Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Doktora

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Doktora ÇUKUROVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ DOKTORA TEZİ Yasemin ŞEKERDEN ÇAĞLAR HATAY İLİ BAĞ ALANLARINDAKİ ZARARLILAR, YAYILIŞLARI, PARAZİTOİT VE PREDATÖRLER İLE BAĞ SALKIM GÜVESİ, Lobesia botrana (DENIS & SCHIFFERMULLER) (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE)’NIN POPÜLASYON GELİŞMESİNİN BELİRLENMESİ BİTKİ KORUMA ANABİLİM DALI ADANA, 2009 ÇUKUROVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ HATAY İLİ BAĞ ALANLARINDAKİ ZARARLILAR, YAYILIŞLARI, PARAZİTOİT VE PREDATÖRLER İLE BAĞ SALKIM GÜVESİ, Lobesia botrana (DENIS & SCHIFFERMULLER)(LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE)’NIN POPÜLASYON GELİŞMESİNİN BELİRLENMESİ Yasemin ŞEKERDEN ÇAĞLAR DOKTORA TEZİ BİTKİ KORUMA ANABİLİM DALI Bu tez 25/12/2009 Tarihinde Aşağıdaki Jüri Üyeleri Tarafından Oybirliği/Oyçokluğu İle Kabul Edilmiştir. İmza…………………….. İmza…………………….. İmza…………………..….. Prof. Dr. Nedim UYGUN Prof. Dr. İsmail KARACA Prof. Dr. M. Rifat ULUSOY Danışman Üye Üye İmza………………….. İmza………………………..….. Doç. Dr. Serdar SATAR Yrd. Doç. Dr. M. Murat ASLAN Üye Üye Bu tez Enstitümüz Bitki Koruma Anabilim Dalında hazırlanmıştır. Kod No Prof. Dr. İlhami YEĞİNGİL Enstitü Müdürü İmza ve Mühür Bu Çalışma Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Birimi Tarafından Desteklenmiştir. Proje No:ZF2005D6 • Not: Bu tezde kullanılan özgün ve başka kaynaktan yapılan bildirişlerin, çizelge, şekil ve fotoğrafların kaynak gösterilmeden kullanımı, 5846 sayılı Fikir ve Sanat Eserleri Kanunundaki hükümlere tabidir. ÖZ DOKTORA HATAY İLİ BAĞ ALANLARINDAKİ ZARARLILAR, YAYILIŞLARI PARAZİTOİT VE PREDATÖRLER İLE BAĞ SALKIM GÜVESİ, Lobesia botrana (Denis & Schiffermüller) (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE)’NIN POPÜLASYON GELİŞMESİNİN BELİRLENMESİ Yasemin ŞEKERDEN ÇAĞLAR ÇUKUROVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ BİTKİ KORUMA ANA BİLİM DALI Danışman : Prof. Dr. Nedim UYGUN Yıl : 2009, Sayfa :126 Jüri: Prof. Dr. Nedim UYGUN Prof. Dr. İsmail KARACA Prof. Dr. M. Rifat ULUSOY Doç. Dr. Serdar SATAR Yrd. Doç. Dr. M. Murat ASLAN Bu çalışma 2005-2009 yılları arasındaki periyotta, Hatay ili bağ alanlarındaki zararlılar, yayılışları, parazitoit ve predatörler ile Bağ Salkım Güvesi, Lobesia botrana Denis & Schiff.’nın popülasyon gelişmesinin belirlenmesi amacıyla yapılmıştır. Toplam olarak 14 zararlı tür tespit edilmiştir. Bunların yedisi Hemiptera, beşi Lepidoptera, birer tür de Coleoptera ve Acarina takımına aittir. Hemiptera takımından olup, asma phytoplasma hastalıklarının vektörü olan dört tür, Türkiye’deki bağ alanlarında ilk defa görülmüştür. Ayrıca toplam 10 yararlı tür belirlenmiştir. Bunların altısı Coleoptera, biri Neuroptera ve üçü Hymenoptera takımından türlerdir. Hatay ili bağ alanlarında L. botrana’nın yılda üç döl verdiği (nisan, haziran ve temmuz) belirlenmiştir. Kışlayan pupalardan ergin çıkışlarının mart ayında başladığı ve zararlının vejetasyon dönemi boyunca bağ alanlarında bulunduğu tespit edilmiştir. Zararlının popülasyon yoğunluğunun asmanın çiçeklenme, koruk ve tanelerin olgunlaşma döneminde yükseldiği belirlenmiştir. Popülasyon yoğunluğunun çeşitlere göre farklılık gösterdiği ve daha ziyade erken olgunlaşan çeşitler tercih edilmekle beraber, salkımların tane sıklığı gibi morfolojik karakterlerin de bu hususta rol oynadığı, ayrıca zararlının saklanabilmesi için uygun bir ortam yaratması nedeniyle, iç kısımları havadar olmayan çeşitlerin tercih edildiği saptanmıştır. Bu özellikler bakımından zararlının birinci sırada Yalova incisi, ikinci sırada ise Pafi çeşidini tercih ettiği zarar düzeyinin ise, çeşitlere göre farklılık gösterdiği ancak bütün çeşitlerde tanelerin olgunlaşma döneminde arttığı tespit edilmiştir. Anahtar kelimeler: Bağ,Lobesia botrana, popülasyon yoğunluğu, parazitoit, predatör I ABSTRACT PhD THESIS DETERMINATION OF THE