GRETA - “Green Infrastructure: Enhancing Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services for Territorial Development”

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

GRETA - “Green Infrastructure: Enhancing Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services for Territorial Development” GRETA - “GReen infrastructure: Enhancing biodiversity and ecosysTem services for territoriAl development” Applied Research Greater Copenhagen and Scania Version 30/07/2019 This applied research activity is conducted within the framework of the ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme, partly financed by the European Regional Development Fund. The ESPON EGTC is the Single Beneficiary of the ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme. The Single Operation within the programme is implemented by the ESPON EGTC and co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund, the EU Member States and the Partner States, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. This delivery does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the members of the ESPON 2020 Monitoring Committee. Authors Elin Slätmo, Kjell Nilsson and Eeva Turunen, Nordregio (research institute under Nordic Council of Ministers, www.nordregio.org) (Sweden) Co- authors Hugo Carrao, Mirko Gregor - space4environment (Luxembourg) Jaume Fons, Raquel Ubach, Roger Milego, Anna Marín UAB (Spain) Katherine Irvine, Jessica Maxwell, Laure Kuhfuss, Scott Herrett The James Hutton Institute (UK) Gemma-Garcia Blanco TECNALIA (Spain) Advisory Group Project Support Team: Blanka Bartol (Slovenia), Kristine Kedo (Latvia), Julie Delcroix (EC, DG Research & Innovation), Josef Morkus (Czech Republic) ESPON EGTC: Michaela Gensheimer (Senior Project Expert), Laurent Frideres (Head of Unit Evidence and Outreach), Akos Szabo (Financial Expert). Acknowledgements We would like to thank the stakeholders in Greater Copenhagen and Scania - among others technical experts and officials in the city of Malmö and the city of Copenhagen, Region Skåne, the Business authority in Denmark - who generously collaborated with GRETA research and shared their insight into green infrastructure throught the online consultations, phone interviews and meetings. We would also like to thank the Members of ESPON Contact Points and the Members of ESPON Monitoring Committee for their support. Information on ESPON and its projects can be found on www.espon.eu. The web site provides the possibility to download and examine the most recent documents produced by finalised and ongoing ESPON projects. This delivery exists only in an electronic version. © ESPON, 2018 Printing, reproduction or quotation is authorised provided the source is acknowledged and a copy is forwarded to the ESPON EGTC in Luxembourg. Contact: [email protected] ISBN 978-99959-55-36-6 a GRETA - “GReen infrastructure: Enhancing biodiversity and ecosysTem services for territoriAl development” Table of contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 2 (Geographic) description of Greater Copenhagen and Scania ......................................... 4 2.1 Case study outline ............................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Territorial challenges ......................................................................................................... 6 3 The GI network and its potentials for territorial development in Greater Copenhagen and Scania ................................................................................................................................ 7 3.1 What is the approach to GI and ES in Greater Copenhagen and Scania ......................... 7 3.2 Strategic approach – priorities and benefits of GI and ES ................................................ 8 3.2.1 Scania ....................................................................................................................... 8 3.2.2 Greater Copenhagen ................................................................................................ 9 3.3 Spatial analysis of GI potentialities ................................................................................. 11 3.4 Resources ....................................................................................................................... 13 3.4.1 Economic evaluation - benefits ............................................................................... 13 3.4.2 Economic evaluation - costs ................................................................................... 14 4 Capacity of GI network in Greater Copenhagen and Scania to meet the demand of ES 15 4.1 What do GRETA analysis on ES supply and demand reveal? ....................................... 15 4.1.1 Analysis of supply and demand for Flood Regulation in Greater Copenhagen and Scania ..................................................................................................................... 