DOCSLIB.ORG

THE FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC of ETHIOPIA MINISTRY of AGRICULTURE (Moa)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC of ETHIOPIA MINISTRY of AGRICULTURE (Moa) Public Disclosure Authorized THE FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF ETHIOPIA MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE (MoA) Public Disclosure Authorized Ethiopia Emergency Locust Response Project (EELRP) Integrated Pest Management Plan (IPMP) Public Disclosure Authorized October 2020 ADDIS ABABA Public Disclosure Authorized Acronyms BoA Bureau of Agriculture Das Development Agents DL Desert Locust DLC Desert Locust Control DLCO-EA Desert Locust Control Office- East Africa EELRP Ethiopia Emergency Locust Response Project EFCCC Environment Forest and Climate Change Commission EHSGs Environment, Health and Safety Guidelines EMPRES Emergency Prevention System for Transboundary Animal and Plant EMPRES Transboundary Animal and Plant Pests and Diseases ESF Environmental and Social Framework of the WB ESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework ESSs Environmental and Social Standards GAP Good Agricultural Practice GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism IPM Integrated Pest Management IPMP Integrated Pest Management Plan MoA Ministry of Agriculture MoA Ministry of Agriculture MoH Ministry of Health MoLSA Ministry of Labour and Social Affair PIM Project Implementation Manual PMP Pest Management Plan SA Social Assessment SEP Stakeholders Engagement Plan UN FAO United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization WB The World Bank 1 Table of Contents Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1. Past Ethiopia’s Locust Infestation and Control Situations ............................................................... 18 1.2. Recent Desert Locust situation and Control Efforts ........................................................................ 19 Section 2. Background on the preparation of IPMP ................................................................................... 19 2.1. Scale of IPMP development and implementation .......................................................................... 20 2.2. Aims and objectives of the Pest Management Plan Study .............................................................. 20 2.2.1. Specific objectives of the IPMP ................................................................................................. 20 2.2.2. Action Areas .............................................................................................................................. 20 2.3. Pest Management Approaches ........................................................................................................ 21 2.3.1. Conventional Approach ............................................................................................................ 21 2.3.2. Integrated Pest Management ................................................................................................... 22 2.3.3. Methods and approaches of the study ..................................................................................... 25 Section 3. Stakeholder Engagement and Information Disclosure .............................................................. 26 3.1. Stakeholder Consultation and Disclosure of PMP ........................................................................... 26 3.2. Grievance Redress Mechanism ........................................................................................................ 26 3.3. Summary of stakeholder consultation of the PMP .......................................................................... 27 Section 4. Project Description ..................................................................................................................... 28 4.1. Project Objectives and Scope........................................................................................................... 28 4.1.1. Project Components ................................................................................................................. 28 4.1.2. Major Activities of the Project .................................................................................................. 29 4.1.3. Project Result Framework ......................................................................................................... 30 4.2. General Description of the Project sites .......................................................................................... 30 4.2.1. Desert Locust Breeding areas and Seasons .............................................................................. 31 4.2.2. Aerial Bases, Clusters and Sub-clusters areas functional coordinating units ........................... 32 4.2.3. Pesticide Store areas ................................................................................................................. 32 4.3. Baseline Condition of the Project Area ............................................................................................ 32 4.3.1. Project Areas Agro-ecological Features .................................................................................... 32 4.3.2. Ecological Feature and Land use of the project area ................................................................ 33 Section 5. Pest Management Related Policy, Legal and Institutional Framework ..................................... 34 5.1. Policies and Legal Framework .......................................................................................................... 34 2 5.1.1. National Policies, Strategies and Legal Framework .................................................................. 34 5.1.2. Relevant and Applicable International Requirements and Conventions .................................. 35 5.2. Institutional Framework................................................................................................................... 38 Section 6. Environmental and Social Risks and Mitigation Measures ........................................................ 