DOCSLIB.ORG

Wo 2011/083363 A2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wo 2011/083363 A2 (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date 14 July 2011 (14.07.2011) WO 2011/083363 A2 (51) International Patent Classification: (72) Inventors; and A01P 13/00 (2006.01) A01N 65/40 (2009.01) (75) Inventors/Applicants (for US only): TORRES, Frank, A01N 65/38 (2009.01) A01N 65/00 (2009.01) Lopez [CR/CR]; 400 S Iglesia Catolica, Sitio de Mata, Pavones, Turrialba/Cartago 30506 (CR). ORTUNO VI- (21) International Application Number: COTRY, Felipe [CR/CR]; 400 S. Iglesia Catolica, Sitio PCT/IB20 10/003350 de Mata, Pavones, Turrialba/Cartago 30506 (CR). (22) International Filing Date: VALVERDE, Bernal, E. [CR/CR]; 300 Oeste Iglesia, 23 December 2010 (23.12.2010) Tambor/Alajuela 201 12 (CR). (25) Filing Language: English (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, (26) Publication Language: English AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BR, BW, BY, BZ, (30) Priority Data: CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO, 61/290,043 24 December 2009 (24.12.2009) US DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, 61/344,1 76 4 June 2010 (04.06.2010) US HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, (71) Applicant (for all designated States except US): EL ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, PERTIGUERO, S.A. [CR/CR]; Barrio La California, NO, NZ, OM, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, RO, RS, RU, SC, SD, Condominios Dona Lolita, Piso 3 Oficina 9, San Jose SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, (CR). TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. [Continued on next page] (54) Title: BROAD SPECTRUM HERBICIDE AND PLANT REGULATOR COMPOSITIONS (57) Abstract: The invention is directed to compositions and methods for controlling unwanted plants, hi one aspect, the inven tion is directed to a broad spectrum herbicide composition, in which the herbicide composition has extracts of at least two source plants or parts of plants and upon application to a target plant is translocated at least in part through the xylem and/or phloem. The invention is also directed to an environmentally friendly broad spectrum systemic plant function regulator composition having a mixture of extracts of plants and which substantially lacks glyphosate on a weight basis. The herbicide composition can be in effective on plants having 5-enolpyruvyl shikimic acid-3- phos phate synthase from Agrobacterium . The invention is also directed to a process of making the herbicide and plant function regulator compositions and to methods of using them. w o 2011/083363 A : llll II II 11III II I III III II II II III II I II (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every SM, TR), OAPI (BF, BJ, CF, CG, CI, CM, GA, GN, GQ, kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, GW, ML, MR, NE, SN, TD, TG). GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, ML, NA, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, UG, Published: ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, MD, RU, TJ, TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, without international search report and to be republished EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, IE, IS, IT, LT, LU, upon receipt of that report (Rule 48.2(g)) LV, MC, MK, MT, NL, NO, PL, PT, RO, RS, SE, SI, SK, Broad Spectrum Herbicide and Plant Regulator Compositions RELATED APPLICATIONS [0001] This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Applications 61/290,043, filed December 24, 2009, and 61/344,176, filed June 4, 2010, each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. FIELD [0002] The application is generally directed to plant herbicides and plant extracts that regulate plant growth. More particularly, the application discloses- an herbicide composition suitable for use in conventional or organic agriculture, or other uses in an environmentally friendly manner, methods of using the herbicide composition, and methods of making the herbicide composition. BACKGROUND [0003] Broad spectrum herbicides are widely used in agriculture to inhibit the growth or spread of unwanted competing plants, termed weeds, to prepare fields for seeding, and to favor transgenic plants having resistance genes. Herbicides can be used before the weeds emerge (pre-emergence) or after the weeds germinate (post-emergence). Herbicides are further classified as systemic or contact herbicides. Contact herbicides act primarily on the part of the plant to which the herbicide is applied. Systemic herbicides are transported within the plant vascular system(s) and affect most or all the plant, including the root. In general, contact herbicides have a more rapid effect than systemic herbicides, but are generally less effective in killing perennial plants. [0004] Moreover, synthetic herbicides cannot be used in organic agriculture. Major agricultural nations have regulations governing materials