17 4.1.2 Analysis of supply and demand for Reducing Soil Erosion in Greater Copenhagen and Scania .............................................................................................................. 18 4.1.3 Analysis of supply and demand for Water Purification in Greater Copenhagen and Scania ..................................................................................................................... 19 4.1.4 Analysis of supply and demand for Recreation in Greater Copenhagen and Scania 20 5 Governance practices, policy and planning instruments to implement GI and enhance ecosystem services in Greater Copenhagen and Scania ............................................... 21 5.1 Governance models - roles and responsibilities ............................................................. 21 5.1.1 Scania ..................................................................................................................... 21 5.1.2 Greater Copenhagen .............................................................................................. 22 5.2 Existing policies, planning instruments and initiatives..................................................... 22 5.2.1 Scania ..................................................................................................................... 22 5.2.2 Greater Copenhagen .............................................................................................. 24 5.3 Threats and conflicts ....................................................................................................... 25 5.3.1 Scania ..................................................................................................................... 25 5.3.2 Greater Copenhagen .............................................................................................. 26 5.4 Cooordination and cooperation ....................................................................................... 27 5.4.1 Scania ..................................................................................................................... 27 5.4.2 Greater Copenhagen .............................................................................................. 28 6 Lessons learned and good practice examples from the Greater Copenhagen and Scania ......................................................................................................................................... 29 6.1.1 Challenges for further GI development in Greater Copenhagen and Scania ......... 29 6.1.2 Opportunitites for GI through Cross-border Cooperation ........................................ 29 6.1.3 Achievements in GI implementation in Greater Copenhagen and Scania ............. 30 7 Policy messages and recommendations in Greater Copenhagen and Scania ............... 30 ESPON 2020 i 7.1 Policy messages.............................................................................................................. 30 7.2 Policy recommendations ................................................................................................. 31 8 Apendix ............................................................................................................................ 32 References .............................................................................................................................. 37 List of Maps Map 1. ESPON GRETA selected case studies ......................................................................... 1 Map 2. Greater Copenhagen and Scania .................................................................................. 4 Map 3. Map over Greater Copenhagen and Scania GRETA case study. Overview map on potential GI serving multiple policies (e.g biodiversity policy, water management policies, climate change adaptation and mitigation policies) (reference: GRETA analyses by UAB and S4e). ........................................................................................................................................ 11 Map 4 Balancing Supply and Demand for Flood Regulation in Greater Copenhagen and Scania. ................................................................................................................................................. 18 Map 5. Balancing Supply and Demand for Soil Erosion in Greater Copenhagen and Scania 19 Map 6. Balancing Supply and Demand for Water Purification in Greater Copenhagen and Scania ...................................................................................................................................... 20 Map 7. Balancing Supply and Demand for Recreation in Greater Copenhagen and Scania . 21 List of Tables Table 1. Potentialities for GI network in Greater Copenhagen and Scania based on GIS- analysis by UAB......................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • INNOVATION NETWORK »MORGENSTADT: CITY INSIGHTS« City Report
