USAID Tiry LGSP a Gauge for Good Governance

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

USAID Tiry LGSP a Gauge for Good Governance 51 t ar USAID tirY LGSP FROM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE GOVERNMENT • COMMUNITY • CITIZENS LOCAL GOVERNANCE SUPPORT PROGRAM A Gauge for Good Governance Local Governance Support Program March 2008 USAID SP 4;4 041. FROM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE GOVERNMENT • COMMUNITY • CITIZENS AID LOCAL GOVERNANCE SUPPORT PROGRAM Local Governance Assessment Tool: A Gauge for Good Governance March 2008 ERTI INTERNATIONAL RTI International In collaboration with: International City/County Management Association Computer Assisted Development Incorporated Democracy International Table of Contents I. Introduction I II. Description of the Local Governance Assessment Tool 2 III. Local Governance Performance: Findings on the Five Good Governance Principles 5 Accountability Participation Effectiveness Equity Transparency IV. Conclusions and Recommendations 10 Annex I. LGAT Principles, Indicators and Operational Questions I 3 Annex 2. LGAT Scores - Local Governments by Province I 5 Annex 3. LGAT Scores - Local Governments by Ranking I 6 LGAT Graphics Graph I. Graphic Representations of LGAT results 5 Graph 2. Composite Local Government Scores 6 Graph 3. Scores for Accountability 7 Graph 4. Scores for Participation 7 Graph 5. Scores for Effectiveness 8 Graph 6. Scores for Equity 9 Graph 7. Scores for Transparency 10 i Local Governance Assessment Tool: A Gauge for Good Governance' I. Introduction Improving governance is now widely regarded as an essential part of a comprehensive development strategy. Empirical measurements of governance have become key develop- ment indicators at the national level in the past decade. In the context of decentralized Indonesia, an effective measurement of governance at the level of local government would not only highlight underperforming local governments but also help identify constraints to good governance within governments. Good governance is strongly correlated with economic development. Studies show that improving the quality of institutions raises per capita income and promotes growth in the long term. While higher income is also correlated with better governance, the causal relationship is stronger from governance to income. Recent World Bank research2 esti- mates that even modest improvements in governance can lead to significant increases in income. As is the case in many developing countries, Indonesia needs to improve its governance practices. Past weaknesses have significantly contributed to the problems faced by the country since the onset of the Asian financial crisis.3 Considering the growing recognition of the link between good governance and successful development, it is important to devise a tool that can be used to assess and monitor the practice of good governance by local governments. However, there is no widely accepted tool that is utilized to monitor or evaluate the practice of good governance at local level. Recent efforts at evaluating governance in Indonesia have included an opinion survey on good governance conducted by the University of Gajah Mada and a survey conducted by the World Bank across Indonesia.4 As its inception, the Local Governance Support Program (LGSP) initiated the Local Governance Assessment Tool (LGAT) which applied the tool in some of its initial partner local governments in Indonesia. The purpose of LGAT was to understand how local governments apply common principles of good governance and thereby to assess the strengths and weaknesses of current governance practices at the local level. It is hoped that LGAT can evolve into a practical tool that is widely accepted and used by national and local governments, as well as by individuals and groups who are interested in monitoring the effectiveness of local level governance practices. This paper was prepared by Luce Bulosan, LGSP Performance Monitoring Adviser (October 2005—May 2007), with contri- butions by Peter Rooney, LGSP Performance Monitoring Adviser,Trias Utomo, Senior Monitoring and Evaluation Specialist, and Judith Edstrom, LGSP Chief of Party. 2 A Decade of Measuring the Quality of Governance,World Bank, 2007. 3 Penerapan Tata Kepemerintahan yang Baik (Good Public Governance in Brief), Bappenas, 2006. 