Of the National Gallery in Prague

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Of the National Gallery in Prague BULLETIN OF THE NATIONAL GALLERY IN PRAGUE XVIII–XIX / 2008–2009 The Bulletin is published by the National Gallery in Prague, Staroměstské náměstí 12, 110 15 Praha 1 (tel./fax: +420-224 301 302/235, e-mail: [email protected]). Please address all correspondence to the Editor-in-Chief at the same address. The Bulletin (ISSN 0862-8912, ISBN 978-80-7035-437-7) invites unsolicited articles in major languages. Articles appearing in the Bulletin are indexed in the BHA. Editor-in-Chief: Vít Vlnas Editors: Lenka Zapletalová Editorial Board: Naděžda Blažíčková-Horová (National Gallery in Prague), Anna Janištinová (National Gallery in Prague), Lubomír Konečný (Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic in Prague), Roman Prahl (Charles University in Prague), Anna Rollová (National Gallery in Prague), Filip Suchomel (National Gallery in Prague), Tomáš Vlček (National Gallery in Prague) Design and graphic layout: Lenka Blažejová Printing: Tisk Horák a. s., Ústí nad Labem We would like to thank the Society of Friends of the National Gallery in Prague for the financial support of this issue. © National Gallery in Prague, 2009 BULLETIN NÁRODNÍ GALERIE V PRAZE XVIII–XIX / 2008–2009 Bulletin vydává Národní galerie v Praze, Staroměstské náměstí 12, 110 15 Praha 1 (tel./fax: +420-224 301 302/235, e-mail: [email protected]). Korespondenci adresujte, prosím, šéfredaktorovi na tutéž adresu. Bulletin (ISSN 0862-8912, ISBN 978-80-7035-437-7) uveřejňuje příspěvky ve světových jazycích a v češtině. Články vycházející v Bulletinu jsou indexovány bibliografií BHA. Šéfredaktor: Vít Vlnas Redakce: Lenka Zapletalová Redakční rada: Naděžda Blažíčková-Horová (Národní galerie v Praze), Anna Janištinová (Národní galerie v Praze), Lubomír Konečný (Akademie věd České republiky v Praze), Roman Prahl (Univerzita Karlova v Praze), Anna Rollová (Národní galerie v Praze), Filip Suchomel (Národní galerie v Praze), Tomáš Vlček (Národní galerie v Praze) Grafická úprav a sazba: Lenka Blažejová Tisk: Tisk Horák a. s., Ústí nad Labem Za finanční podporu tohoto čísla děkujeme Společnosti přátel Národní galerie v Praze. © Národní galerie v Praze, 2009 Cover photograph: Ferdinand Tietz, St Sebastian, c. 1750, National Gallery in Prague. Reprodukce na obálce: Ferdinand Tietz, Sv. Šebestián, kolem 1750. Národní galerie v Praze. Hlavní partner NG v Praze / Major partner of the NG in Prague: Patron NG v Praze / Sponsor of the NG in Prague: Hlavní mediální partner NG v Praze / Major media partner of the NG in Prague: BULLETIN of the National Gallery in Prague XVIII–XIX / 2008–2009 NárodNí Galerie v Praze Contents Pavel Štěpánek Dos tablas de Juan de Flandes y Pedro de Campañ a en la colección 6 de la Galería Nacional de Praga Jan Mikeš The Pietà of Lásenice and Sculpture of the Late Beautiful Style 21 in South Bohemia Olga Kotková Adam Pokorný Technological Research into the Painting, St Luke Drawing the Virgin, 31 by Jan Gossaert, called Mabuse Olga Pujmanová L’eco dei dipinti rinascimentali italiani negli schizzi delle collezioni barocche 42 Tomáš Hladík Two Unknown Works of Ferdinand Tietz in the Collections of the National 50 Gallery in Prague Zoltán Dragon Károly Markó und sein Prager Gemälde 60 Tomáš Sekyrka “A Vision of the Tired Souls” – Re-discovered Hand-Written Magazines 67 of the Mánes Society of Fine Artists Obsah Pavel Štěpánek Juan de Flandes a Pedro de Campaña ve sbírce Národní galerie v Praze 76 Jan Mikeš Pieta z Lásenice a sochařství pozdního krásného slohu na jihu Čech 87 Olga Kotková Adam Pokorný Technologický průzkum obrazu Sv. Lukáš kreslí P. Marii od Jana Gossaerta, 93 zv. Mabuse Olga Pujmanová Ohlas italských renesančních obrazů v skicách barokních sbírek 99 Tomáš Hladík Dvě neznámé práce Ferdinanda Tietze ve sbírkách Národní galerie v Praze 105 Zoltán Dragon Károly Markó a jeho pražská malba 112 Tomáš Sekyrka „Vise znavených duší“ – znovuobjevené rukopisné časopisy Spolku 116 výtvarných umělců Mánes Dos tablas de Juan de Flandes y Pedro de Campaña en la colección de la Galería Nacional de Praga Problemas de atribución y datación PAVEL Š T ĚPÁNEK Pavel Štěpánek es catedrático de la Universidad Palacký de olomouc. Se especializa en el arte español. 