DOCSLIB.ORG

MASTER THESIS | Sustainable Cities Written By: Joakim Haslund Ryborg 07/06 - 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MASTER THESIS | Sustainable Cities Written By: Joakim Haslund Ryborg 07/06 - 2019 MASTER THESIS | Sustainable Cities Written by: Joakim Haslund Ryborg 07/06 - 2019 Table of content Danish resume ..........................................................................................................................................................4 Preface ......................................................................................................................................................................6 1.0 Problem analysis .................................................................................................................................................7 1.1 International awareness of climate changes ..................................................................................................7 1.2 Transitioning into renewable energy .............................................................................................................7 1.3 Copenhagen Municipality as the world’s first carbon neutral capital ...........................................................9 1.3.1 Solar photovoltaic (PV) goal ................................................................................................................. 10 1.3.2 PV potential in Copenhagen Municipality ............................................................................................ 11 1.4 Tendencies; national- and international influence on PV development ..................................................... 13 1.4.1 Industries and large conglomerates seek to invest in green technology, including PV’s..................... 13 1.4.2 European Union Agenda; new renewable energy directive ................................................................. 14 1.5 Conducted initiatives to succeed the 1% goal: ‘Solar Distrikt NV’ .............................................................. 15 Sub conclusion ................................................................................................................................................... 16 2.0 Problem formulation ....................................................................................................................................... 17 3.0 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................... 19 3.1 project structure .......................................................................................................................................... 19 3.1.1 Case study ......................................................................................................................................... 19 3.1.2 Qualitative interviews ....................................................................................................................... 20 3.1.3 Meetings and workshops ................................................................................................................. 21 3.1.4 Literature studies and document analysis ........................................................................................ 23 3.1.5 Direct observations and participating observations ........................................................................ 23 3.1.6 Epistemology .................................................................................................................................... 24 3.1.7 Internship knowledge ....................................................................................................................... 25 3.2 Theoretical perspective: Collaborative Governance ................................................................................... 27 3.2.1 Theoretical perspective ........................................................................................................................ 27 3.2.1 Collaborative Governance .................................................................................................................... 27 3.2.2 System Context ................................................................................................................................. 29 3.2.3 Drivers ................................................................................................................................................... 29 Page 2 out of 73 3.2.4 Collaborative Governance Regime ................................................................................................... 30 3.2.5 Collaborative dynamics .................................................................................................................... 31 3.2.6 Collaborative actions ........................................................................................................................ 32 3.2.7 Impacts ................................................................................................................................................. 32 3.2.8 Adaptation ............................................................................................................................................ 33 3.3 Applied theory ............................................................................................................................................. 33 4.0 Analysis ............................................................................................................................................................ 36 4.1 Case description: ‘Solar Distrikt NV’ ............................................................................................................ 37 4.1.1 Purpose of ‘Solar Distrikt NV’ ............................................................................................................... 