DOCSLIB.ORG

Adels- Und Königsfamilien Im Spiegel Ihrer Memorialüberlieferung: Studien Zum Totengedenken Der Billunger Und Ottonen Frederick S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Adels- Und Königsfamilien Im Spiegel Ihrer Memorialüberlieferung: Studien Zum Totengedenken Der Billunger Und Ottonen Frederick S Connecticut College Digital Commons @ Connecticut College History Faculty Publications History Department 4-1997 (Review) Adels- und Königsfamilien im Spiegel ihrer Memorialüberlieferung: Studien zum Totengedenken der Billunger und Ottonen Frederick S. Paxton Connecticut College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/histfacpub Part of the Diplomatic History Commons, European History Commons, and the History of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Paxton, Frederick S. "Adels- Und Königsfamilien Im Spiegel Ihrer Memorialüberlieferung: Studien Zum Totengedenken Der Billunger Und Ottonen." Speculum 62.2 (1987): 379-81. Web. This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the History Department at Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author. (Review) Adels- und Königsfamilien im Spiegel ihrer Memorialüberlieferung: Studien zum Totengedenken der Billunger und Ottonen Keywords necrology, lordship, Germany Comments Initially published in Speculum, 1997, p.379-81. Copyright © The eM dieval Academy of America 1987 DOI: 10.2307/2855233 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2855233 This book review is available at Digital Commons @ Connecticut College: http://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/histfacpub/37 Medieval Academy of America Adels- und Königsfamilien im Spiegel ihrer Memorialüberlieferung: Studien zum Totengedenken der Billunger und Ottonen by Gerd Althoff Review by: Frederick S. Paxton Speculum, Vol. 62, No. 2 (Apr., 1987), pp. 379-381 Published by: Medieval Academy of America Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2855233 . Accessed: 01/03/2013 12:14 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Medieval Academy of America is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Speculum. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded on Fri, 1 Mar 2013 12:14:48 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Reviews 379 textualtechniques of Fuhrmann and Mordek. He has of course to deal withthe great difficultythat Alger's text is more of a treatisethan a collectionof laws, so that dicta and canons flowtogether. The textual solutionsare necessaryand suitable. The sub- stance of the double apparatus is appropriate, unblemished by printer'serrors or proofreading slips. But I do question the forms of notation used in the text and apparatus. Is it necessaryto clutterthe text with raised lettersin order to draw the reader's attentionto the variantsin the apparatus criticus?A line-by-linenotation is surely all that is needed. The variants themselvescould have been more simplyex- pressed: many are merelychanges in word order. For example, 2.57 (p. 305, line 9) reads "accusatoresnon debentm";in the apparatus we find"m accusatoresnon debent] non debent accusatoresCT." Whynot simply"non debent accusatorestr. CT"? Or 3.60 (p. 360, line 14) "apostolical per nos auctoritate',"which leads to the variant"i apos- tolica-auctoritate] auctoritateapostolica per nos T," where "auctoritateapostolica per nos tr.T" would have been more efficientand more informative. The fiveindices thatcomplete the volume are fulland easy to use, except in the case of the last, "Personen-,Orts- und Sachregister"(pp. 403-11). For example, Mabillon, who firstpublished the preface of DMI in 1675, appears in the index in six places, but the importantreference on page 157, note 4, is missing.Likewise Alger's use of the term "corpus canonum" (p. 111) deserves some identificationin the index. But these are triflingpoints. Dr. Kretzschmarhas produced a work of outstanding scholarshipwhich well deserves its place in the series Quellen und Forschungenzum Recht im Mittelalter. JOHN GILCHRIST Trent University GERD ALTHOFF, Adels-und Konigsfamilienim Spiegelihrer Memorialiuberlieferung: Studien zumTotengedenken der Billunger und Ottonen.(Miinstersche Mittelalter-Schriften, 47.) Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 1984. Pp. 440; 4 fold-outdiagrams. DM 78. THIS BEAUTIFULLY PRODUCED and fascinatingbook should provide rich rewards to anyone interestedin the nature of lordship and the familyin the centralMiddle Ages or puzzled by the meaning and social contextof the necrologicaldocuments so charac- teristicof the age. Drawing on deep familiaritywith the necrologies of Merseburg, Magdeburg, and Luneburg, which he and Joachim Wollasch have published in a facsimileedition for the Monumenta Germaniae Historica (Libri Memoriales et Ne- crologia,nova series 2 [1983]), Gerd Althoffargues thatreligious houses founded and continuouslyinfluenced by one familybest preserve the commemorativerecords of thatfamily and thatthe names in theirnecrologies delineate a circleof debitores,that is, those who supported the familyand itslordship. A complete analysisof such a necrol- ogy should reveal, then, the "social horizons" of both familyand lordship at various stages of theirdevelopment. Althoff'sstudies are technicaland difficult,but the author and publisherhave gone to much trouble to aid the reader. The complexityof the argumentsis mitigatedby a welcome habit of summing up at regular intervals.The book contains an index of persons discussed in the text,four diagrams illustratingthe chronologicalscope and content of the pertinent necrologies, and, most importantly,almost 150 pages of commentaryon the people whose names were entered therein. Although the com- This content downloaded on Fri, 1 Mar 2013 12:14:48 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 380 Reviews mentsunder an individual name are oftenof littlehelp while reading the text,since theytend to summarize and referback to its arguments,the commentaryas a whole will be a useful tool for futureresearch. The addition of a subject index also would have been welcome. The necrologyof the Saxon monasteryof St. Michael, Luineburg,is the "mirror"in which Althoffis able to read the historyof the familyof Hermann Billung. But the historicalreflections are obscured in the document, since the verynature of a necrol- ogy, which lists names by death date and not as a group (as is the case with the confraternitybooks thathave been utilizedin the past), means thatthe various entries must be rearranged before furtherwork can be done. Thus the analysis proceeds archaeologically,uncovering the various layers of the necrologyand reconstructing the historicalcircumstances of theirinitiation and transmission. The earliest layer of entriessuggests that the Billungs emerged fromthe "descen- dants of Widukind," a familygroup whose members occupied the most important episcopal sees in northernSaxony in the late ninthcentury. The preservationof this early layer of memorials by Duke Hermann's brotherWichmann the Elder and his nephews Egbert and Wichmann means, argues Althoff,that the familyof Wichmann held a more centralplace in the clan in the mid-tenthcentury than thatof his brother. Moreover,because theyoriginated in the familyof Wichmann,the Luneburg memo- rials reveal the compositionof rebelliousconiurationes, for the Saxon enemies of Otto I entered into pacts not only of aid and protectionbut of mutual commemorationafter death. The ducal familyitself appears in the centerof the Luneburg memorialsonly in the 970s when a rapprochementbetween Egbert and Hermann's son Bernhard I led to the latter'sassumption of the dutyof commemoratingthe dead ancestorsand debitores of the family.This transferof responsibilitiespreviously seen to by his cousins reveals thatthe feud withinthe clan had healed and thatthe Billungs had by Bernhard's time become preeminent.Indeed the assumptionof commemorativeduties and the provi- sioningof a familyfoundation to see thatthey were carried out were, Althoffargues, preconditionsof both emergentlordship and (agnatic) familyconsciousness. The memorials of the early eleventh centurymirror the social map of the ducal house at the heightof its development. They show that,contrary to historiographical expectations,the Saxon bishops did not unanimouslysupport the eastern policies of Henry II, butjoined withthe Billungs in strongopposition to the emperor. The death of Henry and the accession of Conrad II broughtan end to the Billung coalitionwith the bishops and betterrelations with the emperor,but those did not outlastthe reign of Henry III. Unfortunatelythe Luneburg memorials give no informationon the Billungs and theirsupporters in the Saxon wars of Henry IV. For reasons thatremain unclear, the political influence and the commemorativeactivity of the Billungs de- clined sharply in the late eleventh century,and, although the author suspects some connectionbetween the two, he admits that it is not apparent. When Althoffturns to the memorials of the Ottonians,he faces a differentset of problems. First of all, no necrology from the familyfoundations at Gandersheim, Quedlinburg, or St. Moritz in Magdeburg has survived as such. His archaeological methodology,however, provides the means
