Air & Space Power Journal

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Air & Space Power Journal Chief of Staff, US Air Force Gen John P. Jumper Commander, Air Education and Training Command Gen Donald G. Cook http://www.af.mil Commander, Air University Lt Gen John F. Regni Commandant, College of Aerospace Doctrine, Research and Education Col David S. Fadok Editor Lt Col Paul D. Berg Senior Editor Lt Col Malcolm D. Grimes http://www.aetc.randolph.af.mil Associate Editor Maj Donald R. Ferguson Editor and Military Defense Analyst Col Larry Carter, USAF, Retired Professional Staff Marvin W. Bassett, Contributing Editor Philip S. Adkins, Contributing Editor Debbie Banker, Editorial Assistant Sherry Terrell, Editorial Assistant Steven C. Garst, Director of Art and Production Daniel M. Armstrong, Illustrator http://www.au.af.mil L. Susan Fair, Illustrator Ann Bailey, Prepress Production Manager Air and Space Power Chronicles Luetwinder T. Eaves, Managing Editor The Air and Space Power Journal, published quarterly, is the professional flagship publication of the United States Air Force. It is designed to serve as an open forum for the presentation and stimulation of innova­ tive thinking on military doctrine, strategy, tactics, http://www.cadre.maxwell.af.mil force structure, readiness, and other matters of na­ tional defense. The views and opinions expressed or implied in the Journal are those of the authors and should not be construed as carrying the official sanc­ tion of the Department of Defense, Air Force, Air Education and Training Command, Air University, or other agencies or departments of the US government. Articles in this edition may be reproduced in whole or Visit Air and Space Power Journal online in part without permission. If they are reproduced, at http://www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil the Air and Space Power Journal requests a courtesy line. or e-mail to [email protected]. Summer 2005 Volume XIX, No. 2 AFRP 10-1 Senior Leader Perspective Lorenz on Leadership . 5 Maj Gen Stephen R. Lorenz, USAF Focus Area Expeditionary Air and Space Power . 14 Lt Col Paul D. Berg, USAF, Editor Features Beyond Blue Four: The Past and Future Transformation of Red Flag . 43 Maj Alexander Berger, USAF The View from the Tower of Babel: Air Force Foreign Language Posture for Global Engagement . 57 Col John L. Conway III, USAF, Retired Aggressive ISR in the War on Terrorism: Breaking the Cold War Paradigm . 73 Lt Col William B. Danskine, USAF Narrowing the Global-Strike Gap with an Airborne Aircraft Carrier . 85 Col George D. Kramlinger, USAF Departments Prelaunch Notes Quick-Looks and the Latest Chronicles Online Journal Articles . 10 Ricochets and Replies . 11 PIREPs Expeditionary Mobility Task Force: Projecting Combat Power . 15 Brig Gen Bobby J. Wilkes, USAF Col Murrell F. Stinnette, USAF Maj Randall Reed, USAF The Air Force Office of Special Investigations: Postured for the Future . 23 Christine E. Williamson Return of the Bomber Barons: The Resurgence of Long-Range Bombardment Aviation for the Early Twenty-first Century . 29 Maj Jeffrey W. Decker, USAF Vortices Train While You Fight: A New Mind-Set for Airpower Operations in Low-Intensity Conflict . 37 Lt Col Phil Haun, USAF Quick-Looks and NOTAMs Revised Air Force Doctrine Document 2-5, Information Operations . 