R4 Rural Resilience Initiative Annual Report January - December Contents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

R4 Rural Resilience Initiative Annual Report January - December Contents R4 Rural Resilience Initiative annual report January - December Contents Executive Summary 1 The R4 Model of Managing Risk 3 Project Status Summary 5 Key Accomplishments 9 Monitoring and Evaluation 2012 13 Financial Transaction Result s 2012 (Ethiopia) 16 Risk Reduction Results 2012 (Ethiopia) 21 Challenges and Lessons Learned 24 R4 Senegal Pilot Roll-out Plan 27 R4 Policy Engagement Plan 34 Financial Progress 35 Conclusion 36 Appendix I: Partners and Institutional Roles 37 Appendix II: Payout in Ethiopia Press Release, December 2012 38 Appendix III: Media Citations & Resources 40 Appendix IV: Rural Resilience Event Series 43 Appendix V: Summary of Transacted Index 2012 (Ethiopia) 47 Cover: Women are planting seedlings in Tigray, Ethiopia. Eva-Lotta Jansson / Oxfam America Woman participating in a small women’s savings group in her village in Koussanar, Senegal as part of Oxfam’s Saving for Change program. R4 will work with these groups for the savings and credit components. Katie Naeve / Oxfam America Executive Summary For the 1.3 billion people living on less than a dollar a day who partners, launched what is now called the R4 Rural Resilience depend on agriculture for their livelihoods, vulnerability to Ini8a8ve, known as R4, referring to the four risk management weather and climate-related shocks is a constant threat to food strategies that the ini8a8ve integrates. Ini8ated in 2010, R4 builds security and well-being. As climate change drives an increase in on the ini8al success of HARITA (Horn of Africa Risk Transfer for the frequency and intensity of natural hazards, the challenges Adapta8on), an integrated risk management framework faced by food-insecure communi8es struggling to improve their developed by Oxfam America and REST, together with Ethiopian lives and livelihoods will also increase. The ques8on of how to farmers and several other na8onal and global partners 1 to enable build rural resilience against climate-related risk is cri8cal for poor farmers to strengthen their food and income security addressing global poverty. through a combina8on of improved resource management (risk reduc8on), insurance (risk transfer), microcredit (prudent risk In response to this challenge, Oxfam America and the Relief taking), and savings (risk reserves). Society of Tigray (REST), together with local and interna8onal 1. See Appendix I: ‘R4 partners and institutional roles’ for full list of R4 partners and institutional roles. R4 ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY - DECEMBER 2012 1 R4 has successfully expanded the HARITA opera8ons in Eth iopia, stakeholders to understand the social, economic and ins8tu8onal and has kicked-off the implementa8on of R4 Pilot 2013 in Senegal context have led to the selec8on of a pilot area and to the ini8al together with the World Food Programme (WFP). concep8on of program components. The program in Senegal is tailored to address gaps in exis8ng weather and climate risks In Ethiopia this year, R4 exceeded its goal of reaching 15,000 tools employed by food-insecure households. Through rigorous farmers by successfully extending insurance services to more than monitoring, evalua8on, and learning processes, the program in 70 villages 2 in 11 districts 3 in Tigray, Ethiopia thanks to its Senegal will adjust these tools as it scales up to new areas and innova8ve insurance-for-asset (IFA) component. This agricultural communi8es. season also marked the first-ever set of large weather index- insurance payouts 4 to small scale farmers in Ethiopia offered With its successful initiation on the ground, the R4 partnership through the program. The payout was triggered by rainfall is set to enable many more vulnerable people to graduate from es8mates measured by advanced satellite technology. Over food insecurity through a community-oriented, risk 12,200 farmers benefited from drought protec8on through management-focused, and market-based approach to achieve insurance payouts, receiving money when they needed it the rural resilience. most. The program’s strategic expansion to areas where farmers are capable of paying for insurance with cash, while