    City report City of the Future INNOVATION NETWORK »MORGENSTADT: CITY INSIGHTS« »MORGENSTADT: »MORGENSTADT: CITY INSIGHTS« City Report ® INNOVATION NETWORK INNOVATION Project Management City Team Leader Fraunhofer Institute for Dr. Marius Mohr Industrial Engineering IAO Fraunhofer Institute for Nobelstrasse 12 Interfacial Engineering and 70569 Stuttgart Biotechnology IGB Germany Authors Contact Andrea Rößner, Fraunhofer Institute for lndustrial Engineering IAO Alanus von Radecki Arnulf Dinkel, Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE Phone +49 711 970-2169 Daniel Hiller, Fraunhofer Institute for High-Speed Dynamics Ernst-Mach-Institut EMI Dominik Noeren, Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE COPENHAGEN [email protected] 2013 Hans Erhorn, Fraunhofer Institute for Building Physics IBP Heike Erhorn-Kluttig, Fraunhofer Institute for Building Physics IBP Dr. Marius Mohr, Fraunhofer Institute for lnterfacial Engineering and Biotechnology IGB OPENHAGEN © Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft, München 2013 Sylvia Wahren, Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA C MORGENSTADT: CITY INSIGHTS (M:CI) Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Engineering IAO Fraunhofer Institute for Factory Operation and Climate change, energy and resource scarcity, a growing Copenhagen has repeatedly been recognized as one Nobelstrasse 12 Automation IFF world population and aging societies are some of the of the cities with the best quality of life. Green growth 70569 Stuttgart Mailbox 14 53 large challenges of the future. In particular, these challen- and quality of life are the two main elements in Germany 39004 Magdeburg ges must be solved within cities, which today are already Copenhagen’s vision for the future. Copenhagen shall home to more than 50% of the world’s population. An be a leading green lab for sustainable urban solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Finger Plan’ a Robust Urban Planning Success Based on Collaborative Governance
    OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 25/7/2019, SPi 12 The Copenhagen Metropolitan ‘Finger Plan’ A Robust Urban Planning Success Based on Collaborative Governance Eva Sørensen and Jacob Torfing The Long Shadow of a Post-War Expansion Plan The metropolitan area in the Danish capital of Copenhagen has successfully avoided both urban sprawl and overly dense and chaotic urbanization. The early adoption of a comprehensive and adaptive urban plan has created a well-balanced, award-winning metropolitan area that combines residential neighbourhoods with green areas and access to public transport. The urban plan was drafted seventy years ago and still governs urban planning practices in the greater Copenhagen area. Physical planning of urban developments is extremely complex due to con- flicting pressures on land use, contradictory socio-economic dynamics, uncertain prognoses and outcomes, multi-level governance structures, and limited public planning capacities. In addition, comprehensive planning of housing and sup- portive infrastructures often fails because planning experts dream up ambitious master plans that have little or no bearing on local conditions, knowledge, and needs and only enjoy modest political and popular support. Finally yet import- antly, socio-economic turbulence, shifting political priorities, and bureaucratic resistance may undermine stated planning objectives and preferred strategies for how to attain them. Against this background, it is surprising how successful the so-called ‘Finger Plan’ in Copenhagen has been in governing decades of urban expansion in ways that secure desired outcomes in terms of high quality urban living and continuous support for core planning objectives by elected politicians, public planners, private stakeholders, and citizens. The Finger Plan was conceived in the optimistic post-war years from 1945 to 1948 when pressure on land use outside the city centre was still limited.
    [Show full text]
  • ADDRESSING the METROPOLITAN CHALLENGE in BARCELONA METROPOLITAN AREA Appendix
    ADDRESSING THE METROPOLITAN CHALLENGE IN BARCELONA METROPOLITAN AREA Appendix. Case studies of five metropolitan areas: Amsterdam, Copenhagen, Greater Manchester, Stuttgart and Zürich Case Studies of Five Metropolitan Areas: Amsterdam, Copenhagen, Greater Manchester, Stuttgart and Zürich is part of the study Addressing Metropolitan Challenges in Barcelona Metropolitan Area, which was drafted by the Metropolitan Research Institute of Budapest for the Barcelona Metropolitan Area (AMB). The views expressed herein are those of the authors alone, and the AMB cannot be held responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained in this document. © Àrea Metropolitana de Barcelona June 2018 Table of contents Amsterdam . 29 Copenhagen ....................................................... 36 Greater Manchester ................................................ 42 Stuttgart .......................................................... 52 Zürich ............................................................. 60 Addressing the Metropolitan Challenge in AMB. Case Studies AMSTERDAM (Netherlands) 1. National level framework 1.1. Formal government system The Netherlands is a constitutional monarchy with that is, only binding to the administrative unit which a representative parliamentary democracy and a has developed them (OECD 2017a:21). Aside from decentralised unitary state, characterised by a strong establishing the general legal framework and setting a political tradition of broad consensus seeking in policy strategic course, the state defined
