DOCSLIB.ORG

Air University Review: September-October 1968, Volume XIX, No. 6

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Air University Review: September-October 1968, Volume XIX, No. 6 AIR U N I VE R S ITY AIR TRAINING COMMAND: PROVIDING FOR THE FUTURE SEPTEMBER OCTOBER 1968 AIR U N IVE R S ITY REVI EW THE P R O F E S S I O N A l JO U R N A L OF THE U N I T E D S TA TE S AIR FORCE Air Traininc Com ma n d Looks to the Future....................................................................................2 Lt. Gen. Sam Maddux, Jr., usaf T oward I n d iv id u a l iz ed Instruction....................................................................................................................10 Lt. Col. Vernon J. Elslager, usaf B eh a vior a l l y Oriented Instruction in ATC.................................................................................................21 John P. Murphy M il it a r y Assist a n c e Traininc Program.......................................................................................................27 Lt. Col. Frank H. Robertson, usaf Air c r a f t Maintenance Traininc for Southeast Asia .......................................................................37 Maj. Frank F. E. Hense, Jr., usaf Survival Tr a in in g .......................................................................................................................................................... 42 2d Lt. Robert M. Zickes, usaf “I nexorable” Is the Word.......................................................................................................................................52 Col. Robert D. Curtis, usaf How Do I Know He Knows I Know? ........................................................................................ 67 Capt. Allen K. Taylor, usaf Air Force Review T he Tec h n iques of Modern Rec r uiting ................................................................................................ 73 Brig. Gen. J. T. Scepansky, usaf P a r a m il it a r y Forces Need a New M issio n ................................................................................................ 85 Maj. Joel J. Snyder, usaf In My Opinion Humane Warfare for International Pea c ekeeping ................................................................ 91 Lt. Col. Amold J. Celick, usaf Books and Ideas I nto the Air with ATC................................................................................................................................94 Gen. Frederic H. Smith, Jr., usaf (Ret) T he La byr in t h ia n W orld of Soviet Mil it a r y Doctrine................................ 95 Dr. Kenneth R. Whiting T he Contributors..........................................................................................................................................................98 um m the cover Address manuscripts to: Editor, Air Univer- sity Review, Aerospace Studies Institute, Max- One of the earlier associations an airman has well Air Force Base, Ala. 36112. Printed by with Air Training Command is the issuing of Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. the uniform and the trying on of caps. Later Subscriptions are sold by Air University Boolc Department, Maxwelí Air Force Base, exposure to the command is more enduring Ala. 36112: yearly $4.50, back issues 75 and certainly more significant in terms of cents. USAF kecurrinc pu bl ic a t io n 50-2. long-range usefulness to the Air Force and the nation. In this issue of Air University Review, Lt. Gen. Sam Maddux, Jr., ATC Com- mander, and several members of his command discuss salient aspects of their mission: Vol. XIX No. 6 September -O ctober 1968 "Preparing the Man” for an Air Force career. f- / V AIR TRAINING COMMAND LOOKS TO THE FUTURE L eeut en a n t Gen er a l Sam Maddux, J r . T IS generally accepted that the United States Air Force is the most technolog- I ically and scientifically advanced military force in the world today. Our aerospaee team is equipped with highly sophisticated weapon systems, the most effective that Air Force planners and the civilian aerospaee industry can provide for the defense of this country and for the protection of the Free World. To look back over the 23 years since the end of World War II, to consider our air power then, to follow it through the develop- ment stages of the postwar years, and then to realize what the force is comprised of today is a reassuring assessment. In less tlian a quarter of a century, a whole new spectrum of hardware and doctrine has been envi- sioned and brought into operational employ- ment. This was not just a quarter of a century of advancement. It was also a period of mili- tary thrusts and political harassments by our adversaries bringing about many local situa- tions on the worlds geopolitical front which had to be dealt with as the aerospaee force continued to take form. Preparing the man for today s aerospaee force is the task of Air Training Command (atc). Various top-echelon air leaders have expounded repeatedly that a weapon system, however technical and effective it may be, is no better than the men who operate, maintain, and support it. atc has the responsibility of selecting, processing, and training officers and airmen for these duties. As one of the Air Forces largest com- mands, atc averages about 131,000 military personnel assigned, including students, and 3 21,000 civilian employees. The training fleet To provide the Air Force with people who has approximately 2000 aircraft of 13 different have the necessary physical and mental quali- types. fications is vital to its continued capabihty to In its 25 years of operation, atc has con- perform assigned aerospace missions. As Air ducted courses of instruction for more than 7 Force requirements change, there is an ac- million personnel. Almost every member of companying change in the number and