1 DRC Protection Assessment Report in IDP Sites in Afder Zone October

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 DRC Protection Assessment Report in IDP Sites in Afder Zone October DRC Protection assessment Report in IDP sites in Afder Zone October 2018 1 Contents 1. Introduction ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------3 2. Scope of the assessment -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 3. Objective of the assessment ---------------------------------------------------------------------4 3.1 General Objectives--------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 3.2 Specific Objectives------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------4 4. Composition of the Assessment team---------------------------------------------------------- -4 5. Ethical considerations -----------------------------------------------------------------------------5 6. Methodology and assessment tools---------------------------------------------------------------5 7. Major challenges during assessment-------------------------------------------------------------6 8. Key Findings----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7 8.1 Bare 01 IDP site ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------7 8.2 Den Adine IDP site ----------------------------------------------------------------------------10 8.3 Weydkal IDP site ------------------------------------------------------------------------------10 8.4 Allana IDP site ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------12 8.5 Darso IDP site-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------14 8.6 Waldaye Gebare IDP site ---------------------------------------------------------------------16 8.7 Koraley IDP site --------------------------------------------------------------------------------18 9. Conclusions---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------21 10. Recommendations: -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------22 2 1. Introduction The Danish Refugee Council (DRC) is an international non-governmental organization, which has been providing relief and development services in the Horn of Africa since 1997. DRC is currently implementing a range of activities across Ethiopia and Djibouti, including WASH and shelter provision, child and youth protection, gender-based violence prevention and response, awareness raising on migration risks, protection monitoring and livelihoods support for returning migrants or those at-risk of migration. People have been displaced due to conflict and drought in the Somali Region. According to DTM round 12, a total of 1,091,210 people has been displaced and living in 385 sites in Somali region. Among those sites, 168 sites are conflict-induced IDPs and 206 are due to periodic drought occurred in the region. Out of those 64,571 people have been displaced and living in 31 sites in Afder Zone. The reason of displacement for 26 of the sites was drought, for 3 sites seasonal flood and 2 sites conflict. The IDPs have lost most of their livestock and almost all their resources because of the drought. The IDPs in Afder and Liben Zone are underserved compared to the IDPs in Fafan Zone as DRC protection team has observed. To respond to the unmet humanitarian needs in Afder and Liben Zone, DRC has conducted a multi- sectoral assessment in 7 IDP sites in Afder Zone. The main purpose of this assessment was to identify the protection needs, risks and coping mechanisms that exist within the displaced community in Dollobay and Bare woreda. The findings from this assessment can serve as an important source for humanitarian actors that have or are planning to have interventions in the region. 2. Scope of the Assessment Afder Zone consists of ten woredas including Dollo Bay & Bare woredas. There are 9 IDP sites in Bare woreda. According to DTM 12, Weydkal, Bare 01kebele and Dana -Adine are the sites with the highest household numbers. The reason for the displacement is drought. In Dollobay woreda, there are only 4 IDP sites, Alan (3707), Darso (5930), Koraley (2240) and Waladaya Gabare (2855) 3 that have high population numbers and have received better humanitarian assistance compared to sites in Bare woreda. The current assessment covers seven (7) drought affected IDP sites in Bare & Dollo Bay Woredas, which are preselected for mobile protection EHF 2018 project. Table 1. Assessed IDP Sites S/n IDP Site Name Kebele Woreda Total HH Total individuals 1. O1 Kebele O1 Kebele Bare 412 2494 2. Weydkal Weydkal Bare 550 3300 3. Allan Allan Dollo Bay 603 3707 4. Darso Darso Dollo Bay 972 5930 5. Waldaye Gabare Waldaye Gabare Dollo Bay 457 2855 6. Koraley Koraley Dollo Bay 367 2240 7. Dana-Adin Dana-Adin Bare 325 1964 3. Objective of the Assessment 3.1 General Objective The general objective of this assessment is: 1. To identify the protection risks and needs of the community. 2. To collect baseline information for EHF 2018 funded project. The finding of the assessment is a determent to select areas of intervention for DRC and to design an appropriate response for the identified protection risks. 