Historic Architecture in Kansas

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Historic Architecture in Kansas Historic Architecture in Kansas “…In old buildings we glimpse the world of previous generations” ~ Stewart Brand, How Buildings Learn Background • Statehood: 1861 • Much of Kansas did not develop permanent settlements • Earliest permanent settlement until after the Civil War. in eastern Kansas • Development of railroad brought new types of building materials. • Pattern books emerge • Architecture emerges as a field of study in American universities First Buildings - Log First Buildings - Stone First Buildings - Stone Architectural Forms Architectural Styles Late 19th Century Styles Gothic Revival Italianate Second Empire Stick Queen Anne Shingle Richardsonian Romanesque Folk Victorian Architectural Styles Gothic Revival (1840-1880) • Steeply pitched roof, – Cross Gables • Decorative Gables – Vergeboards • Wall surface extends into the gables without a break • Pointed Arch windows Amelia Earhart Birthplace – Atchison, Atchison County (c. 1861) Architectural Styles Gothic Revival (1840-1880) Natoma Presbyterian Church – Osborne County (c. 1898) St. Joseph’s Catholic Church – Geary County (c. 1910) Architectural Styles Gothic Revival (1840-1880) Collegiate Gothic - later Ottawa Junior High School – Ottawa, Franklin County (c. 1917) Campbell Building – Harper, Harper County (c. 1881) Architectural Styles Second Empire (1855-1885) • Mansard Roof – Dormers windows on steep lower slope • Molded cornices • Decorative brackets under eaves Balie Waggener House – Atchison, Atchison County (c. 1879) Architectural Styles Second Empire (1855-1885) Tremont Hotel – Fort Scott, Bourbon County (c. 1871) S. T. Zimmerman House – Lawrence, Douglas County (c. 1869) Architectural Styles Italianate (1840-1885) • Two to Three Stories • Low-pitched roof • Wide overhanging eaves supported by brackets • Tall narrow windows – Commonly arched – Curved window crowns • Some have a square Charles Duncan House – Lawrence, Douglas County (c. 1869) cupola or tower Architectural Styles Italianate (1840-1885) Nials Rial House – Baxter Springs, Cherokee County (c. 1870) Gold Dust Hotel – Fredonia, Wilson County (c. 1884-1885) Architectural Styles Stick Style (1860-1890) • Steeply pitched, gabled roof – Usually with Cross Gables • Wood Wall Cladding interrupted by patterns of horizontal, vertical or diagonal boards (stickwork) Potwin Neighborhood Residence – Topeka, Shawnee County Architectural Styles Queen Anne (1880-1910) • Irregular Shape • Steeply-pitched roof • Usually a dominant front-facing gable • Various wall textures • Bay Windows • Asymmetrical • Partial or full-width, Potwin Neighborhood Residence – Topeka, Shawnee County one-story, porches Architectural Styles Queen Anne (1880-1910) Market Street Cottage – Wichita, Sedgwick County (c. 1888) Holyoke Cottage – Wichita, Sedgwick County (c. 1888) Architectural Styles Queen Anne – Free Classic (1890-1910) Smith House – Wellington, Sumner County (c. 1896) • Queen Anne house form Carlgren House – Courtland, Republic County (c. 1904) • Simplified details • Classical columns & elements Architectural Styles Shingle Style (1880-1910) • Wood shingled walls without interruption at corners • Asymmetrical façade with irregular roof • Intersecting gables and multi-level eaves W. W. Finney House – Emporia, Lyon County (c. 1908) Architectural Styles Shingle Style (1880-1910) Wynkoop House – Highland, Doniphan County (1912) Francis White House – Manhattan, Riley County (c. 1891) Architectural Styles Richardsonian Romanesque (1880-1900) • Round-Topped Arches occurring over windows, porch supports or entrance • Masonry walls usually with rough-faced, squared stonework • Some have round towers with conical roofs 427 Main – Seneca, Nemaha County (c. 1889) • Asymmetrical Architectural Styles Folk Victorian (1870-1910) • Victorian decorative detailing on simple folk hosue forms • Porches with spindlework and Victorian details • Cornice-line brackets • Side gabled; gable-front- and-wing; gable-front • One or two stories Architectural Styles Folk Victorian (1870-1910) Foster House – Gardner, Johnson County (c. 1893) Architectural Styles Early 20th Century Styles Colonial Revival Neoclassical / Classical Revival Tudor Revival Beaux Arts / French Eclectic Prairie Craftsman Mid-Century Modern Architectural Styles Colonial Revival (1895-1955) • Accentuated