types the Air Force receives training at least once of recruitment programs. The recruiting effort, under atc supervision. Many retnm several which enlists over 100,000 replacements each times to upgrade skills or to change to an- year, is further complicated by several factors other field as the aerospace force introduces which affect recruiting in varying degrees and new systems. over which neither the Air Force nor atc has Currently, atc trains about 700,000 Air any control. These are selective Service laws, Force personnel yearly, conducts more than nationwide employment trends, civilian wage 3000 courses at 16 command bases, and has scales, overseas military commitments, and the 146 field training detachments at other U.S. general worldwide political environment. bases and throughout the world, including Basic to all recruitment activities is the Southeast Asia. Other training squadrons are face-to-face contact between the locally as- located on bases of other commands. In addi- signed recruiter-salesman and prospective re- tion to Air Force requirements, several thou- cruits. Future changes and refinements in the sand Air National Guard, reservist, and foreign recruiting system will be directed toward students are trained each year. atc conducts assisting the local recruiter to increase his training of foreign students under the Military effectiveness. Assistance Training Program, with personnel The introduction of data automation into from as many as 60 nations attending the selection and assignment actions for non-prior- command’s technical and flying schools at service personnel has had a major impact on various times. the recruiting operation. Implementation of Basically, atc has four broad missions— the Selective, Qualitative Airman Recruiting personnel recruiting, military training, techni- System (sq a r s) plays a most important role in cal training, and flying training, of which this undertaking. survival and special training are a part. sq a r s was developed in two phases. Phase I, implemented in 1965, provided Computer creasing number of Air Force specialties based Processing of airman personnel data in basic on the trend toward a vastly greater variety military training and Officer Training School, of equipment to be used in the Air Force. As and also yielded management products for the re-enlistment rates are not expected to change personnel processing activities at Lackland greatly, there will be increasing emphasis on Military Training Center. Phase II, imple- providing only essential technical training for mented in January 1967, makes use of the effective first-term job application. Computer for classification of basic trainees Implementation of a maintenance concept for most technical school courses and directed which emphasizes removal and replacement duty assignments. The system employs a math- procedures as a first-line function will increase ematical technique to determine the best pos- development of built-in test, automatic self- sible array of assignments for any given group check, and “remove and replacement only” of basic trainees. functions. Fewer highly skilled maintenance Basic military training continues as a personnel will be required at this levei. De- single-phase program to be completed by all ployment of automatic test equipment and non-prior-service personnel before assignment maintenance of microminiaturized circuitry to formal technical training or to an Air Force will require a higher ratio of skilled to semi- unit for on-the-job training (ojt). There is a skilled personnel. possibility that basic training will be extended Fundamentais training and initial equip- to eight weeks, to provide initial training in ment-oriented phases of technical courses will the unique requirement of living and working tend to become shorter and more specifically in a combat environment. keyed to actual
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Coproduce Or Codevelop Military Aircraft? Analysis of Models Applicable to USAN* Brazilian Political Science Review, Vol
    Brazilian Political Science Review ISSN: 1981-3821 Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política Svartman, Eduardo Munhoz; Teixeira, Anderson Matos Coproduce or Codevelop Military Aircraft? Analysis of Models Applicable to USAN* Brazilian Political Science Review, vol. 12, no. 1, e0005, 2018 Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política DOI: 10.1590/1981-3821201800010005 Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=394357143004 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System Redalyc More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and Journal's webpage in redalyc.org Portugal Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative Coproduce or Codevelop Military Aircraft? Analysis of Models Applicable to USAN* Eduardo Munhoz Svartman Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil Anderson Matos Teixeira Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil The creation of the Union of South American Nations (USAN) aroused expectations about joint development and production of military aircraft in South America. However, political divergences, technological asymmetries and budgetary problems made projects canceled. Faced with the impasse, this article approaches features of two military aircraft development experiences and their links with the regionalization processes to extract elements that help to account for the problems faced by USAN. The processes of adoption of the F-104 and the Tornado in the 1950s and 1970s by countries that later joined the European Union are analyzed in a comparative perspective. The two projects are compared about the political and diplomatic implications (mutual trust, military capabilities and regionalization) and the economic implications (scale of production, value chains and industrial parks).
