DOCSLIB.ORG

Minutes of the 52Nd Meeting of The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DRAFTS MINUTES OF 52nd MEETING OF THE CENTRAL INSECTICIDES BOARD (CIB) HELD ON 12.01.2016 at RESOURCE CENTRE, ROOM NO. 445, ‘A’ WING, NIRMAN BHAWAN, NEW DELHI. The 52nd Meeting of Central Insecticides Board (CIB) was held on 12.01.2016 at 11.00 AM at Resource Centre, Room No. 445, ‘A’ Wing, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi under the chairmanship of Dr. Jagdish Prasad, Director General of Health Services, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare. Since the quorum was not complete, meeting was adjourned for half an hour and reconvened at 11.30AM, The list of the participants is at Annexure-I. The Chairman welcomed the participants. After formal self-introduction by the participants, the Chairman requested the APPA & Secretary, CIB & RC, to present the agenda. After detailed deliberation on each issue, the following decisions were taken: - Agenda Item No. 1: Confirmation of minutes of 51st meeting of CIB held on 04.03.2015 As no comments were received on the minutes, the st minutes of 51 meeting of Central Insecticides Board were confirmed. Agenda Item No. 2: Follow up action on the decisions of 51st meeting of the CIB. The Board noted the follow up actions on the decisions st of 51 meeting with satisfaction and appreciated the efforts made to complete the action in time bound manner. Agenda Item No. 3: Progress report of the Registration Committee, Central Insecticides Laboratory and Regional Pesticides Testing Laboratories. a. Registration Committee: The Board was happy to note the progress of the Sectt. of CIB&RC and burst in to applaud and congratulated the APPA & Secretary, CIB&RC for achieving this mile stone while bringing the pendency at a very manageable level. b. Central Insecticides Laboratory (CIL): The Board noted the progress of the CIL with satisfaction. c. Progress report of Techno-Legal Cell at Headquarter, Faridabad: The progress of Techno-Legal Cell was appreciated by the Board and appreciated the efforts made by the PPA for stringent and quick action in supervising the implementation of the Insecticides Act, 1968. It was also appreciated that remarkable improvement has been made in launching of prosecution under the Insecticides Act, against the defaulters. Agenda Item No. 4: Application for inclusion of substances in the Schedule to the Insecticides Act, 1968. & Agenda Item No. The Board deliberated the agenda in detail and decided to include the molecule in the schedule to the Insecticides Act, 4(a): 1968 as proposed in the agenda with slight correction in the name of applicant i.e. M/s. Camlin Fine Science Ltd., Andheri (E), Mumbai in respect of N-Methyl Phosphonic Chitosan. The complete & approved list is annexed as Annexure – II Agenda Item No. 5: Consolidated revised and corrected list of pesticides Molecule included in the Schedule to the Insecticides Act, 1968 from time to time on the basis of different Notification- reg The Board deliberated the agenda in detail and appreciated the efforts made by the Sectt. of CIB&RC in compiling the Palaeotechnic information in a comprehensive and consolidated form. The Board approved the corrected list as proposed in the agenda of the Molecules already included in to the Schedule to the Insecticides Act, 1968 with IUPAC name, CAS Name & CAS No. which were not earlier appearing in the Schedule, accordingly corrected list along with IUPAC Name, CAS Number and CAS Name may be notified by the Govt. (Annexure-III). It was also observed by the Board that fifteen names in the Schedule are looking like trade name and much information is not available about these molecules in the public domain, therefore, it was decided that a separate public notice may be issued on the website of Sectt. of CIB&RC for seeking information from the stake holders within one month before sending the matter to DAC&FW for notification by the Govt. The names of the products is as under: 1. Metox 2. Zimet 3. Zulate 4. Brozone 5. Chlorofenethol (BCPE) 6. Citicide 7. Coyden 8. Dikar 9. Flucarbimat 10. Boscalid. 11. Campogram M 12. Dikar 13. Menap 14. Sindone A 15. Flucarbimat Agenda Amendment in Chapter IX of the Insecticides Rules, 1971 Item No. 6.0 sub Rule 45 related to notification of places at which insecticides may be imported. The agenda was deliberated in details, in view of communication received from Ministry of Shipping. Board decided that a proposal may be sent to DAC&FW for amendments in the Rule 45 as under: 1. New ports for allowing imports of pesticides at Paradip Port(PPT), Visakhapatanam (VPT), New Mangalore(NMPT) in respect of import of pesticides in to India by Sea may be added. 2. The name of the West Pakistan to Pakistan & East Pakistan to Bangladesh, therefore suitable correction in Rule 45 be incorporated. 