36 Capt Randy Mize, USAF Stabilizing Critical Continuity of the Air and Space Expeditionary Force . 55 Douglas E. Lee Capt Joseph T. Morgan, USAF Contingency Response Group: Time to Expand the Box and Think “Coalition” . 70 Alexander M. Wathen Updated Air Force Publication: The U.S. Air Force Transformation Flight Plan, 2004 . 84 Mort Rolleston Book Reviews Neither War nor Not War: Army Command in Europe during the Time of Peace Operations: Tasks Confronting USAREUR Commanders, 1994–2000 . 99 Richard M. Swain Reviewer: Capt Gilles Van Nederveen, USAF, Retired Blitzkrieg to Desert Storm: The Evolution of Operational Warfare . 100 Robert M. Citino Reviewer: CSM James H. Clifford, USA Fallen Astronauts: Heroes Who Died Reaching for the Moon . 101 Colin Burgess and Kate Doolan, with Bert Vis Reviewer: Maj Michael P. Kleiman, USAFR Post-Soviet Military Theory and Strategy: A Discussion of the Russian Journal Military Thought . 102 Reviewer: LCDR Youssef Aboul-Enein, MSC, USN The Militarization and Weaponization of Space . 103 Matthew Mowthorpe Reviewer: 2d Lt Brent D. Ziarnick, USAF NATO’s Eastern Agenda in a New Strategic Era . 104 F. Stephen Larrabee Reviewer: Dr. John Albert Chinese Warfighting: The PLA Experience since 1949 . 105 Mark A. Ryan, David M. Finkelstein, and Michael A. McDevitt, eds. Reviewer: 2d Lt Daniel L. Magruder Jr., USAF America’s Role in Nation-Building: From Germany to Iraq . 106 James Dobbins et al. Reviewer: Dr. Lewis K. Griffith The Iraq War: Strategy, Tactics, and Military Lessons . 107 Anthony H. Cordesman Reviewer: Dr. Daniel J. Hughes Intelligence in War: Knowledge of the Enemy from Napoleon to Al-Qaeda . 109 John Keegan Reviewer: Maj Paul Johnston, Canadian Armed Forces Challenging Conventional Wisdom: Debunking the Myths and Exposing the Risks of Arms Export Reform . 110 Tamar Gabelnick and Rachel Stohl, eds. Reviewer: Lt Col Steven Payson, USAF The Papers of George Catlett Marshall, vol. 5, “The Finest Soldier,” January 1, 1945–January 7, 1947 . 111 Larry I. Bland and Sharon Ritenour Stevens, eds. Reviewer: Dr. Harold R. Winton “Oil for the Lamps of China”—Beijing’s 21st-Century Search for Energy . 113 Bernard D. Cole Reviewer: Paul Younes Commanding an Air Force Squadron in the Twenty-first Century: A Practical Guide of Tips and Techniques for Today’s Squadron Commander . 113 Lt Col Jeffry F. Smith Reviewer: Maj Kevin D. Smith, USAF The Fall of Hong Kong: Britain, China, and the Japanese Occupation . 114 Philip Snow Reviewer: Dr. Nicholas Evan Sarantakes Fighting the Breakout: The German Army in Normandy from COBRA to the Falaise Gap . 115 Rudolph Christoph Freiherr von Gersdorff et al. David C. Isby, ed. Reviewer: Dr. Robert B. Kane Africa’s Armies: From Honor to Infamy: A History from 1791 to the Present . 116 Robert B. Edgerton Reviewer: Col Bryant P. Shaw, PhD, USAF, Retired The American Foreign Legion: Black Soldiers of the 93d in World War I . 117 Frank E. Roberts Reviewer: Dr. Richard Bailey The Future Security Environment in the Middle East: Conflict, Stability, and Political Change . 118 Nora Bensahel and Daniel L. Byman, eds. Reviewer: Lt Col Kurt W. Schake, PhD, USAF Beginnings of the Cold War Arms Race: The Truman Administration and the U.S. Arms Build-Up . 119 Raymond P. Ojserkis Reviewer: Dr. Mark J. Conversino The Moral Warrior: Ethics and Service in the U.S. Military . 120 Martin L. Cook Reviewer: Dr. Christopher Toner The Iraq War . 