39 6.1. Environmental and social Impacts of the Project ............................................................................ 39 6.1.1. Potential Positive Impact of the Project ................................................................................... 39 6.1.2. Potential Negative Impacts and Risks of the Project ................................................................ 40 6.2. Proposed mitigation measures as specified in the EELRP’s ............................................................. 42 6.3. Short Guidance for Workers in Key Areas........................................................................................ 51 Section 7. Ethiopia Emergency Locust Response Project IPMP .................................................................. 53 7.1. IPMP for EELRP focusing on the hot spot DL infestation Woredas of regions ................................ 53 7.2. Monitoring, Inspection and reporting arrangements for the IPMP ................................................ 61 7.2.1. Monitoring ................................................................................................................................ 61 7.2.2. Reporting ................................................................................................................................... 67 Section 8. Training and Capacity Building ................................................................................................... 68 8.1. Capacity Building on Training and Research .................................................................................... 68 8.2. Institutional Arrangements and Capacity Building .......................................................................... 69 Section 9. Summary of the Proposed Budget ............................................................................................ 70 Section 10. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 71 11. References ............................................................................................................................................ 73 12. Annexes ................................................................................................................................................. 74 Annex 1. Characterization of agro-ecological zones DL hot spot woredas, DL lifecycle season, and non pesticide techniques applying ................................................................................................................. 74 Annex 2. The Current Desert Locust control operation aerial bases, clusters and sub-clusters coordinating experts deployment .......................................................................................................... 76 Annex 3. Regions and Respective Woredas IPMP of Ethiopian Emergency Locust Response Project and List of Regions and total woredas/districts............................................................................................. 77 Annex 4. Questions Related to Environmental Issues for KII (Federal Levels Stakeholders) ................. 83 Annex 5. Questions Related to Environmental Issues for KII (Regional and Woreda Levels Stakeholders) .......................................................................................................................................... 88 Annex 6: Possible Insecticides for Management of Desert Locust ........................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Districts of Ethiopia
    Region District or Woredas Zone Remarks Afar Region Argobba Special Woreda -- Independent district/woredas Afar Region Afambo Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Asayita Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Chifra Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Dubti Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Elidar Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Kori Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Mille Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Abala Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Afdera Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Berhale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Dallol Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Erebti Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Koneba Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Megale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Amibara Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Awash Fentale Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Bure Mudaytu Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Dulecha Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Gewane Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Aura Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Ewa Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Gulina Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Teru Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Yalo Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Dalifage (formerly known as Artuma) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Dewe Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Hadele Ele (formerly known as Fursi) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Simurobi Gele'alo Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Telalak Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Amhara Region Achefer -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Angolalla Terana Asagirt -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Artuma Fursina Jile -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Banja -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Belessa --
    [Show full text]
  • Spatio-Temporal Trends and Variability of Temperature Over Bale Zone, Ethiopia
