DOCSLIB.ORG

Ndcrs Site Form Training Manual: Architectural Sites

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ndcrs Site Form Training Manual: Architectural Sites NDCRS SITE FORM TRAINING MANUAL: ARCHITECTURAL SITES By J. Signe Snortland, L. Martin Perry, Lauren McCroskey, Fern E. Swenson, Amy C. Bleier, Lorna B. Meidinger Division of Archeology & Historic Preservation State Historical Society of North Dakota North Dakota Heritage Center & State Museum Bismarck, North Dakota https://www.history.nd.gov/hp/index.html 2020 Entire contents copyrighted 2020 State Historical Society of North Dakota All rights reserved Produced by the Division of Archeology and Historic Preservation, State Historical Society of North Dakota Cover photo: Former Governor’s Mansion State Historic Site (32BL17), Burleigh County. Victorian Stick Style, constructed in 1884. Location: 320 E. Ave B, Bismarck, North Dakota. NDCRS Architectural Site Form Manual—2020 Page 2 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 6 NDCRS AND GIS ...................................................................................................................... 6 CULTURAL HERITAGE FORM .............................................................................................. 7 HOW TO COMPLETE A NDCRS SITE FORM....................................................................... 7 Defined Non-Sites and Property Types Requiring No Formal Documentation ..................... 8 General Rules for Completion of NDCRS Site Forms ........................................................... 9 PDF Site Forms ..................................................................................................................... 10 Steps to Digitally Complete a Site Form .............................................................................. 10 How to Change Information (UPDATE) .............................................................................. 10 Site Leads .................................................................................................................................. 10 NDCRS ARCHITECTURAL SITE FORM ................................................................................. 12 Bridges ...................................................................................................................................... 12 Accuracy and Order .................................................................................................................. 12 NDCRS ARCHITECTURAL SITE FORM ................................................................................. 13 SITE IDENTIFICATION ......................................................................................................... 13 SITS# ........................................................................................................................................ 13 FIELD CODE ........................................................................................................................... 14 SITE NAME ............................................................................................................................. 14 MAP QUAD ............................................................................................................................. 14 LEGAL DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................... 14 LTL ....................................................................................................................................... 15 TOWNSHIP, RANGE, SECTION ....................................................................................... 17 SUBSECTION—QQQ/QQ/Q .............................................................................................. 17 NAD, UTM, ZONE .................................................................................................................. 17 CITY ......................................................................................................................................... 17 STREET NUMBER AND STREET NAME ............................................................................ 18 URBAN LEGAL DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................... 18 TOTAL # OF ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES ..................................................................... 18 Definitions: ........................................................................................................................... 18 FIELDWORK DATE ............................................................................................................... 19 SURVEY TYPE........................................................................................................................ 19 PROJECT NAME AND PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR ....................................................... 19 CONTRACTING FIRM OR AGENCY ................................................................................... 20 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ............................................................................................. 20 RECORDED BY AND DATE RECORDED .......................................................................... 20 NDCRS Architectural Site Form Manual—2020 Page 3 SHSND USE ................................................................................................................................. 21 STUDY UNIT ........................................................................................................................... 21 COMPONENT .......................................................................................................................... 21 VERIFIED SITE ....................................................................................................................... 21 CR TYPE .................................................................................................................................. 21 NDCRS ARCHITECTURAL SITE FORM—PAGE 2 ................................................................ 23 FEATURE DATA .................................................................................................................... 23 ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE # ........................................................................................... 23 CONSTRUCTION DATE ........................................................................................................ 23 FEATURE DATE ..................................................................................................................... 28 STRUCTURAL SYSTEM........................................................................................................ 