front door – Decorative crown (pediment) – Pilasters – Fanlights & sidelights • Symmetrical Façade • Double-hung, multi- light window sashes Architectural Styles Dutch Colonial Revival (1900-1925) • Often side-gabled • Gambrel roof Burr House – Dodge City, Ford County Architectural Styles Spanish Colonial Revival (1910-1930) 805 Spruceway - Abilene, Dickinson County 106 Naroma Court – Abilene, Dickinson County Architectural Styles Neoclassical (1895-1950) • Façade dominated by full-height porch with roof supported by classical columns • Symmetrical • Centered Door George Mackie House – Lawrence, Douglas County (c. 1917) Architectural Styles Tudor Revival (1890-1940) • Steeply pitched roof • Side gabled – Façade dominated by one or more prominent cross gables • Decorative Half- Timbering • Tall, narrow windows • Massive /prominent Deerfield Texaco Station – Deerfield, Kearny County (c. 1917) chimneys Architectural Styles Tudor Revival (1890-1940) Shoemaker House – Topeka, Shawnee County (c. 1925) Powell House – Wichita, Sedgwick County (c. 1920s) Architectural Styles Beaux Arts / French Eclectic (1885-1930) •Wall Surfaces with decorative garlands, floral patterns and shields •Façade with quoins, pilasters and columns •Masonry Walls •Symmetry •Roof: Flat or low- AXA Building – Leavenworth, Leavenworth County (c. 1905) pitched Architectural Styles Beaux Arts / French Eclectic AXA Building – Leavenworth, Leavenworth County (c. 1905) Architectural Styles Prairie Style (1900-1920) • Low-pitched roof, usually hipped • Wide overhanging eaves • Two-stories with one-story wings and porches; • Emphasis on horizontal lines • Indigenous American Style – Developed in Chicago – Frank Lloyd Wright Allen House – Wichita, Sedgwick County (c. 1919) Architectural Styles Prairie Style (1900-1920) 1113 Antelope – Scott City, Scott County (c. 1967) Hatcher Hospital – Wellington, Sumner County (c. 1916) Architectural Styles • House form Foursquare • Wide overhanging eaves • Detailing can take on any number of popular early 20th century styles including Craftsman, Classical Revival, Colonial Revival Architectural Styles Craftsman (1905-1940) • Low-pitched, gabled roof (occasionally hipped) • Wide unenclosed eave overhang • Roof Rafters usually exposed – Decorative Rafter Tails • Columns / pedestals supporting front porch • Bungalow form Loomis-Parry House – Augusta, Butler County (c. 1917) • Originated in Southern California Architectural Styles Craftsman (1905-1940) Residence – Topeka, Shawnee County Architectural Styles Art Moderne (1920-1940) • Smooth wall surface, usually stucco • Flat roof • Horizontal Emphasis – Balustrades, grooves and lines in walls • Typically asymmetrical • Art Deco includes more zig-zags & geometric patterns Architectural Styles Art Moderne (1920-1940) Ramsay House – Atchison, Atchison County (1948) Ablah House – Wichita, Sedgwick County (1939) Architectural Styles International Style (1930-present) • Flat Roof • Windows set flush with the outer wall – Metal casements • Smooth, unornamented wall surfaces with no decorative detailing at doors or windows • Often asymmetrical 201 Elm Street – Cottonwood Falls, Chase County (c. 1950) Architectural Styles Minimal Traditional (1940-1955) • Post WWII - shift away from historical styles • Loosely based on Tudor forms • Little ornamentation Architectural Styles Ranch Style (1950-1975) • Shift towards automobile culture • Sprawling Size • Loosely based on early Spanish Colonial, borrowed some Craftsman and Prairie elements • Asymmetrical • One Story • Moderate or wide eaves • Wood or Brick cladding Woodburn House – Wichita, Sedgwick County (c. 1955) Architectural Styles Split-Level (1960-1980) • Multi-story modification of the Ranch style • Horizontal lines • One wing has a second story McLean House – Wichita, Sedgwick County (c. 1955) Architectural Styles Mid-century Modern • New materials and forms Double Hyperbolic Paraboloid House – Lawrence, Douglas County (c. 1955) Architectural Styles Mid-century Modern Ecumenical Christian Ministries – Lawrence, Douglas County (c. 1959) Architectural Styles Mid-century Modern 809 Main Street – Hays, Ellis County Architectural Styles Mid-century Modern Architectural Styles Mid-century Modern Gold Dome Bank – Oklahoma City, OK Oral Roberts University – Tulsa, OK Why Preserve? “…In old buildings we glimpse the world of previous generations” ~ Author Steward Brand, How Buildings Learn .