    International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE) ISSN: 2278-3075, Volume-9 Issue-2, December 2019 Spatio-Temporal Trends and Variability of Temperature Over Bale Zone, Ethiopia Dereje Tolosa Moti, Fitsum Tilahun Teshome, Hosaena Mesfin G/tsadik Abstract: Understanding of temperature trends and their These are helpful to understanding and predicting weather spatiotemporal variability has great significances on making deep and climate changes. According to recent report released by insight for planners, managers, professionals and decision Intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC), the makers of water resources and agriculture. Therefore, this earth’s temperature has increased by 0.74° C between 1906 research was set with aim to analyze spatiotemporal variability of and 2005 [1]. There is also a global trend for increased temperature and their time series trends over Bale Zone. Statistical analysis: Parametric test with regression analysis on occurrence of droughts, as well as heavy rainfall events over the anomalies like deviation from mean and Non-parametric test the world. Cold days, cold nights and frost have become less with Mann-Kendall test together with Sen’s Slope Estimator & Zs common, while hot days, hot nights and heat waves have statistics has been used for estimation of trends of a historical data become more frequent. The IPCC has predicted that the series of monthly, seasonal and annually maximum and temperature rise by the end of this century is likely to be in the minimum temperature of selected meteorological stations in Bale range 1.5 to 4.0 °C. It is also likely that in future tropical Zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Communal Irrigation Scheme Management System, in the Case of Agarfa Woreda, Bale Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia
    International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 8, Issue 5, May 2018 392 ISSN 2250-3153 Assessment of Communal Irrigation Scheme Management System, In the case of Agarfa Woreda, Bale Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia Abdissa Abe Neme (M.Sc) Madda Walabu University, Department of Rural Development and Agricultural Extension, Bale Robe, 247, Ethiopia DOI: 10.29322/IJSRP.8.5.2018.p7750 http://dx.doi.org/10.29322/IJSRP.8.5.2018.p7750 Abstract- The study was conducted in Agarfa district, Oromia been practice for long at different farm levels, there is no regional state Ethiopia. A total of 120 farmers were selected in efficient and well-managed irrigation water practice (Mihret and the study area. The x^2and t-test were used to analyse the Ermias , 2014) However, the loss of excessive water (amount of independent dummy and continuous variables respectively. water for irrigation use), lack of awareness of water users, Generally, farmers have showed favorable response in absences of the trial site in locality for irrigation utilization and participating in the community managed irrigation scheme lack of new technology utilization are the great constraints which utilization and management system. Binary logit model was hinder the improvement of rural farmer’s households to increase applied to analyse the factors affecting farmers' participation in income generation and food security (FAO, 2005). communal irrigation management system. The findings of this In order to attain sustainable agricultural production from study indicate that any effort in promoting communal irrigation irrigation, it is important to managed and utilize the resources scheme management system should recognize the socio- like land , water and others in good manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Hum Ethio Manitar Opia Rian Re Espons E Fund D
    Hum anitarian Response Fund Ethiopia OCHA, 2011 OCHA, 2011 Annual Report 2011 Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011 Table of Contents Note from the Humanitarian Coordinator ................................................................................................ 2 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................. 3 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 2011 Humanitarian Context ........................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Map - 2011 HRF Supported Projects ............................................................................................. 6 2. Information on Contributors ................................................................................................................ 7 2.1 Donor Contributions to HRF .......................................................................................................... 7 3. Fund Overview .................................................................................................................................... 8 3.1 Summary of HRF Allocations in 2011 ............................................................................................ 8 3.1.1 HRF Allocation by Sector .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DTM Event Tracking Tool 30 (18-24 July 2020)
    DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX-ETHIOPIA EVENT TRACKING TOOL (ETT) The DTM Event Tracking Tool (ETT) is deployed to track and provide up to date information on sudden displacements and other population movements ETT Report: No. 30 | 18 - 24 July 2020 CoVID-19 Situation Update ERITREA RED SEA YEMEN Wegde Kelela MOVEMENTS WembermaWest Gojam AFAR Gablalu TIGRAY Jama Zone 5 Oromia Hadhagala Ayisha KemashiSUDAN SOMALIA 364,322 12,693 200 5,785 East Gojam Gewane AFAR DJIBOUTI AMHARA GULF OF ADEN AmuruAMHARA Zone 3 Siti Tested Confirmed Deaths Recovered BENISHANGUL GUMUZ Shinile 7,876 IDPs North Shewa Dembel ADDIS ABABA Source: Ministry of Health, 24 July 2020 HARARI North Shewa 180 Kuyu DIRE DAWA GAMBELA Horo Gudru Wellega Amibara 66 Chinaksen OROMIA Jarso Main Highlights SOMALI Dulecha Miesso SNNPR Kombolcha KemashiSOUTH Gursum SUDAN Cobi Sululta Haro Maya Conict (4,202 IDPs) 3,102 Mieso 136 During the reporting period, 3,546 new cases were recorded, which is SOMALIA KENYA West Shewa UGANDA ADDIS ABABA 139 Girawa Fedis Fafan a 146% increase from the previous week. The breakdown by region is East Wellega Babile 162 Ilu Fentale East Hararge listed below. Dawo West Hararge Flash Floods 410 Boset 20 Boke Kuni Nono Merti Addis Ababa continued to record a high number of cases (3,674 IDPs) South West Shewa East Shewa Jeju Buno Bedele Sire within the reporting week with 2,447 new cases while Hawi Gudina Jarar Guraghe Fik Kumbi Degehamedo Oromia recorded 289 new cases, Tigray 236, Gambela 170, PRIORITY NEEDS Silti Sude Jimma Arsi Amigna Lege Hida Erer Yahob Afar 74, Benishangul Gumuz 73, Amhara 68, Dire Dawa 52, Yem Siltie OROMIA Gibe Seru Hamero Somali 47, SNNPR 39, Sidama 31, and Harari 20 new Hadiya Shirka Sagag 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Ethiopian Fact Sheet April 2017
