Introduction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Introduction California CALIFORNIA Introduction n 1990 California had the second-largest Native American By the time Europeans came onto the scene, California was home to population of any state, with 242,000 Native American numerous “tribelets,” groupings of several villages, whose Iresidents, second only to Oklahoma. While most of these people members spoke dozens of languages from seven major language are native California Indians, many have come to California from families. In very few other places in the world was there such a other states to seek employment in the metropolitan areas of the diversity of cultures and high population densities; in most areas of state, one of the ten largest economies in the world. The California the state, this came about without the development of agriculture. peoples increasingly live in urban areas as well, but there are over 100 reservations, many of them in remote rural areas. In addition to It would be difficult to overstate the importance of acorns as a staple the groups recognized by the federal government, with rights to food source for most early people in California; even those peoples government services and sovereign status, there are currently in the northern part of the state who depended on salmon also used approximately 40 groups attempting to gain federal recognition. acorns. After being ground and treated to remove the toxic tannic The state has no official recognition procedure, although it does acid, the acorns were usually made into a kind of soup or gruel, keep a list of Native American contacts and “most likely often called “acorn mush.” The abundance of oaks and the great descendants” with whom to communicate in case human remains variety of other vegetable and animal foods made it possible for are uncovered in a given locale. permanent and semipermanent villages to flourish, a development that usually implies the development of agriculture. Prior to the coming of the Europeans, the peoples of California lived in all areas of the state, making use of the varied resources found Housing ranged from temporary, simple structures in the desert there. Any land that could support human life was utilized; there south to more elaborate cedar-plank houses in the north. While was no empty land. The contrast between the land area used by pottery was not used, basketry had reached heights of artistic and Native Americans before the 18th century and the minuscule land utilitarian development, even being used as cooking vessels by base they now possess is striking. means of hot stones placed in water. Many of the groups living in the rich acorn and salmon regions developed extensive material The history of California Indians falls into three more or less distinct cultures, with elaborately decorated objects representing prosperity periods: the period before contact with Europeans (until the middle and personal wealth. Government of the tribelets was generally of the 16th century), the Spanish/Mexican period (1769-1846), and carried out by a council of elders, including a head with limited the American period. powers. Relations among the groups appear to have been generally peaceful, The Precontact Period with well-developed trading networks between coastal and inland peoples, as well as between the northern and southern parts of the Very little is directly known about this period; tribal traditions and state. archaeology provide what information is available. By around 12,000 years ago, people who made their living by hunting large mammals moved into the state and were making spearpoints and The Spanish/Mexican Period arrowheads showing exquisite workmanship. By 7,000 B.C. people were living in most areas of the state; around 5,000 B.C. people were Although the Spanish had explored and claimed the coast of what living on Santa Rosa Island, off Santa Barbara. While we do not they called “Alta California” as early as 1542, it was not until 1769 know much about these early residents of the state, over the that they actually established a permanent presence there. During thousands of years their descendants have lived there they the two centuries between these dates, Spanish, English, Russian, developed very different ways of life, attuned to the land and and French ships visited California, either exploring or stopping for resources of California’s distinct climatic and ecological zones–from provisions on the way to other destinations. When the Spanish the cool, moist northwestern corner of the state, where people were finally decided to send a colonizing expedition northward, under dependent on salmon and acorns in the river valleys and on Gaspar de Portola, it was because they felt the need to guard against shellfish, ocean fish, and acorns along the coast; to the temperate territorial incursions from the Russians and the