122 John Keegan Reviewer: Lt Col James P. Gates, USAF Valkyrie: North American’s Mach 3 Superbomber . 123 Dennis R. Jenkins and Tony R. Landis Reviewer: Lt Col Dave Howard, USAF, Retired Raid on the Sun: Inside Israel’s Secret Campaign That Denied Saddam the Bomb . 124 Rodger W. Claire Reviewer: Maj J. Rick Rosales, USAF Mission Debrief . 125 Air and Space Power Journal Board of Reviewers Prof. Tami Davis Biddle Dr. Charles Krupnick US Army War College US Army War College Lt Col Price T. Bingham, USAF, Retired Dr. Benjamin S. Lambeth Melbourne, Florida RAND Dr. Kendall K. Brown Lt Col David MacIsaac, USAF, Retired NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Montgomery, Alabama Brig Gen Phillip D. Caine, USAF, Retired Dr. Karl P. Magyar Monument, Colorado Montgomery, Alabama Dr. Clayton K. S. Chun Col Edward Mann, USAF, Retired US Army War College Colorado Springs, Colorado Dr. Mark Clodfelter Dr. Jerome V. Martin National War College Command Historian Dr. James Corum Headquarters US Strategic Command USAF School of Advanced Air and Space Studies Col Phillip Meilinger, USAF, Retired Dr. Conrad Crane Northrop Grumman Corporation Director, US Army Military Studies Institute Prof. John H. Morrow Jr. Dr. Dik A. Daso University of Georgia National Air and Space Museum Dr. Daniel Mortensen Smithsonian Institution USAF College of Aerospace Doctrine, Research Dr. William L. Dowdy and Education Alabama State University Prof. James Mowbray Col Dennis M. Drew, USAF, Retired USAF Air War College USAF School of Advanced Air and Space Studies Dr. Karl Mueller Brig Gen Charles Dunlap Jr., USAF RAND Staff Judge Advocate Dr. Richard R. Muller USAF Air Combat Command USAF Air Command and Staff College Dr. Stephen Fought Col Robert Owen, USAF, Retired USAF Air War College Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Col David M. Glantz, USA, Retired Dr. Reina J. Pennington Journal of Slavic Military Studies Norwich University Col Thomas E. Griffith Jr., USAF USAF School of Advanced Air and Space Studies Lt Col Thomas R. Searle Headquarters US Special Operations Command Dr. John F. Guilmartin Jr. Ohio State University Dr. James Smith USAF Institute for National Security Studies Dr. Grant T. Hammond Center for Strategy and Technology Col James Spencer, USAF, Retired Air University USAF Academy Prof. Daniel Hughes Col Michael A. Stanley USAF Air War College USAF Air War College Dr. Thomas Hughes Col Richard Szafranski, USAF, Retired USAF School of Advanced Air and Space Studies Toffler Associates Col Mark P. Jelonek, USAF Dr. James Titus Commander, 614th Space Operations Group USAF Academy Director of Operations, Fourteenth Air Force Col Mark Wells, USAF Dr. Tom Keaney USAF Academy School of Advanced International Studies Johns Hopkins University Dr. Kenneth P. Werrell Christiansburg, Virginia Lt Col Merrick E. Krause Director, NDU Press Dr. Harold R. Winton Editor, Joint Force Quarterly USAF School of Advanced Air and Space Studies 4 APJ Lorenz on Leadership MAJ GEN STEPHEN R. LORENZ, USAF N 1987 I WAS commander of the 93rd this “scarcity principle” lies in accepting the Air Refueling Squadron at Castle AFB in reality of limited resources and becoming Merced, California. Late one night, I sat adept at obtaining superior results in less- down and wrote out a list of leadership than-ideal situations.
