DOCSLIB.ORG

Cahto Motion for Summary J

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cahto Motion for Summary J Case 2:10-cv-01306-GEB -GGH Document 29-1 Filed 01/21/11 Page 1 of 43 1 Colin Cloud Hampson (Bar No.174184) SONOSKY, CHAMBERS, SACHSE, 2 ENDRESON & PERRY, LLP 750 B Street, Suite 3130 3 San Diego, California 92101 Telephone: (619) 546-5585 4 Attorneys for Cahto Tribe of the 5 Laytonville Rancheria 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 CAHTO TRIBE OF THE LAYTONVILLE ) Case No. 2:10-CV-01306-GEB-GGH RANCHERIA, ) 8 ) ) Plaintiff, 9 ) MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ) CAHTO TRIBE’S MOTION FOR vs. ) SUMMARY JUDGMENT 10 ) AMY DUTSCHKE, Regional Director for the ) 11 ) Pacific Region, Bureau of Indian Affairs, ) United States Department of the ) 12 Interior, KEN SALAZAR, Secretary of the ) Hearing: May 2, 2011 9:00 a.m. Interior, United States Department of the ) Judge: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. 13 ) Interior, LARRY ECHO HAWK, Assistant ) Secretary – Indian Affairs, United States 14 ) Department of the Interior, ) ) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 ) ) 17 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF 18 CAHTO TRIBE’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 19 20 21 22 23 24 109967.1 Case 2:10-cv-01306-GEB -GGH Document 29-1 Filed 01/21/11 Page 2 of 43 1 Table of Contents Page 2 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................1 3 STATEMENT OF FACTS ..............................................................................................................2 4 A. Background ..............................................................................................................2 5 B. The Present Action.................................................................................................10 6 JURISDICTION ............................................................................................................................10 7 ARGUMENT.................................................................................................................................11 8 I. PRINCIPLES OF ADMINISTRATIVE FINALITY, CLAIM AND ISSUE 9 PRECLUSION BARRED THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR FROM REVIEWING THE TRIBE’S 1995 DISENROLLMENT ACTION........................................................11 10 A. Principles of Administrative Finality Apply to the IBIA Decision In Cahto 11 Tribe.......................................................................................................................11 12 B. The Regional Director Was Precluded From Reopening Questions Related to the Bureau’s Authority To Intervene in the Disenrollment 13 of the Sloans...........................................................................................................13 14 II. THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR’S 2009 DECISION WAS ARBITRARY AND CAPRICIOUS....................................................................................................................19 15 III. THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR’S DECISION WAS ERRONEOUSLY BASED ON A 16 FEDERAL REGULATION, 25 C.F.R. PART 62, WHICH DOES NOT APPLY HERE ...................................................................................................................22 17 A. Tribal Law Delegating Authority to Interior to Review Internal Tribal 18 Enrollment Matters Pursuant to 25 C.F.R. Part 62 Must Be Clear and Express...................................................................................................................22 19 B. The Regional Director’s Finding of Review Authority Under Part 62..................24 20 C. Tribal Law Did Not Authorize the Regional Director to Review the 21 Disenrollment Action as Required by 25 C.F.R. Part 62.......................................25 22 IV. THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR’S DECISION IS CONTRARY TO FEDERAL 22 LAW AS IT FAILS TO DEFER TO THE TRIBE’S INTERPRETATION OF 23 TRIBAL LAW REGARDING ELEGIBILITY FOR MEMBERSHIP.............................27 2423 Mem. Supp. Cahto Tribe Mot. Summ. J. - i Case 2:10-cv-01306-GEB -GGH Document 29-1 Filed 01/21/11 Page 3 of 43 1 Table of Contents 2 Page 3 A. Regional Director Was Required to Defer To A Reasonable Interpretation by the Tribe of Its Articles of Association......................................28 4 B. The Tribe’s Eligibility Determination Was Reasonable........................................30 5 1. The Tribe’s Determination That the Hoopa-Yurok 6 Settlement