38 4.2 System context of ‘Solar Distrikt NV’ ........................................................................................................... 39 4.2.1 Development of PV ............................................................................................................................... 39 4.2.2 Changes in legislation and regulation of privately-owned and municipal-owned PV applications ..... 43 4.2.2.1 Support schemes and public regulation for private PV application in Denmark .......................... 43 4.2.2.2 Political regulation of municipal-owned PV applications .............................................................. 46 4.3 The role of PV in the future energy system ................................................................................................. 50 4.4 Collaborative governance regime of ‘Solar Disktrikt NV’ ............................................................................ 53 4.4.1 Stakeholders ......................................................................................................................................... 54 4.4.2 End summation of the analysis............................................................................................................. 62 5.0 Discussion ........................................................................................................................................................ 63 5.1 Results in a theoretical perspective ............................................................................................................ 63 5.2 Results based on methods ........................................................................................................................... 63 6.0 Conclusion ....................................................................................................................................................... 65 7.0 Proposition towards a new collaboration ....................................................................................................... 67 7.1 Proposition .................................................................................................................................................. 67 7.2 Thoughts and reflections on this proposition ............................................................................................. 67 8.0 Bibliography ..................................................................................................................................................... 70 9.0 Appendix .......................................................................................................................................................... 73 Page 3 out of 73 Danish resume På baggrund af adskillige skelsættende begivenheder (Paris aftalen, IPCC-rapporten, Europaparlamentsvalg samt Danmarks folketingsvalg) med fokus på klimaet og bæredygtig omstilling, er opmærksomheden på især energiplanlægning i de danske kommunerne blevet intensiveret. I Københavns Kommune (KK) blev det i 2012 vedtaget af Borgerrepræsentationen, at KK skulle være verdens første hovedstad til at blive CO2 neutral i 2025. Dette har sat pres på bæredygtige tiltag i energiproduktionssektoren, hvortil KK med omfattende initiativer blandt andet ønsker at forøge den eksisterende solcellekapacitet, ikke kun på marker, men også på hustage inde i byen. ’Solar Distrikt NV’ er ét af disse tiltag, som forsøger at udbrede bygningsintegreret solcelleløsninger i det private boligsegment i Københavns Nordvestkvarter. Projektet består af et samarbejde på tværs af offentlige og private aktører, som udgør KK, beboerne i Nordvest samt diverse solcelleproducenter- og eksperter. Dette samarbejde ønsker at sætte fokus på solcelleløsninger på bygninger i København, som ikke går på kompromis med hverken de arkitektoniske eller bevaringsværdige
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GRETA - “Green Infrastructure: Enhancing Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services for Territorial Development”
    GRETA - “GReen infrastructure: Enhancing biodiversity and ecosysTem services for territoriAl development” Applied Research Greater Copenhagen and Scania Version 30/07/2019 This applied research activity is conducted within the framework of the ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme, partly financed by the European Regional Development Fund. The ESPON EGTC is the Single Beneficiary of the ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme. The Single Operation within the programme is implemented by the ESPON EGTC and co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund, the EU Member States and the Partner States, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. This delivery does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the members of the ESPON 2020 Monitoring Committee. Authors Elin Slätmo, Kjell Nilsson and Eeva Turunen, Nordregio (research institute under Nordic Council of Ministers, www.nordregio.org) (Sweden) Co- authors Hugo Carrao, Mirko Gregor - space4environment (Luxembourg) Jaume Fons, Raquel Ubach, Roger Milego, Anna Marín UAB (Spain) Katherine Irvine, Jessica Maxwell, Laure Kuhfuss, Scott Herrett The James Hutton Institute (UK) Gemma-Garcia Blanco TECNALIA (Spain) Advisory Group Project Support Team: Blanka Bartol (Slovenia), Kristine Kedo (Latvia), Julie Delcroix (EC, DG Research & Innovation), Josef Morkus (Czech Republic) ESPON EGTC: Michaela Gensheimer (Senior Project Expert), Laurent Frideres (Head of Unit Evidence and Outreach), Akos Szabo (Financial Expert). Acknowledgements We would like to thank the stakeholders in Greater Copenhagen and Scania - among others technical experts and officials in the city of Malmö and the city of Copenhagen, Region Skåne, the Business authority in Denmark - who generously collaborated with GRETA research and shared their insight into green infrastructure throught the online consultations, phone interviews and meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • Resumé Konkretisering Af Skybrudsplan Bispebjerg, Ryparken & Dyssegård Skybrudsoplandene
