Hum anitarian Response Fund Ethiopia

OCHA, 2011 OCHA, 2011

Annual Report 2011 Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Table of Contents

Note from the Humanitarian Coordinator ...... 2 Acknowledgements ...... 3 1. Executive Summary ...... 4 1.1 2011 Humanitarian Context ...... 4 1.2 Map - 2011 HRF Supported Projects ...... 6 2. Information on Contributors ...... 7 2.1 Donor Contributions to HRF ...... 7 3. Fund Overview ...... 8 3.1 Summary of HRF Allocations in 2011 ...... 8 3.1.1 HRF Allocation by Sector ...... 8 3.1.2 HRF Allocation by Region ...... 9 3.1.3 HRF Allocation (by type of Agency and number of projects) ...... 9 3.1.4 Acceptance versus rejection rate ...... 10 3.1.5 HRF Contributions towards the Humanitarian Requirements Document (HRD) ...... 10 3.2 Results of HRF Projects per Cluster / Sector ...... 11 3.2.1 Nutrition Sector ...... 13 3.2.2 WASH Sector ...... 16 3.2.3 Agriculture Sector ...... 17 3.2.4 Protection ...... 18 3.2.5 NFI Sector ...... 19 3.2.6 Common Services ...... 19 3.2.7 Refugee Sector ...... 20 4. Summary and analysis of achievements ...... 24 4.1 HRF Innovations and Developments in 2011 ...... 24 4.2 HRF and Humanitarian Reform ...... 26 5. Project Monitoring ...... 29 6. Gender Consideration ...... 32 7. Conclusion, challenges & way forward ...... 34 Glossary/Acronyms ...... 35 Annexes: ...... 36

1

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Note from the Humanitarian Coordinator

2

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Acknowledgements

The Government of Ethiopia: numerous applications we receive for funding. The Appreciation goes to the Government of Ethiopia for cluster leads have been instrumental in taking the lead on their unreserved support of the HRF. It is because of such diligently reviewing and compiling the comments and collaborative effort that the HRF met its major objectives recommendations made by their review group members of ensuring timely and appropriate funding for life- and ensuring the applicants’ follow through and saving projects by partner agencies, and subsequently improvement of applications. Our appreciation also supporting the pillars of the Humanitarian Reform extends to agencies that managed supply pipelines (CSB Process. and RUTF) which were critical in ensuring minimum preparedness and rapid humanitarian response. Donors: Thanks go tothe HRF donorsfor generously giving to Implementing Partners: life-saving emergency responses in line with the The role of the HRF is to support humanitarian response; principles of Good Humanitarian Donorship. During the the success or failure of the HRF is determined by the year, the government of the United Kingdomwas the impact that the resources it manageshave in delivering biggest contributor to the HRF, donating 42 per cent of timely and appropriate humanitarian response. Thus the total funds received for the year, followed by most important work is that of our implementing contributions from the governments of the Netherlands, partners. Reviews and evaluations have consistently Sweden and Denmark at 16per cent, 14per cent and noted how well they have performed. 13per cent respectively. Recognition is also extended for the donations received from Norway, Ireland, Italy, Members of the HRF,also appreciated that our partners Switzerland and Spain, who are regular contributors to continued to demonstrate solidarity in coordinating the Fund. Appreciation is also notedfor the strategic efforts to provide a coherent response by consistently guidance and direction provided by members of the providing high-quality technical inputs in reviewing Advisory Board. applications. In addition, the valued added of agencies that made the commitment to carry out peer-to-peer Review Board: monitoring missions during the year, which promoted Basic to the achievements of the HRF was the dedication cross-learning opportunities, is noted. and commitment of the members of the Review Board who in 2011 met 35 times to review and deliberate on OCHA staff and management: proposals. Members devoted their time to review Finally the strategic role played by OCHA, through their applications, engage in discussions on high-level policy valuable feedback on applications and updates from the issues and initiate innovative new ideas. The collective field, the HQ office in Geneva for their support in effort of the Review Board members was vital in administrative functions of processing MOUs and ensuring the continued transparency and accountability transferring payments, and the Funding Coordination of the Fund to all stakeholders. GOAL and IRC served as Section in New York for providing overall guidance and members of the Board for nearly two years before for sharing the pooled fund learning process, is retiring at the end of 2011.IMC and Save the Children acknowledged. US have now taken up their seats. Their tireless work and contributions drawn from their expertise and experience The HRF extends its sincere appreciation for the provide much added value in ensuring the prioritization collaborative support of all our partners and donors and and quality of the projects funded by the HRF. look forward to continued partnership in humanitarian programming. Clusters: Special gratitude goes to the Cluster Coordinators and their respective cluster members for extending their unwavering support and dedicated services to the HRF.

The work of the HRF would be incomplete without the clusters’ engagement in technical reviews of the

3

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

1. Executive Summary

1.1 2011 Humanitarian Context

The impact of the prolonged La Niñaconditions, which to June), while delayed onset of the belg (February to prevailed over the Horn of Africa between mid-2010 and May) rains extended the lean season by at least two the first quarter 2012, was deterioration in the months in many areas. Throughout the country, cases of humanitarian situation in many parts of Ethiopia: malnutrition significantly increased with some 139,066 primarily in the southern and south-eastern lowlands, and severely malnourished children admitted in Therapeutic also in belg-dependent central highland areas of the Feeding Programme (TFP) sites between July and country. As the coping mechanisms of the most November 2011. vulnerable, which had been previously eroded by successive dry spells/drought, were depleted, food and The drought and its impact on mostly pastoralist nutritional insecurity increased rapidly in the most- households (water and pasture shortages, migration) also affected areas, necessitating a significant scaling up of resulted in increased school dropouts across Somali and humanitarian action. OromiaRegions.

Due to the failure of the 2010 deyr (October to Additionally, major outbreaks of epidemic disease, December) and the delayed onset of the 2011 gu (March including measles, malaria, meningitis and diarrhoeal to May) rains, much of the Somali Region and large diseases, posed a grave threat, including in view of the swaths of the southern lowlands of Oromia andSouthern increasing malnutrition in drought-affected areas. Poor Nations Nationalities and Peoples Region (SNNPR) nutritional status, compounded with inadequate coverage experienced acute drought conditions. Critical water and of the routine Expanded Programme on Immunization pasture shortages affected all parts of the Somali region, (EPI), contributed significantly to measles outbreaks, and particularly the seven southern zones; Bale, Borena, which had beenongoing since early 2010 and continued Guji and East and West Hararghe zonesof Oromia; and throughout the year. South Omo, Konso and Derashezones of SNNPR. Severe water shortages affected the lives and livelihoods In addition to addressing the in-country challenges of more than 2.6 million people. stemming from the drought, the Government and humanitarian partners were simultaneously responding to Stemming from the water and pasture shortages, early the massive drought-induced refugee influx from migration (in-country and cross-border with Kenya and Somalia, as well as continued refugees influxes from Somalia) of human and livestock populations was other countries including Sudan and Eritrea. The reported, while livestock body conditions deteriorated, condition of the new arrivals from Somalia in particular productivity declined, and excess livestock mortality was was of great concern, with many of those who poured reported in many areas, particularly in Oromia (Bale, over the border between June and August arriving in a Borena and Guji zones) and in the seven southern zones very weak state. To accommodate the large displacement, of Somali (Afder, Degehabur, Fik, Gode, Korahe, Liben humanitarian partners moved quickly to expand existing and Warder). Combined with rising prices for food and services, including by opening new refugee camps in the fuel and shortages of cereals available in markets Dollo Ado area of Somali Region (three new camps were throughout the region, the decline in livestock opened in 2011: Kobe (June), Hilaweyn (August) and productivity and pastoralist terms-of-trade had a negative Buramino (November)). Some 135,000 Somali refugees impact on food and nutritional security. were receiving humanitarian assistance in the camps and transit and registration centres of Dollo Ado by the end Rapid deterioration in food and nutritional security also of 2011, an increase of 98,380 since the beginning of the became a critical concern in parts of central and northern year. SNNPR and central Oromia that depend on the production of belg(short-cycle) crops. In these areas, the failure of the sapie (January to February) rains led to failure of the sweet and Irish potato crops (important foods for consumption during the lean season from April

4

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

HRF Governance Structure: 2011 HRF Stakeholder Survey: The Humanitarian Coordinator is the overall decision maker of the fund, with responsibility for the final In March 2012, the HRF conducted a web-based decisions on funding approval; the HC signs relevant stakeholder survey to get stakeholder’s perception of its contractual agreements. values and views of the HRF as well as to get what stakeholders thought that the HRF should do to improve its efficiency and effectiveness in humanitarian response. The survey questions were electronically sent to HRF The Advisory Board,met once during the year. The implementing partners including NGOs (international Advisory Board, composed of senior representatives of and local), donors, Government, UN agencies and the UN, Government, donor and NGOs, provides policy clusters. Out of the 52 respondents, 27 were from NGOs level guidance to the Humanitarian Coordinator. (52per cent), 14 from UN agencies (27per cent), 11 from Discussion of key policy issues including access of HRF donors (21per cent) and 1 representing a cluster (2per to NNGOs, HRF budget and implementation duration cent) (see pages 21-23 for more details). caps, and strategic policy position on Disaster Risk Management (DRM) were extensively discussed. On the 79per cent - Board composition is well balanced while 6 issue of direct access to NNGOs,the Advisory Board per cent replied “insufficiently”. agreed on the principle of providing direct access of NNGOs to the Fund and tasked a small working group to 69per cent - Management of the fund is sufficiently work out the details. The Advisory Board unanimously transparent. 12per cent are of the opinion that there needs agreed to keep the project duration (six months) and the to be improvement. budget ($700,000) caps unchanged, noting that the Review Board supported projects beyond the proposed 83per cent - HRF has the right balance between speed duration and/or amount when deemed appropriate. and quality control.

94per cent - Application review process is clear and transparent. OCHA, and specifically the HRF Unit, serves as the fund manager, ensuring that applications conform to 81per cent - the technical feedback from clusters on HRF HRF guidelines and respond to identified priorities, applications helps improve quality coordination and cost effectiveness. After an initial project review, the HRF Unit circulates appropriate 40per cent - HRF processing of project agreements and applications to the respective clusters for technical finalization has improved, 29per cent HRF processing of comment. OCHA tasked by the HC also chairs the HRF project agreements and finalization has stayed the same Review Board and administers the contractual and 4per centsaid that it has deteriorated. agreements and fund disbursements.

The cluster leads, together with the members of their cluster, are responsible for reviewing applications to ensure technical quality, methodology and regional priority. Cluster review processes are iterative; only when the reviewing team is satisfied on the technical front are the revised applications forwarded to the Review Board for funding recommendation.

The HRF Review Board, which is comprised of representatives of UN agencies, NGOs, Red Cross Movement, CCRDA and Government makes a funding recommendation for each project based on the proposal’s merit in addressing identified emergency needs. The Board’s recommendation is passed through OCHA to the HC for decision.

5

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

1.2 Map ­ 2011 HRF Supported Projects The HRF allocated $53 million to 75 multi-sectoral projects implemented by .NGOs and UN agencies. Donor contributions to the HRF amounted to a total of $43 million. The main focus areas of intervention included nutrition, WASH, agriculture and livelihood, protection and support to refugees.

6

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

2. Information on Contributors

2.1 Donor Contributions to HRF

In 2011, HRF received contributions of approximately Fund’s establishment in 2006, it has received a total of $43 million from nine different donors. During the year, $200 million with the three top-ranking contributions the amount of donor funding increased as compared to from DFID (United Kingdom), Netherlands and Sweden. contributions made in the last two years. Since the

Table 1: Contributions from 2006 to 2011 (All contributions in USD) Donor 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total/donor DFID 8,861,284 7,632,793 28,489,852 11,377,560 17,813,610 74,175,099 Netherlands 5,012,000 3,395,940 25,675,674 15,441,176 9,790,210 6,875,000 66,190,000 Sweden 577,565 4,090,487 6,476,850 3,696,600 6,163,328 21,004,830 Norway 1,553,277 2,022,776 2,656,166 2,232,764 764,059 2,155,207 11,384,249 Denmark 4,854,369 5,786,640 10,641,009 Ireland 4,352,603 2,033,133 962,128 7,347,864 Spain 1,347,709 1,506,024 1,221,001 726,744 4,801,478 Switzerland 247,934 689,852 699,301 1,760,333 3,397,420 Italy 857,233 1,010,101 709,610 2,576,944 Private donation 93 93 15,674,495 13,629,074 68,159,576 45,631,278 15,471,870 42,952,693 201,518,986

7

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

3.Fund Overview

3.1 Summary of HRF Allocations in 2011

The HRF largely funded activities in the Nutrition and supplementary feeding for livestock, and distribution of WASH sectors, including support for procurement of seeds; Logistics, including the UN Humanitarian Air corn-soya blend (CSB, the food component of a targeted Service (UNHAS); Refugee response, including the supplementary feeding (TSF) programme) and Ready-to- distribution of NFIs , emergency shelter, construction of Use Therapeutic Food (RUTF, used for the treatment of transitional shelter, water provision, sanitation and severe malnutrition), treatment of severe and moderate hygiene and nutrition. acute malnutrition (SAM and MAM respectively) among children under 5 years and pregnant and breastfeeding Sectorally, nearly half of all allocations were made to women, and rehabilitation/construction of water points support the nutrition response. Geographically, the and emergency provision of water (water trucking). Somali region received the highest amount of HRF Other key sectors funded included Agriculture (and funding. livestock), with support to livestock health treatment,

3.1.1 HRF Allocation by Sector

In 2011, the HRF allocated approximately $53 million water supply for human and livestock consumption was for multi-sector interventions throughout the country. of the highest priority at the peak of the drought.In The majority of the allocations (47 per cent) went to addition, 17 per centof allocations went to support the support thenutrition response, which too often served as emergency non-food needs of the refugees from Somalia, the first line of response to critical food insecurity. The as well as to support host communities in south-eastern second largest allocation went to the WASH sector, in parts of the country. particular for water trucking activities undertaken between March and September. Ensuring emergency

2011 HRF Supported Projects by Education 0.01 Sector(in US$) Contingency to be… 0.22 NFI 0.34 Common Service 1,57 Protection 1.62 Agriculture/seed 1.71 WASH 3.21 Livestock 4.67 Water Tankering 5.94 Refugee 8.87 Nutrition 24.55

0 102030 Millions

8

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

3.1.2HRF Allocation by Region

In terms of geographic distribution, eight regions funding was made for countrywide (multiple-regions) received funding duringthe year. The highest amount interventions,which included the central procurement of went to the Somali region, including the allocations made CSB and RUTF. to support refugee response in DolloAdo and the surrounding areas. The second highest geographical

Gambella 0.05

Tigray 0.46

Amhara 0.48

Benishangul 0.69

Afar 2.72

SNNPR 2.91

Oromiya 8.82

Multiple Regions 17.69

Somali 18.69

0.00 5.00 10.00 15.0020.00 Millions

3.1.3HRF Allocation (by type of Agency and number of projects)

Of the 75 projects funded by the HRF in 2011, 62 were With regard to funds disbursement, approximately 59 per implemented by international non-governmental cent of total allocations were made to NGOs, while the organizations (NGOs) and 13 were executed by UN remaining 41per centwas disbursed to UN agencies. agencies. Local NGOs indirectly accessed the Fund in partnership with HRF implementing partners.

By partner type in US$ Number of UN and INGO Projects

UN Agencies 21,640,435 UN Agencies 13 International NGOs 31,091,937 International NGOs 62 Total 52,732,372 Total 75

9

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

3.1.4 Acceptance versus rejection rate

In 2011, the HRF received a total of 95 proposals and Proposals were rejected at different levels of review: 75(75 per cent) for funding, while 25 were rejected. screening by the HRF team, cluster review or by the HRF Review Board.

UN INGO Total Application received 17 78 95 Application rejected 4 16 20 Application accepted 13 62 75 Acceptance rate (%) 76% 79% 79%

3.1.5 HRF Contributions towards the Humanitarian RequirementsDocument (HRD)

HRF funding towards non-food requirements of the January to June HRD totalled to $18 million, or 29 per cent. In addition, the HRF allocated a total of $10 million or 15 per cent towards non-food HRD requirements for the second half of the year (July – December 2011). In addition, out of the $196.8 million required for non-food assistance for refugees according to UNHCR’s 2012 annual appeal, HRF funded $8.9 million, or 5 per cent. [NB: Refugees are not part of the government issued HRD.]