PESTS, PARASITOIDS AND PREDATORS WITH POPULATION GROWTH OF THE GRAPE MOTH, Lobesia botrana (Denis & Schiffermüller) (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE) IN THE VINEYARDS OF HATAY PROVINCE Yasemin ŞEKERDEN ÇAĞLAR DEPARTMENT OF PLANT PROTECTION INSTITUTE OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF CUKUROVA Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Nedim UYGUN Year : 2009, Pages:126 Jury: Prof. Dr. Nedim UYGUN Prof. Dr. İsmail KARACA Prof. Dr. M. Rifat ULUSOY Assoc. Prof. Dr. Serdar SATAR Assist. Prof. Dr. M. Murat ASLAN This study carried out in order to determination of pests, parasitoids and predators and population growth of Lobesia botrana Denis&Schiff. in the vinyards of Hatay Province in 2005-2009 years period. As a total of 14 harmful species determined. seven of them were belong to Hemiptera, five of them Lepidoptera, one of them Coleoptera and Acarina orders. Four species of Hemiptera order, that they were vectors of the grape phtoplasma diseases, were first time seen in vineyards of Turkey. In addition, as a totol of 10 beneficial species determined. Two of them Braconidae and one of them Ichneumonidae families and six of them Coleoptera, and one of them Neuroptera orders. It is determined that L. botrana gives offspring three times (april, june and july) in a year in Hatay Province vineyard. Also the going-out of adults from the wintering pupaes starts in march. It has been determined that the pest is located in the vineyards throughout the vegetation time. It has been concluded that the population density of pest high the grapevine in blossom, unripe and maturation time of berries. It has been determined that the population density of the pests changes according to the varieties and it especially prefers the early maturing varieties. It has been concluded the morphologic characters such as the frequency of clusters grains have roles, as well. Besides, the varieties the innersides of which aren't airy have been chosen because of to create an environment suitable for individuals can be stored. It has been determined that pest prefers primarily Yalova incisi and the second Pafi of grape varieties. Furthermore, the value of damage changes variety to variety but in all varieties the harm increases in the maturation time of berries. Keywords: Vineyard, Lobesia botrana, population density, parasitoid, predator II TEŞEKKÜR Tez çalışmamın her aşamasında emeği geçen, bilimsel katkılarıyla tezimi zenginleştiren ve her zaman öğrencisi olmaktan onur duyduğum, Danışman hocam sayın Prof. Dr. Nedim UYGUN’a sonsuz teşekkürü bir borç bilirim. Bilimsel katkılarından dolayı, sayın Prof. Dr. İsmail KARACA’ya, sayın Prof. Dr. M. Rifat ULUSOY’a, sayın Doç. Dr. Serdar SATAR’a ve çalışmam süresince yardımlarını esirgemeyen sayın Yrd. Doç. Dr. M. Murat ASLAN’a çok teşekkür ederim. Tür teşhislerinin yapılmasında değerli katkılarından dolayı başta, Danışman hocam sayın Prof. Dr. Nedim UYGUN olmak üzere, sayın Prof. Dr. İrfan ARSLAN’a, sayın Prof. Dr. Rüstem HAYAT’a, sayın Prof. Dr. Ünal ZEYBEKOĞLU’na, sayın Prof. Dr. Sebahat SULLIVAN’a, sayın Prof. Dr. Ahmet BEYARSLAN’a, sayın Doç. Dr. Osman SERT’e, sayın Doç. Dr. Kenan KARA’ya, sayın Yrd. Doç. Dr. Coşkun GÜÇLÜ’ye, sayın Yrd. Doç. Dr. Erol ATAY’a, sayın Dr. Saliha ÇORUH’a, sayın Dr. Işıl ÖZDEMİR’e, sayın Dr. Mustafa ÖZDEMİR’e ve sayın Dr. Murat YURTCAN’a en içten dileklerimle ve ayrı ayrı teşekkür ederim. Tez çalışmamın gerçekleştirilmesinde maddi destek sağlayan Çukurova Üniversitesi, Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Birimi’ne teşekkür ederim. Çalışmam süresince gerekli olan meteorolojik verileri temin etmemde gösterdikleri yardım ve alakadan dolayı, Hatay Meteoroloji Müdürlüğü’ndeki tüm idari ve teknik personele teşekkür ederim. Çalışmam süresince her türlü desteği veren, babam Zir. Yük. Müh. Gani ŞEKERDEN ve annem Prof. Dr. Özel ŞEKERDEN’e, moralimi hep yüksek tutmamı sağlayan ve yardımlarından dolayı, kardeşim Dr. Filiz ŞEKERDEN’e, sonsuz teşekkürler. Tez çalışmamın başından sonuna kadar daima yanımda ve yardımcı olan, desteğini bir an olsun esirgemeyen eşim, Orhan ÇAĞLAR’a ve varlıklarıyla bana güç veren çocuklarım, Gani Umut ve Onur Hüseyin’e çalışmam süresince gösterdikleri sabır ve özveriden dolayı sonsuz teşekkürler. III İÇİNDEKİLER SAYFA ÖZ...................................................................................................................... I ABSTRACT…………………………………….............................................. II TEŞEKKÜR………………………………………………………….