Recommended publications
  • Heritage, Heroes, Horizons 50 Years of A/TA Tradition and Transformation
    AIRLIFT/TANKER QUARTERLY Volume 26 • Number 4 • Fall 2018 Heritage, Heroes, Horizons 50 Years of A/TA Tradition and Transformation Pages 14 2018 A/TA Awards Pages 25-58 A Salute to Our Industry Partners Pages 60-69 Table of Contents 2018 A/TA Board of Offi cers & Convention Staff ..................................................................... 2 A/TA UpFront Chairman’s Comments. ............................................................................................................. 4 President’s Message .................................................................................................................... 5 Secretary’s Notes ........................................................................................................................ 6 AIRLIFT/TANKER QUARTERLY Volume 26 • Number 4 • Fall 2018 The Inexorable March of Time, an article by Col. Dennis “Bud” Traynor, USAF ret ...................7 ISSN 2578-4064 Airlift/Tanker Quarterly is published four times a year by the Features Airlift/Tanker Association, 7983 Rhodes Farm Way, Chattanooga, A Welcome Message from Air Mobility Command Commader General Maryanne Miller ...... 8 Tennessee 37421. Postage paid at St. Louis, Missouri. Subscription rate: $40.00 per year. Change of address A Welcome Message from Air Mobility Command Chief Master Sergeant Larry C. Williams, Jr... 10 requires four weeks notice. The Airlift/Tanker Association is a non-profi t professional Cover Story organization dedicated to providing a forum for people Heritage, Heores, Horizons interested
    [Show full text]
  • Coproduce Or Codevelop Military Aircraft? Analysis of Models Applicable to USAN* Brazilian Political Science Review, Vol
    Brazilian Political Science Review ISSN: 1981-3821 Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política Svartman, Eduardo Munhoz; Teixeira, Anderson Matos Coproduce or Codevelop Military Aircraft? Analysis of Models Applicable to USAN* Brazilian Political Science Review, vol. 12, no. 1, e0005, 2018 Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política DOI: 10.1590/1981-3821201800010005 Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=394357143004 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System Redalyc More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and Journal's webpage in redalyc.org Portugal Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative Coproduce or Codevelop Military Aircraft? Analysis of Models Applicable to USAN* Eduardo Munhoz Svartman Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil Anderson Matos Teixeira Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil The creation of the Union of South American Nations (USAN) aroused expectations about joint development and production of military aircraft in South America. However, political divergences, technological asymmetries and budgetary problems made projects canceled. Faced with the impasse, this article approaches features of two military aircraft development experiences and their links with the regionalization processes to extract elements that help to account for the problems faced by USAN. The processes of adoption of the F-104 and the Tornado in the 1950s and 1970s by countries that later joined the European Union are analyzed in a comparative perspective. The two projects are compared about the political and diplomatic implications (mutual trust, military capabilities and regionalization) and the economic implications (scale of production, value chains and industrial parks).
    [Show full text]
  • Global Military Helicopters 2015-16 Market Report Contents
    GLOBAL MILITARY HELICOPTERS 2015-16 MARKET REPORT CONTENTS MARKET OVERVIEW 2 MILITARY HELICOPTER KEY REQUIREMENTS 4 EUROPE 5 NORTH AMERICA 10 LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN 12 AFRICA 15 ASIA-PACIFIC 16 MIDDLE EAST 21 WORLD MILITARY HELICOPTER HOLDINGS 23 EUROPE 24 NORTH AMERICA 34 LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN 36 AFRICA 43 ASIA-PACIFIC 49 MIDDLE EAST 59 EVENT INFORMATION 65 Please note that all information herein is subject to change. Defence IQ endeavours to ensure accuracy wherever possible, but errors are often unavoidable. We encourage readers to contact us if they note any need for amendments or updates. We accept no responsibility for the use or application of this information. We suggest that readers contact the specific government and military programme offices if seeking to confirm the reliability of any data. 1 MARKET OVERVIEW Broadly speaking, the global helicopter market is currently facing a two- pronged assault. The military helicopter segment has been impacted significantly by continued defense budgetary pressures across most traditional markets, and a recent slide in global crude oil prices has impacted the demand for new civil helicopters as well as the level of activity for existing fleets engaged in the offshore oil & gas exploration sector. This situation has impacted industry OEMs significantly, many of which had been working towards strengthening the civil helicopter segment to partially offset the impact of budgetary cuts on the military segment. However, the medium- to long-term view of the market is promising given the presence of strong fundamentals and persistent, sustainable growth drivers. The market for military helicopters in particular is set to cross a technological threshold in the form of next-generation compound helicopters and tilt rotorcraft.