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Medieval Germany in America
    GERMAN HISTORICAL INSTITUTE WASHNGTON, D.C. ANNUAL LECTURE SERIES No. 8 MEDIEVAL GERMANY IN AMERICA Patrick J. Geary With a comment by Otto Gerhard Oexle ANNUAL LECTURE 1995 German Historical Institute Washington, D.C. MEDIEVAL GERMANY IN AMERICA Patrick J. Geary With a comment by Otto Gerhard Oexle © 1996 by German Historical Institute Annual Lecture Series, No. 8 Edited by Detlef Junker, Petra Marquardt-Bigman and Janine S. Micunck ______________ GERMAN HISTORICAL INSTITUTE 1607 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20009, USA MEDIEVAL GERMANY IN AMERICA Patrick J. Geary WAS THERE ANYTHING TO LEARN? American Historians and German Medieval Scholarship: A Comment Otto Gerhard Oexle Preface For the first time since the founding of the German Historical Institute in 1987, the topic of the 1995 Annual Lecture addressed the German Middle Ages—as perceived through American eyes. We invited two distinguished scholars from the United States and Germany, and their presentations made this evening a truly special event. In his lecture, Professor Patrick J. Geary traced the influence of German medievalists, especially their methods and historiography, on American academia. During the second half of the nineteenth century, German scholarship came to be regarded as an exemplary model, owing to its scholarly excellence. However, within a few decades, German medieval scholarship's function as a model for American academics declined. Professor Geary gave an engaging account of this development and offered at the same time an absorbing analysis of how the perception and interpreta- tion of German medieval history by American historians were shaped by their attempt to explain American history.
    [Show full text]
  • The Carolingian Past in Post-Carolingian Europe Simon Maclean
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by St Andrews Research Repository 1 The Carolingian Past in Post-Carolingian Europe Simon MacLean On 28 January 893, a 13-year-old known to posterity as Charles III “the Simple” (or “Straightforward”) was crowned king of West Francia at the great cathedral of Rheims. Charles was a great-great-grandson in the direct male line of the emperor Charlemagne andclung tightly to his Carolingian heritage throughout his life.1 Indeed, 28 January was chosen for the coronation precisely because it was the anniversary of his great ancestor’s death in 814. However, the coronation, for all its pointed symbolism, was not a simple continuation of his family’s long-standing hegemony – it was an act of rebellion. Five years earlier, in 888, a dearth of viable successors to the emperor Charles the Fat had shattered the monopoly on royal authority which the Carolingian dynasty had claimed since 751. The succession crisis resolved itself via the appearance in all of the Frankish kingdoms of kings from outside the family’s male line (and in some cases from outside the family altogether) including, in West Francia, the erstwhile count of Paris Odo – and while Charles’s family would again hold royal status for a substantial part of the tenth century, in the long run it was Odo’s, the Capetians, which prevailed. Charles the Simple, then, was a man displaced in time: a Carolingian marooned in a post-Carolingian political world where belonging to the dynasty of Charlemagne had lost its hegemonic significance , however loudly it was proclaimed.2 His dilemma represents a peculiar syndrome of the tenth century and stands as a symbol for the theme of this article, which asks how members of the tenth-century ruling class perceived their relationship to the Carolingian past.