1. Juan de Flandes Juan de Flandes es una asignación La atribución y la datación de dos cuadros para un pintor todavía anónimo, en la Galería Nacional de Praga que probablemente flamenco, (o, aunque con se relacionan a la vez con dos países menos probablilidad, español, formado gobernados por la misma dinastía, España en los Países Bajos), quien estaba activo y los Países bajos, de los pintores Juan en los años de 1496 a 1504 en España, de Flandes y Pedro de Campaña (Peeter primero al servicio de Isabel de Castilla, Kempeneer), respectivamente, varían desde y después de fallecer ésta, en diferentes hace casi un siglo sin haberse llegado lugares de la Península Ibérica, al a conclusiones irrefutables. Se trata de menos hasta el año 1519, cuando muere. dos pinturas pequeñas, casi miniaturas, Lamentablemente, sobre la vida de este pero de altísmia cualidad, situadas hoy en excepcionalmente buen pintor no tenemos la instalación permanente de la Galería documentos, menos una docena, pero Nacional de Praga, que desperataban, que se refieren a sus encargos y no nos desde hace tiempo, dudas acerca de la dicen absolutamente nada acerca de su atribución y la datación, pero no en personaje. Tampoco conocemos su origen, cuanto a la calidad. su formación y sus destinos en España, Puesto que en el últimos tiempos han solo su nombre que se da como Juan aparecido no pocos estudios que prestan de Flandes. Casi todo lo que sabemos atención al asunto tanto en detalle de él, ha sido derivado de la lectura de como en la visión global, – lo cual es su obra. Puede suponerse que antes que importante en caso de un artista como fuera llamado a los servicios de la Reina, Juan de Flandes, cuya obra fue comentada debía haber mostrado cierta experiencia hasta hace poco sólo por una pequeña y calidad, de modo que la fecha de su monografía,1 pero no se han sacado nacimiento se estima por lo menos hacia conclusiones definitivas ni en el libro más 1465. Según las señas de su estilo se nuevo de la investigadora española Pilar piensa que su posible formación pudo Silva Maroto2 –, intentaré presentar aquí haber ocurrido en la zona de Brujas algunos argumentos y señalar aquellas o de Gante. Hubo también un intento de relaciones nuevas o marginadas, o subrayar identificarle con Jan Straat, pues una de otras que ya han sido aceptadas hasta las tablas del Políptico de Isabel la Católica cierto punto.3 lleva una inscripción „Juan Astrat“, lo cual La tabla de pequeñas dimensiones Cristo es la forma hispanizada de ese nombre.6 mostrado al pueblo (Ecce Homo)4 (fig. 1) Dado que no se trata de su firma, no atribuida hasta ahora a Juan de Flandes puede tomarse como punto de partida (nacido hacia 1465; activo en España desde justificable. Recientemente, se ha intentado 1496; murió en 1519 en Palencia),5 fue identificar, a Juan de Flandes con Annekin legado a la Pinacoteca de la Sociedad de (es decir „pequeño Juan“) Veranneman, amigos patrióticos del arte, antecesora de formado bajo Hans Memling antes de la actual Galería Nacional de Praga, por el 1464.7 doctor en derecho Jan Kaňka en 1866. Sus Precisamente a Juan de Flandes (aunque destinos anterirores no son conocidos. no exclusivamente) se le hace responsable Bulletin of the National Gallery in Prague 6 XVIII–XIX / 2008–2009 Fig. 1 Juan de Flandes, Cristo mostrado al pueblo (Ecce Homo), Galería Nacional de Praga. Bulletin of the National Gallery in Prague XVIII–XIX / 2008–2009 7 porque en la pintura castellana del paso portando la cruz, y en el fondo, la