    VICTORIA FALLS Ethiopian Airlines Factsheet - April 2017 OSLO ANTANANARIVO Overview Ethiopian Airlines (Ethiopian) is the leading and most profitable airline in Africa. In 2014 IATA ranked Ethiopian as the largest airline in Africa in revenue and profit. Over the past seven decades, Ethiopian has been a pioneer of African aviation as an aircraft technology leader. It all started with a military surplus C-47, leading the way with the first Jet service in the continent in the early 60’s to the first B-767 in the mid 80’s, to the first African B-787 Dreamliner in 2012 and the first African Airbus A-350 in 2016. Ethiopian joined Star Alliance, the world’s largest Airline network, in December 2011. Ethiopian is currently implementing a 15-year strategic plan called Vision 2025 that will see it become the leading airline group in Africa with seven strategic business units. Ethiopian is a multi-award winning airline, including SKYTRAX and Passenger Choice Awards in 2015, and has been registering an average growth of 25% per annum for the past ten years. Ethiopian Background Information Founded E December 21, 1945 Starting date of operation E April 08, 1946 Ownership E Government of Ethiopia (100%) Head Office E Bole International Airport, P.O. Box 1755 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Fax: (+ 251)11661 1474 Reservations E Tel: (+251) 11 665 6666 Website E http://www.ethiopianairlines.com Group Chief Executive Officer E Mr. Tewolde GebreMariam Fleet Summary Aircraft Inventory: 87 Fleet on order: 47 Average age of aircraft: 5 years Passenger aircraft Airbus
    [Show full text]
  • Livestock and Livestock Systems in the Bale Mountains Ecoregion
    LIVESTOCK AND LIVESTOCK SYSTEMS IN THE BALE MOUNTAINS ECOREGION Fiona Flintan, Worku Chibsa, Dida Wako and Andrew Ridgewell A report for the Bale EcoRegion Sustainable Management Project, SOS Sahel Ethiopia and FARM Africa June 2008 Addis Ababa Photo: A respondent mapping grazing routes in Bale Mountains EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Livestock has been an integral part of the Bale landscape for many centuries. Until relatively recently the livestock system was extensive with small numbers of people and livestock moving in a free and mobile manner. However since the time of Haile Selassie there have been numerous influencing factors that have changed the face of livestock production in Bale. This began with the introduction of land measurement and taxes which encouraged settled agricultural expansion, aggravated by the declaration of grazing lands as ‘no-man’s lands’. At the same time large scale mechanised farms were established in the lower areas, forcing livestock producers into the higher altitude regions. More recently villagisation and resettlement programmes have promoted settlement and an increased population. However, the largest single ‘loss’ of pastoral resources occurred with the establishment of the Bale Mountains National Park (BMNP) in 1970 encompassing an area of 2400km2. This was created without the consent or even the knowledge of local resource users. The historical development of BMNP has been aimed principally, albeit intermittently, at preserving the environment as a ‘wilderness’ area by excluding habitation and customary natural resource management practices. During the former Dergue regime (1974-1991) state authority over the Park was at its strongest resulting in the forced removal of settlements and the effective colonisation of the mountain landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • ETHIOPIA Humanitarian Access Situation Report June – July 2019
    ETHIOPIA Humanitarian Access Situation Report June – July 2019 This report is produced by OCHA Ethiopia in collaboration with humanitarian partners. It covers the period June - July 2019. The next report will be issued around September - October 2019. OVERVIEW IUS • In June - July, Ethiopia experienced an at- TIGRAY 276 Access incidents reported tempted government overthrow in Amhara, Western socio-political unrest in Sidama (SNNPR), North Gondar Wag Hamra Central Gondar and a rise in security incidents in Southwest- Zone 4 (Fantana Rasu) AFAR ern Oromia and Gambella. The quality of ac- Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) cess declined, limiting assistance to people AMHARA No. o incidents by one South Wello Metekel in need, against a backdrop of massive gov- Oromia East Gojam BENISHANGUL Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) 4 13 35 49 AsosaGUMUZ Siti ernment-led returns of IDP to areas of origin. Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) North Shewa(O) North Shewa(A) Kemashi Dire Dawa urban West Wellega East Wellega DIRE DAWA West Shewa Fafan • Hostilities between Ethiopian Defense Forc- ADDIS ABABA Kelem Wellega East Hararge Finfine Special West Hararge es (EDF) and Unidentified Armed Groups Buno Bedele East Shewa Etang Special Ilu Aba Bora Jarar OROMIA Erer (UAGs) as well as inter-ethnic, remained the GAMBELA Jimma Agnewak main access obstacle, with 197 incidents Doolo Nogob West Arsi SOMALI (out of 276), mostly in Southwestern Oromia SNNP Sidama Bale Korahe (110). The Wellegas, West Guji (Oromia), and Gedeo Shabelle Gambella, were the most insecure areas for Segen Area P. West Guji Guji aid workers. Liban Borena • In June, conflict in the Wellegas scaled up, Daawa with explosive devices attacks causing ci- Source: Access Incidents database vilian casualties in urban centres.