28 ETHNICITY ............................................................................................................................. 31 FEATURE TYPE...................................................................................................................... 32 CONTEXT ................................................................................................................................ 32 PRIMARY EXTERIOR AND SECONDARY EXTERIOR .................................................... 37 CONDITION ............................................................................................................................ 37 PLAN SHAPE .......................................................................................................................... 38 ARCHITECT / BUILDER ........................................................................................................ 39 STYLE ...................................................................................................................................... 39 Other Styles ........................................................................................................................... 40 Residential Styles .................................................................................................................. 41 Commercial Styles ................................................................................................................ 80 OTHER INFORMATION ........................................................................................................ 85 STORIES .................................................................................................................................. 85 FOUNDATION MATERIALS ................................................................................................ 85 WINDOW CONDITION .......................................................................................................... 85 ROOF / CORNICE ................................................................................................................... 86 DATING METHODS ............................................................................................................... 88 FEATURE PRESERVATION RECOMMENDATION .......................................................... 88 GUIDELINES FOR FEATURE PRESERVATION RECOMMENDATION..................... 88 BRIDGES—PAGE 2A ................................................................................................................. 90 NDDOT PROJECT # ................................................................................................................ 90 BRIDGE TYPE, TRUSS TYPE AND SUBTYPE ................................................................... 90 MATERIALS, CONDITION ................................................................................................... 91 ADDITIONAL
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RACE, SPACE, and PLACE: the RELATION BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL MODERNISM, POST-MODERNISM, URBAN PLANNING, and GENTRIFICATION Keith A
    RACE, SPACE, AND PLACE: THE RELATION BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL MODERNISM, POST-MODERNISM, URBAN PLANNING, AND GENTRIFICATION Keith Aoki * [Cite as: 20 Fordham Urb. L.J. 699 (1993)] Introduction Gentrification in United States urban housing markets of the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s continues to be a controversial and complex phenomenon. [FN1] During the past twenty years, gentrification's effects on the core cities of the U.S. have been analyzed and evaluated many times over. [FN2] Descriptions of gentrification have spanned the ideological *700 spectrum, from laudatory embraces of gentrification as the solution to urban decline to denunciatory critiques of gentrification as another symptom of the widening gulf between the haves and the have- nots in America. [FN3] This Article critiques gentrification, adding an additional explanatory element to the ongoing account of the dynamics of American cities in the 1990s. The additional element is the relevance of a major aesthetic realignment in architecture and urban planning from a modernist to a post-modernist ideology in the 1970s and 1980s. This shift involved an aesthetic and economic revaluation of historical elements in older central city buildings, which accelerated the rate of gentrification, displacement, and abandonment. This Article describes how certain shifts in the aesthetic ideology [FN4] of urban planners and architects affected suburban and urban spatial distribution in the United States during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. These ideological shifts arose from deeply embedded American attitudes toward city and rural life that had emerged in American town planning and architectural theory and practice by the mid-nineteenth century. Part I of this Article examines the emergence of an anti-urban Arcadian strand in nineteenth century American town planning rhetoric.
    [Show full text]
  • Architectural Resourcesresources
    CHAPTER2 ARCHITECTURALARCHITECTURAL RESOURCESRESOURCES Key features of historic resources should be preserved. This chapter presents a historic overview and identifies the key features of architectural styles found in San Jose: • Vernacular or National p. 17 • Italianate and Italianate Cottage p. 18 • Greek Revival p. 19 • Carpenter Gothic or Folk Victorian p. 19 • Queen Anne p. 20 • Stick p. 21 • Shingle p. 22 • Neoclassical p. 23 • Colonial Revival p. 24 • Dutch Colonial Revival p. 24 • Craftsman p. 25 • Bungalow p. 26 • Prairie p. 27 • Tudor Revival p. 28 • Mission Revival p. 28 • Spanish Eclectic or Spanish Colonial Revival or Mediterranean Revival p. 29 • Italian Renaissance p. 30 • Art Deco p. 30 • Art Moderne p. 31 • International p. 31 • Mid-Century Modern p. 32 Guide for Preserving San Jose Homes Chapter 2: Architectural Resources CHAPTER 2 ARCHITECTURALARCHITECTURAL RESOURCESRESOURCES Individual building features are important to the character of San Jose. The mass and scale, form, materials and architectural details of the buildings are the elements that distinguish one architectural style from another, or even older neighborhoods from newer developments. This chapter presents an overview of those important elements of the built environment which make up San Jose. This includes a brief history of development, as well as a summary of the different types and styles of architecture found in its neighborhoods. Brief History Vendome neighborhood, just to the northwest of the The settlement of the Santa Clara Valley by Euro- present-day Hensley Historic District. This original site Americans began in 1769 with an initial exploration was subjected to severe winter flooding during the first of the valley by Spanish explorers.