3. Name of Madras, Calcutta, and Bombay in respect of insecticides imported by air in to India has been changed to Chennai, Kolkata and Mumbai, respectively, therefore suitable correction in Rule 45 be incorporated. Agenda Consideration of amendments in the rules & forms vide Item No. 7.0 notification No. GSR 840 (E) dated 05.11.2015 by Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare. The agenda was deliberated in detail and approved the same with suggestion of minor corrections in the prescribed qualification for the Pesticides manufacturer and dealer as under: 1. For manufacturer of technical grade pesticides:- Doctorate in Chemistry/Agriculture Chemistry or M.Tech/M.S. in Chemical Engineering. 2. For manufacturer of Pesticide formulation:- Graduate Degree in Agriculture/Science with Chemistry as one of the subject. Additional Agenda Consideration of Amendments in the Insecticides Rules- Item No. 7.(a). 1971 regarding E filing of applications vide Notification GSR No. 654 (E) dated 25th August 2015 by Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare. The agenda was deliberated in details and the Board appreciated the concerted evolutionary efforts made by the APPA & Secretary in achieving the mile stone for implementing complete paperless registration under 9(4) formulation indigenous manufacturing (FIM) for boosting the Pesticides industry while providing the latest technology and modern facilities to support “Make in India” and “Ease of doing Business”. The Amendment was approved by the Board. Agenda Item No. 8 : Assigning of color of identification band (Toxicity Triangle) on label and classification of pesticides as per Toxicity -reg. The agenda was deliberated in details and approved the change of color of toxicity triangle as proposed in the Agenda for 255 formulations and also for 60 other additional pesticides which was approved in the fourth meeting of the Expert Committee. List is annexed as Annexure-IV The Board also noted the need for amendments in the toxicity classification as given in the Insecticides Rules, 1971 and decided that same Expert Committee should deliberate and suggest the amendments required in the classification. Agenda Item No. 9 : Waiting period/pre-harvest interval between application and harvest w.r.t. New Formulations u/s 9(3) and label Expansion of already registered formulations. Noted. Agenda Item No. Reconsideration of Nitrobenzene for inclusion in to the 10 : Schedule to the Insecticides Act, 1968. The members deliberated the agenda in detail and reiterated the decision taken in 51st meeting of Board on the basis of information provided by the Sectt. of CIB&RC. It was further decided that the Govt. may be requested to notified the molecule as early as possible. Agenda Item No.11: Any other item with the permission of Chair It was informed that M/s. EID parry (India) Ltd has applied for grant of approval of enhancement of Shelf life of Neem Extract concentrates containing Azadirechtin 5.0% w/w min and Neem based EC formulation containing Azadirechtin 1.00% min. As per guidelines prior approval of CIB is mandatory for generation of data for S/L enhancement and one of the locations must be CIL. The applicant has stated that inadvertently they have generated the data at three agroclimatic zones without prior permission of Board. Neem is a botanical product and is very stable in nature. They further stated that the S/L of the Neem based product of other manufactures is already two years, therefore ex post facto approval may be granted to process their case for scrutiny. The Board agreed to the request and granted ex-post facto approval for further process of the case. The meeting ended with the vote of thanks to Chair ****** Annexure-I ATTENDENCE SHEET List of the members who attended the 52nd Central Insecticide Board (CIB) meeting held on 12th January, 2016 11.00 AM in DGHS Conference Room No.445 ‘A’ Wing, Resource Centre, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi. S.No. Name & address 1. Dr. Jagdish Prasad, Director, DGHS& Chairman, C.I.B. 2. Dr. P.K.Chakrabarty, ADG, ICAR, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi 3. Dr. S.N. Sushil, PPA, DPPQ&S 4. Dr. Shalini Chawla, Professor, Maulana Azad Medical College 5. Dr. B.S. Phogat, APPA&Secretary, CIB&RC 6. Dr. S Kulshrestha, Consultant(Pharma) 7. Dr. Sarita Bhalla, Sp. Gr.I 8. Dr. D.P. Nagdeve, JD(WS) 9. Dr. Harish Chandra, JD(E) 10. Ms. Kamlesh Miglani, DDI 11. Dr. T.A. Usmani, JD(PP) 12. Dr. Punjab Sing Nain, Dy.Director (PP), CIL, DPPQ&S 13. Dr. Vasudha Goutam, AD(E) 14. Shri Abhisekh, AD I 15. Shri S.K. Dutta, Asstt. Commissioner, D/o Animal Husbandry (Fishries),(AHD) 16. Shri Navneet Pratap Singh, ADC(I), O/o DCG(I) 17. Mrs. Rubina Bose, DD(I), DCG (I) 18. Dr. S. Gupta, Joint Commissioner (I&RI), D/o Food & PD, Krishi Bhawan 19. Dr. L.J. Kantekar, Jt. Director & Head, Centre for Medical Entomology And Vector Management, National Centre for Diseas Control,22, Sham Nath Marg, Delhi-110054, Delhi-110054 20.
Recommended publications
  • Common and Chemical Names of Herbicides Approved by the WSSA

