DOCSLIB.ORG

Review of Pesticide Evaluation Report and Safe Use and Action Plan (Persuap) for Usaid Funded Feed the Future Ghana Agricultural

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Review of Pesticide Evaluation Report and Safe Use and Action Plan (Persuap) for Usaid Funded Feed the Future Ghana Agricultural REVIEW OF PESTICIDE EVALUATION REPORT AND SAFE USE AND ACTION PLAN (PERSUAP) FOR USAID FUNDED FEED THE FUTURE GHANA AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT AND VALUE CHAIN ENHANCEMENT PROJECT (FTF ADVANCE II) NOVEMBER 2019 PROJECT/ACTIVITY DATA Project/Activity Name: Feed The Future Ghana Agricultural Development and Value Chain Enhancement Activity (FTF ADVANCE II) Amendment (Y/N): Y Geographic Location(s) Ghana, Northern Region, Tamale / West Africa (Country/Region): Implementation Start/End: February 2014 to April 2020 Organizational/Administrative Data Implementing Operating Unit USAID Ghana Feed the Future Program Funding Amount: $39,556,780 Prepared by: Gerald Asare MANTEY, Environmental and Plant Health Specialist with assistance from Daniel Kofi Agyare and Michael Afranie. Date Prepared: August, 2019 ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION RECOMMENDED (Place X where applicable) Categorical Exclusion: N/A Negative Determination: X Positive Determination: N/A Deferral: N/A ADDITIONAL ELEMENTS: (Place X where applicable) CONDITIONS: X PVO/NGO: X EMMP (SUAP): X ERR: Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 7 PART 1: INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Project Background .......................................................................................................... 8 1.2 Objectives ............................................................................................................................. 8 1.3 Methodology .................................................................................................................... 9 1.4 Summary of Findings & Recommendations ....................................................................... 10 1.4.1 Addressing IPM and crop protection capacity ............................................................. 10 1.4.2 Pesticide Choice ........................................................................................................... 10 1.4.3 Training ........................................................................................................................ 11 1.4.4 Environmental conservation and Climate Smart Agriculture: ..................................... 11 PART 2: PESTICIDE EVALUATION REPORT ........................................................................ 16 2.1 USEPA & GhEPA registration status of the proposed pesticide ........................................ 16 2.2 Basis for selecting the recommended pesticides ............................................................ 77 2.3 Extent to which the proposed pesticide use will be part of an IPM Program ................ 78 2.4 Alternative Pest Management Options for Maize and Soybean. ........................................ 79 2.5 Pest Problems and Control Practices .............................................................................. 84 2.5.1 General Pest Problems and their Management ...................................................... 84 2.5.2 Management of post-harvest pests of cereal crops ..................................................... 92 2.6 Key Pests and Recommended Management Practices ........................................................ 93 2.6.1 Major Natural Enemies and Enhancing Natural Enemy Populations ...................... 93 2.6.2 Management of post-harvest pests of pulses. ......................................................... 94 2.6.3 Pesticide applications –cereals, pulses and vegetables - In line with IPM approaches 95 2.7 Controlling Pesticides use in Crop Protection: .............................................................. 95 2.8 Acute and long-term toxicological hazards associated with the proposed use, and measures available to minimize such hazards .......................................................................... 95 2.9 Proposed methods of application, including availability of appropriate application and safety equipment ....................................................................................................................... 96 2.10 Compatibility of the Proposed Pesticides with target and non-target ecosystems............ 98 2.11 Conditions under which the pesticide is to be used, including climate, flora, fauna, geography, hydrology and soils ................................................................................................ 98 2.12 Availability of other products and non-chemical methods ............................................... 99 2.13 Ghana’s ability to regulate or control the distribution storage, use and disposal of the recommended pesticides ........................................................................................................... 99 2.14 Provisions for training of users and applicators ....................................................... 101 2.15 Monitoring use and effectiveness of pesticides .............................................................. 101 PART 3: SAFER USE ACTION PLAN ..................................................................................... 105 Annex 1: Pests and Diseases of Target Crops and Available and Recommended Control Methods ..................................................................................................................................................... 117 Annex 1A: Fall Armyworm Pest Management Decision Guide (12/2016), by Ghana MOFA PPRSD & CABI Plantwise. .................................................................................................... 