4 The Governance and Decentralization Survey,World Bank, 2007. Local Governance Support Program 1 Local Governance Assessment Tool This paper presents the experience of LGSP in applying the LGAT in order to illustrate the utility of the tool for establishing benchmarks in good governance, monitoring changes over time, and identifying institutional needs that can help to strengthen capacity development programs. I. Description of the Local Governance AssessmentTool Overview of the Questionnaire. The good governance index utilized for the LGSP assessment was adopted from the Global Campaign on Urban Governance initiated by UN—Habitat.5 Five of the original ten principles of good governance were adopted for LGAT. The complete framework was not fully adopted because a more concise tool was needed that was easy to facilitate at the local level. The five core aspects of governance adopted in LGAT are: effectiveness, equity, participation, accountability, and transparency. These five principles are supported by 20 specific indicators which are operationalized into 70 questions that are verifiable through secondary documents and interviews.6 A categorical answer 'yes' or 'no' is provided to each question. An answer that favored a good governance outcome is assigned a value of one (I) and a zero (0) value is given to an answer that does not reflect a positive governance answer. A Good Local Governance Index is derived from the total percentage score obtained. The questionnaire was pre-tested in one district and resulted in a revision to the framework. The aim is to develop a self-assessment tool for local governments and a simpler tool is considered more appropriate. For each of the five principles a list of indicators is provided. The selection of indicators was based on: (a) relevance for governance principles; (b) ease and cost of data collection, including availability and time required to obtain data; (c) measurability and universality of use for the general population and diverse populations. The LGAT Conceptual Framework 5 Principles 70 20 Specific Good Local of Good p Operational Indicators Governance Governance Questions s The Global Campaign on Urban Governance, UN-HABITAT, 2002. 6 A full list of indicators and survey questions is provided in Annex I. 2 Local Governance Support Program Local Governance Assessment Tool The Software Application. To facilitate data analysis, LGSP developed a PC-based application to ensure a standard system for data entry and analysis. The system automatically calculates the score for each of the principles and the composite Good Governance Index. The figures below show examples from the LGAT software application package that is available at LGSP's online databank.? Examples from LGAT Software Application Package Questionnaire Responden Responder 1,2.3,4 Dinar Pendalikan Effectiveness Equity Participation Accountability Tramper. 1- Major Sources of income 2 Predictability of transform 3 - Con or Satisfaction Principle 2.1 Is the amount of fund transfers from n, i•rial government known in advance of the local budgeting process Tab • Yes O No • NA 2.2 If No, How many months were the national tablished) IM month (al 2.3 How information on the amount of fund transfe Information on the amount of fund bansfers was Obta,ned 2.4 Do you know the "baste employed to determine, 0 Yes • No • NA 2.5 If yes, please specify the basic of transfer: a. Population b. Area • Yes 0 No • NA c, CROP per capita 0 Yes • No • NA d. Human Development index • Yes 0 No 0 NA e. Contraction cost Index 0 Yes • No • NA I. Other, Please specify other basic Toot, ,,, , USA1D LOCAL GOVERNANCE ASSESSMENT 1' LGSP Policy and Performance Measurement ..... GOOD GOVERNANCE INDEX PRINCIPLE I: EFFECTIVENESS Indicator I: Major sources of income 1.1 Budget predictability 2002 2903 2004 a Total local governance budget (plan)/expected) - in million rupiah 10,120.0 12.000.0 14,000,0 b. Total local government budget (actualx) - in million rupiah 12,500.0 12,000.0 15,000.0 c. Proportion of actuals and expected local government budget 123.5 % 100.0 % 107.1 1.2 Local government total revenue per capita 2002 2003 2004 A. Local government revenue per capita - in million rupiah 12,500.0 12,000.0 l 50,000.0 h. Total population - in thousand rupiah 11)0.0 150.0 200.0 c. Consumer