Recommended publications
  • RACE, SPACE, and PLACE: the RELATION BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL MODERNISM, POST-MODERNISM, URBAN PLANNING, and GENTRIFICATION Keith A
    RACE, SPACE, AND PLACE: THE RELATION BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL MODERNISM, POST-MODERNISM, URBAN PLANNING, AND GENTRIFICATION Keith Aoki * [Cite as: 20 Fordham Urb. L.J. 699 (1993)] Introduction Gentrification in United States urban housing markets of the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s continues to be a controversial and complex phenomenon. [FN1] During the past twenty years, gentrification's effects on the core cities of the U.S. have been analyzed and evaluated many times over. [FN2] Descriptions of gentrification have spanned the ideological *700 spectrum, from laudatory embraces of gentrification as the solution to urban decline to denunciatory critiques of gentrification as another symptom of the widening gulf between the haves and the have- nots in America. [FN3] This Article critiques gentrification, adding an additional explanatory element to the ongoing account of the dynamics of American cities in the 1990s. The additional element is the relevance of a major aesthetic realignment in architecture and urban planning from a modernist to a post-modernist ideology in the 1970s and 1980s. This shift involved an aesthetic and economic revaluation of historical elements in older central city buildings, which accelerated the rate of gentrification, displacement, and abandonment. This Article describes how certain shifts in the aesthetic ideology [FN4] of urban planners and architects affected suburban and urban spatial distribution in the United States during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. These ideological shifts arose from deeply embedded American attitudes toward city and rural life that had emerged in American town planning and architectural theory and practice by the mid-nineteenth century. Part I of this Article examines the emergence of an anti-urban Arcadian strand in nineteenth century American town planning rhetoric.
    [Show full text]
  • AUSTRALIAN ROMANESQUE a History of Romanesque-Inspired Architecture in Australia by John W. East 2016
    AUSTRALIAN ROMANESQUE A History of Romanesque-Inspired Architecture in Australia by John W. East 2016 CONTENTS 1. Introduction . 1 2. The Romanesque Style . 4 3. Australian Romanesque: An Overview . 25 4. New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory . 52 5. Victoria . 92 6. Queensland . 122 7. Western Australia . 138 8. South Australia . 156 9. Tasmania . 170 Chapter 1: Introduction In Australia there are four Catholic cathedrals designed in the Romanesque style (Canberra, Newcastle, Port Pirie and Geraldton) and one Anglican cathedral (Parramatta). These buildings are significant in their local communities, but the numbers of people who visit them each year are minuscule when compared with the numbers visiting Australia's most famous Romanesque building, the large Sydney retail complex known as the Queen Victoria Building. God and Mammon, and the Romanesque serves them both. Do those who come to pray in the cathedrals, and those who come to shop in the galleries of the QVB, take much notice of the architecture? Probably not, and yet the Romanesque is a style of considerable character, with a history stretching back to Antiquity. It was never extensively used in Australia, but there are nonetheless hundreds of buildings in the Romanesque style still standing in Australia's towns and cities. Perhaps it is time to start looking more closely at these buildings? They will not disappoint. The heyday of the Australian Romanesque occurred in the fifty years between 1890 and 1940, and it was largely a brick-based style. As it happens, those years also marked the zenith of craft brickwork in Australia, because it was only in the late nineteenth century that Australia began to produce high-quality, durable bricks in a wide range of colours.