3.2 Specific objective 1. To assess the situation of IDPs and its prolonged impact on the life of the displaced people and the host community. 2. To assess the available services and needs for humanitarian assistance. 3. To identify protection risks and concerns, community coping mechanisms and existed networks. 4. To identify the most vulnerable groups of the community. 4. Composition of the assessment team The assessment was conducted between September 3-7, 2018. The assessment team comprised of DRC’s Protection Manager, Senior Protection Officer and 2 Protection Officers as well as the 4 Woreda women and children affairs officer and a representative from the Disaster preparedness and prevention bureau (DPPB). Table2. Name of participants Name Organization Title Solomon Tazeb DRC Protection Manager Mohamed Kalif DRC Senior Protection Officer Hafidha Mohamed DRC Protection Officer Hussein Noor DRC Protection Officer Noor Wali Bare Woreda DPPB Head of DPPB Fartun Abdullahi Farah Bare Woreda WOCAO WOCA Expert Abdirahman Arab Dollo Bay Woreda DPPB Head of DPPB Abdifatah Emi Dollo Bay Woreda DPPB DPPB Expert 5. Ethical Consideration DRC protection staff have conducted a preliminary discussion with Bare & Dollo Bay Woredas Administration Office, WOWCA and DPPO about the overview of the project and the objective of the assessment. As a result, all the duty bearers approved the mission to conduct an assessment in both Woredas and respective IDP sites. Informed consent: Information about the overall project, objective, outcomes and activities of the assessment has been provided to the participants. Ethical data collection: This assessment took into consideration the cultural and socio-political context of Afder zone. Confidentiality: To ensure confidentiality was assured, personal details of respondents are not going to be shared with other agencies. Voluntary participation: The participants were informed that participation in the assessment is voluntary, and that they could withdraw from the discussion at any time. On the same time, they were informed that have the right to refuse to answer a few or all questions. 6. Methodology and Assessment tools To get diverse information about the IDPs, DRC applied the purposive sampling technique. The number of participants, the role of some of the respondents, who should participate (diversity) and the sex of the participants were defined before the assessment. The data collection tools were: A. Semi structured interviews with women and girls. 5 B. Semi-structured interviews with men (Youth, persons with disability, Elders and other). C. Key Informant Interviews with local authorities or religious leaders or community representatives. D. Protection observation Table 3. Total number of participants for all assessment tools Assessment tool Total Total sessions Facilitator participant conducted Semi structured interview with 30 6 Hafida Mohamed IDP women and girls Semi structured interview with 29 6 Hussein Noor IDP men (youth, elders, persons with disability and others) KII (community representatives, 12 6 Mohamed Kalif religious leaders Protection observation - 6 (one for each site) Mohamed Kalif Total 71 7. Major Challenges encountered during the assessment: The road was very challenging to access most of the IDPs sites. There was no network access and light in Afder Zone. Most of IDPs were very discouraged, reflecting a sense of hopelessness and insecurity because of the government change. The IDP communities expressed their dissatisfaction about the constant assessments conducted coupled with limited attention and humanitarian assistance provided in the sites. Almost all the IDPs in Dena Adine moved to other IDP sites and Dollo (Somali) in search of better assistance. 6 8. Key Findings 8.1 Bare 01 Bare woreda is 105 KM far away from DRC’s office located in Dollo Ado. Bare 01 Kebele is an informal IDP site that has been established as a result of drought-displacement of people from the surrounding kebeles in 2017. According to DTM 12, there are 412 households and 2,277 individuals displaced in the site. Access to services: Food: The IDPs received Corn soya blend plus and benefited from Targeted supplementary Feeding programs (CSB and TSFP) once before. The government provided sorghum and edible oil the previous month before the visit and the amount of food was only enough for one month. The
Recommended publications
  • Districts of Ethiopia