…….... III İÇİNDEKİLER………………………………………………………....…… IV ÇİZELGELER DİZİNİ……………………………………………………... VII ŞEKİLLER DİZİNİ………………………………………………………..... X KISALTMALAR DİZİNİ……………………………………………....…... XV 1.GİRİŞ…………………………………………………………….........…… 1 2.ÖNCEKİ ÇALIŞMALAR……………………………………….……...… 3 3. MATERYAL VE METOD………………………………………..........… 22 3.1. Faunistik Çalışmalar……………………………....…..................…..… 22 3.1.1. Bağlarda Zararlı Olan Türlerin Belirlenmesi……………………..... 23 3.1.1.1. Doğrudan Gözle Kontrol………………...................………....... 23 3.1.1.2. Darbe Yöntemiyle Örnekleme………………………………..... 23 3.1.1.3. Atrap ile Örnekleme………………………………………......... 23 3.1.1.4. Sarı Yapışkan Tuzaklar ile Örnekleme……………………….... 24 3.1.2. Parazitoit ve Predatörlerin Belirlenmesi………………………........ 24 3.2. Lobesia botrana’nın Farklı Bölgeler ve Farklı Üzüm Çeşitlerindeki Ergin Popülasyon Gelişmesinin Belirlenmesi……………………....... 26 3.2.1. Hassa İlçesi’nde Çalışmanın Yürütüldüğü Bağların ve Bu Bağlarda Yetiştirilen Üzüm Çeşitlerinin Özellikleri…………………….....… 27 3.2.1.1. Yalova incisi Çeşidinin Yetiştirildiği Bağ ve Çeşit Özelliği…... 27 3.2.1.2. Hatunparmağı Çeşidinin Yetiştirildiği Bağ ve Çeşit Özelliği...... 28 3.2.1.3. Pafı Çeşidinin Yetiştirildiği Bağ ve Çeşit Özelliği……….......... 28 3.2.2. Altınözü İlçesi’nde Çalışmanın Yürütüldüğü Bağın ve Bu Bağda Yetiştirilen Üzüm Çeşitlerinin Özellikleri………………..........….. 29 3.2.2.1. İzmir Çekirdeksiz……………………………………................. 29 3.2.2.2. Antep
Recommended publications
  • The Leafhoppers of Minnesota
    Technical Bulletin 155 June 1942 The Leafhoppers of Minnesota Homoptera: Cicadellidae JOHN T. MEDLER Division of Entomology and Economic Zoology University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station The Leafhoppers of Minnesota Homoptera: Cicadellidae JOHN T. MEDLER Division of Entomology and Economic Zoology University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Accepted for publication June 19, 1942 CONTENTS Page Introduction 3 Acknowledgments 3 Sources of material 4 Systematic treatment 4 Eurymelinae 6 Macropsinae 12 Agalliinae 22 Bythoscopinae 25 Penthimiinae 26 Gyponinae 26 Ledrinae 31 Amblycephalinae 31 Evacanthinae 37 Aphrodinae 38 Dorydiinae 40 Jassinae 43 Athysaninae 43 Balcluthinae 120 Cicadellinae 122 Literature cited 163 Plates 171 Index of plant names 190 Index of leafhopper names 190 2M-6-42 The Leafhoppers of Minnesota John T. Medler INTRODUCTION HIS bulletin attempts to present as accurate and complete a T guide to the leafhoppers of Minnesota as possible within the limits of the material available for study. It is realized that cer- tain groups could not be treated completely because of the lack of available material. Nevertheless, it is hoped that in its present form this treatise will serve as a convenient and useful manual for the systematic and economic worker concerned with the forms of the upper Mississippi Valley. In all cases a reference to the original description of the species and genus is given. Keys are included for the separation of species, genera, and supergeneric groups. In addition to the keys a brief diagnostic description of the important characters of each species is given. Extended descriptions or long lists of references have been omitted since citations to this literature are available from other sources if ac- tually needed (Van Duzee, 1917).