    [Show full text]
  • Nordfronten Blev Nedlagt I 1920
    N ordfronten I Ge ntofte Kommune Indledning Københavns Befæstning bestod, i sidste halvdel af 1800-tallet, af Vestvolden, som ligger langs motorringvejen fra Avedøre til Utterslev Mose, og Nord- fronten, som bestod af en fort- og en batterilinie fra Gladsaxe til Dyrehaven. Hertil kom store søbefæstninger, hvoraf Hvidøre Batteri og Charlottenlund Fort er omtalt i denne folder. Fæstningsværket, som var et af verdens længst sammenhængende, var 25-30 km langt. På dele af strækningen kan man stadig se dette imponerende fæstningsværk. Fæstningen blev bygget fra 1886-1894. Befæstningen blev sat i gang af rege- ringen Estrup som et defensivt forsvarsværk, der skulle forsinke en stormagt i en evt. erobring af København. Den blev bemandet under 1. Verdenskrig og udvidedes med skyttegrave og betonbunkers. Vest- og Nordfronten blev nedlagt i 1920. Søbefæstningen blev nedlagt gradvist i løbet af det 20. århundrede. Vestvolden er fra Utterslev Mose til Køge Bugt bevaret som et vigtigt rekreativt område. Denne folder beskriver kort resterne af fæstningsanlæggene i Gentofte Kommune. Nogle ligger på privat grund og er ikke tilgængelige. Oversigtskort 7 9 6 8 3 2 4 5 1 10 1 Vangede Fort 7 Ordrup Krat Batterier 2 Vintappergårdsstillingen 8 Hvidøre Batteri 3 Garderhøjfortet 9 Christiansholms Batteri 4 Bernstorffs Batteri 10 Charlottenlund Fort 5 Gentofte Batteri Oversvømmelserne (ikke angivet) 6 Ermelunden Vangede Fort Vangede Fort eller Batteri blev færdigt i 1888 og nedlagt i 1920. Det var et ca. 300 m langt åbent halvmåneformet batterianlæg med en foranliggende tørgrav. Anlægget bestod af 2 batterilinier, adskilt af en kasematbygning, der indeholdt ammunitionsmagasiner samt indkvarteringsrum. Vangede Batteri blev købt af Gentofte Kommune.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to Gentofte Kommune a Great Place to Live and Work
    Welcome to Gentofte Kommune A great place to live and work 3 Welcome! Citizen services and business Centrally located and green The proximity to Copenhagen and Øresund Gentofte has a makes Gentofte Kommune a fine, centrally high level of service, located municipality in which to reside, live low taxes and a and work. The municipality has fine public sound economy transportation services revolving around Hellerup Station. Work and business Jobcentre Gentofte’s business policy seeks continued Jobcentre Gentofte offers services to citizens growth and competitiveness for the busi- and businesses in Gentofte Kommune. For ness community in the municipality. The citizens, we’re able to provide information starting point and building blocks for this and guidance on education, jobs and policy are Gentofte’s local strengths, perfect- job-seeking. ly in line with the shared vision throughout Greater Copenhagen of generating growth For businesses, we can help with recruit- and jobs throughout the region. ment, upskilling and retaining the workforce and also provide information on oppor- tunities for taking on staff under subsidy Gentofte wants to be an schemes. attractive place to work, with skilled managers and You’ll find the Job Centre at gentofte.dk/ jobcenter and at Gentofte Town Hall via the employees who enjoy great entrance at Maltegårdsvej 1 working conditions Borgerservice (citizen services) Borgerservice can help with passports, The policy is based on the idea that settle- driving licences, marriages, the National ment and a positive business climate should Register, health insurance, if you want to Bernstorffsparken / Photo: Thomas Rahbek, Slots- og Kulturstyrelsen. go hand in hand – supporting a well- change doctors, childcare placements, balanced city.
    [Show full text]
  • Gentoftes Historie
    HOVEDTRÆK AF GENTOFTES HISTORIE Forhistorien De historiske fund fra stenalder, bronzealder og Også Stolpehøjene ved Stolpegårdsvej i Vangede er jernalder er få og spredte. På Bloksbjerget, som godt bevaret. De ligger frit tilgængelige i 'Stolpegår- engang var en ø i 'Klampenborg Fjord', blev der dens' have og er særdeles synlige fra Stolpegårdsvej. efter 1. Verdenskrig gjort en del rige bopladsfund fra jægerstenalderen. Ørehøj eller Orehøj ved Øregårdsvænget i Hellerup lå på Øregårdens jorder og gav gården sit navn. Det De mest markante fortidsminder er de kuplede samme er tilfældet med flere af kommunens gamle bronzealderhøje, hvis antal vidner om en relativ tæt gårde, som ligeledes er blevet opkaldt efter bronze- beboelse i denne periode. Bronzealderhøjene er alle alderhøje, der lå på gårdenes jorder. Aurehøj er også placeret på de højeste punkter i