117 Annex 1B: African Armyworm Pest Management Decision Guide (March 2016), by Ghana MOFA PPRSD & CABI Plantwise. ....................................................................................... 118 Annex 2: Pesticide Toxicity ........................................................................................................ 119 Annex 3: Approved Active Ingredients Human Toxicity and Ecotoxicology ........................... 121 Annex 4: Training in Pesticide Safer Use ................................................................................... 128 Annex 5: Training in IPM ........................................................................................................... 131 Annex 6: Rejected, Prohibited and Banned Pesticides ............................................................... 144 Annex 7: Fully Registered Pesticides (FRE) and (A3) Herbicides............................................ 146 Annex 7A: (A) Provisionally Cleared Pesticides (PCL) (B3) Herbicides .............................. 172 Annex 8: Pesticide use monitoring sheet for demo plots ............................................................ 186 ACRONYMS ADVANCE Agriculture Development and Value Chain Enhancement AESA Agro-ecosystem Analyses AI Active Ingredient BMP Best Management Practice BT Bacillus thuringiensis (a bacteria that produces a toxin used as a pesticide) CABI Center for Agriculture and Bioscience International CBO Community Based Organisation CRIG Ghana Cocoa Research Institute of Ghana DDT Dichloro-Diphenyl-Trichloroethane EC Emulsifiable Concentrate (pesticide formulation) EMMP Environmental Mitigation & Monitoring Plan EPA Environmental Protection Agency EU European Union FAO Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations FAW Fall Army Worm FTF Feed The Future FRE Fully Registered Pesticides FBO Farmer Based Organisation GAMSAP Ghana Advance Maize Seed Adoption Program GAP Good Agriculture Practice GAIDA Ghana Agric- Input Dealers Association GCAP Ghana Commercial Agriculture Project GhEPA Ghana Environmental Protection Agency GIS Geographic Information Systems GPS Global Positioning Systems GSID Ghana Seed Inspection Division GUP General Use pesticide Ha Hectares HT Highly Toxic IEE Initial Environmental Examination IPM Integrated Pest Management MOFA Ministry of Food and Agriculture (Ghana) MRL Maximum/Minimum Residue Level/Limit MSDS Material Safety Data Sheet NASTAG National Seed Trade Association of Ghana NF Nucleus Farmer NPASP Northern Presbyterian Agricultural Services and Partners NPV Net Present Value PERSUAP Pesticide Evaluation Report and Safe Use Action Plan PFRD Pesticide and Fertility Regulatory Division pH log of Hydrogen concentration, measure of acidity PHI Pre-Harvest Interval PIC Prior Informed Consent (a treaty on toxic pesticides) POPs Persistent Organic Pollutants (a treaty on toxic persistent pesticides) PPE Personal Protection Equipment PPRSD Plant Protection and Regulatory Services Directorate PSB Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria R&D toxin Reproductive and Developmental toxin RUP Restricted Use Pesticide S&C Standards and Certification SSP Spray Service Provider SUAP Safe Use Action Plan UN United Nations UNEP United Nations Environment Programme USAID United States Agency for International Development USEPA US United States Environmental Protection Agency UTM Universal Transverse Mercator WAATP West African Agricultural Transformation Program WHO World Health Organization ZOI Zone of Influence EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This PERSUAP provides a general assessment of the use of pesticides in Ghana as a direct or indirect result of assistance provided through USAID funded Feed The Future Agricultural Development and Value Chain Enhancement Activity (FTF ADVANCE II). The focus of FTF ADVANCE II is to increase the competitiveness of maize, rice and soya value chains in northern Ghana to foster economic growth and reduce poverty, in line
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Common and Chemical Names of Herbicides Approved by the WSSA
    Weed Science 2010 58:511–518 Common and Chemical Names of Herbicides Approved by the Weed Science Society of America Below is the complete list of all common and chemical of herbicides as approved by the International Organization names of herbicides approved by the Weed Science Society of for Standardization (ISO). A sponsor may submit a proposal America (WSSA) and updated as of September 1, 2010. for a common name directly to the WSSA Terminology Beginning in 1996, it has been published yearly in the last Committee. issue of Weed Science with Directions for Contributors to A herbicide common name is not synonymous with Weed Science. This list is published in lieu of the selections a commercial formulation of the same herbicide, and in printed previously on the back cover of Weed Science. Only many instances, is not synonymous with the active ingredient common and chemical names included in this complete of a commercial formulation as identified on the product list should be used in WSSA publications. In the absence of label. If the herbicide is a salt or simple ester of a parent a WSSA-approved common name, the industry code number compound, the WSSA common name applies to the parent as compiled by the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) with compound only. CAS systematic chemical name or the systematic chemical The chemical name used in this list is that preferred by the name alone may be used. The current approved list is also Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) according to their system of available at our web site (www.wssa.net).