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf 271.95 K
    Iranian Journal of Animal Biosystematics (IJAB) Vol.11, No.2, 121-148, 2015 ISSN: 1735-434X (print); 2423-4222 (online) A checklist of Iranian Deltocephalinae (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) Pakarpour Rayeni, F.a*, Nozari, J.b, Seraj, A.A.a a Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran b Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture & Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran (Received: 7 February 2015; Accepted: 29 June 2015) By using published records and original data from recent research, the first checklist for subfamily Deltocephalinae from Iran is presented. This study is based on a comprehensive review of literatures and the examination of some materials from our collection. The present checklist contains 184 species belonging to 74 genera. In addition, for each species, the known geographical distribution in Iran and in the world is reported. Key words: leafhoppers, records, subfamily, distribution, Iran. INTRODUCTION Zahniser and Dietrich (2013) stated that currently Deltocephalinae contains 6683 valid species and 923 genera, making it the largest subfamily of Cicadellidae based on the number of described species. The subfamily is distributed worldwide, and it contains the majority of leafhoppers vectoring economically important plant diseases, some of which cause significant damage and economic loss”. Many species feed on herbaceous or woody dicotyledonous plants, while about 1/3 of the tribes specialize on grass and sedge hosts and are particularly diverse and abundant in grassland ecosystems (Dietrich, 2005). The history of the faunestic studies on leafhoppers in Iran is mainly based on Dlabola's investigations (1957; 1958; 1960; 1961; 1964; 1971; 1974; 1977; 1979; 1981; 1984; 1987; 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • The Leafhoppers, Or Cicadellidae, of Illinois (Eurymelinae-Balcluthinae)
    BULLETIN of the ILLINOIS NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY HARLOW B. MILLS, Chief The Leafhoppers, or Cicadellidae, of Illinois (Eurymelinae-Balcluthinae) D. M. DELONG PriDted by Authority of the STATE OF ILLINOIS DWIGHT H. GREEN, Govtrnor DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION FRANK G. THOMPSON, Dirtctor STATE t) F I 1. I, I N O I S DwiGiiT H. CiREES', Governor PEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION ANi:) EDUCATION Frank G. Thompson, Director \^ ^- \' N A T U R A L HISTORY S U R E I ) I 1 S I O N Hari.o\\ B. Mii.i.s, (-liicf \ olumc 24 BULI^K TIN Article 2 The Leafhoppers, or Cicadellidae, of Illinois (Eurymelinae— Balcluthinae) ]). M. 1)1 f,c)Nc; Priulid hy Jul/iority of the Stall- of Illinois URBANA, ILLINOIS June 194S STATE OF ILLINOIS DwiGHT H. Green, Governor DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION Frank G. Thompson, Director BOARD OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION Frank G. Thompson, Chairman A. E. Emerson, Ph.D., Rio/oxv George D. Stoddard, Ph.D., Litt.D., L.H.D., L. H Tiffany, Ph.D., Forestry LL.D., President of the Ihiivcrsily nj Illinois l' R. Howson, B.S.C.E., C.E., Walter H. Newhoi'isk, Ph.D., Geology Engineering Roger Adams, Ph.D., D.Sc, Chemistry NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY DIVISION Urbana, Illinois Scientific and Technical Staff H.^Ri.ow B. Mills, Ph.D., Chief Bessie B. Henderson, M.S., Assistant to the Chief Section of Economic Entomology Section of Forestry Entomologist George C. Decker, Ph.D., WiLLET N. Wandell, M.F., Forester and and Head Head M.S., Entomologist J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Leafhopper Vectors of Phytopathogenic Viruses (Homoptera, Cicadellidae) Taxonomy, Biology, and Virus Transmission
