DOCSLIB.ORG

SUOMEN VIIDES MÄÄRÄAIKAISRAPORTTI ALUEELLISIA KIELIÄ TAI VÄHEMMISTÖKIELIÄ KOSKEVAN EUROOPPALAISEN PERUSKIRJAN TÄYTÄNTÖÖNPANOSTA - Saamelaiskäräjien Huomiot

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SUOMEN VIIDES MÄÄRÄAIKAISRAPORTTI ALUEELLISIA KIELIÄ TAI VÄHEMMISTÖKIELIÄ KOSKEVAN EUROOPPALAISEN PERUSKIRJAN TÄYTÄNTÖÖNPANOSTA - Saamelaiskäräjien Huomiot SUOMEN VIIDES MÄÄRÄAIKAISRAPORTTI ALUEELLISIA KIELIÄ TAI VÄHEMMISTÖKIELIÄ KOSKEVAN EUROOPPALAISEN PERUSKIRJAN TÄYTÄNTÖÖNPANOSTA - Saamelaiskäräjien huomiot HEINÄKUU 2017 Saamelaiskäräjien huomiot SISÄLLYSLUETTELO JOHDANTO ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 OSA I .................................................................................................................................................................... 8 1. PERUSTIEDOT SUOMEN VÄESTÖSTÄ JA KIELISTÄ ................................................................................................ 8 1.1. Suomen väestö äidinkielen mukaan ............................................................................................................ 8 1.2. Väestökirjahallinto ....................................................................................................................................... 9 2. AHVENANMAAN ERITYISASEMA ........................................................................................................................ 10 3. ALUEELLISIA KIELIÄ TAI VÄHEMMISTÖKIELIÄ KÄYTTÄVIEN LUKUMÄÄRÄT SUOMESSA ..................................... 11 3.1. Ruotsin kieli ................................................................................................................................................ 11 3.2. Saamen kielet ............................................................................................................................................. 11 3.3. Alueellisen kielen tai vähemmistökielen puhujan määritelmästä.............................................................. 12 4. EI-ALUEELLISET KIELET JA NIITÄ KÄYTTÄVIEN LUKUMÄÄRÄT SUOMESSA .......................................................... 13 4.1. Romanikieli ................................................................................................................................................ 13 4.2. Venäjän kieli ............................................................................................................................................... 13 4.3. Tataari ........................................................................................................................................................ 14 4.4. Jiddiš........................................................................................................................................................... 14 4.5. Karjalan kieli .............................................................................................................................................. 15 4.6. Viron kieli ................................................................................................................................................... 15 4.7. Viittomakieli ............................................................................................................................................... 16 5. HALLITUSOHJELMA, STRATEGIAT, SELONTEOT, KERTOMUKSET JA SELVITYKSET .............................................. 18 5.1. Hallitusohjelma .......................................................................................................................................... 18 5.2. Osaamisen ja koulutuksen kärkihanke ....................................................................................................... 18 5.3. Kansallinen perus- ja ihmisoikeustoimintaohjelma 2017–2019................................................................. 18 5.4. Kansalliskielistrategia ja sen seuranta ....................................................................................................... 19 5.5. Kansalliskielistrategian toimintasuunnitelma ............................................................................................ 21 5.6. Kertomus kielilainsäädännön soveltamisesta ............................................................................................ 21 5.7. Kielibarometri 2016 ................................................................................................................................... 22 5.8. Saamebarometri 2016 ............................................................................................................................... 23 5.9. Selvitys romanien perustuslaissa turvattujen kielellisten oikeuksien toteutumisesta ............................... 23 6. KANSALLINEN LAINSÄÄDÄNTÖ .......................................................................................................................... 24 6.1. Kielilain muutokset ..................................................................................................................................... 24 6.2. Saamen kielilain uudistus ........................................................................................................................... 