    [Show full text]
  • Teori Arsitektur 03
    •Victorian architecture 1837 and 1901 UK •Neolithic architecture 10,000 BC-3000 BC •Jacobethan 1838 •Sumerian architecture 5300 BC-2000 BC •Carpenter Gothic USA and Canada 1840s on •Soft Portuguese style 1940-1955 Portugal & colonies •Ancient Egyptian architecture 3000 BC-373 AD •Queenslander (architecture) 1840s–1960s •Ranch-style 1940s-1970s USA •Classical architecture 600 BC-323 AD Australian architectural styles •New towns 1946-1968 United Kingdom Ancient Greek architecture 776 BC-265 BC •Romanesque Revival architecture 1840–1900 USA •Mid-century modern 1950s California, etc. Roman architecture 753 BC–663 AD •Neo-Manueline 1840s-1910s Portugal & Brazil •Florida Modern 1950s or Tropical Modern •Architecture of Armenia (IVe s - XVIe s) •Neo-Grec 1848 and 1865 •Googie architecture 1950s USA •Merovingian architecture 400s-700s France and Germany •Adirondack Architecture 1850s New York, USA •Brutalist architecture 1950s–1970s •Anglo-Saxon architecture 450s-1066 England and Wales •Bristol Byzantine 1850-1880 •Structuralism 1950s-1970s •Byzantine architecture 527 (Sofia)-1520 •Second Empire 1865 and 1880 •Metabolist Movement 1959 Japan •Islamic Architecture 691-present •Queen Anne Style architecture 1870–1910s England & USA •Arcology 1970s-present •Carolingian architecture 780s-800s France and Germany Stick Style 1879-1905 New England •Repoblación architecture 880s-1000s Spain •Structural Expressionism 1980s-present Eastlake Style 1879-1905 New England •Ottonian architecture 950s-1050s Germany Shingle Style 1879-1905 New England •Postmodern architecture 1980s •Russian architecture 989-1700s •National Park Service Rustic 1872–present USA •Romanesque architecture 1050-1100 •Deconstructivism 1982–present •Chicago school (architecture) 1880s and 1890 USA •Norman architecture 1074-1250 •Memphis Group 1981-1988 •Neo-Byzantine architecture 1882–1920s American •Blobitecture 2003–present •Gothic architecture •Art Nouveau/Jugendstil c.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Preservation Study and Evaluation
    Golden HHI Planned District Historic Preservation Study and Evaluation Prepared for the City of San Diego Planning Department and Historical Site Board by CIANI AND SOMERVILLE DESIGN ASSOCIATES Architectural and Historic Preservation Consultants La Jolla, California April, 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUMEl 1. Introduction 1 2. Methodology 2 3. Historical Background 15 4. Evaluation 24 5. Recommendations and Conclusions 31 6. List of Maps 35 1. Bibliography and References 36 8. Acknowledgements 40 it CONTENTS OF VOLUME II HISTORIC RESOURCE INVENTORY Russ Blvd. B Street Broadway A Street C Street CONTENTS OF VOLUME III HISTORIC RESOURCE INVENTORY E Street Avenido Cerro Gordo 20th Street F Street Treat Street 21st Street Glendale Ave. 19th Street CONTENTS OF VOLUME IV HISTORIC RESOURCE INVENTORY 22nd Street 25th Street 28th Street 23rd Street 26th Street 24th Street 27th Street iii Vicinity k c.., .,K 'l: \[\ C; 'N '" ~ ~ '"II) corcmado GOLDEN HILL PLANNED DISTRICT jv 1 Introduction TIlerefore, our review of the cultural context is a summary of work by others, and is provided TIlis survey has been conducted for the City of San as an overview of the social history of the Diego Planning Department and the community of greater Golden Hill area. Golden Hill, with special consideration for the perceived goal of producing a canprehensive evalua­ TIlis study of the Planned District provides tion and documentation of all cultural resources an assessment of the architectural styles and located within the Golden Hill Planned District. periods of the survey area, and an evaluation TIle canpletion of this survey brings the community of significance arrong the surveyed sites, objects, a step closer to irrplerrenting the goals of the and structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Dictionary of Architecture