con8nuing to The following report on our project expansion in 2012 serve the poorest and most vulnerable farmers through the highlights the project activities and results in Ethiopia, including government’s Produc8ve Safety Net Programme, is a progressive the insurance payout in the project this year and the Senegal step toward building a commercial insurance market in rural pilot design for the 2013 roll-out. We are grateful to The Ethiopia and toward sustainability. Rockefeller Foundation, Swiss Re, and USAID for their continued support of R4. In Senegal, na8onal assessments and a series of consulta8ons conducted with government, private sector and community 2. This report uses the word “village to refer to the Ethiopian term tabia, or subdistrict. Tabia is the Tigrigna language name for kebele, that is, the smallest administrative unit of the Ethiopian federal government (UN Emergency Unit for Ethiopia, 2003). Ethiopia’s administrative unit structure hierarchy follows: region (e.g., Tigray) > zone (e.g., Eastern Tigray) > woreda/district (e.g., Kola Tamben) > tabia/subdistrict (e.g., Adi Ha) > kushet. 3. The word “district” here refers to the Ethiopian term woreda. It is approximately equivalent to a district in other countries (Food and Agriculture Organization, 2010). 4. See Appendix II: ‘Payout in Ethiopia –press release–December 2012‘ for more details on the 2012 payout R4 ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY - DECEMBER 2012 2 e R4 Model of Managing Risk The R4 Rural Resilience Ini8a8ve is centered on integra8ng four (ii) prudent risk taking (credit and livelihoods diversifica8on); (iii) risk management tools into one resilience building approach; (i) risk transfer (insurance); and (iv) risk reserves (savings) (See community disaster risk reduc8on using food and cash for assets; figure 1). FIGURE 1. R4 is a holis.c approach to risk management • Increases land and labor produc8vity • Promotes resiliency via physical interven8ons and • Diversifies income into more value added social processes ac8vi8es • Covers insurable and uninsurable risks • Creates disposable assets for further risk • Customized at community level reduc8on and transfer $ • Robust across climate scenarios Prudent Risk Taking Risk Reducon R4 $ • Smoothes income Risk Reserves Risk Transfer • Stabilizes income • Builds community financial and social • Promotes quick recovery and prevents asset loss capital • Provides incen8ves for risk reduc8on • Facilitates risk-taking R4 builds on the innova8ons established by HARITA in Ethiopia, which made insurance affordable through integra8on with an exis8ng produc8ve safety net program. Evolution of R4 The R4 Rural Resilience Ini8a8ve strives to empower half a million The R4 Rural Resilience Ini8a8ve leverages and expands on the food-insecure people to improve their lives and livelihoods in the lessons of HARITA to bring together four key risk management next five years. The overriding strategic objec8ve of R4 is to tools in a holis8c approach that empowers food-insecure families. achieve long-term impacts well beyond the ini8al program. This This innova8ve approach is designed to con8nuously grow and will be accomplished through the dual sustainability outcomes of evolve, based on evalua8on and ongoing learning, to provide building a sustainable commercial market for risk management, further protec8on and empowerment to food-insecure and strengthening government support for rural resilience. households. R4 ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY - DECEMBER 2012 3 FIGURE 2. The evolu.on of R4 Safety Net + Risk Reduc.on Only (R1) Safety Net + HARITA (R3) Safety Net + Rural Resilience (R4) $ $ Prudent Prudent Risk Reducon Risk Taking Risk Reducon Risk Taking Risk Reducon R4 R4 R4 $ Risk Transfer Risk Reserves Risk Transfer Since 2005, Oxfam America’s savings-led microfinance program, Oxfam’s experience in community savings and gradually moving Saving for Change, has achieved broad success in crea8ng to an improved model that integrates savings as the fourth effec8ve, pro-poor savings structures for rural villages in Mali, component in the framework (see Figure 2). Senegal, El Salvador, and Cambodia. In Senegal, R4 is building on R4 ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY - DECEMBER 2012 4 Cows and goats