subida del gótico al renacimiento perduran restos al Calvario, casi en miniatura. de un naturalismo aún medieval, aún En la escena principal se nota a Cristo, góticamente narrativo, así como formulas envuelto en el manto, con corona de arcáicas, que sobreviven hasta bien entrado espinas, de pie en la escalera de un el s. XVI.8 edificio, al lado de Pilatos, quien apacigua Juan de Flandes sigue siendo, en el gentío reunido abajo. Presencian la sustancia, pintor expresionista de vieja escena unas figuras asomadas de las índole en la técnica virtuosa flamenca, ventanas de un palacio de dos plantas ante todo en comparación con Jan van en estilo del renacimiento temprano. La Eyck, cuya visita a la Península Ibérica escena está completada por dos perros dentro del marco de una comitiva que yacen en el primer plano, delante diplomática, culminando con la audiencia de la escalera, cuyas juntas, de geometría ofrecida por el Rey de Castilla Juan II regular, están animadas apenas por escasas el año de 1429, ha sido considerada cañas de hierba. Al fondo se divisan como una apertura del arte flamenco en edificios en estilo románico, utilizado por este campo y un estímulo para crearse los pintores del gótico tardío para expresar hoy ya generalmente reconocido estilo las escenas del Viejo Testamento. El estilo hispanoflamenco. Aparte de la Virgen de romano representó, entonceds, los edificios Covarrubias, la copia de la época de la „orientales“ en aquellas situaciones, Fuente de la vida en el Prado y La Virgen cuando debía distinguirse entre el mundo de los consejeros en Barcelona, hoy nada cristiano y el judaismo („oriente“). Se testimonia o copias o recepción directa trata del llamado simbolismo camuflado.11 de la manera de van Eyck. Según otras La preponderancia del estilo renacentista opiniones,9 para la recepción del estilo a manera de bambalinas en toda la obra flamenco en la pintura española fue del pintor llevó a la investigadora española mucho más importante el pintor catalán Elisa Bermejo a pronunciar un hipótesis Lluís Dalmau, a quién el rey de Aragón que después de su salida de Flandes, el Alfonso V mandó a los Países Bajos.
Recommended publications
  • Julius S. Held Papers, Ca
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt3g50355c No online items Finding aid for the Julius S. Held papers, ca. 1921-1999 Isabella Zuralski. Finding aid for the Julius S. Held 990056 1 papers, ca. 1921-1999 Descriptive Summary Title: Julius S. Held papers Date (inclusive): ca. 1918-1999 Number: 990056 Creator/Collector: Held, Julius S (Julius Samuel) Physical Description: 168 box(es)(ca. 70 lin. ft.) Repository: The Getty Research Institute Special Collections 1200 Getty Center Drive, Suite 1100 Los Angeles 90049-1688 [email protected] URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10020/askref (310) 440-7390 Abstract: Research papers of Julius Samuel Held, American art historian renowned for his scholarship in 16th- and 17th-century Dutch and Flemish art, expert on Peter Paul Rubens, Anthony van Dyck, and Rembrandt. The ca. 70 linear feet of material, dating from the mid-1920s to 1999, includes correspondence, research material for Held's writings and his teaching and lecturing activities, with extensive travel notes. Well documented is Held's advisory role in building the collection of the Museo de Arte de Ponce in Puerto Rico. A significant portion of the ca. 29 linear feet of study photographs documents Flemish and Dutch artists from the 15th to the 17th century. Request Materials: Request access to the physical materials described in this inventory through the catalog record for this collection. Click here for the access policy . Language: Collection material is in English Biographical / Historical Note The art historian Julius Samuel Held is considered one of the foremost authorities on the works of Peter Paul Rubens, Anthony van Dyck, and Rembrandt.