    ARTS • ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Historical Dictionaries of Literature and the Arts, No. 29 PALMER HISTORICAL DICTIONARY OF Architecture, which can be understood in its most basic sense as a form of enclosure created with an aesthetic intent, first made its appearance in the Prehistoric Age. From its earliest developments, architecture changed over time and in different cultures in response to changing cultural needs, aesthetic interests, materials, and techniques. Architecture The Historical Dictionary of Architecture provides information on architects HISTORICAL such as Frank Lloyd Wright, Tadao Ando, Leon Battista Alberti, Filippo DICTIONARY Brunelleschi, Michelangelo, and Konstantin Stepanovich Melnikov, as well as OF A on famous structures such as the Acropolis, the Colosseum, the Forbidden City, Machu Pichu, Notre Dame, the Pyramids of Giza, Stonehenge, and the World Trade Center. The dictionary examines the development of architecture rchitecture over the centuries through a chronology, an introductory essay, a bibliography, and hundreds of cross-referenced dictionary entries on the major architects, well-known buildings, time periods, styles, building types, and materials in world architecture. Allison Lee Palmer is professor of art history at the University of Oklahoma. For orders and information please contact the publisher SCARECROW PRESS, INC. A wholly owned subsidiary of The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc. 4501 Forbes Boulevard, Suite 200 ISBN-13: 978-0-8108-5821-3 Lanham, Maryland 20706 ISBN-10: 0-8108-5821-5 1-800-462-6420 • fax 717-794-3803 ALLISON LEE PALMER www.scarecrowpress.com COVER IMAGE © SCPHOTOS / ALAMY HD Architecture.indd 1 8/11/08 11:16:24 AM Historical Dictionaries of Literature and the Arts Jon Woronoff, Series Editor 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Themes Established
    Figure 116 View west of Route 30 Heritage landscapes The Town of Northampton is known for its rich and varied landscapes, which are represented in its 22,208 acres of the Sacandaga River Valley. Heritage landscapes are places that are created by human interaction with the natural environment. They are dynamic and evolving; they reflect the history of the community and provide a sense of place; they show the natural ecology that influenced land use patterns; and they often have scenic qualities. These landscapes are the core of each community’s character; yet heritage landscapes are vulnerable and ever changing. For this reason it is important to take steps toward their preservation by identifying those landscapes that are particularly valued by the community — for example, a favorite local farm, a distinctive neighborhood or mill village, a unique natural feature, or a river corridor. This portion of the survey helps identify a wide range of different types of landscape resources, particularly those that are significant and unprotected. Burials Gifford Valley Located in the small community of Gifford Valley, near the Town of Benson Cemetery Kings Cemetery Located just south of Sacandaga Park Northampton Cemetery Located in Fish House; the oldest cemetery Northville Cemetery Located in the Village of Northville Presbyterian Cemetery Located in Fish House Prospect Hill Located on the top of Main Street on Prospect Hill Cemetery ~ 83 ~ Porter, Sweet, Warner Plot Small family plots located in Gifford Valley Lewis Family Plot Small family plot located in Gifford Valley on private land St. Joseph’s Catholic Located in Fish House as part of the Northampton Cemetery Cemetery Ridge Road Cemetery Located off Ridge Road near Carpenter’s Corner, west side of CR113 Industrial (visible) Tourist establishments along Rt.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding & Preserving Historic Resources
    CHAPTER 3 Understanding and Preserving Historic Resources I. Introduction therefore, has to be placed on preserving what exists - repairing porches Madison's Historic Preservation Ordinance is designed to protect the rather than replacing them, keeping original siding whenever possible, overall character and appearance of the town. This applies to individual retaining an old outbuilding when a new one might seem the easier historic properties as well as to more general features, such as open spaces, solution. The Commission is concerned with promoting this understanding sidewalks, retaining walls, outbuildings, and the many other details that - not rigidly enforcing, such an approach, but stressing that it is always add up to create the community's general image. Individual historic better to keep something authentic and original than to replace it with a buildings, however, whether large houses and institutional buildings or facsimile, at least within reasonable bounds. small cottages and outbuildings, form the major elements in the town, and The Historic Preservation Commission is also charged with ensuring the more than anything else help to define the overall historic character of vitality and continued life of the historic district. Some historic towns and Madison. Special care and understanding of these buildings, therefore, is a cities have adopted policies that prohibit change. They attempt to freeze a prime ingredient in the preservation of the town and a major concern of town or neighborhood at a particular moment in time. Madison's Historic the Historic District Commission in its review of changes within the Preservation Ordinance recognizes that the town is a growing and changing district.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 1 Introduction and Survey Implementation