    /«' THE LEAFHOPPER VECTORS OF PHYTOPATHOGENIC VIRUSES (HOMOPTERA, CICADELLIDAE) TAXONOMY, BIOLOGY, AND VIRUS TRANSMISSION Technical Bulletin No. 1382 Agricultural Research Service UMTED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many individuals gave valuable assistance in the preparation of this work, for which I am deeply grateful. I am especially indebted to Miss Julianne Rolfe for dissecting and preparing numerous specimens for study and for recording data from the literature on the subject matter. Sincere appreciation is expressed to James P. Kramer, U.S. National Museum, Washington, D.C., for providing the bulk of material for study, for allowing access to type speci- mens, and for many helpful suggestions. I am also grateful to William J. Knight, British Museum (Natural History), London, for loan of valuable specimens, for comparing type material, and for giving much useful information regarding the taxonomy of many important species. I am also grateful to the following persons who allowed me to examine and study type specimens: René Beique, Laval Univer- sity, Ste. Foy, Quebec; George W. Byers, University of Kansas, Lawrence; Dwight M. DeLong and Paul H. Freytag, Ohio State University, Columbus; Jean L. LaiFoon, Iowa State University, Ames; and S. L. Tuxen, Universitetets Zoologiske Museum, Co- penhagen, Denmark. To the following individuals who provided additional valuable material for study, I give my sincere thanks: E. W. Anthon, Tree Fruit Experiment Station, Wenatchee, Wash.; L. M. Black, Uni- versity of Illinois, Urbana; W. E. China, British Museum (Natu- ral History), London; L. N. Chiykowski, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa ; G. H. L. Dicker, East Mailing Research Sta- tion, Kent, England; J.
    [Show full text]
  • Auchenorrhyncha Monitoring and Proposal of Management Measures for Potential Pests on Peach Orchards in Beira Interior Region
    UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA FACULDADE DE CIÊNCIAS DEPARTAMENTO DE BIOLOGIA ANIMAL Auchenorrhyncha monitoring and proposal of management measures for potential pests on peach orchards in Beira Interior region Patrícia Monteiro Nascimento Mestrado em Biologia Humana e Ambiente Dissertação orientada por: Prof. Doutora Maria Teresa Rebelo (FCUL) 2020 Agradecimentos/ Acknowledgments ▪ à Professora Teresa Rebelo pela orientação, constante disponibilidade e boa disposição, por esclarecer as minhas dúvidas e por todas as sugestões, conselhos e revisões da tese; ▪ à Mestre Carina Neto por toda a ajuda na identificação dos insectos, pelos conselhos dados e por esclarecer as minhas dúvidas; ▪ a Joaquim Martins Duarte & Filhos, Lda por ter permitido a colocação das placas nos seus pomares para a amostragem e construção do presente trabalho; ▪ à Engenheira Anabela Barateiro pela recolha e envio de amostras, disponibilização de informação dos pomares e dados meteorológicos da região; ▪ ao Professor José Pereira Coutinho pelo envio de amostras e disponibilização de fotografias dos pomares e informação; ▪ à Unidade de Microscopia da FCUL que faz parte da Plataforma Portuguesa de Bioimaging (PPBI-POCI-01-0145-FEDER-022122) por ter disponibilizado o equipamento necessário para a aquisição de imagens dos insectos; ▪ à minha mãe, por toda a paciência, carinho, compreensão e apoio incondicional; ▪ às minhas amigas Inês Alves, Margarida Castelão e Catarina Ramos pela partilha da fase académica, pela companhia e pelas visitas, e à minha amiga Joana Cotrim por todo o apoio, paciência e companhia ao longo desta etapa. i Abstract The Auchenorrhyncha suborder comprises several species considered to be pests of economically important crops whether as a result of the direct damage caused by their feeding process or through some species ability to act as vectors for plant pathogens such as viruses and phytoplasmas.
