DOCSLIB.ORG

D4.3 Report on the Implementation of the Training and Advocacy Programmes Around Europe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
D4.3 Report on the Implementation of the Training and Advocacy Programmes Around Europe D4.3 Report on the implementation of the training and advocacy programmes around Europe Miller, Steve; Bouwers, M; Smallman, M. University College London (UCL) Page D4.3 - Report on the training and advocacy programmes Document description Document Name Report on the implementation of the training and advocacy programmes around Europe Document ID D4.3 Revision Final Revision Date 31-12-2016 Author(s) S. Miller, M. Bouwers, M. Smallman Additional Contributions Acknowledgements Note 2 D4.3 - Report on the training and advocacy programmes Document description........................................................................................... 2 1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 5 2 T 4.1 Development and pilot of a training programme ..................................... 6 2.1 The RRI Tools approach and learning outcomes ................................................... 6 2.2 Training section in the RRI Toolkit ............................. ¡Error! Marcador no definido. 2.3 Training modules and resources ........................................................................ 11 2.3.1 Explaining the RRI concept ................................................................................. 11 2.3.2 Why is RRI important ......................................................................................... 11 2.3.3 Using the RRI toolkit ........................................................................................... 11 2.3.4 Showcases .......................................................................................................... 13 2.3.5 Additional materials ........................................................................................... 15 3 T 4.2 Development of an advocacy programme ............................................. 16 3.1 Objectives and target audiences ....................................................................... 16 3.2 Enhancing the advocacy programme ................................................................ 177 4 T 4.3 Train the trainers (T3) .......................................................................... 188 4.1 Overview ......................................................................................................... 188 4.2 First T3 workshop ............................................................................................ 199 4.3 Second T3 workshop ......................................................................................... 20 4.4 Outcomes of the Train-the-trainers programme ................................................ 22 5 T 4.4 Implementation of the training and advocacy programme .................... 23 5.1 Training and advocacy ...................................................................................... 23 5.2 Hub training workshops and advocacy events ................................................... 24 5.2.1 Austria and Slovenia ........................................................................................... 25 5.2.2 Belgium and Luxembourg .................................................................................. 25 5.2.3 Bulgaria and Romania ........................................................................................ 25 5.2.4 Czech Republic ................................................................................................... 26 5.2.5 Denmark ............................................................................................................. 27 5.2.6 Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania .............................................................................. 28 5.2.7 France ................................................................................................................. 28 5.2.8 Germany ............................................................................................................. 29 5.2.9 Greece and Cyprus ............................................................................................. 29 5.2.10 Hungary ............................................................................................................ 29 5.2.11 Ireland .............................................................................................................. 30 5.2.12 Italy and Switzerland ........................................................................................ 31 5.2.13 Netherlands ...................................................................................................... 31 5.2.14 Poland............................................................................................................... 31 5.2.15 Portugal ............................................................................................................ 31 5.2.16 South Eastern Europe ....................................................................................... 32 5.2.17 Spain ................................................................................................................. 33 5.2.18 Sweden ............................................................................................................. 33 5.2.19 United Kingdom ............................................................................................... 34 5.3 International training workshops and advocacy events ...................................... 