    Region District or Woredas Zone Remarks Afar Region Argobba Special Woreda -- Independent district/woredas Afar Region Afambo Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Asayita Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Chifra Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Dubti Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Elidar Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Kori Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Mille Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Abala Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Afdera Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Berhale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Dallol Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Erebti Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Koneba Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Megale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Amibara Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Awash Fentale Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Bure Mudaytu Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Dulecha Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Gewane Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Aura Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Ewa Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Gulina Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Teru Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Yalo Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Dalifage (formerly known as Artuma) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Dewe Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Hadele Ele (formerly known as Fursi) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Simurobi Gele'alo Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Telalak Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Amhara Region Achefer -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Angolalla Terana Asagirt -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Artuma Fursina Jile -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Banja -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Belessa --
    [Show full text]
  • OCHA Weekly Humanitarian Bulletin
    Weekly Humanitarian Bulletin Ethiopia 27 June 2017 Following poor performing spring rains, the number of people receiving humanitarian assistance has increased from 5.6 million to 7.8 million in the first quarter of the year, and is expected to heighten further in the second half of the year. Increased funding is needed Key Issues urgently, in particular to address immediate requirements for food and nutrition, as well as clean drinking water, much of which is being delivered long distances by truck as regular The Fall wells have dried up. Armyworm infestation Fall Armyworm threaten to destroy up to 2 million hectares of meher crops across Ethiopia continues to The Fall Armyworm infestation destroy meher continues to destroy meher crops crops across 233 across 233 woredas in six regions, woredas in six and it is spreading at an alarming regions, and it is rate. The pest has already affected spreading at an more than 145,000 hectares of alarming rate. maize cropland, mostly in traditionally surplus producing and First quarter densely populated areas. With the Therapeutic current pace, up to 2 million Feeding Program hectares of meher cropland are at admissions risk, leading to between 3 to 4 exceeded HRD million metric tons of grain loss. projections. The implication of this loss is multi- layered, impacting household food The number of security and national grain reserve irregular Ethiopian as well as potentially impacting migrants returning grain exports. from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia The Government, with support from (KSA) has the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) and other partners, is taking several measures to reached 35,000 curb the spread of the infestations, but the need exceeds the ongoing response.
    [Show full text]
  • COUNTRY Food Security Update
    ETHIOPIA Food Security Outlook Update September 2013 Crops are at their normal developmental stages in most parts of the country Figure 1. Projected food security outcomes, KEY MESSAGES September 2013 • Following the mostly normal performance of the June to September Kiremt rains, most crops are at their normally expected developmental stage. A near normal Meher harvest is expected in most parts of the country. However, in places where Kiremt rains started late and in areas where some weather-related hazards occurred, some below normal production is anticipated. • Market prices of most staple cereals remain stable at their elevated levels compared to previous months, but prices are likely to fall slightly starting in October due to the expected near normal Meher production in most parts of the country, which, in turn, will also improve household-level food access from October to December. Source: FEWS NET Ethiopia • Overall, current nutritional status compared to June/July has slightly improved or remains the same with exceptions in Figure 2. Projected food security outcomes, some areas in northeastern Tigray and Amhara Regions as October to December 2013 well as some parts of East Hararghe Zone in Oromia Region. In these areas, there are indications of deteriorating nutritional status due to the well below average Belg harvest and the current absence of a green harvest from long-cycle Meher crops. CURRENT SITUATION • Cumulative Kiremt rainfall from June to September was normal to above normal and evenly distributed in all of Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples’ Region (SNNPR), in most parts of Amhara, in central and western parts Oromia, and in the central parts of Tigray.