    [Show full text]
  • The Construction of Ottonian Kingship Ottonian of Construction The
    INTELLECTUAL AND POLITICAL HISTORY Grabowski The Construction of Ottonian Kingship Antoni Grabowski The Construction of Ottonian Kingship Narratives and Myth in Tenth-Century Germany The Construction of Ottonian Kingship The Construction of Ottonian Kingship Narratives and Myth in Tenth-Century Germany Antoni Grabowski Amsterdam University Press Cover illustration: Interior of Collegiate Church of Quedlinburg Source: NoRud / Wikimedia Commons [CC BY-SA 3.0 de (https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-sa/3.0/de/deed.en) Cover design: Coördesign, Leiden Lay-out: Crius Group, Hulshout isbn 978 94 6298 723 4 e-isbn 978 90 4853 873 7 (pdf) doi 10.5117/9789462987234 nur 684 © Antoni Grabowski / Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam 2018 All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this book may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the written permission of both the copyright owner and the author of the book. Table of Contents Acknowledgements 7 Note on Citations 9 Introduction 11 1 Aims and State of the Art 12 2 What is Myth/Mythology? 15 3 Liudprand’s Biography 19 4 Origins of Antapodosis 23 5 Language of Antapodosis 27 6 Other Contemporary Sources: Widukind’s Res gestae saxoni- cae; Continuation of the Chronicle of Regino of Prüm; Hrotsvit’s Gesta Ottonis 29 7 Interpreter of Liudprand: Frutolf of Michelsberg 30 8 Understanding Liudprand’s Works: Textbooks
    [Show full text]
  • Qualitative Changes in Ethno-Linguistic Status : a Case Study of the Sorbs in Germany
    Qualitative Changes in Ethno-linguistic Status: A Case Study of the Sorbs in Germany by Ted Cicholi RN (Psych.), MA. Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Political Science School of Government 22 September 2004 Disclaimer Although every effort has been taken to ensure that all Hyperlinks to the Internet Web sites cited in this dissertation are correct at the time of writing, no responsibility can be taken for any changes to these URL addresses. This may change the format as being either underlined, or without underlining. Due to the fickle nature of the Internet at times, some addresses may not be found after the initial publication of an article. For instance, some confusion may arise when an article address changes from "front page", such as in newspaper sites, to an archive listing. This dissertation has employed the Australian English version of spelling but, where other works have been cited, the original spelling has been maintained. It should be borne in mind that there are a number of peculiarities found in United States English and Australian English, particular in the spelling of a number of words. Interestingly, not all errors or irregularities are corrected by software such as Word 'Spelling and Grammar Check' programme. Finally, it was not possible to insert all the accents found in other languages and some formatting irregularities were beyond the control of the author. Declaration This dissertation does not contain any material which has been accepted for the award of any other higher degree or graduate diploma in any tertiary institution.
    [Show full text]
  • Imperial Ladies of the Ottonian Dynasty: Women and Rule in Tenth-Century Germany
    2019 VI Imperial Ladies of the Ottonian Dynasty: Women and Rule in Tenth-Century Germany Phyllis G. Jestice New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018 Review by: Fraser McNair Review by: Agata Zielinska Review: Imperial Ladies of the Ottonian Dynasty: Women and Rule in Tenth-Century Germany Imperial Ladies of the Ottonian Dynasty: Women and Rule in Tenth-Century Germany. By Phyllis G. Jestice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. ISBN 978-3-319- 77305-6. xi+300 pp. £79.99. ne of the questions Phyllis Jestice confronts in her new book on the Ottonian rulers Adelaide and Theophanu is whether or not the tenth century was a ‘golden age’ for women. Certainly, we are O at the moment living through a golden age in the study of tenth- century women, and particularly of Ottonian queenship. Imperial Ladies of the Ottonian Dynasty is the third major English-language monograph on Ottonian queens to be released in the last two years. This interest is very welcome: as Jestice notes, these are not works of ‘women’s history,’ but studies of political history that focus on some of the most important European figures of their times. Given how many mysteries remain about theories and practices of tenth-century government, this is self-evidently worthwhile. Jestice concentrates on Empresses Adelaide and Theophanu. After the unexpected death of Otto II, these empresses were able to beat out the young emperor Otto III’s cousin Henry of Bavaria and successfully act as regents during the 980s and 990s, despite Henry’s seemingly overwhelming initial advantages in competing for the position.