25 6.3. Uusi yhdenvertaisuuslaki ........................................................................................................................... 26 6.4. Perusopetuslain muutos esiopetuksesta .................................................................................................... 26 7. KIELELLISTEN PERUSOIKEUKSIEN TOTEUTUMISEN VALVONTA .......................................................................... 26 7.1. Ennakollinen ja jälkikäteinen valvonta ...................................................................................................... 26 7.2. Valtioneuvoston oikeuskansleri ................................................................................................................. 27 7.3. Eduskunnan oikeusasiamies....................................................................................................................... 27 7.4. Yhdenvertaisuusvaltuutettu ja tasa-arvo- ja yhdenvertaisuuslautakunta ................................................. 27 8. KIELELLISIÄ OIKEUKSIA EDISTÄVIÄ RAKENTEITA ................................................................................................ 28 8.1. Kieliasiain neuvottelukunta ........................................................................................................................ 28 8.2. Saamen kielineuvosto ................................................................................................................................ 28 8.3. Kansalliskieliverkosto ................................................................................................................................. 29 8.4. Kaksikielisten kuntien kansalliskieliverkosto .............................................................................................. 29 8.5. Kielikoulutuspolitiikan verkosto ................................................................................................................. 29 8.6. Kotimaisten kielten keskus ......................................................................................................................... 30 8.7. Kansallinen ihmisoikeusinstituutio ............................................................................................................. 30 8.8. Valtioneuvoston perus- ja ihmisoikeusyhteyshenkilöiden verkosto ........................................................... 31 9. MINISTERIKOMITEAN SUOSITUSTEN TÄYTÄNTÖÖNPANOSTA .......................................................................... 31 9.1. Suosituksista tiedottaminen ...................................................................................................................... 31 9.2. Suositus – politiikka ja rahoitus saamenkielisen koulutuksen kehittämiseksi............................................ 32 9.3. Suositus - inarin- ja koltansaamen suojelu kielipesätoiminnan avulla ....................................................... 34 9.4. Suositus - ruotsin- ja saamenkieliset sosiaali- ja terveydenhuoltopalvelut ................................................ 34 Kielellisten oikeuksien toteutumisesta palveluissa ........................................................................................................ 34 Kielelliset oikeudet julkisen sosiaali- ja terveydenhuollon palvelurakenteen uudistuksessa ......................................... 36 Lapsi- ja perhepalvelujen muutosohjelma (LAPE) .......................................................................................................... 38 2 Saamelaiskäräjien huomiot 9.5. Suositus - romanikielen opetus .................................................................................................................. 38 9.6. Suositus - tietoisuus alueellisista ja vähemmistökielistä ............................................................................ 39 Oikeusministeriö kielellisten oikeuksien edistäjänä ....................................................................................................... 39 Ihmisoikeudet opetussuunnitelmissa ............................................................................................................................ 39 Yleisradion tehtävistä ..................................................................................................................................................... 39 Sanomalehdistön tuki .................................................................................................................................................... 40 Mediavaikuttamisen koulutusohjelma vähemmistönuorille.........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Connections Between Sámi and Basque Peoples