    BISPEBJERG, RYPARKEN & DYSSEGÅRD RESUMÉ KONKRETISERING AF SKYBRUDSPLAN BISPEBJERG, RYPARKEN & DYSSEGÅRD SKYBRUDSOPLANDENE I forbindelse med det meget voldsomme skybrud, der ramte København den 2. juli 2011, blev store dele af København ramt af omfattende oversvømmelser. Oversvømmelserne medførte store problemer for infrastrukturen i det meste af det indre Kø- benhavn og Frederiksberg. Der stod visse steder op til en halv meter vand i gaderne, og mange boliger og butikker fik alvorlige vandskader. Grundet de alvorlige konsekvenser, som skybrud- det den 2. juli 2011 og andre, mindre kraftige skybrud har haft for store dele af byen, har Københavns Kommune igangsat dette projekt. Kontretiseringen af skybrudsplanen har til formål at belyse initiativer, der kan medvirke til at reducere skaderne i forbindelse med skybrudshændelser fremover. Projektområdet omfatter Københavns Skybrudsplan 2012’s vandoplande Svanemøllen, Lersøgrøften, Utterslev, Utterslev Mose samt Tingbjerg i Vandløse vandopland, kort benævnt Bispebjerg, Ryparken og Dyssegård skybrudsopland. De foreslåede løsninger til skybrudssikring opfylder serviceni- veauet vedrørende oversvømmelser under skybrudshændelser i København, dvs. at der maksimalt kan accepteres ti cm vand på terræn ved en 100-års regnhændelse. Endvidere er det tilstræbt i henhold til de overordnede intentioner i Københavns Sky- brudsplan 2012 at udforme løsninger, der også har en værdi i sig selv og kan bibringe byen attraktive grønne og blå elementer. 2 SKYBRUDSOPLAND BISPEBJERG, RYPARKEN & DYSSEGÅRD BISPEBJERG, RYPARKEN & DYSSEGÅRD BAGGRUND OG UDFORDRINGER Bispebjerg, Ryparken og Dyssegård skybrudsopland modtager vand (regn-, spil- devand, vandløbs- og søvand) fra to vandbassiner: Utterslev Mose/Emdrup Sø bassinet på 21,9 km² og Lersøgrøften/Vilhelmsdalsløbbassinet på 7,2 km², i alt 29,1 km². Halvdelen af dette område ligger i Gladsaxe og Gentofte kommuner.
    [Show full text]
  • Materialized Genealogy: from Anonymous Cemetery Populations to Creating Alternative Narratives About Individuals and Family Burial Space
    genealogy Article Materialized Genealogy: From Anonymous Cemetery Populations to Creating Alternative Narratives about Individuals and Family Burial Space Sian Anthony Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Lund University, Box 192, 221 00 Lund, Sweden; [email protected] Received: 15 May 2018; Accepted: 31 July 2018; Published: 10 August 2018 Abstract: Archaeologists frequently excavate historic burials and the vast majority of the graves will be unidentified. It is rare, and also surprisingly difficult, to unite documentary sources and gravestone identities with the burials underneath. Sites are therefore interpreted and analyzed as holistic anonymous populations rather than as individual graves. Excavation of a 19th and 20th century cemetery in Copenhagen created an opportunity to explore the topic of working with identified graves through connecting to genealogical sources and theoretical approaches which are rarely encountered in archaeology. This study used alternative genealogies of grave plots based on different source materials: family trees, burial plot registers, and excavated archaeological evidence to illustrate the complementary interpretations that can be created. The research touches upon important issues of the rights and responsibilities of using the names and personal data of the dead; particularly in relation to their descendants. The conclusion is that it is vital to consider including names and sometimes personal information as doing so has deepened understanding of the variations within burial customs,
    [Show full text]
  • DISADVANTAGED AREAS of Copenhagen
    POLICY FOR DISADVANTAGED AREAS OF COPenHAGEN Contents page 4 Preface – joint responsibility, joint effort page 6 The policy in brief – focus on the things that work locally page 10 Vision – a city in balance page 14 The city's disadvantaged areas – in numbers – Copenhagen's disadvantaged areas in numbers page 20 Initiatives in disadvantaged areas – one municipality, also locally page 22 Unified efforts – operational, individual-oriented and area-based initiatives page 24 The public housing sector Text: Project group with representatives of the seven – a central partner municipal departments. Project manager: Technical and Environmental page 28 Development plans Administration, District Development – a prioritisation tool for customising solutions Design: TMF-Grafisk Design Photo: Gitte Lotinga, Copenhagen Municipality page 30 A strategy for change – from vision to concrete changes 2 POLICY FOR DISADVANTAGED AREAS POLICY FOR DISADVANTAGED AREAS 3 Preface – joint responsibility, joint effort With the policy for disadvantaged areas of Copenhagen Higher population – greater differences At the same time, problems have accumulated in certain We will fulfil these goals through binding partner- we will focus our efforts on creating green growth and In 2009, Copenhagen was voted the world's best parts of the city. Among other things, this is due to ships with everyone involved, preferential treatment improving quality of life in disadvantaged parts of the city and its popularity is reflected in its population outdated housing, allocation of public housing flats of disadvantaged areas and increased focus on what city through concentrated inter-departmental efforts growth: every month, 1000 new people settle in the to people receiving social security, social problems in works: unified core operations.