    [Show full text]
  • Hemiptera, Auchenorrhyncha: Cicadellidae
    ZOOSYSTEMATICA ROSSICA ISSN 2410-0226 Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, St Petersburg ▪ https://www.zin.ru/journals/zsr/ [ onl ine] 0320-9180 Vol. 28(1): 155–162 ▪ Published online 13 June 2019 ▪ DOI 10.31610/zsr/2019.28.1.155 [ print] RESEARCH ARTICLE Leafhoppers of the subtribe Paradorydiina Evans (Hemiptera, Auchenorrhyncha: Cicadellidae) in the United Arab Emirates Цикадки подтрибы Paradorydiina Evans (Hemiptera, Auchenorrhyncha: Cicadellidae) в Объединенных Арабских Эмиратах V.M. Gnezdilov В.М. Гнездилов Vladimir M. Gnezdilov, Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, 1 Universitetskaya Emb., St Petersburg 199034, Russia. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract. Chloropelix canariensis Lindberg, 1936, Paradorydium desertorum Linnavuori, 1964, and P. spatulatum (Naudé, 1926) are recorded from the United Arab Emirates for the first time. These species were collected from Poaceae and Compositae in northeastern part of the country. Paradorydium deserto- rum is also recorded for the first time from Israel, and P. spatulatum, from Morocco. Two new synonyms are established: Bumizana deccani Viraktamath et Viraktamath, 1989, syn. nov. = P. spatulatum; Chloro- pelix indica Viraktamath et Viraktamath, 1989, syn. nov. = Ch. canariensis. Резюме. Chloropelix canariensis Lindberg, 1936, Paradorydium desertorum Linnavuori, 1964 и P. spa- tulatum (Naudé, 1926) впервые указаны из Объединенных Арабских Эмиратов. Эти виды собра- ны со злаков (Poaceae) и сложноцветных (Compositae) на северо-востоке страны. Paradorydium
    [Show full text]
  • The Crab Spider–Pitcher Plant Relationship Is a Nutritional Mutualism That Is Dependent on Prey- Resource Quality
    Received: 5 July 2018 | Accepted: 28 September 2018 DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12915 RESEARCH ARTICLE The crab spider–pitcher plant relationship is a nutritional mutualism that is dependent on prey- resource quality Weng Ngai Lam | Hugh T. W. Tan Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Abstract Singapore 1. Nutritional mutualisms are one of the three major categories of mutualisms and Correspondence involve the provision of limiting nutrients (resources) to one species by another. It Weng Ngai Lam was recently shown in laboratory experiments that two species of pitcher-dwell- Email: [email protected] ing crab spiders (Thomisidae), Thomisus nepenthiphilus and Misumenops nepen- Handling Editor: Audrey Dussutour thicola, increased capture rates of flesh flies (Sarcophagidae) for their host, Nepenthes gracilis. The spiders ambushed pitcher-visiting flesh flies and dropped their carcasses into pitchers after consuming them. The consumption of shared prey-resources by crab spiders and pitcher plants presents the possibility of para- sitism between them. However, ecologically generalizable mechanisms that pre- dict the context-dependent outcomes of such mutualisms are not known. 2. The effectiveness framework (mutualism effectiveness = quality × quantity) is useful for examining the total effect of mutualisms, but its quality component can be difficult to define. We identify the crab spider–pitcher plant interaction as a type of resource conversion mutualism and propose that the quality component in such interactions is the amount of the underlying resource contained in each unit of resource processed. We then used the crab spider–pitcher plant interaction to test the hypothesis that resource conversion mutualisms are more beneficial to the nutrient recipient when operating through high-quality resources (i.e., large prey, in this interaction).