35 5.3.1 European Commission ....................................................................................... 35 5.3.2 SiS.net ................................................................................................................. 35 5.3.3 European Association of Research Managers and Administrators (EARMA) .... 35 3 D4.3 - Report on the training and advocacy programmes 5.3.4 Public Communication of Science and Technology (PCST) ................................ 36 5.3.5 Living Knowledge network ................................................................................. 36 5.3.6 European Collective of Science Centres and Museums (ECSITE) ....................... 36 5.3.7 European Citizen Science Association (ECSA) .................................................... 36 5.3.8 European Science Open Forum (ESOF) .............................................................. 36 5.3.9 Big Picnic ............................................................................................................ 37 5.3.10 Online training for Schools ................................................................................. 37 6 T 4.5 Review and update training (quality control) ......................................... 37 6.1 Standardisation of the modules ........................................................................ 37 6.2 Lessons learned ................................................................................................ 37 6.3 Conclusions ...................................................................................................... 38 7 Appendix ...................................................................................................... 39 I. Example Evaluation Report ............................................................................... 40 II. Full list of events 2015-2016 .............................................................................. 43 4 D4.3 - Report on the training and advocacy programmes 1 Introduction The RRI Tools training and advocacy programmes are designed to build a community that is knowledgeable about responsible research and innovation (RRI), that can explain it to others (thus enlarging the community), and argue for it in policy and funding forums. They also have the aim of making the RRI Tools project and the materials that it has produced and collected both visible and practically accessible to an audience as wide as possible. Workpackage 4 (WP) therefore builds on work done in WP1 – the development of a clear definition of RRI, the setting out of criteria for research and innovation activities to be considered “responsible” in the full sense of the word, and the compilation of “inspiring practices” that illustrate (aspects of) RRI –, in WP2 – mapping of obstacles, opportunities and needs for the various RRI stakeholders – and WP3 – the RRI Tools website/ Toolkit itself. WP4 has, by-and-large, fulfilled all of its objectives in a timely manner, with materials of good quality that can be used widely and meetings that range from one-on-one to close to 100 participants, with durations as short as an hour up to as long as three days. Where some adjustments to timing have been required, due to the overall Project development, it has not interfered with the fulfilment of the Project’s goals. It is also clear, however, that the training and advocacy resources produced under this WP could be much more fully exploited if future funding for staff and meetings were to be available. In the course of its work, RRI Tools has used a number of training approaches, developing new techniques to engage workshop participants, and to make the concepts underpinning RRI as accessible as possible. Advocacy discussions have ranged from civil servants and research team leaders and members to ministers responsible for science and education. Note: Rather than add bulk to this report, readers are referred to the RRI Tools website – particularly to the Training pages – for documents that are mentioned here. To allow for a simple comparison with the RRI Tools Description of Work (DoW), this report is structured along the same
Load more

Recommended publications
  • D7.8 EDU-ARCTIC List of Events and Publications Presenting the Project
    D7.8 EDU-ARCTIC List of events and publications presenting the project (Public) Project Acronym: EDU-ARCTIC Project Title: “Edu-Arctic – Innovative educational program attracting young people to natural sciences and polar research” NUMBER — 710240 — EDU-ARCTIC Document information summary Date: 30 May 2019 Leader Partner: UVSQ Main Author(s): Jan Borm Reviewed by: Agata Goździk Target audience: Consortium members and general public Delivery date: M37 Version: 1 This project (EDU-ARCTIC) has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 710240. The content of the document is the sole responsibility of the organizer and it does not represent the opinion of the European Commission, and the Commission is not responsible for any use that might be made of information contained. D7.8 List of events and publications EDU-ARCTIC No 710240 2 Table of Contents: Executive summary ................................................................................................................................. 3 List of events ........................................................................................................................................... 3 General Assemblies of the project: 3 Educators’ Fora: 3 Conferences and other public events: 4 Dissemination events 4 Events reported by the Institute of Geophysics Polish Academy of Sciences (65 in total) ............. 4 Events reported by the FAROESE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY (FINI) (23 in total) ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Our Food in Europe Eitfood.Eu