price index 11)0.0 1115,0 109.2 d. Local government revenue per capita at constant price (in Rp_000) 125 0 762 606.0 7 See www.lgdatabank.or.id. Local Governance Support Program 3 Local Governance Assessment Tool Data Collection. To implement the tool, LGSP commissioned local research institutions operating within the project's target jurisdictions. Service providers were chosen based on their research experience, particularly in the locality. All researchers participated in an intensive training workshop to ensure a common understanding of the indicators and methodologies utilized to measure the indicators. In each district, an evaluation team was established, composed of a senior social scientist, two field researchers and a data encoder. Data collection took approximately five days and was carried out between April and June 2006 in all districts. Key informant interviews and Focus Group Discussions (FGD) were the main data collection methods. Using a semi-structured questionnaire, key informant interviews were conducted to capture information on the indicators
Recommended publications
  • North Sumatra
    PROVINCE INFOGRAPHIC NORTH SUMATRA ACEH Langsa KOTA BARAT ACEH LAN GSA TEN GAH ACEH TIMU R Karang Baru Suka Makmue ACEH NAGAN TAMIANG Meulaboh RAYA GAYO LUES Blang Kejeren Kembar Stabat KOTA ACEH MEDAN Blangpidie BARAT The boundaries and names shown and the DAYA Binjai Medan SERDANG LANGKAT KOTA designations used on this map do not imply Medan BEDA GAI ACEH BINJAI official endorsement or acceptance by the Lubuk Sei Rampah SELATAN Kutacane Pakam Tebing KOTA United Nations. DELI Tinggi TEB INGTIN GGI ACEH SERDANG TEN GGARA Tapak BATU Tuan KARO Sibayak BARA Legend: Sinabung Limapuluh KOTA TANJUNGBALAI Administrative Boundary Kabanjahe Raya DAIRI Pematangsiantar Kisaran KOTA Tanjung Province Province Capital PEMATANGSIANTAR SIMA LUN GUN Balai Sidikalang District District Capital KOTA SUBU LUSSALAM SAMOSIR ASAH AN Subulussalam PAKPAK Pangururan Toba Transportation Population BARAT Population counts at 1km resolution Salak Aek Kanopan Toll road Sinabang ACEH TO BA LABUHANBATU SIN GKIL UTARA Primary road 0 HUMBANG SAMOSIR SIMEULU E Balige LABUHANBATU Secondary road 1 - 5 HASUNDUTAN Port 6 - 25 Singkil Dolok Sanggul Bagan Siapi-api TAPANULI Imun Airport 26 - 50 TENGAH TAPANULI Rantau LABUHANBATU Prapat UTARA Helatoba-Tarutung SELATAN 51 - 100 Tarutung Other 101 - 500 Kota Pinang 501 - 2,500 ROKAN Volcano KOTA TAPANULI HILIR Water/Lake 2,501 - 5,000 SIB OLGA SELATAN Sibolga PADANG 5,000 - 130,000 Pandan Sipirok Coastline/River Sibualbuali LAWAS UTARA Lubukraya KOTA Gunung Tua Lotu GUNUNGSITOLI NIAS Padang BENGKALIS UTARA Gunung Sitoli Sidempuan
    [Show full text]
  • North Sumatra
    NORTH SUMATRA The USAID Indonesia Urban Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Penyehatan Lingkungan untuk Semua (IUWASH PLUS) project is a five-and-a-half-year initiative designed to assist the Government of Indonesia in increasing access to water supply and sanitation services as well as improving key hygiene behaviors among urban poor and vulnerable populations. USAID IUWASH PLUS works with governmental and donor agencies, the private PLUS NORTH SUMATRA sector, NGOs, communities and others to achieve the following "high level" results: • An increase access to improved water supply service for 1,100,000 people USAID IUWASH in urban areas of which at least 500,000 are from the poorest 40% of the population (also referred to as the “bottom 40%” or “B40”); and • An increase access to safely managed sanitation for 500,000 people in urban areas. USAID IUWASH PLUS works with 35 Local Governments across Indonesia located in 8 provinces that includes North Sumatra, West Java, Central Java, East Java, South Sulawesi, Maluku, North Maluku and Papua, and 2 special areas in DKI Jakarta and Tangerang district. In North Sumatra, USAID IUWASH PLUS works in five cities/districts located in Medan city, Deli Serdang district, Tebing Tinggi city, Pematangsiantar city and Sibolga city. 72,981 km² Is the area of North Sumatra province that has 25 districts, 8 cities, 444 14.73 million is the population of North Sumatra sub-districts, 693 urban province and it is the fourth province with the largest villages, 5,417 villages, and population after West Java, Central Java and East Java with the 419 islands.