    [Show full text]
  • Webfile121848.Pdf
    0 TABLE OF CONTENTS Press release ................................................................................................................................................... 2 Catalogue text: Nico Van Hout - Curator ...................................................................................................... 6 Gallery texts ................................................................................................................................................... 11 Transversal Activities ................................................................................................................................... 14 BOZAR MUSIC ......................................................................................................................................... 14 BOZAR LITERATURE ............................................................................................................................. 17 BOZAR EXPO ........................................................................................................................................... 17 BOZAR CINEMA ...................................................................................................................................... 18 Rubens for families ...................................................................................................................................... 19 Disovery trails for families (6>12) ........................................................................................................... 19
    [Show full text]
  • 'Wie Das Zeichnen Wol Zu Begreiffen Sey?'1 The
    © Nina Stainer ‘Wie das Zeichnen wol zu begreiffen sey?’1 The Role of Sculptors’ Drawings in the Seventeenth Century Nina Stainer Abstract The early modern sculptor’s education north of the Alps has yet to be thoroughly explored. Three collections of sculptor’s drawings, originating from the Bavarian workshop of Thomas Schwanthaler (1634-1707), found in different locations across central Europe, allow insights into their importance to the early modern sculptor. Use and collection of drawings had mainly practical purposes for instruction and communication inside the workshop. However, inscriptions suggest that sketches were also crafted for personal reasons. The drawings crossed borders not only physically—being taken along on the itinerant craftsmen’s journeys—but also in their functions as media of both professional purpose and personal memorabilia. The article explores the use of drawings in a non-academic environment, presenting examples from the collections. Keywords: Early modern sculpture, Mobility of Early Modern artists, Sculptor’s drawings. ***** In the first part of his extensive historical work, the Teutsche Academie, published first in 1675, the German painter and art writer Joachim von Sandrart included a chapter discussing the re•bus Issue 9 Spring 2020 3 © Nina Stainer meaning of drawing for the arts of painting and sculpture. Describing the best ways to acquire drawing skills he states that many sculptors lack practice in sketching on paper and therefore prefer to produce small-scale models from clay or wax.2 Scholarship
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Version for Tablet and Desktop (Pdf)
    THE RUBENS HOUSE HIGHLIGHTS THE RUBENS HOUSE HIGHLIGHTS 1 THE HOUSE In 1610 Peter Paul Rubens (1577–1640) and his first wife Isabella Brant (1591–1626) bought a house and a piece of land in Antwerp. In the years that followed, the artist had the building enlarged after his own design, adding a covered, semi-circular statue gallery, a studio, a portico in the style of a triumphal arch, and a garden pavilion. The improvements gave his home the air of an Italian palazzo and embodied Rubens’s artistic ideals: the art of Roman Antiquity and the Italian Renaissance. He also assembled an internationally admired collection of paintings and classical sculpture at the house. Rubens lived and worked here until his death in 1640. The building is believed to have retained its original appearance until the mid-seventeenth century, at which point it was fundamentally altered. Nowadays, the portico My dear friend Rubens, and garden pavilion are the only more or less intact Would you be so good as to admit the bearer of this survivals of the seventeenth-century complex. letter to the wonders of your home: your paintings, the marble sculptures, and the other works of art in your house and studio? It will be a great delight for him. Your dear friend Nicolas-Claude Fabri de Peiresc Aix-en-Provence, 16 August 1626 2 3 1 2 Jacob Harrewijn (c. 1640–after 1732) Frans Duquesnoy (1594–1643) The Rubens House in Antwerp, The Sleeping Silenus 1684, 1692 Gilded bronze and lapis lazuli Engravings (facsimiles) This relief illustrates a story told by the Roman poet These two prints are the earliest known ‘portraits’ Virgil (70 BC–19 AD).