    [Show full text]
  • 1:20.000 Æblehaven Følager Wiinbladsg
    Forsvarsvej Henningsens Svejager- Bjergtoften Byværnsvej Batteri- Højgårds Allé Helsebakken Østmarken Fruevej Niels Andersens Vej vej vej Eggersvej Vilh. Aftenbakken Allé GERSONSVEJ Sønderengen Sydfrontvej Ellemosevej Rødstensvej Stenagervej På Højden Allé vej Bergsøe Dalstrøget Svejgårdsvej 9 Jomsborgvej GLADSAXEVEJ Niels Finsens Allé Stordyssen Ved Kagså VANDTÅRNSVEJ Aakjærs Allé Hellerupvej Margrethe- Sofievej STRANDVEJEN Kirkehøj Ammentorpsvej My local bicycle shop… cykelhandler... Min lokale Nordahl Griegs Vej Hjemmevej Dal Erik Bøghs Allé svin 2 Søborg Park Allé Lykkesborg Allé Ravnekærsvej get Onsgårdsvej Præstebrovej Onsgårds Thulevej Rygårds- Hf. Mosehøj Frödings Allé Tværvej Dysse- Sydmarken GLADSAXE SØBORG HOVEDGADE Røntoftevej C.V.E. Knuths Vej vænget stien Langdyssen Hans Jensens Vej GLADSAXE MØLLEVEJ IDRÆTSPARKIDRÆTSPARK Hellerup Kagsåvej HILLERØDMOTORVEJEN Sydmarken Munkegårdsvej Hellerup Hellerupvej Strandparksvej Lystbådehavn GLADSAXE RINGVEJ Mørkhøj Rundgården Wergelands Allé Rakets Marienborg Allé Hulkærsvej LYNGBYVEJ Kirkegård vej Hellekisten Transformervej Stendyssevej IRÆTSANLÆG RYVANGS ALLÉ IRÆTSANLÆG Svanemøllervej DYSSEGÅRDSVEJ IRÆTSANLÆG Dagvej Hyrdevej Æret Hellerupgårdsvej Dynamovej Bygade Dæmringsvej RygårdsAllé Hellerup Tuborg Linien Bark Gyngemosevej Knud Rasmussens Vej Runddyssen Dyssegårdsvej Frederikkevej Turbinevej Transformervej Knud Højgaards Vej Dyssebakken LYNGBYVEJ Station Gustav Wieds Vej Runebergs Allé Skt.Peders Kodans- Almind- ingen Ruthsvej Vej Ardfuren Isbanevej vej Munkely Vangedevej Vandrevej
    [Show full text]
  • Maj 2013 VVM-Redegørelse Og Miljøvurdering
    BISPEBJERG HOSPITAL MAJ 2013 VVM-redegørelse og miljøvurdering Bispebjerg Hospital VVM-redegørelse og miljøvurdering APRIL 2013 Sagsnr. 2013-43244 Doknr. 2013-302493 INDHOLDSFORTEGNELSE 1. Indledning ........................................................................................................... 8 2. Ikke teknisk resumé ........................................................................................... 9 2.1. Miljøpåvirkningerne i anlægs- og driftsfasen ........................................... 10 2.2. Københavns Kommunes sammenfattende vurdering ............................. 12 3. Beskrivelse af projektet ................................................................................... 14 3.1. Det kommende Ny Bispebjerg Hospital og Ny Psykiatri .......................... 16 3.1.1 Trafikale forhold ........................................................................ 18 3.2. Byggeriet af det nye hospital ................................................................... 19 3.2.1 Byggeområde 1 ........................................................................ 20 3.2.2 Byggeområde 2 ........................................................................ 21 3.2.3 Byggeområde 3 ........................................................................ 21 3.2.4 Byggeområde 4, 5a og 5b ........................................................ 21 3.3. Beskrivelse af anlægsfasen ..................................................................... 21 3.3.1 Nedrivning af bygninger i de tre faser .....................................