    [Show full text]
  • RENCANA KERJA DAN ANGGARAN SATUAN KERJA PERANGKAT DAERAH Formulir RKA SKPD PEMERINTAH PROVINSI SUMATERA UTARA 2.2 Tahun Anggaran : 2019
    RENCANA KERJA DAN ANGGARAN SATUAN KERJA PERANGKAT DAERAH Formulir RKA SKPD PEMERINTAH PROVINSI SUMATERA UTARA 2.2 Tahun Anggaran : 2019 Urusan Pemerintahan : 3 . 05 URUSAN PEMERINTAHAN PILIHAN Energi dan Sumberdaya Mineral Organisasi : 3 . 05 . 01 Dinas Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral Sub Unit Organisasi : 3 . 05 . 01 . 01 Dinas Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral REKAPITULASI ANGGARAN BELANJA LANGSUNG BERDASARKAN PROGRAM DAN KEGIATAN SATUAN KERJA PERANGKAT DAERAH JUMLAH LOKASI TARGET KINERJA KODE URAIAN KEGIATAN (KUANTITATIF) Tahun n Tahun Belanja Pegawai Barang & Jasa Modal Jumlah n + 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 = 5 + 6 + 7 9 3.05 . 3.05.01 . 01 Program Pelayanan Administrasi Perkantoran 1,404,640,000.00 3,161,068,284.00 16,000,000.00 4,581,708,284.00 0.00 3.05 . 3.05.01 . 01 . 01 Penyediaan Jasa Surat Menyurat Medan 0.00 29,996,000.00 0.00 29,996,000.00 0.00 3.05 . 3.05.01 . 01 . 02 Penyediaan Jasa Komunikasi, Sumber Daya Air dan Listrik Medan 0.00 265,000,000.00 0.00 265,000,000.00 0.00 3.05 . 3.05.01 . 01 . 03 Penyediaan Jasa Administrasi Perkantoran/keuangan Medan 1,003,980,000.00 0.00 0.00 1,003,980,000.00 0.00 3.05 . 3.05.01 . 01 . 04 Penyediaan Jasa Kebersihan Kantor Medan 0.00 265,650,000.00 0.00 265,650,000.00 0.00 3.05 . 3.05.01 . 01 . 05 Penyediaan Alat Tulis Kantor Medan 0.00 79,999,190.00 0.00 79,999,190.00 0.00 3.05 .
    [Show full text]
  • Wilayah Sumatera
    AREA KOTA RS / KLINIK ALAMAT NO. TELEPON NO. FAX SUMATERA SIBOLGA RS. METTA MEDIKA JL. SUTOYO SISWOHARJO NO.34 PASAR BARU, SIBOLGA KOTA 0631-25007/25008/081260753048| 0631-25006 SUMATERA PEMATANG SIANTAR RS. HORAS INSANI JL. MEDAN KM.2,5 PEMATANG SIANTAR 0622- 433444,433877,433666,4337770622-433777|0622-433777 0622-21384 SUMATERA PEMATANG SIANTAR RS. HARAPAN PEMATANG SIANTAR JL. FAREL PASARIBU NO : 21 PEMATANG SIANTAR, SUMATERA UTARA 0622-21162, 21612| 0622-435301 SUMATERA PEMATANG SIANTAR RS. VITA INSANI JL. MERDEKA, NO.329 0622-22520| 0622-24521/29133 SUMATERA MEDAN RS. ADVENT MEDAN JL. GATOT SUBROTO, KM. 4 061 - 4524875/4574025| 061-4154839 SUMATERA MEDAN RS. COLUMBIA ASIA MEDAN (D/H GLENI MEDAN) JL. LISTRIK 2A MEDAN 20112 061-4566368| 061-4566585/4515453 SUMATERA MEDAN RS. MATERNA JL. TEUKU UMAR NO.11 061 -4514222| 061-4155392 SUMATERA MEDAN RS. DELI JL. MERBABU NO.18-20, MEDAN (061) 4565229| (061) 4552361 SUMATERA MEDAN RS. BUNDA THAMRIN MEDAN JL. SEI BATANG HARI NO. 28/30 MEDAN SUNGGAL 061-4553928,88813615,4557318,4557218,4553918| 061-4558218 SUMATERA MEDAN MURNI TEGUH MEMORIAL HOSPITAL JL. JAWA NO. 2 SIMPANG JL. VETERAN 061-80501888/777| 061 - 80501800 SUMATERA MEDAN RS. MITRA SEJATI MEDAN JL. AH. NASUTION PANGKALAN MAHSYUR NO.7, MEDAN 061-7875967/ 7881682| 061-7850261 SUMATERA MEDAN RS. MARTHA FRISKA MULTATULI JL. MULTATULI KOMP. MULTATULI INDAH NO 1 MEDAN 061-4149666 / 08286103148| 061-4154761 SUMATERA MEDAN RS. SILOAM DHIRGA SURYA JL. IMAM BONJOL NO. 6, KEL. PETISAH - MEDAN 20112 (061) 8888 1900 EXT. 22601| (061) 8888 1933 SUMATERA MEDAN RS. KHUSUS BEDAH SETIA BUDI JL.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.1.30 Indonesia North Sumatra Port of Gunungsitoli