HRF Response Towards HRD NF Requirement (Jan ‐ Jun 2011) 35,000,000 30,000,000 25,000,000 20,000,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 0 Health and WASH Agriculture Education Nutrition

Requirments (Jan‐Jun) HRF Response (Jan ‐Jun)

10

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

HRF Response Towards HRD NF Requirement (Jul ‐ Dec 2011) 35,000,000 30,000,000 25,000,000 20,000,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 0 Health and WASH Agriculture Education Nutrition

Requirments (July‐Dec) HRF Response (Jul‐Dec)

3.2Results of HRF Projects per Cluster / Sector

Major achievements supported by HRF funding in 2011, as reported by implementing partners

Food Security and Livelihoods – Livestock o 85,057 households (10,282 female headed, 14,134 male headed households ) benefited from all HRF-funded livestock interventions o 56,087 livestock fed with supplementary and survival feed o 24,236 bales of hay and 14,134 quintal of concentrate, 81,500 kilograms of multi-nutrient blocks (MNB) animal feed purchased and distributed o 692,250 livestock treated/de-wormed, 653,647 livestock vaccinated, 7,045 livestock slaughtered through de-stocking, 2,166 households assisted through restocking of 3,790 livestock o 6,862,418 ETB ($403,672) was injected through Cash-for-Work activities to support 3,365 households o 87 community animal health workers (CAHWs) received trainings Food Security and Livelihoods – Seed o 22,657 households (10,684 female headed and 11,973 male headed households) benefited from all HRF-funded agriculture activities o 2,660 quintals of different types of seed and 111 quintals of potato tubers and 6,431,000 sweet potato cuttings purchased and distributed o 2,592 hectares of land planted using the above distributed seed o 12,200 farm tools (of varying types) purchased and distributed Nutrition o 208,432 individuals (81,114 women, 59,392 girls, 4,958 men and 56,416 boys) benefited from HRF-funded nutrition interventions o 1,505 children (742 girls and 732 boys) suffering from SAM with complications treated o 103,017 children (51,767 girls and 49,209 boys) suffering from MAM and 58,722pregnant and breast-feeding women treated o 22,821 children (14,169 girls and 14,157 boys) suffering from SAM treated o 236 metric tons (MT) of RUTF, 2,857 MT of CSB and 62,627 Litres (L) of oil distributed o 4,000 MT of CSB and 583,955 L of Oil procured centrally by WFP o 82 mobile health clinics established or supported

11

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011 o 725 outpatient therapeutic programme (OTP) sites received non-food items (NFIs) such as water purifiers and mosquito nets. o 1,779 health extension workers and 582 community volunteers trained WASH o 1,275,092 individuals (153,278 women, 91,735 girls, 150,633 men and 102,002 boys) benefited from HRF-funded WASH interventions o 106,522,131 L of water distributed o 703,637 sachets of Pur, 96,880 bottles of Wuhagarr, 911,210 strips of Aquatabs purchased and distributed to treat 46,676,670 L of water o 74 water points (38 hand-dug wells, 6 boreholes, 5 ponds 13 shallow wells, 9 motorized schemes and 3 ellas) rehabilitated o 48 water points (4 hand-dug wells, 27birkas, 10 shallow wells and 7 catchment systems) constructed o 575 household latrines constructed o 8 institutional latrines with hand-washing facilities constructed o 545 hand-washing facilities constructed o 846 water tanks of varying capacity procured and distributed o 10,786 jerry cans of varying capacity procured and distributed o 96,324 bars of soap distributed and 49,569 bottles of bleaching agents distributed o 1,188 WASH committee members and community volunteers trained Common Services UNDSS o 141 field missions conducted in 86 locations for security assessments o Nine security-related trainings for 313 UN and NGO staff conducted o 16,083 security clearance requests processed o Movement of 6,145 of UN vehicles (field missions) tracked o 29 office and 126 residential security surveys conducted o 288 weekly reports published o 216 Area Security Management Team (ASMT) meetings held in the project areas o Two high frequency (HF) base radios and 101 mobile very high frequency (VHF)/HF radios installed and programmed and seven VHF/HF radios dismantled UNHAS o 60 agencies benefited from UNHAS flight o 6,276 passengers and 29,232 kilograms (kg) of cargo transported o Increase in number of flights to Dollo Ado from two to five times per week o Seven destinations served NFI o 7,012 HHs benefited from HRF-funded NFI interventions o 1,053 Blankets, 4 rolls of plastic sheets, 310 shelter materials, 8,238 Jerry cans, 1,953 plastic plates, 201 plastic cups, 43 plastic jugs, 1,838 cooking pot, 1,429 sanitary kits, 86 plastic buckets, 86 plastic bowels, 860 Corrugated sheet of iron and 22 roofing nails were purchased and distributed Protection o 4,000 Ethiopian migrants (64 women, 13 girls, 3,150 men and 773 boys) evacuated from Yemen

Refugee (and host community) response

Health o 17,539 refugees(9,685 women, 189 girls, 5,973 men and 228 boys) provided with health services o 6033 individuals treated/received medical consultations o 1,244 individuals treated by specialized doctors o 10,262 individuals reached by outreach programs Nutrition o 12,179 individuals (1,150 women, 4,921 girls, and 4,750 boys) benefited from refugee nutrition programmes o 10,373 children and 1,263 pregnant and breastfeeding womensuffering from MAM reached through blanket supplementary feeding programmes

12

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

WASH o 52,715 individuals (5,231 women, 8,202 girls, 3,539 men and 8,930 boys) benefited from refugee WASH interventions o 37.4 million Lof water distributed o 38,400 Sachets of Purdistributed o 4,000 jerry cans distributed o 49,030 bars of soap distributed o 300 hand-washing facilities constructed 8 tap stands (six taps each) constructed o 3,162 family showers constructed o 4,903 bucketsdistributed o 9,806 plastic basins distributed o 9,806 absorbent cloth distributed o 535 garbage pit were prepared NFI o 8,500 households assisted through provision of standard NFI kits o NFIs distributed included: 9,921 blankets; 7,500 jerry cans; 17,500 plastic sheets;7,053 buckets; 3,000 kitchen sets (type B); 6,235 sleeping mats; 86,900 bars of soap; 17,500 plastic plates and cups; 7,000 cooking pots; 17,500 spoons; 3,500 knives; 3,500 aluminium ladles; 25,326 mosquito nets; 49,200 sanitary kits; and 49,300 pairs of women’s underwear

Emergency Shelter o 8,535 individuals ( 2,448 Women, 2,744 Girls, 1,064 Men and 4,750 Boys) benefited o 2,007 emergency shelter distributed, 300 transitional shelter constructed and 80 persons trained in the tent erection

Note: Age and sex disaggregated data in some sectors do not add up to the total beneficiary number as some implementing partners did not report accordingly.

3.2.1 Nutrition Sector

The nutritional status of communities started to decline The situation in SNNPR, in particular, was very serious. asthe La Niñaconditions that formed in mid- Small family plotsizesand extremely dense population 2010continued into 2011, suppressing rainfall in the means that the most vulnerable families in SNNPR can gu/ganna- and belg-receiving areas. The rapid only harvest enough food for three to four months, deterioration in food security led to a spike in making the loss of even one harvest devastating. malnutrition among children under 5 years and pregnant Moreover, the underestimation of regional relief food and breastfeeding women, including in the affected areas requirements in the 2011 HRD released in February of SNNP, Oromia, Afar and Somali Regions. Monthly meant there was insufficient quantity of food accessible reports from Therapeutic Feeding Programmes (TFPs) in by the most vulnerable households. the regions showed increasing admissions trends between February and May 2011, which then largely held at The HRF allocated $24.5 million, 47 per cent of elevated levels through June and July. Some 290,000 itsannual disbursement, to support nutrition response severely malnourished children were admitted and throughout the country. More than $15 million, or treated in TFPs during the year. approximately 30 per cent of the annual disbursement,was allocated to support the procurement The high number of children suffering from acute and distribution of RUTF and CSB. Of that, $6.5 million malnutrition was of critical concern in belg-producing was committed to supply 99,173 cartons of RUTF to areas of central and northern SNNPR and central OTPs throughout the country, while $9.2 million was Oromia. In these areas, the failure of the sapie (January usedto procure5,805MT of CSB and 670 MT of to February) rains led to failure of the sweet and Irish vegetable oil needed for TSF programmes. Resources potato crops (important foods for consumption during the required for the procurement of RUTF were channelled lean season, from April to June), while delayed onset of through UNICEF, while WFP procured and distributed the belg (February to May) rains extended the lean the CSB required for NGO-managed TSF programs. season by at least two months in many areas.

13

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Additionally,the HRF disbursed a further $8.5 million to Despite four months on the programme, surveyed TSF support 21 nutrition projects implemented by ACF, beneficiaries did not gain weight or show improvement Concern, IMC, Islamic Relief, Merlin, Mercy Corps, in their nutritional status. Significant numbers of TSF Save the Children US, Save the Children UK and World beneficiaries (both children and pregnant and Vision. breastfeeding women) were identified as ‘non- responder’ and thus did not qualify for ‘discharge cured’ During the year, partners reported that performance status. Further, in the absence, of improved household indicators, as established by the Sphere standards, were access to food, relapse resulting in re-entry to inpatient or acceptably attained. Overall, indicators related to outpatient nutrition programmes immediately following mortality and defaulter rates were achieved or exceeded. discharge was common. A recently conducted survey However, standards related to recovery, weight gain, showedthat 30per cent of TSF beneficiaries shared ‘discharge cured’ were difficult to achieve. One reason supplementary food with their family members, and cited for this was sharing of supplementary food among 10per cent finished the supplementary food before the family members. time they were expected to complete it.

Implementing Number of projects Budget in US$ Geographic Area agencies

21 24,553,896 ACF, CARE, Concern, Goal, IMC, IR, Afar, Amhara, Oromia, Mercy Corp, Merlin, SCUK, SCUS, SNNPR, Somali UNICEF Outputs

■ Total number of beneficiaries: 208,432 individuals ■ Gender consideration : 81,114 women, 59,392 girls, 4,958 men and 56,416 boys ■ Project results: • 22,821 children with SAM (14,169 girls and 14,157 boys) treated • 1,505 children with SAM with complications (742 girls and 732 boys) • 103,017 children with MAM (51,767 girls and 49,209 boys) and 58,722 pregnant and breastfeeding women treated • 236 MT of RUTF, 2857 MT of CSB and 62,627 L of oil distributed • 82 mobile health clinics established • 725 OTP sites received NFIs • 1,779 health extension workers trained • 582 community volunteers trained

14

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Best Practice: HRF donation for nutrition response saves lives in Ethiopia – UNICEF

Zara Ahmed was worried. The youngest of her seven children, ten-month-old NayleKelifa, hadnot been eating well and hadlost a lot of weight. Drought in the eastern parts of the countryhaddelayed the harvest of corn, peanuts, cabbage, potatoes and other vegetables that Zara reliedon to feed her children. The family was surviving on what they could buy at the market, but this hadnot been adequate as the cost of food kepts going up. A visit to her local health post in Fedis district (Oromia Region), confirmed that Naylewasseverely malnourished.

When Nayleentered the BelinaArba OTP, there were 41 severely malnourished children already enrolled in the SAM treatment, up from 13 at the same time the previous year (2010).

“The situation is different this year,” said LemlemWorku, a health extension worker assigned to BelinaArba Health Post. “The rains came late. At this time there should be harvests. We wouldn’t have so many children. They would have food to eat. This year it started to rain late, and none of their crops that they would have used to eat are ready.”

As the number of children suffering from severe acute malnutrition increasedin Fedis and neighbouring districts NayleKelifa, BelinaArba Outpatient Therapeutic of East Harerghezone (Oromia Region), the zonal health Feeding Programme, Oromia region, 2011 office dispatched boxes of RUTF, such as the Plumpynut, purchased by UNICEF with HRF support, for use in OTPs at the village level. Today Lemlem has given me medicine for Nayle and these packets of nutritious food to feed her. I believe In 2011, the Government estimatedthat more than these will save my baby.” 300,000 children would require treatment for severe acute malnutrition, a condition that can be deadly if not “We have been receiving adequate supplies of the ready- treated promptly. to-use-therapeutic food and so we are able to treat all the malnourished children that we admit to the programme,” UNICEF’s support for the OTP in Fedis and other said Lemlem. “It is very rewarding work for me. When I drought-affected and food-insecure districts was made see a starving child get better and come back to life, I feel possible by a $ 6.5 million donation from the HRF to blessed, as though the children themselves have said a support emergency nutrition response in hotspot districts prayer for me. I also pray for these children. They will of the country. achieve something in the future, and so I would like to thank those who have made it possible for us to save Nayle weighed 4.8 kg on her first visit to the health post, these children’s lives.” which meant she needed to gain 1.3 kg to be discharged. She had a good appetite, which improved her chances of By the time that Nayle entered the OTP, it had started to recovering. Before leaving the health post,Lemlem gave rain again in Fedis, bringing hope for a harvest in a few Zara a bottle of amoxicillinantibiotic and a week’s supply months’ time. Meanwhile community-based therapeutic of RUTFfrom the supplies provided by UNICEF. feeding programmes were there to ensure that children like Nayle survived. “I brought my daughter here because I want her to be healthy,” said Zara. “I was very worried about her.

15

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

3.2.2 WASH Sector

Severe water shortages affected the lives and livelihoods To support these emergency WASH activities, HRF of some 2.6 million people in 2011. Recurrent drought disbursed some $6 million to support 16 emergency conditions in previous years were aggravated by the water trucking interventions and an additional $3.2 failure of the deyrand belg seasonal rains, leading to million to support six other WASH related projects in early depletion of ground water sources and complete Somali and OromiaRegions in 2011. The HRF funding drying-off of surface water structures (birkas, small for water trucking was used to deliver water during the dams/ellas, ponds, riverside wells) in most parts of critical months of March and April. Among the HRF Somali, the lowlands of Oromia (Bale, Borena, Guji, partners, ACF, CHF, DRC, GOAL, IRC, Oxfam GB, and East Hararge, West Hararge, Arsi and West Arsi zones), Mercy Corps received funding for water trucking. and the southernmost parts of SNNPR (South Omo, Konso and Derashe zone). Despite their importance, the emergency water trucking interventions faced a number of common challenges To address basic WASH needs in affected areas; including: start-up delays, inconsistent use of water humanitarian partners and theGovernment implemented a purifiers and costly water trucking operations due to the range of life-saving WASH interventions, including high cost of hauling water. Moreover, as the water large-scale water trucking, distribution of water shortages expanded, implementing partners were forced purification chemicals, rehabilitation and maintenance of to redistribute available water over larger areas and non-functional water schemes, and hygiene promotion. populations in need. As a result, most of the interventions barely attained 5 liters per person per day, the minimum During the year, large water trucking operations were emergency standard.Overcrowding at some water sources undertaken in the drought-affected areas that faced and intermittent pump and generator breakage meant that critical water shortages. Expanded emergency water water wasnot reaching a village continuously as trucking in all 52 woredas of Somali, in 51 woredas of scheduled. Oromia and in some hotspot woredas in Tigray, Amhara and SNNPR alleviated serious water scarcity. At the In view of the many challenges noted above, the HRF height of the water shortages in April 2011, some 316 supported an independent study on water trucking trucks were deployed in Somali, 210 in Oromia, 14 in interventions. Future WASH Cluster strategy, and HRF SNNPR, 13 in Tigray and 8in Afar providing emergency support, will be adjusted to take into consideration trucking to affected communities. recommendations of this review

Implementing Number of projects Budget in US$ Geographic Area agencies

22 9,152,034 GOAL, Mercy Corps, COOPI, SC UK, Afar, Oromia, SNNPR Oxfam GB, CHF, ACF, DRC, SC US, &Somali Islamic Relief, IRC, IMC, WV, Bread for the World, Oxfam Canada & PCI Outputs

■ Total number of beneficiaries: 1,275,092 individuals ■ Gender consideration: 153,278 women, 91,735 girls, 150,633 men and 102,002 boys ■ A total of 106,522,131L of water distributed 703,637 sachets of Pur, 96,880 bottles of Wuhagar, 187,011 water tabs, 724,199 strips of Aquatabsdistributed to treat 46,676,670Lof water, as well as 846 water tanks, 10,786 jerry cans, and 96,324 bars of soap distributed. ■ Some 74 water points (38 hand-dug wells, 6 boreholes, 5 ponds, 13 shallow wells, 9 motorized schemes and 3 ellas) rehabilitated and 48 water points (4 hand-dug wells, 27birkas, 10 shallow wells and 7 catchment systems) constructed. ■ A total of 575 HH latrines, 8 institutional latrines, 545 hand-washing facilities constructed. ■ A total of 1,188 WASH Committee members trained

16

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

3.2.3 Agriculture Sector Crop and livestock production was poor in most belg- made available for drought-affected areas of Afar and for and gu/ganna/sugum-receiving areas of Somali,Oromia, cereal-producing areas affected by wheat rust inAmhara, SNNP and Afar regions. Emergency livelihood Oromia and SNNP Regions. protection interventions were thus required to protect and eventually help restore peoples’ productive resources. The HRF funding for the sector was informed by the Road Map developed by the Agriculture Task Force Interventions in the Agriculture sector focused primarily (ATF), which prioritized cash-for-work, livestock feed, on livestock relief interventions, including supply of animal health, slaughter destocking and provision of supplementary animal feed, animal health, and seeds and other agricultural inputs for drought-affected commercial and slaughter de-stocking in pastoralist and households. The HRF disbursed $4.6 million for agro-pastoralist areas, as well as provision of emergency livestock-related emergency interventions and $1.7 seeds incropping areas. The primary area of intervention million for agricultural inputs, mainly seeds. HRF for the sector was the drought-affected areas in southern funding supported 14 livelihood projects implemented by and south-eastern Ethiopia, particularly Borena zone CARE, CAFOD, CRS, GOAL, HelpAge,Oxfam Canada, (Oromia Region) and Somali Region. Funds were also World Vision and FAO.