    [Show full text]
  • Hum Ethio Manitar Opia Rian Re Espons E Fund D
    Hum anitarian Response Fund Ethiopia OCHA, 2011 OCHA, 2011 Annual Report 2011 Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2011 Table of Contents Note from the Humanitarian Coordinator ................................................................................................ 2 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................. 3 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 2011 Humanitarian Context ........................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Map - 2011 HRF Supported Projects ............................................................................................. 6 2. Information on Contributors ................................................................................................................ 7 2.1 Donor Contributions to HRF .......................................................................................................... 7 3. Fund Overview .................................................................................................................................... 8 3.1 Summary of HRF Allocations in 2011 ............................................................................................ 8 3.1.1 HRF Allocation by Sector .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Agency Deyr/Karan 2012 Seasonal
    Food Supply Prospects FOR THE YEAR 2013 ______________________________________________________________________________ Disaster Risk Management and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS) Ministry of Agriculture (MoA) March 2013 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Table of Contents Glossary ................................................................................................................. 2 Acronyms ............................................................................................................... 3 EXCUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................. 4 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................... 11 REGIONAL SUMMARY OF FOOD SUPPLY PROSPECT ............................................. 14 SOMALI ............................................................................................................. 14 OROMIA ........................................................................................................... 21 TIGRAY .............................................................................................................. 27 AMHARA ........................................................................................................... 31 AFAR ................................................................................................................. 34 BENISHANGUL GUMUZ ..................................................................................... 37 SNNP ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Prioritization of Shelter/NFI Needs
    Prioritization of Shelter/NFI needs Date: 31st May 2018 Shelter and NFI Needs As of 18 May 2018, the overall number of displaced people is 345,000 households. This figure is based on DTM round 10, partner’s assessments, government requests, as well as the total of HH supported since July 2017. The S/NFI updated its prioritisation in early May and SNFI Cluster partners agreed on several criteria to guide prioritisation which include: - 1) type of emergency, 2) duration of displacement, and 3) sub-standard shelter conditions including IDPS hosted in collective centres and open-air sites and 4) % of vulnerable HH at IDP sites. Thresholds for the criteria were also agreed and in the subsequent analysis the cluster identified 193 IDP hosting woredas mostly in Oromia and Somali regions, as well as Tigray, Gambella and Addis Ababa municipality. A total of 261,830 HH are in need of urgent shelter and NFI assistance. At present the Cluster has a total of 57,000 kits in stocks and pipeline. The Cluster requires urgent funding to address the needs of 204,830 HHs that are living in desperate displacement conditions across the country. This caseload is predicted to increase as the flooding continues in the coming months. Shelter and NFI Priority Activities In terms of priority activities, the SNFI Cluster is in need of ES/NFI support for 140,259 HH displaced mainly due to flood and conflict under Pillar 2, primarily in Oromia and Somali Regions. In addition, the Shelter and NFI Cluster requires immediate funding for recovery activities to support 14,000 HH (8,000 rebuild and 6,000 repair) with transitional shelter support and shelter repair activities under Pillar 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report Drought Emergency Response Areas: Afar and Liben October to November 2014