Act Was a Reservation Distribution Plan Was Reasonable .................................................................................................30 7 2. The Tribe’s Determination That The Sloans Has Been Included 8 On a Formal Membership Role with the Yurok Tribe Was Reasonable .................................................................................................32 9 V. THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR’S 2009 DECISION WAS CONTRARY TO 10 25 C.F.R. § 62.5 (b), TO THE EXTENT THAT THE 2009 DECISION PURPORTS TO RESOLVE ENROLLMENT MATTERS OF INDIVIDUALS 11 WHO WERE NOT SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED IN THE APPEALS ........................34 12 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................35 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 22 23 2423 Mem. Supp. Cahto Tribe Mot. Summ. J. - ii Case 2:10-cv-01306-GEB -GGH Document 29-1 Filed 01/21/11 Page 4 of 43 1 Table of Authorities 2 Page 3 Cases 4 Astoria Federal Savings and Loan Ass’n v. Solimino, 501 U.S. 104 (1991).................................12 5 See B.B. v. Rocky Mountain Reg’l Dir., BIA, 39 IBIA 48, 2003 WL 23170161 (2003)…..…….17 6 Brady v. Acting Phoenix Area Dir., BIA, 30 IBIA 294, 1997 WL 316443 (1997)........................28 7 Bravo-Pedroza v. Gonzales, 475 F.3d 1358 (9th Cir. 2007) .........................................................12 8 Bullcreek v. W. Reg’l Dir., BIA, 39 IBIA 100, 2003 WL 23170180 (2003).................................18 9 Cahto Tribe of the Laytonville Rancheria v. Pacific Regional Director, BIA, 38 IBIA 244 (2002)..............................................3,4,5,6,7,9,11,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,22,26,27 10 Castillo v. Pac. Reg’l Dir., BIA, 46 IBIA 209, 2008 WL 723763 (2008) .....................................14 11 Dyniewicz v. United States, 742 F.2d 484 (9th Cir. 1984)........................................................34,35 12 Feezor v. Babbitt, 953 F.Supp. 1 (D.D.C. 1996) ...........................................................................29 13 Greater Boston Television Corp. v. FCC, 444 F.2d 841 (D.C. Cir. 1970)....................................20 14 Gupta v. Thai Airways Int’l, Ltd, 487 F.3d 759 (9th Cir. 2007)....................................................14 15 Cf. Harper v. Virginia Bd. of Elections, 383 U.S. 663 (1966).......................................................33 16 Hawkins v. Risley, 984 F.2d 321 (9th Cir. 1993)...........................................................................18 17 Holland v. Acting Muskogee Area Dir., BIA, 33 IBIA 64, 1998 WL 1006449 (1998) .................28 18 Kendall v. Overseas Dev. Corp., 700 F.2d 537 (9th Cir. 1983) ....................................................13 19 Lowe v. Acting E. Okla. Reg’l Dir., BIA, 48 IBIA 155, 2008 WL 5539394 (2008)......................14 20 Martin v. Hunter’s Lessee, 14 U.S. 304, 326 (1816)…………………………………………….31 21 Medina v. INS, 993 F.2d 499, reh’g denied, 1 F.3d 312 (9th Cir. 1993).......................................12 22 Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assoc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 463 U.S. 29 (1983).....................20 23 Mpoyo v. Litton Electro-Optical Sys., 430 F.3d 985 (9th Cir. 2005).............................................13 24 Mem. Supp. Cahto Tribe Mot. Summ. J. - iii Case 2:10-cv-01306-GEB -GGH Document 29-1 Filed 01/21/11 Page 5 of 43 1 Table of Authorities 2 Page 3 NW. Envtl. Def. Ctr. v. Bonneville Power Admin., 477 F.3d 668 (9th Cir. 2007) .........................20 4 Novak Brothers v. Acting Aberdeen Area Dir., BIA, 32 IBIA 126, 1998 WL 233737 (1998) ......18 5 O’Bryan v. United States, 93 Fed. Cl. 57 (2010)..................................................................... 12-13 6 In re Palmer, 207 F.3d 566 (9th Cir. 2000)...................................................................................13 7 Parker v. S. Plains Reg’l Dir., BIA, 45 IBIA 310, 2007 WL 4303070 (2007)..............................28 8 Ransom v. Babbitt, 69 F. Supp. 2d 141 (D.D.C. 1999)..................................................................23 9 Sameena Inc., v. U.S. Air Force, 147 F.3d 1148 (9th Cir. 1998)...................................................35 10 San Manuel Band of Mission Indians v. Sacramento Area Dir., BIA, 27 IBIA 204, 1995 WL 137508 (1995)...............................................................................................28,29 11 Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez, 436 U.S. 49 (1978).......................................................9,22,23,29 12 Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Comm. v. Acting Minneapolis Area Dir., BIA, 13 27 IBIA 163, 1995 WL 77152 (1995) ...............................................................................29 14 Sloan v. U.S. Dept. of the Interior, No. 2:08-CV-03070-GEB-GGH (E.D. Cal) .....................10,18 15 Stratosphere Litig. LLC v. Grand Casinos, Inc., 298 F.3d 1137 (9th Cir. 2002) ..........................13 16 Stuckey v. Weinberger, 488 F.2d 904 (9th Cir. 1973)....................................................................12 17 Uintah and Uncompahgre Descendants v. Uintah and Ouray Agency Superintendent, BIA, 51 IBIA 220, 2010 WL 160782 (2010) ..................................................................................14 18 Underwriters
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Federally Recognized Indian Tribes
    Appendix C: Federally Recognized Indian Tribes The following tribal entities within the contiguous 48 states are recognized and eligible to receive services from the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs. For further information contact Bureau of Indian Affairs, Division of Tribal Government Services, 1849 C Street N.W., Washington, DC 20240; Telephone number (202) 208-7445.1 Figure C.1 shows the location of the Federally Recognized Tribes. 1. Absentee-Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma 2. Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians of the Agua Caliente Indian Reservation, California 3. Ak Chin Indian Community of Papago Indians of the Maricopa, Ak Chin Reservation, Arizona 4. Alabama and Coushatta Tribes of Texas 5. Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town of the Creek Nation of Oklahoma 6. Alturas Rancheria of Pit River Indians of California 7. Apache Tribe of Oklahoma 8. Arapahoe Tribe of the Wind River Reservation, Wyoming 9. Aroostook Band of Micmac Indians of Maine 10. Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation, Montana 11. Augustine Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians of the Augustine Reservation, California 12. Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians of the Bad River Reservation, Wisconsin 13. Bay Mills Indian Community of the Sault Ste. Marie Band of Chippewa Indians Bay Mills. Reservation, Michigan 14. Berry Creek Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California 15. Big Lagoon Rancheria of Smith River Indians of California 1Federal Register, Vol. 61, No. 220, November 13, 1996. C–1 Figure C.1.—Locations of Federally Recognized Indian Tribes and Alaska Native Corporations. C–2 16.
    [Show full text]
  • California-Nevada Region
    Research Guides for both historic and modern Native Communities relating to records held at the National Archives California Nevada Introduction Page Introduction Page Historic Native Communities Historic Native Communities Modern Native Communities Modern Native Communities Sample Document Beginning of the Treaty of Peace and Friendship between the U.S. Government and the Kahwea, San Luis Rey, and Cocomcahra Indians. Signed at the Village of Temecula, California, 1/5/1852. National Archives. https://catalog.archives.gov/id/55030733 National Archives Native Communities Research Guides. https://www.archives.gov/education/native-communities California Native Communities To perform a search of more general records of California’s Native People in the National Archives Online Catalog, use Advanced Search. Enter California in the search box and 75 in the Record Group box (Bureau of Indian Affairs). There are several great resources available for general information and material for kids about the Native People of California, such as the Native Languages and National Museum of the American Indian websites. Type California into the main search box for both. Related state agencies and universities may also hold records or information about these communities. Examples might include the California State Archives, the Online Archive of California, and the University of California Santa Barbara Native American Collections. Historic California Native Communities Federally Recognized Native Communities in California (2018) Sample Document Map of Selected Site for Indian Reservation in Mendocino County, California, 7/30/1856. National Archives: https://catalog.archives.gov/id/50926106 National Archives Native Communities Research Guides. https://www.archives.gov/education/native-communities Historic California Native Communities For a map of historic language areas in California, see Native Languages.