head home as the rain approaches in Tigray, Ethiopia. Eva-Lotta Jansson / Oxfam America Project Status Summary Ethiopia The 2012 agricultural season marked the expansion of R4 to 76 “e rain in this area is very unpredictable - this year it villages in the Tigray region, including the 43 villages covered in came very late and ended early – so we got very little the 2011 agricultural season in partnership with REST. As a result from our harvest. For me, this insurance is like saving – of this year’s drought condi8ons in parts of the project area, you put in your money now and you get it back when more than 12,200 farmers in 45 villages received a share of the rain is bad and the crops don’t do well.” $322,772 in payouts. Because of varia8ons in the regional severity of the drought, some farmers in less severe loca8ons had G/Micheal Geday from Abraha Atsbaha village par8al payouts, while many, in the most badly hit areas, received full payouts. This is the first-ever set of large payouts to small scale farmers in Ethiopia triggered by advanced satellite villages, farmers were offered insurance through a cash-only technology used by the program. op8on. Of the total farmers who enrolled this year, 68 percent purchased insurance by paying 10
Recommended publications
  • Livelihood Zone Descriptions
    Government of Senegal COMPREHENSIVE FOOD SECURITY AND VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS (CFSVA) Livelihood Zone Descriptions WFP/FAO/SE-CNSA/CSE/FEWS NET Introduction The WFP, FAO, CSE (Centre de Suivi Ecologique), SE/CNSA (Commissariat National à la Sécurité Alimentaire) and FEWS NET conducted a zoning exercise with the goal of defining zones with fairly homogenous livelihoods in order to better monitor vulnerability and early warning indicators. This exercise led to the development of a Livelihood Zone Map, showing zones within which people share broadly the same pattern of livelihood and means of subsistence. These zones are characterized by the following three factors, which influence household food consumption and are integral to analyzing vulnerability: 1) Geography – natural (topography, altitude, soil, climate, vegetation, waterways, etc.) and infrastructure (roads, railroads, telecommunications, etc.) 2) Production – agricultural, agro-pastoral, pastoral, and cash crop systems, based on local labor, hunter-gatherers, etc. 3) Market access/trade – ability to trade, sell goods and services, and find employment. Key factors include demand, the effectiveness of marketing systems, and the existence of basic infrastructure. Methodology The zoning exercise consisted of three important steps: 1) Document review and compilation of secondary data to constitute a working base and triangulate information 2) Consultations with national-level contacts to draft initial livelihood zone maps and descriptions 3) Consultations with contacts during workshops in each region to revise maps and descriptions. 1. Consolidating secondary data Work with national- and regional-level contacts was facilitated by a document review and compilation of secondary data on aspects of topography, production systems/land use, land and vegetation, and population density.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Project Title: «Strengthening Rural Women's Livelihood for A
    Project Title: «Strengthening rural women’s livelihood for a sustainable economic development in the Eastern region of Senegal» Project Symbol: GCP/SEN/069/GAF Recipient country: Senegal Government/Other counterparts: Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Equipment (MAER) Expected EOD (Starting Date): 10th of January 2018 Expected NTE (End date): 1st of March 2021 Contribution to FAO’s strategic • The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Framework: Strategic Objectives (SO)/Priorities: The project will contribute to the following Strategic Objectives (SO), Outcomes, and Products: SO2: Make agriculture, forestry and fisheries more productive and sustainable. Outcome 201 – Producers and natural resources’ administrators adopt practices that increase and improve agricultural production in a sustainable way. Product 20101- Innovative methods are managed, tested, and disseminated by producers to increase, in a sustainable manner, productivity and production in order to curtail environmental degradation and climate change. SO4: Enable inclusive and efficient agricultural and food systems. Outcome 402 – The private and public sector strengthens the efficiency and inclusion of the agricultural value chain, specifically agribusinesses and agro-food chains. Product 40203 – Agribusiness and agro-food stakeholders receive technical support at the management level in order to promote the inclusiveness, efficiency and sustainability of the agro-food chains. Outcome 403 – Public-private policies, improved financial instruments, and increased