    Pastoralist Areas Resilience Improvement Market Expansion (PRIME) Final Report Drought Emergency Response Areas: Afar and Liben October to November 2014 Report Submitted by: Mercy Corps Report submitted to: USAID/OFDA March 2015 Overview Organization Name Mercy Corps USAID Development Program Title Pastoralists Areas Resilience Improvement through Market Expansion (PRIME) Fodder voucher interventions in drought affected woredas of Program Title Liben zone in Somali and Gebi Resu (zone 3) in Afar regional states Sector Name Agriculture and Food Security To respond to deteriorated pasture conditions resulting from seasonal rainfall failure in target pastoralist areas, and prevent further decrease in productivity of livestock and losses of Objective productive assets of pastoral households in target affected areas. To protect development gains of PRIME in the above areas. Indicator 1: Number of animals benefiting from or affected by livestock activities 20,588 livestock assisted Indicator 2: Total number of critical market actors (e.g., producers, suppliers, traders, processers) directly assisted Indicators 309 small-scale fodder/feed suppliers, 2 wholesalers (commercial fodder supplier) and 4 local retailers participated Indicator 3. Number of people benefiting from livestock activities 9543 HHs (66,801 persons) benefited 1 Dollar Amount Financed USD 1,000,000 Target: 6,500 HHs (3,250 HHs in zone 3 of Afar and 3,250 HHs in Liben zone); 10,000 Livestock (5,000 in Afar and Number of People and Livestock Targeted 5,000 in Liben) Achieved:
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia: 3W - WASH Cluster Ongoing and Planned Activities Map (As of September 2017)
    Ethiopia: 3W - WASH Cluster Ongoing and Planned Activities map (as of September 2017) ERITREA 41Total Number of Partners RWB ☉ RWB Dalul Tahtay Koraro JSI IMC UNICEF RWB Berahile Red Sea RWB COOPI RWB RWB RWB VSF-G SUDAN Concern TIGRAY Addi Tselemti Afdera Arekay Plan Concern Ab Ala CARE Erebti COOPI ACF SCI Abergele Hintalo OWDA Wejirat PWO Gulf of RWB RWB ACF RWB RWB SCI RHB ACF RWB Kurri Aden RWB Sekota Ziquala ACF RWB Plan JSI Alamata Plan Dehana UNICEF RWB RWB CARITAS Oxfam Gulina Bugna RWB Gaz SCI Plan Gibla RWB AFAR AMHARA RWB Plan Concern RWB GOAL Delanta CARE JSI Mile DJIBOUTI JSI JSI Kalu RWB OWDA Were Ilu RWB RWB JSI RWB CARE Ayisha IRC OWDA Dewa Enarj UNICEF Gewane Cheffa BENISHANGUL Enawga RWB Bure RWB IMC Shinile GUMUZ SCI Mudaytu NRC IRC RWB Menz Gera SCI NRC IRC Midir Jille GOAL IR SCI UNICEF Timuga Afdem Dembel OWDA RWB IRC Aw-bare CARE IRC GAA Ensaro Ankober RWB Maokomo RWB RWB SCI Erer DIRE Special RWB ECC-SADCO Miesso IR EOC-DICAC DAWA DRC SCI IRC Amibara RWB NRC UNICEF Tulo SCI RWB RWB Chiro ACF HARERI CARE Zuria Bedeno UNICEF RWB JSI ACF ACF ACF IMC Babile Plan Malka SOMALIA RWB RWB Girawa Fedis SOUTH SUDAN Meko Balo SOS IRC Anchar Plan RWB RWB RWB RWB ACF Meyumuluka Habro WV Aware Itang Merti Oxfam NRC Degehabur RWB OWDA RWB COOPI Gashamo RWB RWB Gambela Havoyo PWO ADCS Oxfam ADRA RWB RWB NRC Danot Zuria RWB RWB RWB NRC RWB SCI NCA OROMIA SCI OWDA RWB RWB Oxfam NRC RWB PWO SCI RWB Fik RWB GOAL RWB IRC OWDA Hamero Gunagado Boh GAMBELA Concern RWB Oxfam RWB Seru SCI RWB RWB IRC GOAL RWB BBBC GOAL RWB HFHE SCI SCI
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL EVALUATION of “Emergency Program to Assist the Vulnerable
    FINAL EVALUATION of “Emergency program to assist the vulnerable people in LIBAN Woreda, Borena Zone of Oromia Regional State FILTU Woreda, Liben Zone of Somali Regional State” Funded by USAID OFDA June 2002 By: Carlo Maconi Index of contents 1 SUMMARY 1 2 BACK GROUND 3 2.1 GOVERNMENT/POLICY SUPPORT 3 2.2 FEATURES OF THE SUB SECTOR 3 2.3 BENEFICIARIES & PARTIES INVOLVED 3 2.4 PROBLEMS TO BE ADDRESSED 5 2.5 OTHER INTERVENTIONS 6 2.6 DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE 7 3 INTERVENTION ACHIEVED 8 3.1 OVERALL OBJECTIVE 8 3.2 PROJECT PURPOSE 8 3.3 RESULTS 8 3.4 EFFECTIVENESS 13 3.5 OVERALL OUTCOME AND IMPACT 13 3.6 ACTIVITIES 15 4 ASSUMPTION 16 5 IMPLEMENTATION 17 5.1 ORGANIZATION AND IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURES 17 5.2 TIMETABLE 17 5.3 COSTS AND FINANCING PLAN 18 5.4 SPECIAL CONDITIONS/ACCOMPANYING MEASURES TAKEN BY GOVERNMENT 18 6 SUSTAINABILITY 19 6.1 POLICY SUPPORT 19 6.2 APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY 19 6.3 SOCIO CULTURAL ASPECTS 19 6.4 INSTITUTIONAL AND MANAGEMENT CAPACITY 20 7 MONITORING & EVALUATION 22 7.1 DEFINITION OF INDICATORS 22 7.2 REVIEWS/EVALUATION 22 8 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMANDATIONS 22 Final Evaluation Project title: “Emergency program to assist vulnerable people in Liben and Filtu Woreda” 1 SUMMARY COOPI is an International Non Governmental Organization based in Italy-Milan. In Ethiopia COOPI is working since 1995 and it’s headquarter is located in Addis Ababa. Among the different projects that COOPI has been implementing in draught affected areas of the country like Somali Region and low land part of Oromiya Region, the project entitled by “Emergency program to assist vulnerable people in Liben Zone-Somali National Regional state and Borena Zone-Oromia regional state” was funded by USAID/OFDA is one.