Livestock Implementing Geographic Number of projects Budget in US$ agencies Area

9 6,385,501 CARE, CAFOD, CRS, GOAL, Help- Afar, Oromia, Age, Oxfam Canada, WV and FAO Somali, Tigray Outputs

■ Total number of beneficiaries: 85,057 individuals ■ Gender consideration: 10,282 female-headed and14,134 male-headed households ■ Project results: - 43,168 and 12,910 livestock received survival or supplementary feed - 24,236 bales of hay and 12,088 quintal of concentrated feed distributed - 692,250 livestock treated/de-wormed - 653,647 livestock vaccinated - 2,166 households received a total of 3,790 livestock through re-stocking - 7,045 livestock slaughtered through destocking - 87 CAHWs trained - 6,713,392 ETB ($394,905) was injected through Cash for Work activities for 3,365 house holds

Seed Implementing Number of projects Budget in US$ Geographic Area agencies

6 1,714,791 GOAL, FAO,CARE, Oromiya, Tigray and CRS &HelpAge SNNP Outputs

■ Total number of beneficiaries : 22,657 House Holds ■ Gender consideration : 10,684 Women headed and 11,973 Men headed House Holds ■ A total of 96 quintals of Barely, 85 quintals of Teff, 2,221 quintals of Chickpea, 60 quintal of Haricot Bean, 6,431,000 sweet potato cuttings, 111 quintals of Potato tubers, 58 quintal of Millet seed, 140 quintals of rice seed, to cover a total of 2,592 hectares of land, 384 quintals of DAP fertilizer, 384 quintals of Urea fertilizer, 8,240 liters of pesticides, a total of 12,200 farm tools (3,814 farming forks, 1,907 Hoes, 2,286 Pick Axes, 1,907 Sickle, 379 Shovel and 1,907 Machetes) and 12 personnel protective equipment distributed, 177 agricultural extension workers trained.

17

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Success Story – World Vision

Slaughter de-stocking in Oromia Region Bokaye,a resident of MagoleKebele, Dilloworeda, said “World Vision came at a time of critical need. The situation was dire with carcasses scattered everywhere.”Bokayeadded, “The cow and goatI brought for slaughter de-stocking were already on the verge of death and nearly to be the feast of vultures. I was fortunate getting birr 1,000 from slaughter de-stocking programme by World Vision. I received 800 birr for the cow and 200 birr for the goat.” The meat, however, was rejected asnot meeting the health standards for human. “It is really amazing”, said Bokaye, “to be able to convert a weak and emaciated dying animal into cash.”Bokaye used the cash to support her daughter who is a student in grade 9 in Yabello. She was able to pay the loan she collected from neighbours and purchased grain for herself and the rest of her family. Bokaye said, “I was able to survive the critical month where there was no Drought response building community resilience, food aid. It helped me to cope with the drought until the Oromia region, 2011 time I received food aid.”

Emergency Livestock Supplementary Feeding MoluGolo, who has a family of eight, including six children,and comes from Dida Mega, Dire Woreda,Borena zone, received 3.5 bales of hay and 70 kg of concentrate from the World Vision programme funded by the HRF. He gave the concentrate to two milk cows whose calves had died due to the drought, feeding them 1kg of concentrate in the morning and 1 kg in the evening. As a result of their improved nutritional status, MoluGolois now getting six L of milk daily, of which 3 Lis consumed by the familywhile the remainder is sold in the town ofMega, earning him 15 ETB per day.

Livestock response, Borena drought, 2011 3.2.4Protection

In 2011, a large number of Ethiopian migrants – part of a evacuation of those stranded. IOM provided life-saving constant stream of Africans transiting the country to evacuation assistance for 4,000 migrants from Yemen to cross into Saudi Arabia in search of employment – were Ethiopia with $1,624,868from the HRFfor two stranded by the political upheaval in Yemen. Exhausted successive projects. In addition to the immediate and without further means of sustaining themselves, with evacuation, the migrants received an assistance package no food or water, most migrants were in life threatening upon arrival in Ethiopia, as well as in-country conditions. The Government and other partnersmobilized transportation allowance. resources and explored options to ensure timely

18

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Implementing Number of projects Budget in US$ Geographic Area agencies

2 1,624,868 IOM Evacuation of Stranded Ethiopian migrants from Yemen Outputs

■ Total number of beneficiaries: 4,000 individuals ■ Gender consideration:64 women, 13 girls, 3,150 men and 773 boys ■ A total of 4,000 stranded Ethiopian evacuated from Yemen

3.2.5NFI Sector

Whereas eastern, southern and south-eastern Ethiopia HelpAgeand REST distributed NFI kits to 602 was widely affected by drought, heavy flooding affected households and sanitary materials to 1,490 women.In some 3,952 households in Alamataworeda in Tigray addition, using its immediate response contingency Region of northern Ethiopia in 2011.With thefloods budget of $20,000, Concern distributed NFIs to 43 having damaged crops and farming systems, HelpAge conflict-displaced households in Worebaboworeda of and REST, a local NGO working in partnership with an South Wollo zone, Amhara Region. CARE was granted HRF-receiving agency, conducted a joint assessment and a similar$20,000 contingency to provide NFIs to 13 requested funding to assist the most vulnerable, including displaced households affected by landslides in four people with disabilities, the elderly and women- woredas of East Hararge zone, Oromia Region. headedhouseholds.

Implementing Number of projects Budget in US$ Geographic Area agencies

3 339,715 HelpAge, Concern, CARE and Oxfam Tigray, Oromia and Canada Amhara Outputs

■ Total number of beneficiaries: 7,012 households ■ A total of 1.053 blankets, 4 rolls of plastic sheets, 310 shelter materials, 8,238 jerry cans, 1,953 plastic plates, 201 plastic cups, 43 plastic jugs, 1,838 cooking pot, 1,429 sanitary kits, 86 plastic buckets, 86 plastic bowels, 860 sheets of corrugated iron and 22 roofing nails purchased and distributed

3.2.6Common Services

UNDSS The increasing need for humanitarian assistance due to humanitarian workers. To enhance safety and security the La Niña-induceddrought required expansion of major services for UN/NGO operations in Somali andOromia, humanitarian interventions in affected areas in southern as well as Gambella and Beneshangul-GumuzRegions, and south-eastern Ethiopia, which in turn necessitated HRF co-funded UNDSS with $199,899. Other donors to expanded provision of safety and security services for UNDSS included the United States and ECHO.

19

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

United Nations Humanitarian Air Services (UNHAS) Since its establishment in Ethiopia,UNHAS has partners’ movement. During the year, the HRF funded providedmore predictable transportation services for UNHAS with $1.4 million to provide transportation humanitarian workers to the Somali Region where the servicesfor the humanitarian community, including an absence of reliable commercial air transportation and expanded service serving the Dollo Ado area and poor road infrastructure has limited humanitarian enabling scaling up of the response to the massive influx of Somali refugees there.

Implementing Number of projects Budget in US$ Geographic Area agencies

2 UNHAS- 1,368,178 UNHAS & UNDSS Somali, Oromia, UNDSS- 199,899 Beneshanugl-Gumuz and Gambella Outputs

UNHAS ■ Total number of beneficiaries : 60 agencies ■ A total of 6,276 passengers and 29,232 kg of cargo transported ■ Seven destinations served; and number of flights to Dollo Ado increased from twice to five times per week

UNDSS ■ Total number of beneficiaries: all UN/NGOs operating in project areas ■ 77 security incidents involving UN and NGO staff members attended; 141 field missions conducted in 86 locations for the purpose of security assessments; 9 security-related trainings conducted and 313 UN and NGO staff members participated; 16,083 security clearance requests processed; movement of 6,145 UN vehicles (field missions) tracked; 29 office and 126 residential security surveys conducted; 288 weekly security reports published; 216 ASMT meetings held; two HF base radios (Jijiga and Shire) and 101 mobile VHF/HF radios installed and programmed and seven VHF/HF radios dismantled.

3.2.7Refugee Sector

In 2011, the massive refugee influx from neighbouring household items, for the new arrivals. To help address Somalia required the urgent scaling up of the gaps in all five camps in Dollo Ado (Bokolomanyo, humanitarian community’s response in the Dollo Ado Melkadida, Kobe, Hilaweyn andBuramino), as well as area.With existing response capacity unable to meet the among the host community, the HRF made its largest needs of the refugees pouring into Ethiopia, many of allocation to refugee response since its establishment in whom were in very weak condition, humanitarian 2006. The HRF disbursed $9 million to support ten partners raced to expand their services. Three new refugee response projects implemented by DRC, GOAL, refugee camps were opened in the Dollo Ado area by the IOM,IRC,NRC,Oxfam GB,Save the Children end of the year, to accommodate the 98,380 new arrivals US,UNICEF, World Vision and UNHCR. who fled drought and conflict in their own country to seek refugee in Ethiopia. The Fund was used to successfully reverse the alarming rate of malnutrition reported in some of the camps. The condition of the new arrivals was of great concern Through the HRF, NRC constructed a shelter prototype, with many arriving in a very weak state and suffering which is now identified as appropriate to be replicated from critical malnutrition. In addition, there was a lack throughout all five camps. Further, IRC supplied treated of adequate shelter and core relief items (CRIs), or water to refugees andbuilta temporary water treatment

20

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

facility, and is soon to complete construction of large- As a direct result of the HRF supported interventions, scale and permanent water treatment systems in three semi-permanent structures are now replacing camps (Bokolmanyo, Kobe and Melkadida). Similarly, plasticshelters and tents in refugee camps. Water Oxfam GB completed the construction of a semi- trucking,which used to be random and once every two to permanent water supply system in Hilaweyn. threedays, has been replaced by sustainable regular water systems.

Innovative Approach – NRC Arriving in Dollo Ado malnourished and exhausted, experts, resulted in an innovative practice in shelter Somali refugees were highly vulnerable to the difficult response for the refugees. This design was validated and weather conditions prevailing in the area.Providing chosen through a participatory evaluation adequate shelter as quickly as possible was a life saving involvingrefugee community representatives and intervention. technical shelter experts. The design is being implemented by all shelter actors in Dollo Ado, with the Quick impact emergency shelter response strategy transitionalshelter prefabricated and pre-cut to agreed NRC provided a rapidemergency response to address the dimensions and later assembled by the skilled labour shelter challenges in the Dollo Ado camps using multiple force trained from among both the host and refugee strategies.Dollo Ado being a difficult environment, NRC community. Throughout the implementation process, conducted intensive training of both host and refugee training and work opportunities were created, generating communities on basic site planning, camp demarcation income and enhancing livelihood opportunities for both and emergency shelter construction.This enabled NRC to refugees and thehost community. have a large, qualified work force ready to respond to large influxes in the camps at the height of the refugeeemergency.

Introduction of a new Transitional Shelter model in theDollo Ado refugee camps NRC also advocated for a sustainable, adequate (according to SPHERE-standards) and culturally- appropriate transitional shelter. The introduction of the “bamboo wattle/mud plaster” shelter design, shaped by close workbetween the refugee community and NRC’s shelter

Shelter response, Kobe refugee camp, 2011 Overview of Refugee responses

Health Number of Implementing Budget in US$ Geographic Area projects agencies

2 769,669 IOM and UNHCR Somali and BeneshangulGumuz Outputs

■ Total number of beneficiaries: 17,539 individuals ■ Gender consideration: 9,685 women, 189 girls, 5,973 men and 228 boys ■ A total of 6,033 individuals treated/received medical consultations, 1,244 individuals treated by specialized doctors, 22per cent (10,262 individuals) of total population reached by outreach programmes

21

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Nutrition Number of Implementing Budget in US$ Geographic Area projects agencies

2 1,078,365 GOAL and SC US Somali Outputs

■ Total number of beneficiaries: 12,179 individuals ■ Gender consideration: 1,150 women, 4,921 girls, and 4,750 boys ■ A total of 10,373 children suffering from MAM and1,263 pregnant and breastfeeding women treated and included in blanket supplementary feeding programmes

NFI Number of Implementing Budget in US$ Geographic Area projects agencies

3 2,327,091 DRC, GOAL and UNHCR Somali and BeneshangulGumuz Outputs

■ Total number of beneficiaries: 12,179 individuals ■ Gender consideration: 1,150 women, 4,921 girls, and 4,750 boys ■ 10,500 plastic sheet, 40,900 bars of soap, 17,500 plastic plates and plastic caps, 7,000 cooking pot, 3,500 aluminum ladles, 15,326 Mosquito net, 28,500 Sanitary kits, 35,500 Women underwear, 17,500 Spoons, 3,500 knives distributed

Shelter Implementing Number of projects Budget in US$ Geographic Area agencies

1 2,005,996 NRC Somali Outputs

■ Total number of beneficiaries: 8,535 individuals ■ Gender consideration: 2,448 women, 2,744 girls, 1,064 men and 4,750 boys ■ A total of1,707 emergency shelters distributed and 300 transitional shelters constructed ■ 80 persons trained in tent set-up

WASH

Implementing Number of projects Budget in US$ Geographic Area agencies

2 2,690,660 IRC and Oxfam GB Somali Outputs

22

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

■ Total number of beneficiaries: 52,715 individuals ■ Gender consideration: 5,231 women, 8,202 girls, 3,539 men and 8,930 boys37.4 million L of water, 38,400 sachets of Pur, and 4,000 jerry cans distributed; 8 tap stands (six taps each) constructed ■ 300 hand-washing facilities and 3,162 family showers constructed ■ 49,030 bars of soap; 9,806 plastric basins; 9,806 absorbent cloths; 4,903 buckets (with and without taps) and 535 garbage pits distributed ■ 213 WASH committee members sensitized

23

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

4. Summary and analysis of achievements

4.1 HRF Innovations and Developments in 2011

HRF as an influential actor in Humanitarian Financing in Ethiopia In 2011, the HRF allocated its largest amount of The review supported, in overall terms, HRF expenditure humanitarian funding since its establishment in 2006 in on water trucking as, in the short term, other response to the drought and refugee crises. This life/livelihood saving options were not available. This enhanced the Fund’s position in the humanitarian notwithstanding that it is an expensive and unsustainable response arena, making it the largest contributor to non- activity, sometimes lacking in proper accountability food requirements (excluding the refugee operation). In mechanisms. The findings/recommendations of the addition, HRF administered the second highest evaluationwere released in early 2012 and included: contribution of since its establishment, next to 2008 contribution. • That the activity had largely been undertaken as a logistics exercise with insufficient beneficiary engagement. Increased support to refugee response • That insufficient attention had been given to building The HRF provided its largest amount of assistance for refugee response since its establishment, with $8.8 on existing coping mechanisms. million allocated to the sector in 2011. HRF has • That greater linkage is required between supported key sectoral interventions during the humanitarian and development programmes. establishment of new refugee camps, as well as expanding structures of existing ones. Provision of core These recommendations have been considered in the new relief items (NFIs), setting up of shelters, establishment WASH strategy introduced in 2012. of nutrition response sites as well as expansion of water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) including water trucking and health response were amongst the responses Inclusion of oil in the central supplementary provided. food pipeline During the year, there was insufficient availability of Fast Track: water trucking intervention vegetable oil on the market to meet demand. In such a The process for the application and review of water situation there is a danger that HRF partners act trucking in 2011 differed from the normal procedure due competitively to secure their supplies and thus bid up the to an innovative approach adopted in view of the acute price. Following the successful experience with water shortages critically affecting large populations in centralized procurement ofCorn-Soya-Blend (CSB). The drought-affected parts of the country. The WASH HRF expanded funding of the centralized procurement Clusterdeveloped guidelines as requested by HRF review mechanism to include oil. This had the desired effect of board. The review and approval process that normally reducing prices and stabilizing the pipeline.. . took up to 33 working days was reduced to 20 working days under the fast track approach. Support to the set up of African Union

Humanitarian Fund Evaluation of water trucking activities The African Union convened a Pledging Conference on The HRF Review Board commissioned an independent 25 August 2011 in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, to respond to evaluation of the water trucking interventions supported by the HRF during the year, which was implemented by the humanitarian emergency in the Horn of Africa. An GOAL. The evaluation was to guide future directions estimated $351 million was pledged by Member States, including strategy, methodology, approach and timing intergovernmental organizations and individuals during informed by lessons learnt, best practices and field the Conference, of which $300 million was by the Africa reality. Development Bank for medium and long term food security initiatives. The AU Fund redeemed $4.2 million

24

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

for immediate disbursement to the most affected Cost analysis – Transparent project countries. financing In an effort to increase transparency and allow OCHA was identified as the appropriate body to facilitate implementing partners to compare their financial the process considering its pooled funding management performance with others, the HRF no publishes project experience. HRF in collaboration with the OCHA AU cost data on a regular basis. This shows a breakdown of Liaison Office provided strong support in drafting the comparative staffing and overhead budgets. AU Fund for Drought and Famine Response in the Horn of Africa guideline. It also supported routine Publication - HRF Update management of the fund including setting up of the The HRF revised its regular public information product, Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and Resource theHRF Update, expanding the reporting format to Allocation Committee (RAC). The HRF conducted include strategic information such as the cost analysis, needs analysis of affected countries using OCHA tools summary of key deliverables in each sectors as well as including the Financial Tracking System and updated information on the central stock pipeline. Visual Consolidated Appeal Processes. Further, country-based information including map of humanitarian donors’ funding mechanisms, including Emergency Response presence and HRF funded projects were also included in Funds and the Central Emergency Response Fund the update to improve transparency and information (CERF), were reviewed for prioritization. sharing. The update also provides real-time information of available funding and allocations as well as supported projects. Direct access to HRF for eligible National NGOs Partnership with Government Since HRF’s inception in 2006, national NGOs have In an effort to ensure Government engagement, the HRF been accessing the HRF through a partnership and sub- unit visited the Disaster Risk Management and Food granting approach, receiving HRF allocations indirectly Security Sector (DRMFSS) Early Warning Directorate’s through international NGOs and/ or UN agencies. Deputy Director to discuss the strategies of the HRF and Through this approach, more than 23 NNGOs have its mandate. To increase transparency and support accessed the HRF torespond to needs of vulnerable information sharing, the HRF unit provides regular communities. The HRF, in consultation with CCRDA, updatesto the monthly Disaster Risk Management has now developed a criterion for NNGO access to the Working Group meeting, which brings together all Fund for the consideration of the Review Board. The sectors, clusters and humanitarian partners. The HRF unit proposed requirements include: i) the applicant agency to also met with the Ethiopian Health and Nutrition be legally registered under the new civil society Research Institute (EHNRI) Director to discuss issues of organization (CSO) law; ii) the agency tobe able to concern and improve engagement with the health sector present a bank confirmation letter stating its capacity to in particular. receive and send funds internationally, iii) the applicant agency to require confirmation from UNDP that it has Considerations of Child protection in undergone a UNDP capacity assessment and assigned a humanitarian response “low risk” rating. A working group including Expanding its initiatives into new areas, the HRF unit is membership from the HRF, CCRDA, UNDP and undertaking preparations to include the considerations of representatives of international NGOs was established to specific vulnerabilities affecting children and basic child further explore other tools and harmonize various protection issues in humanitarian response. Discussions existing data bases of assessed NNGOs. have already started with the Child Protection Sub Cluster to develop a check list and self assessment tool to incorporate in the applicationpack in 2012.

