DOCSLIB.ORG

Air Force Institute of Technology Research Report 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Air Force Institute of Technology Research Report 2015 AFIT/EN/TR-15-03 TECHNICAL REPORT MAR 2016 Air Force Institute of Technology Research Report 2015 Period of Report: 1 Oct 2014 to 30 Sep 2015 Graduate School of Engineering and Management GRADUATE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT AIR FORCE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, OHIO Distribution Statement A. Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. AIR FORCE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio Reproduction of all or part of this document is authorized. This report was edited and produced by the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs, Graduate School of Engineering and Management, Air Force Institute of Technology. The Department of Defense, other federal government, and non-government agencies supported the work reported herein but have not reviewed or endorsed the contents of this report. For additional information, please call or email: 937-255-3633 DSN 785-3633 [email protected] or visit the AFIT website: www.afit.edu ii Air Force Institute of Technology Research Report 2015 Foreword Research programs at the Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT) are aligned with national defense priorities and provide valuable technical and management experiences that enhance our graduates’ performance throughout their careers. To maximize value, AFIT’s research efforts address strategic priorities identified in guidance such as America’s Air Force: A Call to the Future (2014), the United States Air Force Chief Scientist’s report Technology Horizons, A Vision for Air Force Science and Technology During 2010-2030, and the Air Force Science & Technology Strategy 2014. AFIT’s Autonomy and Navigation Technology Center, Center for Cyberspace Research, Center for Directed Energy, Center for Operational Analysis, Center for Technical Intelligence Studies and Research, Center for Space Research and Assurance and other research groups serve as focal points for many of our research initiatives. Emerging research groups are addressing game-changing technologies including hypersonics and human-machine systems, exploring energy security strategies, and developing defense- related additive manufacturing applications. AFIT has strategic partnerships with the Air Force Research Laboratory, the National Air and Space Intelligence Center, the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center, the United States Transportation Command, and many other organizations and operational communities to maximize the contributions of our research programs to national defense needs. Our faculty and students also engage in collaborations with researchers at universities throughout the nation to advance the state-of-the-art in a variety of disciplines. AFIT cooperates with commercial enterprises to ensure timely transfer of new technology to US industry through Cooperative Research and Development Agreements (CRADAs) whenever appropriate. This Research Report is prepared annually to summarize the significant contributions of AFIT; to solicit continued involvement and support from our Air Force, DOD, and other federal partners; and to encourage new sponsors to participate in AFIT’s research programs. AFIT welcomes new opportunities to engage in research projects that are of mutual interest to our customers, faculty, and students. Additional information is available at http://www.afit.edu/ENR/. Heidi R. Ries, Ph.D. Dean for Research Graduate School of Engineering and Management iii TABLE OF CONTENTS AIR FORCE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ........................................................................................................i 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT RESEARCH COLLABORATION .......................................................................................................................................... 1 2. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS .................................................................................................................................. 5 2.1 FACULTY FELLOWS ...................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS ............................................................................................................. 7 2.3 RESEARCH AND TEACHING AWARDS ...................................................................................................... 9 3. RESEARCH STATISTICS ................................................................................................................................... 14 3.1 RESEARCH AND CONSULTING OUTPUT MEASURES .......................................................................... 14 3.2 RESEARCH AND CONSULTING SPONSORSHIP ..................................................................................... 16 3.3 EXTERNAL SPONSOR FUNDING FOR THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................................................................. 19 4. SPONSORSHIP OF STUDENT RESEARCH .................................................................................................... 21 4.1. OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE ................................................................................. 21 4.2. HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES AIR FORCE ..................................................................................... 21 4.3. AIR COMBAT COMMAND ........................................................................................................................... 