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Review of Controlling Aquatic Invasive Vegetation With
    Eurasian watermilfoil in Christmas Lake, 2011 Literature Review on Controlling Aquatic Invasive Vegetation with Aquatic Herbicides Compared to Other Control Methods: Effectiveness, Impacts, and Costs Prepared for: Prepared by: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Steve McComas Blue Water Science St. Paul, MN 55116 September 2011 1 Literature Review on Controlling Aquatic Invasive Vegetation with Aquatic Herbicides Compared to Other Control Methods: Effectiveness, Impacts, and Costs Steve McComas, Blue Water Science Table of Contents page number Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Use of Herbicides as an Aquatic Plant Control Technique ...................................................................................... 2 How Herbicides Work and Their Mode of Action ....................................................................................................... 3 Aquatic Herbicide Impacts on Humans and the Ecosystem ....................................................................................... 8 Where to Find Sources of Specific Information on herbicide Products and Their Active Ingredients ....................... 16 Harvesting, Drawdown, and Biocontrol as Aquatic Plant Control Techniques ................................................... 17 Summary of Control Techniques for Non-Native Curlyleaf Pondweed and Eurasian Watermilfoil ................... 25 Control Techniques for Other
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the 52Nd Meeting of The
    DRAFTS MINUTES OF 52nd MEETING OF THE CENTRAL INSECTICIDES BOARD (CIB) HELD ON 12.01.2016 at RESOURCE CENTRE, ROOM NO. 445, ‘A’ WING, NIRMAN BHAWAN, NEW DELHI. The 52nd Meeting of Central Insecticides Board (CIB) was held on 12.01.2016 at 11.00 AM at Resource Centre, Room No. 445, ‘A’ Wing, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi under the chairmanship of Dr. Jagdish Prasad, Director General of Health Services, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare. Since the quorum was not complete, meeting was adjourned for half an hour and reconvened at 11.30AM, The list of the participants is at Annexure-I. The Chairman welcomed the participants. After formal self-introduction by the participants, the Chairman requested the APPA & Secretary, CIB & RC, to present the agenda. After detailed deliberation on each issue, the following decisions were taken: - Agenda Item No. 1: Confirmation of minutes of 51st meeting of CIB held on 04.03.2015 As no comments were received on the minutes, the st minutes of 51 meeting of Central Insecticides Board were confirmed. Agenda Item No. 2: Follow up action on the decisions of 51st meeting of the CIB. The Board noted the follow up actions on the decisions st of 51 meeting with satisfaction and appreciated the efforts made to complete the action in time bound manner. Agenda Item No. 3: Progress report of the Registration Committee, Central Insecticides Laboratory and Regional Pesticides Testing Laboratories. a. Registration Committee: The Board was happy to note the progress of the Sectt. of CIB&RC and burst in to applaud and congratulated the APPA & Secretary, CIB&RC for achieving this mile stone while bringing the pendency at a very manageable level.