English, although central coastal areas, where large sea fish and sea mammals were the desire to win converts to the Christian faith was also an important sources of food; to the peoples of the inland lakes and important motive. valleys, dependent on freshwater fish and waterfowl, as well as some acorns; to the peoples of the foothills and mountains, with In establishing their chain of missions along the California coast, the larger settlements based on acorns and other plant foods, as well as Spanish employed a combination of armed force and religious some game; to the desert hunters and gatherers and the desert persuasion, with force predominating. The missions were built by farmers, east of the Sierra Nevada range. forced Indian labor, and the new converts were encouraged to settle at the mission sites in much larger communities than was their 227 California SMITH RIVER 139 FT. BIDWELL ELK VALLEY Siskiyou Crescent City Del Norte KARUK Yreka XL RANCH 395 Modoc QUARTZ VALLEY 97 RESIGHINI 5 ALTURAS CEDARVILLE YUROK Weed 101 LIKELY LOOKOUT BIG LAGOON Dunsmuir 89 TRINIDAD HOOPA VALLEY 299 BIG BEND 395 Eureka BLUE LAKE Trinity Shasta ROARING CREEK 299 Weaverville MONTGOMERY CREEK TABLE BLUFF Lassen REDDING 44 44 ROHNERVILLE SUSANVILLE 101 36 Humboldt Westwood Garberville 395 Red Bluff GREENVILLE Plumas 99 Tehama 89 Leggett 99 70 Quincy ROUND VALLEY GRINDSTONE CREEK Portola Mendocino Glenn Chico Butte 5 LAYTONVILLE ENTERPRISE Sierra 49 SHERWOOD VALLEY Oroville BERRY CREEK 89 MOORETOWN REDWOOD VALLEY Colusa Truckee POTTER VALLEY Grass Nevada COYOTE VALLEY Valley Placer 20 H B 80 Tahoe City PINOLEVILLE Yuba South Lake Tahoe HOPLAND E C Sutter El Dorado MANCHESTER 65 A G 50 CLOVERDALE Lake F D 70 WOODFORD COLONY Sonoma DRY CREEK SHINGLE SPRINGS STEWARTS POINT Yolo 5 Alpine Sacramento Napa 505 Amador Sacramento 395 101 80 1 Santa Rosa JACKSON BUENA VISTA BRIDGEPORT Vallejo Solano SHEEP RANCH Additional Northern 99 Calaveras 49 Tuolumne California Indian Lands Marin 680 Sonora Stockton TUOLUMNE 120 Mono A- BIG VALLEY Contra San Berkley 120 Costa Joaquin CHICKEN RANCH BENTON PAIUTE B- COLUSA Oakland San Francisco 120 Yosemite C- CORTINA San Francisco» 580 Village 6 880Alameda Modesto Mariposa D- MIDDLETOWN San Stanislaus 140 BISHOP E- ROBINSON Mateo San Jose 280 F- RUMSEY Santa Clara 41 1 5 Merced BIG PINE G- SULPHUR BANK 101 Merced NORTH FORK PICAYUNE Madera Santa Los Banos BIG SANDY 395 H- UPPER LAKE Cruz Gilroy 152 TABLE MOUNTAIN COLD SPRINGS Santa Cruz FORT INDEPENDENCE Fresno Inyo Salinas 180 Fresno Lone Pine Montery San 33 Giant Death Valley Junction Benito Forest LONE PINE 190 198 Hanford DEATH VALLEY 1 Tulare King City SANTA ROSA TIMBA-SHA SHOSHONE Monterey 198 127 Lucia Coalinga Kings TULE RIVER 65 101 395 99 33 San Simeon Paso Robles 15 Morro Bay 178 46 Bakersfield Baker San Luis Obispo 5 58 Kern San Luis 14 Obispo San Bernardino FORT MOJAVE Santa Maria Mojave Barstow 40 Santa Needles Barbara 1 15 CHEMEHUEVI SANTA YNEZ 14 95 Ventura 5 Santa Barbara Ventura Los Angeles SAN MANUEL TWENTY-NINE PALMS 1 101 Glendale San Bernadino Los Angeles COLORADO RIVER Riverside MORONGO Additional Southern California Indian Lands Santa Monica 1- AUGUSTINE 13- MESA GRANDE Riverside AQUA CALIENTE Santa Ana 20 2- BARONA 14- PAUMA & YUIMA 3 Blythe Long Beach Orange 1 3- CABAZONE 15- PECHANGA 15 16 19 10 4- CAHUILLA 16- RAMONA 15 4 TORRES-MARTINEZ 5- CAMPO (SYCAMORE VALLEY) 17- RINCON PALA 14 6- CAPTAIN GRANDE 18- SAN PASQUAL 17H10 LOS COYOTESImperial 13 7- CUYAPAIPE 19- SANTA ROSA 18 21 San Diego FORT YUMA 8- JAMUL INDIAN VILLAGE 20- SOBOBA 9 86 9- INAJA-COSMIT 21- SAN YSABEL 2 6 10- LA JOLLA 22- SYCUAN 8 2223 712 8 11 5 11- LA POSTA 23- VIEJA San Diego Calexico 12- MANZANITA 228 Introduction California custom. When people proved reluctant to change their way of life, authorized an investigation of the prevailing conditions, and in soldiers were used to forcibly move them to the missions, where 1906, after the revelation of the 1851-1852 treaties that were never they were kept in sex-segregated quarters and prevented from ratified, public reaction supported the passage of the first in a series leaving. In addition to the cultural disruption brought about by of appropriations, renewed almost annually until 1934, for moneys these conditions, the introduction of European diseases to a to be used to purchase land for landless Indians. In 1934 the Indian previously unexposed population caused the deaths of over two- Reorganization Act, intended to give Native American groups more thirds of the estimated 1769 population of 300,000 by 1832. As the autonomy, included a mechanism for the acquisition of land for labor force declined because of deaths and desertions, Spanish Indians. soldiers ranged farther afield to secure new “converts.” And the diseases spread to more distant communities ahead of the Before 1906, almost all lands set aside for California Indians were Europeans.