    Connections between Sámi and Basque Peoples Kent Randell 2012 Siidastallan Outside of Minneapolis, Minneapolis Kent Randell (c) 2012 --- 2012 Siidastallan, Linwood Township, Minnesota Kent Randell (c) 2012 --- 2012 Siidastallan, Linwood Township, Minnesota “D----- it Jim, I’m a librarian and an armchair anthropologist??” Kent Randell (c) 2012 --- 2012 Siidastallan, Linwood Township, Minnesota Connections between Sámi and Basque Peoples Hard evidence: - mtDNA - Uniqueness of language Other things may be surprising…. or not. It is fun to imagine other connections, understanding it is not scientific Kent Randell (c) 2012 --- 2012 Siidastallan, Linwood Township, Minnesota Documentary: Suddenly Sámi by Norway’s Ellen-Astri Lundby She receives her mtDNA test, and express surprise when her results state that she is connected to Spain. This also surprised me, and spurned my interest….. Then I ended up living in Boise, Idaho, the city with the largest concentration of Basque outside of Basque Country Kent Randell (c) 2012 --- 2012 Siidastallan, Linwood Township, Minnesota What is mtDNA genealogy? The DNA of the Mitochondria in your cells. Cell energy, cell growth, cell signaling, etc. mtDNA – At Conception • The Egg cell Mitochondria’s DNA remains the same after conception. • Male does not contribute to the mtDNA • Therefore Mitochondrial mtDNA is the same as one’s mother. Kent Randell (c) 2012 --- 2012 Siidastallan, Linwood Township, Minnesota Kent Randell (c) 2012 --- 2012 Siidastallan, Linwood Township, Minnesota Kent Randell (c) 2012 --- 2012 Siidastallan, Linwood Township, Minnesota Four generation mtDNA line Sisters – Mother – Maternal Grandmother – Great-grandmother Jennie Mary Karjalainen b. Kent21 Randell March (c) 2012 1886, --- 2012 Siidastallan,parents from Kuusamo, Finland Linwood Township, Minnesota Isaac Abramson and Jennie Karjalainen wedding picture Isaac is from Northern Norway, Kvaen father and Saami mother from Haetta Kent Randell (c) 2012 --- 2012 Siidastallan, village.
    [Show full text]
  • Adult Education and Indigenous Peoples in Norway. International Survey on Adult Education for Indigenous Peoples
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 458 367 CE 082 168 AUTHOR Lund, Svein TITLE Adult Education and Indigenous Peoples in Norway. International Survey on Adult Education for Indigenous Peoples. Country Study: Norway. INSTITUTION Nordic Sami Inst., Guovdageaidnu, Norway.; United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, Hamburg (Germany). Inst. for Education. PUB DATE 2000-00-00 NOTE 103p.; For other country studies, see CE 082 166-170. Research supported by the Government of Norway and DANIDA. AVAILABLE FROM For full text: http://www.unesco.org/education/uie/pdf/Norway.pdf. PUB TYPE Reports Research (143) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC05 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Access to Education; Acculturation; *Adult Education; Adult Learning; Adult Students; Colleges; Computers; Cultural Differences; Culturally Relevant Education; Delivery Systems; Dropouts; Educational Administration; Educational Attainment; *Educational Environment; Educational History; Educational Needs; Educational Opportunities; Educational Planning; *Educational Policy; *Educational Trends; Equal Education; Foreign Countries; Government School Relationship; Inclusive Schools; *Indigenous Populations; Language Minorities; Language of Instruction; Needs Assessment; Postsecondary Education; Professional Associations; Program Administration; Public Policy; Rural Areas; Secondary Education; Self Determination; Social Integration; Social Isolation; State of the Art Reviews; Student Characteristics; Trend Analysis; Universities; Vocational Education; Womens Education IDENTIFIERS Finland; Folk
    [Show full text]
  • On Transfer of Sámi Traditional Knowledge: Scientification, Traditionalization, Secrecy, and Equality*
    On Transfer of Sámi Traditional Knowledge: Scientification, Traditionalization, Secrecy, and Equality* Elina Helander-Renvall and Inkeri Markkula Introduction The aim of this chapter is to elaborate how Sámi traditional knowledge is ar- ticulated and transferred, especially as part of research activities. As a starting point, we will discuss traditional knowledge and its various understandings. Further on, we will trace and address some of the concerns that Sámi have in relation to how their reality is researched and described. Special attention will be paid to the secrecy surrounding some Sámi traditions and some knowl- edge in the context of conducting research on such issues; the scientifijication of Sámi knowledge; the traditionalization (actualization) of various traditions; and the need for equality between scientifijic and traditional knowledge. Traditional knowledge ( TK) has many defijinitions. Traditional knowledge may be defijined as knowledge that has a long historical and cultural continu- ity, having been passed down through generations, as Berkes has noted.1 In the book on traditional knowledge by Porsanger and Guttorm2 the concept árbediehtu (inherited knowledge, a Northern Sámi word) is used to refer to Sámi knowledge. They state that árbediehtu is ‘the collective wisdom and skills of the Sámi people used to enhance their livelihood for centuries. It has been * We would like to thank Regional Council of Lapland, European Regional Development Fund, and University of Lapland for the fijinancial support for the project Traditional Eco- logical Knowledge in the Sami Homeland Region of Finland which was conducted at the Arctic Centre, Rovaniemi during 1.1.2014-30.4.2015. The general aim of this project was to promote the status of Sami traditional ecological knowledge through support to the Sami craftswomen.