    [Show full text]
  • Global Military Helicopters 2015-16 Market Report Contents
    GLOBAL MILITARY HELICOPTERS 2015-16 MARKET REPORT CONTENTS MARKET OVERVIEW 2 MILITARY HELICOPTER KEY REQUIREMENTS 4 EUROPE 5 NORTH AMERICA 10 LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN 12 AFRICA 15 ASIA-PACIFIC 16 MIDDLE EAST 21 WORLD MILITARY HELICOPTER HOLDINGS 23 EUROPE 24 NORTH AMERICA 34 LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN 36 AFRICA 43 ASIA-PACIFIC 49 MIDDLE EAST 59 EVENT INFORMATION 65 Please note that all information herein is subject to change. Defence IQ endeavours to ensure accuracy wherever possible, but errors are often unavoidable. We encourage readers to contact us if they note any need for amendments or updates. We accept no responsibility for the use or application of this information. We suggest that readers contact the specific government and military programme offices if seeking to confirm the reliability of any data. 1 MARKET OVERVIEW Broadly speaking, the global helicopter market is currently facing a two- pronged assault. The military helicopter segment has been impacted significantly by continued defense budgetary pressures across most traditional markets, and a recent slide in global crude oil prices has impacted the demand for new civil helicopters as well as the level of activity for existing fleets engaged in the offshore oil & gas exploration sector. This situation has impacted industry OEMs significantly, many of which had been working towards strengthening the civil helicopter segment to partially offset the impact of budgetary cuts on the military segment. However, the medium- to long-term view of the market is promising given the presence of strong fundamentals and persistent, sustainable growth drivers. The market for military helicopters in particular is set to cross a technological threshold in the form of next-generation compound helicopters and tilt rotorcraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Major General Timothy M. Ray U N I T E D S T a T E S a I R F O R
    Page 1 of 3 U N I T E D S T A T E S A I R F O R C E MAJOR GENERAL TIMOTHY M. RAY Maj. Gen. Timothy Ray is the Director of Global Power Programs in the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition, Headquarters U.S. Air Force, Washington, D.C. He is responsible for the directing, planning and programming of 159 Air Force, joint service and international programs with a $10 billion annual budget. General Ray received his commission from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1985. He completed undergraduate pilot training and has held operational flying assignments in the T-38 and B- 52, serving as an instructor, evaluator pilot and squadron commander. He has also flown the B-1 and commanded the 7th Bomb Wing at Dyess Air Force Base, Texas. General Ray had various staff assignments at the major command, Headquarters U.S. Air Force and combatant command levels, as well as served as Commanding General, NATO Air Training Command – Afghanistan, NATO Training Mission – Afghanistan/Combined Security Transition Command – Afghanistan; and Commander, 438th Air Expeditionary Wing, Kabul, Afghanistan. Prior to his current assignment, he was Director, Operational Planning, Policy and Strategy, Deputy Chief of Staff, Operations, Plans and Requirements, Headquarters U.S. Air Force, Washington, D.C. EDUCATION 1985 Bachelor of Science degree in human factors engineering, U.S. Air Force Academy, Colorado Springs, Colo. 1994 Distinguished graduate, Squadron Officer School, Maxwell AFB, Ala. 1998 Master of Science degree in aviation sciences and management, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, Fla.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Nickel Grass: Airlift in Support of National Policy Capt Chris J