    The future of our food in Europe EITfood.eu EIT Food is supported by the EIT a body of the European Union 2 Content EIT Food’s Ambition 4 EIT Food Partners 6 RisingFoodStars 106 Let’s start engaging! 182 Teams 185 3 EIT Food’s Ambition EIT Food is a consortium of over 50 partners from leading businesses, research centres and universities across 13 countries. A people-centric and resource- smart transformer of the European food system, driving consumer confidence and improved global health. Goals and Impact EIT Food’s vision is to put Europe at the centre It aims to boost the skills and entrepreneurial of a global revolution in food innovation and spirit in the sector and unlock the potential of production, and its value in society. EIT Food small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs), will engage consumers in the change process, which in turn will accelerate innovation, create improve nutrition and make the food system jobs, benefit businesses and increase Europe’s more resource-efficient, secure, transparent competitiveness. and trusted. This will be achieved by: EIT Food has six strategic objectives: • Developing new talents: attract and 1. Overcome low consumer trust: support engage new talent through EIT Food Europeans in the transition towards a smart education programmes with curricula food system that is inclusive and trusted. designed to overcome the ‘silos’ of 2. Create consumer valued food for healthier knowledge and skills in specific areas of nutrition: enable individuals to make the food system. EIT Food will introduce informed and affordable personal nutrition new learning methods, entrepreneurial choices.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecsite Annual Conference 2011 Warsaw, Poland, 26-28 May PREFACE 3 Ective ff Nance Research,Nance fi Uence Governments, of Industries fl Welcome! Freedoms Meet and Clash
    Ecsite Annual Conference 2011 Warsaw, Poland, 26-28 May PREFACE hans gubbels Freedom is the theme of the 2011 catherine franche You will come across 1000 science robert firmhofer freedoms meet and clash. Are scientists Annual Conference. Freedom is what communication professionals from free to conduct the research that moves we all consider to be one of the most more than 50 countries. One thousand science forward? Is the society free to stop important assets in our lives: freedom people, yet a very friendly atmosphere the research violating its social or cultural PREFACE to choose, freedom of speech, freedom with plenty of occasions to meet and values? How do we deal with freedom from to access knowledge and freedom to mingle, to debate and discuss, to laugh the influence of governments, industries engage with other people. This is what and learn. and sponsors – those who finance research, we strive to offer our visitors every day. The theme this year is freedom. education and our activities? Are we free We must, however, accept that there As Victor Hugo wrote, “freedom enough to change the old and ineffective is often no ultimate freedom. We are starts where ignorance ends”, thus model of science education? responsible for our world and the describing the essence of your work Warsaw is THE location to discuss constraints and limitations it puts on as science communicators and of your freedom. It has struggled for freedom our freedom. A more integrated view contribution to freedom. Freedom can – let me just mention the Warsaw Uprising of freedom and morality can enhance be always threatened, and as recent in 1944 and the Solidarity movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Sense of Science Cities
    issue 92 autumn 2012 NEWSLETTER : CONTENTS >>> David Charles - English Science Making sense of science cities Cities: A new phase in science-based urban strategy? page 03 By Richard Tuffs, Director, European of interest to cities and science communication Regions Research and Innovation actors. Although the PLACES project already Ari Huczkowski - Science: Agent of economic development in Otaniemi involves over seventy cities across Europe, the Network (ERRIN), Brussels, Belgium page 05 third conference of PLACES, which will take place This edition of the Ecsite newsletter opens up a in Turin, Italy, in June 2013 will also be open to Ernesto Páramo - Granada’s science discussion on science cities and cities of scientific other cities and science communication actors city journey culture. As more and more cities develop science that contribute to the concept of a science city or page 07 centres and science museums and organise local a city of scientific culture2. science festivals, more research is examining the Listings reasons for such developments, how they are When designating six Science Cities in England in page 08 financed, and how their performance is evaluated. 2004, the UK government noted that “ ...In a These questions were, in fact, raised during the global economy, the UK’s ability to compete News from Ecsite first conference of the European project PLACES1 depends on our ability to exploit our excellent page 10 which seeks to define cities of scientific culture science base and capture the benefits of and examine the key criteria needed to develop innovation...”. The six Science Cities were to and define such cities.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2013