    Uptown Historic Architectural and Cultural Landscape Reconnaissance Survey Introduction and Survey Implementation Chapter 1 CHAPTER 1 Introduction and Survey Implementation 3 ♦ IS Architecture, Ione R. Stiegler, Architect, AIA ♦ ♦ 5649 La Jolla Blvd, La Jolla, California 92037 ♦ ♦ Vonn Marie May - Cultural Landscape Specialist ♦ Uptown Historic Architectural and Cultural Landscape Reconnaissance Survey Introduction and Survey Implementation Chapter 1 ----- Page Left Intentionally Blank ----- 4 ♦ IS Architecture, Ione R. Stiegler, Architect, AIA ♦ ♦ 5649 La Jolla Blvd, La Jolla, California 92037 ♦ ♦ Vonn Marie May - Cultural Landscape Specialist ♦ Uptown Historic Architectural and Cultural Landscape Reconnaissance Survey Introduction and Survey Implementation Chapter 1 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction................................................................................................................ 6 1.1 Survey Purpose and Scope.........................................................................................6 1.2 Survey Type..................................................................................................................8 1.3 Project Area................................................................................................................10 2.0 Implementation of The Architectural Reconnaissance Survey ................ 12 2. 1 Phase One: Preparations for Field Reconnaissance ..............................................12 2.1.1 Meetings ..........................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Balboa Park Historic Context Statement
    Draft - 8/3/08 Historic Context Statement Balboa Park Area Plan & Historic Resource Survey San Francisco, California August 3 2008 Prepared for the San Francisco Planning Department prepared by TBA West, Inc. 631 Pointe Pacific Drive #6, Daly City, California 94014 650.756.8888 / www.tbaarchitects.com 1 Draft - 8/3/08 Table of Contents I. Introduction and Theme…………………………………………………………...3 A. Time Period B. Period of Significance C. Geographic Limits II. Synthesis of Information/History 6 A. Natural History B. Native Americans C. Spanish-Mexican Periods D. American Period 1. The Industrial School 2. House of Correction/Ingleside Jail 3. San Francisco and San Jose Railroad 4. Ocean Avenue Corridor a. Ingleside Coursing Park b. Ingleside Jail 5. Residential Development 6. Balboa Park - a Rationalistic park 7. Balboa Park Area Transportation History 8. Westwood Park 9. Commercial Development 10. Demographic Patterns III. Balboa Park Area Plan: Architecture 26 A. Property Types B. Commercial Corridors C. Architectural Styles in Subject Area IV. Bibliography……………………………………………………………………..47 V. Appendices 48 A. Study Area Map B. Inventory of Construction Dates, Type, Styles C. Inventory of Character Defining Features 2 Draft - 8/3/08 Exhibit 1: Subject Area, 1878 map of San Francisco, UCLA. I. Introduction and Themes The Balboa Park Area (Subject Area) acts as a hub and boundary line in San Francisco, a crossroad between the Ingleside, Westwood Park, Sunnyside, Excelsior and Outer Mission neighborhoods. It also acts as a crossroad of historic themes: Balboa Park embodies distinctive characteristics of 20th Century recreational landscaping, as naturalistic, romantic treatments of city parks gave way to more rationalistic uses, including the incorporation of civic structures and game fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Architectural Preservation District Guidelines Town of Ipswich