    Secretary of the Air Force Janies F. McGovern Air Force Chief of Staff Gen Larry D. Welch Commander, Air University Lt Gen Ralph Lv Havens Commander, Center for Aerospace Doctrine, Research, and Education Col Sidney J. Wise Editor Col Keith W. Geiger Associate Editor Maj Michael A. Kirtland Professional Staff Hugh Richardson. Contributing Editor Marvin W. Bassett. Contributing Editor John A. Westcott, Art Director and Production Mu linger Steven C. Garst. Art Editor and Illustrator The Airpower Journal, published quarterly, is the professional journal of the United States Air Force. It is designed to serve as an open forum for presenting and stimulating innovative thinking on military doctrine, strategy, tactics, force structure, readiness, and other national defense matters. The views and opinions ex- pressed or implied in the Journal are those of the authors and should not be construed as car- rying the official sanction of the Department of Defense, the Air Force, Air University, or other agencies or departments of the US government. Articles in this edition may be reproduced in whole or in part without permission. If repro- duced, the Airpower Journal requests a cour- tesy line. JOURNAL SPRING 1989. Vol. Ill, No. I AFRP 50 2 Editorial 2 Air Interdiction Col Clifford R. Kxieger, USAF 4 Operation Nickel Grass: Airlift in Support of National Policy Capt Chris J. Krisinger, USAF 16 Paradox of the Headless Horseman Lt Col Joe Boyles, USAF Capt Greg K. Mittelman, USAF 29 A Rare Feeling of Satisfaction Maj Michael A. Kirtland, USAF 34 Weaseling in the BUFF Col A. Lee Harrell, USAF 36 Thinking About Air Power Maj Andrew J.
    [Show full text]
  • Cradle of Airpower Education
    Cradle of Airpower Education Maxwell Air Force Base Centennial April 1918 – April 2018 A Short History of The Air University, Maxwell AFB, and the 42nd Air Base Wing Air University Directorate of History March 2019 1 2 Cradle of Airpower Education A Short History of The Air University, Maxwell AFB, and 42nd Air Base Wing THE INTELLECTUAL AND LEADERSHIP- DEVELOPMENT CENTER OF THE US AIR FORCE Air University Directorate of History Table of Contents Origins and Early Development 3 The Air Corps Tactical School Period 3 Maxwell Field during World War II 4 Early Years of Air University 6 Air University during the Vietnam War 7 Air University after the Vietnam War 7 Air University in the Post-Cold War Era 8 Chronology of Key Events 11 Air University Commanders and Presidents 16 Maxwell Post/Base Commanders 17 Lineage and Honors: Air University 20 Lineage and Honors: 42nd Bombardment Wing 21 “Be the intellectual and leadership-development center of the Air Force Develop leaders, enrich minds, advance airpower, build relationships, and inspire service.” 3 Origins and Early Development The history of Maxwell Air Force Base began with Orville and Wilbur Wright, who, following their 1903 historic flight, decided in early 1910 to open a flying school to teach people how to fly and to promote the sale of their airplane. After looking at locations in Florida, Wilbur came to Montgomery, Alabama in February 1910 and decided to open the nation’s first civilian flying school on an old cotton plantation near Montgomery that subsequently become Maxwell Air Force Base (AFB).