    [Show full text]
  • 1) ATQ Summer 2004
    CONTENTS… Association News Chairman’s Comments......................................................................... 2 President’s Message ............................................................................... 3 AIRLIFT TANKER QUARTERLY Volume 12 • Number 3 • Summer 2004 Secretary’s Notes ................................................................................... 3 Airlift/Tanker Quarterly is published four times a year by the Airlift/Tanker Association, Col. Barry F. Creighton, USAF (Ret.), Secretary, Association Round-Up .......................................................................... 4 1708 Cavelletti Court, Virginia Beach, VA 23454. (757) 838-3037. Postage paid at Belleville, Illinois. Subscription rate: $30.00 per year. Change of address requires four weeks notice. Cover Story The Airlift/Tanker Association is a non-profit professional organization dedicated to providing a forum for people interested in improving the AMC: 12 Years of Excellence ......................................................... 6-17 capability of U.S. air mobility forces. Membership in the Airlift/Tanker Association is $30 annually A New Era in American Air Power Began on 1 June 1992 or $85 for three years. Full-time student membership is $10 per year. Life membership is $400. Corporate membership includes five individual memberships and is $1200 per year. Membership dues include a subscription to Departments Airlift/Tanker Quarterly, and are subject to change. Airlift/Tanker Quarterly is published for the use of the officers,
    [Show full text]
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Nickel Grass: Airlift in Support of National Policy Capt Chris J
    Secretary of the Air Force Janies F. McGovern Air Force Chief of Staff Gen Larry D. Welch Commander, Air University Lt Gen Ralph Lv Havens Commander, Center for Aerospace Doctrine, Research, and Education Col Sidney J. Wise Editor Col Keith W. Geiger Associate Editor Maj Michael A. Kirtland Professional Staff Hugh Richardson. Contributing Editor Marvin W. Bassett. Contributing Editor John A. Westcott, Art Director and Production Mu linger Steven C. Garst. Art Editor and Illustrator The Airpower Journal, published quarterly, is the professional journal of the United States Air Force. It is designed to serve as an open forum for presenting and stimulating innovative thinking on military doctrine, strategy, tactics, force structure, readiness, and other national defense matters. The views and opinions ex- pressed or implied in the Journal are those of the authors and should not be construed as car- rying the official sanction of the Department of Defense, the Air Force, Air University, or other agencies or departments of the US government. Articles in this edition may be reproduced in whole or in part without permission. If repro- duced, the Airpower Journal requests a cour- tesy line. JOURNAL SPRING 1989. Vol. Ill, No. I AFRP 50 2 Editorial 2 Air Interdiction Col Clifford R. Kxieger, USAF 4 Operation Nickel Grass: Airlift in Support of National Policy Capt Chris J. Krisinger, USAF 16 Paradox of the Headless Horseman Lt Col Joe Boyles, USAF Capt Greg K. Mittelman, USAF 29 A Rare Feeling of Satisfaction Maj Michael A. Kirtland, USAF 34 Weaseling in the BUFF Col A. Lee Harrell, USAF 36 Thinking About Air Power Maj Andrew J.
    [Show full text]
  • BOOK REVIEWS the Air Force Way of War: US Tactics and Training After
    BOOK REVIEWS For military personnel who return from a mission and wonder “victims” of the day-to-day repercussions of operational stress about its impacts on them, La voie du retour will provide some injuries and that, in their own way, they too participate in the answers, de-stigmatize some of their reactions, and help them operational missions. As I have said before, the men and women make connections between their mental health and their work in who deploy on missions receive medals when they return, and so the military. It might even lead them to consult a mental health should their families. Had more space been devoted to the issues professional. Having worked in the Canadian Armed Forces, and challenges faced by family members, it would have added I am well aware that mental health is still a taboo topic in the to the book’s value. CAF today. This book offers information and raises awareness on the subject. It will help readers understand that it is possible to In conclusion, I encourage all brothers and sisters in arms have “normal” mental and behavioural reactions to “abnormal” and all veterans who are wondering about their personal state, events in life. Military operations are generally carried out in their emotional or behavioural reactions or their mental health to settings where personnel are likely to be exposed to potentially obtain a copy of La voie du retour, read it attentively, and complete traumatic events. the activities and exercises it suggests. Doing so could enhance their personal growth and shed light on the connections between The book deals with a multitude of topics directly related to their mental and emotional state and their military mission in a operational stress injuries and operational missions.