    [Show full text]
  • Études Finno-Ougriennes, 46 | 2014 Introduction À L’Histoire Des Sames Du Sud 2
    Études finno-ougriennes 46 | 2014 Littératures & varia Introduction à l’histoire des Sames du sud Introduction to South Saamis’ history Inledning till sydsamernas historia Guillaume Lestringant Édition électronique URL : https://journals.openedition.org/efo/3794 DOI : 10.4000/efo.3794 ISSN : 2275-1947 Éditeur INALCO Édition imprimée Date de publication : 1 janvier 2014 ISBN : 978-2-343-05394-3 ISSN : 0071-2051 Référence électronique Guillaume Lestringant, « Introduction à l’histoire des Sames du sud », Études finno-ougriennes [En ligne], 46 | 2014, mis en ligne le 13 octobre 2015, consulté le 08 juillet 2021. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/efo/3794 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/efo.3794 Ce document a été généré automatiquement le 8 juillet 2021. Études finno-ougriennes est mis à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International. Introduction à l’histoire des Sames du sud 1 Introduction à l’histoire des Sames du sud Introduction to South Saamis’ history Inledning till sydsamernas historia Guillaume Lestringant Introduction 1 Avant de se lancer1 dans une histoire des Sames du Sud, il faut prendre le temps de déterminer de qui on parle. Donner une définition précise aux Sames du Sud est évidemment une tâche ardue, aussi ne me risquerai-je pas à décider ce qui caractérise l’appartenance au peuple same du Sud et ce qui n’est pas pertinent. Le Conseil Same, sorte de fédération de toutes les associations sames créée en 1956, a donné en 1986 sa propre définition des Sames : We, Saami, are one people, united in our own culture, language and history, living in areas which, since time immemorial and up to historical times, we alone inhabited and utilised.
    [Show full text]
  • The Southern Sami Drum (Gievrie)- Discovery, Recovery and Recontextualising
    The Southern Sami Drum (Gievrie)- discovery, recovery and recontextualising Martin Callanan∗1 1Dept of Historical Studies, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology { Dept of Historical Studies, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway., Norv`ege R´esum´e Sami frame drums, consisting of a wooden frame covered by a decorated membrane are the most common type of ceremonial drum from the Southern Sami region in central Scandi- navia. Well-preserved examples have complex decorations and offerings in the form of cords, rings and metal ornaments. Pointers and hammers were used together with the drums during certain ceremonies. Gievrie is Southern Sami language term for these drums. Around 44 examples of the Southern Sami Gievrie exist today. They allow us valuable glimpses into the materiality of past ceremonies and ritual life. They also have enormous symbolic power. Not least in relation to historical and political negotiations in the recent past, when Southern Sami minorities were subject to christianization and nationalization processes by Church and State. During certain periods, Church officials confiscated Sami drum they were seen as pagan objects. Sometimes, the drums' owners hid their Gievrie in the mountains rather than hand them over to State authorities. In recent years, a number of Gievrie that remained hidden in the mountains have been dis- covered and brought into regional museums. Furthermore, in 2017 a famous well-preserved Gievrie from Freavnantjahke that today belongs to a German museum, was loaned out temporarily to form the centerpiece of a museum exhibition during the Tr˚aante2017 Sami centenary celebrations in Trondheim.