    [Show full text]
  • Airpower in Three Wars
    AIRPOWER IN THREE WARS GENERAL WILLIAM W. MOMYER USAF, RET. Reprint Edition EDITORS: MANAGING EDITOR - LT COL A. J. C. LAVALLE, MS TEXTUAL EDITOR - MAJOR JAMES C. GASTON, PHD ILLUSTRATED BY: LT COL A. J. C. LAVALLE Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama April 2003 Air University Library Cataloging Data Momyer, William W. Airpower in three wars / William W. Momyer ; managing editor, A. J. C. Lavalle ; textual editor, James C. Gaston ; illustrated by A. J. C. Lavalle–– Reprinted. p. ; cm. With a new preface. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-58566-116-3 1. Airpower. 2. World War, 1939–1945––Aerial operations. 3. Korean War. 1950–1953––Aerial operations. 4. Vietnamese Conflict, 1961–1975––Aerial oper- ations. 5. Momyer, William W. 6. Aeronautics, Military––United States. I. Title. II. Lavalle, A. J. C. (Arthur J. C.), 1940– III. Gaston, James C. 358.4/009/04––dc21 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release. Air University Press 131 West Shumacher Avenue Maxwell AFB AL 36112-6615 http://aupress.maxwell.af.mil ii TO . all those brave airmen who fought their battles in the skies for command of the air in World War II, Korea, and Vietnam. iii THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK PREFACE 2003 When I received the request to update my 1978 foreword to this book, I thought it might be useful to give my perspective of some aspects on the employment of airpower in the Persian Gulf War, the Air War over Serbia (Operation Allied Force), and the war in Afghanistan (Operation Enduring Freedom).
    [Show full text]
  • NATO Air Command-Afghanistan
    Senior Leader Perspective NATO Air Command–Afghanistan The Continuing Evolution of Airpower Command and Control Maj Gen Kenneth S. Wilsbach, USAF Lt Col David J. Lyle, USAF he evolution of cooperation between air and ground forces over the last 12 years in Afghanistan has been continuous and dy- namic. What began in 2001 as special operators on horseback Tcalling in precision air strikes from distantly based aircraft has transi- tioned to the 9th Air and Space Expeditionary Task Force–Afghanistan (9 AETF-A). The command and control (C2) of airpower in Afghani- stan remains agile, providing airpower effects at the right place and time. This article offers the perspective of the senior US / North Atlan- tic Treaty Organization (NATO) Airman on the ground in Kabul and de- scribes the latest developments in airpower C2 in Afghanistan. January–February 2014 Air & Space Power Journal | 11 Senior Leader Perspective The Evolution of Air Command and Control in Afghanistan: From the ACCE to the Five-Hatted Commander The Five Hats of the Commander Theair component coordination element (ACCE), the combined force air component commander’s (CFACC) representative to the commander of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF), ensures that the latter has a direct link to the combined air operations center (CAOC). The 9 AETF-A commander holds operational control and administrative control of all US Air Force forces in the Combined Joint Operations Area–Afghanistan as the senior US Air Force Airman, with the exception of special operations forces. The US Forces–Afghanistan (USFOR-A) deputy commander for air works air issues associated with USFOR-A as the senior US Airman.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrorist and Organized Crime Groups in the Tri-Border Area (Tba) of South America