    Annual Report 2013 Visitors – 6 Exhibitions – 10 Laboratories – 24 “Heavens of Copernicus” Planetarium – 26 Events: • Science Picnic – 38 • Science Picnics abroad – 44 • After Hours – 46 • Summer in Discovery Park – 50 • Summer Cinema – 52 • Przemiany Festival – 54 • Warsaw Health Resort – 58 • Other Events – 60 Copernicus and Education • Average marks for playing bridge, or a teacher out of this world – 62 • Copernican Revolution – 64 • Show and Tell Conference – 66 • Young Explorer Club program – 68 • Educational Events – 70 Local partners – 74 International partners – 76 Notable visitors – 80 Sponsors – 82 Partners – 84 Copernicus Conference Centre – 86 Media – 88 Awards – 90 Our team – 92 For the third year running, the Copernicus truly cares about the This ongoing development is annual number of visitors to the social and cultural aspects of made possible by our working Our mission is to Copernicus Science Centre has learning and education. It sup- closely with a wide network of exceeded a million. This shows ports the formation of ecosys- partners: our Organizers, various that Copernicus isn’t popu- tems of people, organizations, universities and research insti- encourage personal lar simply because of being a spaces and contexts that foster tutes, nongovernmental organi- novelty, but rather because the collaboration and partnership, zations, science centres, schools Centre accurately recognizes communication and civic and and companies. Our activities engagement in discovering and meets public needs. social engagement. It helps culti- would also not be able to grow vate the culture of science, since were it not for all the creative So, what are those needs? First the way in which scientists work people who are personally and and understanding the and foremost, people’s desire to (seeking the truth, focusing on actively engaged in pursuing our actively discover the world, and facts, respecting others) can and mission: to encourage people to to shape it creatively.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017
    67th Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting 6th Lindau Meeting on Economic Sciences Annual Report 2017 The Lindau Nobel Laureate Meetings Contents »67 th Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting (Chemistry) »6th Lindau Meeting on Economic Sciences Over the last 67 years, more than 450 Nobel Laureates have come 67th Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting (Chemistry) Science as an Insurance Policy Against the Risks of Climate Change 10 The Interdependence of Research and Policymaking 82 to Lindau to meet the next generation of leading scientists. 25–30 June 2017 Keynote by Nobel Laureate Steven Chu Keynote by ECB President Mario Draghi The laureates shape the scientific programme with their topical #LiNo17 preferences. In various session types, they teach and discuss Opening Ceremony 14 Opening Ceremony 86 scientific and societal issues and provide invaluable feedback Scientific Chairpersons to the participating young scientists. – Astrid Gräslund, Professor of Biophysics, Department of New Friends Across Borders 16 An Inspiring Hothouse of Intergenerational 88 Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, Sweden By Scientific Chairpersons Astrid Gräslund and Wolfgang Lubitz and Cross-Cultural Exchange Outstanding scientists and economists up to the age of 35 are – Wolfgang Lubitz, Director, Max Planck Institute By Scientific Chairpersons Torsten Persson and Klaus Schmidt invited to take part in the Lindau Meetings. The participants for Chemical Energy Conversion, Germany Nobel Laureates 18 include undergraduates, PhD students as well as post-doctoral Laureates 90 researchers. In order to participate in a meeting, they have to Nominating Institutions 22 pass a multi-step application and selection process. 6th Lindau Meeting on Economic Sciences Nominating Institutions 93 22–26 August 2017 Young Scientists 23 #LiNoEcon Young Economists 103 Scientific Chairpersons SCIENTIFIC PROGRAMME – Martin F.
    [Show full text]
  • Science Education in Europe: National Policies, Practices Aand Research
    Science Education in Europe: National Policies, Practices aand Research BG European Commission Science Education in Europe: National Policies, Practices and Research This document is published by the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA P9 Eurydice). Available in English (Science Education in Europe: National Policies, Practices and Research), French (L'enseignement des sciences en Europe: politiques nationales, pratiques et recherche) and German (Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht in Europa: Politische Maßnahmen, Praktiken und Forschung). ISBN 978-92-9201-218-2 doi:10.2797/7170 This document is also available on the Internet (http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice). Text completed in October 2011. © Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency, 2011. The contents of this publication may be reproduced in part, except for commercial purposes, provided the extract is preceded by a reference to 'Eurydice network', followed by the date of publication of the document. Requests for permission to reproduce the entire document must be made to EACEA P9 Eurydice. Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency P9 Eurydice Avenue du Bourget 1 (BOU2) B-1140 Brussels Tel. +32 2 299 50 58 Fax +32 2 292 19 71 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice FOREWORD A basic understanding of science is considered a necessary skill for every European citizen. Concerns about low student performance in basic skills, as revealed by international surveys, led to the adoption in 2009 of an EU-wide benchmark which states that 'by 2020 the share of 15-year-olds with insufficient abilities in reading, mathematics and science should be less than 15 %' (1).