    2.1.30 Indonesia North Sumatra Port of Gunungsitoli Port Overview Port Picture Description and Contacts of Key Companies Port Performance Discharge Rates and Terminal Handling Charges Berthing Specifications General Cargo Handling Berths Port Handling Equipment Container Facilities Customs Guidance Terminal Information MULTIPURPOSE TERMINAL GRAIN AND BULK HANDLING MAIN STORAGE TERMINAL Stevedoring Hinterland Information Port Security Port Overview Administratively located in Nias Regency, North Sumatra Province, Gunungsitoli port is the main access gate to Nias island. Thus, Gunungsitoli port plays an important role in the development of Nias island and connecting the island with the surrounding regions. The distance from Sibolga port to Gunungsitoli i s approximately 80 miles. Port website:https://www.pelindo1.co.id/cabang/sbg/id/default.aspx Port Location and Contact Country Indonesia Province or District North Sumatra, Gunungsitoli Nearest Town or City with Distance from Port Tarutung, North Tapanuli District (60 km) Port's Complete Name Gunungsitoli Port Latitude 01°1828 N Longitude 97°3625 E Managing Company or Port Authority PT. Pelindo I Gunung Sitoli Branch Management Contact Person Tema General section Phone: 0822 7438 0939 Nearest Airport and Airlines with Frequent International Arrivals/Departures Domestic airport: Binaka Garuda Indonesia Citilink Wings Air Aviastar Port Picture Page 1 Description and Contacts of Key Companies For more information on port contacts, please see the following link:4.4 Indonesia Port and Waterways Company Contact Lists Port Performance Page 2 Tidal:High water spring:0.5 mandLow – water spring: 0.2 m Wave: High wave in the harbour pool as between 0.75 – 2 m (June – November) Seasonal Constraints Occurs Time Frame Rainy Season Yes September - December Major Import Campaigns No Other Comments Discharge Rates and Terminal Handling Charges Port rates and charges of various services can be referred to the government regulation under PP.11 tahun 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Buku Keterangan Peta Satuan Lahan Dan Tanah Lembar Sibolga (0617)
    BUKU KETERANGAN PETA SATUAN LAHAN DAN TANAH LEMBAR SIBOLGA (0617) DAN PADANGSIDEMPUAN (0717) SUMATERA EXPLANATORY BOOKLET OF THE LAND UNIT AND SOIL MAP OF THE SIBOLGA (0617) AND PADANGSIDEMPUAN (0717) SHEETS, SUMATRA Oleh/By : D. Subardja, Kartiwa Djuanda, Yayat Hadian, Samdan CD., Yehu Mulyadi, Wahyu Supriatna dan/and Junus Dai. SKALAJSCALE 1 : 250.000 105u 0 0912/ y '0 0911 PROYEK PERENCANAAN DAN EVALUASI SUMBER DAYA LAHAN PENGELOLAAN DATA BASE TANAH PUSAT PENELITIAN TANAH DAN AGROKLIMAT BADAN PENELITIAN DAN PENGEMBANGAN PERTANIAN LAND RESOURCES EVALUATION AND PLANNING PROJECT SOIL DATA BASE MANAGEMENT CENTRE FOR SOIL AND AGROCLIMATE RESEARCH AGENCY FOR AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 1990 r KEPALA PUSAT PENELITIAN TANAH DAN