    TERRORIST AND ORGANIZED CRIME GROUPS IN THE TRI-BORDER AREA (TBA) OF SOUTH AMERICA A Report Prepared by the Federal Research Division, Library of Congress under an Interagency Agreement with the Crime and Narcotics Center Director of Central Intelligence July 2003 (Revised December 2010) Author: Rex Hudson Project Manager: Glenn Curtis Federal Research Division Library of Congress Washington, D.C. 205404840 Tel: 2027073900 Fax: 2027073920 E-Mail: [email protected] Homepage: http://loc.gov/rr/frd/ p 55 Years of Service to the Federal Government p 1948 – 2003 Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Tri-Border Area (TBA) PREFACE This report assesses the activities of organized crime groups, terrorist groups, and narcotics traffickers in general in the Tri-Border Area (TBA) of Argentina, Brazil, and Paraguay, focusing mainly on the period since 1999. Some of the related topics discussed, such as governmental and police corruption and anti–money-laundering laws, may also apply in part to the three TBA countries in general in addition to the TBA. This is unavoidable because the TBA cannot be discussed entirely as an isolated entity. Based entirely on open sources, this assessment has made extensive use of books, journal articles, and other reports available in the Library of Congress collections. It is based in part on the author’s earlier research paper entitled “Narcotics-Funded Terrorist/Extremist Groups in Latin America” (May 2002). It has also made extensive use of sources available on the Internet, including Argentine, Brazilian, and Paraguayan newspaper articles. One of the most relevant Spanish-language sources used for this assessment was Mariano César Bartolomé’s paper entitled Amenazas a la seguridad de los estados: La triple frontera como ‘área gris’ en el cono sur americano [Threats to the Security of States: The Triborder as a ‘Grey Area’ in the Southern Cone of South America] (2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Silver Wings, Golden Valor: the USAF Remembers Korea
    Silver Wings, Golden Valor: The USAF Remembers Korea Edited by Dr. Richard P. Hallion With contributions by Sen. Ben Nighthorse Campbell Maj. Gen. Philip J. Conley, Jr. The Hon. F. Whitten Peters, SecAF Gen. T. Michael Moseley Gen. Michael E. Ryan, CSAF Brig. Gen. Michael E. DeArmond Gen. Russell E. Dougherty AVM William Harbison Gen. Bryce Poe II Col. Harold Fischer Gen. John A. Shaud Col. Jesse Jacobs Gen. William Y. Smith Dr. Christopher Bowie Lt. Gen. William E. Brown, Jr. Dr. Daniel Gouré Lt. Gen. Charles R. Heflebower Dr. Richard P. Hallion Maj. Gen. Arnold W. Braswell Dr. Wayne W. Thompson Air Force History and Museums Program Washington, D.C. 2006 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Silver Wings, Golden Valor: The USAF Remembers Korea / edited by Richard P. Hallion; with contributions by Ben Nighthorse Campbell... [et al.]. p. cm. Proceedings of a symposium on the Korean War held at the U.S. Congress on June 7, 2000. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Korean War, 1950-1953—United States—Congresses. 2. United States. Air Force—History—Korean War, 1950-1953—Congresses. I. Hallion, Richard. DS919.R53 2006 951.904’2—dc22 2006015570 Dedication This work is dedicated with affection and respect to the airmen of the United States Air Force who flew and fought in the Korean War. They flew on silver wings, but their valor was golden and remains ever bright, ever fresh. Foreword To some people, the Korean War was just a “police action,” preferring that euphemism to what it really was — a brutal and bloody war involving hundreds of thousands of air, ground, and naval forces from many nations.