    [Show full text]
  • Chain Reaction Final Report
    FINAL REPORT Grant Agreement number: 321278 Project acronym: CHREACT Project title: Chain Reaction Funding Scheme: FP7-SCIENCE IN SOCIETY-2013-1 Period covered: From 01/12/2014 to 30/05/2016 Authors: Eleanor Byrne, Josephine Booth, Stuart Bevins & Andrew Bullough Contents Page 1. Publishable summary 2 2. Project objectives for the period 11 2.1 Overview 11 2.2 Project Objectives for the period (01/06/13-30/11/14) 11 2.3 Follow-up of previous review 11 3. Work progress and achievements during the period 12 3.1 Progress overview and contribution to the research field 12 4. Work packages progress 12 4.1 Work Package 1 - Project Management 12, 84 4.2 Work Package 2 - Website Development 12 4.3 Work Package 3 - Technical Board (TB) Role 19 4.4 Work Package 4 - National EUPRB Development and annual revision 21 4.5 Work Package 5 - Teacher IBSE/EUPRB Briefing 26 4.6 Work Package 6 - In school delivery 33 4.7 Work Package 7 – Conferences 41 4.8 Work Package 8 - Impact and Dissemination 49 4.9 Work Package 9 – Evaluation 72 5. Deliverables and milestones tables 79 5.1 Deliverables 79 5.2 Milestones 80 6. Project management 83 6.1 Management activities 83 6.2 Dissemination and use of the knowledge 87 7. Explanation of the use of the resources 88 7.1 Planned versus Actual effort 89 8. Financial Statements – Form C and Summary Financial Report 90 8.1 Certificates on the Financial Statements 90 9. Appendices 106 1 Publishable summary A summary description of the project context and the main objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Report from the European Particle Physics Communication Network
    CERN/SPC/1130 CERN/3455 Original: English 13 September 2019 ORGANISATION EUROPÉENNE POUR LA RECHERCHE NUCLÉAIRE CERN EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH Action to be taken Voting Procedure SCIENTIFIC POLICY COMMITTEE For information 315th Meeting - 23-24 September 2019 RESTRICTED COUNCIL EUROPEAN STRATEGY MATTERS For information - 194th Session 27 September 2019 REPORT FROM THE EUROPEAN PARTICLE PHYSICS COMMUNICATION NETWORK CERN/SPC/1130 1 CERN/3455 Report from the European Particle Physics Communication Network 1. Overview This document begins with a brief report on the work of CERN’s Education, Communications and Outreach (IR-ECO) group before moving on to reports of network activity by country. It covers the period from August 2018 to July 2019. 2. Status of the network Over the past year, the EPPCN Social Media and the EPPCN KT working groups joined forces for a social media campaign on the occasion of the International day of Women and Girls in Science (#WomenInScience). The EPPCN held its spring meeting in Granada alongside the Open Symposium for the update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics. Some members of the network met the European Strategy Update working group 5 on Education, Communication and Outreach. A communication plan for the Strategy Update has been designed by CERN with input from the network. Two EPPCN members started a review of the IR-REL Country pages to see how the visibility of Member and Associate Members States on new CERN’s website could be improved. Work is still ongoing. Regarding the representation of the Member States in the EPPCN, the positions for Belgium, Denmark and Hungary remain vacant.