    [Show full text]
  • Agency Deyr/Karan 2012 Seasonal
    Food Supply Prospects FOR THE YEAR 2013 ______________________________________________________________________________ Disaster Risk Management and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS) Ministry of Agriculture (MoA) March 2013 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Table of Contents Glossary ................................................................................................................. 2 Acronyms ............................................................................................................... 3 EXCUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................. 4 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................... 11 REGIONAL SUMMARY OF FOOD SUPPLY PROSPECT ............................................. 14 SOMALI ............................................................................................................. 14 OROMIA ........................................................................................................... 21 TIGRAY .............................................................................................................. 27 AMHARA ........................................................................................................... 31 AFAR ................................................................................................................. 34 BENISHANGUL GUMUZ ..................................................................................... 37 SNNP ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Prioritization of Shelter/NFI Needs
    Prioritization of Shelter/NFI needs Date: 31st May 2018 Shelter and NFI Needs As of 18 May 2018, the overall number of displaced people is 345,000 households. This figure is based on DTM round 10, partner’s assessments, government requests, as well as the total of HH supported since July 2017. The S/NFI updated its prioritisation in early May and SNFI Cluster partners agreed on several criteria to guide prioritisation which include: - 1) type of emergency, 2) duration of displacement, and 3) sub-standard shelter conditions including IDPS hosted in collective centres and open-air sites and 4) % of vulnerable HH at IDP sites. Thresholds for the criteria were also agreed and in the subsequent analysis the cluster identified 193 IDP hosting woredas mostly in Oromia and Somali regions, as well as Tigray, Gambella and Addis Ababa municipality. A total of 261,830 HH are in need of urgent shelter and NFI assistance. At present the Cluster has a total of 57,000 kits in stocks and pipeline. The Cluster requires urgent funding to address the needs of 204,830 HHs that are living in desperate displacement conditions across the country. This caseload is predicted to increase as the flooding continues in the coming months. Shelter and NFI Priority Activities In terms of priority activities, the SNFI Cluster is in need of ES/NFI support for 140,259 HH displaced mainly due to flood and conflict under Pillar 2, primarily in Oromia and Somali Regions. In addition, the Shelter and NFI Cluster requires immediate funding for recovery activities to support 14,000 HH (8,000 rebuild and 6,000 repair) with transitional shelter support and shelter repair activities under Pillar 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Federalism and Autonomy Conflicts in the Somali Region 135
    Federalism and ethnic conflict in Ethiopia. A comparative study of the Somali and Benishangul-Gumuz regions Adegehe, A.K. Citation Adegehe, A. K. (2009, June 11). Federalism and ethnic conflict in Ethiopia. A comparative study of the Somali and Benishangul-Gumuz regions. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/13839 Version: Not Applicable (or Unknown) Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the License: Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/13839 Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable). Federalism and Autonomy 6 Conflicts in the Somali Region 6.1 Introduction The preceding chapter gave a general background to the history and ethnic makeup of the study regions. In contrast, this chapter presents the impact of federal restructuring on intra and inter-clan relationships in the newly constituted Somali region. In fact, some of the theoretical propositions about the role of federalism in decentralising conflicts through ‘proliferation of points of power,’ outlined in chapter 2 appear to have been worked in the SNRS. In other words, federal restructuring by making resources such as political appointments, civil service jobs, regional/local budget and others available at local and regional levels impelled both intra and inter-clan contestations that often lead into violence. The division that emerged between the dominant Ogaden and the non-Ogadeni clans in the wake of ethnic regionalisation appeared to reduce possible threats from the Somali region to the political centre. However, inter-clan autonomy conflicts in the region are typically violent and localised.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Knowledge on Medicinal Plants Used in and Around Robe Town, Bale Zone, Oromia Region, Southeast Ethiopia
    Vol. 12(16), pp. 194-202, 25 May, 2018 DOI: 10.5897/JMPR2017.6445 Article Number: D9C96A857205 ISSN: 1996-0875 Copyright©2018 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article Journal of Medicinal Plants Research http://www.academicjournals.org/JMPR Full Length Research Paper Indigenous knowledge on medicinal plants used in and around Robe Town, Bale Zone, Oromia Region, Southeast Ethiopia Abadi Birhanu1 and Shimels Ayalew2* 1Department of Biology, Adigrat University, Adigrat, Ethiopia. 2Department of Biology, Dire Dawa University, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia. Received 6 July, 2017; Accepted 14 November, 2017 A study on medicinally important plants in and around Robe town, Southwest Ethiopia was been carried out to document the medicinal plants and the associated knowledge in the area. Thirty informants with age range between 18 and 70 years took part in this study. Semi-structured interview was used to collect the data from the informants. The collected data was then analyzed using micro-soft excel spread sheet 2007 and summarized by descriptive statistical methods. Fifty five medicinally important plants were documented from the study area. The medicinal plants comprised of 33 families and 49 genera. Fabaceae was 30.4% followed by Solanaceae (21.7%) dominatedthe family distribution. Herbs are the most harvested (45.4%) plant habits followed by shrubs (30.9%) and trees (21.8%). Leaves are the most (52.7%) important plant parts used for medicinal value. Oral (47.3%) is the most common administration method used by the local people of the area. Crushing dominates (60%) the preparation method of the medicine. The practice on the use of traditional medicine is commonin the study area.
    [Show full text]