    [Show full text]
  • Collected Coral and the Study of Petrified Luxury in Early Modern Antwerp
    Dutch Crossing Journal of Low Countries Studies ISSN: 0309-6564 (Print) 1759-7854 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ydtc20 ‘Unusual Excrescences of Nature’: Collected Coral and the Study of Petrified Luxury in Early Modern Antwerp Marlise Rijks To cite this article: Marlise Rijks (2019) ‘Unusual Excrescences of Nature’: Collected Coral and the Study of Petrified Luxury in Early Modern Antwerp, Dutch Crossing, 43:2, 127-156, DOI: 10.1080/03096564.2017.1299931 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/03096564.2017.1299931 © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Published online: 15 Mar 2017. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 1005 View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ydtc20 DUTCH CROSSING 2019, VOL. 43, NO. 2, 127–156 https://doi.org/10.1080/03096564.2017.1299931 ‘Unusual Excrescences of Nature’: Collected Coral and the Study of Petrified Luxury in Early Modern Antwerp Marlise Rijks Centre for the Arts in Society (LUCAS), Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands ABSTRACT KEYWORDS Many seventeenth-century Antwerp collections contained coral, coral; collections; Antwerp; both natural and crafted. Also, coral was a pictorial motif depicted petrifaction; 17th century by Antwerp artists on mythological scenes, still lifes, gallery pic- tures, and allegories. Coral was many things at the same time: a commodity crafted into jewellery and objets d’art, a popular collectable in its natural shape, a motif for Antwerp painters, an essential commodity in the European-Indian trade network, a naturalia associated with classical mythology as well as with the Blood of Christ, and a problematic naturalia that raised ques- tions about classification, origins and natural processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Rubenianum Fund
    2021 The Rubenianum Quarterly 1 From limbo to Venice, then to London and the Rubenshuis Towards new premises A highlight of the 2019 Word is out: in March, plans for a new building for exhibition at the Palazzo the Rubens House and the Rubenianum, designed by Ducale in Venice (‘From Titian Robbrecht & Daem architecten and located at Hopland 13, to Rubens. Masterpieces from were presented to the world. The building will serve as Flemish Collections’), this visitor entrance to the entire site, and accommodate visitor ravishing Portrait of a Lady facilities such as a bookshop, a café and an experience Holding a Chain is arguably centre. The present absence of such facilities had led to an one of the most exciting initial funding by Visit Flanders, which, in turn, incited the Rubens discoveries of the City of Antwerp to address all infrastructural needs on site. past decade and perhaps the These include several structural challenges that the finest portrait by the artist Rubenianum has faced for decades, such as the need for remaining in private hands. climate-controlled storage for the expanding research The picture is datable to collections. The new building will have state-of-the-art the beginning of Rubens’s storage rooms on four levels, as well as two library career, and was probably floors with study places, in a light and energy-efficient painted either during his architecture. The public reading room on the second floor will be accessible to all visitors via an eye-catching spiral short trip from Mantua to staircase, and will bring the Rubenianum collections Spain (between April 1603 within (visual and physical) reach of all, after their and January 1604), or not somewhat hidden life behind the garden wall.
    [Show full text]
  • Georg Petels Bildhauerarbeiten Für Die Moritzkirche
    369 Georg Peteis Bildhauerarbeiten für die Moritzkirche THOMAS ESER Kein anderer der an Bau und Ausstattung von genscheine, Sockel und Attribute entledigt wur­ St. Moritz beteiligten Künstler nimmt den kunst­ den, weil diese "entstellend" und "nicht historischen Rang Georg Peteis ein. Ein beliebi­ ursprünglich" gewesen seien. 6 Auch Peteis Werke ger Griff ins Bücherregal genügt: Vom Taschenle­ in St. Moritz waren und sind von diesen Purifi­ xikon bis zum Kunsthistorikerhandbuch gilt zierungen jüngster Zeit merklich betroffen. Petel heute unisono als bedeutendster Bildhauer des Frühbarock im deutschsprachigen Raum.1 Mit derart hoher, gelegentlich pathetischer Wert­ Petel und Augsburg schätzung begegnete ihm nicht erst die relativ junge Wissenschaft der Kunstgeschichte. Schon Petel war kein gebürtiger Augsburger. 1601 oder für die Bildhauer- und Künstlerkollegen seiner 1602 im Oberbayerischen Weilheim geboren/ eigenen Epoche war er der kunstberiembte bild­ unternahm er nach einer Ausbildung in Mün• hauer bedel von Augsburg gewesen. Das 18. chen bereits in jungen Jahren ausgedehnte Rei­ Jahrhundert verehrte ihn gar als Deutschen sen, die ihn in die damaligen Kunstzentren des Michael Angelo Buonarota, und ausnahmsweise Kontinents führten und weltbewandert machten galt in Peteis Fall der Patriot auch im eigenen - ganz im Sinne damals noch recht neuer euro­ Land, wenn ihn das lokale Augsburger Künstler• päischer Künstlerkarrieren, wie sie seine etwas lob zum künstlichsten Bildhaur~ so Augspurg älteren niederländischen Bildhauerkollegen hate kürt. Mehr als alle anderen Augsburger Giambologna, Adriaen de Vries oder Hubert habe Petel den Namen eines Künstlers verdient, Gerhart vorgelebt hatten. Zu Peteis Stationen so Paul von Stetten d.J. im ersten Band seiner zählten Paris und Genua, Livorno und Rom Augsburger Kunstgeschichte von 1779.2 (1620/1623), anschließend bis 1625 die südli• Dann wird es stiller um Peteis Name.