    Architectural Preservation District Guidelines Town of Ipswich Massachusetts Adopted May 4, 2016 Table of Contents I. BACKGROUND…………………………………….………….………….…. 2 II. HOW TO USE THESE GUIDELINES……………..………………………. 3 A. General…………………………………………………………………….. 3 B. Resources and Application Process……………………………………….. 3 III. DEFINITIONS……………………………………………………………….. 7 IV. DESIGN REVIEW STANDARDS……………………………...…………… 12 A. Design Standards for New Construction, Alterations or Expansions……… 12 B. Design Recommendations for Restoration, Renovation or Additions……… 12 C. Windows and Doors………………………………………………………… 13 D. Sheathing and Trim……………………….………………………………... 14 E. Roofing……………………………………………………………………... 15 F. Cellars and Foundations………...…………………………………………... 15 G. Paint Colors…………………………..……………………………………... 16 V. IDENTIFYING IPSWICH ARCHITECTURE………..…………………… 17 A. Preamble. First Period (Post-Medieval) Houses, 1635 to c. 1725…….…… 17 B. Features Common to First and Second Period Houses…………………….. 17 C. Terminology: First Period or Post-Medieval Houses…………………....... 17 D. Common Features………………………………………………….………. 18 E. First Period Summary……………………………………………….……... 24 F. Second or Georgian Period………………………………………………… 25 G. Second Period Summary…………………………………………………… 28 H. Federal Period……………………………………………………………… 29 I. Federal Period Summary……………………………………………………31 J. Greek Revival Period………………………………………………………. 32 K. Greek Revival Period Summary…………………………………………… 34 L. Victorian Period In All Its Variety…………………………………………. 35 M. The Gothic or Pointed Style, 1840-1880………………………………...… 35
    [Show full text]
  • Architectural Styles, Vernacular Architecture, Construction Materials and Methods, and Agricultural Outbuildings
    INTRODUCTION OVERVIEW Wisconsin architecture has developed considerably since the first shelters were built by fur traders, missionaries, and early settlers. The varied immigrant and native stock that populated the state and the wealth of natural resources available lent a diversity to Wisconsin building stock nearly unsurpassed in the nation. In this section, Wisconsin architecture is summarized from four perspectives: architectural styles, vernacular architecture, construction materials and methods, and agricultural outbuildings. Each of the four categories is approached from the variety of types that occur in Wisconsin. In the cases of architectural styles and construction materials and methods, the Wisconsin perspective is tempered by a national perspective summarized from various secondary sources (see bibliographies). The sections concerning vernacular architecture and agricultural outbuildings are approached nearly exclusively from a Wisconsin perspective. Because information is not as readily available concerning these aspects of architectural history, the Historic Preservation Division staff formulated the terminology to assist field surveyors and data entry staff. The secondary sources and manuscripts listed in the bibliographies were essential to the development of the types presented. The descriptions presented in all four sections should be useful in establishing historical and architectural contexts for evaluation purposes and for determining levels of significance, similar to the "Historical Background" sections throughout the rest of the report. However, the architecture summaries are not nearly as complete as the "Historical Background" sections. At present, analysis of Wisconsin's architecture is limited by a lack of scholarly research and field studies. The' intensive survey reports that have been prepared for several communities have greatly increased available knowledge of Wisconsin architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a – Santa Ana Architectural Styles
    FINAL DRAFT APPENDIX A – SANTA ANA ARCHITECTURAL STYLES Tudor Revival APPENDIX A English Revival Variant Italian Renaissance Revival SANTA ANA ARCHITECTURAL Mission/Spanish Colonial Revival TYLES Mission Revival Variant S Spanish Colonial Variant Monterrey Variant A wide variety of architectural styles exist Moderne within Santa Ana. It is important to Art Deco understand the characteristics of these styles International Style and the various design details that help Minimalist Traditional define a particular style. This section will Ranch briefly describe and illustrate the predominant architectural styles in Santa In addition, the non-Residential interpretation of Ana. the following architectural styles discussed in this Appendix include; To assist the user, this Appendix is organized in two sections. The first section discusses Richardsonian Romanesque the architectural styles in the residential Shingle application, while the second section Italian Renaissance discusses the styles in its non-residential Colonial Revival interpretation. Georgian Variant Classical Revival Each of the architectural styles listed below Mission/Spanish Colonial Revival are found in varying degrees in Santa Ana. Churrigueuresque Variant A general description1 and character Beaux Arts defining elements of each of the styles Commercial Style follows the list. Residential interpretation of Art Deco architectural styles discussed include: International Style Italianate (Late Victorian) Stick/Eastlake (Late Victorian) Queen Anne (Late Victorian) Shingle
    [Show full text]