suitable for use in agriculture. In the USA, the Department of Agriculture provides the National List of Allowed and Prohibited Substances for organic agriculture and other countries have regulations for similar purposes. [0005] Prominent synthetic herbicides include systemic compounds such as glyphosate (ROUNDUP®), which dominates the market, atrazine, sulfonylureas such as chlorsulfuron, aryloxyphenoxypropanoates such as diclofop, and contact herbicides including glufosinate, paraquat, and diquat. The widespread use of these herbicides has led to serious problems, including evolution of resistant weeds, drift of herbicide spray into unwanted areas onto desirable plants, and contamination of ground water. Toxic effects in mammals have led to a program for phase-out of paraquat in Europe and restriction on use in Japan. [0006] Natural products have been used in agriculture. Coleman et al. disclose organic acids or salts and herbicides. Weed Technology 22: 38 (2008). Hansson et al. disclose phytotoxicity of Brassicaceae seed meals. J. Agric. Food Chem. 56: 3912 (2008). Coleman et al. disclose desiccant activity of short chain fatty acids and comparison to paraquat and glufosinate. Weed Technology 20: 410 (2006). Anjum et al. showed the allelopathic potential of Helianthus annuus L. (sunflower) extracts as a natural herbicide. Fourth World Conference on Allelopathy (2005). Leu et al. published that polyphenolic allelochemicals inhibit photosystem II. Plant Physiology 130:2011 (2002). Reigosa et al. showed the effect of several allelochemicals on plant photosynthesis and growth. Allelopathy J. 8: 2 11 (2001). Hejl et al. found that juglone inhibited photosynthesis and plant growth. J. Chem. Ecology 19: 559 (1993). Einhellig et al. found that sorgoleone inhibits photosynthesis and carbon dioxide-dependent oxygen evolution. J. Chem. Ecology 19: 369 (1993). Heisey found that extracts of Ailanthus altissima inhibited seed germination and seedling growth. Amer. J. Bot. 77: 662 (1990). [0007] Moreover, WO2008 141252 is directed to herbicides having oxidized clove or cinnamon oil. JP2008050329 is directed to an extract of pine tree, hinoki tree, or Japanese cedar with bamboo vinegar, as an herbicide. DK200601016 (WO2008011882) is directed to an extract of garlic, cayenne, and nettles, in combination with dextrose. US2006199739 is directed to use of an herbicide having D-limonene. CN1555710 is directed to an extract of cephalotaxus. US2004121914 is directed to a combined herbicide and fertilizer. US2004028748 is directed to a composition having sodium dodecyl sulfate, vinegar, and salt. US6602824 is directed to an herbicidal composition and a method of using a naturally-occurring organic compound, such as glycine betaine, as an herbicide. US20060 194698 is directed to methods for controlling weeds. US62 18336 is directed to herbicides. US20090099022 is directed to a natural herbicide containing lemongrass essential oil. US200901 11697 is directed to propionic acid as an herbicide. US20090029856 is directed to hinokitiol as a plant pesticide and herbicide. US20070281857 is directed to formic acid as an herbicide. US20070249699 is directed to pesticide compositions and methods for their use. US20040 186022 is directed to enhanced herbicides. WO9417070-A discloses new or known anthraquinone or aza- xanthone derivatives that can be useful as herbicides and plant growth regulators. KR2004064795-A, KR460437-B, and US2006240120-A1 teach an extract of Ligularia stenocephala with weed killing activity. See also Cantrell et al., (2007) Phytotoxic Eremophilanes from Ligularia macrophylla. J. Agric. Food Chem. 55:10656-10663. CN1 Oil 2068 8-A discloses preparing herbicide miscible oil for controlling crabgrass by extracting Flaveria bidentis plant using an organic solvent to obtain an extract, concentrating and dissolving extract with xylene and adding pesticide adjuvant to extract. IN200700 199-11 is directed to an herbicidal composition and its preparation process. JP2008050329-A teaches an organic herbicide useful for killing Elaphe quadrivirgata, dragonfly, water beetle, diving beetle, and Laccotrephes japonensis in a paddy field, and contains a component extracted from plants. KR2007065942-A discloses an extract obtained from Sicyos angulatus I. with herbicidal activity, and a method for preparing the extract and an herbicidal composition comprising the extract. WO2003056916-A, EP1427283-A4, WO2003056916-A3, WO2003056916-A2, AU2002365243-A1, EP1427283-A2, US2005043178-A1, and ZA200402155-A disclose an herbicidal composition for controlling growth of weeds e.g. Linaria dalmatica and for inhibiting growth of bacterium e.g. Xanthomonas campestris in plants, comprising an exudate of Centaurea maculosa. JP7002734-A and JP95064779-B2 describe a new 3-hydroxy-5- methoxy-stilbene-2-carboxylic acid that is extracted from the leaves or stems of Cajanus plants and used as a low toxicity herbicide. JP6128109-A and JP2971268-B2 disclose herbicides for removal of weeds from lawns and containing coumarin and that can be obtained from Anthoxanthum odoratum. A paper by Haig et al. discloses that an extract of Lavandula spp.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Common and Chemical Names of Herbicides Approved by the WSSA