    [Show full text]
  • City of Cyclist 2013.Pdf
    CITY OF CYCLISTS - Copenhagen bicycle life MONUMENTAL MOTION Upon visiting new cities we instinctively look upwards, seeking out grand monuments that define the place. Here in the Danish capital, the iconic Little Mermaid statue has caused generations of visitors to utter the same four words: “But she’s so small!” Therein lies the key to understanding Copenhagen. The Little Mermaid isn’t small, you see. She’s life-size. Much like the city that she calls home. If it’s monuments you’re after in Copenhagen, look all around you. Right there at street level. Our greatest monument is motion. It is a massive, constant, rhythmic and life-sized legacy. This never-ending flow of Copenhageners on bicycles has been forty years in the making. In the 1960s, this city was just as car-clogged as anywhere else. Visionary decisions were made and the result can be seen all around you. The vast network of safe, segregated bike lanes crisscrossing the city has encouraged us to choose the bicycle. The people who make up this organic monument are from all walks of life. From every age and wage bracket. We don’t have cyclists in Copen- hagen, we merely have people who happen to ride their bicycles. Cycling in Copenhagen brings us closer to the life of the city and the people who inhabit it. Your fellow citizens are right there next to you, propelling themselves effortlessly through the urban landscape. We are one with our town on our bicycles. 2 MONUMENTAL MOTION MODAL SHARE OF TRIPS IN 2012 HOW MUCH DO COPENHAGENERS CYCLE? 6% 11% 20% 26% 1.27 M 25% 36% 14% Cycled
    [Show full text]
  • Bispebjerg 10
    Bydelsavisen 2. marts 2016 BISPEBJERG 10. årgang nr. 1 Herover en skitse til hvor søen ved Ryparken Station kunne komme til at ligge. Nedenfor ses et forslag til, hvordan cykelsti en på Tagensvej også kan fungere som såkaldt skybrudsvej. Ny chance for Utterslev Mose (Foto: Emilie Lønholm) Billedmanipulation der viser, hvorledes en fremtidig Lersø i Lersøparken kunne komme til at se ud Faste brugere af parken og andre borgere vil selvfølge- Store klimaprojekter på vej lig blive inviteret til at deltage i drøftelserne omkring parkens fremtidige brug. Denne proces forventes at Indenfor få år vil Bispebjerg Bydel få to nye større søer. Det sker som led starte sidst i 2016. i de forskellige klimatilpasningsprojekter, der har til formål at gøre stor- Om det bliver muligt også at genåbne lidt af Lygteåens byen mere robust og modstandsdygtig mod pludselige oversvømmelser forløb i parken er til gengæld usikkert. Lygteåen løber som følge af pludselige og voldsomme regnskyl. i rør fra Lyngbyvej, langs Strødamvej, under Lersø Park Disse klimaprrojekter handler dog ikke kun om regnvejr, men også om Allé, og ind under Lersøparken. Åen krydser under Ta- hvordan man kan gøre byen bedre at leve og bo i, når det ikke regner. gensvej omtrent ved Bispebjerghjemmet, og krydser under ringbanen lige inden Nørrebro Station. Lersøparkprojektet foreslås gennemført i 2017 I disse dage besluttes, hvilke projekter, der skal gennemføres i vores Søen ved Ryparken etableres i løbet af 2016 lokalområde i 2017, og øverst på prioriteringslisten står genåbning af Området mellem Ryparken og ringbanen ved Ryparken Lersøen i Lersøparken. S-station er lige nu en byggeplads.