    [Show full text]
  • Intellipedia-Mothership.Pdf
    This document is made available through the declassification efforts and research of John Greenewald, Jr., creator of: The Black Vault The Black Vault is the largest online Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) document clearinghouse in the world. The research efforts here are responsible for the declassification of MILLIONS of pages released by the U.S. Government & Military. Discover the Truth at: http://www.theblackvault.com Mother ship - lntellipedia Doc,lD: 6637158 (U) Mother ship UNCLASSIFIED From Intellipedia I (b) (3) - P . L . 86- 36 1 You have new messages (last change). See the Wikipe~ia article A mother ship is a vessel or aircraft that carries a smaller vessel or Mother ship · aircraft that operates independently from it. Examples include bombers converted to carry experimental aircraft to altitudes where they can conduct their research (such as the B-52 carrying the X-15), or ships that carry small submarines to an area of ocean to be explored (such as the Atlantis II carrying the Alvin). The mothership may also recover the smaller craft, or may go its own way after releasing it. I Contents • 1 Usage I • 2 In science fiction and UFOs • 3 See also I L.•___ 4 References ___; Usage The term mother ship dates back to the nineteenth century whaling trade when small, fast ships were used to chase and kill whales. The dead meat from several boats was then brought back to the larger, slower ship for processing and storage until the return to land. This model enabled a far more efficient method of whaling.
    [Show full text]
  • Mp-Msg-035-12
    Evaluating the Impacts of Mission Training via Distributed Simulation on Live Exercise Performance: Results from the US/UK “Red Skies” Study Ebb Smith Heather McIntyre Bedford Technology Park Bedford Technology Park Thurleigh, Beds, MK44 2FQ Thurleigh, Beds, MK44 2FQ United Kingdom United Kingdom [email protected] [email protected] Sara Elizabeth Gehr Margaret Schurig 6030 S. Kent St. 6030 S. Kent St. Mesa, AZ 85212 Mesa, AZ 85212 United States United States [email protected] [email protected] Steve Symons Brian Schreiber 6030 S. Kent St. 6030 S. Kent St. Mesa, AZ 85212 Mesa, AZ 85212 United States United States [email protected] [email protected] Winston Bennett, Jr. 6030 S. Kent St. Mesa, AZ 85212 United States [email protected] ABSTRACT Over the past several years, the UK Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (DSTL) and the US Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) have been involved in research to develop training and assessment methods for use in mission training via distributed simulation. As part of our efforts, we have developed competency-based training and rehearsal scenarios and data collection instrumentation for routinely delivering and assessing distributed training events. Our most recent collaborative study, named “Red Skies,” involved extending our work to include field assessments of the training benefits derived from involvement in a simulation–based distributed mission training event and subsequent live flying at a Coalition Smith, E.; McIntyre, H.; Gehr, S.E.; Schurig, M.; Symons, S.; Schreiber, B.; Bennett Jr., W.
    [Show full text]
  • Dogfight History
    Dogfight A dogfight or dog fight is a common term used to describe close-range aerial combat between military aircraft. The term originated during World War I, and probably derives from the preferred fighter tactic of positioning one's aircraft behind the enemy aircraft. From this position, a pilot could fire his guns on the enemy without having to lead the target, and the enemy aircraft could not effectively fire back. The term came into existence because two women fighting is called a catfight, and all early fighter pilots were men, hence dogfight. This subsequently obtained its revised folk etymology about two dogs chasing each other's tails.[citation needed] Modern terminology for aerial combat between aircraft is air-to-air combat and air combat maneuvering, or ACM. F-22 Raptors over Utah in their first official deployment, Oct. 2005, simulating a dogfight. History World War I Dogfighting emerged in World War I. Aircraft were initially used as mobile observation vehicles and early pilots gave little thought to aerial combat—enemy pilots at first simply exchanged waves. Intrepid pilots decided to interfere with enemy reconnaissance by improvised means, including throwing bricks, grenades and sometimes rope, which they hoped would entangle the enemy plane's propeller. This progressed to pilots firing hand-held guns at enemy planes. Once machine guns were mounted to the plane, either in a turret or higher on the wings of early biplanes, the era of air combat began. The Germans acquired an early air superiority due to the invention of synchronization gear in 1915. During the first part of the war there was no established tactical doctrine for air-to-air combat.