Recommended publications
  • Indian Cri'm,Inal Justice
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. 1 I . ~ f .:.- IS~?3 INDIAN CRI'M,INAL JUSTICE 11\ PROG;RAM',"::llISPLAY . ,',' 'i\ ',,.' " ,~,~,} '~" .. ',:f,;< .~ i ,,'; , '" r' ,..... ....... .,r___ 74 "'" ~ ..- ..... ~~~- :":~\ i. " ". U.S. DE P ----''''---£iT _,__ .._~.,~~"ftjlX.£~~I.,;.,..,;tI ... ~:~~~",­ TERIOR BURE AIRS DIVISION OF _--:- .... ~~.;a-NT SERVICES J .... This Reservation criminal justice display is designed to provide information we consider pertinent, to those concerned with Indian criminal justice systems. It is not as complete as we would like it to be since reservation criminal justice is extremely complex and ever changing, to provide all the information necessary to explain the reservation criminal justice system would require a document far more exten::'.J.:ve than this. This publication will undoubtedly change many times in the near future as Indian communities are ever changing and dynamic in their efforts to implement the concept of self-determination and to upgrade their community criminal justice systems. We would like to thank all those persons who contributed to this publication and my special appreciation to Mr. James Cooper, Acting Director of the U.S. Indian Police Training and Research Center, Mr •. James Fail and his staff for their excellent work in compiling this information. Chief, Division of Law Enforcement Services ______ ~ __ ---------=.~'~r--~----~w~___ ------------------------------------~'=~--------------~--------~. ~~------ I' - .. Bureau of Indian Affairs Division of Law Enforcement Services U.S. Indian Police Training and Research Center Research and Statistical Unit S.UMM.ARY. ~L JUSTICE PROGRAM DISPLAY - JULY 1974 It appears from the attached document that the United States and/or Indian tribes have primary criminal and/or civil jurisdiction on 121 Indian reservations assigned administratively to 60 Agencies in 11 Areas, or the equivalent.