    [Show full text]
  • Somali Region
    Food Supply Prospects FOR THE SECOND HALF OF YEAR 2013 ______________________________________________________________________________ Disaster Risk Management and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS) Ministry of Agriculture (MoA) September, 2013 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY OF LOCAL NAMES .................................................................. 1 ACRONYMS ............................................................................................. 2 EXCUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 7 REGIONAL SUMMARY OF FOOD SUPPLY PROSPECT ............................. 11 SOMALI .............................................................................................. 11 OROMIA ............................................................................................. 16 TIGRAY ............................................................................................... 22 AMHARA ............................................................................................ 25 AFAR .................................................................................................. 28 SNNP .................................................................................................. 32 Annex – 1: NEEDY POPULATION AND FOOD REQUIREMENT BY WOREDA (Second half of 2013) ............................................................................ 35 0 | P a g e GLOSSARY
    [Show full text]
  • Somali Region: Multi – Agency Deyr/Karan 2012 Seasonal Assessment Report
    SOMALI REGION: MULTI – AGENCY DEYR/KARAN 2012 SEASONAL ASSESSMENT REPORT REGION Somali Regional State November 24 – December 18, 2012 DATE ASSESSMENT STARTED & COMPLETED TEAM MEMBERS – Regional analysis and report NAME AGENCY Ahmed Abdirahman{Ali-eed} SCI Ahmed Mohamed FAO Adawe Warsame UNICEF Teyib Sheriff Nur FAO Mahado Kasim UNICEF Mohamed Mohamud WFP Name of the Agencies Participated Deyr 2012 Need Assessment Government Bureaus DRMFSS, DPPB,RWB,LCRDB,REB,RHB,PCDP UN – WFP,UNICEF,OCHA,FAO,WHO Organization INGO SCI,MC,ADRA,IRC,CHF,OXFAMGB,Intermon Oxfam, IR,SOS,MSFH,ACF LNGO HCS,OWDA,UNISOD,DAAD,ADHOC,SAAD,KRDA 1: BACKGROUND Somali Region is one of largest regions of Ethiopia. The region comprises of nine administrative zones which in terms of livelihoods are categorised into 17 livelihood zones. The climate is mostly arid/semi-arid in lowland areas and cooler/wetter in the higher areas. Annual rainfall ranges from 150 - ~600mm per year. The region can be divided into two broader rainfall regimes based on the seasons of the year: Siti and Fafan zones to the north, and the remaining seven zones to the south. The rainfall pattern for both is bimodal but the timings differ slightly. The southern seven zones (Nogob, Jarar, Korahe, Doollo, Shabelle, Afder, Liban and Harshin District of Fafan Zone) receive ‘Gu’ rains (main season) from mid April to end of June, and secondary rains known as ‘Deyr’ from early October to late December. In the north, Siti and Fafan zones excluding Harshin of Fafan zone receive ‘Dirra’ - Objectives of the assessment also known as ‘Gu’ rains from late March To evaluate the outcome of the Deyr/Karan to late May.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia: Effects of Civil War on Nutrition, Mortality, and Vaccination Coverage Using CE-DAT Database from 2000 – 2008
    274 Working Paper Ethiopia: effects of civil war on nutrition, mortality, and vaccination coverage using CE-DAT database from 2000 – 2008 Sindu Workneh December 2009 Complex Emergency Database Ethiopia: effects of civil war on nutrition, mortality, and vaccination coverage using CE-DAT database from 2000 – 2008 Sindu Workneh 1 December, 2009 German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin), Germany Center for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED), Belgium 1 Doctoral Student at German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin), Email: [email protected] This report is prepared during an internship work as part of the PhD program at the Center for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED), Brussels Belgium. The author is grateful for the professional mentorship of CRED staff during the internship. Any error in the report remains to be the author’s. List of Abbreviations AAU Addis Ababa University AFD Alliance for Freedom and Democracy CE-DAT Complex Emergencies Data Base CMR Crude Mortality Rate CRED Center for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters CSA Central Statistical Agency CUD Coalition for Unity and Democracy EDHS Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey EEBC Eritrea-Ethiopia Boundary Commission EPPF Ethiopian People’s Patriotic Front EPRDF Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front FDRE Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia GAM Global Acute Malnutrition GDP Gross Domestic Product GNI Gross National Income GPLM/F Gambella Peoples Liberation Movement/Force HSDP Health Sector Development Program IDP Internally
    [Show full text]