    [Show full text]
  • Limiting Maize (Zea Mays L.) Yield in Two Agro-Ecological Zones of the Southern-Central of Senegal
    JCBPS; Section B; February 2021 –April 2021, Vol. 11, No. 2; 396-406, E- ISSN: 2249 –1929 [DOI: 10.24214/jcbps.B.11.2.39606.] Journal of Chemical, Biological and Physical Sciences An International Peer Review E-3 Journal of Sciences Available online atwww.jcbsc.org Section B: Biological Sciences CODEN (USA): JCBPAT Research Article Evaluation of nutrients (N, P, K) limiting maize (Zea mays L.) yield in two agro-ecological zones of the southern-central of Senegal. Arona Sonko1,2*, Ndèye Yacine Badiane Ndour2, Moussa N’Diénor2, Aliou Faye3, Niokhor Bakhoum4 & Saliou Ndiaye1 1 Ecole Nationale Supérieure d’Agriculture, Université Iba Der Thiam de Thiès, B.P A296 - Thiès – Sénégal. 2 Laboratoire National de Recherches sur les Productions Végétales, Institut Sénégalais de Recherches Agricoles, Bel Air, Route des Hydrocarbures, BP 3120 - Dakar - Sénégal. 3 Centre National de Recherches Agronomiques de Bambey, Institut Sénégalais de Recherches Agricoles, BP 53 CNRA – Bambey - Sénégal. 4 LMI LAPSE, Laboratoire Commun de Microbiologie IRD/ISRA/UCAD, Centre de Recherche de Bel Air, BP 1386, CP 18524 – Dakar - Sénégal. Received: 24 February 2021; Revised: 17 March 2021; Accepted: 30 March 2021 Abstract: Cereals response to nutrients varies according to soil characteristics in sub-Saharan Africa. Thus, subtractive trials were conducted to identify the major nutrients (N, P, K) limiting maize yield in Senegal central south (Nioro site) and east (Sinthiou Malème site) soils. In each zone, we set up a randomized complete block experiment on station with 4 replicates and on farm in 5 scattered fields. The following treatments were evaluated: non-fertilizer (T) control, completely fertilized with NPK at high doses (150N-40P2O5-40K2O kg/ha), and three other treatments (PK, NK, NP) resulting from the successive omission of one element from the NPK.
    [Show full text]
  • ETHIOPIA - TIGRAY REGION HUMANITARIAN UPDATE Situation Report Last Updated: 12 Feb 2021
    ETHIOPIA - TIGRAY REGION HUMANITARIAN UPDATE Situation Report Last updated: 12 Feb 2021 HIGHLIGHTS (12 Feb 2021) As of the 12 of February, UN agencies and NGOs have received approval from the Federal Government for 53 international staff to move to Tigray. Humanitarians continue to call for the resumption of safe and unimpeded access to adequately meet the rising needs in the region, which have far outpaced the capacity to respond. Current assistance pales in comparison to the increasing needs particularly in rural areas, still out of reach and where most people lived before the conflict. Continued disruptions to essential services pose huge hurdles to the scale up of humanitarian response, more than three months into the conflict. The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. © OCHA Ongoing clashes are reported in many parts of Tigray, while aid workers continue to receive alarming reports of insecurity and attacks against civilians. KEY FIGURES FUNDING (2020) CONTACTS Saviano Abreu 950,000 1.3M $1.3B $722.9M Communications Team Leader, People in need of aid Projected additional Required Received Regional Office for Southern & Eastern before the conflict people to need aid Africa A n [email protected] d , r !58% y e j r j e 61,074 $40.3M r ! r Progress Alexandra de Sousa o d Refugess in Sudan Unmet requirements S n A Deputy Head of Office, OCHA Ethiopia since 7 November for the Response Plan [email protected] FTS: https://fts.unocha.org/appeals/9 36/summary BACKGROUND (12 Feb 2021) SITUATION OVERVIEW More than three months of conflict, together with constrained humanitarian access, has resulted in a dire humanitarian situation in Tigray.