21 4.4. AIR EDUCATION AND TRAINING COMMAND ....................................................................................... 22 4.5. AIR FORCE MATERIEL COMMAND .......................................................................................................... 26 4.6. AIR MOBILITY COMMAND ........................................................................................................................ 36 4.7. AIR FORCE SPACE COMMAND ................................................................................................................. 37 4.8. USAF FIELD OPERATING AGENCIES/DIRECT REPORTING UNITS .................................................... 37 4.9. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ...................................................................................................................... 39 4.10. OTHER FEDERAL AGENCIES .................................................................................................................. 43 4.11. NON-FEDERAL SPONSORS ...................................................................................................................... 44 5. ACADEMIC DEPARTMENT PUBLICATIONS AND FUNDING INFORMATION ................................... 47 5.1. DEPARTMENT OF AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS ................................................................... 48 5.2. DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING ................................................... 73 5.3. DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING PHYSICS .......................................................................................... 107 5.4. DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS ........................................................................ 134 5.5. DEPARTMENT OF OPERATIONAL SCIENCES ...................................................................................... 148 5.6. DEPARTMENT OF SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT ................................................. 167 6. RESEARCH CENTER PUBLICATIONS AND FUNDING INFORMATION ............................................. 188 6.1. AUTONOMY AND NAVIGATION TECHNOLOGY CENTER ................................................................ 189 6.2. CENTER FOR CYBERSPACE RESEARCH ............................................................................................... 199 6.3. CENTER FOR DIRECTED ENERGY .......................................................................................................... 209 6.4. CENTER FOR OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS .............................................................................................. 216 6.5. CENTER FOR SPACE RESEARCH AND ASSURANCE .......................................................................... 220 6.6. CENTER FOR TECHNICAL INTELLIGENCE STUDIES AND RESEARCH .......................................... 225 7. TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER .............................................................................................................................. 229 7.1. COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS ................................................... 229 7.2. EDUCATIONAL PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENTS .................................................................................... 229 APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................................................. 230 APPENDIX A: POST-DOCTORAL AND OTHER RESEARCH ASSOCIATES’ CREDENTIALS ................ 230 APPENDIX B: SELECTED ACRONYM LIST ................................................................................................... 234 APPENDIX C: INFORMATION FOR OBTAINING A COPY
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Coproduce Or Codevelop Military Aircraft? Analysis of Models Applicable to USAN* Brazilian Political Science Review, Vol
    Brazilian Political Science Review ISSN: 1981-3821 Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política Svartman, Eduardo Munhoz; Teixeira, Anderson Matos Coproduce or Codevelop Military Aircraft? Analysis of Models Applicable to USAN* Brazilian Political Science Review, vol. 12, no. 1, e0005, 2018 Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política DOI: 10.1590/1981-3821201800010005 Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=394357143004 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System Redalyc More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and Journal's webpage in redalyc.org Portugal Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative Coproduce or Codevelop Military Aircraft? Analysis of Models Applicable to USAN* Eduardo Munhoz Svartman Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil Anderson Matos Teixeira Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil The creation of the Union of South American Nations (USAN) aroused expectations about joint development and production of military aircraft in South America. However, political divergences, technological asymmetries and budgetary problems made projects canceled. Faced with the impasse, this article approaches features of two military aircraft development experiences and their links with the regionalization processes to extract elements that help to account for the problems faced by USAN. The processes of adoption of the F-104 and the Tornado in the 1950s and 1970s by countries that later joined the European Union are analyzed in a comparative perspective. The two projects are compared about the political and diplomatic implications (mutual trust, military capabilities and regionalization) and the economic implications (scale of production, value chains and industrial parks).