    [Show full text]
  • A Genocidal Legacy: a Case Study of Cultural Survival
    A GENOCIDAL LEGACY: A CASE STUDY OF CULTURAL SURVIVAL IN NORTHWESTERN CALIFORNIA ____________ A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, Chico ____________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in Anthropology ____________ by Aimee L. VanHavermaat-Snyder Fall 2017 A GENOCIDAL LEGACY: A CASE STUDY OF CULTURAL SURVIVAL IN NORTHWESTERN CALIFORNIA A Thesis by Aimee L. VanHavermaat-Snyder Fall 2017 APPROVED BY THE INTERIM DEAN OF GRADUATE STUDIES: _________________________________ Sharon Barrios, Ph.D. APPROVED BY THE GRADUATE ADVISORY COMMITTEE: ______________________________ _________________________________ Guy Q. King, Ph.D. Antoinette Martinez, Ph.D., Chair Graduate Coordinator _________________________________ Frank Bayham, Ph.D. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to begin by thanking the Bear River Band at Rohnerville Rancheria for their support of the Benbow Archaeological Project and this thesis. I would also like to thank Erika Cooper, THPO for the Bear River Band at Rohnerville Rancheria, Rick Fitzgerald of California State Parks, Kevin Dalton, and everyone involved with the Benbow Archaeological Project. A huge thanks goes to Greg Collins of California State Parks for leading this archaeological endeavor and for supporting this thesis work. Thank you to my thesis committee, Antoinette Martinez and Frank Bayham. Nette, your guidance and influence as an archaeologist, anthropologist, teacher, and friend have meant so much to me. The profound impact of your teaching career is immeasurable, and I count myself lucky to have studied and grown under your guidance. You have changed me and will forever be my example of a strong, brilliant, kind, and powerful woman. Frank, I have had so much fun working with you as your ISA, having you on my crew at Benbow, in class, on this thesis, and beyond! Dad, Mom (Lisa Pizza), and brother, I know how truly lucky I am to have such an amazing family.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Resources
    Supplemental Resources By Beverly R. Ortiz, Ph.D. © 2015 East Bay Regional Park District • www.ebparks.org Supported in part by a grant from The Vinapa Foundation for Cross-Cultural Studies Ohlone Curriculum with Bay Miwok Content and Introduction to Delta Yokuts Supplemental Resources Table of Contents Teacher Resources Native American Versus American Indian ..................................................................... 1 Ohlone Curriculum American Indian Stereotypes .......................................................................................... 3 Miner’s Lettuce and Red Ants: The Evolution of a Story .............................................. 7 A Land of Many Villages and Tribes ............................................................................. 10 Other North American Indian Groups ............................................................................ 11 A Land of Many Languages ........................................................................................... 15 Sacred Places and Narratives .......................................................................................... 18 Generations of Knowledge: Sources ............................................................................... 22 Euro-American Interactions with Plants and Animals (1800s) .......................................... 23 Staple Foods: Acorns ........................................................................................................... 28 Other Plant Foods: Cultural Context ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Career Advancement/Job-Related Graduate Admissions Application