    [Show full text]
  • Pathways to the International Market for Indigenous Screen Content: Success Stories, Lessons Learned from Selected Jurisdic- Tions and a Strategy for Growth
    Pathways to the International Market for Indigenous Screen Content: Success Stories, Lessons Learned From Selected Jurisdic- tions and a Strategy For Growth PREPARED FOR SUBMITTED BY imagineNATIVE Maria De Rosa 401 Richmond St. West, Suite 446 Marilyn Burgess Toronto, Ontario M5V 3A8 Communications MDR 503 Victoria Avenue Westmount, Québec H3Y 2R3 www.communicationsmdr.com December 5, 2018 1 Pathways to the International Market for Indigenous Screen Content Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... 2 FOREWORD ................................................................................................................... 3 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 4 I. THE NEW CONTEXT: A RISING TIDE OF INDIGENOUS PRODUCTION ................. 6 II. SUCCESS STORIES: CASE STUDIES OF CANADIAN AND INTERNATIONAL FILMS, TELEVISION PROGRAMS AND DIGITAL MEDIA .......................................... 14 III. LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE SUCCESS OF INTERNATIONAL INDIGENOUS SCREEN CONTENT ..................................................................................................... 43 IV. PATHWAYS TO THE INTERNATIONAL MARKET FOR CONSIDERATION BY THE INDIGENOUS SCREEN SECTOR IN CANADA ................................................... 57 ANNEX 1: SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY ..................................................................... 71 ANNEX 2: SUMMARY OF RESULTS OF ON-LINE QUESTIONNAIRE
    [Show full text]
  • DOMINANT ETHNIC GROUPS in EUROPE, 1850-1940 · Ethnic Groups and Language Rights Volume III
    COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON GOVERNMENTS AND NON­ 1/ .f:( - DOMINANT ETHNIC GROUPS IN EUROPE, 1850-1940 · Ethnic Groups and Language Rights Volume III ~., i . 1 . Edited by { SERGIJ VILFAN in collaboration with 1 GUDMUND SANDVIK and LODE WILS 1. f' 1 ~... ,' Non-existent Sami Language Rights in Norway, 1850--1940 GUDMUND SANDVIK European Science Foundation NEW YORK UNIVERSITY PRESS DARTMOUTH 128 .., 13 Non-existent Sami Language Rights in Norway, 1850-1940 GUDMUND SANDVIK Background The Samis are an ethnic minority in the Nordic countries and in Russia. According to more or less reliable censuses, they number today about 40 000 in Norway (1 per cent of the total population), 20000 in Sweden (0.25 per cent), 4500 in Finland (0.1 per cent) and 2000 on the Kola peninsula in Russia. Only Finland has had a regular ethnic census. The Samis call themselves sapmi or sabmi. It is only recently (after 1950) that this name has been generally accepted in the Nordic countries (singular same, plural samer). Tacitus wrote about fenni;1 Old English had finnas;2 Historia NorvegitE (History of Norway) written about P80 had finni,3 and the Norse word was {imzar. 4 In medieval Icelandic and Norwegian literature, Finnmork was the region in northern Scandinavia where the Samis lived. The northern­ most Norwegian fylke (county) of today, Finnmark, takes jts name from the huge medieval Finnmork. But Samis of today still use the name S4pnzi for the entire region where they live (See Map 13.1, ;].. which "shows S4pmiwith state frontiers and some Sami centres). 'Finner' is accordingly an authentic Norwegian name.