    [Show full text]
  • REVIEWS Barbara Rosenwein and Lester K. Little, Eds
    REVIEWS Barbara Rosenwein and Lester K. Little, eds., Debating the Middle Ages: Issues and Readings (Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers 1998) xiii + 396 pp. This volume brings together recent scholarship in four areas of medie - val studies which have see n dramatic development and innovation over the past two decades. The assembled articles by leading American, British, and continental scholars represent mostly previously published material which has contributed in some way to discussions on the Fall of Ro me, Feudalism, Gender, and Religion. Since the works of several of the authors, like Gerd Althoff and Jean -Claude Schmitt, are not widely available in English, the book is additionally useful for expos - ing readers not fluent in German, French and Italian —and I am think - ing of undergraduates in particular —to important trends in continental scholarship. No book can be all things to all people. The subjects taken up in De - bating the Middle Ages reflect for the most part those which have also occupied the two e ditors in some way, both of whom are leading histo - rians of European social history with a focus on religion and religious institutions. Thus other areas of medieval studies which have arguably been transformed in equally profound ways over the past twenty years, particularly art history and literary studies, are not represented as such. But this is one minor drawback to a book which will make an otherwise excellent reader for an undergraduate, or even graduate, course on me - dieval history or historiography . Each section is not a coherent presentation of a particular histo - riographical debate per se , but offers five to six individual perspectives on a select topic.
    [Show full text]
  • Central European History and the Holy Roman Empire
    Central European History and the Holy Roman Empire Joachim Whaley Central European History began to appear at a crucial juncture in the historiography of the Holy Roman Empire. Of course its remit was much broader. Founded sixteen years before the British journal German History, Central European History, together with the Austrian History Yearbook (founded 1965) and the East European Quarterly (founded 1967), took over the role occupied between 1941 and 1964 by the Journal of Central European Affairs. Each of these US journals shared an openness to new approaches and to work on all periods since the Middle Ages as well as a desire to keep ‘readers abreast of new literature in the field….’ with ‘reflective, critical reviews or review articles dealing with works of central importance… [and] bibliographical articles dealing with limited periods or themes…’1 This was an ambitious programme but, remarkably, the journal was as good as its word in relation to medieval and early modern studies.2 The second issue in Volume 1 (1968) published William J. McGill on Kaunitz’s Italian policy; Volume 2 brought Theodor Brodek on ‘Lay Community and Church Institutions of the Lahngau in the Late Middle Ages’ and Mack Walker on ‘Napoleonic Germany and the Hometown Communities’. Successive volumes included important essays by Leon Stein, Otakar Odložilík, Carl C. Christensen, Marlene Jahss LeGates, James Allen Vann, Bodo Nischan, Stephen W. Rowan, Thomas J. Glas-Hochstettler, R.J.W. Evans and others. The first major review articles on pre-modern subjects appeared in 1978 with Erik Midelfort’s fine survey ’The Revolution of 1525? Recent Studies of the Peasants’ War’ and Gerald Strauss’s essay ‘The Holy Roman Empire Revisited’.
    [Show full text]
  • Power and Political Communication. Feasting and Gift Giving in Medieval Iceland
    Power and Political Communication. Feasting and Gift Giving in Medieval Iceland By Vidar Palsson A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor John Lindow, Co-chair Professor Thomas A. Brady Jr., Co-chair Professor Maureen C. Miller Professor Carol J. Clover Fall 2010 Abstract Power and Political Communication. Feasting and Gift Giving in Medieval Iceland By Vidar Palsson Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor John Lindow, Co-chair Professor Thomas A. Brady Jr., Co-chair The present study has a double primary aim. Firstly, it seeks to analyze the sociopolitical functionality of feasting and gift giving as modes of political communication in later twelfth- and thirteenth-century Iceland, primarily but not exclusively through its secular prose narratives. Secondly, it aims to place that functionality within the larger framework of the power and politics that shape its applications and perception. Feasts and gifts established friendships. Unlike modern friendship, its medieval namesake was anything but a free and spontaneous practice, and neither were its primary modes and media of expression. None of these elements were the casual business of just anyone. The argumentative structure of the present study aims roughly to correspond to the preliminary and general historiographical sketch with which it opens: while duly emphasizing the contractual functions of demonstrative action, the backbone of traditional scholarship, it also highlights its framework of power, subjectivity, limitations, and ultimate ambiguity, as more recent studies have justifiably urged.