25

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Gender Considerations HRF is strengthening its commitment to Gender sensitive as a member of the Review Board. OFDA has become a humanitarian programming by improving accountability non-voting member providing technical comment to measures to ensure the translation of approaches into applications. This has enhanced the broader concept of action. The HRF established a ‘community of practice’ complimentary humanitarian response, avoiding gaps and working group that brings gender focal persons / advisors duplication of resources. of implementing partners to discuss practices and strategies. The HRF is also working with national Protection support to Ethiopian Migrants initiatives in support of the newly established ‘Cluster HRF supported the evacuation of 4,000 Ethiopian Support Teams’ working to ensure the integration of migrant workers stranded in the north of Yemen due to gender in all sectoral mechanisms. insecurity and political upheaval. The migrants were in destitute and vulnerable situation in the border town of Expanded Review Board Membership Harad, trapped without any further means to sustain To ensure collaboration and coordination between major themselves. HRF engaged in this one-time urgently humanitarian donors, the HRF accepted USAID/OFDA needed protection response supporting IOM in providing emergency assistance and evacuation to save lives.

4.2 HRF and Humanitarian Reform

The humanitarian reform process launched by the Cluster Coordination international humanitarian community in 2005 seeks to In 2011, HRF supported the cluster coordination improve the effectiveness of humanitarian response mechanism by aligning its funding strategy with through ensuring greater predictability, accountability cluster/sector priorities. Critical water shortages that and partnership. occurred mainly in southern parts of the country necessitated the need for emergency water trucking The HRF has adopted the humanitarian reform agenda in intervention. In addition, HRF in close consultation with order to increase its predictability, accountability and the nutrition cluster ensured the coverage of priority one partnership. HRF conducted an online stakeholder survey woredas with appropriate response. Further, in order to in 2012 to get insights on its performance. Survey results stabilize the market for purchase of oil, the HRF in were obtained from 52 respondents and summary of the agreement with the food cluster expanded the food basket results related to the humanitarian reform agenda are by including oil. The majority of survey respondents (79 included as follows: per cent) identified HRF as strengthening the cluster mechanism, while only six per cent responded Predictability “insufficiently”. Thanks to donor support, the HRF remained with adequate funding throughout the year.HRF advocated for Partnership additional and increased funds with donors when thefund HRF continues efforts to expand its partnership with was depletingdue to the emergency in the second half of implementing partners HRFcontinues to explore the year. The HRF to date has never rejected a project options,develop modalities and criteria to enable NNGOs proposal due to lack of funding. Stakeholder survey direct access toHRF funding. results also indicated that the HRF provided predictable humanitarian financing in response to emerging humanitarian crisis. About 90 percent of the respondents felt that HRF provided predictable humanitarian funding during the year.

26

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Results from the recently undertaken stakeholder survey HRF resources were used efficiently and effectively. show the common opinion that the HRF performed very HRF in consultation with clusters developed well in demonstrating effective commitment to engage differentapplication appraisal guidelines for reviewing and promote good partnership, with almost 50 per cent HRF proposals including budgetary guidelines. In of respondents answered as “mostly” and 20 per cent of addition, the HRF team monitored funded projects to the respondents replied “completely.” ensure accountability towards beneficiaries. The team

also reviewed final project reports and provided

comments to Adequate and Timely funding implementing partners. All funded projects are audited The survey findings indicated that 83 per cent of either by external or internal auditors depending on an respondents believed that the HRF has the right balance initial agreement. In regards to the HRF transparency, between speed and quality control. HRF had survey results showed that almost all respondents (94 per adequateFunding to respond to humanitarian needs in the cent) felt that the review process is clear and transparent. year. Out of the total non-food requirements as outlined in the 2011 HRD, HRF responded to 27 per cent of the requirements. Most of the respondents (64 per cent) felt that HRF has demonstrated and encouraged improved accountability in humanitarian response. Of these 21.2 percent said “completely”, while the remaining said “mostly”. Accountability and Transparency Survey results indicated that the HRF has demonstrated and encouraged improved accountability in humanitarian response. The HRF took different measures to ensure that

27

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

(Summary of the survey is available on OCHA website at: http://ochaonline.un.org/ethiopia/HRFinBrief/)

28

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

5. Project Monitoring

In 2011, HRF financed 75 projects. 67 of these projects • We endeavour to hold village level meetings with were amenable to on-site monitoring, while the both men & women to find out how and what remaining eight projects were less appropriate for field benefits have actually reached their people. based monitoring as they were related to common services, procurement and emergency evacuation. Out of the 67 projeccts targeted for on-site monitoring, 45 projects were reached through on-site monitoring, consequently 22 projects were not reached and a 67% overall monitoring coverage was achieved. Thirteen of the projects were also visited by other HRF partners through peer to peer monitoring approach.

The year was, however, particularly challenging for HRF partners to engage in expanded peer monitoring due to heightened humanitarian need. Partners were Community meeting, Borena, Miyo, 2011 understandably less willing to allow their overstretched personnel to take part in peer monitoring. However, in any typical monitoring mission we also experience challenges.

Commonly experienced challenges include: • Local authorities dominate the ‘talking’ and might turn out to be gatekeepers creating a buffer between villagers and the mission. • Women are inadequately represented and might not be able to attend and when women attend, men dominate the ‘talking’. • Village level meetings might be rushed due to travel time constraint. Despite the challenges, villagers do take advantage of these meetings to express their concerns.

In a typical community level meeting villagers What does a ttypical HRF on-site monitoring mission might talk about: look like? • Their gratefulness about the work already done, In a typical on-site monitoring mission: • Any of their ongoing concerns, needs and what need • We talk to NGO project personnel. to be done given current humanitarian context; • We seek feedback on intervention outputs and • An account of the cyclic drought that they often outcome from appropriate local government experience, the impact of this on their livelihood and counterpart and woreda administration. general living condition and; • We visit project sites

29

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

• Who actually benefited from the intervention and who has been left out, their perception of quality and of the overall result.

After each monitoring trip we complete a monitoring report and discuss the findings with the implementing partner

Women in SNRS attending HRF monitoring,Moyale, 2011

Key findings of monitoring mission in 2011:

Issue being Answer Sought Common themes Common explanations Other remarks monitored

Timeliness How timely are HRF Partners with Application review process, funded capacity to provide the endorsement of interventions? upfront financing are agreement with regional able to avoid start- government are often difficult up delays. to expedite Progress towards What progress in In spite of startup Plethora of issues including Partners make use the delivery of achieving outputs of delays outputs are of no cost outputs action plan? ultimately realized extension systems Quality of output To what extent do Delay in progress Access related challenges outputs and compromises quality due to security challenges, outcomes adhere to poor infrastructure and supply quality standards shortfall affect quality Quality of How well are the Startup workshops Woreda officials are generally coordination projects and are used to clarify supportive of partners work, partners’ actions responsibilities. Joint whilst coordination with coordinated locally? monitoring with regional partners is not often government also difficult facilitates coordination. Relevance Is the intervention Interventions are Vigilance in understanding relevant to the largely designed to emerging humanitarian humanitarian needs respond to needs, as well as in the area? humanitarian needs participation in coordination forums are useful in maintaining relevance of interventions Participation What is the level of It is difficult to Regardless of partners community ensure satisfactory commitment to participatory involvement? level of participation processes, time pressure and other competing priorities do not permit engagement to the level desired Quality of Who does the Local government Strong government Participatory beneficiary targeting selection? What are does the selection involvement in humanitarian beneficiary the criteria used? response selection needs to be promoted to avoid unjustified

30

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

exclusions. The Is the project Largely effective. Multi-faceted challenges This challenges effectiveness/appro effective in its However, at times including operational were vividly priateness of the progress towards delay in project start limitations inhibit delivery of observed in Water intervention in accomplishing its up challenge the desired outcomes at times. Trucking addressing need stated objective realization of stated interventions objective/s The involvement of Are local NGOs Some of the HRF HRF does not provide direct HRF finalizing local NGOs taking part in partners are not funding to local NNGOs preparations to projects run by direct implementers, open access to partners? they serve as a NNGOs bridge between the HRF and the local implementing NGOs Gender Are the particular Beyond commitment mainstreaming needs of men and during application women, boys and process, quality in girls considered in the realization of implementation? gender mainstreaming is questionable.

31

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

6. Gender Consideration

Expanding its support to gender sensitive programming activities and outcomes. See Table 2 for full table of in humanitarian response, the HRF continued to strongly results. engage in several initiatives throughout 2011. Additionally, the HRF continued to closely work with The Gender Marker compliance rate during the year national initiatives in an effort to align its strategies and stood at 91 per cent with the aim of securing full directions. It is in discussions with the ‘Cluster Support implementation by all projects in the future. From the 75 Teams’ that are established in support of the national HRF supported projects in the year, 58 completed the working group under the Disaster Risk Management marker, while 11 projects being national procurement Technical Working Group (DRMTWG). and common services did not complete as the marker is not applicable and six others were not compliant. In an effort to strengthen its commitment to gender sensitive humanitarian programming, the HRF is It is also notable that there is strong representation of working to improve existing accountability measures to projects that considered gender in the overall project ensure the translation of approaches into action. planning with 79per cent coded under 2a code, indicating that the project is designed to “contribute significantly” The HRF unit established a ‘community of practice’ to gender equality by properly analyzing and integrating working group that brings gender focal persons / advisors the different needs of women/girls and men/boys in the of implementing partners to discuss practices and strategies.

Table 2: EthiopiaHumanitarian Response Fund (HRF) 2011 No. of Projects Total Projects Code 0 Code 1 Code 2a Code 2b Clusters 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011

Agriculture 10 7 1 - 6 - 3 7 0 0 Education 1 - 0 - 0 - 1 - 0 - Food Security ------Health - 2 - - - - - 2 - - Multi Sectoral - 9 - - - - - 6 - - NFI/CCCM/ Emergency 3 4 0 - 1 2 2 2 0 0 shelter Nutrition 7 23 2 - 2 2 3 21 0 0 Protection/UNFPA 1 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 0 UNDSS - - - - 3 - - - - WASH 16 13 1 - 8 3 7 10 0 0 TOTAL 38 58 4 0 17 10 16 48 1 0

Percentage ------10% 0% 45% 17% 42% 83% 3% 0%

Translating Gender Considerations into Practice women) attending targeted supplementary feeding Concern, while implementing a nutrition response in programme (TSFP) from gender based violence. Women South Wollo zone inAmhara region, paid particular discussed and participated in selecting suitable emphasis safeguarding women (pregnant and lactating distribution sites. This was done to reduce walking time /

32

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

distance to and from distribution sites avoiding risks of minimum. Women were encouraged to walk home from extended stays of women on route. As a result, some 12 the distribution sites in groups. This strategy has

TSFP sites were strategically placed near to beneficiaries significantly reduced GBV and is now accepted as homes. Additionally, Concern reported that the length of normal practice. Concern under this project established time people wait at distribution sites was kept to a three functional stabilization centers, supported SAM management in 33 health institutions amongst the expanded support to the CMAM approach.

33

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

7. Conclusion, challenges & way forward

Strategic Engagement with Sectors / Clusters: The HRF unit is exploring ideas to scale up its support to Education and Health sectors in 2012. Discussions have improved humanitarian response in a complementary started with the Education Cluster to develop crisis manner. The peer monitoring increased knowledge and modifiers to support education in emergencies (EiE) skills transfer while the HRF monitoring contributed to within the context of development initiatives. It will ensuring cost effectiveness. HRF will increase its strengthen relationship with the health sector/ cluster monitoring capacity to meet the requirement of visiting at through discussions with the Government counterpart, least 80 per cent of supported projects in a given year. the Ethiopian Health and Nutrition Research Institute (EHNRI). The HRF envisions continued engagement for Global ERF Guidelines: the nutrition sector during the year through provision of The draft ERF Global Guidelinesare appreciated as it predictable nutrition supplies and increased coverage in standardizes approach and procedures to in-country priority one woredas. ERFs. The Guidelineswere reviewed by all stakeholders including donors and humanitarian NGOs.The DRM and HRF: consultation process involves consideration of all In the absence of a funding mechanism that solely stakeholders’ comments to the draft prior to finalization.” supports Disaster Risk Management, HRF, without losing its primary focus of funding direct life saving Turnaround Time: projects, will remain open to support other components Application processing time (turnaround time) analysis of the Disaster Risk Management (DRM) cycle including indicated that on average 33 working days are required ‘preparedness’, ‘mitigation’ and initial steps towards to process an application from submission to MoU ‘rehabilitation’ on case-by-case basis. It also continues to signature, while 15 days on average is required to explore opportunities to create structured linkages and / finalize from MoU signature to actual fund transfer. On or initiate possibilities for parallel support systems with average, 4.3 iterations of each project proposal were other funding mechanisms. (Position paper will be considered as applications passed through the quality included in a box). review process. HRF will work to reduce the processing / turnaround time. Refugee Response: Whilst supportive of any surge in need, the HRF will not get pulled into long term refugee support however it will Gender: advocate with other donors to consider long-term support The absence of a strong lead following the departing of for refugees in Ethiopia. the GenCAP advisor has challenged the strategic advancement of the agenda. Additionally, the existences P2P monitoring: of different working groups and structures without The HRF plans to continue and expand ‘peer to peer proper architecture have also created members fatigue. monitoring’ recognizing its value including expanded monitoring coverage, experience sharing between Strategic Engagement of Water Trucking: implementing partners and enhanced sense of shared Drawing lessons from the independently commissioned ownership of the Fund. Additionally, noting that water trucking evaluation in collaboration with the both‘peer to peer’and HRF monitoring have contributed WASH cluster, the HRF will ensure the development of to Water Trucking guideline that addresses the major issues of accountability and quality of interventions.

34

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Glossary/Acronyms

AWD Acute Watery Diarrhea Belg Short rains from March to May (in highland and midland areas) CCRDA Consortium of Christian Relief and Development Association CERF Central Emergency Response Fund CSB Corn-Soya Blend, a blended food used in targeted supplementary feeding Deyr Short rains from October to December (in Somali Region) DFID The Department for International Development , UK DRM Disaster Risk Management DRMFSS Disaster Risk Management and Food Security Sector DRMTWG Disaster Risk Management Technical Working Group EHNRI Ethiopian Health and Nutrition Research Institute () EiE Education in emergencies ENCU Emergency Nutrition Coordination Unit EPI Expanded Programme on Immunization FSL Food Security and livelihoods GBV gender based violence GM Gender Marker Gu Main rains from March to June (in Somali Region) HC Humanitarian Coordinator HH Household HRD Humanitarian Requirements Document HRF Humanitarian Response Fund IASC Inter-Agency Standing Committee IDP Internally Displaced Person INGO International Non-Governmental Organizations MAM Moderate Acute Malnutrition Meher Long and heavy rains from June to September (in highland and midland areas) MT Metric Tons NFI Non –food items NGO Non-Governmental Organization OCHA Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UN) OFDA Office of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance OTP Outpatient Therapeutic Programme PLW Pregnant & Lactating Women RAC Resource Allocation Committee Region The highest non-federal administrative structure, embracing zones and woredas RUTF Ready-to-Use Therapeutic Food SAM Severe Acute Malnutrition SNNPR Southern Nations, Nationalities and People’s Region TAC Technical Advisory Committee TFP Therapeutic Feeding Programme TSFP Targeted supplementary feeding programme UN United Nations WASH Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Woreda Administrative/geographic unit equivalent to district Zone Administrative unit consisting of several woredas

35

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Annexes:

Annex I: HRF Review Process Diagram

Proposal Review and Fund Disbursement Process/Flow

Proposal Submitted (III) Proposal sent back for modification

Review by OCHA/HRF: identified priorities, budget review according to HRF guidelines, (II) Does Not Meet cost effectiveness Criteria (I) Meets Criteria Review by cluster/ taskforce : technical quality, methodology, regional priority, coordination Meets Criteria Review by HRF Board: national priority, cost effectiveness, coordination Meets Criteria Recommendation of the RB sent to HC for Proposal Rejected approval MOU Sent to Agency

Agency completes MOU

Completed MOU along with signed RB minutes sent to Geneva for clearance

Geneva clears completed MOU

Agency signs on cleared MOU

HC signs MOU and endorsement letter

MOU, HC endorsement letter and disbursement request letter sent to Geneva for fund transfer

Funds Transferred to the Agency

36

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Annex II: List of HRF Review Board Members in 2011

International NGOs CONCERN Save the Children US International Medical Corps

Government DRMFSS – Disaster Risk Management and Food Security Sector, Ministry of Agriculture

UN agencies FAO UNDP UNHCR UNICEF WFP WHO

Others CCRDA (Consortium of Christian Relief and Development Association) Ethiopian Red Cross Society IOM USAID (Observer)

37

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Annex III: HRF Staff Contacts

Name Title Tel E-mail Mike McDonagh Head of Office 0115 444248 [email protected] Tim Mander Program Manager 0115 545336 [email protected] FekaduTafa Programme Officer 0115 444052 [email protected] MeazaDuga Finance Associate 0115 444320 [email protected] SenaitArefaine Programme Officer 0115 444186 [email protected] TersitBelete Programme Associate 0115 444469 [email protected] TigistAlemu Programme Officer 0115 444052 [email protected]

38

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Annex IV: 2011 Certified Financial Statement

Note: The certified financial statement is UNOCHA’s official accounting report. Other figures used in this document are taken from the Ethiopia country office management accounts.