    [Show full text]
  • Global Military Helicopters 2015-16 Market Report Contents
    GLOBAL MILITARY HELICOPTERS 2015-16 MARKET REPORT CONTENTS MARKET OVERVIEW 2 MILITARY HELICOPTER KEY REQUIREMENTS 4 EUROPE 5 NORTH AMERICA 10 LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN 12 AFRICA 15 ASIA-PACIFIC 16 MIDDLE EAST 21 WORLD MILITARY HELICOPTER HOLDINGS 23 EUROPE 24 NORTH AMERICA 34 LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN 36 AFRICA 43 ASIA-PACIFIC 49 MIDDLE EAST 59 EVENT INFORMATION 65 Please note that all information herein is subject to change. Defence IQ endeavours to ensure accuracy wherever possible, but errors are often unavoidable. We encourage readers to contact us if they note any need for amendments or updates. We accept no responsibility for the use or application of this information. We suggest that readers contact the specific government and military programme offices if seeking to confirm the reliability of any data. 1 MARKET OVERVIEW Broadly speaking, the global helicopter market is currently facing a two- pronged assault. The military helicopter segment has been impacted significantly by continued defense budgetary pressures across most traditional markets, and a recent slide in global crude oil prices has impacted the demand for new civil helicopters as well as the level of activity for existing fleets engaged in the offshore oil & gas exploration sector. This situation has impacted industry OEMs significantly, many of which had been working towards strengthening the civil helicopter segment to partially offset the impact of budgetary cuts on the military segment. However, the medium- to long-term view of the market is promising given the presence of strong fundamentals and persistent, sustainable growth drivers. The market for military helicopters in particular is set to cross a technological threshold in the form of next-generation compound helicopters and tilt rotorcraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Nickel Grass: Airlift in Support of National Policy Capt Chris J
    Secretary of the Air Force Janies F. McGovern Air Force Chief of Staff Gen Larry D. Welch Commander, Air University Lt Gen Ralph Lv Havens Commander, Center for Aerospace Doctrine, Research, and Education Col Sidney J. Wise Editor Col Keith W. Geiger Associate Editor Maj Michael A. Kirtland Professional Staff Hugh Richardson. Contributing Editor Marvin W. Bassett. Contributing Editor John A. Westcott, Art Director and Production Mu linger Steven C. Garst. Art Editor and Illustrator The Airpower Journal, published quarterly, is the professional journal of the United States Air Force. It is designed to serve as an open forum for presenting and stimulating innovative thinking on military doctrine, strategy, tactics, force structure, readiness, and other national defense matters. The views and opinions ex- pressed or implied in the Journal are those of the authors and should not be construed as car- rying the official sanction of the Department of Defense, the Air Force, Air University, or other agencies or departments of the US government. Articles in this edition may be reproduced in whole or in part without permission. If repro- duced, the Airpower Journal requests a cour- tesy line. JOURNAL SPRING 1989. Vol. Ill, No. I AFRP 50 2 Editorial 2 Air Interdiction Col Clifford R. Kxieger, USAF 4 Operation Nickel Grass: Airlift in Support of National Policy Capt Chris J. Krisinger, USAF 16 Paradox of the Headless Horseman Lt Col Joe Boyles, USAF Capt Greg K. Mittelman, USAF 29 A Rare Feeling of Satisfaction Maj Michael A. Kirtland, USAF 34 Weaseling in the BUFF Col A. Lee Harrell, USAF 36 Thinking About Air Power Maj Andrew J.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrorist and Organized Crime Groups in the Tri-Border Area (Tba) of South America
    TERRORIST AND ORGANIZED CRIME GROUPS IN THE TRI-BORDER AREA (TBA) OF SOUTH AMERICA A Report Prepared by the Federal Research Division, Library of Congress under an Interagency Agreement with the Crime and Narcotics Center Director of Central Intelligence July 2003 (Revised December 2010) Author: Rex Hudson Project Manager: Glenn Curtis Federal Research Division Library of Congress Washington, D.C. 205404840 Tel: 2027073900 Fax: 2027073920 E-Mail: [email protected] Homepage: http://loc.gov/rr/frd/ p 55 Years of Service to the Federal Government p 1948 – 2003 Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Tri-Border Area (TBA) PREFACE This report assesses the activities of organized crime groups, terrorist groups, and narcotics traffickers in general in the Tri-Border Area (TBA) of Argentina, Brazil, and Paraguay, focusing mainly on the period since 1999. Some of the related topics discussed, such as governmental and police corruption and anti–money-laundering laws, may also apply in part to the three TBA countries in general in addition to the TBA. This is unavoidable because the TBA cannot be discussed entirely as an isolated entity. Based entirely on open sources, this assessment has made extensive use of books, journal articles, and other reports available in the Library of Congress collections. It is based in part on the author’s earlier research paper entitled “Narcotics-Funded Terrorist/Extremist Groups in Latin America” (May 2002). It has also made extensive use of sources available on the Internet, including Argentine, Brazilian, and Paraguayan newspaper articles. One of the most relevant Spanish-language sources used for this assessment was Mariano César Bartolomé’s paper entitled Amenazas a la seguridad de los estados: La triple frontera como ‘área gris’ en el cono sur americano [Threats to the Security of States: The Triborder as a ‘Grey Area’ in the Southern Cone of South America] (2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Air University Review: September-October 1968, Volume XIX, No. 6