AGROKLIMAT The Director of the Centre for Soil and Agrociimate Research DR SURYATNA EFFENDI Kepala Unit Im piementasi Proyek Head of the Project Implementation Unit DR M. SUDJADI Dewan Redaksi Editorial Board A. Hidayat Junus Dai D. Subardja P. Buurman Diterbitkan dan dibiayai oleh Bagian Proyek Pengelolaan Data Base Tanah PUSAT PENELITIAN TANAH dan AGROKLIMAT BADAN PENELITIAN dan PENGEMBANGAN PERTANIAN DEPARTEMEN PERTANIAN Published and financed by The Soil Data Base Management Project CENTRE FOR SOIL and AGROCLIMATE RESEARCH AGENCY for AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH and DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT of AGRICULTURE BUKU KETERANGAN PETA SATUAN LAHAN dan TANAH LENBAR SIBOLGA (0617) DAN PADANGSIOENPUAN (0717), SUMATERA Explanatory booklet of the LAND UNIT and SOIL map of the Sibolga (0617) and Padangsidempuan (0717) Sheets,
    [Show full text]
  • The Global Maritime Nexus: Challenges in Managing Marine Area in North Sumatera Province
    The Global Maritime Nexus: Challenges in Managing Marine Area in North Sumatera Province Suhaidi1, Rosmalinda1 and Riadhi Alhayyan1 1Faculty of Law, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Jl. Universitas No 4 Kampus USU, Medan, Indonesia Keywords: Global maritime nexus, readiness, local government, North Sumatera Province. Abstract: Global maritime nexus is a strategic idea. Indonesia should realize it in order to ensure the community welfare. This study figures out the answer of study in 8 months in North Sumatera province. This study focuses on the readiness of North Sumatera government in realizing Indonesia as a global maritime nexus in Malacca Strait. One strategy to achieve the vision is regulated it in the regional spatial management. Through in depth interviews and Focus Group Discussion (FGD) which conducted to collect information related to preparedness in policy and challenges of local government in marine management found that the provincial government has local regulation No. 2 of 2017 concerning the regional spatial plan of North Sumatera province (RTRWP) in 2017-2037 which in line with the 2nd and 3rd pillars of the global maritime nexus. The presence of the new RTRWP needs to be socialized in order to disseminate the idea of Indonesia global maritime nexus. It is not only a strategic issue but also an idea which can be applied in the program of local government organizations (OPD) which located contiguous to the sea such as North Sumatera province. 1 INTRODUCTION development of the fishing industry by placing fishermen as the main pillars; (3) commitment to Article 25 A of Indonesian Constitution 1945 encourage the development of maritime amendment 4 states that the united country of infrastructure and connectivity by building sea tolls, Republic of Indonesia is an archipelagic country seaports, logistics and shipping industries, as well as which is characteristic of the archipelago with its maritime tourism; (4) maritime diplomacy that territory and boundaries and rights established by invites all Indonesian partners to cooperate in the law (UUD 1945).