    [Show full text]
  • A-Cr-Ccp-803/Pf-001 Chapter 11 Po 320
    A-CR-CCP-803/PF-001 CHAPTER 11 PO 320 – PARTICIPATE IN CANADIAN FORCES (CF) FAMILIARIZATION ACTIVITIES A-CR-CCP-803/PF-001 ROYAL CANADIAN AIR CADETS PROFICIENCY LEVEL THREE INSTRUCTIONAL GUIDE SECTION 1 EO M320.01 – DESCRIBE THE ROLE OF CANADA’S AIR FORCE Total Time: 30 min PREPARATION PRE-LESSON INSTRUCTIONS Resources needed for the delivery of this lesson are listed in the lesson specification located in A-CR-CCP- 803/PG-001, Chapter 4. Specific uses for said resources are identified throughout the instructional guide within the TP for which they are required. Review the lesson content and become familiar with the material prior to delivering the lesson. Update the information sheets located at Annexes A to D using the reference. Photocopy the updated information sheets, ensuring there is one copy at the learning stations for each cadet in the largest group. Photocopy the worksheet located at Annex E for each cadet in the class. PRE-LESSON ASSIGNMENT N/A. APPROACH An in-class activity was chosen for TP 1 as it is an interactive way to present the role of Canada’s air force and stimulate interest among cadets. A group discussion was chosen for TP 2 as it allows the cadets to interact with their peers and share their knowledge, experiences, opinions, and feelings about Canada’s air force. INTRODUCTION REVIEW N/A. OBJECTIVES By the end of this lesson the cadet shall have described the role of Canada’s air force. IMPORTANCE It is important for cadets to know the role of Canada’s air force.
    [Show full text]
  • The Coastwatcher Publication of the Thames River Composite Squadron Connecticut Wing Civil Air Patrol
    Missions for America Weather stripping will be installed as needed on Semper vigilans! doors. Semper volans! A security light will be installed on the exterior of the north end of the Cadet trailer. ANNUAL FUNDRAISER The Coastwatcher Publication of the Thames River Composite Squadron Connecticut Wing Civil Air Patrol 300 Tower Rd., Groton, CT http://ct075.org . LtCol Stephen Rocketto, Editor [email protected] C/MSgt Virginia Poe, Reporter C/SrA Michael Hollingsworth, Printer's Devil Lt David Meers & Maj Roy Bourque, Papparazis The Squadron's annual raiser has started. Vol. VIII, No. 36 07 October, 2014 Squadron members who have not received their sales packets should contact LtCol Rocketto. SCHEDULE OF COMING EVENT Squadron expenses are about $6,000 each year. 11 OCT-Squadron Maintenance Day We raise $1400 from senior member dues, $600 14 OCT-TRCS Meeting from contributions and grants, and $4,000 from 17-19 OCT-CTWG/NER Conference our fruit sale. This money pays for our electricity, 16-18 OCT-NER AEO Course at Conference telephone, maintenance, equipment and supplies, 21 OCT-TRCS Meeting and van fuel. 18-25 OCT-NER Staff College-New Jersey 28 OCT-TRCS Meeting Last year only half of our Squadron members took part and 50% of the fruit was sold by 15% of our 01 NOV-CTWG SAREX members. This is lamentable. There is a 08-09 NOV-SLS Course-Meriden possibility that Squadron dues for Officers will be raised and dues for Cadets will be implemented if SQUADRON MAINTENANCE DAY we cannot raise sufficient funds. A Squadron maintenance day is scheduled for The fruit we sell is a first class product.
    [Show full text]