORE PEOPLE SIGN WITH PENAf custom built kitchen plus dining office of Webster Realty, Inc. for the purpose of applying for an FHA Conditional Commit* room; aluminum siding. East iment on your present home, which, as required, will be processed thru an accredited lending Ohio gas, city water, storm and institution. -
The Receptivity of Roofs for Solar Panels
Title: The Receptivity of Roofs for Solar Panels Author/Corresponding Author: Ian Shapiro, P.E. President Taitem Engineering, P.C. 110 S. Albany Street Ithaca, NY 14850 [email protected] v: (001) 607-277-1118 x115 f: (001) 607-277-2119 Abstract: The importance of roof design to host solar panels is increasingly recognized. Orientation, roof pitch, roof type, and a variety of obstructions all work to either make a roof receptive to solar panels, or difficult for solar panels to be installed, or something in between. This paper proposes a roof property which might be called receptivity, to characterize the degree to which a roof is or is not well-suited for solar panels. The characteristics of a receptive roof are explored. A scoring system is proposed for this property of receptivity. A variety of roof types are evaluated with the proposed scoring system, and a number of real roof examples are scored and examined. Best practices to encourage roof receptivity are offered. Keywords: solar, panel, roof, obstacle, receptivity The Receptivity of Roofs for Solar Panels 1. Introduction Roofs are a logical location for solar panels. Elevation reduces the risk of shading by the building itself, adjacent buildings, vegetation, or other sources of shadow. Limited access on a roof reduces the risk of vandalism and theft. Roofs can provide a ready- made structural support. However, roofs are generally not designed or built to host solar panels. Roof orientation, relative to the sun, is often poor. Roof-mounted building components such as chimneys, plumbing vents, and fans often interfere with a good potential solar panel location. -
Roof Framing
CHAPTER 2 ROOF FRAMING In this chapter, we will introduce you to the Intersecting fundamentals of roof design and construction. But, The intersecting roof consists of a gable and valley, before discussing roof framing, we will first review or hip and valley. The valley is formed where the two some basic terms and definitions used in roof different sections of the roof meet, generally at a 90° construction; we will then discuss the framing square angle. This type of roof is more complicated than the and learn how it’s used to solve some basic construction problems. Next, we’ll examine various types of roofs and rafters, and techniques for laying out, cutting, and erecting rafters. We conclude the chapter with a discussion of the types and parts of roof trusses. TERMINOLOGY LEARNING OBJECTIVE: Upon completing this section, you should be able to identify the types of roofs and define common roof framing terms. The primary object of a roof in any climate is protection from the elements. Roof slope and rigidness are for shedding water and bearing any extra additional weight. Roofs must also be strong enough to withstand high winds. In this section, we’ll cover the most common types of roofs and basic framing terms. TYPES OF ROOFS The most commonly used types of pitched roof construction are the gable, the hip, the intersecting, and the shed (or lean-to). An example of each is shown in figure 2-1. Gable A gable roof has a ridge at the center and slopes in two directions. It is the form most commonly used by the Navy. -
ROOF TILES Build Something Great™ ROOF TILES TECHNICAL INFORMATION GUIDE
BORAL ROOF TILES Build something great™ ROOF TILES TECHNICAL INFORMATION GUIDE December 2017 Roof Tile Manual Contents Introduction 3 Concrete Roof Tiles 31 Foreword 4 Capri SA 32 Important 4 Contour NSW, VIC 33 Quality Control 4 Linea NSW, QLD 34 Specifications 4 Linea SA 35 Local Authorities 4 Linea VIC 36 Performance 4 Macquarie NSW, VIC, QLD 37 Safety 4 Slimline NSW, VIC, QLD 38 Designer Ceramic + Terracotta 5 Striata SA 39 Concrete 5 Striata VIC 40 Roofing Terminology 6 Vogue NSW, QLD 41 Vogue SA 42 Design Considerations 11 Vogue VIC 43 Code Considerations 12 Standards 12 Accessories 45 Bushfire Attack Levels (BAL) 12 Terracotta Accessories 46 Wind Forces 12 Designer Ceramic Accessories 48 Terrain Categories 13 Concrete Accessories 49 Basic Wind Regions 14 General Accessories 50 Fixing Tile Roofs in Cyclonic Regions 15 Installation Details 51 Minimum Roof Pitch 15 Preparation for Installation 52 Maximum Rafter Lengths 15 Tile Set Out 52 Maximum Rafter Lengths - No Sarking 15 Counter Battens 55 Sarking 16 Valleys 56 Insulation 16 Fascia Height 56 Ventilation 16 Barge Height 57 Performance Characteristics 17 Anti-Ponding Boards 57 Thermal Performance 18 Laying the Roof 57 Acoustic Performance 18 Roof Tile Fixing Systems 58 Water Collection 18 Sarking 59 Testing: AS 2049 - Roof Tiles 20 Ridge Systems 60 Testing: AS 2050 - Installation of Roof Tiles 20 Ridge Installation 60 Fire Resistance 21 Hip Details 63 Valley Boards 63 Terracotta Roof Tiles 23 Sarking at Valleys 63 French 24 Valley General 64 Swiss 25 Barge/Gable Systems 64 Designer Ceramic Roof Tiles 27 Roof and Flashings Details 66 Artline 28 Bedding and Pointing 68 Shingle 29 Roof Completion 68 Wave 30 Architectural Details 69 Frequently Asked Questions 85 Contacts and Further Information 88 2 December 2017 | BORAL ROOF TILES Introduction Roof Tile Manual Introduction Foreword Local Authorities This manual has been prepared to assist the builder, architect Fixing standards and product specifications contained in this leaflet and installer, to specify, detail, prepare and install Boral roof tiles. -