    [Show full text]
  • Mid-Twentieth Century Architecture in Alaska Historic Context (1945-1968)
    Mid-Twentieth Century Architecture in Alaska Historic Context (1945-1968) Prepared by Amy Ramirez . Jeanne Lambin . Robert L. Meinhardt . and Casey Woster 2016 The Cultural Resource Programs of the National Park Service have responsibilities that include stewardship of historic buildings, museum collections, archeological sites, cultural landscapes, oral and written histories, and ethnographic resources. The material is based upon work assisted by funding from the National Park Service. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of the Interior. Printed 2018 Cover: Atwood Center, Alaska Pacific University, Anchorage, 2017, NPS photograph MID-TWENTIETH CENTURY ARCHITECTURE IN ALASKA HISTORIC CONTEXT (1945 – 1968) Prepared for National Park Service, Alaska Regional Office Prepared by Amy Ramirez, B.A. Jeanne Lambin, M.S. Robert L. Meinhardt, M.A. and Casey Woster, M.A. July 2016 Table of Contents LIST OF ACRONYMS/ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................... 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 8 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Historic Context as a Planning & Evaluation Tool ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Architectural Resourcesresources
    CHAPTER2 ARCHITECTURALARCHITECTURAL RESOURCESRESOURCES Key features of historic resources should be preserved. This chapter presents a historic overview and identifies the key features of architectural styles found in San Jose: • Vernacular or National p. 17 • Italianate and Italianate Cottage p. 18 • Greek Revival p. 19 • Carpenter Gothic or Folk Victorian p. 19 • Queen Anne p. 20 • Stick p. 21 • Shingle p. 22 • Neoclassical p. 23 • Colonial Revival p. 24 • Dutch Colonial Revival p. 24 • Craftsman p. 25 • Bungalow p. 26 • Prairie p. 27 • Tudor Revival p. 28 • Mission Revival p. 28 • Spanish Eclectic or Spanish Colonial Revival or Mediterranean Revival p. 29 • Italian Renaissance p. 30 • Art Deco p. 30 • Art Moderne p. 31 • International p. 31 • Mid-Century Modern p. 32 Guide for Preserving San Jose Homes Chapter 2: Architectural Resources CHAPTER 2 ARCHITECTURALARCHITECTURAL RESOURCESRESOURCES Individual building features are important to the character of San Jose. The mass and scale, form, materials and architectural details of the buildings are the elements that distinguish one architectural style from another, or even older neighborhoods from newer developments. This chapter presents an overview of those important elements of the built environment which make up San Jose. This includes a brief history of development, as well as a summary of the different types and styles of architecture found in its neighborhoods. Brief History Vendome neighborhood, just to the northwest of the The settlement of the Santa Clara Valley by Euro- present-day Hensley Historic District. This original site Americans began in 1769 with an initial exploration was subjected to severe winter flooding during the first of the valley by Spanish explorers.