    Weed Science 2010 58:511–518 Common and Chemical Names of Herbicides Approved by the Weed Science Society of America Below is the complete list of all common and chemical of herbicides as approved by the International Organization names of herbicides approved by the Weed Science Society of for Standardization (ISO). A sponsor may submit a proposal America (WSSA) and updated as of September 1, 2010. for a common name directly to the WSSA Terminology Beginning in 1996, it has been published yearly in the last Committee. issue of Weed Science with Directions for Contributors to A herbicide common name is not synonymous with Weed Science. This list is published in lieu of the selections a commercial formulation of the same herbicide, and in printed previously on the back cover of Weed Science. Only many instances, is not synonymous with the active ingredient common and chemical names included in this complete of a commercial formulation as identified on the product list should be used in WSSA publications. In the absence of label. If the herbicide is a salt or simple ester of a parent a WSSA-approved common name, the industry code number compound, the WSSA common name applies to the parent as compiled by the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) with compound only. CAS systematic chemical name or the systematic chemical The chemical name used in this list is that preferred by the name alone may be used. The current approved list is also Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) according to their system of available at our web site (www.wssa.net).
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Review of Controlling Aquatic Invasive Vegetation With
    Eurasian watermilfoil in Christmas Lake, 2011 Literature Review on Controlling Aquatic Invasive Vegetation with Aquatic Herbicides Compared to Other Control Methods: Effectiveness, Impacts, and Costs Prepared for: Prepared by: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Steve McComas Blue Water Science St. Paul, MN 55116 September 2011 1 Literature Review on Controlling Aquatic Invasive Vegetation with Aquatic Herbicides Compared to Other Control Methods: Effectiveness, Impacts, and Costs Steve McComas, Blue Water Science Table of Contents page number Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Use of Herbicides as an Aquatic Plant Control Technique ...................................................................................... 2 How Herbicides Work and Their Mode of Action ....................................................................................................... 3 Aquatic Herbicide Impacts on Humans and the Ecosystem ....................................................................................... 8 Where to Find Sources of Specific Information on herbicide Products and Their Active Ingredients ....................... 16 Harvesting, Drawdown, and Biocontrol as Aquatic Plant Control Techniques ................................................... 17 Summary of Control Techniques for Non-Native Curlyleaf Pondweed and Eurasian Watermilfoil ................... 25 Control Techniques for Other
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the 52Nd Meeting of The
    DRAFTS MINUTES OF 52nd MEETING OF THE CENTRAL INSECTICIDES BOARD (CIB) HELD ON 12.01.2016 at RESOURCE CENTRE, ROOM NO. 445, ‘A’ WING, NIRMAN BHAWAN, NEW DELHI. The 52nd Meeting of Central Insecticides Board (CIB) was held on 12.01.2016 at 11.00 AM at Resource Centre, Room No. 445, ‘A’ Wing, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi under the chairmanship of Dr. Jagdish Prasad, Director General of Health Services, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare. Since the quorum was not complete, meeting was adjourned for half an hour and reconvened at 11.30AM, The list of the participants is at Annexure-I. The Chairman welcomed the participants. After formal self-introduction by the participants, the Chairman requested the APPA & Secretary, CIB & RC, to present the agenda. After detailed deliberation on each issue, the following decisions were taken: - Agenda Item No. 1: Confirmation of minutes of 51st meeting of CIB held on 04.03.2015 As no comments were received on the minutes, the st minutes of 51 meeting of Central Insecticides Board were confirmed. Agenda Item No. 2: Follow up action on the decisions of 51st meeting of the CIB. The Board noted the follow up actions on the decisions st of 51 meeting with satisfaction and appreciated the efforts made to complete the action in time bound manner. Agenda Item No. 3: Progress report of the Registration Committee, Central Insecticides Laboratory and Regional Pesticides Testing Laboratories. a. Registration Committee: The Board was happy to note the progress of the Sectt. of CIB&RC and burst in to applaud and congratulated the APPA & Secretary, CIB&RC for achieving this mile stone while bringing the pendency at a very manageable level.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Pesticide Evaluation Report and Safe Use and Action Plan (Persuap) for Usaid Funded Feed the Future Ghana Agricultural