    [Show full text]
  • Beiträge Zur Bayerischen Entomofaunistik 13: 67–207
    Beiträge zur bayerischen Entomofaunistik 13:67–207, Bamberg (2014), ISSN 1430-015X Grundlegende Untersuchungen zur vielfältigen Insektenfauna im Tiergarten Nürnberg unter besonderer Betonung der Hymenoptera Auswertung von Malaisefallenfängen in den Jahren 1989 und 1990 von Klaus von der Dunk & Manfred Kraus Inhaltsverzeichnis 1. Einleitung 68 2. Untersuchungsgebiet 68 3. Methodik 69 3.1. Planung 69 3.2. Malaisefallen (MF) im Tiergarten 1989, mit Gelbschalen (GS) und Handfänge 69 3.3. Beschreibung der Fallenstandorte 70 3.4. Malaisefallen, Gelbschalen und Handfänge 1990 71 4. Darstellung der Untersuchungsergebnisse 71 4.1. Die Tabellen 71 4.2. Umfang der Untersuchungen 73 4.3. Grenzen der Interpretation von Fallenfängen 73 5. Untersuchungsergebnisse 74 5.1. Hymenoptera 74 5.1.1. Hymenoptera – Symphyta (Blattwespen) 74 5.1.1.1. Tabelle Symphyta 74 5.1.1.2. Tabellen Leerungstermine der Malaisefallen und Gelbschalen und Blattwespenanzahl 78 5.1.1.3. Symphyta 79 5.1.2. Hymenoptera – Terebrantia 87 5.1.2.1. Tabelle Terebrantia 87 5.1.2.2. Tabelle Ichneumonidae (det. R. Bauer) mit Ergänzungen 91 5.1.2.3. Terebrantia: Evanoidea bis Chalcididae – Ichneumonidae – Braconidae 100 5.1.2.4. Bauer, R.: Ichneumoniden aus den Fängen in Malaisefallen von Dr. M. Kraus im Tiergarten Nürnberg in den Jahren 1989 und 1990 111 5.1.3. Hymenoptera – Apocrita – Aculeata 117 5.1.3.1. Tabellen: Apidae, Formicidae, Chrysididae, Pompilidae, Vespidae, Sphecidae, Mutillidae, Sapygidae, Tiphiidae 117 5.1.3.2. Apidae, Formicidae, Chrysididae, Pompilidae, Vespidae, Sphecidae, Mutillidae, Sapygidae, Tiphiidae 122 5.1.4. Coleoptera 131 5.1.4.1. Tabelle Coleoptera 131 5.1.4.2.
    [Show full text]
  • FACULTY of SCIENCES INSTITUTE of BIOLOGY UNIVERSITY of NEUCHÂTEL PHD THESIS Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Managemen
    FACULTY OF SCIENCES INSTITUTE OF BIOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF NEUCHÂTEL PHD THESIS Biodiversity conservation and sustainable management in the vineyard agroecosystem: an integrated approach for different trophic levels Author: Thesis comittee: Valeria TRIVELLONE Prof. Edward A.D. MITCHELL (UNIVERSITY OF NEUCHÂTEL), thesis director Dr. Marco MORETTI (SWISS FEDERAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE WSL) Prof. Louis-Félix BERSIER (UNIVERSITY OF FRIBOURG, CH) Prof. Sergio RASMANN (UNIVERSITY OF NEUCHÂTEL) Prof. Raphaël ARLETTAZ (UNIVERSITY OF BERN, CH) April 26, 2016 Faculté des sciences Secrétariat-décanat de Faculté Rue Emile-Argand 11 2000 Neuchâtel - Suisse Tél: + 41 (0)32 718 2100 E-mail: [email protected] IMPRIMATUR POUR THESE DE DOCTORAT La Faculté des sciences de l'Université de Neuchâtel autorise l'impression de la présente thèse soutenue par Madame Valeria TRIVELLONE Titre: “Biodiversity conservation and sustainable management in the vineyard agroecosystem: an integrated approach for different trophic levels” sur le rapport des membres du jury composé comme suit: - Prof. Edward A.D. Mitchell, directeur de thèse, Université de Neuchâtel, Suisse - Prof. ass. Sergio Rasmann, Université de Neuchâtel, Suisse - Prof. Louis-Félix Bersier, Université de Fribourg, Suisse - Dr. Marco Moretti, WSL, Bellinzone, Suisse - Prof. Raphaël Arlettaz, Université de Berne, Suisse Neuchâtel, le 23 juin 2016 Le Doyen, Prof. B. Colbois Imprimatur pour thèse de doctorat www.unine.ch/sciences This work was funded by Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN), Bern (contract no. 06.0127.PZ / L21 1-1 867) (BioDiVine project), the Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, the Fondo Cotti, the Cantonal Department DECS in Tessin (Advanced Research grant), Agroscope, and the Natural History Museum in Lugano.