    Employee Fee Waiver Program Graduate Application for Admission For Office Use Only Applicant Plans to Enroll in Approved California State University, Chico Fee Status: _____ By _____ Career Advancement or Res. Status: _____ By _____ Job-Related Courses A $55 non-refundable check or money order or completed CSU Request to Waive Admission Application Fee form MUST accompany this application. Semester/Year Have you applied to this campus before? Did you enroll? Fall: Yes Term: Yes SSN: Spring: No Year: No Chico State ID #: Legal name as you wish Last Name First Name Middle Name it to appear on your permanent record Other names(s) that may appear on your record Physical Address County (or Country if not USA) Mailing Address County (or Country if not USA) Permanent Address if different from above: Home Phone: Birth Date: Sex: Male Female Month / Day / Year Business Phone: Birthplace: Email Address: Degree Objective: MA MS Major & Option or Emphasis: Credential: Objective: Other: Citizenship Status: U.S. Citizen Non-U.S. Citizen, F Visa Non-U.S. Citizen, J Visa Immigrant, (I-551 Needed) Refugee Other: Country of Citizenship: USA Other Country: Alien Registration No. Date Issued: Do you need special services to accommodate a physical, perceptual or learning disability? Yes No Have you ever been convicted of a felony? Yes No List all institutions & locations attended since high school (even if Enrolled Fee Status no work was completed), and those you are now attending or plan Units Degree Date Degree Resident or to attend before enrolling at CSU, Chico. Attach an extra sheet, if From To Completed Earned (to be) Earned necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • 33 Federally Recognized Tribes
    COUNTY TRIBAL NAME (CULTURE) 1. DEL NORTE ELK VALLEY RANCHERIA OF CALIFORNIA (ATHABASCAN, TOLOWA) 2. DEL NORTE RESIGHINI RANCHERIA (YUROK) 3. DEL NORTE SMITH RIVER RANCHERIA (TOLOWA) 4. DEL NORTE YUROK TRIBE OF THE YUROK RESERVATION (YUROK) 5. HUMBOLDT BEAR RIVER BAND OF THE ROHNERVILLE RANCHERIA (MATTOLE, WIYOT) 6. HUMBOLDT BIG LAGOON RANCHERIA (TOLOWA, YUROK) 7. HUMBOLDT BLUE LAKE RANCHERIA (TOLOWA, WIYOT, YUROK) 8. HUMBOLDT CHER-AE HEIGHTS INDIAN COMMUNITY OF THE TRINIDAD RANCHERIA (MIWOK, TOLOWA, YUROK) 9. HUMBOLDT HOOPA VALLEY TRIBAL COUNCIL (HOOPA, HUPA) 10. HUMBOLDT / SISKIYOU (SHARED COUNTY KARUK TRIBE OF CALIFORNIA BORDER) (KARUK) 11. HUMBOLDT WIYOT TRIBE (WIYOT) 12. LAKE BIG VALLEY BAND OF POMO INDIANS OF THE BIG VALLEY RANCHERIA (POMO) 13. LAKE ELEM INDIAN COLONY OF POMO INDIANS OF THE SULPHUR BANK RANCHERIA (POMO) 14. LAKE UPPER LAKE BAND OF POMO INDIANS (HABEMATOLEL) (POMO) 15. LAKE MIDDLETOWN RANCHERIA OF LAKE MIWOK/POMO INDIANS (MIWOK, POMO and MIWOK-LAKE MIWOK) 16. LAKE ROBINSON RANCHERIA TRIBE OF POMO INDIANS (POMO) 17. LAKE SCOTTS VALLEY BAND OF POMO INDIANS (POMO, WAILAKI) 18. MENDOCINO CAHTO TRIBE OF THE LAYTONVILLE RANCHERIA (CAHTO, POMO) 19. MENDOCINO COYOTE VALLEY BAND OF POMO INDIANS (POMO) 20. MENDOCINO DRY CREEK RANCHERIA OF POMO INDIANS (MAHILAKAWNA, POMO) 21. MENDOCINO GUIDIVILLE RANCHERIA OF CALIFORNIA (POMO) 22. MENDOCINO HOPLAND BAND OF POMO INDIANS OF THE HOPLAND RANCHERIA (POMO, and SHANEL, SHO-KA-WAH) 23. MENDOCINO MANCHESTER-POINT ARENA BAND OF POMO INDIANS (POMO) 24. MENDOCINO PINOLEVILLE BAND OF POMO INDIANS (POMO) 25. MENDOCINO POTTER VALLEY RANCHERIA (POMO) 26. MENDOCINO REDWOOD VALLEY LITTLE RIVER BAND OF POMO INDIANS (POMO) 27.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Cahto Tribe of Laytonville Rancheria Coyote Valley Band of Pomo
    Cahto Tribe of Laytonville Rancheria Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians Hopland Band of Pomo Indians Little River Band of Pomo Indians Pinoleville Pomo Nation Potter Valley Tribe Robinson Rancheria of Pomo Indians Round Valley Indian Tribes Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians Sherwood Valley Rancheria of Pomo Indians May 3, 2019 Naval Facilities Engineering Command Northwest Attention: NWTT Supplemental EIS/OEIS Project Manager 3730 N. Charles Porter Avenue Building 385, Admin. Room 216 Oak Harbor, WA 98278-5000 Re: Tribal Oppositional Comments on Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for Northwest Training and Testing Dear Project Manager: The above Tribes submit the following comments on the Draft Supplemental EIS/OEIS (SEIS) for the Navy’s Northwest Training and Testing (NWTT) activities. Each is a federally recogniZed Tribe that maintains government-to-government relations with the United States and its agencies. The Tribes have commented on earlier reviews of the environmental impacts of the training and testing. The adequacy of the assessment of cultural, spiritual and environmental impacts from the Navy’s