39

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Annex V – 2011 HRF Funded Project Details Code Agency Sector Duration Location Approved Amount

HRF/ETH/O313/258 GOAL IDP (Wash, Seed, 5 months (1 Jan. - Oromia region, Illubabor 329,841 NFI) 31 May 11) Zone,Dedessa Woreda HRF/ETH/O313/259 Helpage Flood 5 months (01 Feb - Tigrayregion, Southern Zone 483,406 (NFI,Livestock) 01 July 11) AlamataWereda HRF/ETH/O313/260 GOAL Water trucking & 2.5 months (15 Jan - Oromiya region, Borena Zone, 295,594 WASH 30 April 11) NCE (31 Miyo, Dire and Teltelle May 2011)NCE 30 Woredas, sep 11 HRF/ETH/O313/261 Mercy Corps Water trucking 3 months (15 Feb - Somali region, Degehabur 170,203 17 May 11) NCE 30 Zone Gashamo District Sep 11 HRF/ETH/O313/262 COOPI WT, WASH & 7 months (05 Feb - Oromiya region,Gugi zone 698,297 Livestock 05 Aug 11) NCE 05 LibenWoreda and Somali Oct 11 region, Liben zone filtu, Doloado and Hudetworedas HRF/ETH/O313/263 SC UK Nutrition 6 months (15 Mar - Somali region, Shinille 372,327 14 sep 11) NCE (15 Zone,Shinille and Nov 11) AyishaWoredas HRF/ETH/O313/264 Oxfam GB WT 3 months (01 Mar - Somali region, Jijiga zone, 331,820 31 May 11) Harshin District HRF/ETH/O313/265 CHF WT, WASH 6 months (15 Mar - Somali region, Warder Zone, 545,022 15 Sep 11) Danot, Bokh, Warder, and Geladinworedas HRF/ETH/O313/266 Helpage Livestock, CFW 9 months (15 March Oromia region, Borana Zone, 700,000 - 15 Dec11) NCE 15 Dire and Dillo woredas Feb 2012 HRF/ETH/O313/267 CAFOD Livestock, CFW 9 months (15 March Oromia region, Borana Zone, 700,000 - 15 Dec11) NCE 15 Miyo and Moyale woredas Feb 2012 HRF/ETH/O313/268 SC US Nutrition 6 months (08 April - Oromiaregion,Guji Zone,Liben, 660,989 09 Oct 11) NCE (9 Gorodola and Jan 12) Sababoruworedas HRF/ETH/O313/269 SC US Nutrition 6 months (08 April - Somali region, Dolo Ado, Dolo 983,161 09 Oct 11) NCE (9 Bay, Filtu, Hudet and Dec 11) Moyaleworedas HRF/ETH/O313/270 IMC Nutrition 6 months ( 11 April - Oromiaregion, West Hararghe 438,005 10 Oct 11) Zone,Miesso, GubaKoricha, and Tullo districts HRF/ETH/O313/271 WV Agr\Livestock 6 months (15 April - Oromiaregion , Borana 700,000 15 Oct 11) NCE 15 Zone,DugdaDawa and Malka Dec 11 Soda Woredas HRF/ETH/O313/272 CARE Agr\Livestock 6 months (12 April - Oromia region, 699,965 12 Oct 11) Moyale,Dire,Teltele and Yabello woredas HRF/ETH/O313/273 IOM Protection 6 months (1 June - Emergency evacuation from 1,030,000 30 Nov 11) Yemen to Ethiopia HRF/ETH/O313/274 ACF Water trucking 2 months (14 April - Somali region, KebriDehar and 430,807 10 June 11) NCE 30 ShekoshWoredas of Korahe Sep 11 Zone HRF/ETH/O313/275 DRC Water trucking 2 months (01 May - Somali region, Awbarre and 383,880 30 June 11) NCE 30 Kebribeyah Districts Sep 11; NCE 31 Dec 11 HRF/ETH/O313/276 SC US Water trucking 2 months (20 April - Oromiyaregion,Guji zone 300,763 20 June 11) NCE 20 Oct 11

40

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

HRF/ETH/O313/277 Islamic Relief Water trucking 1 month (29 April - Somali region, Afder Zone in 257,610 29 May 11) NCE 30 six Woreda (districts) Sep 11 Hargelle,Charati,Elkare, Gorobaqaqsa , Gurradhamole and QersaDula in 68 sites HRF/ETH/O313/278 SC US Water trucking 2 months ( 20 April - Somali region, Dolo Ado, Dolo 300,763 20 June 11) NCE 20 Bay and Filtu Oct 2011 HRF/ETH/O313/279 SC US Water trucking 2 months (20 April - Somali region, 258,784 20 June 11) NCE 20 Moyale&Hudetworedas Oct 2011 HRF/ETH/O313/280 Oxfam GB Water trucking 2 months (01 May - Somali region, Jigjiga 449,249 30 June 11) NCE 30 zone,Harshin District Oct 11 HRF/ETH/O313/281 IRC Water trucking 8 weeks (01 May -30 Somali region,Degehabur and 442,713 June 11) NCE 27 Jijiga, Zones Oct 11 HRF/ETH/O313/282 UNHAS Common Services 12 months (31 Jul - Somali region 1,368,178 31 Jul 12) HRF/ETH/O313/283 IMC Water trucking 2 months (01 May - Oromiya region, East Hararge 164,344 30 June 11) NCE 15 zone,GolaOda, Kumbi and Nov 11 MeyuMulukeworedas HRF/ETH/O313/284 WV Water trucking 2 months (27 April - Oromia region, Borana zone: 250,872 27 June 11) NCE 27 Malka Soda Woreda Oct 11 HRF/ETH/O313/285 Mercy Corps Nutrition 6 months (22 June - Somali region, Afder Zone, 279,906 22 Dec 11) NCE 31 Guradamole and QersaDula Jan 12 Districts HRF/ETH/O313/286 BFTW(SSA) Livestock, WASH 6 months (27 June - Afar region, Zone 1 – Eli 468,300 27 Dec 11) DaarWoreda: Andabba&Su’ula,KoriWoreda: Daaba, Kori/Dabaysma, LubakDaa and Ta’asuli,AssaitaWoreda: Kutubla and Zone 2 – BiduWoreda: Te’o, Sodonta&AlobkeeGarbo HRF/ETH/O313/287 IMC Nutrition, WASH 6 months (06 Jun - Oromiaregion, East Hararghe 356,248 07 Dec) Zone, Babile, GoloOda, Kumbi and MeyuMuluke Districts

HRF/ETH/O313/288 Islamic Relief Nutrition 6 months (26 July - Somali region, Afder 230,668 27 January 11) NCE Zone,Elekere Woreda 31 Mar 12 HRF/ETH/O313/289 UNICEF Nutrition (RUTF) 12 months (15 July - Country Wide 6,568,602 15 July 11) HRF/ETH/O313/290 Merlin Nutrition 6 months (28 June - Oromiya region, Bale Zone, 470,748 27 January) NCE 31 Ginnir, Raiytu, Sawena, Mar 12 Legehida, Guardamole, Gololocha, DaweKachen and Berbere HRF/ETH/O313/291 WFP (Joint) Nutrition (CSB) 12 months (31 July - Country wide 5,156,107 TSFP 31 July 12) HRF/ETH/O313/292 UNICEF Nutrition (CSB) 12 months (15 July - Country wide 266,801 (Joint) TSFP 15 July 12)

HRF/ETH/O313/293 Mercy corps Nutrition 6 months (1 July - Somali region,Erer & Afdem – 95,273 31 December 11) Shinile Zone; Aware & Gashamo – Degehabur Zone

HRF/ETH/O313/294 Concern Nutrition, seed 6 months (28 June - Amhararegion, North Wollo 221,611 31 December 11) Zone, DelantaWoreda HRF/ETH/O313/295 IOM Protection 5 months (01 Jul - Yemen, Ethiopia 594,868 31 Nov 11) HRF/ETH/O313/296 SC US Nutrition 6 months (25 Jul - SNNP region, Derashe, 514,998 25 Jan 12) NCE (30 AlleWoredas of Segene Area April 2012) People’s Zone and

41

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

LanfaroWoreda of Silti Zone

HRF/ETH/O313/297 WV Nutrition 6 months (02 Aug - SNNP region, Hadiya Zone, 114,939 02 Feb 12) East and West BadawachoWoredas HRF/ETH/O313/298 FAO Yellow Rust 6 months (29 August Amhara, Oromia and SNNP 775,000 - 29 Feb 12) regions HRF/ETH/O313/299 Oxfam GB WASH (joint) 6 months (02 Aug - Oromia region (Borena zone) 317,816 02 Feb 12) and Somali region (Afder and Liben) HRF/ETH/O313/300 Oxfam WASH (joint) 6 months (15 August Oromia region (Borena zone) 470,156 Canada - 15 February 12) and Somali region (Afder and NCE 30 April 12 Liben) HRF/ETH/O313/301 IRC WASH (Refugee) 4 months (01 August Somali region, Kobe refugee 444,560 - 30 Nov 11) camp HRF/ETH/O313/302 CARE Nutrition 6 months (27 July - Oromia region, Chiro, 605,503 31 Jan 12) Gemechis, Doba and MesellaWoredas of West Hararghe Zone and Girawa, Kurfachele and BeddenoWoredas of East Hararghe Zone HRF/ETH/O313/303 Concern Nutrition 5.5 months (27 Jul - SNNP region,Wolayita 380,755 31 Jan 12) Zone,DigunaFango, KindoDidaye, KindoKoysha, Damot Gale, DamotWeydieWoredas HRF/ETH/O313/304 ACF Nutrition 5 months (01 Jul - SNNP region,Sidama 442,050 31 Dec 11) NCE 29 zone,AletaWondo, Feb 12 AletaChuko&Wonshoworedad, HRF/ETH/O313/305 IMC WASH and Nutrition 5.5 months (08 Aug SNNP region, Wolayta 459,421 - 15 Feb 12) Zone,Humbo, Boloso Sore and Boloso Bombe Districts HRF/ETH/O313/306 Oxfam Livelihood 6 months (1 Sep - Oromiaregion , Borena 661,576 Canada 29 Feb 12) Zone,Arero, Dhas and Telteleworedas HRF/ETH/O313/307 SC UK WASH, education 6 months (1 Aug - Somali region , Afder Zone,12 534,327 31 Jan 12) NCE 31 Kebeles in Bare Woreda March 12 HRF/ETH/O313/308 SC UK Nutrition 6 months ( 1 Aug - SNNP region, 359,824 31 Jan 12) NCE 31 ShashegoWoreda in Silte March 12 Zone,(Hotspot Woreda Priority 1), ulbaregworeda in Hadiya zone HRF/ETH/O313/309 NRC Shelter (Refugee) 6 months (1 Sep - Somali regiona,Liben 2,025,996 29 Feb 12) Zone,Dolo Ado Woreda HRF/ETH/O313/310 DRC NFI (Refugee ) 5 months (01 Sep - Somali region, Liben zone, 1,207,379 31 Jan 12) NCE 30 Dolo Ado woreda April 12 HRF/ETH/O313/311 PCI WASH (AWD) 6 months (1 Sep - Afar region, Dubti, Afambo, 337,635 29 Feb 12) Aysaita, BureModiytu, Gewane and Mille Woredas HRF/ETH/O313/312 SCUK Nutrition 9 months (26 Sep - Afar region, Erebti, Megalle, 1,365,948 26 June 12) NCE Teru, Yalo, Gulina , Awra (26 Sep 12) ,Elidaar, Bidru, Kori, Dubti ,Asayta , Dalifage, Hadelila, Semurobi, Gewane , Buremudayto and Dalulworeda HRF/ETH/O313/313 Oxfam GB Refugee(WASH) 4 months (01 Sep - Somali region, Liben 2,266,100 31 Dec 11) NCE 31 Zone,Dolo Ado District Jan 12 HRF/ETH/O313/314 FAO FSL (Seed) 7 months (1 Sep - 19 woredas in East and West 197,356 31 Mar 12) Haraghe zones of Oromiya and GamoGofa zone of SNNP

42

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

HRF/ETH/O313/315 CARE FSL (Seed) 7 months (1 Sep - 19 woredas in East and West 192,728 31 Mar 12) Haraghe zones of Oromiya and GamoGofa zone of SNNP

HRF/ETH/O313/316 CRS FSL (Seed) 7 months (1 Sep - 19 woredas in East and West 168,860 31 Mar 12) Haraghe zones of Oromiya and GamoGofa zone of SNNP

HRF/ETH/O313/317 WVE FSL (Seed) 7 months (1 Sep - 19 woredas in East and West 192,838 31 Mar 12) Haraghe zones of Oromiya and GamoGofa zone of SNNP

HRF/ETH/O313/318 UNICEF Health (refugees) 6 months (20 August Refugee camps in Somali, 509,669 - 20 February 12) Afar, Tigray, Gambella + host community in Dollo Ado HRF/ETH/O313/319 GOAL NFI (Refugees) 2 months $ 11 days Somali region, Liben zone, 500,000 (1 Sep - 11 Nov 11) Dolo Ado District HRF/ETH/O313/320 UNDSS Common Services 6 months (20 sep - Somali, Oromia, Benishangul- 199,899 20 Mar 12) Gumuz & Gambella Regions HRF/ETH/O313/321 WFP (Central Nutrition (CSB) 12 months (01 Sep - Country Wide 4,074,243 procurement) 30 August 12) HRF/ETH/O313/322 GOAL Water Trucking 4 months (01 Oct - Oromiya region, Borena zone, 295,000 31 Jan 11) NCE 31 Moyale, Miyo and Dire Mar 12 Woredas HRF/ETH/O313/323 IOM Refugee (Health) 5 months (01 Somali region, Liben Zone 260,000 September - 01 January 12) HRF/ETH/O313/324 ACF Nutrition 7 months (20 oct - Somali region, Korahe Zone, 297,061 20 May 12) Shilabo and DoboweinWoredas HRF/ETH/O313/325 CHF WT and Wash 5 months ( 20 Oct - Somali region, Warder zone, 691,445 20 Mar 12) Danot , Bokh , Warder , and Geladinworedas HRF/ETH/O313/326 Merlin Nutrition 9 months (2 Nov - 2 Somali region, Gode 292,538 Aug 12) Zone,FerferWoreda HRF/ETH/O313/327 UNHCR Refugee (NFI) 2 months ( 01 Jan - BenishangulGumuz 639,712 30 June 12) HRF/ETH/O313/328 SC US Refugee (Nutrition) 7 months (01 Dec - Somali region, Boqolomayo 709,365 27 Jun 12) refugee camp, Dolo Ado Woreda HRF/ETH/O313/329 VSF G FSL (Livestock) 6 months (15 Dec - Afar region, Abala and 578,659 15 June 12) NCE Afderaworedas (23 Oct 12) HRF/ETH/O313/330 VSF S FSL (Livestock) 7 months (15 Dec - Somali region, Hargelle and 606,347 15 June 12) NCE Godeworedas (23 Oct 12) HRF/ETH/O313/331 GOAL Health and Nutrition 6 months (15 Dec - Somali region, Dollo Ado, 389,000 (refugee) 15 June 12) Buramino Refugee Camp, HRF/ETH/O313/332 MC Nutrition 6 month (23 Dec - Somali region, Afder 197,944 22 Jun 12) Zone,Guradamole and QersaDuladistricts

GRAND TOTAL 52,732,372

43

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Annex VI: Planned Vs. Achievements

NUTRITION SC UK - 263 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct beneficiaries 9,014 5,223 Women 4,056 Girls 2,808 Men 4,958 Boys 3,433 SAM children treated Number 334 520 Girls 234 Boys 286 MAM children treated Number 3,013 5,721 Girls 2,574 Boys 3,147 Pregnant and nursing mothers treated Number 1,166 2,773 Famix/CSB distributed Metric Tones 72 Oil distributed (indicate source) Number 10.9 Mobile health clinics established/OTP Number 9 Health Extension Workers trained Number 54 54 Male 23 Female 31 Health Professionals trained Number 57 85 Male 59 Female 26 Community volunteers training trained Number 165 193 (Basic and Refresher) Male 138 Female 55

44

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

SC US - 268 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct beneficiaries 6,300 8,697 Women 1,401 3,354 Girls 2,450 2,637 Boys 2,449 2,706 SAM children treated Number 870 1,655 Girls 428 801 Boys 442 854 SAM cases with complication treated Number 87 95 Girls 42 46 Boys 45 49 MAM children treated Number 3,942 3,593 Girls 1,980 1,790 Boys 1,962 1,803 Pregnant and nursing mothers treated Number 1,401 3,354 Famix/CSB distributed Metric Tones 82.3 132.5 50.2 MT from SC UK & SC Italy fund from HRF's Central Procurement facility from other source (indicate source) Oil distributed (indicate source) Number 8.8 47.1 38.3 MT from SC UK & SC Italy fund Health Extension Workers trained Number 103 116 SC US - 269 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct beneficiaries 10,432 34,377 Women 2,820 12,247 Girls 3,208 10,843 Boys 3,253 11,287 SAM children treated Number 1,086 2,341 Girls 532 1,012