    [Show full text]
  • Budgetønsker Fra Lokaludvalgene Til Budget 2022
    Center for Økonomi Økonomiforvaltningen Cover Til ØU Budgetønsker fra lokaludvalgene til budget 2022 20-08-2021 Sagsnummer i F2 Resumé 2021 - 3808 Lokaludvalgene Amager Øst, Brønshøj-Husum og Bispebjerg har hen- vendt sig med vedlagte ønsker til budget 2022. Dokumentnummer i F2 220854 Sagsfremstilling Sagsnummer eDoc 2021-0253164 Budgetforslaget 2022 sendes i høring hos Ældrerådet, Lokaludvalgene, Handicaprådet, Dialogforum, Udsatterådet, Frivilligrådet og Ungepane- Sagsbehandler let med høringsfrist mandag den 6. september 2021. Høringssvarene Mads Morell vil herefter blive sendt til Borgerrepræsentationens medlemmer. Høringssvar til budgetforslaget vil blive publiceret på budgethjemmesiden, samt udsendt til medlemmerne af Borgerrepræsentationen. Bilag Bilag 1: Amager Øst Lokaludvalgs ønsker til budget 2022 Bilag 2: Brønshøj-Husum Lokaludvalgs ønsker til budget 2022 Bilag 3: Bispebjerg Lokaludvalgs ønsker til budget 2022 ØKF Team Budget (2394) Sekretariatet for Amager Øst Lokaludvalg Økonomiforvaltningen BUDGET 2022 Amager Øst Lokaludvalgs ønsker til budget 2022 25. juni 2021 Sagsnummer 2021-0161625 På socialområdet Dokumentnummer 1. Rehabiliteringsmedarbejder til skæve boliger ved Kofoeds Skole. 2021-0161625-1 På kultur- og fritidsområdet 2. Grøn aktivitetssti rundt om Kløvermarken. 3. Ny forbygning til Sundbyøsterhallen. 4. Ketsjersportens Hus. 5. Driftsmidler og tryghedsmedarbejdere til multihallen i Jenagade. 6. Tryghedsmedarbejdere til hallen på Nordøstamager Skole. 7. Kunstnerisk udsmykning på Nordøstamager Skole. 8. Forlængelse af vagtrundering ved bygninger på Kløvermarksvej (bevilling udløber og er kun givet for 1 år). På teknik- og miljøområdet 9. Toilet i Amager Strandpark ved strandstation 4. 10. Bedre cykelforhold på Engvej, Wibrandtsvej, Hedegaardsvej og Strandlodsvej. 11. Midler til planlægning af Prøvestien samt midler til forprojektering af bro til Prøvestenen Syd. 12. Biodiversitetspark Store Møllevej. 13. Frugttræer og vilde blomster ved Lergravsstien ud mod Amager Strandvej.