training and testing activities is especially important to us because they will take place in the Pacific Ocean, which holds great cultural and spiritual significance to the Tribes. The Tribes maintain many deeply significant cultural and spiritual ties to the coastline, marine environment and ocean waters along and adjacent to Mendocino and Humboldt Counties, California. The ten Tribes established the InterTribal Sinkyone Wilderness Council, which is charged with the responsibility to protect and preserve the cultural, spiritual and ecological resources that constitute the marine and terrestrial landscape of the traditional Sinkyone and adjacent Tribal territories.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliographies of Northern and Central California Indians. Volume 3--General Bibliography
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 370 605 IR 055 088 AUTHOR Brandt, Randal S.; Davis-Kimball, Jeannine TITLE Bibliographies of Northern and Central California Indians. Volume 3--General Bibliography. INSTITUTION California State Library, Sacramento.; California Univ., Berkeley. California Indian Library Collections. St'ONS AGENCY Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED), Washington, DC. Office of Library Programs. REPORT NO ISBN-0-929722-78-7 PUB DATE 94 NOTE 251p.; For related documents, see ED 368 353-355 and IR 055 086-087. AVAILABLE FROMCalifornia State Library Foundation, 1225 8th Street, Suite 345, Sacramento, CA 95814 (softcover, ISBN-0-929722-79-5: $35 per volume, $95 for set of 3 volumes; hardcover, ISBN-0-929722-78-7: $140 for set of 3 volumes). PUB TYPE Reference Materials Bibliographies (131) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC11 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS American Indian History; *American Indians; Annotated Bibliographies; Films; *Library Collections; Maps; Photographs; Public Libraries; *Resource Materials; State Libraries; State Programs IDENTIFIERS *California; Unpublished Materials ABSTRACT This document is the third of a three-volume set made up of bibliographic citations to published texts, unpublished manuscripts, photographs, sound recordings, motion pictures, and maps concerning Native American tribal groups that inhabit, or have traditionally inhabited, northern and central California. This volume comprises the general bibliography, which contains over 3,600 entries encompassing all materials in the tribal bibliographies which make up the first two volumes, materials not specific to any one tribal group, and supplemental materials concerning southern California native peoples. (MES) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnohistorical Background of the Chumash
    D-JID Bthnohistorical Background of the Chumash People, Including a Seprch for Legal Rights in Park Lands, for a General Eanagement Plan of \Channel Islands National Eonument, California Larry Van Horn Cultural Anthropologist Professional Support Division Denver Service Center National Park Service April 10, 1979 DSC .. TWE INFORMATION BASE PLEASE RETURN TO: TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER DENVER SERVICE CENTER NATIONAL PARK SERVICE INFO~ • TABLE 0F C01,:TEt!TS Page Note on the Gabrielino People i Ethnohistory of the Chumash People 1 ~eferences Cited Photograph of a Chumash Plank Canoe 19 Outline m.story of Eission Sant"- Ines and the Santa Ynez 20 Reservation (Uoyd 1955 :Appendix) Outline Data on the Santa Ynez Reservation 21 (U.S. Department of Commerce 1974:147) Act for the Relief of California Mission Indians, 1891 22 (26 Stat. 712) Act for California to sue in the U.S. Court of Claims for the 25 Indians of California, 1928 (45 StAt. 602) • Act for a Roll to be m"de of California Indians, 1930 27 (46 Stat. 259) Act to Amend 46 Stat. 259 for Further Enrollment of the Indic:>ns 28 of California, 1948 (62 Stat. 1166) Act to Provide for Per Capita Payments to the IndiPns of 29 California, 1950 (64 Stc:>t. 189) Act to Extend the Time for the Enrollment of the Indians of 31 California, 1954 (68 Stat. 240) Judgment of the U.S. Court of Claims, Number K-344, December 4, 32 1944, for $5,024,842.34 to be Paid to the Indians of California (102 C. Cls. 837) Final Determination or Judgment,.