    REVIEW OF PESTICIDE EVALUATION REPORT AND SAFE USE AND ACTION PLAN (PERSUAP) FOR USAID FUNDED FEED THE FUTURE GHANA AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT AND VALUE CHAIN ENHANCEMENT PROJECT (FTF ADVANCE II) NOVEMBER 2019 PROJECT/ACTIVITY DATA Project/Activity Name: Feed The Future Ghana Agricultural Development and Value Chain Enhancement Activity (FTF ADVANCE II) Amendment (Y/N): Y Geographic Location(s) Ghana, Northern Region, Tamale / West Africa (Country/Region): Implementation Start/End: February 2014 to April 2020 Organizational/Administrative Data Implementing Operating Unit USAID Ghana Feed the Future Program Funding Amount: $39,556,780 Prepared by: Gerald Asare MANTEY, Environmental and Plant Health Specialist with assistance from Daniel Kofi Agyare and Michael Afranie. Date Prepared: August, 2019 ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION RECOMMENDED (Place X where applicable) Categorical Exclusion: N/A Negative Determination: X Positive Determination: N/A Deferral: N/A ADDITIONAL ELEMENTS: (Place X where applicable) CONDITIONS: X PVO/NGO: X EMMP (SUAP): X ERR: Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 7 PART 1: INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Project Background .......................................................................................................... 8 1.2 Objectives ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • China Releases New Maximum Residue Limits for Pesticides In
    GB 2763-2016 THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY Voluntary - Public Date: 3/31/2017 GAIN Report Number: CH17016 China - Peoples Republic of Post: Beijing China Releases New Maximum Residue Limits for Pesticides in Food Report Categories: FAIRS Subject Report Approved By: Lisa Anderson Prepared By: FAS Staff Report Highlights: On December 18, 2016, the Chinese National Health and Family Planning Commission, Ministry of Agriculture, China Food and Drug Administration released the National Food Safety Standard - Maximum Residue Limits for Pesticides in Foods (GB 2763-2016). The standard will replace the current MRL Standard (GB 2763-2014) and will be implemented on June 18, 2017. This report provides an unofficial translation of the standard. Editors’ Note: The asterisk appearing in the MRL column means that the limit is a temporary MRL. A temporary MRL is usually set under the following four conditions: 1. The dietary risk assessment data is incomplete; 2. The Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) is temporary (ADI is used as the basis for MRL setting); 3. There is no surveillance or analysis method for the MRL that complies with the standard requirements; 4. In emergency situations, the pesticide is approved to be used on un-registered crops. I GB 2763-2016 General Information: BEGIN TRANSLATION ICS 65.100 G 25 GB National Standard of the People’s Republic of China GB 2763—2016 Replacing GB 2763 - 2014 National food safety standard Maximum Residue Limits for Pesticides in Food General Information: National Health and Family Planning Commission Issued by: Ministry of Agriculture China Food and Drug Administration Issued on: 2016-12-18 Implementation:2017-06-18 II GB 2763-2016 Table of Content Preface ...............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Post Emergence Herbicides on Weed Control, Performance and Profitability of Rice (Oryza Sativa) at Lafiagi, Kwara State of Nigeria
    Libyan Agriculture Research Center Journal International 3 (5): 236-240, 2012 ISSN 2219-4304 © IDOSI Publications, 2012 DOI: 10.5829/idosi.larcji.2012.3.5.1105 Evaluation of Post Emergence Herbicides on Weed Control, Performance and Profitability of Rice (Oryza sativa) at Lafiagi, Kwara State of Nigeria Ibrahim Usman College of Agriculture, Ahmadu Bello University, Samaru, Zaria, Nigeria Abstract: Field experiments were conducted in 2009 and 2010 wet seasons at Lafiagi, Kwara state in the Northern Guinea Savannah of Nigeria to evaluate the effect of some post emergence herbicides on weed control, performance and profitability of rice. The treatments consisted of four post emergence herbicides (450g pretilachlor + 30g pyribenzoxim, 3600g propanil + 2000g 2, 4-Dichlorophenoxy acetic acid, 40g bisbyribac sodium and 1020g pretilachlor + 1980g propanil), two hoe weeding at 6 and 9 WAS and the unweeded plot. The application rates were based on the manufacturers’ recommendations. The treatments were laid out in a randomized complete block design replicated three times. Data on weed cover score, weed dry matter, crop injury, crop vigour, crop stand and grain yields were collected. Gross margin and cost benefit analysis were employed to determine the profitability of each of the control methods. From the results all the herbicides were similar in their effect on weed control and crop growth. The effect of herbicide treatments on rice yield were comparable to hoe weeding and significantly higher than unweeded treatments. The application of 40g/lha 1 of bisbyribac sodium and application of 450g pretilachlor + 30g pyribenzoxim as post emergence herbicides applied at 6 WAS gave the highest gross margin and Cost- benefit ratio over hand weeding respectively and are therefore considered as the best post emergence herbicides in rice among the evaluated herbicides in the study area.