    [Show full text]
  • Teori Arsitektur 03
    •Victorian architecture 1837 and 1901 UK •Neolithic architecture 10,000 BC-3000 BC •Jacobethan 1838 •Sumerian architecture 5300 BC-2000 BC •Carpenter Gothic USA and Canada 1840s on •Soft Portuguese style 1940-1955 Portugal & colonies •Ancient Egyptian architecture 3000 BC-373 AD •Queenslander (architecture) 1840s–1960s •Ranch-style 1940s-1970s USA •Classical architecture 600 BC-323 AD Australian architectural styles •New towns 1946-1968 United Kingdom Ancient Greek architecture 776 BC-265 BC •Romanesque Revival architecture 1840–1900 USA •Mid-century modern 1950s California, etc. Roman architecture 753 BC–663 AD •Neo-Manueline 1840s-1910s Portugal & Brazil •Florida Modern 1950s or Tropical Modern •Architecture of Armenia (IVe s - XVIe s) •Neo-Grec 1848 and 1865 •Googie architecture 1950s USA •Merovingian architecture 400s-700s France and Germany •Adirondack Architecture 1850s New York, USA •Brutalist architecture 1950s–1970s •Anglo-Saxon architecture 450s-1066 England and Wales •Bristol Byzantine 1850-1880 •Structuralism 1950s-1970s •Byzantine architecture 527 (Sofia)-1520 •Second Empire 1865 and 1880 •Metabolist Movement 1959 Japan •Islamic Architecture 691-present •Queen Anne Style architecture 1870–1910s England & USA •Arcology 1970s-present •Carolingian architecture 780s-800s France and Germany Stick Style 1879-1905 New England •Repoblación architecture 880s-1000s Spain •Structural Expressionism 1980s-present Eastlake Style 1879-1905 New England •Ottonian architecture 950s-1050s Germany Shingle Style 1879-1905 New England •Postmodern architecture 1980s •Russian architecture 989-1700s •National Park Service Rustic 1872–present USA •Romanesque architecture 1050-1100 •Deconstructivism 1982–present •Chicago school (architecture) 1880s and 1890 USA •Norman architecture 1074-1250 •Memphis Group 1981-1988 •Neo-Byzantine architecture 1882–1920s American •Blobitecture 2003–present •Gothic architecture •Art Nouveau/Jugendstil c.
    [Show full text]
  • Ndcrs Site Form Training Manual: Architectural Sites
    NDCRS SITE FORM TRAINING MANUAL: ARCHITECTURAL SITES By J. Signe Snortland, L. Martin Perry, Lauren McCroskey, Fern E. Swenson, Amy C. Bleier, Lorna B. Meidinger Division of Archeology & Historic Preservation State Historical Society of North Dakota North Dakota Heritage Center & State Museum Bismarck, North Dakota https://www.history.nd.gov/hp/index.html 2020 Entire contents copyrighted 2020 State Historical Society of North Dakota All rights reserved Produced by the Division of Archeology and Historic Preservation, State Historical Society of North Dakota Cover photo: Former Governor’s Mansion State Historic Site (32BL17), Burleigh County. Victorian Stick Style, constructed in 1884. Location: 320 E. Ave B, Bismarck, North Dakota. NDCRS Architectural Site Form Manual—2020 Page 2 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 6 NDCRS AND GIS ...................................................................................................................... 6 CULTURAL HERITAGE FORM .............................................................................................. 7 HOW TO COMPLETE A NDCRS SITE FORM....................................................................... 7 Defined Non-Sites and Property Types Requiring No Formal Documentation ..................... 8 General Rules for Completion of NDCRS Site Forms ........................................................... 9 PDF Site Forms ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Discover Historic Wichita! Booklet
    KEY: WICHITA REGISTER OF WRHP - HISTORIC PLACES REGISTER OF HISTORIC RHKP - KANSAS PLACES NATIONAL REGISTER OF NRHP - HISTORIC PLACES For more information contact: Historic Preservation Office Metropolitan Area Planning Department 10th Floor-City Hall 455 N. Main Wichita, Kansas 67202 (316) 268-4421 www.wichita.gov ind out more about Wichita’s history on the Discover Historic Wichita! guided F trolley tour. 316-352-4809 INTRODUCTION Discover Historic Wichita was first published in 1997. A second edition was printed in 2002 with a few minor changes. Since that printing, Wichita property owners have expressed a growing interest in listing their properties in the Register of Historic Kansas Places (RHKP) and the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) and many have been added. Also, a commercial area, the Warehouse and Jobbers District, was listed in 2003 and Wichita’s four historic districts were listed in the RHKP and NRHP in 2004. In this latest edition additional research was conduct- ed to ensure accuracy. The brochure is organized alphabetically by the name of the structure. The entries are also numbered to correspond with locations on the map found at the front of the brochure. An online publication of the Discover Historic Wichita brochure is updated as properties and/or his- toric districts are added to Wichita’s inventory of list- ed properties. The current version is on the Historic Preservation Office website at http://www.wichita. gov/Residents/History/. Biographical notes of relevant architects have been added to this brochure. Wichita’s periods of economic boom and bust brought these professionals to town to take advantage of building surges.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Architectural Treasures