    [Show full text]
  • Agrifose Report 23, 2020. "Vermi-Composting For
    AgriFoSe2030 Report 23, 2019 An AgriFoSe2030 Final Report from Theme 2 - Multifunctional landscapes for increased food security Vermi-composting for increased agricultural productivity, women empowerment and Today more than 800 million people around the environmental sanitation in world suffer from chronic hunger and about 2 billion from under-nutrition. northern Ethiopia This failure by humanity is challenged in UN Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 2: “End hunger, achieve food security and improve nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture”. Kassa Teka1, Eunce Githae2, Yemane Welday1, Efrem Gidey3 The AgriFoSe2030 program directly targets SDG 1 2 3 2 in low-income countries by translating state- Mekelle University, Ethiopia; Kenyatta University, Kenya; Wukro St. of-the-art science into clear, relevant insights Mary’s Institute, Tigray, Ethiopia that can be used to inform better practices and policies for smallholders. The AgriFoSe2030 program is implemented by a consortium of scientists from the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Lund University, Gothenburg University and Stockholm Environment Institute and is hosted by the AgriFoSe2030 platform SLU Global. Agriculture for Food Security 2030 The program is funded by the Swedish - Translating science into policy and practice International Development Agency (Sida). News, events and more information are available at www.slu.se/agrifose ISBN: 978-91-576-9706-6 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The project members would like to thank the AgriFoSe2030 theme 2, Multifunctional Landscape
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping and Remote Sensing of the Resources of the Republic of Senegal
    MAPPING AND REMOTE SENSING OF THE RESOURCES OF THE REPUBLIC OF SENEGAL A STUDY OF THE GEOLOGY, HYDROLOGY, SOILS, VEGETATION AND LAND USE POTENTIAL SDSU-RSI-86-O 1 -Al DIRECTION DE __ Agency for International REMOTE SENSING INSTITUTE L'AMENAGEMENT Development DU TERRITOIRE ..i..... MAPPING AND REMOTE SENSING OF THE RESOURCES OF THE REPUBLIC OF SENEGAL A STUDY OF THE GEOLOGY, HYDROLOGY, SOILS, VEGETATION AND LAND USE POTENTIAL For THE REPUBLIC OF SENEGAL LE MINISTERE DE L'INTERIEUP SECRETARIAT D'ETAT A LA DECENTRALISATION Prepared by THE REMOTE SENSING INSTITUTE SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY BROOKINGS, SOUTH DAKOTA 57007, USA Project Director - Victor I. Myers Chief of Party - Andrew S. Stancioff Authors Geology and Hydrology - Andrew Stancioff Soils/Land Capability - Marc Staljanssens Vegetation/Land Use - Gray Tappan Under Contract To THE UNITED STATED AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT MAPPING AND REMOTE SENSING PROJECT CONTRACT N0 -AID/afr-685-0233-C-00-2013-00 Cover Photographs Top Left: A pasture among baobabs on the Bargny Plateau. Top Right: Rice fields and swamp priairesof Basse Casamance. Bottom Left: A portion of a Landsat image of Basse Casamance taken on February 21, 1973 (dry season). Bottom Right: A low altitude, oblique aerial photograph of a series of niayes northeast of Fas Boye. Altitude: 700 m; Date: April 27, 1984. PREFACE Science's only hope of escaping a Tower of Babel calamity is the preparationfrom time to time of works which sumarize and which popularize the endless series of disconnected technical contributions. Carl L. Hubbs 1935 This report contains the results of a 1982-1985 survey of the resources of Senegal for the National Plan for Land Use and Development.
    [Show full text]
  • Wula Nafaa Ii Local Governance Component Observations and Opportunities Volume 1: Report
    WULA NAFAA II LOCAL GOVERNANCE COMPONENT OBSERVATIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES VOLUME 1: REPORT December 2008 This report is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). It was prepared by International Resources Group (IRG). WULA NAFAA II LOCAL GOVERNANCE COMPONENT OBSERVATION AND OPPORTUNITIES VOLUME 1: REPORT Charles Benjamin International Resources Group December 1, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ·································································································· 7 2. COMPONENT OBJECTIVES AND EXPECTED OUTCOMES···························· 8 3. BACKGROUND ··································································································· 9 3.1. Pilot ......................................................................................................................9 3.2. Challenges ...........................................................................................................9 3.3. Vision/Guiding Principles ....................................................................................11 3.4. Support other USAID programs ..........................................................................12 4. APPROACH······································································································· 14 4.1. Mechanisms for decentralized NRM ...................................................................14 4.1.1. Land and Forest Resources..............................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • The Tigray War & Regional Implications