    Common and Chemical Names of Herbicides Approved by the WSSA

    Weed Science 2010 58:511–518 Common and Chemical Names of Herbicides Approved by the Weed Science Society of America Below is the complete list of all common and chemical of herbicides as approved by the International Organization names of herbicides approved by the Weed Science Society of for Standardization (ISO). A sponsor may submit a proposal America (WSSA) and updated as of September 1, 2010. for a common name directly to the WSSA Terminology Beginning in 1996, it has been published yearly in the last Committee. issue of Weed Science with Directions for Contributors to A herbicide common name is not synonymous with Weed Science. This list is published in lieu of the selections a commercial formulation of the same herbicide, and in printed previously on the back cover of Weed Science. Only many instances, is not synonymous with the active ingredient common and chemical names included in this complete of a commercial formulation as identified on the product list should be used in WSSA publications. In the absence of label. If the herbicide is a salt or simple ester of a parent a WSSA-approved common name, the industry code number compound, the WSSA common name applies to the parent as compiled by the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) with compound only. CAS systematic chemical name or the systematic chemical The chemical name used in this list is that preferred by the name alone may be used. The current approved list is also Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) according to their system of available at our web site (www.wssa.net).
  • Literature Review of Controlling Aquatic Invasive Vegetation With

    Literature Review of Controlling Aquatic Invasive Vegetation With

    Eurasian watermilfoil in Christmas Lake, 2011 Literature Review on Controlling Aquatic Invasive Vegetation with Aquatic Herbicides Compared to Other Control Methods: Effectiveness, Impacts, and Costs Prepared for: Prepared by: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Steve McComas Blue Water Science St. Paul, MN 55116 September 2011 1 Literature Review on Controlling Aquatic Invasive Vegetation with Aquatic Herbicides Compared to Other Control Methods: Effectiveness, Impacts, and Costs Steve McComas, Blue Water Science Table of Contents page number Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Use of Herbicides as an Aquatic Plant Control Technique ...................................................................................... 2 How Herbicides Work and Their Mode of Action ....................................................................................................... 3 Aquatic Herbicide Impacts on Humans and the Ecosystem ....................................................................................... 8 Where to Find Sources of Specific Information on herbicide Products and Their Active Ingredients ....................... 16 Harvesting, Drawdown, and Biocontrol as Aquatic Plant Control Techniques ................................................... 17 Summary of Control Techniques for Non-Native Curlyleaf Pondweed and Eurasian Watermilfoil ................... 25 Control Techniques for Other
  • Review of Pesticide Evaluation Report and Safe Use and Action Plan (Persuap) for Usaid Funded Feed the Future Ghana Agricultural