    TOUR Laramie & Albany County, Wyoming Historic architectural treasures of the gem city of the plains TOUR Laramie & Albany County, Wyoming Welcome! Once upon a time, kings and queens embarked upon royal These turbulent early years of the Gem City of the Plains (a tours to visit the distant corners of their realm. Today we invite nickname bestowed in the early 1870s by the publisher of a you to walk no more than a few short blocks to meet Laramie’s local newspaper) left a colorful legacy that continues to attract special brand of “royalty” – magnificent Victorian, Queen visitors to Laramie’s historic downtown, its museums, and those Anne, and Tudor homes, the crown jewels of our town’s rich same Victorian homes, many of which are now listed in the architectural heritage. Each of our three tours combines a National Register of Historic Places. variety of these and other architectural styles but has a unique flavor all its own. We hope you have fun while walking on these tours that take you to some of our most architecturally historic homes. Some From its beginning, Laramie was a railroad town, and, like are prominently located on busy streets where passing traffic other “Hell-on-Wheels” towns, its early history was violent and rarely slows to admire their splendor; others are wonderful spectacular. Named for a French trapper, Jacques LaRamie, it old gems on quiet neighborhood streets, their outstanding was also one of the few end-of-the-tracks encampments along architectural elements sometimes obscured by century-old trees. the route that survived.
    [Show full text]
  • Melissa Mayhew History 586-B, Undergraduate Research Seminar on the Middle Ages Spring 2015 Instructor: Prof
    1 Melissa Mayhew History 586-B, Undergraduate Research Seminar on the Middle Ages Spring 2015 Instructor: Prof. David Defries Castles of K-State Abstract: One of the most notable things about the Kansas State University campus is its abundance of castles. This paper argues that these castles were designed to match earlier buildings that were a part of medieval revival styles in architecture, particularly the Romanesque. What the medieval meant to the adopters of the Romanesque was different from the ideas of Englishness and aristocracy of the Gothic revival, yet they shared the use of medieval architecture as a statement against the standardization and cold logic of the Industrial Revolution. While the meaning and significance of the K-State castles has changed over the century or so they have existed, the differing values of what the medieval and modern symbolize still appear when new castles are built and the old ones restored. One of the most striking features of Kansas State University’s campus is the number of ‘castles’ it contains. Although these buildings are not technically castles, their towers, castellated parapets, and turrets, such as those seen on Nichols Hall and Holton Hall, stir most people to identify them with the large stone fortresses built in the Middle Ages. Most of the buildings on K-State’s campus are over a century old and while various reference books, histories, newspapers, and guides available in K-State’s Special Collections Archives helpfully say what styles the buildings are and point out that those styles were popular at the time the buildings were built, the sources do not discuss the significance of the buildings’ architectural styles.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Texas Jailhouses: Romanesque Revival, Identity, and Reform