    THE TIGRAY WAR & REGIONAL IMPLICATIONS (VOLUME 1) November 2020 to June 2021 1 CONTENTS 1. Foreword …………………………………………………………………………… 4 2. Introduction: war, offensives and atrocities 2.1 Overview …………………………………………………………………………… 7 2.2 Early attempts to halt the fighting ……………………………………………… 10 2.3 The war escalates …………………………………………………………………. 13 3. Ethiopia at war 3.1 The Federal Government v Tigray Regional State ……………………………. 16 3.2 Prime Minister Abiy’s short-lived whirlwind of reform ……………………... 30 3.3 An inexorable drive towards conflict 2018 – 2020 …………………………….. 49 3.4 President Isaias and Prime Minister Abiy – who is in the driving seat? ……. 60 4. Progress of the war 4.1 ENDF offensives along the southwestern front ……………………………….. 73 4.2 The northern fronts ………………………………………………………………. 76 4.3 The Southern Front ………………………………………………………………. 78 4.4 The ENDF’s strategy ……………………………………………………………... 78 4.5 Retreat and consolidation ……………………………………………………….. 80 4.6 TDF expansion and the start of semi-conventional warfare …………………. 82 4.7 Overall War Progress: November 2020 to May 2021 …………………………. 84 4.8 Conclusion ………………………………………………………………………… 88 5. The Ethiopian national context 5.1 Contextualising the war in Tigray ……………………………………………… 91 5.2 A threat to Ethiopia’s integrity? ………………………………………………… 92 5.3 Conflict and the rule of law ……………………………………………………... 94 5.4 Oromia politics and conflict - optimism and excitement ……………………. 95 5.5 Amhara politics and conflict …………………………………………………… 102 5.6 The south, east and west ……………………………………………………….. 112 5.7 Somali Region …………………………………………………………………… 113 5.8 Afar Region ……………………………………………………………………… 115 5.9 Benishangul Gumuz ……………………………………………………………. 116 5.10 Socio-economic stakes and the cost of the war ………………………………. 117 5.11 Concluding remarks ……………………………………………………………. 119 6. Diplomatic Efforts 6.1 UN Security Council and the African Union ………………………………… 122 6.2 The United States of America ………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • IMPORTANT You Must Read the Following Before Continuing. The
    IMPORTANT You must read the following before continuing. The following applies to the Prospectus following this page, and you are therefore required to read this carefully before reading, accessing or making any other use of the Prospectus. In accessing the Prospectus, you agree to be bound by the following terms and conditions, including any modifications to them any time you receive any information from us as a result of such access. THE FOLLOWING PROSPECTUS MAY NOT BE FORWARDED OR DISTRIBUTED OTHER THAN AS PROVIDED BELOW AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED IN ANY MANNER WHATSOEVER. THIS PROSPECTUS MAY ONLY BE DISTRIBUTED OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES AND WITHIN THE UNITED STATES TO “QUALIFIED INSTITUTIONAL BUYERS” (QIBs) AS DEFINED IN AND PURSUANT TO RULE 144A OF THE U.S. SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE SECURITIES ACT) (RULE 144A). ANY FORWARDING, DISTRIBUTION OR REPRODUCTION OF THIS DOCUMENT IN WHOLE OR IN PART IS UNAUTHORISED. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS DIRECTIVE MAY RESULT IN A VIOLATION OF THE SECURITIES ACT OR THE APPLICABLE LAWS OF OTHER JURISDICTIONS. IF YOU HAVE GAINED ACCESS TO THIS TRANSMISSION CONTRARY TO ANY OF THE FOREGOING RESTRICTIONS, YOU ARE NOT AUTHORISED AND WILL NOT BE ABLE TO PURCHASE ANY OF THE NOTES DESCRIBED IN THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT. NOTHING IN THIS ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION CONSTITUTES AN OFFER TO SELL OR THE SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY ANY SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION. THE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN AND WILL NOT BE REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OR WITH ANY SECURITIES REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF ANY STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF THE UNITED STATES AND MAY NOT BE OFFERED OR SOLD WITHIN THE UNITED STATES EXCEPT TO QIBs PURSUANT TO RULE 144A.
    [Show full text]
  • An Integrated Development Strategy for the Apiculture Industry Between Senegal, the Gambia and Guinea Bissau?