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 3-E
    Certified Crop Science Consultant Program Appendix 3-E Herbicide, Insecticide, and Fungicide Groups Based on Mode of Action Table 3E-1. Herbicide Groups Based on Mode of Action Group Mode of Action Chemical Family Active Ingredient 1 Inhibitors of acetyl CoA Aryloxyphenoxy propionate clodinafop-propargyl, cyhalofop-butyl, carboxylase (ACCase) ‘FOPs’ diclofop-methyl, fenoxaprop-P-ethyl, fluazifop-P-butyl, haloxyfop-R-methyl, propaquizafop, quizalofop-P-ethyl Cyclohexanedione alloxydim, butroxydim, clethodim, ‘DIMs’ cyclosydim, profoxydim, sethoxydim, tepraloxydim, tralkoxydim 2 Inhibit acetolactate synthase Sulfonylureas amidosulfuron, azimsulfuron, (ALS) also called bensulfuron-methyl, chlorimuron-ethyl, acetohydroxy-acid synthase chlorsulfuron, cinosulfuron, (AHAS) cyclosulfamuron, ethametsulfuron-methyl, ethoxysulfuron, flazasulfuron, flupyrsulfuron-methyl-Na, foramsulfuron, halosulfuron-methyl, imazosulfuron, iodosulfuron, mesosulfuron, metsulfuron- methyl, nicosulfuron, oxasulfuron, primisulfuron-methyl, prosulfuron, pyrazosulfuron-ethyl, rimsulfuron, sulfometuron-methyl, sulfosulfuron, thifensulfuron-methyl, triasulfuron, tribenuron-methyl, trifloxysulfuron, triflusulfuron-methyl, tritosulfuron Imidazoilinone Imazapic, imazamethabenz-methyl, imazamox, imazapyr, imazaquin, imazethapyr Triazolopyrimidines cloransulam-methyl, diclosulam, florasulam, flumetsulam, metosulam, penoxsulam Pyrimidinyl(thio)benzoates bispyribac-Na, pyribenzoxim, pyriftalid, pyrithiobac-Na, pyriminobac-methyl Sulfonylaminocarbonyl- flucarbazone-Na, procarbazone-Na
    [Show full text]
  • Illegal Pesticide Trade in the Mekong Countries: Case of Lao Pdr
    ILLEGAL PESTICIDE TRADE IN THE MEKONG COUNTRIES: CASE OF LAO PDR Vientiane Capital and provinces of Louang Namtha and Xiengkhouang By Chela Vázquez Pesticides on the left counter sold with other stuff, Vientiane Capital, Lao PDR Reports on the increasing use of pesticides in Lao PDR (van der Wulp 2006; Lao-FAO IPM and FAO Pesticide Risk Reduction Programme 2009, 2011; FAO IPM Vegetable Regional Programme 2010) have raised the alarm about the use of highly hazardous pesticides (HHPs) by farmers wearing little or no protection. Some of these pesticides, i.e., paraquat and methomyl, have been banned in the country. Lao does not produce active ingredients or pesticide formulations. Nearly all pesticides sold and used in Lao originate from Thailand and China, and to some extent from Vietnam. Lao, as with most non-industrialized countries, lacks the technology to dispose of pesticides safely. Thus, enforcing pesticide regulations, for example by confiscating illegal pesticides, becomes a challenge in the absence of adequate technology to dispose of hazardous products. Regional cooperation among countries is needed, especially from the pesticide manufacturing countries in order to protect communities from toxic chemicals and to enforce national laws. Pesticide manufacturing countries should take measures to both 1) prevent exports of pesticides to countries which have banned them, and 2) accept returned chemicals from countries where they have been confiscated by government authorities. The Strategic Approach on International Chemicals Management (SAICM) offers an adequate framework to advance an international policy mechanism to curtail the illegal flow of pesticides. Furthermore, international donors and development agencies should support government policies that promote sustainable agriculture, free of hazardous chemicals, which reduces the incentive for illegal trade.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2016/115709 Al 28 July 2016 (28.07.2016) W P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2016/115709 Al 28 July 2016 (28.07.2016) W P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every A01N 43/42 (2006.01) A01N 43/76 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, A01N 47/36 (2006.01) A01N 43/40 (2006.01) AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, A01N 43/54 (2006.01) A01N 43/78 (2006.01) BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, A 39/04 (2006.01) A01P 13/00 (2006.01) DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, (21) International Application Number: KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, PCT/CN20 15/07 1348 MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, (22) International Filing Date: PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, 22 January 2015 (22.01 .2015) SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (25) Filing Language: English (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (26) Publication Language: English kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, (71) Applicant: HICAP FORMULATIONS (HONG KONG) GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, LTD.