    [Show full text]
  • Embodied, Affective Feminist Methodologies
    Roskilde University Making Senses of Nordvest Tracing the spaces, bodies and affects of a gentrifying neighborhood in Copenhagen Lapina, Linda Publication date: 2017 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (APA): Lapina, L. (2017). Making Senses of Nordvest: Tracing the spaces, bodies and affects of a gentrifying neighborhood in Copenhagen. Roskilde Universitet. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain. • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 10. Oct. 2021 Making Senses of Nordvest Tracing the spaces, bodies and affects of a gentrifying neighborhood in Copenhagen Linda Lapiņa Roskilde University, PhD thesis On the cover: The last “dormant” construction site in Nordvest (Glasvej) “FYR DIG SÆL”: “FIRE YOURSELF” Above: January 16, 2017 Below: February 1, 2017 Photos by Linda Lapiņa Making Senses of Nordvest Tracing the spaces, bodies and affects of a gentrifying neighborhood in Copenhagen Linda Lapiņa PhD Thesis Cultural Encounters Department for Communication and Arts Roskilde University, Denmark March 2017 Supervisors: Garbi Schmidt and Kirsten Hvenegård-Lassen Supervisor at Department for Gender, Sexuality and Social Justice, University of British Columbia, Canada, fall 2016: John Paul Catungal 1 “All of us shaped by all of us and then other things as well.” (Spahr, 2005, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Somalis in Copenhagen
    Somalis-cover-Copenhaneg_20141016_Layout 1 2014.10.16. 15:15 Page 1 AT HOME IN EUROPE SOMALIS SOMALIS IN Minority communities – whether Muslim, migrant or Roma – continue to come under COPENHAGEN intense scrutiny in Europe today. This complex situation presents Europe with one its greatest challenges: how to ensure equal rights in an environment of rapidly expanding diversity. IN COPENHAGEN At Home in Europe, part of the Open Society Initiative for Europe, Open Society Foundations, is a research and advocacy initiative which works to advance equality and social justice for minority and marginalised groups excluded from the mainstream of civil, political, economic, and, cultural life in Western Europe. Somalis in European Cities Muslims in EU Cities was the project’s first comparative research series which examined the position of Muslims in 11 cities in the European Union. Somalis in European cities follows from the findings emerging from the Muslims in EU Cities reports and offers the experiences and challenges faced by Somalis across seven cities in Europe. The research aims to capture the everyday, lived experiences as well as the type and degree of engagement policymakers have initiated with their Somali and minority constituents. 01 somalis-COPENHAGENinc-publish-2014-0930_publish.qxd 2014.10.16. 15:14 Page 1 Somalis in Copenhagen At Home in Europe 01 somalis-COPENHAGENinc-publish-2014-0930_publish.qxd 2014.10.16. 15:14 Page 2 ©2014 Open Society Foundations This publication is available as a pdf on the Open Society Foundations website under a Creative Commons license that allows copying and distributing the publication, only in its entirety, as long as it is attributed to the Open Society Foundations and used for noncommercial educational or public policy purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2018 at 14:00
    ST ALBAN’S CHURCH COPENHAGEN MAGAZINE FOR THE ANGLICAN CHURCH IN DENMARK 2018 www.st-albans.dk November – December Alban’s is a bi-monthly magazine printed by: JESPERSEN TRYK, Ved Langebro 1, 2300 København S. Email: [email protected] Copies are available in church and it is available to view on our website: www.st-albans.dk Maria Kvan Mortensen kindly distributes it by post to members of our community who cannot access it electronically. Editor: Beverly Lloyd-Roberts Managing Editor: Revd Smitha Prasadam, Nigel Rowley Photographers: As stated. Article authors: As stated. Contributions, articles and photographs are gratefully received. Saint Alban's Church follows the Danish copyright law. If we have unintentionally published something without permission, please contact us. Cover photo: St Alban’s Church, autumn 2018 by Bev Lloyd-Roberts Printed by Jespersen Tryk + Digital ~ 2 ~ Worship in November / December St Alban’s Church, Copenhagen NOVEMBER Sunday 4 10:30 Sung Eucharist at All Saints Wednesday 7 10:30 Holy Communion Saturday 10 11:00 Prayer Vigil on centenary of WW1 Sunday 11 09:00 Holy Communion on Remembrance Sun 10:30 Service of Commemoration & Bell Peal 12:15 Wreath laying at Bispebjerg Cemetery 14:00 “2nd” Sunday: Taize service for Peace Wednesday 14 10:30 Holy Communion Sunday 18 10:30 Sung Eucharist Wednesday 21 10:30 Holy Communion Sunday 25 10:30 Sung Eucharist at Christ the King with Archdeacon Colin Williams Licensing Peter Prasadam as Lay Reader Wednesday 28 10:30 Holy Communion DECEMBER Sunday 2 10:30 Sung Eucharist
    [Show full text]