    [Show full text]
  • Seven Last Words
    HAYDN SEVEN LAST WORDS Guido Pellizzari organ Joseph Haydn 1732-1809 The Seven Last Words of our Saviour on the Cross Die sieben letzten Worte unseres Erlösers am Kreuze Le sette ultime Parole del nostro Redentore in Croce Hob.XX:1/c 1. L’Introduzione. 6. Sonata V. Adagio 9’17 Maestoso & Adagio 6’07 Sitio 2. Sonata I. Largo 5’59 7. Sonata VI. Lento 7’11 Pater, Pater dimitte illis quia Consumatum est nesciunt quid faciunt 8. Sonata VII. Largo 7’31 3. Sonata II. Grave e Cantabile 8’02 In Manus tuas Domine, comendo Hodie mecum, hodie mecum eris in Spiritum meum Paradiso 9. Il Terremoto. Presto 2’00 4. Sonata III. Grave 8’55 Ecce Mulier filius tuus 5. Sonata IV. Largo 7’51 Deus meus, Deus meus et quid dereliquisti me Guido Pellizzari organ The Seven Last Words of Our Saviour on the Cross is perhaps the most expressive Fratelli Serassi Organ Op.433 (1837), at the Church of Santa Maria Maddalena, composition by Franz Josef Haydn and one of the most inspired works of music Desenzano del Garda, Italy ever written. It originated in 1786 from a commission later described in a letter to his editor by the author himself as follows: “Some fifteen years ago I was requested Source: Composizioni del Sigr Giuseppe Haydn / Sopra le sette ultime Parole del nostro Redentore in Croce / Consistenti in / Sette Sonate / con un Introduzione ed al Fine un’Teremoto / ridotte / Per il by a canon of Cádiz to compose instrumental music on the Seven Last Words of Clavicembalo o Forte Piano / Opera 49.
    [Show full text]
  • Hercules and Samson
    Originalveröffentlichung in: Liebenwein, Wolfgang ; Tempestini, Anchise (Hrsgg.): Gedenkschrift für Richard Harprath, München 1998, S. 311-322 Jan K. Ostrowski Hercules and Samson A Long Way of a Composition Motif from Stefano Maderno to Johann Georg Pinsel* Let us start from the end, since such was the logic of writing this text. Around 1750, on the south-eastern territory of the former Polish Commonwealth, today forming part of Ukraine, there appeared an outstanding but very mysterious sculptor, Johann Georg Pinsel. Although his oeuvre was the object of lively discussions since the 1930s, 1 the researchers could not for a very long time find any data concerning his biography. Even his first name remained unknown, being replaced by the term »Master«. Only recently has this obstacle been overcome and the artist’s Christian names established as well as his family relations and the approximate date of his death - 1761 or 1762.* However, still nothing is known about the date and place of Pinsel’s birth or the centre in which his extraordinary art was shaped. During about ten years of his documented activity in Poland, Johann Georg Pinsel lived at Buczacz, a small town in Podolia, which belonged to Mikoiaj Potocki, a great eccentric and patron of Late Baroque art. Everything indicates that Pinsel was his court artist, though he also carried out other commissions, mainly in Lvov and its environs. His artistic output is relatively well known 3 despite its disastrous devastation in the period of the domination of Soviet barbarism. Among the works unanimously associated with the hand of Johann Georg Pinsel we find two groups very much alike, representing a hero tearing a lion apart with his hands.