    [Show full text]
  • Farmer to Farmer Programmatic Pesticide Evaluation Report and Safe
    RAISE PLUS-Limited scope of work IQC FARMER TO FARMER PROGRAMMATIC PESTICIDE EVALUATION REPORT AND SAFE USE ACTION PLAN (PERSUAP) i Contract No.: AEG-I-18-04-00010-00 Prepared: December 2009 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Weidemann Associates, Inc. DISCLAIMER The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. ii PROGRAMMATIC PESTICIDE EVALUATION REPORT and SAFE USE ACTION PLAN (PERSUAP) Activity Location: Global: activities in over 30 countries including Egypt, Lebanon, Ghana, Mali, Nigeria, Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Georgia, Moldova, Tajikistan, Serbia, Uzbekistan, Angola, Malawi, Mozambique, Dominican Republic, Guyana, Haiti, Nicaragua, South Africa, Belarus, Dominic, Grenada, Mexico, Guatemala, El Salvador, Peru, Colombia, Bolivia, Dominican Republic, Sumatra, Ethiopia, Uganda, St. Kitts and Nevis Activity Title: John Ogonowski Farmer-to-Farmer Volunteer Programs Life of Project: FY 2009-FY 2013 Program Funding: $75 million iii Contents Pesticide Evaluation Report ........................................................................................................................ 1 Summary of Findings ..............................................................................................................................................3 Summary of Recommendations ..............................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2010/147966 Al
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date 23 December 2010 (23.12.2010) WO 2010/147966 Al (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every AOlN 43/80 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BR, BW, BY, BZ, (21) International Application Number: CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO, PCT/US2010/038646 DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, (22) International Filing Date: HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, 15 June 2010 (15.06.2010) KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, (25) Filing Language: English NO, NZ, OM, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, RO, RS, RU, SC, SD, (26) Publication Language: English SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (30) Priority Data: 61/187,054 15 June 2009 (15.06.2009) US (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, (71) Applicant (for all designated States except US): ACCU- GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, UG, FORM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC [US/US]; 3225 Dem- ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, MD, RU, TJ, ing Way, Suite 140B, Middleton, Wisconsin 53562 (US).
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Pesticide Chemicals
    Glossary of Pesticide Chemicals October 2001 Table of Contents Glossary Index A.................................................4 A...............................................10 B.................................................9 B...............................................12 C...............................................16 C................................................14 D...............................................29 D...............................................18 E...............................................41 E...................................................21 F................................................46 F................................................23 G...............................................58 G................................................24 H...............................................60 H...............................................25 I................................................62 I.................................................26 J................................................68 J................................................26 K...............................................68 K...............................................26 L................................................68 L................................................27 M...............................................69 M...............................................27 N...............................................79 N...............................................30 O................................................82
    [Show full text]