    Historic Texas Jailhouses: Romanesque Revival, Identity, and Reform Shawna Prather “A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Folklore.” Chapel Hill 2011 Approved by Bernard L. Herman Katherine R. Roberts Timothy W. Marr © 2011 Shawna Prather ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT SHAWNA PRATHER: Historic Texas Jailhouses: Romanesque Revival, Identity, and Reform (Under the Direction of Bernard L. Herman) Even though jailhouses dominate the skyline of many small Texas towns, not much work has been done on what those buildings mean in the historic context in which they were built. These jailhouses held specific meanings for small Texas communities and their townspeople that also helped to shape present day society. Texas jailhouse architecture between 1880 and 1910 reflected the desire to be modern, the desire for changes in prison reform, and the position of women and family in a newly civilized society. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures……………………………………………………………………………………………..…v A Portrait of Late 19th Century Texas………………………………………………………………3 Texas and Law Enforcement…………………………………………………………………………..8 First Jails……………………………………………………………………………………………………...12 Romanesque Architecture: A Brief History…………………………………………………….16 Romanesque as Civic Identity………………………………………………………………………..18 Romanesque Revival Values and Prison Reform…………………………………………….30 Women, Moral Responsibility, and Social Reform…………………………………………..36 Texas Romanesque Revival Jails Today………………………………………………………….42 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………………………………56 iv List of Figures 1. McCulloch County Courthouse, Brady, Texas…………………………………………..45 2. McCulloch County Jail, Brady, Texas……………………………………………………….46 3. Drunk Tank…………………………………………………………………………………………...47 4. Solitary Confinement……………………………………………………………………………..48 5. San Saba County Jail………………………………………………………………………………48 6. Coryell County Jail…………………………………………………………………………………49 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Preservation Study and Evaluation
    Golden HHI Planned District Historic Preservation Study and Evaluation Prepared for the City of San Diego Planning Department and Historical Site Board by CIANI AND SOMERVILLE DESIGN ASSOCIATES Architectural and Historic Preservation Consultants La Jolla, California April, 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUMEl 1. Introduction 1 2. Methodology 2 3. Historical Background 15 4. Evaluation 24 5. Recommendations and Conclusions 31 6. List of Maps 35 1. Bibliography and References 36 8. Acknowledgements 40 it CONTENTS OF VOLUME II HISTORIC RESOURCE INVENTORY Russ Blvd. B Street Broadway A Street C Street CONTENTS OF VOLUME III HISTORIC RESOURCE INVENTORY E Street Avenido Cerro Gordo 20th Street F Street Treat Street 21st Street Glendale Ave. 19th Street CONTENTS OF VOLUME IV HISTORIC RESOURCE INVENTORY 22nd Street 25th Street 28th Street 23rd Street 26th Street 24th Street 27th Street iii Vicinity k c.., .,K 'l: \[\ C; 'N '" ~ ~ '"II) corcmado GOLDEN HILL PLANNED DISTRICT jv 1 Introduction TIlerefore, our review of the cultural context is a summary of work by others, and is provided TIlis survey has been conducted for the City of San as an overview of the social history of the Diego Planning Department and the community of greater Golden Hill area. Golden Hill, with special consideration for the perceived goal of producing a canprehensive evalua­ TIlis study of the Planned District provides tion and documentation of all cultural resources an assessment of the architectural styles and located within the Golden Hill Planned District. periods of the survey area, and an evaluation TIle canpletion of this survey brings the community of significance arrong the surveyed sites, objects, a step closer to irrplerrenting the goals of the and structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Late 19Th and Early 20Th Century Residential Architecture, 1885-1910
    LOS ANGELES CITYWIDE HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT Context: Architecture and Engineering, 1850-1980 Theme: Late 19th and Early 20th Century Residential Architecture, 1885-1910 Theme: Housing the Masses, 1880-1975 th th Sub-Theme: Late 19 and Early 20 Century Neighborhoods, 1880-1910 Prepared for: City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning Office of Historic Resources July 2019 SurveyLA Citywide Historic Context Statement Architecture and Engineering/Late 19th and Early 20th Century Residential Architecture Housing the Masses/Late 19th and Early 20th Century Neighborhoods TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE ................................................................................................................................ 1 CONTRIBUTORS ..................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 1 HISTORIC CONTEXT THEME: LATE 19TH AND EARLY 20TH CENTURY RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURE, 1885-1910 ....... 2 SUB-THEME: EASTLAKE, 1885-1905 ................................................................................ 11 SUB-THEME: QUEEN ANNE, 1885-1905 ........................................................................... 16 SUB-THEME: SHINGLE STYLE, 1885-1910 ......................................................................... 22 SUB-THEME: FOLK VICTORIAN, 1871-1905 ...................................................................... 26 SUB-THEME:
    [Show full text]