Historic Architectural Treasures
TOUR Laramie & Albany County, Wyoming Historic architectural treasures of the gem city of the plains TOUR Laramie & Albany County, Wyoming Welcome! Once upon a time, kings and queens embarked upon royal These turbulent early years of the Gem City of the Plains (a tours to visit the distant corners of their realm. Today we invite nickname bestowed in the early 1870s by the publisher of a you to walk no more than a few short blocks to meet Laramie’s local newspaper) left a colorful legacy that continues to attract special brand of “royalty” – magnificent Victorian, Queen visitors to Laramie’s historic downtown, its museums, and those Anne, and Tudor homes, the crown jewels of our town’s rich same Victorian homes, many of which are now listed in the architectural heritage. Each of our three tours combines a National Register of Historic Places. variety of these and other architectural styles but has a unique flavor all its own. We hope you have fun while walking on these tours that take you to some of our most architecturally historic homes. Some From its beginning, Laramie was a railroad town, and, like are prominently located on busy streets where passing traffic other “Hell-on-Wheels” towns, its early history was violent and rarely slows to admire their splendor; others are wonderful spectacular. Named for a French trapper, Jacques LaRamie, it old gems on quiet neighborhood streets, their outstanding was also one of the few end-of-the-tracks encampments along architectural elements sometimes obscured by century-old trees. the route that survived. -
Guidelines at a Glance: Semi-Detached Houses
Guidelines at a Glance: Semi-Detached Houses The table below is intended to provide an overview of the key guidelines applicable for the development type. The full details of the guidelines are stated in the relevant tabs of this handbook. Parameter Guidelines Plot Size and Semi-Detached Houses (Side-to- Semi-Detached Houses (Back-to- Width side) back) (minimum) Size: 200sqm Size: 200sqm Width: 8m Width: 10m Refer to Plot Size and Width section for allowable variations Building Road Buffer/Green Buffer Setbacks Main building: Cat 1 Road: 24m (incl. 5m green buffer) Cat 2 Road: 12m (incl. 5m green buffer) Cat 3 & 4 Road: 7.5m (incl. 3m green buffer) Cat 5 Road: 7.5m (no green buffer) Patio/Terrace/Car porch roof eaves: Cat 1-2 Road: Maximum depth of car porch protrusion into the road buffer shall not exceed 5m. Cat 3-5 Road: 2.4m Setback from Common Boundaries Main building, car porch column, patio/terrace: 2m Main roof eaves, car porch roof eaves: 1m The prevailing GCBA setback requirements (ie 3m and 1.6m) shall apply to a landed housing plot if it abuts a Good Class Bungalow Area. Refer to Ancillary Structures and Building Appendages Building Main roof eaves Appendages Into road buffer: 2m (maximum Into common boundary setback: 1m projection into setback areas) Cantilevered ledges/ lightweight awnings: Into road buffer: 1m Into common boundary setback: 1m Parameter Guidelines Horizontal sun-shading devices or vertical fins (without supports), planter boxes: Into road buffer: 0.5m Into common boundary setback: Not allowed Bay windows Into road buffer: Not allowed Into common boundary setback: Not allowed A 3m setback requirement shall apply to the landed housing plot if it abuts a Good Class Bungalow Area (GCBA). -
Housing Choices Guide Book
Housing Choices Guide Book A VISUAL GUIDE TO COMPACT HOUSING TYPES IN NORTHWEST OREGON This project is partially funded by a grant from the Transportation and Growth Management (“TGM”) Program, a joint program of the Oregon Department of Transportation and the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development. This TGM grant is financed, in part, by federal Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST-Act), local government, and the State of Oregon funds. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect views or policies of the State of Oregon. urbs w o r k s TABLE OF CONTENTS Rowhouse 7 Narrow-lot 13 Cottages 17 ADU 25 Plexes 29 Courtyard Apartment 35 Multi-dwelling 39 WELCOME Welcome to the Housing Choices Guidebook—a visual guide to compact housing types in Northwest Oregon. This Guidebook presents an illustrated catalogue of local examples of compact medium- and high-density housing. This document provides over forty examples of duplexes, cottages, small apartments, courtyard apartments, and rowhouses that demonstrate the wide variety of housing that exists in Northwest Oregon. While the average household has fewer people than in the past, most housing being built is detached single dwellings on large lots (5,000 square feet and above). The examples in this booklet show that there are many examples of financially feasible, popular, and well-designed housing that is smaller in footprint, more compact in design, and that offer many choices for different kinds of households and families. The homes in this document are found in a wide variety of locations including in large cities and small towns; as part of new multi-acre developments or greenfield; or tucked into existing neighborhoods on lots that are a fraction of an acre (infill). -
Property Type Definitions