    Review of Pesticide Evaluation Report and Safe Use and Action Plan (Persuap) for Usaid Funded Feed the Future Ghana Agricultural

    REVIEW OF PESTICIDE EVALUATION REPORT AND SAFE USE AND ACTION PLAN (PERSUAP) FOR USAID FUNDED FEED THE FUTURE GHANA AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT AND VALUE CHAIN ENHANCEMENT PROJECT (FTF ADVANCE II) NOVEMBER 2019 PROJECT/ACTIVITY DATA Project/Activity Name: Feed The Future Ghana Agricultural Development and Value Chain Enhancement Activity (FTF ADVANCE II) Amendment (Y/N): Y Geographic Location(s) Ghana, Northern Region, Tamale / West Africa (Country/Region): Implementation Start/End: February 2014 to April 2020 Organizational/Administrative Data Implementing Operating Unit USAID Ghana Feed the Future Program Funding Amount: $39,556,780 Prepared by: Gerald Asare MANTEY, Environmental and Plant Health Specialist with assistance from Daniel Kofi Agyare and Michael Afranie. Date Prepared: August, 2019 ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION RECOMMENDED (Place X where applicable) Categorical Exclusion: N/A Negative Determination: X Positive Determination: N/A Deferral: N/A ADDITIONAL ELEMENTS: (Place X where applicable) CONDITIONS: X PVO/NGO: X EMMP (SUAP): X ERR: Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 7 PART 1: INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Project Background .......................................................................................................... 8 1.2 Objectives ............................................................................................................................
  • China Releases New Maximum Residue Limits for Pesticides In

    China Releases New Maximum Residue Limits for Pesticides In

    GB 2763-2016 THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY Voluntary - Public Date: 3/31/2017 GAIN Report Number: CH17016 China - Peoples Republic of Post: Beijing China Releases New Maximum Residue Limits for Pesticides in Food Report Categories: FAIRS Subject Report Approved By: Lisa Anderson Prepared By: FAS Staff Report Highlights: On December 18, 2016, the Chinese National Health and Family Planning Commission, Ministry of Agriculture, China Food and Drug Administration released the National Food Safety Standard - Maximum Residue Limits for Pesticides in Foods (GB 2763-2016). The standard will replace the current MRL Standard (GB 2763-2014) and will be implemented on June 18, 2017. This report provides an unofficial translation of the standard. Editors’ Note: The asterisk appearing in the MRL column means that the limit is a temporary MRL. A temporary MRL is usually set under the following four conditions: 1. The dietary risk assessment data is incomplete; 2. The Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) is temporary (ADI is used as the basis for MRL setting); 3. There is no surveillance or analysis method for the MRL that complies with the standard requirements; 4. In emergency situations, the pesticide is approved to be used on un-registered crops. I GB 2763-2016 General Information: BEGIN TRANSLATION ICS 65.100 G 25 GB National Standard of the People’s Republic of China GB 2763—2016 Replacing GB 2763 - 2014 National food safety standard Maximum Residue Limits for Pesticides in Food General Information: National Health and Family Planning Commission Issued by: Ministry of Agriculture China Food and Drug Administration Issued on: 2016-12-18 Implementation:2017-06-18 II GB 2763-2016 Table of Content Preface ...............................................................................................................................................................
  • Evaluation of Post Emergence Herbicides on Weed Control, Performance and Profitability of Rice (Oryza Sativa) at Lafiagi, Kwara State of Nigeria

    Evaluation of Post Emergence Herbicides on Weed Control, Performance and Profitability of Rice (Oryza Sativa) at Lafiagi, Kwara State of Nigeria