    [Show full text]
  • Jurnal Ilmiah Maksitek Issn. 2655-4399
    JURNAL ILMIAH MAKSITEK Vol. 5 No. 3 ISSN. 2655-4399 September 2020 THE REVITALIZATION OF BATAKNESE LANGUAGE IN TANJUNG BALAI : A STUDY CASE AT SEI TUALANG RASO TANJUNG BALAI, NORTH SUMATERA RANI FAIRUS SEKOLAH TINGGI EKONOMI AL-HIKMAH [email protected] Abstract-The study was conducted to find out the revitalization of Bataknese language in Tanjung Balai. The subject of the study was 123 households in three streets in Sei Tualang Raso subdistrict, Tanjungbalai city. This research design was qualitative descriptive design. The instrument for collecting the data was questionnaire. The data was analyzed by reading the result of questionnaires which have been filled by respondents. The result of analysis showed that: 1) Increase the proficiency speakers of Bataknese language. The skill of the language proficiency includes listening, speaking, reading and writing. (2) Grow positive attitude towards bataknese language. (3) Expand the use of bataknese language distribution. Spreading the use of bataknese language can be done by means of print, electronic, device cyberspace. Keywords: Bataknese, History of Bataknese, and Revitalization INTRODUCTION Language revitalization can be viewed as a form of language policy that seeks to halt and reverse this process of shift: different policy measures are adopted with the aim of ensuring that a vulnerable language community does not decline and disappear, but rather demonstrates 'a new-found vigour' (Paulston, 1993: 279). This, it is claimed, will occur when policy steps successfully address a range of
    [Show full text]
  • The Dutch Colonial Economic Policy: Coffee Exploitation in Tapanuli Residency, 1849–1928
    KEMANUSIAAN Vol. 25, No. 2, (2018), 49–71 The Dutch Colonial Economic Policy: Coffee Exploitation in Tapanuli Residency, 1849–1928 *BUDI AGUSTONO1 JUNAIDI1,2 1Department of History, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, University of Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia Current affiliation: 2Department of History, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, University of Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia *Corresponding author: [email protected] Published online: 26 September 2018 To cite this article: Agustono, B. and Junaidi. 2018. The Dutch colonial economic policy: Coffee exploitation in Tapanuli residency, 1849–1928. KEMANUSIAAN the Asian Journal of Humanities 25(2): 49–71, https://doi.org/10.21315/kajh2018.25.2.3 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.21315/kajh2018.25.2.3 Abstract: The occupation of Tapanuli district was an objective of Dutch colonial settlement in the Indonesian archipelago. The expansion of the area was not only due to political factors but also due to vast economic ambition. This was evident from the trade monopoly of coffee from the beginning of Dutch occupation in the area. The colonial government’s desire for the economy was gratified by the implementation of coffee forced-farming in Tapanuli. The forced-farming system created huge profits for the treasury of the Dutch colonial government. The colonial exploitation was not confined to coffee forced-farming only but also extended to the local people, who were forcibly exploited for their labour as coolies to carry the coffee beans from remote storehouses to the port. The suffering of the local people worsened when Tapanuli district was categorised as a taxpayer district by the end of 19th century.