    [Show full text]
  • SAM-AT Project Development Plan for the Sustainability of Air Transport
    INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION SOUTH AMERICAN REGIONAL OFFICE SAM‐AT Project Development Plan for the Sustainability of Air Transport Growth in the South American Region Institutional Strengthening Module of the Aircraft Accident Investigation Authorities DRAFT Lima, March 2017 1 Contents Executive summary 3 Introduction 9 Model used for the study 11 Authorities of the South American Region studied 17 Analysis of the independence of the authorities studied 59 Conclusions 63 DRAFT 2 Executive Summary The States of the South American Region are signatories to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, signed in Chicago on December 7, 1944 (Chicago Convention), and are Contracting States of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), body responsible for implementing the provisions of the Convention. As signatories to the Chicago Convention, States have adopted a legal and regulatory framework in the field of civil aviation, based on the provisions of the Convention and in the international standards, recommended practices and procedures prescribed in its 19 Annexes. In that context the civil aviation authorities formulate, promulgate and oversee the implementation of at se of national rules governing civil aviation, air transport and aircraft accident investigation among other aeronautical activities in each State. In conformity with Article 26 of the Chicago Convention, it is incumbent on the State in which an aircraft accident occurs to institute an inquiry into the circumstances of the accident. This obligation can be met only when appropriate legislation on aircraft accident investigation is in place. Such legislation shall make provision for the establishment of an accident investigation authority (or commission, board or other body) for the investigation of aircraft accidents and incidents that is independent from State aviation authorities and other entities that could interfere with the conduct or objectivity of an investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Air & Space Power Journal
    Chief of Staff, US Air Force Gen John P. Jumper Commander, Air Education and Training Command Gen Donald G. Cook http://www.af.mil Commander, Air University Lt Gen John F. Regni Commandant, College of Aerospace Doctrine, Research and Education Col David S. Fadok Editor Lt Col Paul D. Berg Senior Editor Lt Col Malcolm D. Grimes http://www.aetc.randolph.af.mil Associate Editor Maj Donald R. Ferguson Editor and Military Defense Analyst Col Larry Carter, USAF, Retired Professional Staff Marvin W. Bassett, Contributing Editor Philip S. Adkins, Contributing Editor Debbie Banker, Editorial Assistant Sherry Terrell, Editorial Assistant Steven C. Garst, Director of Art and Production Daniel M. Armstrong, Illustrator http://www.au.af.mil L. Susan Fair, Illustrator Ann Bailey, Prepress Production Manager Air and Space Power Chronicles Luetwinder T. Eaves, Managing Editor The Air and Space Power Journal, published quarterly, is the professional flagship publication of the United States Air Force. It is designed to serve as an open forum for the presentation and stimulation of innova­ tive thinking on military doctrine, strategy, tactics, http://www.cadre.maxwell.af.mil force structure, readiness, and other matters of na­ tional defense. The views and opinions expressed or implied in the Journal are those of the authors and should not be construed as carrying the official sanc­ tion of the Department of Defense, Air Force, Air Education and Training Command, Air University, or other agencies or departments of the US government. Articles in this edition may be reproduced in whole or Visit Air and Space Power Journal online in part without permission.
    [Show full text]
  • We Wanted Wings: a History of the Aviation Cadet Program
    Cover illustration: “Aviation Cadets in Training – 1943” by Dottie Knight. (Courtesy, United States Air Force Art Collection) WE WANTED WINGS: A HISTORY OF THE AVIATION CADET PROGRAM Dr. Bruce A. Ashcroft Staff Historian HQ AETC/HO 2005 OFFICER CODE Duty well performed, Honor in all things, Country before self. AVIATION CADET HONOR CODE Article 1: An Aviation Cadet will not knowingly make any false statement, written or verbal, while acting in any capacity, official or otherwise, or in any situation reflecting on the Aviation Cadet Corps or the Air Force. Article 2: An Aviation Cadet will not take or receive the property of another person, or persons, under any conditions, without specific authority of that person or persons. Article 3: An Aviation Cadet will not impart or receive any unauthorized assistance, either outside or inside the classroom or places of instruction, which would tend to give any Aviation Cadet unfair advantage. Article 4: An Aviation Cadet will not quibble, use evasive statements, or technicalities in order to shield guilt or defeat the ends of justice. Article 5: An Aviation Cadet will report any violation of honor by another Aviation Cadet of which he is witness or has unquestionable knowledge. Article 6: An Aviation Cadet will not commit any act of intentional dishonesty which will reflect in any way on the honor and integrity of the Aviation Cadet Corps and the Air Force. Officer Code and Cadet Honor Code both from brochure, “Aviation Cadet Knowledge,” Preflight Training School, Lackland AFB TX, 1959. ii iii
    [Show full text]