    Libyan Agriculture Research Center Journal International 3 (5): 236-240, 2012 ISSN 2219-4304 © IDOSI Publications, 2012 DOI: 10.5829/idosi.larcji.2012.3.5.1105 Evaluation of Post Emergence Herbicides on Weed Control, Performance and Profitability of Rice (Oryza sativa) at Lafiagi, Kwara State of Nigeria Ibrahim Usman College of Agriculture, Ahmadu Bello University, Samaru, Zaria, Nigeria Abstract: Field experiments were conducted in 2009 and 2010 wet seasons at Lafiagi, Kwara state in the Northern Guinea Savannah of Nigeria to evaluate the effect of some post emergence herbicides on weed control, performance and profitability of rice. The treatments consisted of four post emergence herbicides (450g pretilachlor + 30g pyribenzoxim, 3600g propanil + 2000g 2, 4-Dichlorophenoxy acetic acid, 40g bisbyribac sodium and 1020g pretilachlor + 1980g propanil), two hoe weeding at 6 and 9 WAS and the unweeded plot. The application rates were based on the manufacturers’ recommendations. The treatments were laid out in a randomized complete block design replicated three times. Data on weed cover score, weed dry matter, crop injury, crop vigour, crop stand and grain yields were collected. Gross margin and cost benefit analysis were employed to determine the profitability of each of the control methods. From the results all the herbicides were similar in their effect on weed control and crop growth. The effect of herbicide treatments on rice yield were comparable to hoe weeding and significantly higher than unweeded treatments. The application of 40g/lha 1 of bisbyribac sodium and application of 450g pretilachlor + 30g pyribenzoxim as post emergence herbicides applied at 6 WAS gave the highest gross margin and Cost- benefit ratio over hand weeding respectively and are therefore considered as the best post emergence herbicides in rice among the evaluated herbicides in the study area.
  • Appendix 3-E

    Appendix 3-E

    Certified Crop Science Consultant Program Appendix 3-E Herbicide, Insecticide, and Fungicide Groups Based on Mode of Action Table 3E-1. Herbicide Groups Based on Mode of Action Group Mode of Action Chemical Family Active Ingredient 1 Inhibitors of acetyl CoA Aryloxyphenoxy propionate clodinafop-propargyl, cyhalofop-butyl, carboxylase (ACCase) ‘FOPs’ diclofop-methyl, fenoxaprop-P-ethyl, fluazifop-P-butyl, haloxyfop-R-methyl, propaquizafop, quizalofop-P-ethyl Cyclohexanedione alloxydim, butroxydim, clethodim, ‘DIMs’ cyclosydim, profoxydim, sethoxydim, tepraloxydim, tralkoxydim 2 Inhibit acetolactate synthase Sulfonylureas amidosulfuron, azimsulfuron, (ALS) also called bensulfuron-methyl, chlorimuron-ethyl, acetohydroxy-acid synthase chlorsulfuron, cinosulfuron, (AHAS) cyclosulfamuron, ethametsulfuron-methyl, ethoxysulfuron, flazasulfuron, flupyrsulfuron-methyl-Na, foramsulfuron, halosulfuron-methyl, imazosulfuron, iodosulfuron, mesosulfuron, metsulfuron- methyl, nicosulfuron, oxasulfuron, primisulfuron-methyl, prosulfuron, pyrazosulfuron-ethyl, rimsulfuron, sulfometuron-methyl, sulfosulfuron, thifensulfuron-methyl, triasulfuron, tribenuron-methyl, trifloxysulfuron, triflusulfuron-methyl, tritosulfuron Imidazoilinone Imazapic, imazamethabenz-methyl, imazamox, imazapyr, imazaquin, imazethapyr Triazolopyrimidines cloransulam-methyl, diclosulam, florasulam, flumetsulam, metosulam, penoxsulam Pyrimidinyl(thio)benzoates bispyribac-Na, pyribenzoxim, pyriftalid, pyrithiobac-Na, pyriminobac-methyl Sulfonylaminocarbonyl- flucarbazone-Na, procarbazone-Na
  • Illegal Pesticide Trade in the Mekong Countries: Case of Lao Pdr