    [Show full text]
  • LCSH Section K
    K., Rupert (Fictitious character) Motion of K stars in line of sight Ka-đai language USE Rupert (Fictitious character : Laporte) Radial velocity of K stars USE Kadai languages K-4 PRR 1361 (Steam locomotive) — Orbits Ka’do Herdé language USE 1361 K4 (Steam locomotive) UF Galactic orbits of K stars USE Herdé language K-9 (Fictitious character) (Not Subd Geog) K stars—Galactic orbits Ka’do Pévé language UF K-Nine (Fictitious character) BT Orbits USE Pévé language K9 (Fictitious character) — Radial velocity Ka Dwo (Asian people) K 37 (Military aircraft) USE K stars—Motion in line of sight USE Kadu (Asian people) USE Junkers K 37 (Military aircraft) — Spectra Ka-Ga-Nga script (May Subd Geog) K 98 k (Rifle) K Street (Sacramento, Calif.) UF Script, Ka-Ga-Nga USE Mauser K98k rifle This heading is not valid for use as a geographic BT Inscriptions, Malayan K.A.L. Flight 007 Incident, 1983 subdivision. Ka-houk (Wash.) USE Korean Air Lines Incident, 1983 BT Streets—California USE Ozette Lake (Wash.) K.A. Lind Honorary Award K-T boundary Ka Iwi National Scenic Shoreline (Hawaii) USE Moderna museets vänners skulpturpris USE Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary UF Ka Iwi Scenic Shoreline Park (Hawaii) K.A. Linds hederspris K-T Extinction Ka Iwi Shoreline (Hawaii) USE Moderna museets vänners skulpturpris USE Cretaceous-Paleogene Extinction BT National parks and reserves—Hawaii K-ABC (Intelligence test) K-T Mass Extinction Ka Iwi Scenic Shoreline Park (Hawaii) USE Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children USE Cretaceous-Paleogene Extinction USE Ka Iwi National Scenic Shoreline (Hawaii) K-B Bridge (Palau) K-TEA (Achievement test) Ka Iwi Shoreline (Hawaii) USE Koro-Babeldaod Bridge (Palau) USE Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement USE Ka Iwi National Scenic Shoreline (Hawaii) K-BIT (Intelligence test) K-theory Ka-ju-ken-bo USE Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test [QA612.33] USE Kajukenbo K.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara Ancient Plant Use and the Importance of Geophytes Among the Island Chumash of Santa Cruz
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara Ancient Plant Use and the Importance of Geophytes among the Island Chumash of Santa Cruz Island, California A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology by Kristina Marie Gill Committee in charge: Professor Michael A. Glassow, Chair Professor Michael A. Jochim Professor Amber M. VanDerwarker Professor Lynn H. Gamble September 2015 The dissertation of Kristina Marie Gill is approved. __________________________________________ Michael A. Jochim __________________________________________ Amber M. VanDerwarker __________________________________________ Lynn H. Gamble __________________________________________ Michael A. Glassow, Committee Chair July 2015 Ancient Plant Use and the Importance of Geophytes among the Island Chumash of Santa Cruz Island, California Copyright © 2015 By Kristina Marie Gill iii DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to my Family, Mike Glassow, and the Chumash People. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am indebted to many people who have provided guidance, encouragement, and support in my career as an archaeologist, and especially through my undergraduate and graduate studies. For those of whom I am unable to personally thank here, know that I deeply appreciate your support. First and foremost, I want to thank my chair Michael Glassow for his patience, enthusiasm, and encouragement during all aspects of this daunting project. I am also truly grateful to have had the opportunity to know, learn from, and work with my other committee members, Mike Jochim, Amber VanDerwarker, and Lynn Gamble. I cherish my various field experiences with them all on the Channel Islands and especially in southern Germany with Mike Jochim, whose worldly perspective I value deeply. I also thank Terry Jones, who provided me many undergraduate opportunities in California archaeology and encouraged me to attend a field school on San Clemente Island with Mark Raab and Andy Yatsko, an experience that left me captivated with the islands and their history.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Sustainment: the North Fork Mono Tribe's
    Native Sustainment The North Fork Mono Tribe's Stories, History, and Teaching of Its Land and Water Tenure in 1918 and 2009 Jared Dahl Aldern Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy from Prescott College in Education with a Concentration in Sustainability Education May 2010 Steven J. Crum, Ph.D. George Lipsitz, Ph.D. Committee Member Committee Member Margaret Field, Ph.D. Theresa Gregor, Ph.D. External Expert Reader External Expert Reader Pramod Parajuli, Ph.D. Committee Chair Native Sustainment ii Copyright © 2010 by Jared Dahl Aldern. All rights reserved. No part of this dissertation may be used, reproduced, stored, recorded, or transmitted in any form or manner whatsoever without written permission from the copyright holder or his agent(s), except in the case of brief quotations embodied in the papers of students, and in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. Requests for such permission should be addressed to: Jared Dahl Aldern 2658 East Alluvial Avenue, #103 Clovis, CA 93611 Native Sustainment iii Acknowledgments Gratitude to: The North Fork Mono Tribe, its Chairman, Ron Goode, and members Melvin Carmen (R.I.P.), Lois Conner, Stan Dandy, Richard Lavelle, Ruby Pomona, and Grace Tex for their support, kindnesses, and teachings. My doctoral committee: Steven J. Crum, Margaret Field, Theresa Gregor, George Lipsitz, and Pramod Parajuli for listening, for reading, and for their mentorship. Jagannath Adhikari, Kat Anderson, Steve Archer, Donna Begay, Lisa