    [Show full text]
  • Siedlung Und Verfassung Der Slawen Zwischen Eibe, Saale Und Oder
    I, :// Siedlung und Verfassung der Slawen zwischen EIbe, Saale und Oder In Verbindung mit H. JANKUHN, \V. SCHLESINGER und E. SCHWARZ hera usgegeben von HERBERT LUDAT 1960 WILHELM SCHMITZ VERLAG GIESSEN (-:lU- r '"152) \VOLFGANG H. FRITZE Probleme der abodritischen Stammes- und Reichsverfassung und ihrer Entwicklung vom Stammesstaat zum Herrschaftsstaat GIlederung: Vorbemerkung. 1. Die abodritischen Teilstammgehiete tics 11. und 12. Jhs. 2. Das Abudritcn- reich und seine innere Gliederung im 8. und 9. Jh. 3. Das Ahodritenreich lind seine Tcil stü mnu- VOIll l ü, his zum 12. Jh. 4. Samtherrscher und Adel, Die Entwicklung ihres Verhältuissos Y0111 \I. his ZUIIl 12. Jh. 5. Die drei Hauptperioden der abodritischen Verfassungsgeschichle und die sie charuk tortstercnden 'I'ypen potittsehcr Organisation. Excurse I-IV. Eine Geschichte des Abodritenstammes und seines Reiches wird sich wohl nie schreiben lassen - dazu ist ihre Überlieferung zu dürftig. Auch für eine Gesamtdarstellung seiner Verfassungsgeschichte reicht unser Quellenmaterial nicht aus, vor allem infolge des Umstun- des, daß der gesamte Urkundenbestand des Hochstifts Oldenburg in Holstein, des l\lillcl- punktes der alten ahodritischen Diözese Oldenburg, uns verloren ist. Der Versuch der iiltercn Forschung, diese Lücke mit Hilfe der Fürstenurkunden des 12. und l:i. Jahrhunderts, und zwar vorzugsweise der pommersehen, zu schließen, ist in der Form, in der er vorgenommen worden ist, nicht zulässig 1). Dennoch bietet der Abodritenstamm für einige Grundfragen der allslawischen Stammesverfassung und ihrer Entwicklung in gewisser Weise verhältnismüüig günstige Voraussetzungen. Die Abodriten sind der einzige slawische Verband, der nicht nur vom 8. bis zu seiner Germanisierung im 12. und 13. Jahrhundert durchgehend als solcher bezeugt ist, sondern der auch in dieser ganzen Zeit eine gewisse politische Geschlossenheit bewahrt hat.
    [Show full text]
  • Aufgeführte Gefühle
    Gerd Althoff Aufgeführte Gefühle Die Rolle der Emotionen in den öffentlichen Ritualen des Mittelalters Abstract Since the writings of Johan Huizinga and Norbert Elias medieval men and women are often considered to have reacted to situations with spontaneous immediacy and with strong emotions. Modernity, on the other hand, is seen as the result of a process of civilization. Today we have better command of our emotions. Meanwhile this approach has been widely criticized, especially since the Middle Ages have been discovered as an era of public stagings. Communication in public was first and foremost “staged” and to a large ex- tend ritualized. This ritualization helped to install and maintain public order. It is in this context that “staged emotions” also play an important role. They were signs in symbolic interactions and thus cannot be measured by our con- temporary standards of authentic feelings. Their purpose was to confirm the speaker’s statements and to bind them with a higher degree of commitment. This can be well demonstrated by a number of examples from the twelfth century in particular. Gerd Althoff: Aufgeführte Gefühle Aufgeführte Gefühle Stellen wir an den Anfang eine Geschichte von scheinbar emotional aufge- wühlten mittelalterlichen Menschen.1 Die Geschichte beginnt in Konstanz und endet in Mailand. Sie stammt aus dem Jahre 1153 und wird von Otto Morena, einem juristisch versierten Bürger von Lodi erzählt, der zur politi- schen Führungsschicht dieser Stadt gehörte. Er wusste also, wovon er sprach. Die Geschichte handelt davon, wie es zur Unterstützung der italienischen Stadt Lodi durch Friedrich Barbarossa und zu seinem Zorn und Hass auf Mailand kam.2 Zwei Bürger aus Lodi waren nach Konstanz gekommen, wo sie eher zufäl- lig einem Hoftag Friedrich Barbarossas beiwohnten.