landskabet, hvorfra en af de betydende høje i Hellerup. Den ligger i dag udsigten var smukkest. Mange kan idag være svære på Aurehøjvejs nordside. at finde, fordi de er tilplantede, afgravet eller belig- gende skjult i private haver. Der resterer 34 gravhøje Skjoldhøjene er to gravhøje, som ligger i villahaver i kommunen. Heraf elleve i Charlottenlund Skov og nord for Charlottenlund Skov. Højene har givet navn fire i Ermelunden. På kortet nedenfor er anført til Skjoldgården. På gårdens jorder lå tre andre høje, nogle af de væsentligste. som er blevet sløjfet. Brødhøjene ligger på hver sin side af Vældegårdsvej, syd for Bernstorffparken. De Baunehøj, som ligger øst for Vangede, var oprinde- er begge godt bevaret. lig én blandt mange bronzealderhøje, der lå på højdedragene vest for Gentofte Sø.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Vedtægt for Samarbejde Mellem Dyssegård, Gentofte, Hellerup
    1 Vedtægt for samarbejde mellem Dyssegård, Gentofte, Hellerup, Helleruplund, Jægersborg, Maglegård, Ordrup, Skovshoved og Vangede sognes menighedsråd i medfør af menighedsrådslovens kapitel 43 (lov nr. 432 om menighedsråd af 1. juni 1994) om DEN FOLKEKIRKELIGE SKOLETJENESTE I GENTOFTE KOMMUNE Menighedsrådene i Dyssegård, Gentofte, Hellerup, Helleruplund, Jægersborg, Maglegård, Ordrup, Skovshoved og Vangede sogne, Gentofte provsti, Helsingør stift, har vedtaget at samarbejde efter reglerne i denne vedtægt om at oprette og videreføre en folkekirkelig skoletjeneste. HJEMSTED OG FORMÅL § 01 Skoletjenestens hjemsted er Gentofte Kommune. § 02 Den folkekirkelige skoletjeneste i Gentofte Kommune har til formål at støtte samarbejdet mellem Folkeskolen og folkekirken i Gentofte Kommune bl.a. ved at gøre det nemmere for den enkelte lærer at komme i kontakt med kirker, præster, organister og andre kirkeligt ansatte i kommunen, at arrangere klassebesøg i kirkerne og at få besøg i klassen af de nævnte. SAMARBEJDETS FORM § 03 De samarbejdende menighedsråd hæfter solidarisk og indbyrdes med lige store andele for de økonomiske forpligtelser. Menighedsrådenes ejendomsret til skoletjenestens aktiver deles i samme forhold som den indbyrdes hæftelse. DELTAGERNE I SAMARBEJDET § 04 Skoletjenestens medlemmer er Dyssegård, Gentofte, Hellerup, Helleruplund, Jægersborg, Maglegård, Ordrup, Skovshoved og Vangede sognes menighedsråd. § 05 Efter skoletjenestens stiftelse kan nye medlemmer optages på vilkår fastsat af de samarbejdende menighedsråd i hvert enkelt tilfælde. Vilkårene godkendes af Kirkeministeriet. § 06 Et medlem kan opsige sit medlemskab med 12 måneders varsel med udgangen af et regnskabsår. dog kan et medlem udtræde af skoletjenesten med kortere varsel, såfremt de øvrige medlemmer samtykker heri. I særlige tilfælde kan kirkeministeren give tilladelse til, at et medlem udtræder uden de øvrige medlemmers samtykke, jfr.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlas Over Bygninger Og Bymiljøer Kulturarvsstyrelsen Og Gentofte Kommune Kortlægning Og Registrering Af Bymiljøer
    GENTOFTE – atlas over bygninger og bymiljøer Kulturarvsstyrelsen og Gentofte Kommune Kortlægning og registrering af bymiljøer KOMMUNENUMMER KOMMUNE LØBENUMMER 157 Gentofte 33 EMNE Kystbanens stationer LOKALITET MÅL Charlottenlund, Ordrup og Klampenborg 1:20.000 REG. DATO REGISTRATOR Forår/sommer 2004 Robert Mogensen, SvAJ og Jens V. Nielsen, JVN Ortofoto, 1:20.000 DDO©,COWI CHARLOTTENLUND, ORDROP OG CHARLOTTENLUND, ORDROP OG KLAMPENBORG STATIONER KLAMPENBORG STATIONER Historisk kort. Målt 1899 og rettet 1914, 1:20.000. KMS 2 3 CHARLOTTENLUND, ORDROP OG CHARLOTTENLUND, ORDROP OG KLAMPENBORG STATIONER KLAMPENBORG STATIONER KLAMPENBORG Klampenborg BELLEVUE GALLOP- BANEN HVIDØRE Ordrup SKOVSHOVED HAVN TRAVBANEN CHARLOTTEN- Charlottenlund LUND SKOV CHARLOTTENLUND FORT HELLERUP HAVN Hellerup Stationsbygningernes udformning afspejler den tidsmæssige forskydning af banens udbygningsetaper. Mål 1:20.000 2 3 2 45 GÅRDVEJ GÅRDVEJ 2 2 CHARLOTTENLUND, ORDROP OG CHARLOTTENLUND, ORDROP OG KLAMPENBORG STATIONER KLAMPENBORG STATIONER Hellerup Station ligger i Københavns Kommune. Det gælder også stationsbygningerne, uanset at de Kulturhistorie & arkitektur sætter deres stærke præg på Ryvangs Allé’s nord- ligste stykke, som ligger i Gentofte Kommune, øst De fire jernbanestationer på strækningen mellem for stationen. Det bør nævnes, at den nuværende Hellerup og Klampenborg vidner dels om væsentlige Gentofte Station oprindeligt var identisk med den perioder i jernbanehistorien, dels om den interesse ældste station i Hellerup. man i tidens løb har vist jernbanens bygninger. Charlottenlund Station fik i 1898 den nuværende Ved anlægget af Nordbanen 1863-64, fra København meget store bygning. Arkitekt var Thomas Arboe til Helsingør over Hillerød, anlagde man også en (1836-1917). Han opførte over hele landet en række sidebane fra Hellerup til Klampenborg i forventning stationer med anvendelse af gule mursten i en saglig om, at udflugtstrafikken til skov og strand, herun- stil, med understregning af det stoflige i murværket.