    [Show full text]
  • Application for Undergraduate Admission2012-2013
    1 The California State University Application for Undergraduate Admission 2012-2013 Attach the $55 (U.S.) application fee payable to The California State University. The fee is non- refundable and may not be transferred to another term. Please print responses in black ink. A response to each item is mandatory unless otherwise indicated. SectionU A (Enrollment/Application Information) 1. This is an application for admission to _________________________________________________________ Name of CSU Campus Main Campus Check one term only and send to the campus listed above. Off-Campus Center Summer Quarter or Semester 2012 Fall Quarter or Semester 2012 Winter Quarter (or term) January 2013 Spring Quarter or Semester 2013 2. If you have previously applied to or attended this campus, please list: Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Term of Application Last Term Attended Term Year Term Year 3. Legal Name Last Name Suffix (e.g., Jr., Sr.) First Name Middle Name 4. Other Name(s) that may appear on your academic records Last Name First Name Middle Name 5. Current Mailing Address Street Number Street Name Apartment - City State/Province Zip Code Country, International if not USA Postal Code 6. Permanent Address (if different from current as indicated above) Street Number Street Name Apartment - City State Zip Code 7. Permanent Residence (if you live in California, list county of residence) If you live outside of California, list other U.S. state or territory: OR Country of residence: 8. Primary Telephone 9. Alternate Phone Area Code Number Area Code Number 10. E-mail address ________________________________________________ (Some campuses communicate with applicants via e-mail.
    [Show full text]
  • An Ethnohistory of the Mattole by Jamie Roscoe (1985)
    l tryl d AN E'IHNOHISTORY OF THE MATTOLE JAIIOS }i. IiffiCOE TABLE OF CONTENTS Page r. ABSTRACT i II. INTRODUCTION 'l A. Prehistory 1 B. Data Base 5 C. Methodology 7 IIT. ETHNOGRAPHIC BACKGROUND 10 rV. MATTOLE-WHITE CONTACTS PRE-1865 21 V" MASTOLE.WHITE RELATIONSHTPS POST.1955 55 VI. CONCLUSIONS 64 REFERENCES 69 Maps: 1. Mattole Territory with Tribelet Subdivisions 2. Reservations in Northwestern Cal i forni a I. ABSTRACT At present the prehistoric and early historic periods of the Mattore va11ey, situated within Humboldt county in northwestern california, are not welr understood. This study investigates the relationships of the Mattole rndians and the first white settrers within bhe contact setting of the Mattole va1.ey. Historical and anthropol0gical analyses of primary ethnographic and historical sources are used to (1) outline t{attole fndian and White land use patterns and (2) examine the turmoil resulting from the direct conflict between these Ewo patterns. Ethnohist,oric sources are examined and tribelet subdivisions within Ehe speakers of the Mattole language are defined for a better understanding of Mattole attitudes of social and political identity. This study concludes that the Mattole rndian culture disintegrated because (1) the whiEes prevented the Mattoles from using Ehe land and its resources in the traditional manner and (2) the social organization of the Mattole left them unprepared to nounE a significant force Eo resist the Whites and (3) the resulting near annihilation of the Mattoles and the peacemeal removal 0f the survivors to reservations or their attachment to white households lefb no viable group of Mattoles to perpetuate the culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Inquiry Set 3.2 - Learning About the Local California Indians/Native Californian ​ Communities
    Inquiry Set 3.2 - Learning about the Local California Indians/Native Californian ​ Communities I. Inquiry Set Introduction Inquiry Set Title Native Californian Communities Brief Description This collection of sources shows students the ways that Native people lived, and continue to live, in various regions of California. It demonstrates the ways that indigenous peoples in California interacted with their environments (natural resources, geographic location, climate) and illustrates the ways that the various environments in California influenced the development and cultures of California Indian communities. Authors Michelle M. Lorimer, CSU - San Bernardino Dante Barksdale, UCD graduate student Shelley Brooks, CHSSP Grade Levels 3 Topics/Concepts California Indian communities, first people in my community, First People, Native Americans in California, tribal homeland CA HSS Continuity and Change Standards / 3.2 Students describe the American Indian nations in their local region long ago and in the recent past. Frameworks ​ 3.2.2 Discuss the ways in which physical geography, including climate, influenced how the local Indian ​ nations adapted to their natural environment (e.g., how they obtained food, clothing, tools). Framework Third-graders prepare for learning California history in the fourth grade and United States history in the fifth grade Excerpt by thinking about continuity and change in their local community. In exploring their local community, students have an opportunity to make contact with times past and with the people whose activities have left their mark on the land. Students ask questions, read and analyze texts, including primary and secondary sources, engage in speaking and listening activities, and write a variety of texts. California Historical Society 1 Learning about the Local California Indians/Native Californian Communities In third grade, students build on their knowledge of geography, civics, historical thinking, chronology, and national identity.
    [Show full text]