45

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Boys 554 1,329 SAM cases with complication treated Number 110 231 Girls 53 109 Boys 57 122 MAM children treated Number 5,265 9,059 Girls 2,623 4,502 Boys 2,642 4,557 Pregnant and nursing mothers treated Number 2,820 8,807 Famix/CSB distributed Metric Tones 188.2 131 57.2 MT from SC UK & SC Italy fund from HRF's Central Procurement facility from other source (indicate source) Oil distributed (indicate source) Number 20.3 53 33.3 MT from SC Italy & SC UK fund Mobile health clinics established Number 23 21 Health Extension Workers trained Number 191 187 IMC - 270 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct beneficiaries 8,017 6,608 Women Number 1,199 1,966 Girls Number 3,409 2,520 Boys Number 3,409 2,122 Girls Number 565 1,491 Boys Number 565 1,279 Girls NA 116 Boys NA 97 MAM children treated Number IMC provided supplementary food for non-EOS Girls 1,232 1,029 beneficiaries Boys 1,232 843 Pregnant and nursing mothers treated Number 1,199 1,966 RUTF/plumpy nut distributed Metric Tones NA NA

46

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

from other source (indicate source) MT 392.6 MT 77,438.45 KG Oil distributed (indicate source) Number 42.2 MT 8,478.4 KG The remaining balance handed over for DPPO Mobile health clinics established Number 18 26 Health Extension Workers trained Number Male 0 148 212 refresher training and 36 basic training OTP/SC sites received NFIs (indicate Number 85 85 type) Other major deliverables (indicate type 30 Food distribution and number) agents, 33 health professionals and 74 community volunteers received trainings ISLAMIC Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark RELIEF - Accomplishment 288 Women =339 339 339 Girls =522 522 522 Men=282 282 282 Boys=587 587 587 Number of emergency drug kits Number 1 1 distributed Number of mobile health clinics Number 2 2 established Number of mobile health workers trained Number 14 14 Female =2 Male 12 Number of health extension workers Number 40 40 trained Community volunteers Training Female 26 26 26 only Measurable Indicators Remark UNICEF - Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project 289 Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct beneficiaries 108,000 114,050 We were able to procure more RUTF for the allocated HRF

47

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

funds

RUTF/plumpy nut distributed Metric Tones/cartons 98,148 99,173

MERLIN - Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark 290 Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct beneficiaries 33,308 29,586 Women No of direct beneficiaries NA 25,119 Girls No of direct beneficiaries NA 2,680 Boys No of direct beneficiaries NA 1,787 SAM children treated No of direct beneficiaries 503 366 Girls No of direct beneficiaries 182 Boys No of direct beneficiaries 184 SAM cases with complication treated No of direct beneficiaries 75 59 Girls No of direct beneficiaries 30 Boys No of direct beneficiaries 29 MAM children treated No of direct beneficiaries 11006 4,254 Girls No of direct beneficiaries 2,041 Boys No of direct beneficiaries 2,213 Pregnant and nursing mothers treated No of direct beneficiaries 2751 2,117 RUTF/plumpy nut distributed Metric Tones Famix/CSB distributed Metric Tones 260 MT 154.075 MT Oil distributed (indicate source) Liters 28,091 Liters 15,385 Liters Male Number NA NA Female Number 40 61 WFP - 291 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct beneficiaries 90,946 40,857 Women 24,463 19,227

48

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Girls 32,578 20,020 Men - - Boys 33,905 20,837 MAM children treated Number 66,482 40,857 Girls 32,578 20,020 Boys 33,904 20,837 Pregnant and nursing mothers treated Number 24,463 19,227 Famix/CSB distributed Metric Tones 4,381 1,405 Oil distributed (indicate source) Number 601 170 WFP-321 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Famix/CSB Procured 3,927 4,434 Oil Procured 445 500 UNICEF - Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark 292 Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct beneficiaries 90,946 40,857 Women 24,463 19,227 Girls 32,578 20,020 Men - - Boys 33,905 20,837 Other major deliverables (indicate type Number of children 38,816 20,367 and number) screened Other major deliverables (indicate type Number of PLW screened 16,948 11,309 and number) MERCY Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark CORP - 293 Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct beneficiaries 3,328 18,423 SAM children treated Number 161 2,397 Girls 1,235 Boys 1,164 MAM children treated Number 2,471 8,975

49

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Girls 4,350 Boys 4,625 Pregnant and nursing mothers treated Number 7,051 CONCERN - Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark 294 Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct beneficiaries 2,186 2,440 Women 489 746 Girls 883 956 Boys 814 738 SAM children treated Number 346 225 Girls 180 120 Boys 166 105 SAM cases with complication treated Number 17 Girls 7 Boys 10 MAM children treated Number 1351 1452 Girls 703 829 Boys 648 623 Pregnant and nursing mothers treated Number 489 746 RUTF/plumpy nut distributed Metric Tones 4.36 from other source (indicate source) 78 117.147 71.925 Mt from WFP and 45.222Mt from CWW Oil distributed (indicate source) Number 9,354 13,045 8,955 lit. From WFP and 4,090 lit. from CWW Health Extension Workers trained Number On-the-job training provided continuously Provision of wheat seed Metric Tones 86 76 2,581 households (HHs) benefited Provision of potato seed Metric Tones 25.6 5 185 HH benefited Provision of lentils seed Metric Tones 0 33.2 1,873 HHs benefited

50

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

SC US - 296 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct beneficiaries 9,466 2,774 Women 2,074 86 Girls 3,684 1,379 Men 0 0 Boys 3,708 1,309 SAM children treated Number 2,149 711 Girls 1,064 352 Boys 1,085 359 SAM cases with complication treated Number 215 58 Girls 106 30 Boys 109 28 MAM children treated Number 5,243 1,919 Girls 2,617 997 Boys 2,626 922 Pregnant and nursing mothers treated Number 2,074 86 Famix/CSB distributed Metric Tones 38.7 Oil distributed (indicate source) Number 21.4 Mobile health clinics established Number 0 0 Health Extension Workers trained Number 199 31 CARE - 302 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct beneficiaries 30,841 23,501 Women 4,359 8,860 Girls 12,587 8,860 Men 260 Boys 13,635 5,781 Girls 3,480 3,005 Boys 3,769 2,768

51

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Girls 183 326 Boys 198 320 Girls 8,924 8,860 Boys 9,668 5,781 Pregnant and nursing mothers treated 4,119 3,780 from HRF's Central Procurement facility 239.05 223.3 Oil distributed (CARE purchase and WFP) Metric Tones 41 31.4 Female 77 271 OTP/SC sites received NFIs (indicate 89 251 type) CONCERN - Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark 303 Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct beneficiaries 4,050 7,807 Women 1,069 3,385 Girls 1,505 2,357 Boys 1,476 2,065 SAM children treated Number 1,857 1,500 Girls 938 755 Boys 919 745 SAM cases with complication treated Number 186 32 Girls 94 15 Boys 92 17 MAM children treated Number 2,981 2,890 Girls 1,505 1,587 Boys 1,476 1,303 Pregnant and nursing mothers treated Number 1,069 3,385 RUTF/plumpy nut distributed Metric Tones 22.04 Famix/CSB distributed Metric Tones from HRF's Central Procurement facility 185.9 185.9 HRF from other source (indicate source) Metric Tones 8.9 CWW, of which 4.5mt handed over to DPP

52

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Oil distributed (indicate source) Number 21,660 25,500 HRF and CWW (A total of 29,251 was purchased & delivered, of which 25,500.5 was distributed to beneficiaries, 1.5 lit damaged and the remaining 3,749 was handed-over to DPP at the end of the project period. Health Extension Workers trained (SAM Number 278 149 management) Male 6 Female 143 Health professionals trained SAM Number 42 129 management) Male 73 Female 56 Training of Community Volunteers Number 343 354 (200 men and 154 women) ACF -304 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct beneficiaries 4,007 Women 377 Girls 1,476 Boys 1,566 SAM children treated Number 4,931 3,042 62% Girls 1,476 Boys 1,566 SAM cases with complication treated Number 0 31 MAM children treated Number 557 Pregnant and nursing mothers treated Number 377 Famix/CSB distributed Metric Tones 13.447 9.247 MT for TSFP + 4.2 MT for TFP from HRF's Central Procurement facility 13.447 Oil distributed (indicate source) Number 2.563 1.051 MT for TSFP + 1.512 MT for TFP Health Extension Workers trained Number 29 30 103%

53

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Female 30 OTP/SC sites received NFIs (indicate cooking and hygiene kits 3 TFUs type) Other major deliverables (indicate type rehabilitation of TFU 3 and number) IMC - 305 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct beneficiaries 11,209 9,366 Women Number 2,673 3,820 Girls Number 4,268 2,996 Men Number 0 0 Boys Number 4,268 2,550 SAM children treated Number 3,064 1,726 During implementation period, the nutrition situation was Girls Number 1,532 875 stable Boys Number 1,532 851 SAM cases with complication treated Number NA 58 Specific target was not set for SAM children with medical Girls NA 29 complication Boys NA 29 MAM children treated Number 5,472 3,820 Due to delay in program start up and late collection of SFP Girls 2,736 2,121 food from WFP, we could not Boys 2,736 1699 able to meet 100% of the target towards MAM. Pregnant and nursing mothers treated Number 2,673 2,201 Due to delay in program start up and late collection of SFP food from WFP, we could not able to meet 100% of the target towards MAM. RUTF/plumpy nut distributed Metric Tones 33.5 MT 183.4 MT IMC transports plumpy nuts from zone to target health posts (provision of logistical support). Famix/CSB distributed Metric Tones 351.8 MT 219 MT from other source (indicate source) MT 351.8 MT 219 MT Oil distributed (indicate source) Number 38.1 MT 24 MT Health Extension Workers trained Number 178 289

54

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Male 0 8 Female 178 281 OTP/SC sites received NFIs (indicate Number 88 91 type) SC UK 308 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct beneficiaries 8,566 7,373 Women 1,452 2,557 Girls 4,005 2,618 Boys 4,007 2,098 SAM children treated Number 848 962 Girls 424 440 Boys 424 522 SAM cases with complication treated Number 159 32 Girls 78 16 Boys 79 16 MAM children treated Number 6,107 1,582 Girls 1,122 889 Boys 1,121 693 Pregnant and nursing mothers treated Number 1,452 631 RUTF/plumpy nut distributed Metric Tones 14 8 Famix/CSB distributed Metric Tones 122 75 from HRF's Central Procurement facility 82 65 from other source (indicate source)-WFP 40 25 Oil distributed (indicate source) Number 13.5 8 Health Extension Workers trained Number 110 113 Male 10 38 Female 100 75 OTP/SC sites received NFIs (indicate 52 55 type)

55

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

SC UK - 312 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct beneficiaries 59,862 4,493 Women 29,931 347 Girls 4,479 2,100 Men Boys 25,452 2,046 SAM children treated Number 3,716 4,015 Girls 2,028 Boys 1,987 SAM cases with complication treated Number 29 Girls 15 Boys 14 MAM children treated Number 24,895 131 To run the Targeted supplementary feeding Girls 72 program in 6 WFP supported Boys 59 EOS/TSFP woreda, agreement with WFP and Pregnant and nursing mothers treated Number 4,479 347 DPPFSCO was signed in December. Later WFP reduced the EOS/TSFP woreda from 6 to 4 (Megale, Dalol, Elidaar and Erebti) and The amended MOU was signed in late March by RHB,DPPFSCO, and sent to Addis for WFP and SCUK . Concerning TSFP was planned to be directly implemented by SCUK in 9 Non TSFP/EOS woreda. The project team made the necessary preparation to kick start the program the earliest possible time. However, the SFP Ration was seriously delayed despite SCUK’s submission of request to HRF

56

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

and WFP in Several occasions. The first consignment of 171 MT of CSB and 20 MT of edible Oil was received in First week of March 2012. RUTF/plumpy nut distributed Metric Tones 36.9 MT of RUTF Famix/CSB distributed Metric Tones 2 MT of CSB from HRF source Oil distributed (indicate source) Number 239 lt Mobile health clinics established Number The service is provided on already existing health structure and some outreach activities Health Extension Workers trained Number 256 Male 104 Female 102 OTP/SC sites received NFIs (indicate 96 type) ACF - 324 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries no of direct beneficiaries 24,29 340 Women 14,94 59 Girls 144 Boys 135 SAM children treated Number 935 340 Girls 561 144 Boys 374 135 SAM cases with complication treated Number 120 2 Girls 72 2 Boys 48 0 Pregnant and nursing mothers treated 1,494 59 RUTF/plumpy nut distributed Metric Tones 21.6 5.12

57

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Famix/CSB distributed Metric Tons (WFP) 23.28 0.125 Not yet supply by WFP, currently using available stock

Oil distributed (indicate source) Liters(WFP) 2,805 14 Not yet supply by WFP, currently using available stock Sugar distributed Kgs(WFP) 2,805 4.5 Mobile health clinics established Number 10 10 Health Extension Workers trained Number 20 26 Female 26 Nurses trained 10 4 male 5 1 Female 5 3 CVs trained 50 35 male 25 28 Female 25 7 OTP/SC sites received NFIs (indicate 2 SC, 1 per site received 2 2 type) medical supplies

Other major deliverables (indicate type blankets 100 20 and number) mats 60pcs 20pcs kerosene stove 60lits 10 lits mosquito net 120 20 cooking pot 10 4 charcoal 24bags 6bags traditional stove 2 2 MERLIN - Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark 326 Accomplishment Total beneficiaries: 3262 No of direct beneficiaries 3,262 162 Women No of direct beneficiaries 324 74 Girls No of direct beneficiaries 1,305 40 Men No of direct beneficiaries 0 0 Boys No of direct beneficiaries 1,633 48

58

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

SAM children treated No of direct beneficiaries 294 42 Girls No of direct beneficiaries 131 19 Boys No of direct beneficiaries 163 23 SAM cases with complication treated No of direct beneficiaries 73 2 Girls No of direct beneficiaries 32 1 Boys No of direct beneficiaries 41 1 MAM children treated No of direct beneficiaries 2,571 44 Girls No of direct beneficiaries 1,141 20 Boys No of direct beneficiaries 1,430 24 Pregnant and nursing mothers treated No of direct beneficiaries 376 74 RUTF/plumpy nut distributed Metric Tones Famix/CSB distributed Metric Tones 373.8 Kg from HRF's Central Procurement facility Metric Tones 373.8 Kg from other source (indicate source) - Oil distributed (indicate source) Liters 89ltrs (In country procurement) Mobile health clinics established Number 5 Health Extension Workers trained Number 18 Male Number 10 Female Number 8 OTP sites received NFIs (indicate type) Plastic basin, Pcs 10 Plastic sheets, Pcs 10 Plastic with lead. Pcs 10 SC sites received NFIs (indicate type) Pcs Mattress Pcs 6 Small bowls, Pcs 8 Water jug Pcs 13 Thermos Pcs 2 Kittle Pcs 1

59

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Plastic cups Pcs 7 Plastic packet 20litter Pcs 10 Plastic chair Pcs 9 Plastic table Pcs 3 Box file Pcs 8 Marker Pcs 15 Clip bonds Pcs 14 Stapler Pcs 7 Staples Box 8 Pens Pcs 26 Scissors- small Pcs 8 Note book A5 Pcs 8 Sheet Protector Pcs 500 Tea spoons Pcs 30 Hight board Pcs 2 Plastic mates Pcs 3 Bed sheets Pcs 7 Pillows Pcs 7 Popo Pcs 7 Plastic plates Pcs 10 Broom Pcs 2 Clamay brush Pcs 2 Body soap Pcs 20 Metalic basin Pcs 1 OMO powder Box 1 box Other major deliverables (indicate type and number)

60

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

MERCY Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark CORP - 332 Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct beneficiaries 21,007 12,907 SAM children treated Number 200 209 SAM cases with complication treated Number MAM children treated Number 2,065 1,484 Girls Boys Pregnant and nursing mothers treated Number 451 1,121 RUTF/plumpy nut distributed Metric Tones Famix/CSB distributed Metric Tones from HRF's Central Procurement facility from other source (indicate source) Oil distributed (indicate source) Number Mobile health clinics established Number 12 19 Health Extension Workers trained Number 36 12

Health GOAL - 258 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Accomplishment Remark Total beneficiaries Number of Households 1,907 1,907 4780 are Female Number of Insecticide Treated Net (ITN) Number 1,907 1,907 distributed Number of health extension workers trained Number 32 Female 18 18 Trained on Treatment and Prevention of AWD Male 14 14 Other major deliverables (indicate type and number) SC US - Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Accomplishment Remark 269 Total beneficiaries No of direct beneficiaries 10,432 34,377 Women 2,820 12,247

61

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Girls 3,208 10,843 Men 0 0 Boys 10,432 34,377 Number of emergency drug kits distributed Number 5 5 Number of mobile health clinics established Number 23 21 Number of mobile health workers trained Number 25 25 Female 2 2 Male 23 23 Number of health extension workers trained Number 494 334