    [Show full text]
  • Resumé Konkretisering Af Skybrudsplan Bispebjerg, Ryparken & Dyssegård Skybrudsoplandene
    BISPEBJERG, RYPARKEN & DYSSEGÅRD RESUMÉ KONKRETISERING AF SKYBRUDSPLAN BISPEBJERG, RYPARKEN & DYSSEGÅRD SKYBRUDSOPLANDENE I forbindelse med det meget voldsomme skybrud, der ramte København den 2. juli 2011, blev store dele af København ramt af omfattende oversvømmelser. Oversvømmelserne medførte store problemer for infrastrukturen i det meste af det indre Kø- benhavn og Frederiksberg. Der stod visse steder op til en halv meter vand i gaderne, og mange boliger og butikker fik alvorlige vandskader. Grundet de alvorlige konsekvenser, som skybrud- det den 2. juli 2011 og andre, mindre kraftige skybrud har haft for store dele af byen, har Københavns Kommune igangsat dette projekt. Kontretiseringen af skybrudsplanen har til formål at belyse initiativer, der kan medvirke til at reducere skaderne i forbindelse med skybrudshændelser fremover. Projektområdet omfatter Københavns Skybrudsplan 2012’s vandoplande Svanemøllen, Lersøgrøften, Utterslev, Utterslev Mose samt Tingbjerg i Vandløse vandopland, kort benævnt Bispebjerg, Ryparken og Dyssegård skybrudsopland. De foreslåede løsninger til skybrudssikring opfylder serviceni- veauet vedrørende oversvømmelser under skybrudshændelser i København, dvs. at der maksimalt kan accepteres ti cm vand på terræn ved en 100-års regnhændelse. Endvidere er det tilstræbt i henhold til de overordnede intentioner i Københavns Sky- brudsplan 2012 at udforme løsninger, der også har en værdi i sig selv og kan bibringe byen attraktive grønne og blå elementer. 2 SKYBRUDSOPLAND BISPEBJERG, RYPARKEN & DYSSEGÅRD BISPEBJERG, RYPARKEN & DYSSEGÅRD BAGGRUND OG UDFORDRINGER Bispebjerg, Ryparken og Dyssegård skybrudsopland modtager vand (regn-, spil- devand, vandløbs- og søvand) fra to vandbassiner: Utterslev Mose/Emdrup Sø bassinet på 21,9 km² og Lersøgrøften/Vilhelmsdalsløbbassinet på 7,2 km², i alt 29,1 km². Halvdelen af dette område ligger i Gladsaxe og Gentofte kommuner.