    AIR U N I VE R S ITY AIR TRAINING COMMAND: PROVIDING FOR THE FUTURE SEPTEMBER OCTOBER 1968 AIR U N IVE R S ITY REVI EW THE P R O F E S S I O N A l JO U R N A L OF THE U N I T E D S TA TE S AIR FORCE Air Traininc Com ma n d Looks to the Future....................................................................................2 Lt. Gen. Sam Maddux, Jr., usaf T oward I n d iv id u a l iz ed Instruction....................................................................................................................10 Lt. Col. Vernon J. Elslager, usaf B eh a vior a l l y Oriented Instruction in ATC.................................................................................................21 John P. Murphy M il it a r y Assist a n c e Traininc Program.......................................................................................................27 Lt. Col. Frank H. Robertson, usaf Air c r a f t Maintenance Traininc for Southeast Asia .......................................................................37 Maj. Frank F. E. Hense, Jr., usaf Survival Tr a in in g .......................................................................................................................................................... 42 2d Lt. Robert M. Zickes, usaf “I nexorable” Is the Word.......................................................................................................................................52 Col. Robert D. Curtis, usaf How Do I Know He Knows I Know? .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SAM-AT Project Development Plan for the Sustainability of Air Transport
    INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION SOUTH AMERICAN REGIONAL OFFICE SAM‐AT Project Development Plan for the Sustainability of Air Transport Growth in the South American Region Institutional Strengthening Module of the Aircraft Accident Investigation Authorities DRAFT Lima, March 2017 1 Contents Executive summary 3 Introduction 9 Model used for the study 11 Authorities of the South American Region studied 17 Analysis of the independence of the authorities studied 59 Conclusions 63 DRAFT 2 Executive Summary The States of the South American Region are signatories to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, signed in Chicago on December 7, 1944 (Chicago Convention), and are Contracting States of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), body responsible for implementing the provisions of the Convention. As signatories to the Chicago Convention, States have adopted a legal and regulatory framework in the field of civil aviation, based on the provisions of the Convention and in the international standards, recommended practices and procedures prescribed in its 19 Annexes. In that context the civil aviation authorities formulate, promulgate and oversee the implementation of at se of national rules governing civil aviation, air transport and aircraft accident investigation among other aeronautical activities in each State. In conformity with Article 26 of the Chicago Convention, it is incumbent on the State in which an aircraft accident occurs to institute an inquiry into the circumstances of the accident. This obligation can be met only when appropriate legislation on aircraft accident investigation is in place. Such legislation shall make provision for the establishment of an accident investigation authority (or commission, board or other body) for the investigation of aircraft accidents and incidents that is independent from State aviation authorities and other entities that could interfere with the conduct or objectivity of an investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Air & Space Power Journal
    Chief of Staff, US Air Force Gen John P. Jumper Commander, Air Education and Training Command Gen Donald G. Cook http://www.af.mil Commander, Air University Lt Gen John F. Regni Commandant, College of Aerospace Doctrine, Research and Education Col David S. Fadok Editor Lt Col Paul D. Berg Senior Editor Lt Col Malcolm D. Grimes http://www.aetc.randolph.af.mil Associate Editor Maj Donald R. Ferguson Editor and Military Defense Analyst Col Larry Carter, USAF, Retired Professional Staff Marvin W. Bassett, Contributing Editor Philip S. Adkins, Contributing Editor Debbie Banker, Editorial Assistant Sherry Terrell, Editorial Assistant Steven C. Garst, Director of Art and Production Daniel M. Armstrong, Illustrator http://www.au.af.mil L. Susan Fair, Illustrator Ann Bailey, Prepress Production Manager Air and Space Power Chronicles Luetwinder T. Eaves, Managing Editor The Air and Space Power Journal, published quarterly, is the professional flagship publication of the United States Air Force. It is designed to serve as an open forum for the presentation and stimulation of innova­ tive thinking on military doctrine, strategy, tactics, http://www.cadre.maxwell.af.mil force structure, readiness, and other matters of na­ tional defense. The views and opinions expressed or implied in the Journal are those of the authors and should not be construed as carrying the official sanc­ tion of the Department of Defense, Air Force, Air Education and Training Command, Air University, or other agencies or departments of the US government. Articles in this edition may be reproduced in whole or Visit Air and Space Power Journal online in part without permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Influencing the Defeat of Argentine Air Power in the Falklands War the Royal Canadian Air Force Journal Vol