    [Show full text]
  • De Nakomelingen Van Titus Manlius Imperiosus Torquatus
    een genealogieonline publicatie De nakomelingen van Titus Manlius Imperiosus Torquatus door Roel Snelder 4 augustus 2021 De nakomelingen van Titus Manlius Imperiosus Torquatus Roel Snelder De nakomelingen van Titus Manlius Imperiosus Torquatus Generatie 1 1. Titus Manlius Imperiosus Torquatus, zoon van Lucius Manlius Capitolinus Imperiosus, is geboren . Titus Manlius Imperiosus Torquatus is overleden . Generatie 2 2. Titus Manlius Torquatus, zoon van Titus Manlius Imperiosus Torquatus en ??, is geboren . Hij is getrouwd met ??. Zij kregen 1 kind: Titus Manlius Torquatus, volg 3. Titus Manlius Torquatus is overleden 299. Generatie 3 3. Titus Manlius Torquatus, zoon van Titus Manlius Torquatus en ??, is geboren . Titus Manlius Torquatus is overleden 202 BC. Generatie 4 4. Aulus Manlius Torquatus, zoon van Titus Manlius Torquatus en ??, is geboren . Hij is getrouwd met (Niet openbaar). Zij kregen 1 kind: Titus Manlius Torquatus, volg 5. Aulus Manlius Torquatus is overleden . Generatie 5 5. Titus Manlius Torquatus, zoon van Aulus Manlius Torquatus en (Niet openbaar), is geboren . Hij is getrouwd met (Niet openbaar). Zij kregen 1 kind: Decimus Junius Silanus Manlianus, volg 6. Titus Manlius Torquatus is overleden . https://www.genealogieonline.nl/stamboom-snelder-versteegh/ 1 De nakomelingen van Titus Manlius Imperiosus Torquatus Roel Snelder Generatie 6 6. Decimus Junius Silanus Manlianus, zoon van Titus Manlius Torquatus en (Niet openbaar), is geboren . Hij is getrouwd met (Niet openbaar). Zij kregen 1 kind: Marcus Junius Silanus consul, volg 7. Decimus Junius Silanus Manlianus is overleden . Generatie 7 7. Marcus Junius Silanus consul, zoon van Decimus Junius Silanus Manlianus en (Niet openbaar), is geboren . Hij is getrouwd met (Niet openbaar). Zij kregen 1 kind: Marcus Junius Silanus, volg 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Gerd Althoff, Jutta Götzmann, Matthias Puhlen (Hg.), Spektakel Der Macht
    Francia-Recensio 2011/2 Mittelalter – Moyen Âge (500–1500) Gerd Althoff, Jutta Götzmann, Matthias Puhlen (Hg.), Spektakel der Macht. Rituale im Alten Europa 800–1800, Darmstadt (Primus Verlag) 2008, 256 S., 250 Abb., ISBN 978-3-89678-634-0, EUR 29,90. rezensiert von/compte rendu rédigé par Warren C. Brown, Pasadena, CA This book catalogues an exhibition of the same name, held in the Museum for Cultural History in Magdeburg from September 2008 to January 2009 and produced jointly by the museum and the University of Münster’s Special Research Area 496, »Symbolic Communication and Social Value Systems from the Middle Ages to the French Revolution«. The book is much more than a catalogue, however. It offers a very good introduction to current research on ritual and power in pre-modern Europe, with a focus on the evidence for ritual that can be seen, touched, read, or heard. The volume projects a set of assumptions and arguments that will be instantly recognizable to anyone familiar with the work of the Münster school of ritual studies, namely, that rituals in pre-modern Europe were not merely spectacles but rather chains of symbolic actions that both reflected reality and helped to shape it. These ceremonial and symbolic actions were public, in the sense of the German öffentlich rather than staatlich. They drew on a relatively fixed vocabulary of symbolic gestures that had more or less commonly accepted meanings. Like the original exhibition, the volume assumes that a distinct culture of such symbolic communication transcended and united what are traditionally known as the Middle Ages and the Early Modern period.
    [Show full text]