WASH GOAL - Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark 258 Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of 1,907 1,907 Households Aqua tabs No of tabs 57,210 57,210 Water points rehabilitated (indicate the type Number 2 2 One Pipe Extension and One eg. hand dug well, bore whole, birka etc...) replacement of hand pump Number of institutional latrines maintained Number 3 3 Pit Latrine construction in 3 Kebeles Number of jerry cans distributed Number 3,814 3814 1907 20Lt and 1907 10Lt capacity Jerry Cans distributed for 1907 HHs Number of bars of soap distributed Number 9,535 9535 5 Soaps per HH and 1907 HHs addressed Number of WASH committee Number 20 sensitized/trained Male 13 13 Female 7 7 CLTS Training Provided Number 100 Male Number 43 43 Female Number 57 57

62

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

HELPAGE Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark - 259 Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of 576 576 Households Female headed households 163 Male headed households 413 Teff seed distributed Quintal 97.5 85 197 HHs supported Farm tools purchased and distributed Number (Shovel & 379 379 (indicate type of tools) Pick axe) GOAL - Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark 260 Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 39,962 33,055 beneficiaries Aqua tabs Strips 9,000 9,000 other (indicate type and amount) Liters of water treated using the above Liters 1,800,000 1,800,000 1 tab cleans 20 Liters of mentioned water treatment chemicals water Liters of water distributed Liters 22,165,000/month 38,344,400 Water was delivered to the beneficiaries for 232 days

Number of water tanks distributed Number 38 28 Number of Water Monitors Trained Number 8 Male 4 Female 4 Number of Community Groups trained on Number 123 water treatment Male 62 Female 61 MERCY Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark CORPS - Accomplishment 261 Total beneficiaries No of direct 22,000 135,546 beneficiaries Liters of water distributed Liters 2,017,000 Number of water tanks distributed Number 77

63

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

COOPI - Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark 262 Accomplishment WASH Total beneficiaries No 169,141 205,564 Water tabs No of tabs 90,000 90,000 Liters of water treated using the above Liters 18,000,000 18,000,000 no verification assessment mentioned water treatment chemicals carried out Water points rehabilitated (indicate the type Number 6 HDW, 2 Borehole 6 HDW, 2 Borehole eg. hand dug well, bore whole, birka etc...) Number of expansion works of water points Number 1 Water distribution 1 Water distribution (pipe line extension) system system Liters of water distributed Liters - 9,190,000 Number of water tanks distributed Number 55 55 Number of WASH committee Number 8 8 sensitized/trained OXFAM Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark GB - 264 Accomplishment Total beneficiaries 16,000 32,800 aqua tabs 73,700 73,700 Liters of water treated using the above Liters 2,480,000 5,160,500 mentioned water treatment chemicals Liters of water distributed Liters 2,542,000 5,160,500 Number of WASH committee Number 10 40 sensitized/trained Male 6 24 Female 4 16 CHF - 265 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 73,265 107,334 beneficiaries Women Water tabs No of tabs 200,000 167,811 Water points rehabilitated (indicate the type Number 15 shallow wells 10 shallow wells eg. hand dug well, bore whole, birka etc...) Water points constructed (indicate the type Number 3 birka 6 birka eg. hand dug well, borehole, birka etc...)

64

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Liters of water distributed Liters 6,000,000 5,446,000 Number of water tanks distributed Number 600 389 Number of WASH committee Number 52 52 sensitized/trained Male 312 312 Female 312 312 HELPAGE Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark - 267 Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 2,400 24,00 beneficiaries Water points rehabilitated (indicate the type Number of ponds 12 14 through cash.food for work by eg. hand dug well, bore whole, birka etc...) the 2400 targeted beneficiaries SC US - Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark 269 Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 10,432 34,377 beneficiaries Women 2,820 12,247 Girls 3,208 10,843 Men 0 0 Boys 3,253 11,287 SAM children treated Number 1,086 2,341 Girls 532 1,012 Boys 554 1,329 SAM cases with complication treated Number 110 231 Girls 53 109 Boys 57 122 MAM children treated Number 5,265 9,059 Girls 2,623 4,502 Boys 2,642 4,557 Pregnant and nursing mothers treated Number 2,820 8,807 RUTF/plumpy nut distributed Metric Tones Famix/CSB distributed Metric Tones 188.2 131 57.2 MT from SC UK & SC

65

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

from HRF's Central Procurement facility Italy fund from other source (indicate source) Oil distributed (indicate sourse) Number 20.3 53 33.3 MT from SC Italy & SC UK fund Mobile health clinics established Number 23 21 Health Extension Workers trained Number 191 187 IMC 270 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Girls Number 565 1,491 Boys Number 565 1,279 Girls NA 116 Boys NA 97 MAM children treated Number IMC provided supplementary food for non-EOS Girls 1,232 1,029 beneficiaries Boys 1,232 843 Pregnant and nursing mothers treated Number 1,199 1,966 RUTF/plumpy nut distributed Metric Tones NA NA from other source (indicate source) MT 392.6 MT 77,438.45 KG Oil distributed (indicate source) Number 42.2 MT 8,478.4 KG The remaining balance handed over for DPPO Mobile health clinics established Number 18 26 Male 0 148 212 refresher training and 36 basic training Female OTP/SC sites received NFIs (indicate type) Number 85 85 Other major deliverables (indicate type and 30 Food distribution number) agents, 33 health professionals and 74 community volunteers received trainings

66

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

ACF - 274 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 24,700 55,520 beneficiaries Women 4,450 10,004 Girls 6,146 13,814 Men 5,924 13,315 Boys 8,180 18,387 Wuhagar Bottles 10,000 9,200 Early termination of water rationing due to rains accounts for the difference. Water tabs No of tabs Liters of water distributed Liters 387,800 10,375,000 DRC - 275 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 53,047 12,595 Intervention was reduced due beneficiaries to sufficiency of rainfall

Water points rehabilitated (indicate the type Number no specific indicator 1 One borehole maintained in eg. hand dug well, bore whole, birka etc...) Juug, which is the primary water source for Mohammed- Ali community. Liters of water distributed Liters 17,712,600 2,708,000 Intervention was reduced due to sufficiency of rainfall

SC US - Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark 276 Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 136,533 111,537 beneficiaries Women 37,546 30,672 Girls 30,106 24,595 Men 37,546 30,672 Boys 31,334 25,598 Pur Sachets _ 161,537 Liters of water treated using the above Liters _ 1,615,370 mentioned water treatment chemicals

67

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Number of community level water schemes Number N/A N/A treated Water points rehabilitated (indicate the type Number 4 4 eg. hand dug well, bore whole, birka etc...) Liters of water distributed Liters _ 2,380,000 Number of WASH committee Number _ 118 sensitized/trained Male _ 79 Female _ 39 ISLAMIC Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark RELIEF - Accomplishment 277 Total beneficiaries No. of direct 149,854 94,575 The original plan for water beneficiaries trucking in this program was to cover 68 villages in 6 districts with a total of 22,478,100 litter of water. However due to the involvement Intermon Oxfam in the same area (Gorobaqaqsa and Guradhamole) IR has reduced the number of intervene kebeles from 68 to 34 in 4 districts (Hargele, Chertie, Elkere and Kersdulla) which resulted to reduce the number of beneficiaries and amount of water distributed. Women 83,918 52,962 Men 65,936 41,613 Wuhagar Bottles 56,000 56,000 Liters of water treated using the above Liters 22,478,100 6,648,000 mentioned water treatment chemicals Liters of water distributed Liters 22,478,100 6,648,000 Number of water tanks distributed Number 20 20 Number of bars of soap distributed Number 56,000 56,000

68

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Number of WASH committee Number 170 A total of 170 people are sensitized/trained selected from the 34 distribution site (5 members in each distribution site) and training is provided for all of the committee members. This training also done at water distribution site while water distribution is carried out. Male 136 Female 34 Other major deliverables (indicate type and pieces 10,000 10,000 The IEC materials used for number) IEC materials for health education promotional and education purpose work is provided by UNICEF

SC US - Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark 278 Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 71,548 69,678 beneficiaries Women 20,926 19,161 Girls 15,208 15,678 Men 20,926 19,161 Boys 15,828 15,678 Pur Sachets _ 54,900 Liters of water treated using the above Liters _ 549,000 mentioned water treatment chemicals Water points rehabilitated (indicate the type Number 7 7 eg. hand dug well, bore whole, birka etc...) Liters of water distributed Liters _ 2,250,000 Number of WASH committee Number _ 153 sensitized/trained Male _ 92 Female _ 61 Other major deliverables

69

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

SC US - Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark 279 Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No. of direct 56,640 72,888 beneficiaries Women 72,798 20,926 Girls 15,576 15,208 Men 15,576 20,926 Boys 12,999 15,828 Household water treatment chemicals N/A distributed Pur Sachets _ 31,680 other (indicate type and amount) Liters of water treated using the above Liters _ 316,800 mentioned water treatment chemicals Water points rehabilitated (indicate the type Number 7 7 eg. hand dug well, bore whole, birka etc...) Liters of water distributed Liters _ 6,340,000 Number of WASH committee Number _ 137 sensitized/trained Male _ 82 Female _ 55 OXFAM Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark GB - 280 Accomplishment Total beneficiaries 32,800 8706 Liters of water treated using the above Liters 995,000 995,000 mentioned water treatment chemicals Liters of water distributed Liters 995,000 995,000 IRC - 281 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 62,116 62,116 The project targeted drought- beneficiaries affected communities in three woredas in Degehabur and Jijiga Zones in the Somali Region of Ethiopia

70

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Water points rehabilitated (indicate the type Number 4 3 motorized water The IRC completed the eg. hand dug well, bore whole, birka etc...) schemes rehabilitation of Sheik Dawale, Lefaise, and Tawlane water schemes and the water schemes and Falfal was not achieved due to insecurity in the area. Number GIS maps on rehabilitated water Number 4 3 The IRC GIS team produced systems and structures three maps on rehabilitated water systems and structures. The map for Falfal was not achieved due to insecurity in the area. Number of woreda water office(WWO) WWO 3 3 Contributed to the supported sustainability of the rehabilitated and expanded water schemes. The IRC worked with the woreda water office when conducting electro-mechanical works, well development, and water management committee trainings. IMC - 283 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Water tabs/ Aqua tabs No of tabs 15,400 people 15,400 people

Water points rehabilitated (indicate the type Number 1 motorized well and 1 motorized well and eg. hand dug well, bore whole, birka etc...) 3 shallow/ hand dug 1 shallow/ hand dug well wells maintained

Liters of water distributed Liters 300 cubic meter 90 cubic meter IMC did not continue the water rationing after August 2011 due to adequate rain fall in the target woredas during the project period.

Number of water tanks distributed Number 13 13 Number of jerry cans distributed Number 618 618

71

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark SSA - 286 Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of Households 3,910 Female headed households 2,500 Male headed households Target livestock for survival feed Number of Livestock 20,000 26,945 Target livestock for supplementary feed Number of Livestock 2,500 2,500 HH received animal 3,910 feed for 3 months and 1,410 HH received it for 1 month

Number of animal treated/dewormed (indicate Number 20,000 26,945 Cattle and camels were also type) treated in addition to goats Number of trained animal health workers Number 22 None Not included in the project Other major deliverables (indicate type and number) Cash for work activities for birkut construction Number of 750 990 340 HH participated in birkut Households excavation while 650 HH Cash for work activities for rural access road Number of worked on rural access road construction Households construction. IMC - 287 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct In WASH sector, 80 beneficiaries community volunteers Women Number 112 CV+HEWs 112 CV+HEWs trained, 16 school WASH clubs established, 5 VIP Girls Number NA laterines constructed and Men Number 8EHWs 8 environmental 3,585 households reached health workers with hygiene and sanitation Boys Number NA messages Number of institutional latrines maintained Number 5 5 5 VIP latrines constructed at five health posts Number of water tanks distributed Number 5 5 5 water tanker installed at 5 helath posts Number of hand wash facility constructed Number 5 5 5 hand washing facilities constructed with VIP latrines in 5 health posts

Male 16 16 Members of 16 school WASH

72

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Female club sensitized Other major deliverables (indicate type and number) OXFAM Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark GB - 299 Accomplishment Liters of water distributed Liters 687,780 123,231 This is a daily delivered quantity Number of water tanks distributed Number Number of jerry cans (20 Lit) distributed Number 1,986 1,986 OXFAM Total beneficiaries No of direct 46,440 46,440 CANADA - beneficiaries 300 Water tabs Sachets 19,200 19,200 Bishangari cartoon 99 99 Chlorine Kg 200 200 Water points rehabilitated (motorized Number 3 to 6 5 scheme) Water points rehabilitated (traditional water Number 2 3 well-ella) Water points rehabilitated (pond) Number 1 1 Water points rehabilitated (hand pump Number 2 2 delivered) Water points constructed (generator house) Number 1 Number of expansion works of water points Number 3 to 6 3 (pipe line extension) Number of Household latrines constructed Number 40 Liters of water distributed Liters 7,650,000 2,295,000 Number of water tanks distributed Number 6 6 Number of jerry cans distributed Number 5,000 6,400 Number of WASH committee committee 10 13 sensitized/trained Male Number 30 59 Female Number 40 40

73

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

IMC - 305 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 11,209 9,366 beneficiaries Women 2,673 3,820 Girls 4,268 2,996 Boys 4,268 2,550 Household water treatment chemicals 11,209 9,366 distributed Water tabs/ Aqua tabs No of tabs 105 HPs 22,060 Unspecified 3 3 Sex segregated latrine blocks at health posts

Number of water tanks distributed Number 6 6 Number of bars of soap distributed Number NA 6,624 pcs Number of WASH committee Number 6 10 10 School WASH club sensitized/trained sensitized SC UK - Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark 307 Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Person 16,000 16,000 Women 7,250 7,250 Girls 750 750 Men 7,250 7,250 Boys 750 750 Pur Sachets 151,200 151,200 other (indicate type and amount) drum 2 2 Liters of water treated using the above Liters 1,512,000 1,512,000 mentioned water treatment chemicals Number of community level water schemes Number 31 31 treated Water points rehabilitated (indicate the type Number 13 13 eg. hand dug well, bore whole, birka etc...) Water points constructed (indicate the type Number 18 18 eg. hand dug well, bore whole, birka etc...)

74

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Liters of water distributed Liters 2,250,000 816,000 Number of water tanks distributed Number 225 102

Number of jerry cans distributed Number 2,400 2,400 Number of hand wash facility constructed Number 5 5 Number of bars of soap distributed Number 25,200 25,200 Number of WASH committee Number 106 106 sensitized/trained Male 50 50 Female 56 56 PCI - 311 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries # of persons 80,000 14,530hhs 72,650 Women 12,782 11,503 Girls 23,738 21,690 Men 15,218 13,696 Boys 28,262 25,761 Household water treatment chemicals distributed Pur Sachets 650,000 sachets 336,000 Liters of water treated using the above Liters 6,500,000 mentioned water treatment chemicals 3,360,000 Number of community level water schemes Number 0 0 treated Number of water points identified for Based on 27 maintenance assessment Water points rehabilitated (indicate the Number 18 15 3 borehole and 12 hand dug typeeg. hand dug well, bore whole, birka well etc...) Water points constructed (indicate the type Number 0 1 Hand dug well eg. hand dug well, bore whole, birka) Number of expansion works of water points Number 0 4 1905 meter (pipe line extension)

75

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Number of Household latrines constructed Number 0 535 in female headed households 0 70 in male headed households 465 Number of water tanks distributed Number 0 1 Fiber glass Number of jerry cans and Beckets distributed Number NS 800 buckets NS= Not specified Number of hand wash facility constructed Number 0 535 Number of WASH committee Number NS 285 Committee members sensitized/trained Male 128 Female 157 Other major deliverables (indicate type and number) Total number of water testing focal person NS 114 Community level trained in project operational woredas Total number of soap procured and 24,000 distributed 8,500.00 Total number of awareness raising sessions NS conducted at community level on community 4,700.00 hygiene and sanitation practices

Total number of sensitization meetings NS conducted on waste disposal at the 3,500.00 community level Total number of functional rubbish burning 2,000.00 535 pits developed at HH level Total number of Health Extension workers NS 65 and health promoters trained in AWD early Prevention, early detection and referral system Total number of health professionals trained 33 in AWD case management Total number of Joint monitoring visits 6 6 /supportive supervisions conducted to operational woredas

76

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

GOAL - Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark 322 Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 51,026 51,026 beneficiaries Aqua tabs No of tabs 336,000 Liters of water treated using the above Liters 6,720,000 1 tab cleans 20 Liters of mentioned water treatment chemicals water Liters of water distributed Liters 15,307,920 8,986,000 Rain started earlier than expected hence water was distributed for 41 days

Number of water tanks distributed Number 25 25 CHF - 325 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 93,375 42,539 The water trucking stopped beneficiaries due to rain Water tabs No of tabs 200,000 200,000 Water points rehabilitated (indicate the type Number 12 shallow wells 12 eg. hand dug well, bore whole, birka etc...) Water points constructed (indicate the type Number 5 birka 5 ongoing eg. hand dug well, bore whole, birka etc...) Liters of water distributed Liters 10,800,000 2,448,000 The water trucking conducted only for 17 days Number of water tanks distributed Number 600 136 Number of WASH committee Number 54 34 sensitized/trained Male 324 204 Female 324 204

Livestock HELPAGE Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark - 259 Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of Households 1,083 1,083 Female headed households 1,083 1,083

77

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Number of animal restocked (indicate type) Number (sheep and 3790 2,166,000 birr delivered to the Goats) beneficiaries and each HH bought from 3 to 4 shoats

