143
Chapter 6
Capital and the Modern Kitchen
Commentators who reject the view that post-war immigration had any impact on
Australia's changing food habits frequently point to something more fundamental as an explanation: industrialisation. As Humphrey McQueen has said: "The migration of capital has been more influential than the migration of consumers or shopkeepers."'
Indeed, industrialisation, or capital, has brought about, and continues to bring about, tremendous changes in the way people eat. In 1950, it was still possible to pinpoint a tynica; v, worth of meals eater. hy most of the Angier -Ceitic nopulatior.. Then. people ate man\ of the same things. prepared in much the same way from the same ingredients as their neighbours. Though there were some socio-economic differences, most meals still fell within an English framework based on certain raw ingredients. That is not true today, even when one accounts for class differences.
Today, supermarkets all across Australia stock foods from Thailand, India, Italy, Greece,
Mexico, China and many other countries. The sheer availability of ingredients means that people can now pick and choose what to cook, and what they choose may be significantly different from what their neighbours have chosen. The food manufacturing and retailing industry has made it far easier for all Australians to cook 'ethnic,' as we shall see below.
But what they have also done is made it far easier for Australians not to cook at all. A 1999 survey of Australian food habits indicated that 90 percent of Australians use 'not-home-
1 H. McQueen, Strong, black and deadly, The Australian's Review of Books, December 1999, p. 23. 144 prepared' food in a week, with almost four meals per week falling into this category. 2 Of the meals prepared at home, a growing number are assembled rather than cooked; the
`home-meal-replacements' sold by supermarkets are a billion-dollar industry, with the largest segment being chilled and cooked meals that only need to be reheated. 3 The Sydney
Morning Herald appeared to have its finger on the pulse of the nation when it published an article entitled 'The Death of the Kitchen.' According to the article, "The household cook of the '90s [relied] on recipes of eight words: 'Pierce plastic cover and heat for two minutes.'4 Local, regional and national foods have all become more global, more processed and more packaged. This is largely due to industrialisation.
It is not within the scope of this chapter to examine industry's role in the growing 'fast foodificat9n` a meal r. contemporary ustraiiL, though th ramification:_ art pr:n -ounc — and not just on a nutritional level. 5 Rather, this chapter will show how the food industry marketed new foods to the Australian public in the post-war years, and how it helped influence the adoption of ethnic foods as a result.
Industrialisation vs. immigration
Michael Symons argues that Australia's post-war ethnic food boom was almost entirely the result of industrialisation. He maintains that because Australia never had a peasant society, it could not develop a cuisine of its own and instead had to turn to 'industrial' cuisine: preserved and transportable food brought from Britain at first, followed by food processed
2 G. Slattery, Accept no imitations, The Age Food, 11 May 1999. 3 S. Mangosi, Tie-and-Sandwich Corner Shop Threatened by Dynamics of Fast Food Industry, BIS Shrapnel News Release, 18 May 2000. 4 D. Macken, The Death of the Kitchen: Will Cooking Survive the 1990s?, The Sydney Morning Herald Spectrum, 7 September 1996, p. 10s. 5 G. Stansbury, Arresting Fast Food, M/C A Journal of Media and Culture, vol. 3, no. 2, June 2000, (hap://www.media-culture.org.au/0006/food.himl. 145 and supplied by the growing domestic and international food industries. 6 "The lack of a peasant experience — or, conversely, our total history of industrialisation — explains why we have traditionally cared less about food than any other people in history," he says.?