    [Show full text]
  • Native American Heritage Commission 40Th Anniversary Gala
    “Itu ~(/; W/is ~the ~policy 4of ~the ~state Uwd/;that Native~ Americansll/~ remains ~ ~~~~JwJU~~JJand associated grave goods shall be repatriated.” - California Public Resources Code 5097.991 Table of Contents Event Agenda ....................................................................................................................1 Welcome Letter – Governor Edmund G. Brown Jr. ...........................................................2 2016 Native American Day Proclamation ...........................................................................3 Welcome Letter – NAHC Chairperson James Ramos ...................................................... 4 Welcome Letter – NAHC Executive Secretary Cynthia Gomez .........................................5 Keynote Speaker Biography ............................................................................................6 State Capitol Rotunda Displays .......................................................................................7 Native American Heritage Commission’s Mission Statement .............................................8 Tribal People of California Map .......................................................................................13 California Indian Seal ...................................................................................................... 14 The Eighteen Unratifed Treaties of 1851-1852 between the California Indians and the United States Government .................................................................................15 NAHC Timeline
    [Show full text]
  • UBCWPL University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics
    UBCWPL University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics -Papers for WSCLA 17- The Seventeenth Workshop on Structure and Constituency in the Languages of the Americas Edited by: Pat Littell, Analía Gutiérrez, Raphaël Girard, and Natalie Weber May 2014 Volume 36 -Papers for WSCLA 17- The Seventeenth Workshop on Structure and Constituency in the Languages of the Americas Chicago, Illinois March 9–11, 2012 Hosted by: Department of Linguistics, University of Chicago Edited by: Pat Littell, Analía Gutiérrez, Raphaël Girard, and Natalie Weber The University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics Volume 36 May 2014 UBCWPL is published by the graduate students of the University of British Columbia. We feature current research on language and linguistics by students and faculty of the department, and we are the regular publishers of two conference proceedings: the Workshop on Structure and Constituency in Languages of the Americas (WSCLA) and the International Conference on Salish and Neighbouring Languages (ICSNL). If you have any comments or suggestions, or would like to place orders, please contact : UBCWPL Editors Department of Linguistics Totem Field Studios 2613 West Mall V6T 1Z2 Tel: 604 822 8948 Fax 604 822 9687 E-mail: <[email protected]> Since articles in UBCWPL are works in progress, their publication elsewhere is not precluded. All rights remain with the authors. i Cover artwork by Lester Ned Jr. Contact: Ancestral Native Art Creations 10704 #9 Highway Compt. 376 Rosedale, BC V0X 1X0 Phone: (604) 793-5306 Fax: (604) 794-3217 Email: [email protected] ii Table of Contents PREFACE .......................................................................................................... iv HEATHER BLISS ......................................................................................... 1–14 Marking the boundaries: Blackfoot preverbs in narratives and elicitation ELENA BENEDICTO AND ELIZABETH SALOMÓN ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Native American Heritage Commission Response to HCD 2018 CDBG-DR