    Illegal Pesticide Trade in the Mekong Countries: Case of Lao Pdr

    ILLEGAL PESTICIDE TRADE IN THE MEKONG COUNTRIES: CASE OF LAO PDR Vientiane Capital and provinces of Louang Namtha and Xiengkhouang By Chela Vázquez Pesticides on the left counter sold with other stuff, Vientiane Capital, Lao PDR Reports on the increasing use of pesticides in Lao PDR (van der Wulp 2006; Lao-FAO IPM and FAO Pesticide Risk Reduction Programme 2009, 2011; FAO IPM Vegetable Regional Programme 2010) have raised the alarm about the use of highly hazardous pesticides (HHPs) by farmers wearing little or no protection. Some of these pesticides, i.e., paraquat and methomyl, have been banned in the country. Lao does not produce active ingredients or pesticide formulations. Nearly all pesticides sold and used in Lao originate from Thailand and China, and to some extent from Vietnam. Lao, as with most non-industrialized countries, lacks the technology to dispose of pesticides safely. Thus, enforcing pesticide regulations, for example by confiscating illegal pesticides, becomes a challenge in the absence of adequate technology to dispose of hazardous products. Regional cooperation among countries is needed, especially from the pesticide manufacturing countries in order to protect communities from toxic chemicals and to enforce national laws. Pesticide manufacturing countries should take measures to both 1) prevent exports of pesticides to countries which have banned them, and 2) accept returned chemicals from countries where they have been confiscated by government authorities. The Strategic Approach on International Chemicals Management (SAICM) offers an adequate framework to advance an international policy mechanism to curtail the illegal flow of pesticides. Furthermore, international donors and development agencies should support government policies that promote sustainable agriculture, free of hazardous chemicals, which reduces the incentive for illegal trade.
  • WO 2016/115709 Al 28 July 2016 (28.07.2016) W P O P C T

    WO 2016/115709 Al 28 July 2016 (28.07.2016) W P O P C T

    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2016/115709 Al 28 July 2016 (28.07.2016) W P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every A01N 43/42 (2006.01) A01N 43/76 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, A01N 47/36 (2006.01) A01N 43/40 (2006.01) AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, A01N 43/54 (2006.01) A01N 43/78 (2006.01) BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, A 39/04 (2006.01) A01P 13/00 (2006.01) DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, (21) International Application Number: KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, PCT/CN20 15/07 1348 MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, (22) International Filing Date: PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, 22 January 2015 (22.01 .2015) SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (25) Filing Language: English (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (26) Publication Language: English kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, (71) Applicant: HICAP FORMULATIONS (HONG KONG) GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, LTD.
  • Farmer to Farmer Programmatic Pesticide Evaluation Report and Safe

    Farmer to Farmer Programmatic Pesticide Evaluation Report and Safe

    RAISE PLUS-Limited scope of work IQC FARMER TO FARMER PROGRAMMATIC PESTICIDE EVALUATION REPORT AND SAFE USE ACTION PLAN (PERSUAP) i Contract No.: AEG-I-18-04-00010-00 Prepared: December 2009 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Weidemann Associates, Inc. DISCLAIMER The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. ii PROGRAMMATIC PESTICIDE EVALUATION REPORT and SAFE USE ACTION PLAN (PERSUAP) Activity Location: Global: activities in over 30 countries including Egypt, Lebanon, Ghana, Mali, Nigeria, Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Georgia, Moldova, Tajikistan, Serbia, Uzbekistan, Angola, Malawi, Mozambique, Dominican Republic, Guyana, Haiti, Nicaragua, South Africa, Belarus, Dominic, Grenada, Mexico, Guatemala, El Salvador, Peru, Colombia, Bolivia, Dominican Republic, Sumatra, Ethiopia, Uganda, St. Kitts and Nevis Activity Title: John Ogonowski Farmer-to-Farmer Volunteer Programs Life of Project: FY 2009-FY 2013 Program Funding: $75 million iii Contents Pesticide Evaluation Report ........................................................................................................................ 1 Summary of Findings ..............................................................................................................................................3 Summary of Recommendations ..............................................................................................................................4
  • WO 2010/147966 Al