Nevertheless, there have been times Australians have cared about food — namely in the
1850s, the 1880s and the post-war years — although Symons maintains that these `waves of interest' in food occurred because of revolutions in transportation, the food industry, and the kitchen and not because of concurrent waves of immigration, which he claims were coincidental. Symons writes:
In the first step, the agricultural and industrial revolutions in England fed a newly estate-less bourgeoisie, who installed the first ranges, employed French cooks and
en.ic.)yed the groceries of other lands...A second step in the I 880s brought the great food companies based on the railways, roller-mills. refrigeration, brand names and chain shops. Processed foods again shook preconceptions about eating and drinking....Finally, considerable investment throughout the 1960s and 1970s took cooking out of the home and into the factory. The saturation advertising of multinational food corporations persuaded consumers to experiment once again with taste sensations.8
Certainly, developments in transportation, household appliances, shopping and the food industry resulted in tremendous changes in the availability and nature of foods and their preparation. But consumers are not entirely passive recipients of the mandates of industry, as Symons likes to suggest:
6 The debate over the existence of an Australian cuisine has been a vigorous one, but with the exception of how it relates to the wide scale adoption of ethnic foods in this country, it is beyond the scope of this thesis. To explore the subject in further detail, see Graham Pont s response to Michael Symons no peasantry/no cuisine premise in Upstart Gastronomy: A Cuisine without Peasants, presented to the Third Symposium of Australian Gastronomy: A Multiculinary Society, Adelaide, 1988 and Barbara Santich s Australian Culinary Xenophobia in the same publication, as well as Ruth Riddell (1989) and Cherry Ripe (1993). 7 M. Symons, One Continuous Picnic, Penguin Books Australia Ltd., Ringwood, Victoria, 1984 (1982), p. 12. 8 ibid., p. 228. 146
With supermarket selling, the processors manipulated both food and us. Market researchers identified gaps, food scientists devised new styles of foods, packaging companies created fetching guises, home economists found recipes to sell them, and advertising agencies presented us with persuasive social models.9
Industry will rarely produce a product for which it believes there will be no demand. And consumers will not buy products that do not fulfill their needs and desires. As Karl Marx said, "Nothing can have value without being an object of utility." 10 So while industry can influence or manipulate consumers to try an innovation, it cannot force them to adopt it if the innovation does not meet certain criteria relating to relative advantage, compatibility,
trialability and observability (see Chapter 4). Thus far. all those who have commented on the profound and permanent changes that have occurred in Australian food habits durin g the last 50 years – whether by stating that the cause was immigration or industrialisation – have missed the point. It is the innovation itself that matters. There was a reason Australians began experimenting with ethnic foods after World War Two – and a reason Italian food was the first they chose to bring into their homes: the relative advantage in adopting Italian food after World War Two was very high, higher than that of any other cuisine.
Neither immigration nor industry could have caused the wide-scale adoption of something that did not speak to a broad segment of the population; they could only facilitate the process. Immigration helped by exposing people to new foods via interpersonal channels of communication and by being the first suppliers of those foods. Industry helped by reaching
9 ibid., p. 195. 10 K. Marx, Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Vol. 1, 1867, Chapter 1, Section 1. 147 a far wider audience via mass media channels of communication and by greatly expanding the availability of those foods. Immigration and industry are not mutually exclusive. As we have seen in Chapter 5 and will further examine here, immigrant-owned businesses like
San Remo and D'Ortogna played a significant role, too. Whether they are of the multinational or 'mom-and-pop' variety, companies become change agents when they embark on advertising campaigns and promotions to encourage the adoption of their products.
Change agents and mass media channels of communication: advertising
What are change agents? Change agents influence consumers' innovation decisions in a
direction they deem desirable. Often. they do so by undertakin g a campaign that "intends to
generate specific outcomes or effects in a relatively lar ge number of individuals. usually
within a specified period of time and through an organized set of communication
activities."'
Rogers defines change agents as individuals working on behalf of change agencies, such as
an agricultural extension agent talking to farmers about a new seed on behalf of the World
Bank or the Department of Agriculture. But food manufacturers and food retailers are also
change agents in that they seek to influence consumers' decisions regarding their products –
in other words, they seek to persuade consumers to buy, and ideally adopt, their products –
and they frequently undertake advertising campaigns and special promotions as a form of
communication, often via mass media channels of communication.
11 E. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations, 4th edn, The Free Press, New York, 1995, p. 344. 148
hs
Ij
IS _SERVING I he Fighting SW/feel U l grant twat slew predsactic:n 4 Savoy Macaroni, insetted mod wilier Nutrifenth-- which leaves little for she fallu at home. Later you ll he aisle weskit" all yea want of these Continental Delicacies.
J-41.4)09 NUTRIFOODS .+Aducthava. , siut.a&alt. •arty otithAA
In the mid-1940s, Savoy Nutrifoods, a Leichardt-based company in Sydney that produced dry spaghetti and macaroni. found itself in the unusual position of reminding consumers why its proauct were appealinL even thouar: to were unavailable fo7 purchase. 7 -1,DuLl
World War Two ended in August 1945, rationing was phased out only gradually so that
Australian producers could still continue to send food parcels and exports to Britain and to troops still overseas. Savoy was not able to supply consumers with its spaghetti and macaroni until almost a year after the war ended, but it embarked upon an intensive campaign in the pages of the Women's Weekly just after the war's end to keep Savoy spaghetti and macaroni on consumers' minds, if not on their plates. Here is a sampling of some of their advertisements, most of which were accompanied by a drawing of a mustachioed chef in a toque:
Savoy Nutrifoods: Macaroni, Spaghetti – `The Food of 50 dishes": The Fighting Services still want most of our production of Savoy Macaroni, Spaghetti and other Nutrifoods – which leaves little for the folks at home. LATER you'll be able to enjoy all you want of these Continental Delicacies. Savoy Nutrifoods Pty Ltd 20 George St. Leichardt, Sydney'2