    [Show full text]
  • POLISH ACADEMY of SCIENCES 2016
    2016 POLISH ACADEMY of SCIENCES 2016 Contents Foreword by Professor Jerzy Duszyński, Medical Sciences ������������������������������������������������ 57 President of the Academy ����������������������������������� 3 Polish Young Academy ������������������������������������� 73 Presidium of the Polish Academy of Sciences ���� 4 International Relations ������������������������������������� 81 General Assembly of the Polish Academy of Sciences ���������������������������������������������������������� 6 Educational and Promotional Activity ������������� 90 Members of the Polish Academy of Sciences ����� 7 The FNP Prizes for 2015 ���������������������������������� 98 Humanities and Social Sciences ������������������������� 12 Selected Statistics ��������������������������������������������� 101 Biological and Agricultural Sciences ������������������ 25 Foreign Scientific Centers �������������������������������� 103 Mathematics, Physics, Research Units and Branches ��������������������������� 104 Chemistry and Earth Sciences ��������������������������� 36 Scientific and Task-Force Committees ������������� 110 Engineering Sciences ����������������������������������������� 47 Scientific Council: © Copyright 2016 Edward Nęcka – Editor-in-Chief Polish Academy of Sciences Stanisław Filipowicz Communications and Science Andrzej Jerzmanowski Promotion Department Paweł Kulesza Polish Academy of Sciences Antoni Rogalski PKiN, Pl. Defilad 1, 00-901 Warsaw, Poland Jacek Zaremba www.pan.pl Published by: ISSN 1640-3754 Communications and Science Promotion
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom Dom Freedom
    Ecsite – the European network of science centres and museums FreeFreedom dom Freedom Ecsite Annual Conference 2011, preliminary programme Centre Science Copernicus Poland, Warsaw, 2011, May 26-28 PREFACE Dear Friends, Another year has passed and it seems like yesterday that we met in Dortmund to exchange ideas, to learn from each other, to be inspired in workshops and to have great fun in the evening events. I hope you all had the opportunity to bring those new insights into practice during last year and feel ready for Ecsite’s 22nd Annual Conference. This year we are moving more to the east. The Annual Confer- ence 2011 is hosted in Warsaw, Poland, in the recently opened and impressive Copernicus Science Centre. This new institution will give the Polish people the freedom to explore the connec- tions between science, the humanities and art. Freedom is the theme of the 2011 Annual Conference. Freedom is what we all consider to be one of the most important assets in our lives: freedom to choose, freedom of speech, freedom to ac- cess knowledge and freedom to engage with other people. This is what we strive to offer our visitors every day. We must, however, accept that there is often no ultimate freedom. We are responsible for our world and the constraints and limita- tions it puts on our freedom. A more integrated view of freedom hans gubbels and morality can enhance our understanding; moral mecha- nisms have a clear social function that science can help us to president of ecsite, understand and improve. We may not be free in the exceptional, continium discovery centre, ultimate sense we sometimes suppose, but we are more than kerkrade, netherlands compensated by pragmatic benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • List Dissemination Activities.Pdf
    LIST DISSEMINATION ACTIVITIES GRAND ACCELERATEUR NATIONAL 1 Exhibitions Fête de la Science 24/10/2010 Caen, France Civil society 10000 France D'IONS LOURDS Organisation of 2 KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT LEUVEN Vlaamse Wetenschapsweek 22/11/2010 Leuven, Belgium Civil society 107 Belgium Workshops GRAND ACCELERATEUR NATIONAL 3 Exhibitions Fête de la Science 16/10/2011 Caen, France Civil society 10000 France D'IONS LOURDS Civil society - 4 Web sites/Applications UNIVERSITAET BASEL Weltenreise 02/11/2011 Basel, Switzerland Switzerland Medias Imeche Evening Lecture: Oral presentation to a 5 THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER Fukushima and the UK?S Nuclear 18/01/2012 Manchester, UK Civil society 60 UK wider public Future Oral presentation to a 6 THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER ICE Big Nuclear Debate 06/02/2012 London, UK Civil society 120 UK wider public Oral presentation to a 7 THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER School of Physics Rutherford Day 07/02/2012 Manchester, UK Civil society 75 UK wider public IET Evening Lecture: Safe Nuclear Oral presentation to a 8 THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER Reactors in a Post Fukushima 08/02/2012 Bangor, UK Civil society 45 UK wider public World "View into the atom - spectroscopy" Oral presentation to a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITAET 9 and "Particle traps and 18/02/2012 Mainz, Germany Civil society 500 Germany wider public MAINZ accelerators" Rätselhafte Elemententstehung im Civil society - 10 Interviews UNIVERSITAET BASEL 28/02/2012 Basel, Switzerland Switzerland Weltall Medias ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DI FISICA 11 Posters Esploratori
    [Show full text]