    FACTORSTHE ROYAL CANADIAN AIR FOrcE JOURNAL INVOL. 1 | NFO. 4 LUENC FALL 2012 ING THE DEFEAT OF ARGENTINE AiR POWER IN THE FALKLANDS WAR BY OffiCER CADET COLIN CLANSEY, CD A column of No. 45 Royal Marine Commandos march toward Port Stanley. Royal Marine Peter Robinson, carrying the Union Jack flag on his backpack as identification, brings up the rear. © Crown copyright. Imperial War Museum (IWM) www.iwm.org.uk/sites/default/files/ public-document/IWM_NonCommercial_Licence_1.pdf 8 Factors Influencing the Defeat of Argentine Air Power in the Falklands War THE ROYAL CANADIAN AIR FOrcE JOURNAL VOL. 1 | NO. 4 FALL 2012 he Argentine defeat in the Falkland takeover, leave, and negotiate to one of defend Islands War was due in part to the over- the islands at all costs. The invasion precipi- whelming superiority of the Royal Navy tated a furious British response in the form of T (RN).1 Most of the action, however, a large-scale military mobilization to retake involved the air powers of the Royal Air Force the Islands. Forced now to adopt a defensive (RAF), the Fleet Air Arm of the RN, the posture, Galtieri unilaterally ordered the Fuerza Aérea Argentina (FAA) or Argentine airlift of the entire 10th Mechanised Brigade Air Force, and the Commando de Aviación and the 3rd Brigade (a total well over 10,000 Naval Argentina (CANA) or Argentine Naval troops) to the Islands for their defence, a Air Command.2 This paper will analyse the drastic increase from the initial 500 used strategy and tactics of the Argentine air forces for the invasion.8 That he took this decision as the most effective arm of the Argentine without consulting his own senior staff shows military junta.
    [Show full text]
  • Argentina - Peer Review of Competition Law and Policy 2006
    Argentina - Peer Review of Competition Law and Policy 2006 “Peer review” is a core element of OECD work. The mechanisms of peer review vary, but it is founded upon the willingness of all OECD countries and their partners to submit their laws and policies to substantive questioning by other members. Argentina’s competition law and policy have been subject to such review in 2006. This report was prepared by Mr. John Clark for the OECD. 2006 Derecho y Política de la Competencia en Argentina ◆ Examen inter-pares Política de la Competencia en Argentina en Competencia la de Política y Derecho Derecho A Peer Review Peer A ◆ Policy in Argentina in Policy Competition Law and and Law Competition 2006 BANCO INTERAMERICANO DE DESARROLLO Competition Law and Policy in Argentina in Policy and Law Competition 25*$1,6$7,21Ã)25Ã(&2120,&Ã ,17(5$0(5,&$1Ã &223(5$7,21Ã$1'Ã '(9(/230(17Ã%$1. '(9(/230(17 COMPETITION LAW AND POLICY IN ARGENTINA A Peer Review -- 2006 -- ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT Pursuant to Article 1 of the Convention signed in Paris on 14th December 1960, and which came into force on 30th September 1961, the Organisation for Economic Co- operation and Development (OECD) shall promote policies designed: - to achieve the highest sustainable economic growth and employment and a rising standard of living in Member countries, while maintaining financial stability, and thus to contribute to the development of the world economy; - to contribute to sound economic expansion in Member as well as non-member countries in the process of economic development; and - to contribute to the expansion of world trade on a multilateral, non- discriminatory basis in accordance with international obligations.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2008 Volume XXII, No
    Fall 2008 Volume XXII, No. 3 AFRP 10-1 Senior Leader Perspectives The Transformation of Air Forces on the Korean Peninsula . 5 Lt Gen Stephen G. Wood, USAF Maj Christopher A. Johnson, DM, USAF Airpower Imbalance: Nuclear Pakistan’s Achilles’ Heel . 13 Air Commodore Tariq Mahmud Ashraf, Pakistan Air Force, Retired Focus Area Redefining Air, Space, and Cyber Power . 25 Lt Col Paul D. Berg, USAF, Chief, Professional Journals Features The Strategic Role of Airpower: An Indian Perspective on How We Need to Think, Train, and Fight in the Coming Years . 56 Air Commodore Arjun Subramaniam, Indian Air Force Rethinking the Combined Force Air Component Commander’s Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Approach to Counterinsurgency . 67 Lt Col Michael L. Downs, USAF Revisiting South African Airpower Thought: Considering Some Challenges and Tensions in Southern Africa . 77 Dr. Francois Vreÿ Dr. Abel Esterhuyse Strategy and Cost: A Gap in Our Military Decision-Making Process . 89 Lt Col Lawrence Spinetta, USAF Go Pills in Combat: Prejudice, Propriety, and Practicality . 97 Dr. John A. Caldwell Departments Prelaunch Notes Selecting ASPJ Focus Areas and Presenting the Latest Chronicles Online Journal Articles . 18 Ricochets and Replies . 19 Ira C. Eaker Award Winners . 26 The Merge Reply to “A New Form of Air Warfare” . 27 Col José C. D’Odorico, Argentine Air Force, Retired The Mission Matters Most . 29 Lt Col Graham W. Rinehart, USAF, Retired Know Your Enemy . 31 Col Thomas E. Snodgrass, USAF, Retired 2008-3 contents.indd 1 7/28/08 7:17:15 AM Planetary Defense: Potential Mitigation Roles of the Department of Defense .