    [Show full text]
  • EU Project Number 613678
    EU project number 613678 Strategies to develop effective, innovative and practical approaches to protect major European fruit crops from pests and pathogens Work package 1. Pathways of introduction of fruit pests and pathogens Deliverable 1.3. PART 7 - REPORT on Oranges and Mandarins – Fruit pathway and Alert List Partners involved: EPPO (Grousset F, Petter F, Suffert M) and JKI (Steffen K, Wilstermann A, Schrader G). This document should be cited as ‘Grousset F, Wistermann A, Steffen K, Petter F, Schrader G, Suffert M (2016) DROPSA Deliverable 1.3 Report for Oranges and Mandarins – Fruit pathway and Alert List’. An Excel file containing supporting information is available at https://upload.eppo.int/download/112o3f5b0c014 DROPSA is funded by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration (grant agreement no. 613678). www.dropsaproject.eu [email protected] DROPSA DELIVERABLE REPORT on ORANGES AND MANDARINS – Fruit pathway and Alert List 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Background on oranges and mandarins ..................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Data on production and trade of orange and mandarin fruit ........................................................................ 5 1.3 Characteristics of the pathway ‘orange and mandarin fruit’ .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Phylogeny of the Genera in the Tribes Deltocephalini, Paralimnini , and Their Allies (Homoptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae)
    九州大学学術情報リポジトリ Kyushu University Institutional Repository The Phylogeny of the Genera in the Tribes Deltocephalini, Paralimnini , and Their Allies (Homoptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) Kamitani, Satoshi http://hdl.handle.net/2324/2636 出版情報:ESAKIA. 39, pp.65-108, 1999-03-31. 九州大学農学部昆虫学教室 バージョン: 権利関係: ESAKIA, (39): 65- 108. March 3 1,1999 The Phylogeny of the Genera in the Tribes Deltocephalini, Paralimnini , and Their Allies (Homoptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae) * Satoshi KAMITANI Entomological Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, 8 12-858 I Japan Abstract. The phylogenetic relationship among the genera of the subfamily Deltocephalinae and its allies occurring in Japan is studied, and the tribes Deltocephalini and Paralimnini are redefined. The phylogenetic analyses were based upon the maximum-parsimony method by the manual and computer-aided reconstruction with the Fitch characters and Wagner characters (non-weighted or weighted). Sixty-four characters were used for the phylogenetic analyses. Deltocephalini s. str. was concluded to be paraphyletic and includes 2 lineages. The DeEtocephaZus clade consists of Alobaldia, Deltocephalus, Endria, Recilia, and Paramesodes. Contrary, Futasujinus, Hengchunia, Takagiella, and Yanocephalus belong to the Paralimnus lineage with Paralimnus, Paralaevicephalus, Psnrmlotrttis, Metalimnus, Diplocolenus, Jassus, Sorhoanus, Doratura, and Aco~~~~wlla. The Deltocephalus clade was referred to the tribe Deltocephalini and the Paralimnus clade to the tribe Paralimnini. Key words: phylogeny, morphology, Deltocephalini, Paralimnini. Cica- dellidae . Introduction Both tribes of Deltocephalini and Paralimnini comprise small leafhoppers having trian- gularly produced vertex. These tribes include 137 and 69 genera, respectively, and are widely distributed in the world from the tropical to the semi-polar regions under various environmental conditions. Most of their hosts are monocotyledonous plants including rice and other agricultural crops.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies in Hemiptera in Honour of Pavel Lauterer and Jaroslav L. Stehlík
    Acta Musei Moraviae, Scientiae biologicae Special issue, 98(2) Studies in Hemiptera in honour of Pavel Lauterer and Jaroslav L. Stehlík PETR KMENT, IGOR MALENOVSKÝ & JIØÍ KOLIBÁÈ (Eds.) ISSN 1211-8788 Moravian Museum, Brno 2013 RNDr. Pavel Lauterer (*1933) was RNDr. Jaroslav L. Stehlík, CSc. (*1923) born in Brno, to a family closely inter- was born in Jihlava. Ever since his ested in natural history. He soon deve- grammar school studies in Brno and loped a passion for nature, and parti- Tøebíè, he has been interested in ento- cularly for insects. He studied biology mology, particularly the true bugs at the Faculty of Science at Masaryk (Heteroptera). He graduated from the University, Brno, going on to work bri- Faculty of Science at Masaryk Univers- efly as an entomologist and parasitolo- ity, Brno in 1950 and defended his gist at the Hygienico-epidemiological CSc. (Ph.D.) thesis at the Institute of Station in Olomouc. From 1962 until Entomology of the Czechoslovak his retirement in 2002, he was Scienti- Academy of Sciences in Prague in fic Associate and Curator at the 1968. Since 1945 he has been profes- Department of Entomology in the sionally associated with the Moravian Moravian Museum, Brno, and still Museum, Brno and was Head of the continues his work there as a retired Department of Entomology there from research associate. Most of his profes- 1948 until his retirement in 1990. sional career has been devoted to the During this time, the insect collections study of psyllids, leafhoppers, plant- flourished and the journal Acta Musei hoppers and their natural enemies.
    [Show full text]