    [Show full text]
  • A/HRC/18/35/Add.2
    United Nations A/HRC/18/35/Add.2 General Assembly Distr.: General 6 June 2011 Original: English Human Rights Council Eighteenth session Agenda item 3 Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development Report of the Special Rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples, James Anaya Addendum The situation of the Sami people in the Sápmi region of Norway, Sweden and Finland∗ Summary The present report, which was originally made public in an advanced unedited version on 12 January 2011, examines the human rights situation of the Sami people of Norway, Sweden and Finland. It is based in large part on information presented to the Special Rapporteur during a conference in Rovaniemi, Finland, from 14 to 16 April 2010 organized by the Sami Parliamentary Council. The conference gathered representatives of the Sami parliaments of Norway, Sweden and Finland, Government officials from each of these countries, and representatives of Sami non-governmental organizations. The Special Rapporteur is pleased that, overall, Norway, Sweden, and Finland each pay a high level of attention to indigenous issues, relative to other countries. In many respects, initiatives related to the Sami people in the Nordic countries set important examples for securing the rights of indigenous peoples. Among these initiatives is the cross-border effort to develop a Nordic Sami Convention. The Special Rapporteur notes the important work already achieved toward this end, and he welcomes the commitment on the part of the Nordic States and the Sami parliaments to recommence negotiations in 2011 toward adoption of the Convention.
    [Show full text]
  • A Recent Genetic Link Between Sami and the Volga-Ural Region of Russia
    European Journal of Human Genetics (2007) 15, 115–120 & 2007 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 1018-4813/07 $30.00 www.nature.com/ejhg ARTICLE A recent genetic link between Sami and the Volga-Ural region of Russia Max Ingman1,2 and Ulf Gyllensten*,1 1Department of Genetics and Pathology, Rudbeck Laboratory, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden; 2Centre for Integrative Genomics, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland The genetic origin of the Sami is enigmatic and contributions from Continental Europe, Eastern Europe and Asia have been proposed. To address the evolutionary history of northern and southern Swedish Sami, we have studied their mtDNA haplogroup frequencies and complete mtDNA genome sequences. While the majority of mtDNA diversity in the northern Swedish, Norwegian and Finnish Sami is accounted for by haplogroups V and U5b1b1, the southern Swedish Sami have other haplogroups and a frequency distribution similar to that of the Continental European population. Stratification of the southern Sami on the basis of occupation indicates that this is the result of recent admixture with the Swedish population. The divergence time for the Sami haplogroup V sequences is 7600 YBP (years before present), and for U5b1b1, 5500 YBP amongst Sami and 6600 YBP amongst Sami and Finns. This suggests an arrival in the region soon after the retreat of the glacial ice, either by way of Continental Europe and/or the Volga-Ural region. Haplogroup Z is found at low frequency in the Sami and Northern Asian populations but is virtually absent in Europe. Several conserved substitutions group the Sami Z lineages strongly with those from Finland and the Volga-Ural region of Russia, but distinguish them from Northeast Asian representatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Ations in the Barents Sea Area: Focusing on the Kola Peninsula Organized by Dr
    WORKSHOP REPORT Workshop on inter-ethnic relations in the Barents Sea area: Focusing on the Kola Peninsula Organized by Dr. Reetta Toivanen Dates: 18th October to 19th October 2012 Venue: Porthania, The University of Helsinki Sponsored by: Poga – The Language Survival Network / Academy Research Fellowship “On "Glocal” governance”, Erik Castren Institute, The University of Helsinki The workshop on inter-ethnic relations in the Barents Sea area: Focusing on the Kola Peninsula took place in the Institute of International Law of the University of Helsinki, from 18th to 19th October, 2012. The workshop was initiated and organized by a research fellow from the Academy of Finland, Dr. Reetta Toivanen, Finnish Academy Research project “On "Glocal” governance: On the meanings and consequences of the ‘vernacularization’ of Human Rights Concepts” at the Erik Castren Institute of International Law and Human Rights and Poga – The Language Survival Network. Background The special interest of this research workshop was to consider the power