    [Show full text]
  • Global Report Helicopter.Pdf
    1 The world’s military helicopter fleets in 2025 currently due to retire in 2025, and possibly for look set to be dominated by the Sikorsky S-70, the Royal Navy’s AW101 MERLIN HM.Mk 2s the Boeing Chonook, the Mil Mi-17 HIP, the and HC MK 4/4As from 2035. Airbus PUMA/Super PUMA family and the Boeing AH-64 Apache, together with the Tilt-rotors might be in more widespread NH90s, Leonardo AW101 MERLINS and service by 2025, with the 316mph V-22 likely AW139/149/169/189s. to gain further customers, and the Leonardo AW609 gaining its first military customer in The AW139 has proven popular with military the shape of the UAE Air Force and Air operators, with more than 100 delivered or on Defence, which ordered three aircraft for SAR order. The Irish Air Corps became the first use by its Joint Aviation Command. military operator of the type, taking delivery of the first of six AW139s in August 2006. The None of the promising compound helicopter type has since been delivered to 19 air forces, and tilt-rotor designs and demonstrator including those of Algeria, Pakistan, Qatar and programmes are likely to lead to frontline the United Arab Emirates. derivatives in any meaningful near-term timescale. The AW149 is an enlarged military derivative with a larger fuselage and more powerful What this means is that most of the world’s engines. Thailand has ordered five AW149 military helicopter fleets in 2025 will look helicopters for the Royal Thai Army, and the much the same as today’s, relying mainly on type has been marketed to South Africa as a the same types, though tactics and doctrine potential replacement for the ageing SAAF will undoubtedly continue to evolve and there ORYX fleet.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States District Court for the District of Kansas
    Case 6:17-cv-01085-JTM-GLR Document 53 Filed 05/04/17 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS HWB VICTORIA STRATEGIES PORTFOLIO, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. THE REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA, Case No. 17-1085-JTM Defendant, and GE ENGINE SERVICES, L.L.C., et al.,, Garnishees.. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER The plaintiff judgment creditors obtained a Cowley County, Kansas court order for attachment and writ of execution for two aircraft engines belonging to the debtor Republic of Argentina and located at the General Electric GE Engine Services plant at Strother Field in Arkansas City, Kansas. The Republic removed the collection action to this court, and has moved to vacate the attachment and quash the writ. Garnishees General Electric Company and GE Engine Services join in the motion. For the reasons provided herein, the court grants the motions of defendants and garnishees. Case 6:17-cv-01085-JTM-GLR Document 53 Filed 05/04/17 Page 2 of 8 Prior to commencing the enforcement action in Kansas state court, on March 31, 2017, the plaintiffs1 brought a similar action seeking to attach these engines in Ohio. The district court in that case rejected the plaintiff’s request for relief, not only because the engines were determined to be in Kansas rather than Ohio, but also finding that the engines, which belong to the Air Force of the Republic of Argentina, are immune from attachment under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), 28 U.S.C. § 1062 et seq. See HWB Victoria Strategies Portfolio v.
    [Show full text]