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA Gavin Newsom, Governor NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION November 18, 2020 Joseph Helo, Program Manager CA Department of Housing and Community Development CHAIRPERSON Laura Miranda Via Email to: [email protected] Luiseño Cc to: [email protected] VICE CHAIRPERSO N Re: Native American Contact List for the Owner Occupied Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Reginald Pagali ng Program - 2018 Community Development Block Grant-Disaster Recovery Project, Lake and Chumash Ventura Counties SECRETARY Dear Mr. Helo: Merri Lopez-Keifer Luiseño Attached are lists of tribes that have cultural and traditional affiliation to the area of potential effect (APE) for the project referenced above. I suggest you contact all of the tribes listed, and PARLIAMENTARI AN if they cannot supply information regarding the presence of cultural resources, they may Russell Attebe ry recommend others with specific knowledge. The list should provide a starting place to locate Karuk areas of potential adverse impact within the APE. By contacting all those on the list, your organization will better able to respond to claims of failure to consult, as consultation may be COMMISSIONER required under specific state Statutes. If a response from the tribe has not been received within Marshall McKay two weeks of notification, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) requests that you Wintun follow up with a telephone call or email to ensure that the project information has been received. COMMISSIONER William Mungary The NAHC also recommends that the project proponents conduct a record search of the Paiute/White Mountain NAHC’s Sacred Lands File (SLF) and also of the appropriate regional archaeological Apache Information Center of the California Historic Resources Information System (CHRIS) to determine if any tribal cultural resources are located within the APE of the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Native American Settlement to 1969
    29 Context: Native American Settlement to 1969 Francisco Patencio outside the roundhouse, c. 1940. Source: Palm Springs Historical Society. FINAL DRAFT – FOR CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL City of Palm Springs Citywide Historic Context Statement & Survey Findings HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP 30 CONTEXT: NATIVE AMERICAN SETTLEMENT TO 196923 The earliest inhabitants of the Coachella Valley are the Native people known ethnohistorically as the Cahuilla Indians. The Cahuilla territory includes the areas from the San Jacinto Mountains, the San Gorgonia Pass, and the desert regions reaching east to the Colorado River. The Cahuilla language is part of the Takic branch of the Uto-Aztecan language family and all the Cahuilla groups speak a mutually intelligible despite different dialects. The Cahuilla group that inhabited the Palm Springs area are known as the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians. The Cahuilla name for the area that is now Palm Springs is Sec-he, “boiling water,” named for the hot springs located in what is currently the center of the Palm Springs business district. The springs have always provided clean water, bathing, and a connection to the spiritual world, and were used for ceremonial and healing purposes.24 The Cahuilla people refer to themselves as ‘ivi’lyu’atum and are ethnographically divided into two patrilineal moieties: the Wildcats and the Coyotes. Each moiety was further divided into clans which are made up of lineages. Lineages had their own territory and hunting rights within a larger clan territory. There are a number of lineages in the Palm Springs area, which each have religious and political autonomy. Prior to European contact, Cahuilla communities established summer settlements in the palm-lined mountain canyons around the Coachella valley; oral histories and archaeological evidence indicates that they settled in the Tahquitz Canyon at least 5,000 years ago.25 The Cahuilla moved each winter to thatched shelters clustered around the natural mineral hot springs on the valley floor.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Recent Dear Colleague Letter 99-30, OCSE Notified You of A
    Location Codes Workgroup FIPS Coding Scheme Recommendation Summary Position 1 Position 2 Positions 3-5 Interstate Case FIPS State Identifier County/Functional Entity 9 0 BIA Tribe Identifier Tribal Case (Federally recognized) 8 0 ISO Country Identifier International Case Exception 0-9, A-Z (Canada – sub- jurisdiction) Tribal and International Case Location Codes 1 OCSE Case Locator Code Data Standards Tribal locator codes coding scheme Tribal Case Locator Codes • Classification code - 9 in position 1 • “0”(zero) in position 2 • Tribe Identification - BIA code in positions 3-5 Example: Chickasaw Nation 90906 • Addresses for tribal grantees– provided by tribes to IRG staff List of current tribal grantees: http://ocse.acf.hhs.gov/int/directories/index.cfm?fuseaction=main.tribalivd • Link to tribal government addresses web site: http://www.doi.gov/leaders.pdf 11/15/2006 2 OCSE Case Locator Code Data Standards Tribal Identification Codes Code Name 001 Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians of North Carolina 006 Onondaga Nation of New York 007 St. Regis Band of Mohawk Indians of New York 008 Tonawanda Band of Seneca Indians of New York 009 Tuscarora Nation of New York 011 Oneida Nation of New York 012 Seneca Nation of New York 013 Cayuga Nation of New York 014 Passamaquoddy Tribe of Maine 018 Penobscot Tribe of Maine 019 Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians of Maine 020 Mashantucket Pequot Tribe of Connecticut 021 Seminole Tribe of Florida, Dania, Big Cypress, Brighton, Hollywood & Tampa Reservations 026 Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida 027 Narragansett