    AN INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY FOR THE APICULTURE INDUSTRY BETWEEN SENEGAL, THE GAMBIA AND GUINEA BISSAU? ARTICULARLY FAVOURABLE CLIMATIC AND BOTANICAL CONDITIONS The Bissau Guinean sector in the restructuring process P Guinea Bissau has extraordinary potential for apiculture, especially Apiculture in Sénégambie méridionale (the Gambia, in the north east region (Gabu), with marshland inundated with Casamance, northern Guinea Bissau) relies on the planted mangroves covering an area of approximately favourable and homogeneous eco-geographic potential. 800,000 hectares, forest coverage of an estimated 1.5 million It is developing along a wide band comprising hectares and a population of which the majority earns their Casamance (Senegal) and inclusive of an area livelihood from agricultural activities and picked products. In 1987, between the southern axis which passes through the the Apiculture Association produced around 80,7083 kg of refined regions, from East to West, of Gabu, Oio and Cacheu honey as well as a little more than 10 tonnes of refined wax (Guinea Bissau) and a northern axis from east to west (ASTECAP – SNV). At the beginning of the 1990s, there were of the Gambia and the western border of the 22,352 traditional hives in the northern part and 93,464 in the Tambacounda Department (east Senegal) going back southern part of the country. up eastward towards the Kaffrine Department (Kolda region of Senegal). Despite economic liberalisation set in motion in 1986, continual politico-military crises since the beginning of the 1990s has led to a The Sudano-Guinean climate enables the development noteworthy reduction of the activity which resulted in an overt of tremendously diverse forestial growth, particularly decline in honey exports.
    [Show full text]
  • Situation Report EEPA HORN No. 74
    Situation Report EEPA HORN No. 74 - 02 February 2021 Europe External Programme with Africa is a Belgium-based Centre of Expertise with in-depth knowledge, publications, and networks, ​ specialised in issues of peace building, refugee protection and resilience in the Horn of Africa. EEPA has published extensively on issues related to movement and/or human trafficking of refugees in the Horn of Africa and on the Central Mediterranean Route. It cooperates with a wide network of Universities, research organisations, civil society and experts from Ethiopia, Eritrea, Kenya, Djibouti, Somalia, Sudan, South Sudan, Uganda and across Africa. The situation reports can be found here. ​ ​ Reported war situation (as confirmed per 01 February) - Heavy fighting between Tigray Regional Forces and Ethiopian/Eritrean forces in areas between Semema and Edaga Berhe. It is reported that the Tigray Regional Forces have burned nine armoured vehicles. The information comes from commanders of Tigray Forces stationed in this battlefield. - Another active fighting at the moment is at Wukro Maray, 15 kms West of Aksum. The other side at this front is dominated by Eritrean Forces. Tigray Regional Forces is selectively fighting the huge new force of combined Ethiopian and Eritrean forces that entered in the second campaign. - Reported ambush on ENDF allied forces convoy at Wukro Maray town, near Shire, by Tigray regional forces. Meanwhile heavy fighting is reported for the third consecutive day in the Kola Tembien area. - Reported that a Tigrayan businessman named Yibrah Teame was allegedly murdered in the Bademe area by Eritrean troops (TMH). - Reported in direct communication with the political and military TPLF leadership that there are regular contacts with Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating the Burden of Malaria in Senegal: Bayesian Zero-Inflated Binomial Geostatistical Modeling of the MIS 2008 Data
    Estimating the Burden of Malaria in Senegal: Bayesian Zero-Inflated Binomial Geostatistical Modeling of the MIS 2008 Data Federica Giardina1,2, Laura Gosoniu1,2, Lassana Konate3, Mame Birame Diouf4, Robert Perry5, Oumar Gaye6, Ousmane Faye3, Penelope Vounatsou1,2* 1 Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland, 2 University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland, 3 Faculte´ des Sciences et Techniques, UCAD Dakar, Se´ne´gal, 4 National Malaria Control Programme, Dakar, Se´ne´gal, 5 Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America, 6 Faculte´ de Me´decine, Pharmacie et Odontologie, UCAD Dakar, Se´ne´gal Abstract The Research Center for Human Development in Dakar (CRDH) with the technical assistance of ICF Macro and the National Malaria Control Programme (NMCP) conducted in 2008/2009 the Senegal Malaria Indicator Survey (SMIS), the first nationally representative household survey collecting parasitological data and malaria-related indicators. In this paper, we present spatially explicit parasitaemia risk estimates and number of infected children below 5 years. Geostatistical Zero-Inflated Binomial models (ZIB) were developed to take into account the large number of zero-prevalence survey locations (70%) in the data. Bayesian variable selection methods were incorporated within a geostatistical framework in order to choose the best set of environmental and climatic covariates associated with the parasitaemia risk. Model validation confirmed that the ZIB model had a better predictive ability than the standard Binomial analogue. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods were used for inference. Several insecticide treated nets (ITN) coverage indicators were calculated to assess the effectiveness of interventions.
    [Show full text]