    [Show full text]
  • China Releases New Maximum Residue Limits for Pesticides In
    GB 2763-2016 THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY Voluntary - Public Date: 3/31/2017 GAIN Report Number: CH17016 China - Peoples Republic of Post: Beijing China Releases New Maximum Residue Limits for Pesticides in Food Report Categories: FAIRS Subject Report Approved By: Lisa Anderson Prepared By: FAS Staff Report Highlights: On December 18, 2016, the Chinese National Health and Family Planning Commission, Ministry of Agriculture, China Food and Drug Administration released the National Food Safety Standard - Maximum Residue Limits for Pesticides in Foods (GB 2763-2016). The standard will replace the current MRL Standard (GB 2763-2014) and will be implemented on June 18, 2017. This report provides an unofficial translation of the standard. Editors’ Note: The asterisk appearing in the MRL column means that the limit is a temporary MRL. A temporary MRL is usually set under the following four conditions: 1. The dietary risk assessment data is incomplete; 2. The Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) is temporary (ADI is used as the basis for MRL setting); 3. There is no surveillance or analysis method for the MRL that complies with the standard requirements; 4. In emergency situations, the pesticide is approved to be used on un-registered crops. I GB 2763-2016 General Information: BEGIN TRANSLATION ICS 65.100 G 25 GB National Standard of the People’s Republic of China GB 2763—2016 Replacing GB 2763 - 2014 National food safety standard Maximum Residue Limits for Pesticides in Food General Information: National Health and Family Planning Commission Issued by: Ministry of Agriculture China Food and Drug Administration Issued on: 2016-12-18 Implementation:2017-06-18 II GB 2763-2016 Table of Content Preface ...............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Post Emergence Herbicides on Weed Control, Performance and Profitability of Rice (Oryza Sativa) at Lafiagi, Kwara State of Nigeria
    Libyan Agriculture Research Center Journal International 3 (5): 236-240, 2012 ISSN 2219-4304 © IDOSI Publications, 2012 DOI: 10.5829/idosi.larcji.2012.3.5.1105 Evaluation of Post Emergence Herbicides on Weed Control, Performance and Profitability of Rice (Oryza sativa) at Lafiagi, Kwara State of Nigeria Ibrahim Usman College of Agriculture, Ahmadu Bello University, Samaru, Zaria, Nigeria Abstract: Field experiments were conducted in 2009 and 2010 wet seasons at Lafiagi, Kwara state in the Northern Guinea Savannah of Nigeria to evaluate the effect of some post emergence herbicides on weed control, performance and profitability of rice. The treatments consisted of four post emergence herbicides (450g pretilachlor + 30g pyribenzoxim, 3600g propanil + 2000g 2, 4-Dichlorophenoxy acetic acid, 40g bisbyribac sodium and 1020g pretilachlor + 1980g propanil), two hoe weeding at 6 and 9 WAS and the unweeded plot. The application rates were based on the manufacturers’ recommendations. The treatments were laid out in a randomized complete block design replicated three times. Data on weed cover score, weed dry matter, crop injury, crop vigour, crop stand and grain yields were collected. Gross margin and cost benefit analysis were employed to determine the profitability of each of the control methods. From the results all the herbicides were similar in their effect on weed control and crop growth. The effect of herbicide treatments on rice yield were comparable to hoe weeding and significantly higher than unweeded treatments. The application of 40g/lha 1 of bisbyribac sodium and application of 450g pretilachlor + 30g pyribenzoxim as post emergence herbicides applied at 6 WAS gave the highest gross margin and Cost- benefit ratio over hand weeding respectively and are therefore considered as the best post emergence herbicides in rice among the evaluated herbicides in the study area.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 3-E