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2. Native Languages of West-Central California
    Chapter 2. Native Languages of West-Central California This chapter discusses the native language spoken at Spanish contact by people who eventually moved to missions within Costanoan language family territories. No area in North America was more crowded with distinct languages and language families than central California at the time of Spanish contact. In the chapter we will examine the information that leads scholars to conclude the following key points: The local tribes of the San Francisco Peninsula spoke San Francisco Bay Costanoan, the native language of the central and southern San Francisco Bay Area and adjacent coastal and mountain areas. San Francisco Bay Costanoan is one of six languages of the Costanoan language family, along with Karkin, Awaswas, Mutsun, Rumsen, and Chalon. The Costanoan language family is itself a branch of the Utian language family, of which Miwokan is the only other branch. The Miwokan languages are Coast Miwok, Lake Miwok, Bay Miwok, Plains Miwok, Northern Sierra Miwok, Central Sierra Miwok, and Southern Sierra Miwok. Other languages spoken by native people who moved to Franciscan missions within Costanoan language family territories were Patwin (a Wintuan Family language), Delta and Northern Valley Yokuts (Yokutsan family languages), Esselen (a language isolate) and Wappo (a Yukian family language). Below, we will first present a history of the study of the native languages within our maximal study area, with emphasis on the Costanoan languages. In succeeding sections, we will talk about the degree to which Costanoan language variation is clinal or abrupt, the amount of difference among dialects necessary to call them different languages, and the relationship of the Costanoan languages to the Miwokan languages within the Utian Family.
    [Show full text]
  • Edible Seeds and Grains of California Tribes
    National Plant Data Team August 2012 Edible Seeds and Grains of California Tribes and the Klamath Tribe of Oregon in the Phoebe Apperson Hearst Museum of Anthropology Collections, University of California, Berkeley August 2012 Cover photos: Left: Maidu woman harvesting tarweed seeds. Courtesy, The Field Museum, CSA1835 Right: Thick patch of elegant madia (Madia elegans) in a blue oak woodland in the Sierra foothills The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its pro- grams and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sex- ual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Acknowledgments This report was authored by M. Kat Anderson, ethnoecologist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and Jim Effenberger, Don Joley, and Deborah J. Lionakis Meyer, senior seed bota- nists, California Department of Food and Agriculture Plant Pest Diagnostics Center. Special thanks to the Phoebe Apperson Hearst Museum staff, especially Joan Knudsen, Natasha Johnson, Ira Jacknis, and Thusa Chu for approving the project, helping to locate catalogue cards, and lending us seed samples from their collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Cahto Motion for Summary J
    Case 2:10-cv-01306-GEB -GGH Document 29-1 Filed 01/21/11 Page 1 of 43 1 Colin Cloud Hampson (Bar No.174184) SONOSKY, CHAMBERS, SACHSE, 2 ENDRESON & PERRY, LLP 750 B Street, Suite 3130 3 San Diego, California 92101 Telephone: (619) 546-5585 4 Attorneys for Cahto Tribe of the 5 Laytonville Rancheria 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 CAHTO TRIBE OF THE LAYTONVILLE ) Case No. 2:10-CV-01306-GEB-GGH RANCHERIA, ) 8 ) ) Plaintiff, 9 ) MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ) CAHTO TRIBE’S MOTION FOR vs. ) SUMMARY JUDGMENT 10 ) AMY DUTSCHKE, Regional Director for the ) 11 ) Pacific Region, Bureau of Indian Affairs, ) United States Department of the ) 12 Interior, KEN SALAZAR, Secretary of the ) Hearing: May 2, 2011 9:00 a.m. Interior, United States Department of the ) Judge: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. 13 ) Interior, LARRY ECHO HAWK, Assistant ) Secretary – Indian Affairs, United States 14 ) Department of the Interior, ) ) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 ) ) 17 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF 18 CAHTO TRIBE’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 19 20 21 22 23 24 109967.1 Case 2:10-cv-01306-GEB -GGH Document 29-1 Filed 01/21/11 Page 2 of 43 1 Table of Contents Page 2 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................1 3 STATEMENT OF FACTS ..............................................................................................................2 4 A. Background ..............................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]