    [Show full text]
  • BAB III ARAHAN STRATEGIS NASIONAL BIDANG CIPTA KARYA Untuk KABUPATEN SERDANG BEDAGAI
    PENYUSUNAN RPI2-JM KABUPATEN SERDANG BEDAGAI TAHUN 2015 - 2019 BAB III ARAHAN STRATEGIS NASIONAL BIDANG CIPTA KARYA untuk KABUPATEN SERDANG BEDAGAI Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah memuat arahan struktur ruang dan pola ruang. Struktur ruang merupakan arahan susunan pusat-pusat permukiman dan sistem jaringan prasarana dan sarana yang berfungsi sebagai pendukung kegiatan sosial ekonomi masyarakat yang secara hirarkis memiliki hubungan fungsional, sedangkan pola ruang merupakan arahan distribusi peruntukan ruang dalam suatu wilayah yang meliputi peruntukan ruang untuk fungsi lindung dan peruntukan ruang untuk fungsi budidaya. Arahan struktur dan pola ruang yang tertuang dalam RTRW menjadi perhatian pembangunan bidang Cipta Karya untuk mewujudkan permukiman yang layak huni dan berkelanjutan, sesuai tujuan dari penyelenggaraan penataan ruang yaitu keharmonisan antara lingkungan alam dan lingkungan buatan, keterpaduan dalam penggunaan sumber daya alam dan sumber daya buatan dengan memperhatikan sumber daya manusia, serta pelindungan fungsi ruang dan pencegahan dampak negatif terhadap lingkungan akibat pemanfaatan ruang. 3.1 Arahan RTRW Nasional Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Nasional PP 26/2008 yang selanjutnya disebut RTRWN adalah arahan kebijakan dan strategi pemanfaatan ruang wilayah Negara. Penataan ruang wilayah nasional bertujuan untuk mewujudkan : a. Ruang wilayah nasional yang aman, nyaman, produktif, dan berkelanjutan; b. Keharmonisan antara lingkungan alam dan lingkungan buatan; c. Keterpaduan perencanaan tata ruang wilayah nasional, provinsi,
    [Show full text]
  • Optimization Mursala Waterfall in Improving Community Potency, Welfare Through Local Wisdom in Central Tapanuli Regency
    International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN: 2319-7064 Index Copernicus Value (2016): 79.57 | Impact Factor (2017): 7.296 Optimization Mursala Waterfall in Improving Community Potency, Welfare through Local Wisdom in Central Tapanuli Regency Siti Nurul Chaerunisha1, Purwo Sri Suracmatiningsih2, Dr. Syarifuddin Gassing M.Si3 1Post Graduate Student of Communication Faculty of Universitas Persada Indonesia Y.A.I, Indonesia 2Post Graduate Student of Communication Faculty of Universitas Persada Indonesia Y.A.I, Indonesia 3Lecturers of Communication Faculty of Universitas Persada Indonesia Y.A.I, Indonesia Abstract: The tourism sector in each country, if it is developed properly, will improve the economy of a country. In Indonesia there is a good number of tourism which can be developed by the local government. Unfortunately, however, not all tourism sectors get the local government’s decently sufficient attention. The thing is the same with Mursala waterfall in Tapanuli Tengah regency; it is still deprived of the local government’s attention. Mursala waterfall is a unique one because the water directly falls into the sea and it is located between Sibolga and Nias. Special attention is required by the Local Government in developing this tourism by involving local communities and local wisdom to create local community empowerment. In this study the author uses a qualitative approach with descriptive research type of data collection by way of observation, interview, and bibliography study. The result of the study clearly indicates that the tourism sector – if it is optimized involving various community-based tourism programs – may potentially empower the community through local wisdom and create community development around the Mursala waterfall.
    [Show full text]
  • How Widespread Was the Tapanuli Orangutan and What Led to Its
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.11.246058; this version posted August 11, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 How widespread was the Tapanuli 2 orangutan and what led to its decline? 3 Erik Meijaard1,2,3,*, Safwanah Ni'matullah1, Rona Dennis1, Panut Hadisiswoyo4, Julie 4 Sherman1,5, Onrizal6 and Serge A. Wich7 5 1 Borneo Futures, Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei Darussalam 6 2 Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK 7 3 School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia 8 4 Orangutan Information Center, Medan, Indonesia 9 5 Wildlife Impact. PO Box 31062, Portland, Oregon, USA 10 6 University of Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia 11 7 Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK 12 13 * Corresponding author 14 E-mail: [email protected] 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.11.246058; this version posted August 11, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 15 Abstract 16 The Tapanuli orangutan (Pongo tapanuliensis) is the most threatened great ape species in the 17 world. It is restricted to an area of about 1,000 km2 of mostly hill forest where fewer than 800 18 animals survive in three declining subpopulations.
    [Show full text]