COOPI - Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark 262 Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of Households 32,770 54,331 Female headed households Male headed households Number of animal treated/dewormed Number 218,214 388,087 (indicate type) Number of animal vaccinated (indicate Number 568,257 199,451 type) Other major deliverables (rehabilitation of 2 2 pond for animal) HELPAGE Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark - 266 Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of Households 2,400 2,400 Female headed households Male headed households Target livestock for survival feed Number of Livestock 566 566 core breeding cattle Bales of hay distributed Bales of Hay 3,400 Quintal of concentrate purchased and Quintals 60 distributed Number of animal destocked for meat Number 352 352 cattle from 352 HHs distribution (indicate type) WORLD Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark VISION - Accomplishment 271 Total beneficiaries Number of Households 5,000 4,474 89% Female headed households 2,550 2,371 93% Male headed households 2,450 2,103 86% Target livestock for survival feed Number of Livestock 9,000 9,000 100% Target livestock for supplementary feed Number of Livestock 9,000 9,000 100% Bales of hay distributed Bales of Hay 35,600 20,836 59%

78

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Quintal of concentrate purchased and Quintals 8,500 5,789 68% distributed Number of animal treated/dewormed Number 100,000 139,518 140% (indicate type) Number of animal vaccinated (indicate Number 100,000 308,700 309% type) Number of animal destocked for meat Number 5,000 4,474 89% distribution (indicate type) Number of trained animal health workers Number 40 39 98% Other major deliverables (indicate type and number) CARE - Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark 272 Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of Households 11,475 7,844 Female headed households 3,263 Male headed households 4,581 Target livestock for survival feed Number of Livestock 3,875 6,657 Quintal of concentrate purchased and Quintals 3,487.5 6,238.7 distributed Number of animal destocked for meat Number 1,275 2,219 Out of the total slaughtered distribution (indicate type) cattle only 686 were consumed

SSA - 286 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of Households 3,910 Female headed households 2,500 Male headed households Target livestock for survival feed Number of Livestock 20,000 26,945 Target livestock for supplementary feed Number of Livestock 2,500 2,500 HH received animal 3,910 feed for 3 months and 1,410 HH received it for 1 month

79

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Number of animal treated/dewormed Number 20,000 26,945 Cattle and camels were also (indicate type) treated in addition to goats

Number of trained animal health workers Number 22 None Not included in the project Cash for work activities for birkut Number of Households 750 990 340 HH participated in birkut construction excavation while 650 HH Cash for work activities for rural access Number of Households worked on rural access road road construction construction. OXFAM Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark CAN - 306 Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of Households 11,015 11,015 Female headed households 3,565 3,565 Male headed households 7,450 7,450 Number of animal treated/dewormed Number 76,500 Cattle) 76,500 Number of animal treated/dewormed Number 61,200 (Shoat) 61,200 Number of animal vaccinated (Shoat) Number - 145,496 Number of trained animal health workers Number 16 (Animal Health Assistance (AHA)) 16 Number of trained animal health workers Number 32 (Community Animal Health Workers 32 (CAHWs)) Cash injection through Cash for Work Birr 6,713,392 activity for 3365 HHs 6,862,418

Seed GOAL 258 Measurable Indicators Unit of Project Plan Project Remark Measurement Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of Some of the seeds were Households unavailable in the market hence Female headed households 956 956 were replaced in discussion with woreda officials. Male headed households 951 951 Wheat seed distributed Quintal 446.25 0 In replacement of the unavailable seeds in the market Maize seed distributed Quintal 87.5 96 e.g. soya bean, haricot bean

80

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Dap fertilizer distributed Quintal 953.5 384 and peanuts, and in line with the woreda office request an Urea fertilizer distributed Quintal 476.7 384 additional 1,907Pcs of bill-hook Farming Forks Number 3,814 3,814 (sickle) Alben and 1,907Pcs Harar pick axe were procured Hoes Number 1,907 1,907 and distributed to the resettled Pick Axes Number 1,907 1,907 population. Sickle Number 1,907 1,907 Machetes Number 1907 1,907 Sorghum seed distributed Quintal 85 0 Haricot Bean seed distributed Quintal 250 0 Seasam seed distributed Quintal 150 0 Millet Seed distributed Quintal 0 57.8 Rice Seed distributed Quintal 0 140

HELPAGE - Measurable Indicators Unit of Project Plan Project 259 Measurement Accomplishment Remark Total beneficiaries Number of 576 576 Households Female headed households 163 Male headed households 413 Teff seed distributed Quintal 97.5 85 197 HHs supported Farm tools purchased and distributed Number (Shovel & 379 379 (indicate type of tools) Pick axe) FAO - 298 Measurable Indicators Unit of Project Plan Project Remark Measurement Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of 42,604 Households Female headed households Male headed households Pesticide distributed Litter 8,240 8,240 33 woredas Number agricultural extension workers Number 177 trained Other major deliverables personal set 12 12 Eight types, 9600 pcs protective equipment

81

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Number of participants in workshop and Number 77 conferences Number of field days organised Number 10 6 1890 participants attended

FAO - 314 Measurable Indicators Unit of Project Plan Project Remark Measurement Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of 5673 6100 Additional 720 HHs will be Households benefited Female headed households 929 Male headed households 5171 Haricot bean seed distributed Quintal 60 60 Lentils distributed Quintal Sweet potato cuttings distributed Number 5,400,450 5,431,000 Additional 1 million will be distributed Fodder seed distributed Quintal Total land covered Hectare 158 159 CARE - 315 Measurable Indicators Unit of Project Plan Project Remark Measurement Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of 6,240 5,546 Households Female headed households 253 Male headed households 5,293 Chickpea distributed Quintal 1,560 1,386.5 1360 Quintal of Haricot bean was planned but planting window was over Total land covered Hectare 1,560 1,386.5 CRS - 316 Measurable Indicators Unit of Project Plan Project Remark Measurement Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of 4,860 8,531 Households Female headed households 8,383 Male headed households 148 Chickpea distributed Quintal 1,215 834 Potato tubers quintals 111 Total land covered Hectare 1,215 1,046.6

82

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

NFI CONCERN Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark 294 Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of Households 43 HHs and 158 family members=201 people

Female headed households 10 10 Male headed households 33 33 Child headed households 0 0 Blankets pcs 129 On average 3/family Plastic sheet roll 4 400m/roll- 2m/person Shelter materials (indicate type and number) Jerry can pcs 86 20 lit - 2/household plates, plastics pcs 201 1/person Cups, plastics pcs 201 1/person Jugs, plastics pcs 43 1/household Cooking pot pcs 86 2/household Plastic buckets Number 86 2/household Plastic bowels Number 86 2/household CI-sheet (corrugated iron) Number 860 20/household Roofing nails Packet 22 1/2 packet/household Note - 12.06Mt grain (sorghum) and 804 liters of oil were also provided to these 43 HHs (fire victims) as part of the NFI distribution - 15kg grain and 1 lit oil/p/m for 4 months

OXFAM CAN Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark - 300 Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of Households 6,400 6,400 Female headed households Child headed households Jerry can pcs 6,400 6,400

83

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Protection IOM - 273 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 2,400 2,417 beneficiaries Women 28 Girls 11 Men 1,878 Boys 500 IOM - 295 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Accomplishment Remark Total beneficiaries No of direct 1,100 1,583 beneficiaries Women 36 Girls 2 Men 1,272 Boys 273

Education GOAL - 258 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of Households 1,907 1,907 School Rehabilitation Number of School 1 1 A school and its classrooms rehabilitated

Student Desk provided Number of Desks 209 209

Refugee health IOM - 323 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 18,628 17,539 6000 was targeted for curative, beneficiaries 1200 targeted for specialist doctors, 25% (45712) under health promotion

84

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Women 9,685 Girls 189 Men 5,973 Boys 228 Number of mobile health clinics Number 2 2 2 health posts were established constructed, with attached AWD ward, but not mobile clinics Number of mobile health workers Number 4 trained Total beneficiaries Number 6,000 6,033 Women 2,448 Girls 2,490 Men 596 Boys 499 Total beneficiaries Number 1200 1244 Percentage of population reached by Percentage 25% 22% Total two camp population outreach programs 45712 Total beneficiaries Number 11,428 10,262 Coverage in Number Women 6,924 Girls 3,338 ` Refugee NFI GOAL - 319 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of Households 3,500 3,500 Plastic sheet pcs 10,500 10,500 Soap pcs 17,500 40,900 Items added as per UNHCR Oct 4, 2011 gaps identified, following cost savings on procured items and transport

Basins, plastic pcs

85

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

plates, plastics pcs 17,500 17,500 Cups, plastics pcs 17,500 17,500 Cooking pot pcs 7,000 7,000 Ladles, aluminum pcs 3,500 3,500 Mosquito net pcs 7,000 15,326 Items added as per UNHCR Oct 4, 2011 gaps identified, following cost savings on procured items and transport Sanitary kits Number 3,500 28,500 Items added as per UNHCR Oct 4, 2011 gaps identified, following cost savings on procured items and transport Women Underwear Number 10,500 35,500 Items added as per UNHCR Oct 4, 2011 gaps identified, following cost savings on procured items and transport

Spoons pcs 17,500 17,500 Knives pcs 3,500 3,500 UNHCR - 327 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of Households 5000 HHs (20,000 5000 HHs (20,000 indv.) indv.)

Child headed households Blankets pcs 9,921 9,921 Plastic sheet pcs 7,000 7,000 Shelter materials (indicate type and number) Jerry can (20 litres) pcs 7,500 7,500 Soap pcs 46,000 46,000 Bucket 15 litres Pcs 7,053 7,053 Kitchen set type B Set 3,000 3,000 Sleeping mat Pcs 6,235 6,235

86

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Mosquito net pcs 10,000 10,000 Sanitary kits Number 20,700 20,700 Underwear for women (3 per person for 6 months) 13,800 13,800 Tent Pcs 600 600

Refugee WASH IRC - 301 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 20,000 25,902 At the time of proposal beneficiaries development, the IRC was targeting an anticipated influx of 20,000 refugees in Kobe Camp. By the end of the project period in November 2011, the refugee population in the camp had increased to 25,902. Women > 18 years of age; UNHCR 5,231 2011 November population data Girls < 18 years of age; UNHCR 8,202 2011 November population data Men > 18 years of age; UNHCR 3,539 2011 November population data Boys < 18 years of age; UNHCR 8,930 2011 November population data Number of community level water Number 1 1 IRC installed a temporary schemes treated water treatment plant in Kobe Camp and provided safe and clean water to the camp residents on a daily basis through water trucking.

87

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Water points constructed (indicate the Number 4 8 The IRC installed eight type temporary water distribution eg. hand dug well, bore whole, birka points (tap stands) in Kobe etc...) Camp in August 2011, bringing the total number of water points in the camp to 26. Number of expansion works of water Number 1 1 Completed the installation of a points (pipe line extension) 4.5km supply line to the camp in October 2011.

Liters of water distributed Liters 15 liters per person 14 liters per person The IRC was able to maintain per day per day a water supply of 11-15 l/p/d for the Kobe Camp population throughout the project period, with around 14 l/p/d supplied by the end of the project period in November 2011. Number of water tanks distributed Number 9 13 Two 75m3 clear water wells, three 50m3 onion tanks for flocculation/sedimentation, and eight 10m3 Roto tanks for temporary distribution points procured and installed.

Number of jerry cans distributed Number 4,000 4,000 4,000 jerry cans procured in September 2011. 2,800 were distributed within the project period. The remaining jerry cans have been distributed since the end of the project period. All were distributed targeting vulnerable and female-headed households in Kobe Camp. OXFAM GB - Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark 313 Accomplishment Total beneficiaries 28,500 26,813 Household water treatment chemicals distributed Pur Sachets 38,400 38,400 Liters of water treated using the above Liters 1,116,000 1,116,000 mentioned water treatment chemicals

88

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Water points constructed (indicate the Number 1 water treatment 1 (treatment plant to type eg. hand dug well, bore whole, plant, 6 jet wells, 3 serve 30,000 people), birka etc...) boreholes 8 jet wells, 5 boreholes

Number of Household latrines Number 3,052 3,424 constructed Liters of water distributed Liters 1,116,000 1,116,000 Number of water tanks distributed Number 8 8 Number of hand wash facility Number 300 300 constructed Number of bars of soap (205 Kg) Number 49,030 distributed Number of WASH committee Number 300 213 sensitized/trained Oxfam bucket with tap Number 4,903 4,903 Oxfam bucket without tap Number 4,903 4,903 Plastic Basin Number 9,806 9,806 Absorbant cloth Number 9,806 9,806 Family shower Number 5,000 3,162 Garbage pit Number 600 535

Refugee Nutrition SC US - 328 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 14,454 10,821 beneficiaries Women 1,885 1,150 Girls 6,284 4,921 Men 0 0 Boys 6,285 4,750 SAM children treated Number 1,124 0 MAM children treated + BSFP Number 11,445 9,671 Girls 5,722 4,921 Boys 5,723 4,750

89

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Pregnant and nursing mothers treated Number 1,885 1,150 GOAL 331 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 16,336 1358 beneficiaries MAM children treated Number Targeting was not sex segregated as the project objective is to treat all malnourished children of refugees that come to the screening center. However, in order to analyze which sex is more vulnerable to malnourishment, sex segregated results are being collected Girls Number 8,283 269 Boys Number 274 Blanket Supplementary Feeding 10,981 Female 9,151 279 Note that 2,928 MAM children under 5 have been also included under the blanket feeding Male 423 Pregnant and nursing mothers treated Number 1,830 113

Refugee Shelter NRC - 309 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remarks Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of direct 16,700 8,535 Almost 50% of the target beneficiaries beneficiaries have been reached. The remaining will largely be covered with available emergency tents and ongoing transitional shelter construction

90

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Women Number of Women 8,600 2,448 Majority of refugees in Dolo beneficiaries Ado camps are female headed households, hence more women were reached under this project Girls Number of Girls 3,800 2,744 beneficiaries Men Number of Men 1,700 1,064 beneficiaries Boys Number of Boys 2,600 2,279 beneficiaries Total number of Emergency tents Number of emergency 2,200 1,407 Remaining tents to be distributed tents distributed distributed in Buramino refugee camp to the new arrivals Total number of Transitional shelters Number of Transitional 1,600 300 In the remaining project period, constructed Shelters constructed doubled shelter construction speed will ensure completion of the project Total number of persons trained in tent Number of Persons 100 80 Additional manpower is being erection trained in tent erection trained to ensure increased shelter construction before end of project

Common Services UNHAS - 282 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remarks Accomplishment Users' organizations No. of Organizations 35 agencies 60 agencies The significant increase from the plan was due to the arrival of large numberof refuge in Somali region Passengers No. of Passengers 350 passengers/ 523 passengers Month /Month Cargo Kg of cargo 2000kg/Month 2436kg/Month Medical Evacuation percentage of Medical 100% 100% evacuations Utelization of contracted hours percentage of Hours 100% 162% flown Destinations Served Number of destinations 7 7 served

91

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

UNDSS-320 Measurable Indicator Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total Beneficiary Number of Agencies All UN/INGO in All UN/INGO in project Areas project areas benefited

Incidents responded to Number of Incidents Not defined. This 77 security incidents Thirty-six (47%) of the incidents cannot be involving UN and are Road Traffic Accidents. determined. NGO staff members Theft, street robbery, house attended to during the break-ins flooding are additional period and will incidents attended during this continue as reports period. received.

Security Assessment Conducted Number of Generally 141 field Accordingly area specific SOPs, Assessments missions conducted Area Security Plans and SRAs in 86 locations for the were reviewed. Depending on purpose of security the situation travel restrictions in assessments to some parts were relaxed. facilitate humanitarian Training and installation of operation in the area communication carried out. and this will continue Security assessments are still in the coming months. ongoing in project areas.

Training Conducted Number of Training At least five to ten Nine security related Besides, 1688 staff members trainings to be trainings conducted in attended UNDSS regular conducted 9 locations. 313 UN security awareness briefing in and INGO staff different parts of the country. members participated UNDSS is conducting the in these trainings. regular briefing for all staff Security Level travelling to the field and also System, basic HF and those operating from project VHF radio sites to other locations in the communication, Road region. Safety trainings, security guard training & ASC and SWG workshop are among the trainings provided. This will continue in the coming months too.

92

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

Field Authorization Received Number of Access Not defined. Based 16, 083 security In addition, in Somali Region, Authorizations on Agency needs clearance requests the LSAs and FSCO deployed processed during this in the area occasionally seek period and this will and process travel authorization continue in the future from the military commanders on daily bases. mainly for the conflict areas of the region as required.

Missions Tracked Number of mission Not defined. Based Movement of 6145 of Field missions are tracked by tracked on agency field UN vehicles (field the base radios in project areas. mission plans missions) tracked during this period and will continue tracking by all available means of communication.

Security Surveys Number of Surveys Not defined 29 office and 126 In addition, surveys of hotels Based on the request residential security and private security companies from the UN surveys conducted were conducted in some of the organizations and and will continue project areas. staff members conducting surveys

Published Weekly Security Reports Number of Weekly Weekly security 288 weekly security Ten security advisories were reports reports are required reports were issued in the project areas. from field offices published in the project areas and this will continue every week. Area Security Management Number of ASMT Weekly ASMT A total of 216 ASMT Occasionally extraordinary Team(ASMT) meeting takes place meetings were held in ASMT meeting will take place in in most locations and the project areas. case of changes in the security Monthly ASMT in few situation in a given area when areas necessary.

Communication Number of Not defined Two HF base radios Besides, call signs allocated for Communalization (Jijiga and Shire) and staff members of different UN Equipment 101 mobile VHF/HF organizations. Installed/Programmed radios installed and programmed In addition, seven VHF/HF radios

93

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011

dismantled from vehicles as per the request of UN agencies, programmes and funds.

94