    [Show full text]
  • Bronze, Boxwood, and Ivory in the Robert H. Smith Collection of Renaissance Sculpture
    Bronze, Boxwood, and Ivory in the Robert H. Smith Collection of Renaissance Sculpture A second supplement to the catalogue volume Art of the Renaissance Bronze 1500–1650 Bronze, Boxwood, and Ivory in the Robert H. Smith Collection of Renaissance Sculpture EIKE D. SCHMIDT, DYLAN SMITH, ALISON LUCHS, SHELLEY STURMAN, KAREN SERRES, EMILY PEGUES, KATHERINE MAY, JUDY OZONE & SIMONA CRISTANETTI A second supplement to the catalogue volume Art of the Renaissance Bronze 1500–1650 Published by Cover illustration: Leonhard Kern Lust (cat. 75) Inside front cover: Gérard van Opstal Detail of Bacchanalian Frieze (cat. 79) Inside back cover: Francesco Fanelli Detail of Turk on Horseback Attacked by a Lion (cat. 72) Back cover illustration: Nicolò Roccatagliata Cleopatra (cat. 69) Photography by Lee Ewing Digital radiography by Dylan Smith and James Gleason © Text by Eike D. Schmidt, Dylan Smith, Alison Luchs, Shelley Sturman, Karen Serres, Emily Pegues, Katherine May, Judy Ozone, Simona Cristanetti First published in the UK by The Burlington Magazine Publications Ltd. 2015 All right reserved. Printed in England by Stephens & George Printers Limited, Wales ISSN 0007 6287 2 CONTENTS Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................5 PART ONE: BRONZE STATUETTES 66. African Bather
    [Show full text]
  • Corpus Rubenianum Ludwig Burchard
    CORPUS RUBENIANUM LUDWIG BURCHARD PART XXII HERBERT W. ROTT PALAZZI DI GENOVA ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS AND ENGRAVINGS VOLUME ONE CORPUS RUBENIANUM LUDWIG BURCHARD PART XXII (1) PALAZZI DI GENOVA HERBERT W. ROTT In 1622 Rubens published a splendid volume on Genoese Renaissance architecture, with precise engravings depicting façades and plans of a dozen villas and palaces, reproduced from the original architectural drawings which were in the master’s own collection. He followed this publication some time later with further editions to which he added plans and elevations of another twenty-three Genoese buildings. In publishing famous exam­ ples of ‘modern’ architecture, Rubens intended to trace the development of architecture in his own country and all over Europe. He believed that the true principles of good building, both aestheti­ cally and functionally, were discovered by the Ancients and rediscovered in Renaissance Italy. He published his book at the height o f his fame, and thus succeeded in presenting himself not only as a great painter, but also as a connoisseur and authoritative teacher in the field o f architecture. The present publication explains the history of Rubens’s book and analyses in detail his com ­ ments and interpretations of the original plans. The illustrations show the engravings and original drawings in juxtaposition, and there are additional comparative illustrations in the Catalogue Raison­ né, reproducing photographs of the actual build­ ings as well as other later engravings and plans. Rubens regarded his volume of engravings as a collection of patterns for use by architects and patrons in his home country. But for us today it stands for much more: it throws light on Rubens’s concern for finding an artistic identity for the Southern Netherlands and moreover it offers us an aspect of Rubens’s personality not found else­ where in his art - his role as an editor.
    [Show full text]
  • Het Rubenshuis.Pdf
    ubens kocht het pand in november 1610, kort na zijn R huwelijk met Isabella Brant. Eind 1608, na een achtjarig verblijf in Italië, keerde hij naar Antwerpen terug en ging wonen in de Sint-Michielsstraat, de huidige KloosterstraaL In een brief van 10 april 1609 aan Johan Faber schrijft hij dat hij nog twijfelt of hij zich blijvend in de Scheldestad zou vestigen of definitief naar Rome zou terugkeren. Met aantrekkelijke aanbiedingen hadden de aartshertogen erop aangedrongen dat hij zou blijven. Maar Rubens voelde er weinig voor om opnieuw hoveling te worden. Aan Antwerpen kon hij wel wennen, maar het heimwee naar Rome was groot. Anderzijds was hij toch ook oog voor de gunstige conjunctuur onder het beleid van Albrecht en Isabella. De bekrachtiging van het Twaalfjarig Bestand (1609-1621), een rustpauze in de lange oorlog tegen het opstandige Noorden, bood hem een gunstig perspectief, het vooruitzicht op vrede en de daaraan verbonden welvaart. Ondanks zijn huiver voor het hofleven, trad Rubens op 23 september 1609 als hofschilder in dienst van de aartshertogen. Aan deze functie waren een aantal niet te versmaden rechten en voordelen verbonden zoals een jaargeld, vrijstelling van belastingen, alsook van gilde- en militieverplichtingen. Bovendien kon hij bedingen dat hij zich niet aan het Brusselse hof moest ophouden, maar zich in Antwerpen mocht vestigen en er ook voor eigen rekening kon werken. Dit laatste was ongetwijfeld een doorslaggevend argument. Hij besloot te blijven. Spoedig bleek welk een uiterst gunstig klimaat om zich te ontplooien Antwerpen hem te bieden had. Door zijn huwelijk met de dochter van Jan Brant, die stadssecretaris was, wist hij de oude bindingen van zijn familie met het stadspatriciaat te bestendigen.
    [Show full text]