of transnational networks influencing the local interpretations of international “rights discourses”. This means that one aim was to understand how power relationships are debated, negotiated and decided in municipalities where inhabitants belong to different majority and minority populations. One interesting question concerned the way people belonging to language and culture minorities make identity claims: what kinds of identity politics are in place and how are they used? Another question discussed was: in which ways do the – partly imported – rights discourses have an impact on the in-group solidarity among the minority members on the one hand, and on the local solidarity among all the inhabitants of one municipality on the other? The third question addressed the institutional and legal settings enabling or constraining the “cultural survival” of the minority in a multi-ethnic setting.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Minerva Piha University of Turku Combining Proto-Scandinavian loanword strata in South Saami with the Early Iron Age archaeological material of Jämtland and Dalarna, Sweden1 In this article, I will examine South Saami prehistory from the perspectives of archaeol- ogy and historical lexicology. I will present a theoretical model that can be applied to a multidisciplinary research that uses methodologies from both the sciences and test it using South Saami material. My linguistic data consists of North-West Germanic and Early Proto-Scandinavian loanwords in South Saami. Th ese loanword strata can be dat- ed to 1–550 CE. I will make an inventory of the semantic categories of the words in the loanword strata to see from which domains words were borrowed. I will also examine the prominent individual words that might have signifi cance as intercultural markers. Th e archaeological material used in the research includes hunting ground graves, iron manufacturing sites and dwelling sites in Dalarna and Jämtland, Sweden. I will consider remain types, artefact fi nds and remain structures dated to 1–550 CE. Only those sites that have been excavated will be included in the data. I will correlate the lexical fi nds with the archaeological fi nd groups in order to examine what the datasets together re- veal about contacts between the South Saami and Scandinavian speakers. Th e combina- tion of archaeological and lexical research off ers new advantages and perspectives to the study of prehistory. Th e study brings new evidence for the prior hypothesis about South Saami speakers as domestic animal herders.
    [Show full text]
  • Working with Traditional Knowledge: Communities, Institutions, Information Systems, Law and Ethics
    Dieđut 1/2011 Working with Traditional Knowledge: Communities, Institutions, Information Systems, Law and Ethics Writings from the Arbediehtu Pilot Project on Documentation and Protection of Sami Traditional Knowledge Edited by Jelena Porsanger Gunvor Guttorm Sámi allaskuvla / Sámi University College Working with Traditional Knowledge: Communities, Institutions, Information Systems, Law and Ethics Acknow ledge ments Many individuals, local Sami com mu nities and institutions have contri buted to the Árbediehtu pilot project in the period from 2008 to 2011. One of the important objectives of the project has been to listen to and take into account what Sami people expect from the work on documentation and protection of their traditional know ledge. Special gratitude is owed to communities and individuals in the Norwegian, Swedish and Finnish parts of Sápmi, who eagerly participated in community meetings and other project activities. Sami communities have been important partners in the project, which would not have been possible without their support, collabo ration and genuine interest. We are grateful to the communities and all individual árbečeahpit (tradition- bearers) in the following places: In the Coastal Sami area c/o the Sea Sami Centre of Expertise: Jáhkovuotna/Kokelv, Čuđegieddi/Kistrand, Billávuotna/Bille fjord, Cuop pogieddi/Sandvik, Jovnnanjárga/Jonsnes, Ráigešája/Igeldas, Rávt toš njárga/Stabbursnes, Leavdnja/Lakselv, Breannjá/Brenna, Keaisa/Kjæs. In the Lule Sami area c/o the Árran – Lule Sami Centre: Ájluokta/Drag, Gásluokta/Kjøps vik, Ájládde/Hellands berg, Måsske/Musken, Vuodnabahta/Hellemobotn. In the Northern Sami area c/o the museum association RiddoDuottarMuseat: Kárášjohka/Karasjok, Näkkälä järvi, Áidejávri, Guovdageaidnu/ Kauto keino. In the Southern Sami area c/o Saemien Sijte (South Sami Museum and Cultural Centre): The following reindeer herding communities: Luvlie-Nåamesjen Båatsoe/Østre Namdal, Åarjel-Njaarke/Vestre Namdal, Fovsen-Njaarke/Fosen, Låarte/Luru, and Trollheimen Sijte.
    [Show full text]