Benchmark Home Definitions Benchmark homes are representative of standardized homes for specific sub areas. Their physical characteristics remain fixed over time. Benchmark property attributes are formulated for each sub area for Benchmark housing categories that have a significant presence in a sub-area. The following describes general characteristics for each Benchmark housing category and for selected composites of categories: NOTE: MLS® HPI data published by CREA for one- and two-storey single family homes (and for the single family composite) include detached and attached properties. By comparison, MLS® HPI data for single family homes published by Greater Vancouver and Fraser Valley real estate boards in their local market areas include only detached properties. Differences in property coverage may result in MLS® data variances for single family homes as published by CREA and the aforementioned real estate boards. One-storey single family homes: A property with one floor above ground. This type of property is characterized by the bedrooms, kitchen and dining rooms being on the same floor; the utility room and laundry room are generally located below ground. Special attention is made to raised bungalows, where the basement is partially above ground and where the room distribution provides criteria for its assignment to the appropriate Benchmark housing category. This includes Property Styles submitted by participating Real Estate Boards labeled as: Back Split, Bi-Level, Bungalow, Hillside Bungalow, Hillside Split, 2 Storey Split and 3 Level Split. This type of property does not differentiate between attached and detached homes. Two-storey single family homes: A property with two, or more, above ground floors. -
D.2 Residential Styles and Forms the Single-Family Dwelling in The
D.2 Residential Styles and Forms The single-family dwelling in the suburban Washington, D.C. region is the dominant residential subtype within each community type. These structures comprise the individual residential resources of suburban neighborhoods and developments. Single-family dwellings were built of nearly every construction material. The detached single-family house was constructed individually by commission or speculation, in groups of small to D-14 large-scale development sometimes using prefabricated technology. The anticipated architectural styles and forms of single-family dwellings in the suburbs include: the I- house, vernacular residences, Victorian-era houses, Colonial Revival house, Tudor Revival house, Four-square, Bungalow, Cape Cod cottage, ranch dwelling, and split-level house. Despite the predominance of single-family residences in the suburbs, multi-family structures became a cost-effective and popular housing solution from the Industrial/Urban Dominance Period through the Modern Period. D.2.1 Agricultural-Industrial Transition Period (1815-1870) Residential buildings during this early period were constructed on the fringes of the city, in rural crossroads villages, along major routes of travel, and on modest farms, as well as large estates. The variety of residential suburban settings resulted in a wide range of building forms and styles constructed during this period. The most common suburban residential resource of this period was the vernacular building. Nineteenth century vernacular residences are characterized by simple ornamentation and mass-produced components, such as door frames, moldings, sash and window units, and porch decoration. In general, a vernacular residence was a layman’s response to the architectural styles and technologies that were popular and well-accepted while the residence was being built. -
Architectural Patterns
Architectural Patterns Architectural Patterns Roanoke’s houses and their respective patterns reflect the periods of development and the changing tastes and livelihoods of the residents who built them. The following section helps homeowners and builders recognize Roanoke’s residential architecture patterns by identifying the key components of each form. Character-defining features of each pattern are examined with attention to massing, roof forms, wall cladding, porches, doors, and windows. Architectural details are illustrated with graphics and photographs of Roanoke houses. With a little practice, anyone can recognize these elements that typify the houses and neighborhoods of Roanoke. The architectural patterns discussed in the Pattern Book are not exclusive to Roanoke. They are found in cities across the United States. An ability to recognize the repeating architectural patterns that link a house to its neighborhood, and its place in the city’s development, enables people to appreciate a house’s history and architectural character, and make informed decisions regarding renovation, additions and new construction in a specific neighborhood. For example, the Downtown urban core is rich in Queen Anne and Colonial Revival, while the later Traditional neighborhoods feature Tudor Revival, Bungalow, and Foursquare houses. The Ranch houses and continuing styles of Colonial Revival reflect the Post-World II Suburban neighborhoods. The matrix on the following page will help you identify which architectural patterns are typically found in each neighborhood classification. (To determine your neighborhood’s classification, please refer to Neighborhood Patterns.) Stylistic Mixtures In a region like the Roanoke Valley, stylistic categories can become blurred. While many houses in Roanoke have been built in distinct, recognizable architectural styles, other houses have multiple characteristics, and do not fit neatly into one category.