12 Australian Women's Weekly, 10 November 1945, p. 31.
149
Savoy Nutrifoods (The Food of 50 Dishes): Macaroni, Spaghetti and fathers... Scarce now... because the Fighting Services still want these sustaining high-protein foods.... But Later... you'll be able to enjoy these Continental Delicacies as often as you want.13
Savoy Nutrifoods: Savoy is the name of that wonderful Continental-style macaroni and spaghetti made here in Australia and equal to the world's finest. Very little now but there'll be plenty later when good times are back.14
Savoy Nutrifoods: From sunny Australian wheatfields come nourishing, muscle- building Savoy Nutrifoods... – spaghetti, macaroni and others. 1/2 lb. Makes a Meal for Four. Always say "Savoy!"15
So how was Savoy trying to influence the adoption of its products via these advenisernems? FirK and fort.T,-::::,-;„ ach, emphasised tha, Savo; 1.. uI ,:ifoods r patriotic company doing its duty by the armed services, which wanted its products. The reason its spaghetti and macaroni were not available to consumers was because they were
in high demand elsewhere. This was designed to appeal to consumers' patriotism and help convince them that Savoy Nutrifoods' spaghetti and macaroni were valuable products.
To further emphasise the latter point, Savoy inserted numerous references in its
advertisements to the products' many positive attributes in the hopes of persuading
consumers it would be to their relative advantage to buy Savoy macaroni and spaghetti
(when available). According to Rogers, diffusion scholars have found relative advantage to
be one of the best predictors of an innovation's rate of adoption. 16 As mentioned in Chapter
13 Australian Women s Weekly, 5 January 1946, p. 4. 14 Australian Women s Weekly, 20 April 1946, p. 46. 15 Australian Women s Weekly, 27 July 1946, p. 41. 16 E. Rogers, p. 216. 150
4, relative advantage has to do with an innovation's low initial cost, its convenience of use, the immediacy of the reward, and any social prestige it may confer.
In terms of a food, that means that if a food is relatively inexpensive, versatile, easy to prepare, and can provide the consumer with some degree of social prestige, then the chances it will be adopted sooner rather than later are very high. And if that food also fits into previously established food patterns easily, can be readily purchased (war-time not withstanding) and happens to be nutritious and tasty, then the chances are even better. Like many companies before and after it, Savoy Nutrif000ds knew the way to influence adoption was to show how its products' many positive qualities made them ideally suited to meet the needs of Australian consumers. Luckily for Savoy, spaghetti and macaroni actually met nkan:. Ey' criteria for succt'ssli acoptioi..
In its advertisements it mentioned spaghetti and macaroni's versatility ("The Food of 50 dishes"), nutritional properties ("high-protein," "nourishing, muscle-building," etc.), economy ("1/2 lb. Makes a Meal for Four,") familiarity/Australianness ("made here in
Australia and equal to the world's finest," "From sunny Australian wheatfields") and the prestige involved in preparing a 'foreign' dish ("Continental Delicacies," accompanied by a drawing of mustachioed chef in toque, presumably an Italian one). It helped that the innovation could be billed as 'delicious' and 'satisfying,' too. Spaghetti and macaroni were almost perfect scorers on the scale of adoptability.
By July 1946, Savoy's advertisements stopped mentioning the products' unavailability and started emphasizing their preparation, so perhaps by then they were becoming more widely available to the general public. It is hard to know how successful Savoy's campaign was, however. Its advertisements got smaller and smaller toward the end of 1946, and then never 151 again reappeared in the pages of the Women's Weekly. Either Savoy did so well it no longer needed to advertise in the Women's Weekly, or it went out of business or was purchased by a larger company, an event that was occurring more and more frequently as large food manufacturers discovered that smaller ones were on to something good. All traces of Savoy seem to have disappeared by the late 1940s. Nonetheless, it managed its mass media campaign as best as it could have done under difficult circumstances, and while Australian consumers may not have specifically adopted Savoy products in subsequent years, they certainly came to recognize the positive characteristics of spaghetti and macaroni so clearly presented in Savoy's advertisements. The company, however short-lived, did what it could to influence the adoption of dry pastas.
i Lt• cotipit of decades is) ,attc, spaanct-L: kval.