    WO 2010/147966 Al

    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date 23 December 2010 (23.12.2010) WO 2010/147966 Al (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every AOlN 43/80 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BR, BW, BY, BZ, (21) International Application Number: CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO, PCT/US2010/038646 DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, (22) International Filing Date: HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, 15 June 2010 (15.06.2010) KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, (25) Filing Language: English NO, NZ, OM, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, RO, RS, RU, SC, SD, (26) Publication Language: English SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (30) Priority Data: 61/187,054 15 June 2009 (15.06.2009) US (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, (71) Applicant (for all designated States except US): ACCU- GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, UG, FORM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC [US/US]; 3225 Dem- ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, MD, RU, TJ, ing Way, Suite 140B, Middleton, Wisconsin 53562 (US).
  • Glossary of Pesticide Chemicals

    Glossary of Pesticide Chemicals

    Glossary of Pesticide Chemicals October 2001 Table of Contents Glossary Index A.................................................4 A...............................................10 B.................................................9 B...............................................12 C...............................................16 C................................................14 D...............................................29 D...............................................18 E...............................................41 E...................................................21 F................................................46 F................................................23 G...............................................58 G................................................24 H...............................................60 H...............................................25 I................................................62 I.................................................26 J................................................68 J................................................26 K...............................................68 K...............................................26 L................................................68 L................................................27 M...............................................69 M...............................................27 N...............................................79 N...............................................30 O................................................82
  • Synergistic Herbicidal Composition Containing Aminopyralid and 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid

    Synergistic Herbicidal Composition Containing Aminopyralid and 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid

    (19) TZZ ¥_T (11) EP 2 528 439 B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION (45) Date of publication and mention (51) Int Cl.: of the grant of the patent: A01N 43/40 (2006.01) A01N 39/04 (2006.01) 25.11.2015 Bulletin 2015/48 A01P 13/00 (2006.01) (21) Application number: 11702118.8 (86) International application number: PCT/US2011/022690 (22) Date of filing: 27.01.2011 (87) International publication number: WO 2011/094388 (04.08.2011 Gazette 2011/31) (54) SYNERGISTIC HERBICIDAL COMPOSITION CONTAINING AMINOPYRALID AND 2,4- DICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID SYNERGISTISCHE HERBIZIDZUSAMMENSETZUNG MIT AMINOPYRALID UND 2,4- DICHLORPHENOXYACETYLSÄURE COMPOSITION HERBICIDE SYNERGIQUE CONTENANT DE L’AMINOPYRALIDE ET DE L’ACIDE 2,4-DICHLOROPHÉNOXYACÉTIQUE (84) Designated Contracting States: (56) References cited: AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB WO-A1-2011/082162 US-A1- 2009 325 803 GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR • KRISTIN K. PAYNE ET AL: "Impact of Herbicides and Application Timing on Weed Control, Yield, (30) Priority: 29.01.2010 US 299517 P and Nutritive Value of Tall Fescue Pastures and Hayfields", WEED TECHNOLOGY, vol. 24, no. 4, (43) Date of publication of application: 1 October 2010 (2010-10-01), pages 515-522, 05.12.2012 Bulletin 2012/49 XP55016239, ISSN: 0890-037X, DOI: 10.1614/WT- D-10-00039.1 (73) Proprietor: Dow AgroSciences, LLC • STEPHEN F. ENLOE ET AL: "Russian Knapweed Indianapolis, IN 46268 (US) (Acroptilon repens) Control with Low Rates of Aminopyralid on Range and Pasture", INVASIVE (72) Inventor: CARRANZA GARZON, Nelson PLANT SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT, vol.