    Certified Crop Science Consultant Program Appendix 3-E Herbicide, Insecticide, and Fungicide Groups Based on Mode of Action Table 3E-1. Herbicide Groups Based on Mode of Action Group Mode of Action Chemical Family Active Ingredient 1 Inhibitors of acetyl CoA Aryloxyphenoxy propionate clodinafop-propargyl, cyhalofop-butyl, carboxylase (ACCase) ‘FOPs’ diclofop-methyl, fenoxaprop-P-ethyl, fluazifop-P-butyl, haloxyfop-R-methyl, propaquizafop, quizalofop-P-ethyl Cyclohexanedione alloxydim, butroxydim, clethodim, ‘DIMs’ cyclosydim, profoxydim, sethoxydim, tepraloxydim, tralkoxydim 2 Inhibit acetolactate synthase Sulfonylureas amidosulfuron, azimsulfuron, (ALS) also called bensulfuron-methyl, chlorimuron-ethyl, acetohydroxy-acid synthase chlorsulfuron, cinosulfuron, (AHAS) cyclosulfamuron, ethametsulfuron-methyl, ethoxysulfuron, flazasulfuron, flupyrsulfuron-methyl-Na, foramsulfuron, halosulfuron-methyl, imazosulfuron, iodosulfuron, mesosulfuron, metsulfuron- methyl, nicosulfuron, oxasulfuron, primisulfuron-methyl, prosulfuron, pyrazosulfuron-ethyl, rimsulfuron, sulfometuron-methyl, sulfosulfuron, thifensulfuron-methyl, triasulfuron, tribenuron-methyl, trifloxysulfuron, triflusulfuron-methyl, tritosulfuron Imidazoilinone Imazapic, imazamethabenz-methyl, imazamox, imazapyr, imazaquin, imazethapyr Triazolopyrimidines cloransulam-methyl, diclosulam, florasulam, flumetsulam, metosulam, penoxsulam Pyrimidinyl(thio)benzoates bispyribac-Na, pyribenzoxim, pyriftalid, pyrithiobac-Na, pyriminobac-methyl Sulfonylaminocarbonyl- flucarbazone-Na, procarbazone-Na
    [Show full text]
  • Illegal Pesticide Trade in the Mekong Countries: Case of Lao Pdr
    ILLEGAL PESTICIDE TRADE IN THE MEKONG COUNTRIES: CASE OF LAO PDR Vientiane Capital and provinces of Louang Namtha and Xiengkhouang By Chela Vázquez Pesticides on the left counter sold with other stuff, Vientiane Capital, Lao PDR Reports on the increasing use of pesticides in Lao PDR (van der Wulp 2006; Lao-FAO IPM and FAO Pesticide Risk Reduction Programme 2009, 2011; FAO IPM Vegetable Regional Programme 2010) have raised the alarm about the use of highly hazardous pesticides (HHPs) by farmers wearing little or no protection. Some of these pesticides, i.e., paraquat and methomyl, have been banned in the country. Lao does not produce active ingredients or pesticide formulations. Nearly all pesticides sold and used in Lao originate from Thailand and China, and to some extent from Vietnam. Lao, as with most non-industrialized countries, lacks the technology to dispose of pesticides safely. Thus, enforcing pesticide regulations, for example by confiscating illegal pesticides, becomes a challenge in the absence of adequate technology to dispose of hazardous products. Regional cooperation among countries is needed, especially from the pesticide manufacturing countries in order to protect communities from toxic chemicals and to enforce national laws. Pesticide manufacturing countries should take measures to both 1) prevent exports of pesticides to countries which have banned them, and 2) accept returned chemicals from countries where they have been confiscated by government authorities. The Strategic Approach on International Chemicals Management (SAICM) offers an adequate framework to advance an international policy mechanism to curtail the illegal flow of pesticides. Furthermore, international donors and development agencies should support government policies that promote sustainable agriculture, free of hazardous chemicals, which reduces the incentive for illegal trade.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2016/115709 Al 28 July 2016 (28.07.2016) W P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2016/115709 Al 28 July 2016 (28.07.2016) W P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every A01N 43/42 (2006.01) A01N 43/76 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, A01N 47/36 (2006.01) A01N 43/40 (2006.01) AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, A01N 43/54 (2006.01) A01N 43/78 (2006.01) BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, A 39/04 (2006.01) A01P 13/00 (2006.01) DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, (21) International Application Number: KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, PCT/CN20 15/07 1348 MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, (22) International Filing Date: PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, 22 January 2015 (22.01 .2015) SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (25) Filing Language: English (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (26) Publication Language: English kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, (71) Applicant: HICAP FORMULATIONS (HONG KONG) GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, LTD.