    [Show full text]
  • Historien Om Lille Constantia I Charlottenlund Charlottenlund
    HISTORIEN OM LILLE CONSTANTIA I HISTORIEN OM LIL LE CONSTANTIA I CHARLOTTENLUND HISTORIECNH AORMLO LTILTLEEN CLOUNDST ANTIA I CHARLOTTENLUND Af Jørgen Serup og Birgitte Glob Af Jørgen Serup og Birgitte Glob Af Jørgen Serup og Birgitte Glob 201 6 2016 2016 Ejerforeningen Lille Constantia Ejerforeningen Lille Constantia 2016 Ejerforeningen Lille Constantia 1 Illustrationen på bogomslaget viser villaen Lille Constantia, Esperance Allé 8, der er den direkte forgænger for den nuværende beboelsesejendom af sammen navn, som denne historiske beretning drejer sig om. Vignet på forsidebladet viser traktørstedet Constantia, etableret som et lyststed tilbage i midten af 1700 tallet. Dette første Constantia er den historiske rod. Naboerne var Charlottenlund Slot og lyststedet Bonne Illustrationen på bogomslaget viser villaen Lille Constantia, Esperance Allé 8, der er den direkte forgænger Esperance, oprindelse til områdets hhv. vejens navne. for den nuværende beboelsesejendom af sammen navn, som denne historiske beretning drejer sig om. Vignet på omlagets bagside viser Bernstorffstøtten rejst ved Kongevejen i 1783 (tegning fra 1799) som Vignet på forsidebladet viser traktørstedet Constantia, etableret som et lyststed tilbage i midten af 1700 Gentofte bøndernes tak til Bernstorfferne for igangsættelsen af landboreformerne. Med udgangpunkt i tallet. Dette første Constantia er den historiske rod. Naboerne var Charlottenlund Slot og lyststedet Bonne Bernstorff Slots jorder omskabte de vores egn og hele Kongeriget. Esperance, oprindelse til områdets hhv.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysing Spatial Patterns of Social Housing Schemes in Vienna and Copenhagen
    MASTERARBEIT Titel der Masterarbeit Location of Social Housing: Analysing spatial patterns of social housing schemes in Vienna and Copenhagen Verfasserin DI Sandra Jurasszovich angestrebter akademischer Grad Master of Arts (MA) Wien, 1. September 2015 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt: A 066 664 Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt: Masterstudium DDP Urban Studies Betreuer: Prof. Dr. Jesús Leal (Universidad Complutense de Madrid) Sandra Jurasszovich Location of Social Housing: Analysing spatial spatial patterns of social housing schemes in Vienna and Copenhagen Erasmus Mundus Master Course in Urban Studies [4Cities] 2013-2015 1st of September 2015 Supervisor: Jesús Leal Abstract Providing social housing is a crucial subject in current political debate as well as in scientific literature. When examining the topic of social housing there are two major issues: firstly, what socio- demographic groups are entitled to benefit from social housing and how has the socio-economic composition changed over the last decades? And secondly, where in a city are social housing units built? The latter question, which is related to the planning system of a city, is oftentimes underestimated, disregarded or simply overlooked in literature covering social housing in Europe. This thesis addresses exactly this problem, its objective being the identification of how the planning systems are used to influence the location of social housing developments across urban space by the example of Vienna and Copenhagen. Both cities have repeatedly been appraised as being amongst the most liveable cities worldwide. As a result of their increasing attractiveness as a place to live in, land and housing prices have been soaring. The research underlines that the possibilities for providers of social housing are limited considerably by high land price.
    [Show full text]
  • Materialized Genealogy: from Anonymous Cemetery Populations to Creating Alternative Narratives About Individuals and Family Burial Space
    genealogy Article Materialized Genealogy: From Anonymous Cemetery Populations to Creating Alternative Narratives about Individuals and Family Burial Space Sian Anthony Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Lund University, Box 192, 221 00 Lund, Sweden; [email protected] Received: 15 May 2018; Accepted: 31 July 2018; Published: 10 August 2018 Abstract: Archaeologists frequently excavate historic burials and the vast majority of the graves will be unidentified. It is rare, and also surprisingly difficult, to unite documentary sources and gravestone identities with the burials underneath. Sites are therefore interpreted and analyzed as holistic anonymous populations rather than as individual graves. Excavation of a 19th and 20th century cemetery in Copenhagen created an opportunity to explore the topic of working with identified graves through connecting to genealogical sources and theoretical approaches which are rarely encountered in archaeology. This study used alternative genealogies of grave plots based on different source materials: family trees, burial plot registers, and excavated archaeological evidence to illustrate the complementary interpretations that can be created. The research touches upon important issues of the rights and responsibilities of using the names and personal data of the dead; particularly in relation to their descendants. The conclusion is that it is vital to consider including names and sometimes personal information as doing so has deepened understanding of the variations within burial customs,
    [Show full text]