again regularly advertised in its own ri ght in the Women's Weekly, perhaps because it was
available and because the time had not yet come for it to be reincarnated into new, Italian-
style dishes as opposed to more traditionally English ones. Before the war and for a time
afterward, spaghetti was a very simple dish: it was usually layered with sautéed tomatoes in
a casserole, topped with grated cheese and baked. Its lack of meat relegated it to the ranks
of a luncheon or supper dish. It is doubtful that those who prepared it thought of it as a
particularly Italian dish at that point. Susan said her mother never prepared foreign foods
but used to make spaghetti:
[It was] spaghetti and tomato sauce or stewed tomato with spaghetti and things like that.... It's just one of those things you grow up with and you just always have it on the shelf. [Then when] immigration started, from Italy and so forth, ... it went into pizzas and all the different pasta. – Susan (1931, rural Armidale, NSW)
152
Although advertisements for dry spaghetti and different pastas in specifically Italian forms
did not begin to reappear in the Women's Weekly until the 1960s, spaghetti and macaroni
never left the magazine's pages. During the war years, the Women's Weekly billed spaghetti
and macaroni as foods that were easy on the ration book. It also suggested that war-time
austerity may actually have helped Australians adopt more nutritious and interesting foods:
Some shortages have made us perhaps more conscious of food values and correct methods of cooking. Not such a bad thing after all. Australia has always had the best food but not always the best cooks in the world. Here's some contriving that may be as good for the culinary skill as for the soul."
How to VC-11-E-T-C-H One of the Women's Weekly's suggestions included adding our meat ration, --b ir Elisabeth Cooke spaahett'. and macaroni to meat casseroles. The implication was Marra-on
s.:71(.1.60 clear: cooki• with pasta contributed food value and inv2rest to 111 e. Party i • r • thit ,. 1,1e /nadir raven rite • reweee -•••••• popping us, 011• lit all UK goider, eruity Women 's Weekli , played a dual role in Manx. iitit at, What I differ everyday meals. Thus. the let, who, ynu drenu It up Is a ng Tn0■111,1 with a green. green wand se peas nestliag Its Chow hem! Naturally, tilt be itabiconine illah--and a IniablY influencing the adoption of new foods: it served as a medium for astaildna one at that. Macaroni Vegetable Ring
V.., 11 001, .41
advertising by food companies, and also generated its own ..etk ate Hula. In belling apse weir? for 20 rniautee, drain. lake the airepe enure by lu milk and the Krlded•rbiL,ing., ntltior and .tittering until thlelt (14 c influential notions of what should be cooked, how, when and by reamy. Mk with the mane• tail, add I Uri/nib/1 s•dash ftrtittd. r. and pour Into Ereproor nith dIsh—sPribble breaderumba, Ilake in Nee/rate evnre whom. Though this chapter focuses on the former role, the latter i. ter 16 athletes.. kno. a dep reasiftn to the Centre ansesenni MAI ant esetitta Mt With the W race Oaralele whit will be discussed in Chapter 7. aite Wee. nerves lax. ►h.► "th sok0► t; $0.1. .111
Apart from making regular appearances in recipes, dry spaghetti and macaroni were also
continually present on the advertising pages of the Women's Weekly in relation to a variety
of sauces and cheeses, although they themselves were not being advertised. In 1950, Kraft
ran article-like advertisements in the Women s Weekly entitled: "Kraft Cheddar: How to
S-T-R-E-T-C-H your meat ration." One way to do it was by making a new version of
17 Australian Women's Weekly, 11 August 1945, p. 33. 153 macaroni cheese called macaroni vegetable ring with Kraft cheddar cheese; the recipe was provided.
Heinz also took the opportunity to advertise its products as the perfect accompaniments to spaghetti:
Heinz "57" Sauce, Heinz Tomato Sauce: Another prime favourite and appetiser is Heinz Tomato Sauce. It's fine in Haricots, popular in place of mustard with a grill, and splendid with crumbed or grilled sausages. And of course, there's nothing like it when you serve Spaghetti dishes.18
A full-page ad from May 1945 gets right to the point, instructing readers to use Heinz
Tomato Sauce "liberally when you make the Cheese and Tomato Sauce for Spaghetti
nothiro: jusi
Maxam also felt that spaghetti and macaroni were t perfect accompaniments to its cheese. It claimed its recipes were different, easy and economical additions to the menu.20
• Tinned Spaghetti
And then there was tinned spaghetti. For many Australians, tinned spaghetti is synonymous with Heinz, which has been in Australia for more than 100 years. According to the company's official history, the first Heinz products arrived in Australia from America in the 1880s to satisfy the tastes of American miners working the goldfields. 2 ' The H.J. Heinz
Co. Pty. Ltd. was officially incorporated in Australia in 1935, and its first Australian-made product was bottled horseradish, though the company immediately installed canning
18 Australian Women s Weekly, 20 January 1945, p. 14. 19 Australian Women s Weekly, 5 May 1945, p. 30. 20 Australian Women s Weekly, 1 July 1950, p. 55. 154
Mat Mug
or. M.N. o.hoo K.. • =AV • ea ,
WOK, 1.11 I.. WA.: KW. Or ...K. KK .. 04 OK .. KKK OK; 1•211 ref In. Kr. onr s.100.1 Le.. . Om. Am. Iw r dee.d. KW. AM .3,3 %KIK ...a 1.6•• je, sornean Some nap.,