    [Show full text]
  • Farmer to Farmer Programmatic Pesticide Evaluation Report and Safe
    RAISE PLUS-Limited scope of work IQC FARMER TO FARMER PROGRAMMATIC PESTICIDE EVALUATION REPORT AND SAFE USE ACTION PLAN (PERSUAP) i Contract No.: AEG-I-18-04-00010-00 Prepared: December 2009 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Weidemann Associates, Inc. DISCLAIMER The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. ii PROGRAMMATIC PESTICIDE EVALUATION REPORT and SAFE USE ACTION PLAN (PERSUAP) Activity Location: Global: activities in over 30 countries including Egypt, Lebanon, Ghana, Mali, Nigeria, Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Georgia, Moldova, Tajikistan, Serbia, Uzbekistan, Angola, Malawi, Mozambique, Dominican Republic, Guyana, Haiti, Nicaragua, South Africa, Belarus, Dominic, Grenada, Mexico, Guatemala, El Salvador, Peru, Colombia, Bolivia, Dominican Republic, Sumatra, Ethiopia, Uganda, St. Kitts and Nevis Activity Title: John Ogonowski Farmer-to-Farmer Volunteer Programs Life of Project: FY 2009-FY 2013 Program Funding: $75 million iii Contents Pesticide Evaluation Report ........................................................................................................................ 1 Summary of Findings ..............................................................................................................................................3 Summary of Recommendations ..............................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2010/147966 Al
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date 23 December 2010 (23.12.2010) WO 2010/147966 Al (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every AOlN 43/80 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BR, BW, BY, BZ, (21) International Application Number: CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO, PCT/US2010/038646 DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, (22) International Filing Date: HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, 15 June 2010 (15.06.2010) KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, (25) Filing Language: English NO, NZ, OM, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, RO, RS, RU, SC, SD, (26) Publication Language: English SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (30) Priority Data: 61/187,054 15 June 2009 (15.06.2009) US (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, (71) Applicant (for all designated States except US): ACCU- GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, UG, FORM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC [US/US]; 3225 Dem- ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, MD, RU, TJ, ing Way, Suite 140B, Middleton, Wisconsin 53562 (US).
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Pesticide Chemicals
    Glossary of Pesticide Chemicals October 2001 Table of Contents Glossary Index A.................................................4 A...............................................10 B.................................................9 B...............................................12 C...............................................16 C................................................14 D...............................................29 D...............................................18 E...............................................41 E...................................................21 F................................................46 F................................................23 G...............................................58 G................................................24 H...............................................60 H...............................................25 I................................................62 I.................................................26 J................................................68 J................................................26 K...............................................68 K...............................................26 L................................................68 L................................................27 M...............................................69 M...............................................27 N...............................................79 N...............................................30 O................................................82
    [Show full text]
  • Synergistic Herbicidal Composition Containing Aminopyralid and 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid
    (19) TZZ ¥_T (11) EP 2 528 439 B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION (45) Date of publication and mention (51) Int Cl.: of the grant of the patent: A01N 43/40 (2006.01) A01N 39/04 (2006.01) 25.11.2015 Bulletin 2015/48 A01P 13/00 (2006.01) (21) Application number: 11702118.8 (86) International application number: PCT/US2011/022690 (22) Date of filing: 27.01.2011 (87) International publication number: WO 2011/094388 (04.08.2011 Gazette 2011/31) (54) SYNERGISTIC HERBICIDAL COMPOSITION CONTAINING AMINOPYRALID AND 2,4- DICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID SYNERGISTISCHE HERBIZIDZUSAMMENSETZUNG MIT AMINOPYRALID UND 2,4- DICHLORPHENOXYACETYLSÄURE COMPOSITION HERBICIDE SYNERGIQUE CONTENANT DE L’AMINOPYRALIDE ET DE L’ACIDE 2,4-DICHLOROPHÉNOXYACÉTIQUE (84) Designated Contracting States: (56) References cited: AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB WO-A1-2011/082162 US-A1- 2009 325 803 GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR • KRISTIN K. PAYNE ET AL: "Impact of Herbicides and Application Timing on Weed Control, Yield, (30) Priority: 29.01.2010 US 299517 P and Nutritive Value of Tall Fescue Pastures and Hayfields", WEED TECHNOLOGY, vol. 24, no. 4, (43) Date of publication of application: 1 October 2010 (2010-10-01), pages 515-522, 05.12.2012 Bulletin 2012/49 XP55016239, ISSN: 0890-037X, DOI: 10.1614/WT- D-10-00039.1 (73) Proprietor: Dow AgroSciences, LLC • STEPHEN F. ENLOE ET AL: "Russian Knapweed Indianapolis, IN 46268 (US) (Acroptilon repens) Control with Low Rates of Aminopyralid on Range and Pasture", INVASIVE (72) Inventor: CARRANZA GARZON, Nelson PLANT SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT, vol.
    [Show full text]